Game 1 Recap: Trail Blazers 107, 76ers 103
In a Nutshell: The Blazers hold on to defeat a hard-nosed Sixers squad in a game that showcased nearly every strength and weakness Portland fans can expect to experience this season.
Game Flow:
The Blazers opened their season on a positive note behind the attack of forward Gerald Wallace. Other Blazers scored inside off of offensive rebounds but Wallace was the lone voice in the wilderness scrambling for the hoop and making things happen. His teammates fed off of his energy and confidence, hitting an array of face-up shots between 5 and 15 feet plus the occasional deep ball. Portland's screening was particularly efficient in freeing up jumpers throughout the first half. The Blazers also started a night-long trend of looking to push off of the defensive rebound, spinning and firing outlet passes instead of dumping down to the point guard on the sideline after opponent misses. Defensive intensity was also high against a streaky Philadelphia offense...the streak in this case being downward. Impeccable rebounding sealed the deal. The combination of speed, energy, veteran fundamentals, and a few made jumpers off the slip propelled the Blazers to a 26-15 lead after one.
Then the bench came in.
Coach McMillan showed incredible confidence in his reserves for the first (and likely last) time this season, running a lineup of Nolan Smith, Jamal Crawford, Nicolas Batum, Kurt Thomas, and Chris Johnson at the beginning of the second period. That lineup got killed by Philly's superior scoring bench players Lou Williams and Thaddeus Young. The lead evaporated faster than Christmas Joy on Returns Day. Fortunately the Blazers kept their receipt on that bench lineup and managed to exchange it for the same old starting corps before Philadelphia overtook them, but the margin was down to 3 halfway through the period. Rebounding woes and a lack of interior scoring kept Portland from succeeding but forcing turnovers without committing them kept Portland in the game. The same formula of transition when possible, picks otherwise plus some well-timed hoops from Crawford and LaMarcus Aldridge proved enough of a life-preserver to maintain a 48-44 lead going into the half.
Wesley Matthews was the story of the third period early, hitting back-to-back threes. Wallace followed that up with forced offensive fouls on Philly and some more opportunity buckets as the Blazers' first unit surged ahead again. Wallace was once again the only consistent inside scorer, though, and rebounding remained sketchy, all but disappearing on the offensive end and coming only with serious effort defensively. Portland did get the chance to run, but not long enough. Having fewer rebounding problems themselves, Philly now played confidently, running the ball themselves. The result was a 29-28 quarter with the Blazers upping their lead by 1, 77-72 heading into the deciding period.
Great energy plus made three pointers equaled Blazer success as the fourth quarter began. Portland stretched the lead to 15 with 7:35 remaining on a Wallace three and kept it there for a couple minutes as Batum hit another. Portland went cold at the end of the game, however, making only one field goal (that from Thomas) in the final six minutes of the game, trying to eke a living at the foul line. Philly, meanwhile, started hitting opportunity shots and rebounding even harder. Worse, their three-pointers started falling as well. Soon the lead was under double digits and fell to three with 30 seconds remaining. The Sixers had an attempt at a tying jumper late but Andre Iguodala couldn't hit it and Raymond Felton iced the game with 1.2 seconds left. Portland holds on to win by 4, 107-103.
Take-Away Points
As I said in the opening, this game was a microcosm of everything we expect to see from the "new" Blazers:
- With more veteran defenders in tow Coach McMillan has taken the reins off of the defense, allowing his players--particularly Wallace--the freedom to go for the steal and take risks on the perimeter instead of just containing. This is positively affecting both tempo and energy.
- Those same veteran players are setting and using better picks than we've seen from the Blazers in years.
- Portland's mid-range game is exquisite on offense, particularly with those screens.
- Portland's long-range game is not. When they hit the three they almost can't help but win. Most times they don't hit though.
- The interior game is limited to offensive rebounds and occasional drives by Wallace or deep posts by Aldridge. The Blazers can get their feet and the ball inside at the same time but they can't convert consistently in there. Mike and Mike from the Blazer Broadcasting team lamented that the Blazers were just "missing good opportunities". Get used to that. It's endemic to most of the players the Blazers field.
- With this style the Blazers have trouble drawing foul shots (understandably so) and likely will for the majority of the season.
- They make up for that disadvantage in part by forcing turnovers without committing them. The real issue will come when they either have an off night themselves and spill the ball or come up against a team that's unwilling to make mistakes.
- When the Blazers rebound they have a chance. When they don't they're like a slowly leaking balloon.
- Portland feeds off of energy and teamwork.
- Transition basketball is one hallmark of that energy. That said, when forced to walk the Blazers look pedestrian.
- The problem with the energy approach is their lack of depth. The second unit isn't ready for sustained NBA basketball. Injuries, season-fatigue, and certain demanding spots in the schedule are bound to create trouble.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge led the Blazers with 25 points on 11-25 shooting. There's no overestimating how much better Portland's halfcourt offense looks when Aldridge succeeds inside. Defenses have to collapse on him which opens up the floor for everyone else. The game looks easy at that point. The Catch-22 is that Aldridge needs the face-up shot to fall in order to set up his scoring confidence. The Blazers can't afford to send him inside for missed shot after missed shot either because they need his point production to stay afloat. Elton Brand is not a fantastic defender at this point in his career so Aldridge caught a break after a shaky start and dominated the game with his jumper. But Portland needs to find a way to set him up better inside when he faces better defenders or this story will not end well. The halfcourt alley-oop is sorely missed at this point. Aldridge also has to buckle down and just hit those inside shots from the post.
Gerald Wallace was fluid and somehow maniacal while remaining in control tonight. He was the hammer that smashed the face of the 76ers, stunning them enough to make Portland's other attacks tell. His 21 points and 9 rebounds shone brightly but this was the kind of night when you would have wanted him on the floor even had he scored 6. He was that forceful on both ends.
Marcus Camby had 13 rebounds and 6 assists, the latter while playing up high. This was classic "little bit of everything" Marcus, including nice defense (natch). The worry-spot for the Blazers is that the team wasn't nearly the same without him on the floor. They need Marcus a scary amount right now.
Wesley Matthews went 3-6 from the three-point arc tonight but only 1-8 otherwise, another culprit in the "missing the 'easy' shot" epidemic. The thing is, inside shots aren't easy for Matthews by definition. On the plus side he played great defense, looking plenty agile no matter who he was on.
Despite a bad shooting night Raymond Felton mixed 12 points, 8 assists, and 6 rebounds into a casserole of decentness. Like Matthews he was able to get inside but had a hard time converting when he did. No individual part of his game was that tasty but when blended together it came out well.
Jamal Crawford had an iffy start off the bench but kept on gunning and found the range when it counted. He's the one Blazer you can count on to try and win the game instead of mostly not losing it. He just looks at the ball and the hoop and says, "These are mine." If you had three players like that you'd go crazy and probably win 33% of your games but having one is actually a relief. He scored 12 on 5-10 shooting and added 4 rebounds and 4 assists.
Nicolas Batum went 4-10 for 10 points, deferring repeatedly to other players late. His defense was good as usual. His offense actually looked pretty good too when he went for it. The big development in the three games we've seen so far this year has been his extra rebounding intensity...sorely needed on this team. Still he can't allow himself to get overshadowed by more assertive players.
Kurt Thomas played 14 minutes and didn't hurt the team.
Chris Johnson and Nolan Smith got a couple minutes apiece and that was enough.
Stats of the Game
The Blazers spanked the Sixers in field goal percentage in the first half but ended up in a 41%-48% hole by the end of the game.
Turnovers made up a large part of the difference. Philly committed 20, Portland 12.
The Blazers shot 47.4% from the three-point arc thanks to their fourth-quarter flurry. The scary part is that they needed that flurry to win.
Ditto the free throws. Portland ended up shooting 23 to Philly's 19 but that was a fourth-quarter, catch-up phenomenon. The Blazers had fewer free throws than right-hand fingers in the first half. Good teams would have had the Blazers hogtied and rotating on a spit by the halftime horn with that kind of production.
Portland 17 offensive rebounds, Philadelphia 9.
Final Thoughts
1-0 looks good. Portland's energy and camaraderie looked even better. It's likely that the combination of spunk and enjoying playing together will rescue a couple of games this season that the Blazers would otherwise lose because of their lack of full-dimensional play. Classic Portland drive and attitude should appeal to Portland fans no matter what the ultimate record.
Check out the reflections at LibertyBallers.
Reiterating from the preview: the Jersey Contest won't start until after January 1st.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Somebody mentioned it in the other thread,
but how does everybody feel about LMA getting 42 minutes, especially with the team playing again tomorrow night? We all know this year’s schedule is more tightly packed than normal, but this isn’t something I’m really okay with happening every night.
"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth
by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 26, 2011 11:02 PM PST reply actions
Welcome to your 2011-12 Portland Trail Blazers
Your next alternative for a key scorer is Jamal Crawford. Odds are you don’t want to rely on him to save the game every night. The Blazers need LaMarcus to play long minutes and if they want to win they have to ride him until he can’t do it.
—Dave
Ideally I suppose
you’d build a big enough lead by the end of the third quarter that you could spare LMA the 4Q minutes. That’s the Golden Snitch for the season. How often the Blazers catch it may determine how often they’re able to win as this season grows old.
—Dave
LMA was gassed and didnt score in the 4th considering his schedule thats understandable gotta get his minutes lower but still need to help him get his conditioning back as well however Crawford made his presence felt in the 4th quarter of his first game
The Blazers controlled things for most of the first three quarters, building as big as a 13-point lead, but never could quite bury the gritty 76ers. And with roughly 10 minutes left in the game, the Blazers led just 79-74. Then Crawford took over.
He swished a three pointer. He added a driving layup. He passed to Matthews for an assist on a jumper, lobbed a crazy, behind-the-back pass to a streaking Wallace — as he was falling out of bounds — and added another assist to Wallace on a three-pointer.
In the blink of an eye, the Blazers led 92-77 as Crawford had a hand in 11 of the Blazers’ 13 points. With less than six minutes remaining, after a 17-5 run, the Blazers led 96-80 and the game was well in hand.
http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/index.ssf/2011/12/portland_107_philadelphia_103_trail_blazers_sprint.html
by Willie Beamon on Dec 26, 2011 11:43 PM PST up reply actions
I said it in the post game
LMA was out almost all trainingg camp and only had the one pre-season game….he needed those minutes to shake the rest of that rust off. Tomorrow I think will be more balanced (hopefully).
by lcmonkey05 on Dec 26, 2011 11:24 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Jamal didnt seem iffy to me
Shot 50 percent overall, 66 percent from three, scored 12 points in 22 minutes had 4 rebounds and 4 assists against 0 turnovers. The stat you also left out was his 4 steals. Pretty stat stuffing for 22 minutes. I would have liked him in there late shooting FTs over Felton, but what can you do.
Player of the game IMO was Marcus Camby. Beautiful 29 minutes of work from the old man.
I agree
I felt that jamal played as well as we can hope and that Marcus was a huge part of this win
Also I dont know why I continue to read the analysis on Blazersedge I am begin to feel more and more like Dave is off base.
Also, I love Camby's passing.
Wish he gave 15 minute lessons every day before practice to all the other bigs on the team. Heck, most of the guards too.
Here is the direct quote:
“Jamal Crawford had an iffy start off the bench but found the range when it counted.”
Here are Crawford’s contributions off the bench in his first eight minutes of play, spanning the first and second periods:
Commits personal foul, his man scores on him, gets the token end-of-quarter defensive rebound, misses jumper, misses layup before finally hitting two shots just before he exits the game. He did not score in his return to the court in the second quarter. He had a good second half.
As I said in the recap, he ended up 5-10 for 12 points which is a great percentage and a good outing. I’m not sure how any of that is inaccurate.
—Dave
actually a direct quote would be
Jamal Crawford had an iffy start off the bench but kept on gunning and found the range when it counted
.
by Willie Beamon on Dec 27, 2011 8:07 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Dave said "started iffy"
which I agree with.
And as far as all of the “off base” stuff that I keep hearing I really think its the opposite. I do believe there’s a different tone to Dave’s writing which a lot of people are interpreting as overly negative and “off base”. But really its just a reflection that the ceiling of this team has changed without Roy. Where before when the Blazers rebounded well they were nearly unbeatable now its accurate to say “When the Blazers rebound they have a chance. When they don’t they’re like a slowly leaking balloon.” because the lack of elite talent means there’s less room for error. Where before role player level performances were laudable because that’s what was necessary for this team to be great. Now its accurate to qualify role player level performances by saying more is needed. The same things don’t mean the same things anymore.
It only seems off-base if you read it without an appreciation of the new context the Blazers are in. Which is a very good team (and better than last year) that can win a round in the playoffs but that needs some sort of major change to be great.
Just because Dave has made this realization sooner than the majority of Blazer nation doesn’t make him “off base” but rather much more grounded and objective. It’s just kinda hard to read sometimes, from an emotional standpoint, because of what agreeing with it means. But hey, that’s just one man’s opinion.
by wilson7117 on Dec 27, 2011 12:25 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
exactly. If anything Dave was right on
this is an analysis, not by any means an overly-optimistic dream of something that will never be. Crawford can be good, and at times very good, but he did not single handedly change the game for us. He was efficient, however, that was because of some nice 4th quarter time where he hit both the 3 and the layup in rapid succession.
I find myself agreeing with most of what Dave says. Even if you disagree, these recaps are just one man’s analysis, not omnicient statements.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:31 AM PST up reply actions
at best, they're partially-semi-omniscient
and when do we get the media reports? is that Ben’s thing?
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:46 AM PST up reply actions
I'll take it
Ben’s report from the Rose Garden almost always gets posted later, as he has to compile quotes and such.
—Dave
geez
don’t you understand, I need my fix now!
What am I, some sort of pleasure-delayer?
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 1:03 AM PST up reply actions
Hellllooooooo Emeka Okafor!
goodbye Batum/ Armon/ Camby (or some sort of combination of those 3 plus change)
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 1:19 AM PST up reply actions
Oden looked like he was in good spirits at the game
Was moving around good, too.
I want news, dangit. The media blackout on Oden is astounding in its efficacy.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Dec 27, 2011 1:23 AM PST up reply actions
Usually what happens
is at the beginning of the season when everybody’s hopes and expectations soar I get called pessimistic, depressing, or too logical and news-like. Then usually (not always but usually) the Blazers end up somewhere in that realistic bracket, often hitting a rough patch or two along the way that shakes people up. About that time everybody starts metaphorically jumping off of bridges. Then the same kind of analysis I’m giving gets called “Pollyanna”, rose-colored, or too emotional and fan-like. In the end I just say what I see and I almost always end up at least with a base hit even on those occasions it’s not a complete home run. Far, far, far more often than not you can tell exactly what’s going on with the Blazers—sometimes well before the rest of the world has gotten around to the realization—by reading right here. As long as that continues, I’m good with it no matter what anyone else wants to call it.
—Dave
what is this logic?!?!
Clearly the obvious answer is that you’re too optimistic and pessimistic at the same time about the same things.
Either way i intend to complain about, swear off and then continue to obsessively read BE.
but he did not single handedly change the game for us
no but he came awfully close its amazing how ridiculously biased some of you are . Ignore what actually happens and write stuff that simply matches your predictions .
In the blink of an eye, the Blazers led 92-77 as Crawford had a hand in 11 of the Blazers’ 13 points. With less than six minutes remaining, after a 17-5 run, the Blazers led 96-80 and the game was well in hand.
by Willie Beamon on Dec 27, 2011 8:10 AM PST up reply actions
You miss quoted him
If you quote him at least do it right: “iffy start” Iffy start the way I, and I think others, took it was an iffy start to the season. If he said “started iffy, then came on strong” it would have been much clearer exactly what he was stating IMO.
Great post, thanks for the perspective
formerly known as Matthews vs. Roy... fight!
by Respect_these_years on Dec 27, 2011 6:23 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I don't get this ceiling thing.
If anything, this team has a higher ceiling than the teams of the last 3 years. We have been handled 3 straight years in the playoffs. And by handled, I mean we were structurally incapable of winning with the squad we had. Because our opponents could shut down our one-dimensional offense and turn us in to a jump shooting team. Now that is a ceiling.
Surely others noticed how many shots we got around the rim last night? That is huge, and the result of a dynamic team-centered offense. Yea, we might not have the talent to win it all, but for the last 3 years, we haven’t had the team to win it all. I think our ceiling is now higher.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
Too much playing time for Matthews, scarce minutes for Batum.
by prostofen on Dec 26, 2011 11:19 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Batum had 21 or 22 minutes and I thought, played very well.
Would like to see him play more and he probably will tomorrow..well tonight now!!
Batum sat too much in the first half for my taste
but the second half rotation looked pretty solid except for some of the late minutes Crawford was getting in the situational stuff. Batum is more versatile and a better shot, and should get those situational minutes.
However, Crawford did a decent job on defense tonight.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Dec 27, 2011 12:34 AM PST up reply actions
Same old Blazers Philly matchup
Portland gets and blows a big lead late in the game – maybe Philly comes back to win, maybe they don’t. It’s 50/50 whether we hang on or blow it. Not a bad sloppy win for the first game.
LMA just needs to shake off the rust
He’ll get more balanced minutes as the season progresses.
Porter, Drexler, Kersey, Williams, Duckworth. The greatest starting 5 ever.
Really looked like he hit a wall in his conditioning
He caught fire into the first quarter and looked like he wore out later on in the game.
Yeah..the post game radio show host was dissing LMA's game.
Was pissing me off. He also needs to get used to playing with Felton.
Was it a coincidence that Wallace played so well when he and Felton HAVE played together in the past.
It does make a difference…knowing your point guard.
And LMA will.
Also the Phili blog made a good point in that LMA didn’t HAVE to go near the basket all that much when :
They doubled Raymond Felton and Gerald Wallace far too much, which freed up Wesley Matthews and Nicolas Batum. LMA deserved one, but because of all the open looks, he didn’t spend much time near the basket in the low block anyway. Collins needs to find some practice time to work on those rotations.
Exciting game (almost too exciting at the end). Lots of notes:
-Starting with Felton: I though he looked exactly like what I expected, minus some better shooting. Good floor vision (8 assists) , good basketball IQ, can shoot (however, 4 for 14 looked bad) and knockdown the 3 ball (ok, he had an 0fer, but that likely won’t continue), and has intensity (tied for most foul shots) and rebounding prowess (6 rbs) with only 3 turnovers (and honestly, he looked sloppy at times). I think he’ll improve vastly over the first 12 games of the season.
-Jamal looked good beginning the second half. He knocked down a couple important 3s (2 for 3 shooting) and had some nice layups, w/ 4 assists and 4 rebounds. Though he can shoot you out of games (as seen in Atlanta) he can also keep you in games and hit that dagger that breaks the spirit of the opposing team. His floor vision was nice and unexpected.
-Aldridge was good (25pts) yet a little rough around the edges. He will probably play high minutes over the length of the season (he had 32 mins by the end of the 3rd quarter), but not every game. It was important to win this one.
-Camby was ultra-efficient at everything tonight (6pts, 6asst, 13 rbs) and Wallace all over the place with intensity.
-Everyone else was as expected (Batum, Matthews, KT). The young guys will end up receiving more minutes than they got tonight, and we’ll probably continue to rely on Kurt and Marcus for a good amount of mins a game (45mins or so between them).
-There were too many turnovers at the end of the game between Wallace and Felton.
-There are too few offensive threats on the floor when the entire second unit takes over. You’ve got to keep a couple of the starters on the floor to ease the second unit in.
-Good 3pt shooting, and we’ll need it to keep defenses honest this season. Decent rebounding, but we made up for it with great offensive rebounding.
-Honestly, I was impressed with Nate McMillan. He made good decisions throughout the game.
Also, I probably would have either won the Jersey Contest tonight or finished 279th as per usual.
Looking forward to tomorrow’s Sacramento game.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:02 AM PST reply actions
btw
the ‘spunk’ sentence set up a hilarious and somewhat deviant ’that’s-what-she-said’ [TWSS] that I refuse to post here in the comments (though I’ve typed it out several times)
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:08 AM PST up reply actions
Not a Felton fan in this game
The last two minutes of the game… 3 turnovers i think. 2 missed free throws. And bad defense.
He also rushed all of those shots he took. He almost handed them the game.
I expect and hope more out of him.
by foxtrotportland on Dec 27, 2011 12:09 AM PST up reply actions
Looked like we we're still pushing the ball a bit too close the game
Then the Nate time out. Nate probably telling them to slow it down and run some clock unless there’s a clear advantage on the break.
Why is Nolan Smith getting burn over Elliott Williams?
Especially if scoring is needed? Especially if Crawford is running the point?
Nolan only got 3 mins; Elliott will likely see some time tomorrow against Sactown
however, Elliott does not exactly equate to points. It is still relatively unknown what he can produce in his minutes.
Crawford was pretty effective at the point tonight, though obviously Felton’s vision is better, and his distribution capabilities far greater.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:14 AM PST up reply actions
Crawford makes a decent backup point
However, I’m also looking forward to seeing Williams play some decent minutes. Pregame, Williams was hitting his 3’s, working off feeds from Mathews, who would close on Williams with a hand in his face. I liked what I saw.
Speaking of pregame – Batum’s hands look huge when he shoots. Another guy who was working hard on his outside shooting.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Dec 27, 2011 12:26 AM PST up reply actions
If E-Will's pre-season minutes are anything to go on
he is a very efficient scorer for a rookie. Plus, I can’t imagine watching an entire season from the front row isn’t helpful in understanding the NBA game.
Some perspective from the stands:
*Felton looked plenty quick – with good handles. Seemed like (early in the game) he could push the opposing guards anywhere he wanted off the dribble. He used that to set up good sets. Later in the game, you could tell he was gassed.
*LMA was getting burned on the 5th-quarter post game show (750) for not getting double digit rebounds. But – like Felton – LMA was ‘gassed’ in the fourth. He was only looking to set picks up top, content to let the guards penetrate rather than dive at the hoop. Didn’t like any of LMA’s top of the key-right-side J’s….His turnaround and step back and corner of the key J’s were money, though. Not nearly enough points in the paint for him.
*Wallace is crazy. Crowd gave him a lot of love for it, too.
*Batum and Mathews both have 40% three point capability. They are the two that will stretch the floor consistently – and they are the two that will make or break the season with that shooting.
*Crawford seems to feed off the crowd; looks good as the third guard in a three guard rotation. Rebounded better than I thought he would. Didn’t look as exposed on D as I thought he would.
*Camby has a little crazy in him, too.
*Defense looked really solid. Help defense and rotations out to shooters better than I anticipated. Blazers did a good job harassing ball handlers. Defense got a little lax late in the game – seemed like the Blazers were coasting to a victory. Probably had more than a little to do with conditioning.
*Blazers are long. They do good things with that length.
*Philadelphia is better than Dave seems to give them credit for (“Good teams would have had the Blazers hogtied and rotating on a spit by the halftime horn with that kind of production”?) Philly didn’t foul – and played better inside defense than most teams will play – yet the Blazers were just fine. I don’t see “good teams” dominating the Blazers by not fouling. The Blazers attack. Philly just seemed to get their hands on a lot of balls and block more than their fair share.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
please elaborate on Camby's crazy!!
Was at the game and he looked good. What did he do that was crazy? I know you meant it in a good way!
Yeah, Philly looked great on D.
"I Am Mine"
by AK1984 on Dec 27, 2011 12:29 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
And, as much as I hate to paraphrase the Mikes
Their bench did a lot of damage against us. Philly is one of the deepest teams in the league. Few teams have the ability to bring guys like Thad Young, Evan Turner, and Lou Williams off the bench.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Those three made Philly a better team
Felt that way at the game; confirmed by the stats….
Good size, lots of quickness/speed….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Dec 27, 2011 12:45 AM PST up reply actions
sweet, Sweet Lou!
nice offensive game.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:48 AM PST up reply actions
Camby blocked a guy at one point
and was caught on the jumbotron putting his “game face” on….got the crowd riled up :)
He plays with a bit of a mean streak on defense…
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Dec 27, 2011 12:28 AM PST up reply actions
i think he said something like
get that bleepin bleep outta here
Can I say bleepin bleep?
by cavejunctionblazer on Dec 27, 2011 12:50 AM PST up reply actions
Once Elton Brand gets back to form
the Sixers are going to be scary.
I also was surprised at the lack of respect given to Philly by Dave. I saw a pretty good looking team.
by SacredG on Dec 27, 2011 2:01 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
Good thing we don't play them again this season
Looks like the lockout gave us an elusive series sweep of the 76ers.
A good first game with a pretty "W" attached to it.
I wish we coulda finished more solidly, but a win is a win! I’ll take it and be happy. I think OKC will be our first big test of the season, maybe LAC…
Notes:
LMA looked good to me.
Wallace for scrapper of the year
Camby played like a vet
Wes and Batum, hittin when it mattered
Ray gettin some dimes
Jamal helped a little bit too
Camby was the 2nd best pg on the team with 6 ast! plus 13 rebs!
Crawford had 4 steals
Wallace won this game for us with his scrappy performance
LMA had the best stat line of the night
by cavejunctionblazer on Dec 27, 2011 12:49 AM PST reply actions
speaking of the '76ers
Spencer Hawes just missed a triple double for the 76ers, with 10 points, 14 rebounds and 9 assists.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:52 AM PST reply actions
this team has to find another big somewhere some how.
Kenneth Lewis Moore
by lightskin350 on Dec 27, 2011 12:53 AM PST via mobile reply actions
90% of the teams in the league need to find another big.
it’s pretty hard, as the picking is slim in the 7-footer department. I’d take just abut anybody right now, including a healthy Przy (but not an unhealthy Przy!)
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 12:58 AM PST up reply actions
that mad scramble by Iggy and Sweet Lou to make it a game at the end was ridiculous
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Dec 27, 2011 12:53 AM PST via mobile reply actions
yeah
i wish we coulda finished more solidly
by cavejunctionblazer on Dec 27, 2011 12:53 AM PST up reply actions
can we trade Babbitt for Lou?
lol
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Dec 27, 2011 1:00 AM PST up reply actions
and Armon for Iggy?
Then we’d just need to find a way to get 8 guys on the court for the last couple of minutes!
by simoninaustralia on Dec 27, 2011 1:34 AM PST up reply actions
That game was a hell of a lot of fun to watch.
That was a lot more interesting than watching isolation after isolation … if nothing else I think this season is going to provide some super entertaining games.
Some of them cats are felonious, man.
by Rasheed's Lament on Dec 27, 2011 4:23 AM PST reply actions
Good win - but
the lack of a preseason and time to practice affected both teams – as well as other teams around the league. They’re all putting up with some sloppy play and players who are not yet in game shape. Felton and Aldridge need more time to get their conditioning down, and we’re still integrating Felton, Wallace, Thomas and Crawford with Aldridge, Batum, Matthews and Camby. Hard to believe that 1/2 of our rotation has played together such a short period of time. I for one am trying not to read too much into these early games – which in a normal year would be little more than pre-season match-ups. Teams with little change in their starting rotations will look a little more polished for awhile, and those with substantial changes will be up and down. I thought the 4th quarter for Portland was little more than a reflection of the fact that Felton and Aldridge were tired, and Crawford has only been around a few days.
But, I think this will be a fun team to watch going forward.
seriously? lol
…when forced to walk the Blazers look pedestrian.
When forced to ride a horse …I look equestrian
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
by 92wastheyear on Dec 27, 2011 6:54 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
indeed
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
by 92wastheyear on Dec 27, 2011 12:49 PM PST up reply actions
think that it would be good to schedule breaks for aldridge at the
end of first and third quarters automatically. let him sit into the second and fourth quarters as the game dictates. you take him out 9 min into the first and third quarters automatically, unless foul trouble elsewhere prevents it.
he is physically in his prime, but he doesnt need to play 42 min games. he does wear down as we saw end of last season
I hope...
People notice that Felton did have a pretty decent game. I’m afraid that fact will be overshadowed by his final 2 minutes.
That behind the back pass? Was such a bad play…and such an untimely and unneeded turnover that I think it overshadows what for the most part was a good game.
For Felton, he simply must be happy The Blazers got the “W”….and it’s on to the next game.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by 

































