Game 47 Preview: Celtics vs. Trail Blazers
Game Time: 7:30 p.m. TV: TNT
In TNT's Buyer's Remorse game of the night (yes, they made the schedule pre-injuries) the 25-21 Portland Trail Blazers face the 34-10 Boston Celtics in Portland's Rose Garden. The Blazers will be hard-pressed to make themselves a thorn in Boston's side. The Celts are on a 9-3 run this month and there's plenty of bad news to go around.
The Celtics lead the league in shooting percentage at 50.3% per game. They post an impressive 5th-overall league ranking in points in the paint combined with a 4th-overall ranking in three-point percentage. They're legit inside and out, as you'd expect any team fielding Kevin Garnett, Rajon Rondo, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen to be. They're a middling fast-break team, largely because they don't need to hurry when they run such a high-percentage offense. They're poor offensive rebounders, but again the high shooting percentage offsets this. They are a skilled, professional, and polished offensive unit, less intimidating than inexorable.
Though they got off to a shaky start this season, the Celtics' defensive form has returned as the year has progressed. They're second only to Chicago in defensive efficiency. They're second in fast break points allowed and best in the league in points in the paint allowed. They're 5th in opponent shooting percentage, 8th in opponent three-point percentage, 10th in defensive rebounding percentage. If they're not the league's best overall defense they're close.
If there's anywhere the Celtics can be had it's the foul line. They don't draw foul shots and they give up more than average. But it's hard to close the gaps between your team and theirs on either end of the court with single-point shots.
A couple of developments give the Blazers hope, though.
1. Portland has been decimated by injuries but the Celtics have suffered their share too. Shaquille O'Neal and Jermaine O'Neal are out. Kendrick Perkins has one game under his belt this season, their last outing. Delonte West is out with a wrist injury. Marquis Daniels sat out the last game for personal reasons. Forward Glen Davis and guard Nate Robinson are the only two reliable players they field. Granted, either would be more than welcome on Portland's roster right now but still, this is not the bulldozing prospect it would have been were Boston completely healthy.
2. The Celtics lose odd games sometimes. Their last five losses have come against Detroit, New Orleans, Houston, Chicago, and Washington. Almost without exception those were low-scoring affairs, which may give the Blazers a clue how to approach this game: slow, ugly, and keeping the margin between the teams low.
Kevin Garnett has long been a bully to the Blazers. One of the strong keys to Portland's game tonight will be how the new LaMarcus Aldridge fares against him. Pull KG's teeth, make his bark empty, and the Blazers are a large step ahead. If Aldridge folds, though, his teammates won't be able to bail water fast enough to save the ship.
If Boston comes in disinterested, the Blazers could certainly make this a tough outing. Boston's margin of victory was only 4 in the game played on December 1st. If the Blazers can keep the gap that small again, making the game turn on the last couple of plays, they'd be happy.
CelticsBlog has your Boston angle covered.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They’re second only to Chicago in defensive efficiency.
Thibodeau’s former and current teams…coincidence?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
In Boston, Lawrence Frank has done just a wonderful job replacing Tom T. A wonderful, wonderful job.
Unlike Nate McMillan, Doc Rivers will hire smart, hard-nosed assistant coaches and defer responsibilities to them.
Rivers was humble enough a few years ago to understand that he’s got a poor defensive acumen, so he’s compensated for his lack of smarts on that side of the ball by hiring guys who can compensate for him.
McMillan, however, is way too stubborn — as well as quite possibly too inept — to do as such, which is why Portland has been mired in mediocrity on the defensive end due to schematic reasons.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
He rely's on team defense and the team is contineusly changing
That is not intirely Nate’s fault.
hg
Heh
hg, I tried to catch up with you on a thread after you said hi on another. I don’t think we touched base since last summer. A lot has changed since then huh! Funny you commenting on McMillan here as I had said something about him on that previous post reply to you. I’ve gone from anti-Mcm to neutral simply because he seemed to have adapted to this new team look. However, I just watched a video of him pre-Boston game and he sounded like a broken record of gotta play scrappy talk. Oh well, I’m fairly certain he is gone at the end of the season anyway.
I do defend all the Blazers, don't I.
I just don’t like blaming him for things that is not his fault. Whether he is here or not is not my call. I just go with what we have and who we have.
I have thought of us trading coaches with Miami.
hg
Ur true blue
Even when the administrations change ur still a patriot! He He
We’ve seen the complaints before but usually it’s McMs lack of offensive schemes. I see McM as more of a nuts and bolts guy sort of like Vince Lombardi (not that I’d compare) When a scout from Baltimore snuck into a Green Bay practice and tried to get a grip on their game plan he told them all that they practiced was block and tackle block and tackle. Game plan? For McMillan it’s scrappy play! It is almost unfair IMO to compare McM with Doc Rivers. What I’ve seen from them over the last few years is right up there with Phil Jackson/Tex Winters as far as offensive prowess breaking down defenses and as AK1984 said he found good defensive minds. I remember back in the day when people in Portland were talking about their own team the Blazers being a dumb team and Adlebrain being an idiot coach. Well at least in comparison the the Lakers and Bulls at the time. Now I hear young guys saying they’d love to have Adleman and what a great coach he is. I don’t know much about Spoelstra but I’d be willing to give it a try.
Nate doesn't hire smart, hard-nosed assistant coaches and defer responsibilities to them?
Monty Williams would disagree.
Wiggada Wiggada Zers!
Nate hires the coaches ?
All these years I thought it was Mr Allen and the Vulcans. Nate can tell them to get stops until his face turns blue, he can’t defend for the team.
I hope Mr Allen has a nice view of how to build a championship watching the Celtics tonight. When you have that many bigs, injuries aren’t devastating. Big men get injured.
Having the same pg for more than a season, who can see over defenders helps too :)
I will be yelling for my Blazers and cursing the Chuckster as usual.
This team never backs down when their backs are to the wall. I’m not expecting a blood bath.
Let’s Go Blazers !!!!
AJ will learn before Patty Cakes will grow.....
I don’t know. New Orleans under Monty is playing much better D than the Blazers ever have under Nate. I wonder if Nate really deferred as much defensive responsibility to Monty as he should have. Don’t know the answer.
long live the jd.
To be fair Nate hasn't really had a complete or consistent roster
but it does seem like our starting line-up spends most of every game in bad-defense or no-defense mode. Unfortunately, we’ll never get anywhere like that.
The team did seem to be getting closer before Camby went down though.
Defensive responsibility? Yeah, not sure about that. But the point I was trying to make is that Monty would probably disagree with the statement in general. For example:
Williams says he learned plenty from his time with McMillan."Nate allowed me to coach," Williams says. "He trusted his assistants. I’m going to try my best to do that with my assistants.
Wiggada Wiggada Zers!
I assume that Nate McMillan allowed Monty Williams to be a player development coach.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
I'll be at this game!
If you see a man in the crowd wearing a black LMA jersey next to a woman wearing a pink Kevin Garnett jersey, that’s me and my wife!
This is the first game I’ve been to in 3 years, and the Blazers have never lost a game I’ve attended, although I’ve only been to 6 games in my lifetime, and those games were scattered across different eras. 1 in the Drexler era, 3 in the Pippen era and 2 in the Roy era.
Porter, Drexler, Kersey, Williams, Duckworth. The greatest starting 5 ever.
we're supposed to lose this one, which can be a good sign we will win.
I wonder if wesley is going to try the shooting goggles.
If Oden does not give up on the Blazers, we should not give up on him.
I feel pretty confident on the last question of the Jersey Contest...
I mean, I can only think of one player likely to score 16 points below than their season average.
Bring it Blazers!
make it a good one.
#7
by collectiveshane on Jan 26, 2011 11:45 PM PST reply actions
Celtics blow us out.
I sure hope it’s otherwise. But that team plays defense.
"The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason." - G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy, 1909
Blazersedge.com || New to Blazersedge?
Actions -> Rec and Flag. Blazersedge works right when you use these two things.
Agree
I just don’t see how we compete in this game. Garnett will get inside LMA’s head and eat him alive.
I doubt that.
I think LMA is pretty much past head games at the level he is. Garnett is not big or mobile enough to really have much effect on LMA. It’s Boston’s other bigs that I am more worried about.
\oo///
<
\__/
by NCBlazerfan on Jan 27, 2011 10:01 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah I agree
Perkins would probably give LMA more trouble than KG. The O’Neils apparently aren’t playing.
KG will just do a lot of talking.
Yeah that lol
Maybe LMA will slap him on the back of the head again
i wonder
how much their team outweighs us by? to the stat cave!
by extraneous solutions on Jan 27, 2011 12:43 AM PST reply actions
We have nothing to lose
We are not supposed to win on TNT with Charles Barkley know it all analysis. Just ask Chuck LMAO. With nothing on the line and the fact that we just proved that any team can beat any other team at a given time, we just relax, have fun and go for the knock down drag out physical game. Of course the Celtics hit below the belt. So when the refs are not looking hit them in the stomach and knock the wind out of them, that will take some of that cockiness out of them. We win by a slim margin, they carry Pierce, the self proclaimed best three off on a stretcher so he doesn’t have to confess that he is unable to keep up with Batum. KG will get down on his knees to bark and lose his false teeth while trying to bite LMA, and LMA knocks out his contact when he slaps him along the side of the head in retaliation. Joel will take Greg’s place and throw Ray Allen in the second row of the bleachers for trying to dunk on him. Wesley will guard Rajon Rondo and out score him.
SOUNDS GOOD
hg
This could be a blood bath.....
Hopefully not as much a blood bath as that Laker-Utah game the other day….. that would be bad.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
does anyone think I'm evil for secretly enjoying the downward spiral of the Utah Jazz??
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
If you are Mr. Evil for thinking those thoughts then you have a partner.
It is more of an enjoyment seeing them lose six in a row against basically the same teams that we did. Now, I don’t know if misery enjoy’s company or It doesn’t make us look quite so bad when somebody else follows our path.
hg
Wow, this is the most pathetic set of deflationary comments I've ever seen!
How about some optimism!? Some hope?
I am going to this game and I am going to YELL LOUD and we are going to WIN! So just can it, all of you.
I
"nattering nabobs of negativism"
written by William Safire for Spiro Agnew. Not that I want to spin you in a negative light by the reference and sources. LOL
Here's some optimism and hope for you, from a Celtics blog
The Celtics have tended to lose focus when they play against teams who have a losing record or who have a star out. With the injuries on the Blazers, the Celtics may tend to take them lightly but that would be a big mistake because the Blazers are still a very dangerous young team.
Wiggada Wiggada Zers!
The Blazers ALWAYS step up in 'big' games but...
that Sac loss was no fluke: this team is practically out of gas and definitely out of answers in the paint. Without Camby the offense is either a running train or a running sore—too often the latter. What Sac can do Boston can do better, and Garnet will have his team ready to hush the RG.
An improbable and rare early Blazer run is the only possible way they remain relevant in tonight’s matchup. Sad but true. Comebacks against The Clippers and Wolves is one thing—comebacks against the probable NBA champs quite another.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 27, 2011 9:51 AM PST reply actions
But the Blazers always find a way to succeed with the following:
- on national TV
- short-handed
- at home
- against good competition
Combine all 4, it’s a Blazer win.
#7
by collectiveshane on Jan 27, 2011 11:02 AM PST up reply actions
Obviously you didn't see the Boston game last year at the RG when the Blazers were...
- on national TV
- short-handed
- at home
- against good competition
Combine all 4, and it was a Boston Blowout. Plus Boston was on the tail end of a back to back!
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Would have to agree completely
That 5 game winning streak was a result of a ton of extra effort and a lot of things going really right…including weak competition.
I would love to be surprised tonight
LMA is not afraid of KG. They will probably get him in foul trouble though. The Celtics are bullys and usually get the calls and no-calls in their favor. What can you say about Rondo? I heard the guy trains on roller skates and he spins and whirls on the court. He makes everybody better. I loved it when BRoy was trash talking Pierce in the good ol’ days.
To win we will need few turnovers, high percentage of 3’s (Rudy, Patty, Nic), Nic and Wesley need to drive, drive, drive, and maybe Andre could put up another 52 with a monster slam, like against Dallas. wouldn’t that be fun! This would be a good chance for LMA to show the world he’s ready for the All-Star game, or at least knock KG on his a$$.
Hiya.
Well, Portland is a nice place. Our drivers are clueless, instead of crazy like in Boston. Our Boston Cream donuts are actually called “Portland Cream” donuts. The city is situated in a soggy, wetland area where two major rivers join. The depth of the river made it an ideal “port” location. Walla! Portland (not “New Boston”, thanks to the lucky flip of a coin).
We also have lots of beer.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 27, 2011 2:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
ha.ha.
I was looking for thoughts on the Blazers… like, has Oden ever played a game? What’s the deal there?
by Marisa Ingemi on Jan 27, 2011 2:41 PM PST up reply actions
You mean like XBox360?
I think he’s a gamer
by poorwebguy on Jan 27, 2011 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Blazers are a strange case.
Its amazing the blazers are basically going to make the playoffs in the west, while missing their 2 best players, and now camby goes down with an injury and you guys are still a good team.
Basically LaMarcus Aldridge, Wes Matthews, and Andre Miller can carry teams above .500 and into the playoffs.
No doubt in my mind that if Oden, Roy, and Camby were healthy they would be a legit title contender and probably 1st or 2nd seed in the west.
Agreed
Unfortunately, I think we’ve missed the boat as far as contending is concerned. Your guys are playing some really good basketball though. Good luck this year. Following some of your games I’m really seeing another Lakers/Celtics re-match for the finals this season.
Lots of good records around but I can’t see many other teams besides the Lakers and Celtics competing at a high enough level to actually win it all. Celtics may very well end up with home court advantage too.

by 


































