Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

FULL TRANSCRIPT: BLAZERS OWNER PAUL ALLEN GIVES RARE INTERVIEW TO PORTLAND MEDIA

Portland Trail Blazers owner Paul Allen addressed a small group of media members in one of the Rose Garden's auxiliary locker rooms prior to the team's preseason opener against the Utah Jazz on Monday night.

Allen spoke for 35 minutes and requested, through a team employee, that no video or photographs be taken during the interview. Allen discussed his decisions to fire former GMs Rich Cho and Kevin Pritchard, whether he would consider selling the Blazers, his current health and his thoughts on Acting GM Chad Buchanan and coach Nate McMillan. He also discussed the NBA's new Collective Bargaining Agreement at length and responded to criticism levied at him by National Basketball Players Association executive director Billy Hunter and NBPA counsel Jeffrey Kessler.

Click through for the full transcript. It has now been fully updated. This is a must-read.

Here's my column on the conversation.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Star-divide

Questions are bolded and paraphrased; Allen's answers are word-for-word and in blockquote.

Opening Remarks

"We haven't talked in a long time and a lot of things have happened so I thought I would give you guys a chance to ask questions and get my perspective on things."

How are you feeling about the team?

"You know I think we've got a lot of talent. Adding Jamal [Crawford] helps. Raymond [Felton] is a different style of point guard than we've had. We've got [Craig] Smith and Kurt Thomas to give us some toughness. We'v got returning players and then some x-factors like Elliot Williams and it's going to be interesting to see what Nolan [Smith] does as a back-up point guard. I'm always excited for the season to start."

Will you sell the team?

"I have no plans to sell the team."

Your health

"Good. Good. I have periodic check-ups coming up in January but so far everything has been clean. Obviously I've gone through a lot of stuff these last few years. Coming down to the games helped me get through that process. The heart operations, the chemo, all those things. I feel in some ways closer to the team because of some of those periods than probably previously."

Does the new CBA help you as a small market owner?

"It certainly did. That was obviously a protracted process that took a lot longer than some people thought it would and at some point people were thinking the season was definitely in doubt. It seems strange to be starting to play basketball in mid-December. They usually have preseason games in October so this is a couple months later than usual.

"But, anyway, to answer your point I became very involved in the process, you may have read that I joined a lot of discussions on the Collective Bargaining committee. At the invitation of the committee. Because I had made some presentations to all the owners at an owners meeting showing the different rates of profitability and especially stressing the fact that the smaller markets needed to do much better. They welcomed that and as a result I got a very close-up perspective on those negotiations which were hours and hours and hours of conference calls and players. And finally concluding, the result was the small markets are financially in a much better place.

"I can't tell you that everything couldn't have been more optimal but all of these labor negotiations are a compromise where you hope they would be able to come out and where they did come out. Sorry, do you have a follow-up?"

It was designed to prevent superstar movement but the Chris Paul trade just happened

"I think that star players that are at the end of their contracts have a ton of leverage as to where they are going to end up. They have to decide whether they want to extend their contracts after that. They have enormous leverage in terms of where they end up and what the teams are going to give up to get them. Basically I think what you're saying is [there are] situations where... unless the star player has bought into ending up [there] and probably gets a sense of what his eventual…

"There's a lot of discussion in terms of provisions of extending players on their rookie deals that end up being star players, there are some provisions in the CBA about that, that are the result of wanting to lock up, if you're not in one of these big markets, to have the chance to lock up players for longer periods of time. It was definitely something in the collective thinking to try to address some of those issues. But we have free agency and obviously it's very important to players to want to go where they can win and some of them like to be in these larger markets and in the spotlight in different ways.

"So, yeah, definitely there are parts of this CBA like the progressive luxury tax that are explicitly in place to try to discourage the teams with the bigger financial resources from really high luxury tax spending levels. So that's also a new element and a difference between the MMLE (mini mid-level exception) and the full mid level exception that you get if you're under the luxury tax. That's something we used to sign Jamal. All those things come into play. And the amnesty was put in to take care of situations like obviously we had with Brandon [Roy]. We had a huge contract for someone who is leaving basketball. Otherwise we would be in tough straits because of that. All of those factors come into play and you try to end up in a better place than where you started, which I think we did. But I think probably there will be more things addressed."

Rich Cho Firing

"I think whether it's Rich or Kevin, which was a really unusual situation, you end up going through these transitions. But I sit with the general manager down on the court and I talk through every game with them and you get a sense for his thinking and his evaluation of players. How he thinks about our team, how he thinks about our coaching. When I think about a general manager, there's a lot of things that come into play. There's what I call the 'Golden Gut' which is how good you are at evaluating talent and obviously we've added the importance of evaluating character and it becomes more important to evaluate medical conditions and all these things. There's that set of components.

"Then there's how well does he relate to the coaches and the players and gain their respect and engage with them, all of those things. There's the chemistry of working with me because I like to be very involved. Everyone knows I like to ask a lot of questions. I'm sure people have burned your ears off hearing how many times I like to ask questions. That's what I do. I like to ask a lot of questions, challenge assumptions and see if we can't come out in a better place. All those factors come into play for a general manager and you can have a good interview with somebody and be optimistic but then when it comes to getting into the season, sitting next to them, talking about the players, where you are going, potential trades, sometimes you realize it's not a good fit.

"That's basically what happened with Rich. He's a great person and I wish him well. But it wasn't a good fit. Once you realize [it's not] a good fit, it doesn't make sense to keep someone even though they are a good person and all of those things if you don't think the working relationship and what they are doing as your general manager is as good as it could be. So we had to make that change. I decided to make that change before the draft because of what had happened with the previous general manager where draft day was so -- how to put it? -- puzzling and unusual."

Evaluate Chad Buchanan's performance

"I think Chad has done a good job. We decided somewhere in the process that we really wanted to look at somebody with a lot of experience and fresh blood outside the organization so we haven't changed our mind about that. I have been impressed with what Chad has done but I still have that opinion.

"We're so focused on getting a great general manager at this point it's really puzzling to me when I read or hear that people think that I want to be the general manager. No! No! I just want to ask the questions and I want a great general manager. So we're going through that process. As of yet, we've been so diligent and thorough in our process that no one has made it to me. I have yet to interview a candidate that everybody -- that there was a consensus that everybody was excited about. I'm very much looking forward to talking to a few candidates and that may happen as the season evolves or more likely after the season is over as people change jobs or their contracts."

People think [adviser] Bert [Kolde] wants to be the GM

"No, Bert doesn't want to be the GM. Being a GM is a full time job. You're talking to teams, you're down here with the coaching staff. I mean it's a full-time job. Don't get me wrong, Bert has always been super enthusiastic about the Blazers but neither of us has ambitions to spend our time being a full-time GM. That's not… you want somebody who's got that depth of basketball experience, that's lived, eaten, breathed basketball for most of their lives. I would love to have already hired a great GM for this season and now we have to move forward."

Why was 2010 NBA Draft night puzzling?

"We set up our strategy for the draft. We went through if this person is there at this pick, we do this. We had a whole decision tree set up on the white board. If we do the Martell [Webster] trade, didn't do the Martell trade and different things. It happened and then I went out to get a breath of fresh air and Kevin tracked me down and basically said, 'Well, You've already decided to let me go.' And I said, 'Nooo, I haven't?' And he said, 'No, but you really should. Can I just meet with [Blazers president] Larry {Miller] the next day and we'll part ways?' And I was like, 'OK… really?' [Pritchard responded] 'Yes, yes I want to meet with Larry'… He kept coming back to it.

"If someone wants to be let go, after a few times, and he said, 'What were your concerns about me?' And I told him. I'm not going to get into them now. And finally I said, Fine, we'll do it.' And then of course it came out during the draft which was very distracting. Didn't affect actually what we did but it wasn't the most smooth draft day we've ever had here."

Could there have been a way to keep Pritchard?

"I had some real concerns and we would have had to have a deep discussion where he would have said he would have had to change some things. A real heart-to-heart but it was clear that he had decided to go a different direction."

Pritchard ended the relationship?

"He asked to be let go. Multiple times. I heard that you guys had that story."

Multiple times that day or did he ask previously too?

"In that meeting. He just kept coming back to it. 'Let's just part ways.'"

Next GM will be somebody outside Blazers with experience?

"Yes, and all the other things I laid out."

Won't be Buchanan?

"That's my current expectation, yes. Since I haven't interviewed anybody yet, that's my hope and expectation yet but things evolve over time."

Will you spend into luxury tax?

"I'm trying to do better. No, look. I mean the quandary that you get into in a small market is you've definitely started to see this happen. You have a choice between being competitive and maybe overspending or not trying to be competitive and trying to break even. That became very dramatic and I won't mention teams by name but you've started to see some teams that basically say, 'We're not going to be competitive because it costs too much money and we lose too much money.' Or, they'll decide to be competitive. Even the mid-market teams like Dallas, they won the NBA championship but they paid the luxury tax and lost a lot of money. In the process they win a championship. It was clear that not only did you have to stop the fact that most small-market teams in general and collectively [are] losing a lot of money but you had to try to level the playing field and there were many, many attempts in the CBA process to try to accomplish those things."

Evaluate Nate McMillan

"Given the amount of adversity that we've had, given the number of injuries and I think he's done a great job. Now imagine if we'd had Greg and Brandon and everybody else healthy for all of these last few years I think we would have.. the expectations would have been higher but given where we were I think he's done a great job. Obviously the team that beat us last year won the championship so is there room for improvement in any area? I think every year Nate tries to improve. Run more this year. Play faster. You look for continuous improvements as a goal."

Expectations for this team

"This is such a crazy year. With the shortened season, a compressed season and you've got new players on the team who you expect to contribute significantly. Some of the injuries have obviously, we're in a more definite place with the implications of those injuries, so it's going to be real interesting. People will talk about handicapping to say the usual suspects will be at the top of conference but a bunch of us right below that… are we just barely a playoff team? Are we potentially going to get out of the first round? Do more damage?

"That's what makes sports exciting. You have to see how it plays out. At this point I think everybody is optimistic but nobody knows for sure. Injuries can play, I should knock on wood, I don't know how many times here, knock on wood, injuries can play such a factor too. I just was, on the Thursday before last, I heard from Chad and he said, 'I have three pieces of news for you and none of them are good.' There's Brandon, Greg [Oden] and LaMarcus [Aldridge] at the same time. That's a just a shock to your system. I won't make too many predictions tonight but I'm optimistic."

Part of you want to cut ties with Greg Oden?

"Everybody roots for Greg. As you guys know, you know Greg, he's a great guy, he's tried to rehab. He's just had these repeated issues with his knees and we've tried to help him with all of those things. I hope he can play for us and make a contribution. It's very hard to know because these issues keep cropping up. We're trying to help him rehab and we're trying to be optimistic. We'll see how that turns out. But it's a challenge."

You've spent millions on the Blazers

"Hundreds of millions. Let's be clear, hundreds of millions."

OK, so what are you getting out of this?

"I think as an owner you really want to do the team right, the fans right, the community right. Build a winning organization. It does come back to the desire to win and be able to enjoy with the fans and the community success that you have. So I've invested a lot but the crazy luxury tax days and all those things are gone. Those are gone. With the carefully newly crafted luxury tax hopefully they're gone for everybody and everybody is on a much more level playing field. I'm not saying other leagues like the NFL are -- you see the benefits of having [a system where] any team can win on any day, there's a lot of benefits to that. My investments have been for the cause of winning."

You plan to spend between luxury tax and salary cap?

"Yeah. I mean, there's no enjoyment to losing money. I don't know anybody who thinks there is. The way that I think about it is… as you get older in life, you start thinking about 'I could be losing money doing this. I could be spending money on brain research or charity or things like that.' It's also a measure of the health of your organization. We are viewed as being… If I go back to David Stern, we get a lot of compliments about the fact that the fans here are so supportive and that we fill up our arena and the community embraces the team and all of those things. There's other municipalities where that's not the case. That's a great measure of the health of your franchise.

"At the other hand, you have to look at profit/loss too. It's one thing to say 'I'm going for it. It's a near championship year, I'll sign a couple of free agents and spend a lot more than usual.' But to do that on a regular basis doesn't make sense. We had a chance here with Brandon and L.A. and Greg and other players to really have a great, very strong core of players but our spending, and it is, high. We're still going to be paying on Brandon's contract for a few years.

"Fortunately, because of the amnesty provision, we're not penalized in terms of what we can do to bring other players in to replace, in some way, you're never going to replace a Brandon Roy, he's such a special player and such a great person, you're never going to replace that with any one player. Now, only because of the amnesty, we don't have that overhang for years and years in the future."

Can you give a long-term commitment to owning franchise

"There's so many things that go with it. Me, my health is a factor, other things are factors. I think at some point if I felt things were getting stale or if we were going to be a lottery team forever, we went through a rebuilding process. Some of those years are tough, when you're winning 20-some games or whatever, those are tough years. If I felt like we were going right back into that, that would be a challenge.

"I'm just trying to tell you how I think about it but I can't give you a definitive answer because I think every owner at some point thinks, 'OK, what's the future going to be?' You're starting to see some of the San Antonios and the Lakers who are getting towards the end of their championship windows and they're going to have to rebuild. Other people may decide… every year there's teams that have new ownership. We've got some new ownership in the league this last year."

You're not going to rebuild?

"I think when you sign a Jamal Crawford and L.A. is a great player and hopefully an All-Star this year and we've got other good players, obviously, around him. You've got the potential to be very, very competitive. There's obviously a tipping point where you say, 'Oh, I don't have one All-Star or near All-Star caliber player to build around.' And then you say it's time to reduce salary and go back, go young and go through the rebuilding process. Obviously with the moves we've made that's not in the cards for this year."

Brandon Roy

"We had so many, all of us had so many… he's such a special player and special person, we had so many amazing… in some of those games he'd hit a 3-pointer in the last .01 seconds, or whatever, to win the game. So many amazing moments and just the way he played. That deliberate but 'you're not going to be able to stop me' style. Just a fantastic basketball player. Not just a scorer but a passer, a rebounder, a heady player. They don't come along… Players like that don't come along very often. I would always chat with Brandon in the locker room.

"To get that news when we thought he was going to be in training camp the next day, that was a body blow. Along with the other two. As an owner you just have to work through those things and Brandon's moved on now. I had a good conversation with him and I wish him the best. But he gave us an amazing five seasons, the last season he was really dealing with the injuries.

"When you have injuries that are that significant it does take a toll on you as a player. You're an All-Star, you want to play like an All-Star and yet the injuries are holding you back. You're a different player than you were at your peak. I think that's tough for any player that's so young compared to somebody on the downside tail of their career."

Roy wants to come to empty Rose Garden and shoot. That OK by you?

"Oh sure. Oh gosh, sure. I would just imagine. I was there for some of those games. It's different if you're the person that was there. Have so many memories. It's funny you talk to players, they'll remember certain [plays]. We all probably remember those unbelievable 3-pointers."

Most memorable Roy moment?

"Who were we playing when he hit a 3-pointer and get fouled right in the last? … That quarter against Dallas. I think we're all going to remember that as the last… it was the full Brandon at his peak, unbelievable ability. But now we move on. Now we look at some of these young guys tonight and see what they can start to do and watch them grow. I'm someone who has always enjoyed watching young players progress. Brandon was someone that came in right away and you could tell he was going to be great."

You got criticism from Billy Hunter and Jeffrey Kessler

"Really?" (Laughs)

Did they portray your actions in that meeting accurately?

"It was an unusual thing. There I am trying to say, 'Look, we as small markets need to think collectively in certain ways and hold the line on certain things.' They ask me to attend one of these face-to-face meetings with players and I said, 'OK'. I go in there and one of the other owners says, 'We've got some real hard-liners in this group like Mr. Allen at the end of the table.' And I'm like, 'OK, here I am. I'm [just] taking notes.' So all the players looked at me like, 'Oh, you're the hard-liner?'

"But when we are meeting as a committee, people with the small markets, medium and big market teams and we had very good discussions about the different points and worked through things. I wouldn't characterize it as polarized as all that but you always have that tension in any CBA negotiations where the other side wants there to be… Me and Michael [Jordan] I guess took the lightning rod as being the hard-liners. In truth, I did believe we should hold the line on some things more than some other owner did but there were a lot of us that felt the same way."

NHL to Portland in the Rose Garden?

"We'd have to study it. Years ago, two sports are plenty for me. I've never been an NHL fan, I've said that before. We studied it years ago and it was a significant money loser but that was some years ago and they have a new CBA now so maybe it could be profitable here. I'd hate to think someone would bring in a team for a few years and lose a lot of money or something like that.

"The question you asked, is there enough support to support another major league franchise in this city? Those are higher ticket prices than the Winterhawks. I don't know the answer. It's been years since we studied it."

Thoughts on Portland Timbers

"The teams I follow are obviously the Seahawks and the Blazers. I think it's great… I always think it's great to have competition in the Northwest. I thought it was great to play the Sonics… I don't think I enjoyed many games more than if we could blow out the Sonics in Seattle. All my Microsoft buddies or whatever would be sitting there courtside and we're winning. Regional rivalries like that are great. I wish them well."

Seahawks on a good run

"Amazing. Amazing. I'll put in a good word for Pete Carroll and John Schneider. They've done a heck of a job. In the NFL you don't have guaranteed contracts and you've got such a deep draft that you can really rebuild something in a few years and it's just great to see that happen. Bring in some free agents. It's a different landscape than you have with the NBA where it's so driven by the top. Can be driven by the top players. Whether you have some of those on your roster or you draft right. The NFL you can miss on the draft but you can still recover. Those guys have done a fantastic job and everybody has really enjoyed the resurgence. Now we've got to win these next few games and we can get some help and hopefully we'll be in the playoffs again."

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Comment 100 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's about time the man spoke.

Although I can’t say I’m satisfied with his answers, especially re: firing Rich Cho. If he thinks Cho wasn’t a good fit, then at least take some blame for not doing your due diligence and hiring him in the first place.

Basket's that way, Chief!

by OneTrickPony on Dec 19, 2011 8:51 PM PST reply actions  

I can't hold that against him

You can’t know how well you’ll work with someone day-to-day until you’re actually working with him. There’s no interview that can really cover that. I’ve seen this live in the workplace a number of times. “Everything seemed so good in the interview!”

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 8:55 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Sounds like Paul Allen's just obnoxious and meddles too much.

I imagine conversations probably looked like this:

P.A. But what if Darius Miles isn’t done? Maybe we should look at bringing him back.
Cho Shut up. I’m the GM.
P.A. :(

It looks like the chemistry just wasn’t there.

by CaptainSexyJacob on Dec 19, 2011 9:10 PM PST up reply actions  

That's too big a leap for me to make

We really don’t know the inner workings over there.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to hear the GM’s side. But I don’t see any reason to assume that scenario is correct.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 9:13 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I like to ask a lot of questions, challenge assumptions and see if we can’t come out in a better place. All those factors come into play for a general manager and you can have a good interview with somebody and be optimistic but then when it comes to getting into the season, sitting next to them, talking about the players, where you are going, potential trades, sometimes you realize it’s not a good fit. That’s basically what happened with Rich

As we’ve speculated many times, it sounds like Rich was in favor of rebuilding and Paul didn’t want to go there. Time will tell who was right, but it’s hard to argue that some of the front office’s best moves (Wesley Matthews signing, Crawford last week, etc) came when they didn’t have a full-time GM in place

So it’s really only been “a problem” when the media brings it up.

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 19, 2011 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I know it's been speculated on a lot and almost become a BEdge fact,

but unless you start with that assumption then it’s hard to read any sort of evidence into PAs comments there.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 9:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I've also never seen confirmation that it's true

I mean, I can believe it’s true, it’s a reasonable possibility. But I’m not aware of any confirmation, just a bunch of rumors.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 9:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Any sources?

Or just BEdge rumours? I’m not saying that I don’t think it’s true, but I think it’s a big assumption to make, especially because I think Cho was a pro, and would be able to go with his bosses desires… Although, I guess it was his first GM gig in the league, so if he has flat out refused to follow PA’s guidelines for the future of the team I guess it could be a rookie mistake.

I would probably lean towards thinking that Cho’s firing was more about communication, which is something that was explicitly stated by PA in this interview and in the past too… just makes more sense to me.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 9:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure where the whole "Cho wanted to rebuild, PA didn't, so he got fired" rumors started

I’m sure they’re online somewhere. It ranked up there with “KP and PA splintered due to the Oden situation” rumors on stuff that I can’t tell if there is any accuracy involved.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 9:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I read something else into it

As in, Cho had a different philosophy of team building than Allen – not just process – but end result – how to structure a team; what pieces to bring in.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 19, 2011 9:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess what I am trying to say is that

even if they did have a strong difference of opinion about the team’s future, a good GM would be able to suppress his own desires and work with the direction given from above, don’t you think?

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 10:03 PM PST up reply actions  

sorry I didn't quite get what you said the first time-

but yeah, that could be a reason for sure, if he can’t manage the team as the owner requires. But the thing with Cho is that he got picked up by the Bobcats so quickly after we let him go, and Portland has that connection there- the Larry Miller/Nike connection with Michael Jordan, the GWallace trade mid-season, Jordan and PAllen being together in the group of hardline owners during labour negotiations… it seems like the Blazers may have even facilitated that hiring by the Bobcats a little, so in that case I’m thinking the problem really was just about communication and fit with the team.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

It's definitely possible.

I won’t rule out taking PA at face value on this one. If you’ve ever worked with someone you just can’t get on the same wavelength with, and for whom communication is forced and not natural, you’ll definitely know how hard that makes business. I imagine if you own the company, that leaves you with a point where you say “This isn’t the right direction”, unless that poor communication is leading to amazing results somehow.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 10:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm with you on this, lots of people want it to be something else, something more tangible but I completely understand this explanation.

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Dec 19, 2011 10:44 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree there was nothing in the interview that suggests Rich and Paul disagreed about rebuilding.

I take what Paul says at face value (which is exactly what Larry Miller said many months ago), and is what I have thought all along. Cho simply didn’t communicate with Paul. Paul is a basketball junkie and he wants a GM that is enthusiastic about talking with him about everything and anything basketball related. Cho just doesn’t seem like that type of guy. In an initial job interview it would be easy for Paul to get the opposite impression. Cho undoubtedly came into that interview ready to talk about every player in the league and talk about his basketball philosophy to impress Allen to get the job. But once he got the job I’ll bet Cho was very different and not interested in being Paul’s “basketball pal”. I’ve known a number of smart engineers that want to work by themselves and just won’t “waste their time” (which is what they perceive it to be) discussing their thought processes with anyone else. Cho has always felt like one of those guys to me by the way he addressed the media, fans, etc. I doubt he was any different with Paul Allen, and clearly Paul says that isn’t the type of GM he wants.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Dec 19, 2011 11:11 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

THIS

is exactly the most likely scenario. Allen never said anything other than it wasn’t a good fit. Cho gave a great interview, but like Allen said, after time passed, it just became obvious to him the two of them weren’t clicking. All about the relationship between him and his GM.

Go Blazers!

by EowynAmarie on Dec 20, 2011 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's safe to assume the discord was a matter of Paul Allen wanting to retool and Rich ...

Cho wanting to rebuild. In a situation such as that, no one is right and no one is wrong for having their philosophical preference on roster construction. While I personally believe rebuilding would be the best course of action over the long haul, it’s understandable how Allen — whose health is surely a factor — would prefer to tweak the roster instead.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 19, 2011 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

In this case, yes.

Even if it’s off by a bit, this is likely as close as we’ll get to hitting the mark.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 19, 2011 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

It's pretty simple, really.

Paul Allen wanted to retool, while Rich Cho wanted to rebuild.

Due to such philosophical differences, it was right to let Cho go and seek out a GM job more suited for him.

That worked out well for all parties involved, including Allen, Cho, Portland, and Charlotte. Rarely does a guy losing his job equal a win-win situation, but this was one of those cases.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 19, 2011 10:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

Thanks. I appreciate you transcribing it.

by jamon51 on Dec 19, 2011 9:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for the hard work Ben

No worries about not following the meaningless preseason game.

Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically

by OhOhOden on Dec 20, 2011 5:20 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd thank him

but he’s stated he doesn’t read his posts so I’ll put it in a bottle.

"The game was delayed for over 15 minutes with 5:07 left in the second quarter after France's Nicolas Batum, who plays for the Portland Trail Blazers, dunked and twisted the rim. Volunteers and officials scrambled to put a new rim on the basket and reattach a net."

http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/olybb/news/story?id=5509394

by ratbastird on Dec 28, 2011 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Probably a non-story though

He knew he wasn’t going to be able to stay, so just asked.

volatilelyle.com

by almost awesome on Dec 19, 2011 9:13 PM PST up reply actions  

That's kind of how I took it. It's possible he and PA perceived the situation very differently.

But this is the same period where KP was watching games from the tunnel, if memory serves.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 9:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I wonder if we'll ever hear from Pritchard on it?

My guess is that he will probably let it go since he is back working in the league (no need to make powerful enemies), but at some time we’ll hear from a 3rd person what KP told them… maybe after Allen sells the team…

I know it’s really a non-story but I guess I still wonder about it sometimes, because he was such a big part of that team- the Roy, Aldridge and Oden era, which is something that as Blazer fans we will look back on and think about what could have been- they could have been the best Blazer team ever (better than the 90s team and the championship team too)…

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 9:37 PM PST up reply actions  

At the same time-

it almost sounds like he’s ‘reaching out’ to KP in a way, saying that he thinks they could’ve worked it out, maybe he has some regrets about what went down too.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 9:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I imagine John Canzano is reaching out to KP as we speak

to see if he can pry out Kevin’s side of the story

and if John isn’t, A-Woj is

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 19, 2011 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

What makes you say that?

Just wondering? I forget if something happened with those guys.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know if I ever read this at the time-

I generally like A-Woj, he seems to hit more than he misses and it sounds like he has some sources for his piece, which does hit KP pretty hard. The last paragraph is very telling-

"If Kevin just kept his mouth shut, cut out all the arrogance and insecurity, I think he probably would’ve had his extension a long time ago."

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 10:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks AK1984...

after reading (re-reading?) this AWoj piece and the Allen interview I really feel like I’ve got closure on the whole KP thing. Everything seems to make sense, the world is in harmony, there is restoration in the balance between ying and yang… It all finally makes sense.

In some ways KP’s genius was also his undoing- one of the craftiest basketball guys in the business, it was that same craftiness behind the scenes which really put him on the wrong side of his owner and boss.

Sometimes criticesed for overvaluing his players, it seems that KP fell prey to overestimating his own value on the open market and assuming from the circumstances (banished to watching games from the players race) that he was potentially on his way out, pushed Paul Allen to fire him on the spot, with expectation, buoyed probably by his agent, that he would find another front office position shortly thereafter.

With this whole episode now etched in stone as a BEdge fact, I can finally move forward… and begin much more earnest contemplation of the whole Rich Cho firing… is it as Paul Allen claims, a communication issue? Was it philosophical? Any thoughts?

by simoninaustralia on Dec 20, 2011 7:40 AM PST up reply actions  

"is it as Paul Allen claims, a communication issue? Was it philosophical?"

No matter if it was caused by a disconnect in communication, philosophical differences, or both, Paul Allen firing Rich Cho worked out well for everybody.

Because of that, I wouldn’t fret too much about the minor details.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 20, 2011 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I remember his /Canzano/ interview with Brian T. Smith.

http://www.750thegame.com/pages/landing_canzano?The-Blazers-continue-their-search-for-a-=1&blockID=559076&feedID=9710&qv=1#bp
In the interview, Brian T. Smith talked about Kevin O’Connor in connection with rumors about the Blazers search for a GM.
He mentioned Pritchard and said that O’Connor never plays games.
The comparison he makes between the two, leaves an impression that the reputation of KP in the league is not very bright.

by prostofen on Dec 20, 2011 12:14 AM PST up reply actions  

sounds like, if what PA says about KP is true, he was a man who had become overwhelmed with the situation

and the constant questioning about his security with the team. I’ve seen that happen before for sure, and I don’t find the story implausible. Obviously though, the stress he would have felt was directly related to the way PA was treating him during that time frame, and the way PA was treating him probably had a lot to do with a bunch of stuff we’ll never know for sure but likely has to do with Tom Penn and Warren LeGarie. I’m guessing PA freezed KP out to try and get him to cut ties with those other two and wasn’t about to give him a vote of confidence while he was being represented by an agent engaged in a smear campaign against PA.

Impossible to say if the end result wasn’t inevitable though…

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Dec 19, 2011 10:25 PM PST up reply actions  

it does kind of explain why KP has been so gracious to the organization in all of his comments when asked about the team.

He always has good things to say about the Blazers, and Paul Allen and I have not heard him once even remotely lean towards painting the team in a bad light. It makes sense to speak this way when you are looking back at a situation with the clarity only afforded to those who admit their own roles in regrettable situations.

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Dec 19, 2011 10:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I can sure see why KP would want a finality.

It was more then obvious that something had gone astray; to go day after day wondering what and when it will all go down can be a no win battle within yourself. Sometimes it is better to take the bull by the horns and end it even if it puts you on the losing end. It is a way of letting yourself decide your destiny not someone else.

hg

by BBK on Dec 20, 2011 7:35 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Warren LaGarie was driving the Pritchard-Penn bus

and when the smoke cleared, the agent found he didn’t have a new landing zone for his two boy wonders

KP had his opportunity, he was well-liked in this city but his act was wearing thin around the rest of the league

and it’s interesting that Tom has carved out more of a post-Blazer career than Kevin has, so far

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 19, 2011 9:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel a little bit for both KP and Penn

they were both guys with very bright futures in the league, but it sounds like they went about business the wrong way (with the Tom Penn contract extension bluff, etc.) and they just made a very powerful enemy of sorts in PA. Hopefully both guys have learned from their mistakes but it sure seems to have cost them fairly dearly as far as having opportunities in the league.

by simoninaustralia on Dec 19, 2011 9:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Here was an interesting report by Adrian Woj. about the hiring of Kevin Pritchard in Indiana.
“For some, there was a belief that the hiring of former Portland Trail Blazers GM Kevin Pritchard as director of player personnel could be a precursor to Pritchard’s ascension, but that’s doubtful too. Simon was ambivalent over Pritchard’s hiring, sources say, but allowed Bird the leeway to bring him into the franchise for the next year.”

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-wojnarowski_pacers_reggie_miller_081811

Without Larry Bird having Pritchard’s back, it seems that KP might’ve still been out of a job. I think that Pritchard and Tom Penn burned a few bridges due to Penn’s double-dealing with Minnesota — which he used to con Paul Allen into a promotion and raise — while having their agent run his mouth to the press fanned the flames.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 19, 2011 10:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't know if I like all he has to say

But I’m glad he made an effort. I wasn’t nearly as upset about pritchard leaving as everyone else, he always reminded me of a smooth car salesman, but now what allen had to say makes me even more interested. There needs to be a pirates of silicone valley type of movie done on the roy-pritchard years i think.

by Rage_quit on Dec 19, 2011 9:18 PM PST reply actions  

i could never remember if silicon was spelled with an e

Then someone told me that if I think about silly cones I won’t forget

by eloi on Dec 19, 2011 10:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I saw that one ...it was on Cinemax

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Dec 19, 2011 10:27 PM PST up reply actions  

good movie for a bad movie

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Dec 19, 2011 10:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you missed a joke in there

But Anthony Micheal Hall as Bill Gates was pretty good

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Dec 19, 2011 10:33 PM PST up reply actions  

silicone, yep got it...

good one

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Dec 19, 2011 10:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Paul Allen is a very smart man

With a ton of experience and instinct when it comes to placing the right cogs in the framework of his business ventures. KP and Rich Cho weren’t geniuses, neither of them did anything which warrants lavish praise or immunity. KP had one good draft, EVER, and rode its coat tails for many seasons, Rich Cho, while he may have had a fair grasp of basketball economics and salary cap whatever, the guy was for all intents and purposes socially inept. Now I know, playing GM in the NBA isn’t exactly politiking for a presidential election but the social element clearly wasn’t there, and that’s half the game. So obviously I’m not happy with having an interim GM at this point, but I’d rather know that work is being put into evaluating the correct people and ultimately finding a valuable asset for the front office, rather than knowing that we have a wooden stool running our team, like 75 percent of the league does at present.

And as for PA’s general value as owner, I think when we step back and really think about it, we will find that there are only a handful of owner’s who are more equipped in terms of resources and vested interest than our own Paul Allen.

Love what I saw tonight on the floor against the Utah Jamz…glad to have this team back, and all you good people as well. Let’s enjoy the 2011 run and gun Trailblazers!

by fktesla on Dec 19, 2011 9:28 PM PST reply actions  

rec

The Blazers are back !

by Berkeley on Dec 20, 2011 12:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I'll rec this as well

and also admit I’ve been one to… bash Allen a little for what I felt were bad decisions. Some of it is just emotional and in the heat of “noooooo”. Reality is, that since Roy/Aldridge draft, I feel the team has gone a better direction. Not because of their drafting but because they actively were looking to shed bad apples (actually it may have been the year before when it started) Real success is built on a foundation. I’m hoping his investment pans out while Allen is still the owner.

"The game was delayed for over 15 minutes with 5:07 left in the second quarter after France's Nicolas Batum, who plays for the Portland Trail Blazers, dunked and twisted the rim. Volunteers and officials scrambled to put a new rim on the basket and reattach a net."

http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/olybb/news/story?id=5509394

by ratbastird on Dec 28, 2011 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I just was, on the Thursday before last, I heard from Chad and he said, ‘I have three pieces of news for you and none of them are good.’ There’s Brandon, Greg and LaMarcus at the same time.

That had to be a tough phone call.

by Timmay! on Dec 19, 2011 9:37 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, that was a brutal day

for me. And I haven’t spent hundreds of millions of dollars on this team, just to be clear.

"Coach said to always be careful around Greg, because Greg costs a lot and even the slightest amount of basketball can damage him." -- The Onion

by RedUniInLA on Dec 20, 2011 11:39 AM PST up reply actions  

sounds like he wants to keep dealing with oden

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 19, 2011 9:58 PM PST up reply actions  

sounds like

you don’t want PA to be dealing with Oden, anymore

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 19, 2011 10:21 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Based on what?

Allen seems very loyal to his guys. I bet that’s part of why he’d rather retool than rebuild.

"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave

by DC Blazer on Dec 19, 2011 10:55 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, not to mention, it's probably the smart move.

Team not looking too horriffic so far.

The Blazers are back !

by Berkeley on Dec 20, 2011 12:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Very insightful.

I’m ready to move on now. The regular season will be great. The team is fairly deep barring any injuries.

by CoryBauer on Dec 19, 2011 10:03 PM PST reply actions  

Canzano said he talked with Nate for 15-20 minutes

and came away with the feeling that Nate is more optimistic about this group of players than he has been for several years

I think the decision to play uptempo will stick this time, we’ll see

Nolan Smith sure got the message tonight re:playing loose with the ball

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 19, 2011 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I had to laugh at that

McMillan just can’t help himself. A rookie starts to get a little out of synch and BAM!, his depth chart challenger takes the court :)

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Dec 19, 2011 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

"I think the decision to play uptempo will stick this time, we’ll see"

I’m standing firm that this won’t stick. By season’s end, Portland will be in the bottom-five in pace factor.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 19, 2011 10:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Portland will be in the bottom-five in pace factor.

Which they very well could be, and yet the Blazers could still appear to most observers as pushing the ball with more more frequency compared to how they have done in the past 5 years.

The ball movement on offense is back as well, it went on hiatus late last year after Roy returned to the rotation

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 20, 2011 12:37 AM PST up reply actions  

*much more

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 20, 2011 12:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Ooh... do I see a change in the BEdge resident cynic?

You must have been at least a little impressed by the tempo of the game today, because I think you had actually predicted worse than bottom-five. Maybe some truth in all of that rhetoric?

by simoninaustralia on Dec 20, 2011 7:47 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm being a cynic entirely, since I'd actually prefer to keep the pace slow.

Anyway, when it comes to my prediction on pace, I’ll specify it here. If Nate McMillan coaches the entire season, Portland will finish with a pace factor that’s in the bottom-five (i.e., 26th-30th) and is less than 90 possessions per 48 minutes. In an actual bet, I’d feel safe in putting $100 down on that. Not that I’m doing so, but just saying I’d be very, very comfortable with it.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Dec 20, 2011 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

These kind of formulations are fantastic

Paul Allen ith respect to superstar players:

“Basically I think what you’re saying is situations where the player doesn’t take place unless the star player has bought into ending up and probably gets a sense of what his eventual…”

These are the words of a man that hates free agency and the power it drains from ownership. pA is helpless and it grates. Too bad, deal with it Mr. Small Market.

by oregonslee on Dec 19, 2011 11:46 PM PST reply actions  

if you look at it from the owner's perspective

they make sizable investments on several young men every season, and once in awhile one of these kids pans out and becomes a franchise changer. Then oftentimes that player looks for greener pastures, and ultimately rejects a fair-market extension from his mother team because of intangibles like location and endorsement opportunities

it would grate on me, too

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 20, 2011 12:42 AM PST up reply actions  

slight correction
ultimately rejects a better than fair-market extension from his mother team

Since bird rights allow for that advantage

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Dec 20, 2011 7:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Let's move The Blazers to LA or NY !!!

Since that is how you “deal with” the small market blues

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Dec 20, 2011 7:40 AM PST up reply actions  

You know it's not clear to me what is a small market

Is Dallas, Seattle, DC or even Philadelphia a small market? According to Dave it’s characterized by big television contracts but except for the obvious Laker, Chicago, Knicks media markets does that include a middling Miami or even a large Houston market?

I’m not yet convinced on the small market argument. In fact, it seems a little like a cop out argument or the argument du jour. No, it always seems to come back around to revenue sharing and the absolute unwillingness of NBA owners to provide stability through revenue sharing. You might also argue that revenue sharing introduces parity as in the NFL. Well, the season started and we can look forward to some entertainment and we can watch the owners also, sitting tin the the front row without any clothes.

by oregonslee on Dec 20, 2011 11:35 AM PST up reply actions  

first: Can't we get a better picture of Allen ??

ok, he didn’t let you shoot during the interview. Does that mean you have to stick with that dumpy shot ? Can’t you get some more shots of him in his seat during a game ? Sheez.

Nice interview, seemed pretty straight, reasonable and relaxes. I continue to be very happy with PA as the Blazers owner, and have positive regard for him on a personal level.

I like him talking about ‘running’.. heh, heh. I like to think that can’t hurt Nate’s committment in that direction.

The Blazers are back !

by Berkeley on Dec 20, 2011 12:06 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Allen would prefer the team be more uptempo

we only have to look at how the team has collected quick PGs over the years to realize this

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 20, 2011 12:44 AM PST up reply actions  

I knew someone who was getting older, had gone through cancer, wasn't a beauty

and had one particularly goodfrom ten years before. Newspaper photographers sometimes revel in getting an unflattering photo of someone who prefers to live privately. An unflattering picture — with your mouth open and your eyes shut, for instance — can be pretty painful if you run into it again and again.

Give Paul Allen a break if he doesn’t like to be photographed all the time.

ignacio

by ignacio on Dec 20, 2011 6:57 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm with you on the picture.

It’s a low blow to always use one that makes PA look stupid

by vullkem116 on Dec 20, 2011 7:05 AM PST up reply actions  

This is the most important quote:
We’re so focused on getting a great general manager at this point it’s really puzzling to me when I read or hear that people think that I want to be the general manager. No! No! I just want to ask the questions and I want a great general manager who will adhere to our new dress code, which is pictured in the preseason guide I just handed out.


Image of new Blazer GM “hardware” as demonstrated by long time friend, Bill Gates

/s

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 20, 2011 9:12 AM PST reply actions  

Ben!

Thanks for the transcript, as I have patience for listening to Paul Allen talk :) From experience, I know how much fun it is to transcribe, so I really do appreciate it.

Think it’s a shame so much of the genuinely good discussion on BE evolves into silly inside jokes and insults though

Go Blazers!

by EowynAmarie on Dec 20, 2011 9:35 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Great interview

Thank you.

I think Paul Allen did a great job and his response was definitely appreciated. Clearly things get blown out of proportion by rabid fans (yes I was one of them with KP), and a media that’s instant and echo chambered.

I felt he did a great job explaining his view and stance and, from the text, it didn’t feel like he hedged. It felt true. I’m curious what the issues were, but obviously some of them were the health of the team for KP. Cho, I’m really curious on this one. I thought he was a good fit, from the outside, but we’re all on the outside and we really just don’t know the whole story.

Thanks for spending Millions Allen. Hundreds of millions even. Here’s hoping this team can do some great things because I’d love for the blazers to win a ring and I’d love for you to be able to share in that.

"The game was delayed for over 15 minutes with 5:07 left in the second quarter after France's Nicolas Batum, who plays for the Portland Trail Blazers, dunked and twisted the rim. Volunteers and officials scrambled to put a new rim on the basket and reattach a net."

http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/olybb/news/story?id=5509394

by ratbastird on Dec 28, 2011 4:45 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm