Game 65 [Inverted] Preview: Trail Blazers versus Bobcats
Game Time: 4:00 p.m. TV: CSNNW
Last week a reader wrote with an interesting request. He noted that Blazersedge previews and recaps follow a regular form: the preview covers the opposing team almost exclusively, the recap the Blazers. This makes both sense and best use of time and words. He was curious, though, what a preview would look like if I wrote it about the Blazers. He suggested writing a Blazers-oriented preview in Dave style when Portland played a team they had recently faced, thus lessening the need for the traditional preview. The Blazers just played the Bobcats. No doubt you're aware that, absent star Gerald Wallace, they're stocked almost completely with players other teams have given up on. (Roster Here) Most of those players were abandoned for a reason, giving the Bobcats a decidedly thrift-store vibe. They're seriously short of scorers, though that should be remedied somewhat by the presumed return of Stephen Jackson tonight. In exchange they've lost Joel Przybilla to knee problems. They don't have good defenders. Few of their smaller players can shoot. Jackson, D.J. Augustin, and occasionally Boris Diaw are dangerous but they shouldn't be near enough to take the Blazers if Portland pays any attention whatsoever to rebounding and transition defense, refusing 'Cats second opportunities and cheap points. With that being the only capsule needed, I'll go ahead and make someone happy, inverting the preview to cover the Blazers. Obviously it won't be exactly the same as I know Portland's nuances too well and am perhaps too close to maintain the necessary detachment. But I shall try.
Three stories intertwine to form a rope dropping through Portland's 2010-11 season, offering a potential route out of the dark well in which they found themselves deposited with the news that center Greg Oden's knee required another microfracture surgery and Brandon Roy's knees lacked sufficient cartilage to allow him on the floor. The first thread of hope comes in the form of LaMarcus Aldridge. For years a reluctant bridesmaid, Aldridge has finally said yes to the dress this year, storming through February as the Western Conference Player of the Month and averaging 22 points, 9 rebounds, and 50% shooting on the year. If the Blazers have needed something in the past two months--size, scoring, rebounds, defense, a tough stand--Aldridge has provided. For now, Portland has a bona fide star around which to center their attack. The second thread has been the return of Brandon Roy and center Marcus Camby from injury. Roy is not fully healthy--never will be in all likelihood--but he has regained something of a first step and some confidence in his jumper. He provides a crucial second threat with the ball in his hands that Portland's lineup otherwise lacks. Camby is Portland's only viable center, giving them rebounding and defense plus a smart frontcourt operator balancing their youth elsewhere. The final thread comes in the form of Gerald Wallace, the long-time Charlotte Bobcats star now transitioning to Portland's power-packed lineup. Wallace provides instant energy, rebounding, and active defense, transforming Portland's admitted skill into long-awaited intimidation. Wallace also provides another scoring threat and has even been hitting his jumper since coming to the Blazers, shooting 40% from the arc. The rope is not a ladder. It sways and slips some nights. But after the bleak start to the year any chance at redemption for this injury-riddled team is welcome.
The Blazers sport a 37-27 record, having won 4 straight including victories against Miami, Orlando, and these same Bobcats. After a shaky start to the season on the road they have surged back, winning 7 straight away from the Rose Garden, albeit largely against sub-par competition.
Despite their collection of talent the Blazers have a hard time scoring. They average 96.2 points per game, 23rd in the league. Part of this is pace but part is also style of shot. Portland generates few easy buckets, save occasionally from offensive rebounds (at which they are quite accomplished). Portland is dead last in the league infast break points, 19th in points in the paint. They create turnovers often, leading the league in forced turnover percentage, but seem congenitally incapable of scoring off of them. Even worse, the Blazers don't generate extra points in the form of three-pointers or free throws. They're 21st in three-point percentage. Though they're excellent free throw shooters when they do draw fouls, they're 27th in the league at doing so. Salt in a 22nd-place finish in two-point percentage and you end up with an offense that has trouble generating points. They just don't hit enough shots, ending up with a wholly unsurprising 24th best shooting percentage in the league.
The Blazers fare a little better on defense. A combination of pace and diligence makes them misers in fast-break points given (2nd in the league to Orlando). For such a small team they're surprisingly good at preventing points in the paint given up as well, ranking 14th in that category. When you switch to non-pace-dependent stats, however, Portland's defense doesn't look as good. They're 21st in the league at shooting percentage allowed, 20th at three-point percentage allowed, 24th at effective field goal percentage allowed. Simply put, you can get shots against this team with any kind of respectable halfcourt offense. The Blazers are vulnerable to screens, to accomplished post players, and to any kind of attack that requires them to rotate consistently. Their favored defense is the zone but that's only effective for short spurts. The rest of the game Portland is scrambling and hoping to match you shot-for-shot. Understandably it's hard to build and maintain leads on this basis. Only three teams with winning records have a lower point differential than do the Blazers. Every Portland game seems to be a nail-biter no matter what the quality of opponent, save those times when the Blazers roll over in front of an obviously superior team.
The Blazers excel at offensive rebounding and are mediocre in the defensive rebounding department. Board work is the key to Portland's success and has been for years. When they control the glass and control the ball Portland can sway the game. If they're missing rebounds on the defensive end and missing out on second-chance points on the offensive end, the Blazers wilt.
In the end the Blazers register as a good team plagued by a healthy dose of "should be". A team with LaMarcus Aldridge, Brandon Roy (returning from injury, but still), Andre Miller, and a bunch of young talent that can run and steal the ball should be generating more points. A team with Roy, Nicolas Batum, Wesley Matthews, and Rudy Fernandez should be better at hitting the three and spreading the floor. A team with Batum, Matthews, Camby, and now Wallace should dominate on defense, not just get by. The Blazers can be coldly efficient at times. They can be hot and full of hustle at times. They just can't string those times together into a consistent whole...or at least they haven't yet.
Charlotte's best bet tonight is to do what most successful teams have done against Portland: throttle down LaMarcus Aldridge and make Portland score elsewhere. Aldridge may be the only Blazer outside of an occasionally-driving Wallace who can score any points of his own in the lane. Portland's starting lineup is full of non-reliable scorers and dribblers. Take away Aldridge and their first unit will register plenty of poor possessions. Charlotte needs to make Portland defend screens on the other end, keep the Blazers off of the offensive glass, and have a good showing from their bench as Portland's is suddenly strong with the new Wallace and the returning Roy. The Bobcats also have to remember that Portland is apt to start the game lackadaisically but finish strong. If the Blazers open the door early Charlotte needs to jump out to double-digits and keep the pressure on. Portland loves to reel you in as the game progresses but they tend to panic and fall apart if the separation gets too great. Putting the Blazers down early makes the game much easier and may be the Bobcats' only hope tonight.
Read all about Charlotte at Rufus on Fire,
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest Form here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow that seems really depressing.
Not sure if I like the reverse format. I would say one thing; we are much better then The bobcats. To pretend that they have a chance in this game is overestimating their ability and underestimating our talent. We did just put the screws to the heat. Who just beat la tonight. Blazers win and its not close.
by PortlandPhil on Mar 10, 2011 11:26 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Constructive criticism
But I agree with PortlandPhil, this ought to be an easy win
Winning!
OSU '06
GForce Crash Wallace FTW!
by TyboOSU on Mar 10, 2011 11:31 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Because they are warlocks!
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
by BlazerRoddy on Mar 11, 2011 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
Yes, I am on a drug, it's called Blazer basketball!
Who's that tromping across my bedge!
by Troll Blazer on Mar 11, 2011 12:17 PM PST up reply actions
This
sounds like a team we can beat! If we can just work hard on the boards we got ’em. In all other areas they suc!
We will win this one.
I hope Wallace channels his frustrations effectively.
I too have high hopes.
It sounds like GW has very deep roots. I can relate to that. I lived in the same town for over 50 years, although all reasons for living there had disappeared years ago, I still hung on to my roots until I about starved to death. I hated the DEQ for taking my job away for years, but finally decided what was done was done and hate wasn’t going to change that. So I went on with my new life made peace with the DEQ in my mind and am living happily in my new surroundings. I hope Gerald can discover this also. Nothing will bring it back.
hg
I believe it is Joel is hurt still.
We had him on a rehabilitation time table, they played him long periods of time. He said he told them that his knee was not healed yet. the over working of it made it swell. Which is like he said, he came back early to help the team his knee will probably take another year or two to heal completely. I hope he can hang on until the end of the year without re-injuring it that use the lock out to get stronger.
hg
The Trade
Looks good, as it did when it was done. Joel’s rehab was going to extend beyond the end of this season and the end of his contract. He was going to be able to help with some spot minutes, but was not going to be the player we were used to.
…having won 4 straight including victories against Miami, Orlando, and these same Bobcats. After a shaky start to the season on the road they have surged back, winning 7 straight away from the Rose Garden, albeit largely against sub-par competition.
Miami…sub par competition…Orlando…sub par competition… Huh?
Let’s talk about what’s happening now. These Blazers are looking capable of going 4-0 on this road trip and coming home to whup Dallas’ butt. The click clicked, and this crew is set to explode. Kicking Miami and Orlando when they were down was just the lift these guys needed to go on a streak to the Playoffs.
Stealth > Wealth
You could say they were sub-par. Miami was, like you said down, and Orlando was Howardless (headless).
in that note you could say we have been sub-par all year long
In fact, I don’t think we are par yet. BRoy is not 100%, Camby is not at full playing shape yet, Crash is still learning, so when do you become a par team? There is always something wrong with a team either mentally or physically.
In my book we have beaten 4 quality NBA teams and that is what we have to do to start our path to the play-offs as 500dogs said the switch or the click has clicked, it is time to whup butts, starting with the next game and continuing through the Dallas game to the play-offs.
hg
Here are the seven road wins:
Cleveland, Toronto, Detroit, Minnesota, Sacramento, Orlando without Dwight Howard, and Miami.
Most folks would have been pretty mad if the Blazers had not won the first six, eh? Combined record of those six teams (factoring in Orlando’s without Superman): 84 wins, 240 losses. They include 4 of the 5 worst overall records in the league and the bottom 3 overall.
I think “sub-par” was…mildly justified.
—Dave
Cleveland was fighting like heck to avoid the worst ever losing streak, K. Love and the Wolves were working to validate his All Star appearance, Sacramento is way better than their record, Orlando fields a fine team without Howard, and Miami is Miami.
Toronto and Detroit were gimmes, but the rest are wins to be proud of.
Stealth > Wealth
"Greg Oden's knee required another microfracture surgery"
Sorry to be nit picky.. but wasn’t it his other knee that required his second microfracture surgery? It is kind of an important distinction in my mind.
That is true and not nit picking
It was the other knee, and the first knee was reported to be stronger after micro fracture surgery. So the wear on his cartilage has been there for quite some time.
hg
Part of the reason I loved the trade,
now when teams double LMA we have a player that will dive to the hoop. This should help with points in the paint,FT’s attempted & maybe even create more room for three point shooters by drawing the D further into the paint. This is my hope as GW gets more familiar with his new teammates.
Somebody step up! - Mike Rice
confident
Blazers have lost some shockers to bad teams this season just as they have won some shockers against good teams. In general my feeling is don’t have any expectation about who’s going to win on any given night.
However, the Blazers have the best personnel they have had all year, and as witnessed by the Miami game they have overcome all the turnover and are playing as good of team ball as they have all season, something that is tougher to do with a deep bench than it was with only 6 players to put out on the court.
I would be truly shocked if they do not blow out Charlotte tonight. If they play a bad game, maybe they only win by 10-15.
“You could say they were sub-par. Miami was, like you said down, and Orlando was Howardless (headless).”
The Atlanta game will be a great test. Blazers played poorly in both the Atlanta and Houston games but it seemed to me that part of what happened in those games was that the opposing team played very inspired defense. The coming Atlanta game may give some idea whether the improved blazers are enough better to win against teams that have given them fits in the recent past.
by the way
With the addition of Wallace and the return of Roy playing some good ball would people think I am foolhardy to believe that in terms of caliber of their rotation that the Blazers are comparable to the best teams in the league? And add to that that if their play at Miami is indicative that those talented players have now been able to integrate their talent into excellent team ball, that the Blazers potentially are as good as a team like the Lakers talent-wise?
I really don’t think that’s a stretch. I think if there’s a major weakness going into the playoffs, it is probably more related to the fact that the rotation is sort of a precarious balance on account of oddities like two all-stars coming off the bench. And although they appear to be playing great team ball these guys have only been playing together a short time, this is not like the Celtic players who have played ball together for as long as anyone can remember.
Dave, It was erie
How accurate your assesment of the Blazers play to this point has been. You have the numers to back it.
Thankfully, we appear tobe coming together. However, one game does not make a season. The Miami game is the only aberation to your ananlysis in my opinion. So, I won’t give you any “Business” for simply being honest in the analysis. i find it helpful regarding putting a better definition on what we are seeing.
Hope exists for change though. Brandon seems healthier and in a role of assasin. Gerald is getting used to his tammates. Camby is back and not needed for supe long minutes. LMA is adjusting better to being te man with a bunch of guys around him that weren’t there when he actively became the Man. Dre is orchestrating. man, the assists Dre would have if some guys had hit a decent number of shots just after the Wallace Trade. And, patty seems to be a perfect colmpliment to the combination off the bench for now. All of this may get shut down more as teams scout it. But it is hope
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Mar 11, 2011 7:52 AM PST reply actions
Oh........
On the year. More coffee please.
by JeffePortland on Mar 11, 2011 8:17 AM PST up reply actions
Fun preview
It sounds like, at 10 games above .500, Portland still has a ton of room for improvement.
by goblazer1 on Mar 11, 2011 8:28 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Spot on review - to this point.
My hope is our offense gets more reliable as Crash becomes a staple, improving our offense and defense. Also, the current version of Roy continues to re-establish himself as an offensive threat. All this will give our shooters more time, and confidence, to make more shots.
by LicketyBrindleDowntheMiddle on Mar 11, 2011 8:56 AM PST reply actions
One nitpick on Portland's defense
It seems a glaring omission to not mention the turnover differential. That is how we are middle of the pack defensively, despite giving up a high percentage.
In the offensive section
They create turnovers often, leading the league in forced turnover percentage, but seem congenitally incapable of scoring off of them.
—Dave
The reverse preview was interesting
Thanks for posting it.
Rumor has it that Dos Equis first approached Aldridge, but Aldridge turned thrm down because the real 'most interesting man in the world' would not have to prove it in a commercial. - Canis Hoopus 1/7/11

by 
































