Game 46 Recap: Blazers 81, Kings 96
In a Nutshell
The Blazers play with fire one too many times and get burned out of a fourth-quarter comeback by good Kings defense down the stretch. Samuel Delambert assures the win for Sacramento. All the Bactine in the world won't take away the sting of losing to the Kings at home.
Game Flow
The Trail Blazers announced their intentions in the first few seconds of this game when they failed to block out on Sacramento's first trip to the free throw line and gave up an offensive rebound. From that point on some stellar early play from Nicolas Batum and the re-discovery of Wesley Matthews' jumper proved decoration on an already-fallen cake. The Blazers let Sacramento's guards drive and shoot so freely that the Kings' corps of big men became an afterthought. Tyreke Evans and Beno Udrih are Options #1 and #2 for the Kings and neither were defended. On the other end the Blazers moved lackadaisically and were plagued with uncharacteristic turnovers. The Kings led 25-20 after one.
The problems only got worse as the reserves checked in. The defense got no better and the offense stalled completely. The scoring for the Blazers in the first 5:59 of the second period consisted of two Dante Cunningham jumpers. Seasoned viewers will know that this is pretty close to the last option in Portland's sets, a.k.a. "The Bail Out". With the Blazers down by 13 halfway through the quarter the returned starters put in one of their only sustained efforts of the game. Wesley Matthews, Andre Miller, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Nicolas Batum all scored at the cup as Portland mounted a 17-8 run during which their only points scored beyond 7 feet came via the foul line. The Kings looked bad defensively and Portland's outlook seemed rosy. The Blazers were within 2, 45-43, at the half.
The third quarter stayed tight throughout but the bells were already ringing for the Blazers' chances to pull this game out of its nosedive. The Blazers scored, but 16 of their 22 points in the period came from 19 feet and beyond, a far cry from the end of the second where they destroyed the Kings inside. Sacramento also hit their threes and scored more in the lane than the Blazers did. Sacramento's bigs came alive in the quarter, picking up where the guards had left off. Jason Thompson, Carl Landry, and Omri Casspi punished a Portland team with half its eyes on Evans and Udrih. Only Matthews' sterling performance from outside kept the Blazers close. The Kings led by 5, 70-65, heading into the final period.
Andre Miller and Nicolas Batum kept the Blazers in the game through the first part of the fourth. Miller found himself open for mid-range jumpers. Batum hit a critical three and a couple free throws. The score was 83-79 Sacramento with 4 minutes remaining. But the Blazers' planned push for glory got swatted to heck by Samuel Delambert who came up with some nifty overall defense on LaMarcus Aldridge and a couple brutal blocks of Portland drives in the lane. Forced to the perimeter, the Blazers shot deep and against the clock or not at all because of turnovers. Meanwhile the Kings danced with the girl that brung them, feeding Evans and Udrih and letting the forwards clean up on the boards. With little margin for error the Blazers flooded the floor with them down the stretch. Sacramento skates with a 15-point victory, 96-81.
Notable Developments
The Blazers again tried Rudy Fernandez at point in the first quarter. The experiment lasted only a couple minutes as the offense never got going and Rudy got stripped once. Fernandez is great passing on the move but he's not your straight-away, ball-holding dribbler.
Portland failed so miserably at controlling space in this game--defensively and in rebounding--that it looked ridiculous. The Kings went wherever they wanted, whenever they wanted. The offense was hit and miss but LaMarcus Aldridge in particular had problems dominating even the floor under his feet.
Also when Portland's bench struggles, it really struggles.
Individual Notes
Speaking of LaMarcus Aldridge, on a night when he was named the Western Conference Player of the Week he shot 4-14 for 9 points. He had 7 rebounds and 5 assists but also 4 turnovers. As just mentioned, he was largely ineffective with only a couple of pretty post moves to his credit. The Kings clearly came in looking to cut the head off of the beast and they succeeded. To top it off, Aldridge had hip x-rays following the game.
While that pesky head was getting club many tails took advantage of their free rein. Nicolas Batum packed a fantastic game into 15 minutes of playing time, scoring 16 on 6-12 shooting grabbing 9 rebounds, and making 2 of 4 threes. Unfortunately his minutes played stat reads 41. Those other 26 minutes weren't as productive.
Wesley Matthews made 9-20 shots, 2-3 threes, and scored a team-high 21 in 41 minutes himself. He had trouble containing his counterparts and had 3 assists and 3 turnovers to his credit. He began Portland's offensive aggression...full credit there.
Andre Miller ended Portland's offensive aggression, being the last Blazer to make a run of good plays in the fourth before the fall-apart. Miller had 18 points on 8-15 shooting, 5 offensive rebounds, and 5 assists. Like his compatriots, he committed an unusual number of turnovers with 4 to his name. He also had 3 steals in a game where such were rare for the Blazers.
Joel Przybilla made a game run at 23 minutes but he's clearly not meant to be out there for long stretches. He had 6 rebounds.
Dante Cunningham was one of the few Blazers showing a full-tilt game tonight. He had 8 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 blocks in 23 minutes. He wasn't all that effective and neither was the team when he played, but at least he was doing something.
Rudy Fernandez had an amazingly bad line of 1-10 shooting, 0-7 from distance, 2 points, 4 rebounds, a block, and 3 turnovers in 25 minutes. His game was just about that bad too.
Patrick Mills was a non-factor with 5 points in 11 minutes.
Stats of the Night
- Kings 50% shooting, Blazers 39.5%. You need a whale of a game to overcome that. More wails than whales in the Garden tonight.
- Kings 16 offensive rebounds.
- Blazers only 11 foul shot attempts.
- Blazers 17 turnovers.
- Portland's Bench: 5-25 from the field, 1-8 from distance, 0 free throws attempted, 12 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal, 5 blocks (thanks, Dante), 3 turnovers, 4 fouls, and 15 combined points in 60 total minutes spread among 4 players. It's hard for the starters to score 85 points to make up for all that.
- Needs to be said again: Blazers 81 points total. Against...Sacramento...
Odd Notes and Links
The Blazer Broadcasting crew interviewed Brandon Roy as he was sitting on the bench during the game. Roy sounded upbeat...certainly more so than the last time we heard from him. He doesn't sound close to playing but said he'd likely be back before the season finished. It was at least good to hear him in good spirits and looking forward to something positive. As it turns out that was the only positive thing tonight.
Jersey Contest Scoreboard (As it turned out the high score for this game was 58 out of a possible 100. Not often the scores skew that low. Bad night for Jersey Contest players as well.)
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Michael Jordan sat courtside during the first half
I think the glare on his dome blinded the Blazers, leaving them powerless to destroy the lowly Kings.
by itsnotcomcastic on Jan 24, 2011 11:18 PM PST reply actions
but the spirit of June, 1992 tore out the Blazer hearts, once again
“shrug”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Matthews had trouble containing his counterpart?
Seriously Dave, i wonder if you are objective when it concerns Matthews. He is really struggling defensively, and it did not start today. Many times he has tough match up against taller and powerful opponents, that is nothing new at this stage.
Tonight he had a nice run offensively, mostly in the 2nd and third quarter. In the 4th on the other end, he did not shine, nor did not other guards. Really poor execution and stereotyped play, they forced way too many times, denying open shoots and not finding the opean team mate (since the kings were crowding the paint) in the perimeter.
Batum did a good job today, and for the full game, imo. He had the attitude, the agressiveness, but he did not always get the ball, especially in the 4th.He even threw away the last 3 out of frustration i bet. I take the same bet that when he will have an off night he will receive the ball…
Defensively he and cunningham were like the only blazers worth something tonight. Even if he struggled at the post (not like anyone did not today, especially our bigs) on switches or during the short small ball run.
I just don’t get why nate did not put batum on evans in the 4th. At least evans would not have had such an easy time to run his team late in the game. And i would not have run that 3 guards line up at all, opting for more forwards at least to have a shot for second chances.
not a lot of options
coming from behind, Nate needed his 5 scorers on the floor. Rudy just wasn’t on his game, for whatever reason
Nic was “doing a Portland” in the corner again while Fernandez handled the ball willy-nilly. Some will blame this on Batum’s lack of assertiveness. I continue to point the finger at Nate’s system, which has consistently used the wings to spread the floor for the past 5 years
Oh well, it looks like 3 more months of this and we’ll be off for awhile, then it will be time for something new after the lockout
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
and just remember that during the lockout
we’ll all be wishing we could tune in and watch a 15 point loss to the Kings at home
just you wait…the withdrawal symptoms will begin in earnest, next November. (Hopefully the Ducks will be playing well…)
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
(no)
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 25, 2011 6:52 AM PST up reply actions
no (as in) you don't hope the Ducks are playing well?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Wesley Matthews had no rebound!
Everyone else are recorded at least one.
Do do do dooo.
Do do do doooo.
What’s new pussycat? WooOoOowowooo!
What’s new pussycat? WooOooOoOoOooooooeoooo!
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 24, 2011 11:45 PM PST reply actions
Jersey Contest: Do the results for the Clippers game exist?
I know for the Indiana game there was none, but I think there was for that game in between the two Kings games.
And yes, that was a hard to predict game. While I thought losing was a possibility as is often with those “twice the same team in a week” game series ending 1-1 we were still the heavy favorites and I didn’t expect such a low-scoring game :-)
Just when you're tempted to hop back on the bandwagon...
These guys remind you why they’re fighting for the eighth seed
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
To be fair
last night was also a reminder of how miraculous it is that we are in contention for any seed at all.
This loss isn't any more substantial than a 5 game winning streak against
bad teams. It’s all part of being mediocre.
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
quick's twitter
LA’s x-ray negative; blazers schedule MRI for this afternoon.
sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
PHILLY!
remember, Camby's knee was supposed to be just fine
hoping for the best re: LMA. But he needs a rest not an all-star weekend
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
All in All
With Marcus out, Lamarcus having a sore hip and fighting off Demarcus with a not 100% Joel, Marks being voted as the worst player in the NBA, our giants didn’t have a chance against their giants.
We were considered resilient the last game because of all our injuries and Dre being sick, but still choked out a win. Dre still looked sick and we still have the same injuries, but after this game we are called mediocre. This makes me wonder about how many fans are Bi-Polar. The ups and downs of BB will drive many fans off the low end.
I made a comment after the last Sactown lost, that I wondered why the Kings didn’t win more games because they had some quality players and played good ball. Sooner or later good teams that has a losing streak will find their A game because of the adversity. Does that sound familiar?
I do agree this was more of Portland beating ourselves than the kings finally getting their A game together, but you do have to give the Kings a lot of credit. In fact, I predict a winning streak coming out of the kings.
All in All, we are doing fabulious for the amount of adversity we have had to over come. We will lose some shoulda games, win some shouldn’ta games, and keep on keeping on. In my book we are still a great exciting team to watch.
hg
Saw your post
the other day but it was too late to respond. Yah I guess we didn’t connect since last summer?
I agree the team is doing pretty good considering everything. I still haven’t made up my mind on McMillan but if they keep him (which I kinda doubt) I don’t think it would be so bad. Cho definitely has to shake things up though but most of the players are more valuable to us than they are marketable IMO. If a big trade is not made before the deadline I’d be surprised based on what Cho said about us having an idea about his grand plan by then if he finds some trading partners. That means he has chips on the table for sure. We need a big and some three point shooters? If they rely on the draft to rebuild I’m afraid it will be a slow fall and a slow rise especially with Roy’s contract.
Fans aren't as bi-polar as Hollinger's Power Rankings
The Blazers dropped from 12 to 17! And it’s not just because teams 12 through 17 are tightly packed.
This is a side note, but I find it odd that his season projections are so volatile at the half-way point. It’s not just Portland, either. Surely one game isn’t that meaningful, statistically.
"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave
Yeah, 12 to 17 are tightly packed, though
The difference between us at 17 and the Mavs at 12 is less than the difference between the Mavs at 12 and OKC at 10. And it’s a combination of the Kings being awful, us getting blown out (point differential matters a lot) and the fact that he weights recent results far more in the rankings that caused the drop.
I don't know how
Houston can be 14 @ 21-25
76ers 15 @ 19-25
Bucks 16 @ 16-26
AND Utah 18 @ 27-17
????Huh
My understanding is that it's about point differential.
Hollinger’s system treats wins differently by the point differential. A winning streak made of squeakers has much less impact than one that’s got a couple of blowouts mixed in.
"By the transitive property of General Manager idiocy, this means the Blazers traded Deron Williams for next year's heavily protected 1st Round Hornets pick plus the rights to Joel Freeland..." - Timbo
by conspirator5 on Jan 26, 2011 10:41 AM PST up reply actions
Dante had some great moments...
but Landry was too much for him more than a few times. (Dante’s put-back got the crowd out of their seats though.)
The team just kept trying to force the LMA thing, and it was NOT working last night. Hats off to Sac, as they were very quick to double, and had some quick feet.
Batum was ready to play and screamin’ open many times. On a night like that, the ball has to spend more time the hands of your next best options rather than forcing it…
Campaign to remove "Free-throw Guy" from the Rose Garden.
I think SAC is a better team than people give them credit for.
by BBlazer on Jan 25, 2011 9:46 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Yeah
when you think of it, a team with Evans, Udrih, Casspi, Cousins, Dalembert, and Landry… that team seems like at least a .400-.500 team. Good solid players.
by collectiveshane on Jan 25, 2011 11:09 AM PST up reply actions
They were pegged by many as a likely team on the rise this year
Evans injury really derailed things. And they lacked a leader without him.
They’re certainly better than their record now, but the Blazers were simply miserable last night. We beat ourselves.
"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave
they were who we thought they were!
and we let ’em off the hook!
if you want to crown them, then crown their…
j/k
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
At this point after two years of devastating injuries, I have a hard time getting too pissed off over bad losses.
I try to focus on individual players, how they are developing and cheering when something good happens. It’s not like expectations ought to be high at this point.
And like it or not, trades or not, Canzano tirades or not, it’s gonna be at least a couple years before we have reasons to have high expectations again. So I try to enjoy the ride for what it is.
by raoulduke on Jan 25, 2011 11:10 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
This
And actually, this line of thinking is just as important when your team is a contender as when it’s struggling. This is why L@kers fans are so easily hated. They’ve had their humility surgically removed and replaced with a sense of entitlement.
"By the transitive property of General Manager idiocy, this means the Blazers traded Deron Williams for next year's heavily protected 1st Round Hornets pick plus the rights to Joel Freeland..." - Timbo
by conspirator5 on Jan 26, 2011 10:44 AM PST up reply actions
The problem was we were giving the ball to LMA in isolation.
Dalembert is too long for LMA to deal with in iso, we should have been running pick n’ rolls, LMA could have continually rolled to the basket with no problem….
Nicolas Batum is the future of the Blazers

by 































