Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Game 2 Recap: Trail Blazers 101, Kings 79

THIS guy was the King tonight!

In a Nutshell

The Blazers allow the Kings to play to their strengths in the first half, falling behind by double-digits in the second quarter. Solid defense, forced turnovers, and fast-breaks make up that difference through the end of the first half and all through the second. The young Kings have no answer for Portland's knockout punch and lose big.

Game Flow

The opening minutes of this game belonged to Marcus, DeMarcus, LaMarcus, and Chuck. Both teams made a conscious effort to get their bigs involved early. Marcus Camby drove to the hoop, shot from the key, smacked a shot and posed for the crowd, plus directed a little traffic for the Blazers. DeMarcus Cousins responded with a series of twirling moves and awesome leaps towards the rim. LaMarcus Aldridge tried to answer in kind against Chuck Hayes but found his efforts thwarted by a Sacramento defense that swarmed him every time he got within ten feet of the hoop. LMA either rushed his shots or abandoned them entirely, leaving Cousins looking like the only major star on the floor. Back and forth the teams went until somebody shouted for the four horsemen to clear out. It was time for The Apocalypse, a.k.a. Gerald Wallace. He started his assault with a couple of nifty off-ball baseline cuts and proceeded to dismantle the Kings piece by piece. He streaked, he poked, he became the hub of Portland's offense...the successful offense anyway. 10 first-quarter points later he had made up for whatever hijinks Cousins managed and staked Portland to a narrow 25-23 lead after one.

And then the bench came in.

And you know, if facepalming were a violation the Blazers bench would be the most penalized unit in the league.

In the absence of Camby the Blazers couldn't grab a rebound to save their lives. Sacramento started feasting on their own missed shots instead of ruing them. In the absence of Wallace and Aldridge the Blazers had no credible scoring attack. Jamal Crawford started slowly once again, attempting plenty of shots but missing almost all. Without any Portland offensive rebounding to speak of the Kings were free to dine and dash off the glass. Their young athletes surged ahead while the Blazers mustered a series of weak jumpers in return. Coach McMillan dribbled the starters back in a little at a time but the gaping, Camby-less hole in the middle remained and Portland's other players couldn't gain traction. The Kings went up 10 mid-period. That's when Camby returned. All of a sudden the game normalized. A couple of Wesley Matthews splashes and sparks of life from Aldridge allowed Portland to crawl back to a tie, 46-all at the half.

The game was there for the taking in the third quarter. The victor would be whichever team figured out the other's weaknesses first and exploited them most thoroughly. This is where Portland's veterans helped. The Blazers decided three things were going to happen on defense: 1. Cousins wasn't going to score anymore. 2. If the Sacramento guards did damage, it wouldn't be on the break. 3. No more offensive rebounds for the Kings. They were flawless in both resolve and execution in these matters. After that the game was a cakewalk. Sacramento had to struggle for every point. Meanwhile the new and improved rebounding allowed Portland's small forwards--first Wallace and then Nicolas Batum--to leak out on Sacramento's frequent jumpers. Six or seven layups later this game was out of reach. The Kings rolled over and died, looking fatigued and demoralized. The Blazers looked lily-fresh, forcing turnovers, running the ball, and generally having a good time. Nate left the core players in until the final couple minutes to ensure the victory and Portland waltzed with a 101-79 trophy for their case.

Take-Away Points

See if this sounds familiar:

  • Marcus Camby makes a huge difference for this team because rebounding is required for the Blazers to have a chance.
  • Transition offense is crucial because the Blazers have trouble scoring inside otherwise. They get the ball near the hoop but just cannot seem to finish in there. If they're not O-rebounding and not running the game gets hard for them.
  • This team hangs its hat on forcing more turnovers than it creates.
  • If LaMarcus Aldridge doesn't produce in the halfcourt the Blazers get exposed. Their outside shooting can't spread the floor enough to allow easy shots.
  • The main way the Blazers do get easy shots in the halfcourt is sweet-looking jumpers off of screens.
  • You also have to love how the entire team is committed to drawing charges. Team spirit and defensive sacrifice FTW!
  • Once again the Blazers got ahead by preying on a somewhat less-experienced, somewhat less-talented, vulnerable team. Congratulations to Portland for seeing those weaknesses and exploiting them while covering their own enough to win. The big question: What happens against teams that punch back just as hard and don't have those same gaping vulnerabilities? Do the Blazers have another gear, another plan, even more resolve?

Individual Notes

Holy Crackers. Gerald Wallace kind of saved the Philadelphia game but he completely redeemed the Blazers in this one. For large stretches of that first half he was literally the only thing Portland had going. He also led the charge out of the gate in the second half. He did everything tonight on both ends. He is playing magnificent ball right now whether you want to talk about tangibles, intangibles, or the effect on the team. 8-11 shooting tonight, 8-9 free throws, 25 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 blocks, sick...sick...sick. Ger-ald WALL-ACE!

After that stumbling start LaMarcus Aldridge took full advantage of attention getting diverted elsewhere and scored his rear end off. All LMA needs is a small window...a little help to get uncorked. Tonight he got it from Wallace and that was all she wrote. 24 points on 10-15 shooting and 8 rebounds. I don't think he missed more than two shots after the first quarter.

The stats cannot describe what Marcus Camby means to this team right now. Wallace aside, the Blazers prospered when Camby was in and struggled when he sat until the lead got so big that no individual was that meaningful. Camby had better stay healthy this year. 9 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 blocks and plenty of good defense in 24 minutes.

Wesley Matthews struggled with his three-point shot tonight, matching his struggles to finish when he puts the ball on the floor. I'd be more comfortable if he would develop a single, money shot (probably the three) and the Blazers set him up for it and let the rest of his offense develop more slowly. I do like that he's staying aggressive and I do like that he is committed to defending come what may. The Blazer guards held Sacramento's backcourt power duo in check tonight and Matthews was a large part of that. 4-14 shooting, 0-5 from distance, 8 points, 5 rebounds for Wesley.

Raymond Felton also stayed aggressive, not shying away from the drive or his shot even when neither was working as well as he'd like. He's a veteran and he's not going to get rattled. Portland fans will just have to be patient. When he finds his comfort zone, providing he can hold it, he'll be an asset. The worry is that he appears to fade as games progress. That'll be something to watch. But his early drives look good. 2-8 shooting, 5 points, 6 assists.

As mentioned, Jamal Crawford had another slow start tonight. Unlike the Philly game he never got on track for this one, finishing 2-11 in 25 minutes. He did have 4 assists. That said. the Blazers need him to connect if he's going to be out there. Matthews is a better defender if both of them are going to shoot under 40% and miss threes.

Nicolas Batum went 29 minutes, went 6-6 from the foul line, and copied Gerald Wallace's leaking out ways for some nifty fast-break conversions. His defense was strong as always and his rebounding continued to look good. Like Matthews, his shot isn't falling early this season. He went 4-12 , 1-4 from the arc for 15 points and 5 rebounds. Those 15 points will show you what aggression going to the hoop will do even when your shot isn't connecting. That's a good sign for Batum.

Kurt Thomas played 18 minutes tonight. 3-4 from the field for 6 points and 3 blocks were the good part. He also threw his body in the way for charges. I love it when veterans know they're playing limited minutes and aren't afraid to go hard the entire time they're on the court. That's Thomas. That said, those young Kings athletes made him look not so young tonight on defense.

Craig Smith had a couple of moments on offense en route to 4 points in 8 minutes.

Chris Johnson had a couple of moments where he looked not ready to fill in for Camby en route to 2 points and 2 rebounds in 8 minutes.

Nolan Smith hit 2-2 shots for 4 points in 7 minutes but couldn't run the point and couldn't defend, looking even more not ready than Johnson.

Eliot Williams and Luke Babbitt got a couple of junk minutes. Just move along, nothing to see here.

Fun Stats

--Blazers 10 turnovers, Kings 18

--Demarcus Cousins scores 16 but almost all came in the first half. The Blazers iced him when it counted. Marcus Thornton scored 14 but took 15 shots to do it, Tyreke Evans earned only 4. The Blazers might not have the best defense in the league exactly but they sure know where to aim it.

--Kings only notch 11 assists and 7 fast break points. The Blazers look great by comparison with 25 and 17.

--Portland eventually tallied 52 points in the paint...an indication of just how badly the Kings broke down.

Final Thoughts

So far, so good! This is a much more fun team to watch than the Roy-less or Half-Speed teams we've seen the last couple of years.

Check out the reaction at SactownRoyalty, no doubt feeling a little less regal tonight.

Boxscore

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 193 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

While single-game plus-minus is usually not a useful stat

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that tonight’s highest plus/minus totals were Camby (19) and Wallace (25!).

Camby must have grinned when the crowd chanted Crash’s name. Always nice to have a live crowd appreciate your effort.

by Timmay! on Dec 27, 2011 10:49 PM PST reply actions  

I was at the game,

and not that that means everything, I’ll say that Wallace and Batum’s aggression overcame LA’s tentativeness on offense. Things like not being able to catch passes, not because he can’t but because he’s unaware, unprepared, and just a little scared-looking right now.

He needs to step into the game comfortable if he wants to be an elite player.

by Corvallis, OR on Dec 28, 2011 12:28 AM PST up reply actions  

scared????!!!!

no. unaware and unprepared??
The guy played one preseason game and didn’t play in training camp.
He is playing with a new point guard.
Maybe he needs to learn to read Felton’s mind.
Yeah…LMA!! Get on that!!!

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 9:58 AM PST up reply actions  

The people that do not like aldridge will never drop this soft stuff

he is only averaging 24.5 points a game. NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

He will never be good enough for these “fans” to get these folks off his back. I just usually roll my eyes and read on…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:06 PM PST up reply actions  

If Cousins can ever truly mature, he will be a force to be reckoned with for years to come.

He seemed truly flustered in the second half, and I suspect his oft-discussed mental makeup plays a part in that.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 27, 2011 10:51 PM PST reply actions  

The guy is a beast

But I don’t trust him as far as I could throw him.

—Dave

by Dave on Dec 27, 2011 10:57 PM PST up reply actions  

He won the battle with Thomas.

His baseline move to dunk was great. Beast, indeed.

I just don’t buy Sac’s roster. Who are the leaders on the team? They’ve gone all young, and it shows. Watching them makes me appreciate B Roy all the more.

/s

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 27, 2011 11:01 PM PST up reply actions  

The only player on their roster who really strikes me as a veteran leader-type is Hayes.

They only have three players older than 27 (Hayes, Garcia, and Salmons, and Salmons is hardly a team leader type).

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 27, 2011 11:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Thomas blocking Cousins with straight up man defense was a sweet play

Cousins really flourished when Johnson was on the floor

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 28, 2011 1:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Johnson is toast.

I’ve never been high on him, but his play lately has just been awful. He’s had some spectacular blocks, but he doesn’t fight for rebounds, he can’t score, and when he goes for some of those spectacular blocks he leaves his man. Just an unintelligent, one-dimensional, underweight shot-blocker.

The Cookie Monster will gobble up his minutes by the end of the month, and with any luck CJ will be waived and Przybilla will be signed (is that still possible?).

Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers

by Adam Randall on Dec 28, 2011 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Right, Chris Johnson is a scrub.

A 26-year-old D-League level scrub.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

lotta talent

But crafty Camby was schoolin him with good D

"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'

by sammymohawk on Dec 27, 2011 11:03 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Camby got in his head

Aside from wallace and batum matched up against the jimmer that is what really stymied Sac in the second half…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he's smarter than Zach Randolph, but maybe he's not.

He’s still young as all heck. I’ve been reading some ancient history lately and ean into a guy named denetrius, son of Antigonus — Antigonus was one of Alexander the Great’s generals who then had claim to a huge amount of conquered, pacified territory after Alexander died young. Demetrius was talented, exceptionally goodlooking, reasonably effective leading troops in battle — but he never matured.

Will Demarcus Cousins ever mature? He’s so talented physically — I’ve seen him dribble through traffic in a way very few big men ever can, and he’s 6’11" 280 lbs without any fat I can see — but can he settle himself down, take his time, learn all those subtle tricks that you learn when you’re not the #1 star on your team?

He’s still so young. I wouldn’t rule him out as a future All-Star. Lots of All-Stars aren’t nice guys. We’ll see.

ignacio

by ignacio on Dec 27, 2011 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Zach is the Black Hole

Like it or not, he’s giving 20 and 10 year in and year out.. Cousins is a long way from that.

by oregonslee on Dec 28, 2011 12:27 AM PST up reply actions  

There you go.

Our team beat their players.

Felton is still doing things that are a tad perplexing. That’s such a strange sight on a Nate team. Half seem like things that will be ironed out with familiarity. The other half just seem like “Ray” moments. He’s our only real point guard though.

It was great to see Nic get extended minutes. He needs them. His D, shooting touch, and ability to run the court in 5 steps are so, so sweet.

Also, for Jimmer fans keeping track. I’m pretty sure we scored on a break or secondary break after every one of his misses, as well as half of his makes. Sac isn’t hustling back. They were pretty disappointing, actually.

/s

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 27, 2011 10:58 PM PST reply actions  

5 GAZELLE steps.

He is so freaking graceful.
Got more minutes than either Felton or Crawford..or Matthews.
He’s in better shape.

by Natsthecat on Dec 27, 2011 11:48 PM PST up reply actions  

This.

We owe SLUC Nancy quite a bit, actually.

In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.

by conspirator5 on Dec 28, 2011 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

"those young Kings athletes made [KT] look not so young tonight on defense"

Demarcus Cousins disagrees! Beating him to the spot to draw the charge, and then standing him up on the block and swatting his shot seemed to take D-cuz out of the game for good.

by BaylessFace on Dec 27, 2011 10:58 PM PST reply actions  

Nic at the 2 alongside Wallace

was another intriguing development. If Nic can post his man for profit, his handle doesn’t matter as much. Granted, he won’t have the Jimmer over his shoulder every night, but I hope tonight built some confidence. I like that lineup for stretches!

by BaylessFace on Dec 27, 2011 11:00 PM PST reply actions  

even though it was only Jimmer, it was encouraging to see Nic post him so easily

Wasn’t that long ago that we couldn’t take advantage of Nash guarding Batum in the post

"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'

by sammymohawk on Dec 27, 2011 11:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Nic posted on Evans, too

and Evans is no Jimmer….the shot looked good (like a lot of Batum’s shots right now – looking good, but a smidge off)

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 28, 2011 2:00 AM PST up reply actions  

it is all about finding that range

I remember at the beginning of last season LMA came out playing deeper post than he had before and missing a ton of those shots, by mid december he was ramping up big time as he found the range. Nic has a huge advantage against most 2s in the league, I just hope his post range comes around. If it does Wallace, Batum and Aldridge playing 2-4 is a tough tough tough matchup for most teams…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

I was shocked to see Nate use Batum at the 2 this early in the season, and thrilled to see Batum take advantage of the mismatch.

by Rage_quit on Dec 27, 2011 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I've been harping on this a bit

So I’m happy to see that, at least against the against the Kings, he looked good at the 2. and I really like having him and Wallace on the court together.

They feed off each other, especially in the open court; nice tandem.

by Wotan on Dec 28, 2011 1:37 AM PST up reply actions  

"It was time for The Apocalypse, a.k.a. Gerald Wallace."

Love it!
After watching the game, I think GW needs a better nickname than “Crash,” though I couldn’t come up with a better one. The Apocalypse is perfect!

by Blazer_fann on Dec 27, 2011 11:03 PM PST reply actions  

"The Predator"

is the new one that has been going around

by BassBall on Dec 27, 2011 11:05 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah..some drunk guy on the 5th quarter came up with it.

The host of that show is pretty annoying and he likes it so I don’t.

by Natsthecat on Dec 27, 2011 11:50 PM PST up reply actions  

No I didn't

I read on OR-Live that Nate was going to release GW to be a predator and pick his prey. therefore I thought the Predator would be a good name.

hg

by BBK on Dec 28, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I am down with The Apocalypse

The Apocalypse to Boom Boom would be a great call to make…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

The Rhino impressed that is for sure

Played Hard, and more importantly was a PHYSICAL presence in there. Exactly what we needed.

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I like that you keep linking other teams

interesting to read what they have to say. Agree with their fans about saying our fans over value our late first round picks (elliot williams, luke babbit, rudy) and how our fan base having a wide range of stances on low they feel about Nate.

by Rage_quit on Dec 27, 2011 11:13 PM PST reply actions  

What's ironic is that they are similar in that regard

Fans calling for PW’s head while others say “give him time”. Fans overvaluing some of their young players.

I suspect that just about every team has fans with similar takes.

by poorwebguy on Dec 27, 2011 11:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't over value Babbitt at all.

I wish the Blazers would lose him.
Elliot Williams hasn’t seen enough court time to know anything.
And I don’t think Rudy was a late 1st round draft pick. He came from Phoenix didn’t he?

by Natsthecat on Dec 27, 2011 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

For a cool 3 million he did.

We bought the pick, and we picked him. Er… 24th I think? One spot ahead of Batum? In hindsight, if you get one really fun and productive season out of a 24th pick… was that enough to call it good?

Also, doesn’t every team have at least a couple of Nic Batums and Terry Porters in their history that fans cling to as examples of the Diamond In The Rough? We all want to see that sort of thing happen on our teams.

Speaking of which… Bless you Patty Mills, but I wish we had drafted Wesley Matthews instead. I’m trying hard not to calculate what we could have done in FA this year with Wesley on Patty’s contract.

In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.

by conspirator5 on Dec 28, 2011 12:12 AM PST up reply actions  

True-

and don’t forget that if we had of drafted Wes then he would’ve probably barely played under Nate anyway- I mean we had Roy at the 2 and Webster backing him up, and Rudy and I think Trout was still around too competing for minutes… I think he just found the right opportunity with Utah, and then an opportunity opened up for us (losing Webster for Babbitt), so I think it had to be the way it was.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 28, 2011 12:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep

The first time babbit was on the floor against real NBA talent it was VERY VERY obvioushe is way way way out of his depth.

Deer in headlights is the only description I have for him. He hustles hard on offense but offers less than nothing on defense at this level…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Good game tonite

Our starters were waaaaay better than their starters tonight and their bench was waaaaay better than ours. But I was stoked that Nate let the 2nd unit stay in as long as he did. For one they need court time together and for 2 he knew the starters could come back from the small hole the 2nd unit dug for them. Gerald Wallace is playing like he wants to be an all star. Hes certainly been our MVP for the first 2 games.

by cavejunctionblazer on Dec 27, 2011 11:13 PM PST reply actions  

He's playing like an all-star so far

He continues playing like this he just might make it.

by Wotan on Dec 27, 2011 11:34 PM PST up reply actions  

also contract year.

Same with Camby (if he doesn’t retire) and Felton.

by Natsthecat on Dec 27, 2011 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I couldn't see the game, or listen

But the box scores show our guys played professional defense. This Blazer team seems to have a lot more athleticism than previous editions.

by oregonslee on Dec 28, 2011 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah oregonslee, the eyeball test is agreeing with the box scores

They look very active and assertive on the defensive end of the floor.

by Wotan on Dec 28, 2011 1:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I missed most of the first half,

but in the second half I thought our bench did really well (with a couple of starters mixed in too). Nate even left them in longer than he normally would’ve too.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 28, 2011 12:47 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah

Craig Smith made a big difference on our second unit. He kept the paint clear. The second unit in the first half got torched though.

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Denver will be a tough test for these guys

Won’t be able to get away with having a first half like tonight. Good thing is at least Blazers get a day of rest while Denver gets a b2b on the road.

by poorwebguy on Dec 27, 2011 11:15 PM PST reply actions  

Will be interesting to see how that plays out.

The game against Philly was an up-tempo affair and tonight’s game seemed like a medium-tempo contest, so the run-and-gun Nuggets should make for an intriguing matchup. By running, Portland may very well play into Denver’s hands.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 12:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm sorry, I couldn't help myself.

But in my head I heard an evil laugh immediately after reading that statement. And then something about gimmicky defenses.

In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.

by conspirator5 on Dec 28, 2011 12:15 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm hoping conditioning and tired legs plays in our favor

Hard to say though as Denver is both deep and athletic. Not quite as old as we our either.

Also, a good chance Denver vs Utah is a laugher and Nugs get their starters plenty of rest. If Utah has anything in the tank at all I hope they use it up tomorrow.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Utah will be on the 2nd night of a back to back when playing Denver.

4 of Denver’s players are in China right now though..so not as deep as they will be…right?

Wilson Chandler(notes), Kenyon Martin(notes), J.R. Smith(notes) and Aaron Brooks(notes) are the four top NBA players under contract in China, and several sources involved in those contract entanglements said escape clauses won’t be allowed with the impending end of the NBA lockout.

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 12:27 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Felton's contibutions so far heve been undervalued....

He draws so much more attention than Dre ever did. Whether it is outside or inside, the other team has to stay with him. Plus he attacks the paint so much faster/harder than Dre even if he’s not a big finisher. It just opens things up more for everyone else. Fewer double teams or the double teams don’t come so fast.

#7

by clinchmobb on Dec 27, 2011 11:28 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Dre is gone, I'm happy. Now I'm giving Felton time to convince me he is our PGotF answer.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Dec 27, 2011 11:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree-

he has been criticised a bit for some mistakes and misses, but I think the Blazers play a much riskier brand of basketball at the moment, on offense and defense, and sometimes you lose. I think that we’ve seen the Blazer’s lose a lot of those risky plays, and still beaten their opponents- imagine what it will be like when we put it all together?

by simoninaustralia on Dec 28, 2011 12:52 AM PST up reply actions  

The killer is a botched behind the back pass

in the final minute of a closely contested game.

That will worry lots of folks and overshadow other more positive aspects of your play in fans minds…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:25 PM PST up reply actions  

When is the last time we had a PG that ran the pick and roll as well as Felton?

His defense isnt bad, he finds people in transition, he hits the set shot, and he gets to the rack.

by Kaanyr Vhok on Dec 28, 2011 2:25 AM PST up reply actions  

his late game decisions

are awful, but you´re right + he´s a much better defender than Dre

by Falcao on Dec 28, 2011 4:38 AM PST up reply actions  

sure, but a behind the back pass is a bad decision you should not make

with the game on the line, i do not care how fatigued you are…

That said, I do appreciate what Ray Ray brings to tthe table in general.

I thnk when our timing starts to come together he will only get stronger…

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Dec 28, 2011 7:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely agree

He’s missed some shots so far (we missed about 50 lay ups yesterday) but the offense looks so much better with him on the court than off and a lot of easy buckets are happening because he breaks the defense down. Wait until he gets in rhythm with the rest of the team before passing judgement.

by lickety brindle on Dec 28, 2011 9:29 AM PST up reply actions  

And don't forget his defense!

"Tom Lawson McCall, Governor or Oregon, invites you to visit . . . Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or Afghanistan." --Pair of bumper stickers on our baby blue 1966 Plymouth Fury III when I was growing up in Portland, BC (Before Championship).

by VTDuck on Dec 28, 2011 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Is the resurgence of the 6 on 5 play a good omen?

for the soon and safe return of a certain 7ft monster center?

by poorwebguy on Dec 27, 2011 11:28 PM PST reply actions  

I think we need to work on the execution. Last time we got to run the entire play.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Dec 27, 2011 11:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Someone needed to hide in the corner

and then cut for the rim as the play moved towards the basket. Hopefully Nate will get it fixed up.

by poorwebguy on Dec 27, 2011 11:37 PM PST up reply actions  

So far I'm convinced we could win a YMCA championship. Further predictions still pending.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Dec 27, 2011 11:36 PM PST reply actions  

I think we should try to trade for a backup PG

Ridnour perhaps

tl;dr - I just made profound statement.

by kHartos on Dec 27, 2011 11:36 PM PST reply actions  

Crawford does best at point when he has solid players with him

He let Nic take advantage of matchups in the second half. In the first half, Jamaal was trigger happy and attempting to carry the team.

Trust and look for each other

by Hermistonmelons on Dec 28, 2011 4:52 AM PST up reply actions  

if we are top 3 in the west...

and we have to 20 ppg scorers in wallace and aldridge, i could see it.

i don’t think this is very far fetched – it’s gonna be a weird year.

by SaveOden on Dec 28, 2011 7:15 AM PST up reply actions  

we need to list LA as a center on the ballot

not because he’ll win the fan vote, but because it might persuade more coaches to vote him at center when picking the reserves

"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave

by douglast on Dec 28, 2011 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Finally,

An enjoyable basketball team to watch in Portland! I really like the ball movement I’m seeing from these guys. I know the competition has been so-so, but we are playing around the rim! This is huge after the tedious jump-shot mediocrity of the last 4 years. Because of active passing, multiple threats and a non-selfish approach, I can see this team actually advancing in the playoffs.. Defensively we look scary good at times.

Early kudos to Paul Allen and Nate Mcmillen.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Dec 27, 2011 11:37 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Agreed!

"Brandon Roy has done this before."

by sabonis11 on Dec 27, 2011 11:39 PM PST up reply actions  

"Defensively we look scary good at times."

I still don’t see that.

Sacramento shot themselves in the foot offensively tonight. The Kings are disorganized beyond belief and it shows.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah even in the first half it was obvious

Kings have some work to do. We have some tough games coming up that will probably expose our defense real good and hopefully give the team a chance to adjust and get better,

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:09 AM PST up reply actions  

was at the game and the Blazers did step up their defense quite a bit

in the 3rd quarter.
Craig Smith actually blocks out…
Nick Batum was playing defense very well and so was Wallace.
Actually the whole team was playing good defense when Felton went out and Batum came in.

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

not that it means much

but we are currently 2nd in forcing turnovers. I think we are trapping and teams see Gerald Wallace coming and panic, plus they have been pretty opportunistic and the effort has been there. it’s easy to look good on defense though when Sacramento was playing like that on offense. That was just horrible offense

by Peteyhasnohead on Dec 28, 2011 12:43 AM PST up reply actions  

This team was second best in turnover percentage last season, too.

Portland’s biggest statistical flaw on defense is opponent shooting efficiency. Against Philadelphia, that reared its ugly head. Same thing occurred in the first half of tonight’s game against Sacramento, too. During the second half of last night’s game, it seemed like the Kings were discombobulated on offense — especially running Jimmer and Isaiah out there together for extended minutes — instead of anything special done by the Blazer defense.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 12:55 AM PST up reply actions  

think westphal tried lot of odd combinations that would normally be in preseason

especially with his younger players. just think sacremento needs a real point guard. they sort of had one in udrih but gave him away.

they have a roster just bristling with talent, but look utterely directionless for much of game with so much free lancing.

by utahcoyote on Dec 28, 2011 7:52 AM PST up reply actions  

no doubt

the stronger teams will expose our defense. But the D in the second half was, for stretches, intimidating. Not a word I’ve heard use to describe the Blazers D in a while.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Dec 28, 2011 12:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Come on AK-

just a little bit “scary good” at times? (even one or two times?)

by simoninaustralia on Dec 28, 2011 12:55 AM PST up reply actions  

totally

check out the pbp on this possession:

8:37 Kurt Thomas blocks DeMarcus Cousins’s layup 67-80
8:36 Isaiah Thomas offensive rebound 67-80
8:32 Wesley Matthews blocks Isaiah Thomas’s layup 67-80
8:27 Kurt Thomas blocks DeMarcus Cousins’s 13-foot jumper 67-80
8:27 DeMarcus Cousins offensive rebound 67-80
8:27 shot clock turnover

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Kurt Thomas is the man.

You don’t have to tell me that.

Collectively, though, there are flaws with opponent shooting efficiency and defensive rebounding. Even on that play, not cleaning up on the glass was an issue.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 1:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah that was actually pretty epic

I blame some of that on the Kings but still very cool to see. I was actually laughing like a mad man through that. Similar stuff happened for a few minutes there…like the Blazers weren’t even going to let the Kings shoot.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 1:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Wallace was magnificent last night.

If anyone should be extended, it’s him. Wallace is eligible for an extra two years tacked onto the end of his current deal, so long as he exercises his player option for next season in advanced. At a base salary of $9.5 million, I say lock Crash up through the 2014-2015 season.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 12:57 AM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't. I'd let him walk

He’s too dependent on athleticism and he’ll be 30 soon. Short term, Wallace is fantastic, but he won’t be worth nearly 10 million in a few seasons.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 1:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's not like he'll be 38 or something

Still, even losing half a step would kill his offensive game.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 1:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Guy knows where to be though

and fights like an animal for everything. I’m guessing that’s still very much a part of his game at 32. I’m also guessing he’s still running the court, rebounding and blocking shots respectably.

Maybe a few less offensive fouls though.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 1:17 AM PST up reply actions  

agreed

there is no way PA is throwing 60+ mil at two guys who play the same position.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 1:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, if I'm keeping one it's Batum for half the price.

Of course, I’m rooting for a roster overhaul this summer so that’s another reason I’d rather not extend Wallace.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 1:12 AM PST up reply actions  

reports from marc stein

just said ORL wants vets for Dwight.

if he’d sign an extension with us, i’d give em everybody outside of Nic and LA. or maybe even build a package involving LA.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

He'd leave for Dallas or New Jersey next summer.

Still, I’d trade LMA for one season of Dwight Howard if it brought a championship.

Doesn’t matter if Howard was a paid mercenary, because a title is a title. Just ask the ’97 Florida Marlins.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 2:03 AM PST up reply actions  

If the Blazers failed to win a ring then Howard would bolt

but I’ve got to think he’d stick around if the team won. How crazy would it be if he left immediately after winning a title?

So, IMHO, you only do the trade if you’re sure Howard signs an extension or if you can keep Aldridge in the deal.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 2:15 AM PST up reply actions  

"but I’ve got to think he’d stick around if the team won"

I think Dwight would bolt regardless.

He’d pat himself on the back for reaching the pinnacle in Portland during this truncated lockout-shortened season, then move on for the rest of his career.

Think Tyson Chandler, except on a grander scale.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 2:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Tyson Chandler is at the tail end of his career and the Mavs weren't keen on giving him one last big contract

Neither would be true for Howard in this hypothetical scenario. I just don’t picture Dwight Howard as an “I gotta play in the big city at the expense of winning titles” kind of guy.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 3:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I see him as that guy.

If he was strictly about winning rings, Howard would push to go to Chicago. Going to Chicago, however, would cut into his next shoe contract with Adidas, since Derrick Rose is the golden boy at that company and Howard would lose some marketability being in the same metropolitan area as him.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 3:29 AM PST up reply actions  

I do. I don't like Howard.

I think he does steroids.
It will come out when his body starts breaking down.

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

"So, IMHO, you only do the trade if you’re sure Howard signs an extension or if you can keep Aldridge in the deal."

I’d do it even if the plan was a ‘97 Marlins esque one-and-done run, which is followed up by an immediate tear down. Paul Allen can maybe even sell the team and die happy after winning that elusive Larry O’Brien Trophy.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 2:27 AM PST up reply actions  

999

Sorry, I’m inverted dyslexic.

The Marlins are the skidmark on the most hole-ridden underpants in the sock drawer of major league sports. Comparing the two is like comparing Old Faithful with Madonna. Sure they both put out regularly, but only one makes you feel like taking a shower with the heat all the way up.

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Dec 28, 2011 2:33 AM PST up reply actions  

The other is madonna

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Dec 28, 2011 2:35 AM PST up reply actions  

This would make for an interesting Fan Post, but I'm too lazy to ...

pen the write-up.

My philosophy is that pro sports are solely about winning a title. Do it by any means necessary, too.

As Al Davis said: “Just win, baby!”

Others, however, would subject themselves to repeated failure with a mess of aw-shucks, loveable losers rather than ever experience championship glory with a collection of hired guns.

And yes, I’d shack up with a 53-year-old Madonna for a one-nighter.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 2:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Let me know the results

A buddy and I have an over/under on HPV

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Dec 28, 2011 2:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Even with Howard the team wouldn't be a title favorite

and this lockout season will just be too wacky to have confidence that the team can gel in time after such a huge move

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 3:28 AM PST up reply actions  

This is true.

Which is why I ultimately wouldn’t do it.

That, by the way, is why no teams beyond the ones he’ll reportedly re-sign with — such as Los Angeles or New Jersey — are linked to him in trade talks.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 3:34 AM PST up reply actions  

If we wanted to keep LA we would have to take back Turkey Glue's contract

which would be hilarious for obvious reasons. I’m not sure if we have the contracts to pull that off without gutting the team.

There’s no way Howard would stay in small market Portland if his chance to win a title is only slightly better than in Orlando so the point of a trade like that would be to pair Aldridge and Howard to make the best big man tandem in the league.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 2:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Portland would need to part with LMA and also take back Hedo Turkoglu.

Otherwise, Orlando would hang onto Dwight Howard and make the run itself.

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7xbyvac

Would be worth making a legit push for a title, though. A single championship trophy — even if it’s won mercenary style without any homegrown players — is the one and only objective.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 2:33 AM PST up reply actions  

LMA + Oden > Howard

Oden represents a significant risk – but with the downside being LMA instead of Howard – it is a good risk to take.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 28, 2011 3:17 AM PST up reply actions  

I couldn't bring myself to give up Aldridge and take back Hedo's contract

without a guarantee of Howard extending. That’s a lot to risk in a shortened season.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 3:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed, but that's what it'd likely take.

And yeah, the likelihood of the reward (i.e., championship glory) is too slim to take the risk.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 3:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Did you really just say?

That even if Howard WOULD sign an extension in PDX you would not trade Nic, but you would LA? In what universe is Batum better than Howard?

by ebnerblazer on Dec 28, 2011 4:27 AM PST up reply actions  

I can't imagine Howard agreeing to come to Portland.

He’s a big-market player.

"Tom Lawson McCall, Governor or Oregon, invites you to visit . . . Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or Afghanistan." --Pair of bumper stickers on our baby blue 1966 Plymouth Fury III when I was growing up in Portland, BC (Before Championship).

by VTDuck on Dec 28, 2011 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, he'd just be a paid mercenary for this lockout-shortened season.

Once free agency came next July, he’d be on the first plane out of Portland.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 28, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

agree, people so willing to give oden money even though he never plays

but worried about wallace because of his playing style.

wallace is the real deal~~he plays hard, seems to like being here, and is reasonably priced. the energy he brings is contagious and that is a good thing

by utahcoyote on Dec 28, 2011 7:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

He and Aldridge are our most valuable players, and keeping Crash around will buy us time to develop younger players. Plus, just being on the same team as Crash may well encourage a tougher attitude in our youngs. Long term answer? Of course not, but a couple more years of Crash sounds just fine to me.

"Tom Lawson McCall, Governor or Oregon, invites you to visit . . . Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or Afghanistan." --Pair of bumper stickers on our baby blue 1966 Plymouth Fury III when I was growing up in Portland, BC (Before Championship).

by VTDuck on Dec 28, 2011 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

What???

Antonio Harvey just said on Talkin’ Ball that Dirk Nowitzki is “not a champion.” He got “lucky” b/c Dallas wouldn’t have won the title if it wasn’t for Jason Terry, JJ Barea, Jason Kidd, and the other players on Dallas. What? I’m not sure i’ve ever heard a more ridiculous comment in my entire life.
If we win the title this year is Lamarcas Aldridge not a champion b/c we have Gerald Wallace, Wesley Mathews, and Raymond Felton? What on earth is he talking about??? Can somebody please pay him to just go away.

by RiceIsNice on Dec 27, 2011 11:48 PM PST reply actions  

I think championships ought to speak for themselves.

One of my NBA pet peeves is how people don’t give Olajuwon credit for winning two titles just because of Jordan’s temporary retirement. He earned those titles, even if the circumstances had to be cleared a little.

No matter how good of a player you are, if you’re not surrounded by anybody, you won’t win championships.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 27, 2011 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Nowitzki made those players better

Still waiting to see if LaMarcus can do some of the same for his teammates.

—Dave

by Dave on Dec 28, 2011 12:18 AM PST up reply actions  

how long has Dirk been doing this?

I think LMA plays better defense than Dirk.
And I also think Tyson Chandler had a ton to do with making Dirk better.
Can you imagine how LMA would play if he had T Chandler in the middle?

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 12:31 AM PST up reply actions  

If the Blazers had Prz last year's playoffs

Chandler would have been ejected in the 14th minute.

They had a “thing”

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Dec 28, 2011 3:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Well said!

It’s a rare player, and a true leader, who can do that. I hope LaMarcus has it in him, but the leadership role doesn’t seem to come naturally to him. Oh, he’s accepted the role and he’s doing a fine job, but I got the feeling that Dirk WILLED that championship on the team.

"Tom Lawson McCall, Governor or Oregon, invites you to visit . . . Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or Afghanistan." --Pair of bumper stickers on our baby blue 1966 Plymouth Fury III when I was growing up in Portland, BC (Before Championship).

by VTDuck on Dec 28, 2011 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

From the recap
Craig Smith had a couple of moments on offense en route to 4 points in 8 minutes.

Chris Johnson had a couple of moments where he looked not ready to fill in for Camby en route to 2 points and 2 rebounds in 8 minutes.

While he was by no means the difference maker that Crash was, I think Craig Smith’s effect on the game deserved more than this tiny mention in the recap.

It was a night and day difference with Thomas + the Rhino in there during that stretch in the 2nd half compared to watching Chris Johnson in the 1st half. I do think CJ has a role in certain games and with certain matchups, but not tonight. Craig Smith was an absolute beast, and the 2nd unit really helped to put the game out of reach in the 2nd half.

And again, +/- doesn’t mean everything but CJ was -5 and C Smith was +9.

by The Cactus Leaguer on Dec 27, 2011 11:54 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

agreed

I thought Rhino’s run in the 2nd half was very underrated.

"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave

by douglast on Dec 27, 2011 11:57 PM PST up reply actions  

damn
Batum sounds lost.. He knows how well Wallace is playing.. And knows what it means.. I feel bad for him.. He’s a good player just wants more

1on1 convo w/ Batum “I feel like they don’t need me at times and it is frustrating.” All I could say is keep your head up… #Blazers

Dusty_Harrah

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:14 AM PST reply actions  

Guy has to learn how to assert himself

Nico would be a terror on the court if he would stop waiting for people to tell him where to fit in.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:19 AM PST up reply actions  

he's getting there

was really comfortable last year with rudy/patty/wes. i think losing his international buddies this year might be rough for him.

i keep harping on this, but i really think we’d be well suited putting him at 2 and letting him initiate the offense. he ran the P&R beautifully in france. he’d flourish if nate gave him the opportunity to run it with LA.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:26 AM PST up reply actions  

I think we can do it sometimes

against good teams though it might expose a lack of decent ball handling. Maybe cause a rash of turn overs or something.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:28 AM PST up reply actions  

his handle is very underrated.

but if the organization wants to invest big $ in him, they need to give him the opportunity to develop. and it’s not like playing him will cost us wins either, because the guy is good!

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe off the bench for a bit?

Leave Wallace in with Kurt, Nico, Crawford and maybe Craig?

Now that I think of it, We$ isn’t exactly a master ball handler either. Kind of tough to give us We$’ production though and weakens our bench I think to stick Batum in the starting line-up.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:32 AM PST up reply actions  

his handle isn't really any worse than Matthews'

"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave

by douglast on Dec 28, 2011 12:49 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah came to that conclusion above

Switching Wes and Nico though. I’m just not sure We$ can have the same effect from the bench. I know that Nico is kind of the same way though. I suspect we’ll lose some production but I guess we’ll see.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 1:04 AM PST up reply actions  

some truth here

but to be fair, he’s been bounced all over the place in his 4 years here – starting, not starting, corner, be more assertive, defer, don’t defer. He often goes long stretches without even touching the ball.

Honestly, our best lineups all seem to feature him AND Wallace together. gotta make that happen more often. Put me down as another vote for starting Nic at the 2.

"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave

by douglast on Dec 28, 2011 12:28 AM PST up reply actions  

yup

they key here is to keep him and gerald in the same lineup, moreso than starting nic @ the 2.

a lineup of jcross/wes/nic/gerald/aldridge could give teams fits defensively if they figure out the zone. and it’s very versatile on offense too.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:32 AM PST up reply actions  

I do like watching Nico and Crash play in the same line-up

I’m really hoping Crash rubs off on him a bit. I don’t like to see Nico so “fragile” I guess. He’s young but this whole team has been about flexibility for a couple seasons now. When a piece can’t “flex” without breaking down it makes things tougher for the team.

I don’t mind wherever he ends up. Starting or bench. 2 or 3. I’m just really hoping he finds that maturity that makes him more resilient about whatever role he is given.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:39 AM PST up reply actions  

when did Batum write this?

After tonight’s game?
Because he did contribute quite a bit tonight.
And he sounded upbeat in a post game interview!!!!

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 12:34 AM PST up reply actions  

How did we end up with Crash in his prime?

I thought Gerald Wallace was suppose to be in decline when we traded for him? He looks like all NBA and All-Star all wrapped up into one.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:21 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

good question, though arguably he was being asked to be more of a scorer

than he actually is with his previous team.

don’t think people thought he was in decline, as worried that his playing style might cause a career ending injury

by utahcoyote on Dec 28, 2011 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

what way?

we looked absolutely dominant defensively in the 2nd half. reminiscent of what miami did in the first half in their game tonight against boston.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:27 AM PST up reply actions  

my question exactly.

They are playing like a team that has had very minimal time to practice together with virtually no pre-season.
We may not be able to keep winning games playing this way, but I think the Blazers will be able to if they do.

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 12:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Get behind by double digits and then wait for Gerald Wallace to save the day. We got a ton of easy baskets because Jimmer

is such a bad defender and didn’t get back on defense. That’s not happening against the Thunder or even the Clippers.

by BRoyInThe4th on Dec 28, 2011 2:40 AM PST up reply actions  

we are who we are

a mid-playoff team that spreads the scoring around among 7 players, moves the ball, hustles, scraps, and is fun to watch.

"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave

by douglast on Dec 28, 2011 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

reminds me of the blazer teams with

sheed & co.

just needs more big man depth.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Dec 28, 2011 12:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Hopefully we settle down into some kind of rhythm

These are all still like pre-season games that count. I’m really surprised we’re doing as well as we are. I’m also kind of surprised we beat the 76ers yesterday.

by poorwebguy on Dec 28, 2011 12:42 AM PST up reply actions  

the 76ers played some really good defense.

Heard they may end up 4th in the East.
They were definitely better than Sacramento.

by Natsthecat on Dec 28, 2011 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I think the shooting will pick up a little when guys shake that off season rust

Same for the new acquisitions, Felton and Crawford. They’ll get used to the team and they’ll look better in a few games. A little more scoring punch from the guards and the game will open up for Aldridge as well.

#7

by Magnum on Dec 28, 2011 1:09 AM PST reply actions  

hear ya

these guys need a little more time. I think you have an over excitement going on in their head and they all want to be involved in the success so bad. I think once they settle in, things we’ll be fine. We all know these guys can play with anyone in the leage every night.

by MPP24 on Dec 28, 2011 8:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Aldridge looked like a star all night

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Dec 28, 2011 2:01 AM PST reply actions  

Ger-ald Wal-lace clap clap clap clap clap

I really hope management realizes this guys value as much as the rest of the league doesn’t, granted GW realizes if we were gonna get 3-4 1st rd. Picks for him then you gotta do it but " the apocalypse" aka " the predator" aka crash with LA is that 1-2 punch that we had with Brandon but LA is more mature and ready to step into that roll as the #1 option, I hope we resign GW even though nic is waiting in the wings, I honestly think he should be the starter until that body can’t hold up and nic can get his time at the 2 and 3. Besides our lack of depth in the frontcourt and our streaky shooting in the backcourt I’m really starting to get excited about this blazer team

by trax639 on Dec 28, 2011 2:49 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

I think we'll hear that chant a few more times....

I said it earlier but seeing GW post up next to a fan in the front row to chat during a timeout was awesome last night. The dude is loving P-Town!

#7

by broden on Dec 28, 2011 7:27 AM PST up reply actions  

and with that

I should say I hope management realizes GW’s worth to our team as the rest of the league didn’t realize his worth at the trade deadline

by trax639 on Dec 28, 2011 3:17 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Amen.

Without him this year, we’d be average, Batum or no Batum. You can’t teach a motor like Wallace has. With Roy out and Aldridge and Mac insisting that he plays his game, and that the team will adjust to him, not him to the team, we may see him have his best year. His last year at Charlotte was mired in changes and controversy given that he, Felton and Chandler were all traded or on the block – and knew it. Come next summer, the Blazers will have some interesting choices to make. I don’t buy into the idea that Wallace can’t be effective for another 4-5 years. At the same time, Mac needs to find a slot for Batum that fits with Aldridge/Wallace, who are clearly the talents on the Blazers.

by ebenc on Dec 28, 2011 4:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Wallace at the 3 and Batum at the 2

these are guaranteed mismatches every game. Batum can handle any guard you put in front of him. Start Batum at the two. I like the bench with Mathews at the 2 and Crawford at the point.

by MPP24 on Dec 28, 2011 8:34 AM PST reply actions  

I am not totally against that.

But who rotates in for Crash? I see this resulting in Batum or Crash going out early.

Also, last night was a small sample against jimmer and a few others. I think Nic can handle most. But it remains to be seen if he has developed NBA 2 Handles like Pippen did

Trust and look for each other

by Hermistonmelons on Dec 28, 2011 9:02 AM PST up reply actions  

undersized rookie guards

Can we please stop giving Jimmer and Zeke so many minutes? They were getting killed last night. When u go small, u shouldn’t get beat in transition so much. Hope Garcia gets off the bench next game. This small lineup is not working defensively.

by MrMLo42 on Dec 28, 2011 9:47 AM PST via iPhone app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm