OT: Second BE Book Club Discussion
- A couple months back, a few of us in the Junk Drawer decided to start the first unofficial Blazersedge bookclub. The first book that was read by the bookclub was Last Days by Brian Evenson. The second book, and the one discussed below, was Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami. If you read any further in this thread, this book will have been SPOILED for you. You have been warned. But anybody who reads the book is welcome to contribute to the conversation. If you like the idea of taking part in the bookclub's next book discussion, it will be “Matterhorn” by Karl Marlantes. More information to follow. Each person who reads the book should feel free to post what you felt about reading this and what the experience was like for you. If you want to dig deeper, go ahead. I've made a few simple questions that could be used to get people started. If other people have points and questions, just bring them up. Then we can discuss with one another to understand each of our points and see what kind of conversation happens. Thanks go to Idoltime for the original outline of this description, I just changed things as needed.
- Many Murakami scholars and fans, including myself, have felt that this book is the most auto-biographical in the author's canon. Murakami is known for his privacy, yet there are many aspects of this novel that feel very real. What stood out to you that felt more human, that felt more like it could have been an auto-biographical piece of the work?
- As Watanabe's story unfolds he becomes very close to both Naoko and Midori. How are these women different from one another? In which ways do you find them similar to one another? How would you describe the different kinds of love they offer Watanabe? Why do you think he finally chooses Midori? Has he made the right choice?
- Watanabe often speaks about “The Great Gatsby” and how closely he relates to Fitzgerald's novel. Why do you think this is important, and what does it say of Watanabe?
- This is going to be a two part-er cause you can only make 5 points in the “lists” fanshot. First, what is the importance of the two central men in Watanabe's life? Stromtrooper(Kamikaze if you managed to snatch the Birnbaum translation) and Nagasawa? How do these characters help define Watanabe, and how do they define themselves(as little definition as there may be). And lastly, many people have agreed that the Jay Rubin translation seems to be lacking and the fairly poor prose takes away from the enjoyment of the novel. How did the prose effect you? Are there any particular instances in which you experienced every translator's nightmare, that moment where you realized, without a doubt, that you were reading a book that had been translated? I'm dropping this post off and then I have to disappear again for a bit, but will pop in as I can to enjoy, and join, the discussion.
over 1 year ago
GiantBlazer
55 comments
7 recs |
Comments
I didn't read the book this time
So the discussion will be lacking my valuable insight this go around. Nonetheless, I wish you all a very merry and stimulating chat!
Still on the Rex bandwagon.
rec'd (let's get this up there while we discuss it)
Good questions, gb! im too gbidol’d to discuss now ,but i’ll comment sometime in the next 36 hours
I liked the book. I have also read “Kafka on the Shore” and felt that was quality work as well. I will withhold more detailed opinions until the discussion gets underway (plus I finished it three weeks ago and will have to refresh myself of the details). Suffice it to sat that, I felt the character was very identifiable despite the obvious cultural differences.
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
I liked the book overall. I do think the translation was kind of lame— Watanabe is always saying stuff like “I see what you mean” or “that makes sense.”
Watanabe was always getting praise from Midori from the way he spoke
and I thought the same as you did… That was definitely something that didn’t translate.
Slow weekend for book talking.
Maybe things will pick up more later. I’mma try to answer these questions
1 Many Murakami scholars and fans, including myself, have felt that this book is the most auto-biographical in the author’s canon. Murakami is known for his privacy, yet there are many aspects of this novel that feel very real. What stood out to you that felt more human, that felt more like it could have been an auto-biographical piece of the work?
I am not going to try and comment across the board on Murakami’s work, but this piece felt entirely autobiographical. For me, it seemed that way because the point of the story was these connections.. very human connections.. between Watanabe and the girls in his life.
2 As Watanabe’s story unfolds he becomes very close to both Naoko and Midori. How are these women different from one another? In which ways do you find them similar to one another? How would you describe the different kinds of love they offer Watanabe? Why do you think he finally chooses Midori? Has he made the right choice?
Good question. Might need to think more on this. Naoko is so defined by her illness and her inability to be for Watanabe. Their love is grounded in their past but Kizuki was always between them. Midori is harder for me to get, but she is pretty open and emotional in a non-need-to-go-away kind of way. Midori is a fine choice but it’s hard to say if he made the right choice. She was the one who was ready and loved him openly… but their connection never felt as honest as between him and Naoko so I wondered if he wasn’t just settling for the best available number 2 because he didn’t wanna be alone. Also, I don’t understand how hooking up with Reiko fits in with this. If I was to take a second to psychoanalyze Watanabe on this matter, I’d say that he should be alone and not try so hard to be with someone. I guess he did that to a degree, and I have my suspicion that he and Midori do not end up together because I think the ending of the book is suggesting that he has ended up in a place he doesn’t recognize ‘from the center’ meaning that he finds that he doesn’t know who he is anymore.
3 Watanabe often speaks about "The Great Gatsby" and how closely he relates to Fitzgerald’s novel. Why do you think this is important, and what does it say of Watanabe?
Good one. Even less sure where to begin. I think Watanabe identifies with Fitz’ detached writing style on the one hand and with the dreamer quality in Gatsby on the other.
4 what is the importance of the two central men in Watanabe’s life? Stromtrooper(Kamikaze if you managed to snatch the Birnbaum translation) and Nagasawa? How do these characters help define Watanabe, and how do they define themselves(as little definition as there may be).
Honestly, I wasn’t sure what Stromtroopers role as except to be a great source of comic relief and the source of Watanabe’s willingness and interest in cleaning. Not sure what the meaning of that character was.
Nagasawa makes a lot of sense from a plot and symbolism point of view. I liked this character as a contrast to Watanabe. They are both Gatsby fans but fairly different other than that (which is amusing since Nagasawa likes to say they are exactly alike). Watanabe sees somethings he wishes he could be (like some of the more flashy and gregarious features of Gatsby) in Nagasawa but also quickly realizes that, if he had Nagasawa’s life, he wouldn’t do what he did.. he would instead be thrilled to have someone as great as Hatsumi. In the end, Nagasawa just seemed like a lesson, or a reality check, for Watanabe about what dreams should look like.
5 Many people have agreed that the Jay Rubin translation seems to be lacking and the fairly poor prose takes away from the enjoyment of the novel. How did the prose effect you? Are there any particular instances in which you experienced every translator’s nightmare, that moment where you realized, without a doubt, that you were reading a book that had been translated? I’m dropping this post off and then I have to disappear again for a bit, but will pop in as I can to enjoy, and join, the discussion.
Jake had a good one up there. The two reoccurring moments for me that made the language stand out and feel odd was the sex scenes and the way people commented on the way Watanabe’s spoke. At several points I felt like the sex scenes were written in a manner or used words in a manner that just felt awkward in how they were phrased. I’d be curious to know how these differed across translations. And as far as the way he spoke, I just could never figure out what the girls were talking about. I couldn’t figure out the source of Midori’s constant noting about how weird he says things and wondered if it was lost in translation or if I just missed something.
Good questions, GB. And good book choice. I enjoyed the read even if the words themselves felt odd to me at times I got over it. Also, I feel it’s important to note, that I was emotionally hit hard by this book in ways I didn’t suspect would get me. Young love, suicides, and the words: ‘Death is not the opposite of life but an innate part of life’ hit me in a more powerful way today than they would have, say, a year ago.
Which reminds me of the other question that occurred to me was the role and purpose of suicide and sex in this story. If I thought anything negative about the story itself, it was that there times that I questioned whether the sex scenes were necessary or just part of keeping young readers in an otherwise very heady and emotional story. I was more surprised by the sex in the story than I was at the number of suicides in the story.
what surprised me about the suicides was the way it was a choice for so many characters
and the way it was written about, people “died” for the author, where I would have said “killed him/herself”. I don’t know if i’ve managed to say what i want here.
Good point on the language there that I hadn't picked up on.
The only reason why the suicides being the choice for so many characters is because it feels like such a common theme in fiction on Japanese youth. They seem to take it for granted that half or more of the people one would know growing up would choose to take their own life. But the more I write about it and think about the choice of wording I wonder whether considering suicide as normal and natural as the conclusion of any illness means something specific here.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
"Suicide...a common theme in fiction on Japanese youth."
↑ I did not know this. But if this is the case, it does explain why suicide seems to be downplayed so much in the book (like you guys said, made to seem so natural). I realize that that kind of stuff can run in the family and whatnot, but what are the chances that so many friends around Watanabe committed suicide (Kizuki, Naoko, Hatsumi)? I would even throw Reiko out there as another troubled individual.
It might be worth noting the temporal setting of the story; I think this was in the 1960’s(?) From the student revolutions in the book, I’m assuming that it was a period of much political/economical change for Japan. Maybe that lends to a stressful lifestyle and suicide rates were high…
I’m not sure how much we can speculate on the language of the text, since this is a translation. This is where GB, Ash, or someone who knows Japanese could help. Does the original language make a clear, pointed distinction between “died” and “killed him/herself?”
It'd DEFINITELY be worth getting GB or someone's opinion on the language part of this.
The points you bring up about the temporal setting are important too. Still, even though you’ll find suicide as a topic in American literature from times like that, I don’t think suicide is ever used to the same degree in an American story that wasn’t exclusively about suicide.
That was the thing for me. With so many suicides, one might guess that maybe the story was about suicide.. but, again, the suicides were treated more like a natural disaster or something like dying in war. Just something to be sad about but not too surprised about no matter how many times it seems to happen.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
they have significantly different words for dying and committing suicide
there’s no way an editor would every let Rubin get away with translating that wrong. As I just mentioned, suicide is a lot more common in Japan, and the setting of the novel is key to understand this. It was a time of great confusion and upheaval in Japan. Japanese youth were still dealing with the aftereffects of WWII back then (heck, some of them still have to), and Japan was rapidly becoming a very Westernized culture, much to the dismay of a lot of their people.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
Suicide is so much more common in Japan than it is in the US that it's truly inexplicable.
Over here suicide is viewed as an act of absolute disgust and is very disgraceful. People viewed the deceased as selfish and inconsiderate. Western religion also views it as a very “sinful” act. In Japan they can take their life with honor, and for many years it was respected, and even expected, for someone who had fallen far in life (whether professionally or personally). It’s not as common as it used to be, but still much more so than it is in the US. And because of the rich history of suicide in their culture, it happens in a lot of their literature.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
Is this true (the honorableness of suicide)
even when they are young? I can get my head around honorable suicides to some degree in a certain context and mindset, but it is hard to figure it out with these young kids who just seem a little lost in a time where if you don’t feel a little lost — yore not doing it right.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Thanks for being the first one to response seriously, Idol.
this part was really interesting to me both times I read it
and I have my suspicion that he and Midori do not end up together because I think the ending of the book is suggesting that he has ended up in a place he doesn’t recognize ‘from the center’ meaning that he finds that he doesn’t know who he is anymore.It seems like he’s in a weird place of almost “non being” at the end of the book. The final scene shows a sense of profound ‘lostness,’ if you will. It seems that Watanabe not only has no idea where he is, but he also no longer knows who he is.
I’m glad you liked the book!
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
Yes, this is what I felt.
It’ll be interesting to see your thoughts on the chances of Watanabe committing suicide later in life. He is seems pretty grounded most of the time but he’s so far from where he started.
And thanks for the great book suggestion!
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Whatever they say, it's a lie!
I think I’ve seen him and DTL chat about it in the JDs here and there.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
It’s mostly Watanabe’s introspective moments that made the work seem autobiographical to me. This line is one example: "Everything was too sharp and clear, so that I could never tell where to start – the way a map that shows too much can sometimes be useless" (10). Although the narrator is Watanabe, talking about how he found it difficult to write about Naoko, it feels like an observation made by the author – who would know a thing or two about writing – himself. Also, the quote that Idol mentions – "death exists, not as the opposite but as a part of life" – stands out as a personal revelation that makes it feel more human (25).
The main similarity that I see between Naoko and Midori is that both have to deal with the deaths of their closed ones. That’s about it, because the way in which they actually deal with them differs. Naoko isn’t as strong an individual as Midori; she becomes mentally unstable and eventually chooses death. Midori seems to have this volatile, maybe even eccentric, personality, but I don’t see her as someone who would commit suicide. Even during the rooftop/fire scene, it feels like Midori is saying that she wouldn’t shy away from death if it does come, not that she would actively seek it. As far as their love for Watanabe goes, Midori’s is very obvious. She confesses it many times, and only waits for him to accept her. In the case of Naoko, Watanabe is the one doing the waiting. He even says near the beginning of the book that, "Naoko never loved me" (10). Her feeling for him is confusing to understand, like this line: "I just don’t want to be violated like that again – by anybody" (284). I’m not sure how she feels, or that she knows what she wants. Midori is simpler to understand; she likes Watanabe so she repeatedly takes the initiative to approach him. I agree with Idol as to why Watanabe chooses Midori (next best alternative). Also, I think she is to him as he is to Kizuki, Naoko, and Reiko: a link to the "outside" world. Agree with Idol again that it doesn’t seem like they’ll end up together. As a matter of fact, I wouldn’t’ve been surprised if Watanabe had committed suicide himself. (Side note about Midori: page 180, when we find out that she lied about her father being in Uruguay, I thought for a moment that she was the pathological liar in Reiko’s story. Creeped me out.)
Watanabe may identify with Gatsby because he also loves someone that can’t be had. They’re both similar in wanting to distance themselves from their past, to reinvent themselves, too.
I sort of see Storm Trooper as a bridge that closes the gap between Watanabe and the other characters in the book. Watanabe mentions at one point that "the world was at peace and filled with laughter as long as stories of Storm Trooper were being told" (105). Those stories are the first things that he talks to Naoko about. Then he also tells them to Midori, and then Reiko. Even in the dorm, tales of ST jerking off form the majority of the communication between Watanabe and the other guys. Nagasawa: see Idol’s comment. (I wanna add that he reminded me of AK a bit, in how both would acknowledge their flaws, call themselves jerks or whatnot, but they’re completely comfy with who they are nevertheless.)
The translation felt most tedious to me when it was about this city or that train station that Watanabe needs to get to at this or that time. It especially felt that way since I don’t know where anywhere is. Maybe Murakami is implying the significance of the protagonist always being on the move, from city to countryside and whatnot, but some parts felt unnecessarily detailed. Some of the sex scenes were also weirdish.
Overall, I liked the book. Good book selection and questions, GB. My bad for putting this off til now.
Good thoughts
I am still trying to figure out what the meaning of the one successful sexual encounter between Naoko and Watanabe meant in for the story. Why was she ready for him when she hadn’t been before? Why did this not really matter in the end? Why was it this violation that she’d never repeat? This isn’t clear to me.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Yeah I'm puzzled by it as well
why would she call it a violation when she clearly wanted it? Did it just happen as a way to draw Watanabe even more into her web.
This is something I couldn't really figure out either.
What was Watanabe to her? What was Reiko to her? The way the story is told, the death of Naoke is, basically, a given fact the whole time. And the way she pulls people to her.. I don’t know. I definitely felt an uncertainty as to what we should have come to understand about her.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
I wouldn't say that she "clearly wanted it."
Maybe we can distinguish between being “physically” and “psychologically” ready. Her body was ready for him the way it never was before for Kizuki, but even when they were having sex Watanabe notes that it was the saddest sound of orgasm he’s ever heard…I think the “violation” sentiment comes from her feeling that it happened at a time when she was particularly vulnerable and in need of having someone. I recall Watanabe also contemplating before whether it had been the right thing to do then.
And I'm just throwing this out there:
Could it be that she thinks it’s an insult to the memories of Kizuki that she was physically ready for Watanabe and not for the guy who she grew up with and loved?
It is a more than reasonable thing to consider.
But why was she physical ready for him? What did that mean to them, to her, to him, to their story? Was she ready because of who Watanabe was to her through Kizuki?
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
That is what I can't seem to explain to myself
what is the meaning of the fact that “she was wet” for Watanabe, the day they celebrated her birthday, and never before and never again?
Yes, me too.
This and the sex he has with Reiko is strange to me. I can’t figure out if it is supposed to mean something, if it is just sex, or what. But I expected that he’d end up with Naoke at least once. Even though it didn’t make sense, he clearly talked about her as one he was intimate with the whole time. So although I don’t get her motivations, his are easy. But what about Reiko? What was that about?
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Seriously!
And what was the deal with that whole crazy story of her and the student that tried to hook up with her? What was that supposed to do for us? Because that started making me feel a little like Murakami infused some extra sex (including a near lesbian affair with a young girl) to be enticing. it was hard to always get the meaning of sex in this story.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
argh
I had just typed a longer reply to this and then SBN decided to tweak out. I think that others have touched on what I think it was supposed to be. I think this was meant as a symbol of Naoko’s weakness in that moment, her inability to really control herself or the world around her. As we come to realize throughout the novel she is a very flawed character who is very emotionally distraught. Many emotionally unstable people make decisions they come to regret, sometimes only moments later.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions
How do you think this relates to Watanbe's relationship to her and Kizuki?
And do you think she felt more betrayed by herself or Watanabe for that?
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Definitely more betrayed by herself
when she explains that she could never get wet for Kizuki, you can feel how it disappoints her that it happened with Watanabe.
Yeah, this is what I think too.
Although I got the feeling that it disappointed/confused her more that it never worked with Kizuki. Another interesting thing related to this is how she explains how having Watanabe around made talking with Kizuki easier.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Many Murakami scholars and fans, including myself, have felt that this book is the most auto-biographical in the author’s canon. Murakami is known for his privacy, yet there are many aspects of this novel that feel very real. What stood out to you that felt more human, that felt more like it could have been an auto-biographical piece of the work?
Perhaps the lack of story outside that of Watanabe’s his perceptions and his view all the sorrounding developments.
As Watanabe’s story unfolds he becomes very close to both Naoko and Midori. How are these women different from one another? In which ways do you find them similar to one another? How would you describe the different kinds of love they offer Watanabe? Why do you think he finally chooses Midori? Has he made the right choice?
He chooses Midori because he has chosen to live and that is clearly Midori’s choice as well. I definitely think he made the right choice.
Watanabe often speaks about "The Great Gatsby" and how closely he relates to Fitzgerald’s novel. Why do you think this is important, and what does it say of Watanabe?
I feel it is somehow related to the tragedies sorrounding his own life and the detachment of the people sourrounding him regarding life.
This is going to be a two part-er cause you can only make 5 points in the "lists" fanshot. First, what is the importance of the two central men in Watanabe’s life? Stromtrooper(Kamikaze if you managed to snatch the Birnbaum translation) and Nagasawa? How do these characters help define Watanabe, and how do they define themselves(as little definition as there may be). And lastly, many people have agreed that the Jay Rubin translation seems to be lacking and the fairly poor prose takes away from the enjoyment of the novel. How did the prose effect you? Are there any particular instances in which you experienced every translator’s nightmare, that moment where you realized, without a doubt, that you were reading a book that had been translated? I’m dropping this post off and then I have to disappear again for a bit, but will pop in as I can to enjoy, and join, the discussion.
I read stromtrooper as stormtrooper all throughout the book. Admittedly I was feverish while I read it, so I have an excuse. I agree with idol about him. To me he’s there as a way for Watanabe to break the ice with people, and have comedic relief.
The translation was certainly something I noticed, especially regarding, as others have mentioned, the way Watanabe speaks.
sorry by my poor answers but I did read it in a terrible state :(
by the way GB, I really liked it, thanks for the choice!
your answers are wonderful FFA!
thank you for answering at all! Sorry I didn’t come back. I thought everyone gave up on this so I wasn’t really coming back in. Then someone said it was back up like a week ago and I popped in and I didn’t see anything new (I’m gonna go ahead and blame SBN for that one). Now I come today and there is lots of fun things to talk about!
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm curious, why do you think he definitely made the right choice in choosing Midori?
As I’ve said above, I wouldn’t’ve been surprised if Watanabe had reached a breaking point, cracked, and committed suicide. We know from the retrospective style in which the book’s written that of course he didn’t kill himself. But even when he hears that song on the plane Watanabe is overwhelmed by all his emotions. How much has he moved on from that past? Enough to make a true, solid relationship with Midori possible?
I guess I find it the right choice
because it’s the only reasonable choice. I too would be overwhelmed by something that reminded me of a love that i could never understand nor truly have. I think he could have found a way to let Midori save him from all the darkness sorrounding his life.
Plagiarism:
I’d say that he should be alone and not try so hard to be with someone. I guess he did that to a degree, and I have my suspicion that he and Midori do not end up together because I think the ending of the book is suggesting that he has ended up in a place he doesn’t recognize ‘from the center’ meaning that he finds that he doesn’t know who he is anymore.
I guess what I’m asking is, how is Midori a reasonable choice? So Naoko loses Kizuki, and settles for Watanabe, and now that Watanabe loses Naoko, he should pick Midori?
I’m just playing devil’s advocate and throwing some questions out there…
He says he loves them both
and only one is a reasonable choice. Otherwise, he doesn’t love Midori. It is different to Naoko/Kizuki because Naoko never loved Watanabe, even though she tries hard to do so, as a way of holding on to life and sanity.
Watanabe is in love with both, or else you think he was lying twhen he admits to himself that he is in love with Midori.
Would it be considered lying if the protagonist himself doesn't know what's the truth?
I feel like Watanabe is un narrador indigno de confianza. I don’t buy it when he suddenly says — especially right after getting into bed with Midori — that he loves her. It felt like that just came out of nowhere. I’m not sure how deep his love for her is, especially when compared to the much more sacrificial love that he has for Naoko. It also doesn’t help things that the narrator emphasized that “she was a real, live girl with blood in her veins, and she was putting her warm body in my arms.” It’s so natural to feel that attraction, I wouldn’t necessarily equate it with love.
I see a parallel between Watanabe’s significance to Naoko and Midori’s significance to Watanabe. So whatever that may be — be it true love or just a link to life/sanity/outside world — I feel like it should be the same for both pairs. This is probably why I don’t agree that Naoko doesn’t really love Watanabe but he actually does love Midori. In my mind, their relationships are too similar.
Now that you say it
hooking up with Reiko might be the means to (dis)prove the strengh of his love for Midori, and that he had really lied to himself in the heat of the moment. But I am almost certain something in the three relationships Watanabe has is lost in translation.
Yeah
I wish GB would help us out with that.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
I'm real sorry for the delays, guys.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I think Reiko is really his consolation prize, if you will
that’s a really crass way of putting it, but I think that Watanabe build a connection with her over his time with Naoko and that the sex with her was the most meaningless of all his relationships. He was a young man going through a very heavy and difficult time of his life, both personally and culturally.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions
This is an interesting way of looking at it.
Something that I never occurred to me until reading your response were the similarities in how Reiko was to Watanabe Naokewhat and Watanabe was to Naoko and Kizuki.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
I really like your thoughts on the book, t, thanks for chiming in.
I think each of us, in our lifetime, have maybe one or two profound loves, yet we also encounter other people who we “love” and it is a true love, but not always as profound and perfect as those super rare occasions are. I think Naoko was the one profound love of Watanabe’s life, and this is evident in both that she was the first one to come back to him upon hearing “Norwegian Wood” and the many hints he gives throughout the novel. I also think he loved Midori, but in a more spur of the moment, lustful way.
I guess an easier way for me to say this is that if Watanabe were to build a life with both women in alternate universes, his life would carry out happily with Naoko but I fear he would grow tired of/fall out of love with Midori.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions
That looks familiar.
Well, Midori is clearly more reasonable a choice compared to Naoko, even before she dies. But I don’t think he really choose Midori or really loved her. If he did, I don’t think that his immediate reactions would have been to run around and doing his own thing and sleeping with Reiko. I think he just likes the way Midori loves him.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
Heehee.
It was either blockquote or paraphrase; I chose the lazy way.
I agree with all of this. Midori is reasonable compared to Naoko, the same way a happy meal hamburger is more desirable a meal than a rock. But if you had more, better options, who would pick either of one of them?
It's important to consider the maturity of Watanabe also.
He has no options, but he also can’t handle being alone and is seeking out comfort and intimacy. In some ways, even though he likes to claim that he is rather different from Nagasawa, and I didn’t really think a lot about this but maybe he isn’t really that different at all. Maybe the only real differences is that Nagasawa just goes with what he wants and Watanabe is on the fence of trying to find something more “real” and “intimate” than those casual encounter but seemingly unable actually to become who he wants to be.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?
But if you had more, better options, who would pick either of one of them?
One of the most profound realizations of my life is that we cannot choose whom we fall in love with. There are people on this planet that will come around and strike a chord with you, they will have this magical, inexplicable power over you and you’ll find yourself madly, head over heels, in love with them, no matter how much you might not want to. The “better option” from a logical standpoint may exist, but we, as humans, don’t live life based on statistics and logic. We are creatures of emotion and there’s no getting away from that.
Watanabe found himself in love with Naoko in a way that he couldn’t explain and even though she made it clear she could never love him back, he remained in love with until the day she died, and long passed. I’ve had (still have, to be honest) one person in my life that I experienced this with. One person whom I’m so terribly in love with, disregarding the fact that there will never be a romantic relationship between the two of us. I think the main reason I loved this book so much the first time I read it comes from my connecting to this aspect of the story so strongly. Being so very in love with someone that it has an effect on all of your every day life is a powerful and difficult thing to overcome. There’s this beautiful poem by W.S. Merwin that I read on Tri-Met’s “poetry in motion” a few years back: Separation
Your absence has gone through meThe first time I read that poem I was struck by how connected to it I was and how very true it felt to me. When you love a person so much you find yourself thinking about them with every decision you make. I feel that this poem works for Watanabe’s case as well, because even though the novel tells of his other loves, it is, at it’s heart, about his true love for Naoko.
Like thread through a needle.
Everything I do is stitched with its color.
He does also find himself loving Midori, but as I said further up in the discussion, I think his love for Midori was less profound and he sort of found himself “loving” her simply because he couldn’t have Naoko and Midori was a fun, quirky girl that loved him. Think of her as a “rebound girl” if that makes it easier.
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."
by GiantBlazer on Sep 13, 2010 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I do think you are on to something good here.
And this is the sentiment that most perfectly reflects my feelings reading this book:
I think the main reason I loved this book so much the first time I read it comes from my connecting to this aspect of the story so strongly. Being so very in love with someone that it has an effect on all of your every day life is a powerful and difficult thing to overcome.
Is life not a hundred times too short for us to stifle ourselves?































