How Good was the Blazers 2009-2010 Season?

What do you think? Was the 2010 season subpar to the 2009 season?

Did we make progress? Did we inch closer to that elusive dance? Did the team mature, and are we a step ahead of where we left off from the previous season? Or were we mired in the mud and our progress flat lined for the whole year?

No doubt about it, it was incredible to get 50 wins from an injury riddled year. There are 410 games worth of playing time and we had 311 games worth of injury. But if you’re like me, I see 50 games in the win column and my first thought is we were 4 games worse than last year.

To take this team to the Finals, we have to keep inching forward. We have to make progress.

This is what it’s all about. We have to keep growing. If we intend to take it to the next level and start winning playoff games, we have to play the good teams better. Despite all the mayhem, chaos, broken knee caps, broken feet, broken backs, tendon pops, spilt beer, and swallowed whistles, I think  we in fact, did play the good teams better last year.

In my last post (Blazers Color Coded Season) something "finally" jumped off the page and hit me in the head. Despite all of the injuries, we played better against the good teams last year!

In 2009 our 82 game schedule had in it 24 games against teams with a mark of .610 or better.
In 2010 we played 33 games with an opponent that had a win mark .610 or better.
Against those teams (.610 or higher) in 2009 our win% was .416 (10 wins 14 losses)
In 2010 our win% against the same level of opponent was .455 (15 wins 18 losses)
In some respects it appears that we did have a better season in 2010.

We played 9 more games in 2010 (a significant amount) against stiff competition and came out ahead of where we were the year before.

Yes, we sprinkled in some losses against subpar teams we didn’t lose to the year before, but winning against the good teams is where it counts. This is where the rubber meets the road.

To highlight this, notice the league standings in the last 2 years. I’ve only listed the teams .500 or better.
In 2009 there were 9 teams with a record of .610 or better.
In 2010 there were  12 teams with a record of .610 or better.
The competition seems to have been stiffer in 2010.

2009       2010      
z - Cleveland 66 16 0.805 z - Cleveland 61 21 0.744
z - LA Lakers 65 17 0.793 y - Orlando 59 23 0.720
y - Boston 62 20 0.756 z - LA Lakers 57 25 0.695
y - Orlando 59 23 0.720 y - Dallas 55 27 0.671
y - Denver 54 28 0.659 x - Phoenix 54 28 0.659
y - San Antonio 54 28 0.659 y - Denver 53 29 0.646
x - Portland 54 28 0.659 x - Atlanta 53 29 0.646
x - Houston 53 29 0.646 x - Utah 53 29 0.646
x - Dallas 50 32 0.610 y - Boston 50 32 0.610
x - New Orleans 49 33 0.598 x - Portland 50 32 0.610
x - Utah 48 34 0.585 x - San Antonio 50 32 0.610
x - Atlanta 47 35 0.573 x - Oklahoma City 50 32 0.610
Phoenix 46 36 0.561 x - Miami 47 35 0.573
x - Miami 43 39 0.524 x - Milwaukee 46 36 0.561
x - Philadelphia 41 41 0.500 x - Charlotte 44 38 0.537
x - Chicago 41 41 0.500 Houston 42 40 0.512
        x - Chicago 41 41 0.500

I’ve expressed my thoughts above. What do you think? How significant is it that we played 9 more games (33 games in 2010, 24 games in 2009) against stiff competition and came out with a better record in 2010. Does it show progress; does it show that we developed some level of cohesion and team chemistry? I think it's noteworthy, and a platform to build on.

It’s tough to pose a question for this poll - Did we have a better season in 2010 versus 2009 in the sense that we’ve matured, team chemistry is better, and we are now better prepared to advance in the playoffs?

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Blazer's Edge

You must be a member of Blazer's Edge to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blazer's Edge. You should read them.

Join Blazer's Edge

You must be a member of Blazer's Edge to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blazer's Edge. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.