Division Rivals
Much of the talk in the last couple years has surrounded Portland's ongoing battles with division rivals Utah and Denver. The Jazz were the team the Blazers originally set their sights on in the early Roy years, assuming that the career arcs of Roy and point guard Deron Williams would place them (and their teams) squarely in each others' sights for eventual Western supremacy. Then the Denver Nuggets snagged Chauncey Billups. He patched up the cracks in their fractured roster, got their immense talent playing together, and unapologetically crashed the Western party. Give or take an injury-scrubbed season or two, for the last couple of years these three teams have fought tooth and nail. Many Portland fans think the current champs are the obstacle standing between Portland and ultimate success, but before that matchup takes on significance the Blazers will have to take care of business in their own division.
So I put it to you, entering 2010-11 how do you see these three teams stacking up against each other? You can talk strict head-to-head, talk number of expected regular-season wins, talk who would have the advantage in a seven-game series, or all of the above. Will the Blazers surpass their rivals this year or is this going to be another divisional dogfight?
Register your opinions below.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
128 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No reason Portland can't win the division
Utah isn’t getting any better (Boozer/Jefferson swap was pretty much a lateral move), Denver won’t be in the running now that it looks like Melo getting traded is “when” rather than “if,” and I still think Portland is a better overall team than OKC despite them being media darlings of the moment.
Durant will be great
Don’t underestimate KD. Needs a bit more help around him, but they will be a force this year.
OKC did well last year
and should do better this year. They still aren’t in Portland’s class with Portland healthy – but the difference will show up mostly in head to head matchups.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 27, 2010 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions
I actually doubt that OKC will do better than they did last season.
They had nearly perfect health, and many teams went into playing OKC with little enthusiasm in the beginning of the year, so they snagged a lot of wins just by taking other teams by surprise, they won’t have that luxury this year.
Totally agree.
Well said.
"I come to you now, at the turn of the tide." -- Brandon "Gandalf" Roy, April 24th, 2010
just as our 50 wins last year were harder than our 54 the year before
Depsite the injuries, the Blazers worked much harder for those 50 wins as teams were not overlooking the Blazers last year.
that is EXACTLY what I was thinking when I read the blurb about OKC and teams
not being ready for them last season..THIS was how the 54 win season was for the Blazers, I am sure. However, the Blazers did have more injuries in that season (Greg was also injured, Blake was injured for a significant time, Brandon missed some time(Boston game comes to mind), Nic Batum at the end of the season, Rudy after the Ariza take down…. than OKC had in their season last year.
So the Blazers may have been a bit better…more wins despite more injuries…but BOTH benefited from the "ah…we can beat THEM "mentality…..
But…here is a caveat…how about this? Did any teams take the Blazers less seriously EVEN LAST YEAR…BECAUSE OF THEIR INJURY RIDDLED STATUS????
50 wins will be a major milestone
but I still think they will be a better team than they were last year. Record itself is an overrated stat.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 27, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
OKC has a leader who is very very strong willed.
This leader is taller than listed and this should be changed in the stats. KD is taller than 6’ 9".
I think OKC is going to be very good and they will probably be the division leaders unless the Blazers pick up their offense movement and defense.
Am hoping GO has a good year and stays relatively healthy. He probably will, given it’s his contract year.
Am also hoping the new coaching staff teaches the Blazers to set screens and move around them.
I think the Blazers will win the division if Brandon’s actions speak as well as his words and he picks up his leadership this year.
I'm assuming that 2009/2010 is your Blazer baseline
for the Blazers to play as poorly as they did last season (50 win team that finished ahead of OKC) – a lot of things have to go wrong. For OKC to win as many as they did last season – they have to be better than they were. Considering how perfect their season went, counting on them to be better might be be throwing them way too big a bone.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 27, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
The breaking Carmelo news has a big affect on this.
I’d say it goes like this:
1. Blazers
2. Jazz
3. Nuggets
I rank the Nuggets lowest because they’re a team that shows almost every likelihood of imploding soon, and Chauncey Billups, who’s the one that’s really made it happen for that team, is getting old enough that his decline becomes more and more likely. I’d be impressed if they could get good value for Carmelo and reload, but even then they’d probably dip below 50 wins for a season or two.
I rank the Jazz below us for a couple reasons. First, they want to avoid paying the luxury tax. And if you don’t want to pay the luxury tax, it’s hard to make those all-in commitments that must be risked to become a 55 or 60 win team instead of just a consistent 50 or 52 win team (as I’m sure they will continue to be). Plus they got worse. Jefferson is good, but not as good as Boozer not to mention the required on-court adjustments, Okur’s still hurt, and they lost a number of good players. So they’ll be good, but I can’t see them improving much at all.
In fact I think we’re better than the Jazz even without Oden, mainly based on Camby and how our season went after we got him (even without Roy being healthy or Przy playing). Looking forward to it. And I think if we do face the Jazz in a playoff series, we will need Oden much more, to be a terror in the paint and punish their lack of a true starting center on both ends.
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
Maybe we could pick up an aging Chauncey Billups in a few seasons
just so he can shoot free throws. That’s ONE shot he almost never misses.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 26, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions
A younger Chauncey Billups is basically the perfect point guard for this team.
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
Just like a younger Marcus Camby is the perfect PF for this team
Imagine for a second, 2005 Billups/Roy/Batum/2000 Camby/Oden
That core win championships.
| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |
And because they won three consecutive NBA Finals, avoids the worst record in the league, sending LaMarcus Aldridge to the Bucks...
Wait a minute…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 27, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions
new competition
It aint utah anymore, they loss momentum when they loss boozer and got jefferson in return. the only good thing they perhaps reconciled their summer was picking up raja bell who is a great defender and can shoot the three.
Denver is still a great teamm, but if mello doesnt wanna be there, then their are not gonna be as good as they could be.
Its all about OKC now. Their already a well organized and good team, but once they get a reliable center, their gonna be an incredibly difficult team to beat.
Its gonna be a dogfight to the end, as always and should be in the pacific.
Minnesota. The answer is Minnesota.
"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban
by Norsktroll on Aug 26, 2010 11:32 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Only they can beat the Jazz three times a season...
Which defies all logical explanation. I assume Boozer just got lazy.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 26, 2010 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions
This explains why the Jazz picked up Jefferson
Jefferson is Zbo 2.0 and will kill Jazz ball movement. It sahould make it easier for us to get 3 (though I’d settle for 2) wins over the Jazz this year.
will be interesting to see
but i bet you a nickle that dwill turns jefferson into an allstar if jefferson stays healthy the whole season. players tend to change attitude under jerry sloan.
not really sure that boozer is better than jefferson, either.
Jefferson has already played at allstar level,he doesn't need DWill to make him better...
The season that he tore is ACL (two years ago) he was definitely playing well enough to be an allstar. It remains a travesty In my opinion, that Jefferson (& Durant) were passed over for an All Star bid for Shaq and David West…They were both beasts during first half of that season. At the time the conventional wisdom was that they didn’t make it since their team’s records weren’t great. However, Harris and Granger, made All Star team in east that year, while playing on sub .500 teams, so I don’t totally buy that explanation…
Either way, with another year removed from surgery, I expect Jefferson to return his all-star form. DWILL will just be the icing on his cake.
I'm sorry, but Al Jefferson doesn't do it for me. Inefficient shooting, poor passing, and ...
lax defense are all huge flaws of his — which puts him on par with a former Portland Trail Blazer in Zach Randolph — thus, I’d argue he’s a clear downgrade from Carlos Boozer. Well, at least on offense; it’s probably a wash on defense.
Until Roy and the team are able to win the series against the Jazz,
they and the Nuggets are unfortunately better than the Blazers.
That’s not going to last, but these division losses at home Have. To. STOP. Right off the bat, the Nuggets won in the Rose Garden. Come Christmas, the Blazers turned the tables, but they still lost the series 3-1. The Jazz were worse; they actually swept the Blazers last year. That’s two too many Utah wins in the Rose Garden for my liking.
Checking last year’s results, we actually had the best road record of all the teams in the Northwest Division at 24-17.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 26, 2010 11:52 PM PDT reply actions
Past performance is not a reliable predictor of future performance.
Need I remind you that the Blazers lost 300+ player games to injury? How that team, which played without a center for 2+ months, fared against the Nuggs and Jazz last year has very little to do with this coming season.
Compare our projected front court rotation: Oden, LMA, Camby, Pryz, Cunningham, Pendy to last season when 36 year old Howard played over 1600 minutes, and two rookies played over 1200. It simply isn’t the same team.
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 5:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I think the previous poster's point
is that we had a bad habit last year of losing to divisional opponents and some of those were early in the season when we were still healthy.
As tight as the NW division race is we cant afford division losses like that. We have to at least break even on the season series with them if not win them. When the race is close like that we need all the tie breakers and home court advantage we can get. Its basically as if a divisional loss is twice as bad because of the impact on these things.
We did have a ton of injuries last year and every year is a new year but I think it is a very valid point for the Blazers to make an emphasis on winning division games and series this year.
by Boise Blazer on Aug 27, 2010 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions
No disagreement about the need to take care of business.
I am just trying to point out how much has changed. Not only did we have a huge amount of injuries last season, but we also had the whole Blake/Miller fiasco at the beginning of the season. Barring a big trade, we are entering this season with a great deal more clarity regarding roles, and with our quarterback Miller, much more familiar with our team.
Obviously, we still have to integrate Oden, and I don’t want to underestimate the significance of that, but I think everybody probably learned a lot during the rough patch at the beginning of last season. Roy and LMA each seem to be working hard, Camby is on board, and the young guys have all had a bit of seasoning. I think it all bodes well.
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well said
Or in other words we will have all the pieces in place to be more successful. It will come down to our attitude on how we handle those games.
by Boise Blazer on Aug 27, 2010 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions
In addition to the Miller/Blake fiasco we also were out Batum
Though Martell lit up the Jazz once, we are clearly better with Batum at the 3.
Well said upper left corner!!!! Rec!!!
Another factor that may be a BIG one is Buck Williams. He was the final piece to the Blazers teams who won quite a bit.
A winning attitude goes a long long way.
The Jazz will miss Boozer
the guys a stud. When he was well, he pretty much had his way with us. They will be worse wihout him and alot softer in the middle on both ends of the court.
The Bulls need another guy to take long twos, don't they?
Boozer will fit right in.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
Manning drops back to pass, Comedic.Sans and Wilfork come flying in and SACK him for a loss of twelve on 3rd and goal!
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 27, 2010 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Well they have Tom Thibodeau instead of VDN
So I doubt their offense will continue to be that bad.
Incidentally, regarding your sig, Firefox has a built-in spellchecker (and I bet Chrome does too).
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
I'm not so sure that some of those shots were VDN's fault...
How much was he getting paid to shoot threes from halfcourt? Did VDN have a bonus if he won MVP? Or had a 50%+ shooting percentage? Probably not.
Sometimes, it’s just the player panicking in traffic and tossing it up. Sometimes, it means you airball it for an awful turnover, but it happens.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
Manning drops back to pass, Comedic.Sans and Wilfork come flying in and SACK him for a loss of twelve on 3rd and goal!
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 28, 2010 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions
You don't need to remind me of the injury apocalypse that hit last season...
With Batum missing from the get-go, Oden and Pryz going down, and a gimpy Roy at the end of the season…
I imagine that first game against the Nuggets would have been different had Batum played. Isn’t he perhaps the best man-on-man defender?
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 27, 2010 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Batum has had trouble with Melo
Melo beasts him. Martell did better there due to strength.
by peregrinebrm on Aug 27, 2010 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Melot is probably part of the logic for acquiring Mathews
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
And now Martell is a T-Wolf.
Does that mean Minnesota will sweep Denver? That would be hilarious.
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 27, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
My predictions
Regular season wins: Head to Head vs. Portland:
Portland – 58 N/A
Utah – 53 2-2
Denver – 51 2-2
OKC – 50 1-3
Best of Seven:
vs. Utah……………PDX wins 4-2
vs. Denver……….PDX wins 4-1 (assuming Carmelo got traded)
vs. OKC…………..PDX wins 4-2
vs. Min (lmao)…PDX wins 4-0
When you can tell me whether Melo gets traded or not
(and for who if he does get traded) then I can answer your question. Until then, this is a little premature.
But we’ll assume no trade, for today.
Portland vs. Denver. We played them even down to the wire two years ago. Billups is older, but they have a good backup for him. They abused us with size last year, but I’m assuming the addition of Marcus and reasonable health will combat that. Melo, if still there, will be in a contract year, highly motivated, and their other guys will be looking at him and saying, “This may be our last chance.” If he’s still there, they will be a very dangerous team.
On the other hand, the schedule is not anywhere near as favorable for them this year as it was last year, I’ve been expecting them to implode for three years (Billups has prevented it so far but now it looks like Melo has kicked implosion into overdrive), and they simply don’t have the power to match up to us if we are reasonably healthy (if we aren’t reasonably healthy, this discussion isn’t worth having).
Denver with an untraded Anthony wins a lot of games and could give us a run for the division title, but we should beat them by 2-3 games.
Seven game series — hard to predict. We can’t really stop Melo, and Billups has been there, done that. We should be better than them, but can we come up with a game plan that exploits our advantages more than they will be able to exploit theirs? Home court advantage should help. I’d give us a 60% chance of winning.
Denver without Melo might be better/more dangerous, depending on who they get for him. They still have depth at the big positions, an explosive if inconsistent player in JR Smith, and Billups. If they can get a dependable scorer at SF and another nice player, and no head cases, they will have reduced their “likely to implode” ratio considerably, which is worth something.
Portland vs. Utah. For a couple years, Raja Bell may be about as good for them as Wesley was. He’ll fit nicely in their system. Boozer for Jefferson makes them marginally worse, in my opinion. Okur is out for a while, I believe. They will not be as good as last year. We should finish 5-6 games ahead of them, maybe more. I don’t see their roster as it currently stands getting close to 60 wins or being a major post-season threat.
Playoff series, head to head, I just have three words. Boozer is gone. We should have home court advantage, I don’t see them winning in Portland (again, assuming reasonable health), and I think we’ve got an excellent chance to win a game in Utah as well. Deron Williams can dominate a game, no doubt about that, but I don’t think they have any answer at all on the defensive end for Greg Oden inside, I think Nic effectively negates Kirilenko, I think Aldridge can defend Okur and Oden/Camby/Przybilla (whichever two are healthy) can hold down Jefferson. At worst, our front court should break even against them, and I like our backcourt more, and our bench is better.
Portland vs the “Blunder”. Last year, OKC lost about 0.3 games to injury, while we lost about 3,000, and we matched them with 50 wins. Neither event is likely to happen this year. Durant’s game is rounding out nicely, some of his flaws are going away or at least lessening, and his strengths are getting better. I still think Harden was a great acquisition for them, though most of last year he wasn’t all that consistent. I could see them, even with a few more injury problems this year, getting 50 again. If they are really fortunate on the injury front again, they could win 55, maybe even as many as 57. I don’t see that they really upgraded this year, they are relying on internal development. We added Marcus, which is a bigger/better acquisition, IMO, than they made. We will finish ahead of them, even if they manage to win 57.
Playoff series, we beat these guys. On those occasions when we came to play last year, we beat them. We beat them without Greg or Brandon. We beat them in OKC. They are too dependent on one scorer, and despite some of Nate’s flaws as a coach, there is one thing he is really good at — devising a defensive scheme against teams that are overly dependent on a single scorer. If Durant gets hot, they might steal a game in Portland, but we can win two in OKC for every one they get in Portland.
Wild card — I think they still have cap space, so they could pick up a center in an unbalanced trade, which could alter things by playoff time. But as currently constructed, they don’t beat us.
Odds are, in reality part of the comment above this signature is wrong, but since I know it is right, I'll defend it to the death. Contradict me at your peril. Never believe that having the facts on your side will make a bit of difference.
by jscot on Aug 27, 2010 1:51 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
They don't have much cap space left I think, given that they picked up Mo Peterson's contract to get Aldrich.
Storyteller’s has them at 4mil under the cap.
Also, just wanted to say, glad you’re back and posting again.
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
Good analysis, but...
First of all, it looks like you’re assuming the Blazers would win 60, or close to that. That’s a huge number; typically only 2-3 teams every year get there, and I don’t think the Blazers will be one of them this year. Yes, they won 50 with a backcourt held up by paper clips, but as Dave wrote many times last summer, the jump from 50 to 60 is exceedingly rare, unlike the one from 30 to 40 or 40 to 50.
As for Utah, I would never, ever, discount them. Yes, the matchups are somewhat better from our perspective, especially with Boozer gone, but last year they didn’t just beat us: they shredded us. And they didn’t do it based on talent only: they do it with a system that takes a ton of discipline and determination to defend against. Some of this will be helped by the return of shot-blocking, but I’m still worried.
As I commented below......
…….four of Utah’s top ten players, in terms of minutes played last season, are no longer on their roster, a fifth, Okur, is not expected to be ready to go on opening night. Utah is faced with a lot of turnover, and Sloan’s system is very reliant on precise execution. I think it is reasonable to expect them to struggle a bit coming out of the gate.
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Mediocrity.
I think Utah is in some trouble, AK47 is a big problem, low performance, bad attitude, huge cap hit (deadline casualty?). Losing Mathews, Brewer, and Maynor, for next to nothing? And I’m not sold that Al Jefferson is a winner, but for a couple first round picks, the risk isn’t all that great. As long as Deron Williams is running the team, those picks will never be better than mid-round, and a real post threat you will not find at 17 or 18.
Sloan is great, but there’s too much going on here. I anticipate a step back toward .500 for the Jazz.
by damonrayhymer on Aug 28, 2010 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes the jump from 50-60 is huge
but if you look at it like 54-X-60 it’s much more likely. The injury riddled season (that we actually improved quite a bit just to get 50) is obviously an anomaly.
Portland could coast along with their superior talent and stay right with us. Now that Portland woke up, the hammer cometh down.
Bayless > Daffy Duck after 3 cans of rockstar
by Batumshakalaka on Aug 27, 2010 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Your usual good sense.
A few reactions:
Denver is faced with a lot of distractions. Melo, if he returns, is going to be thinking about getting paid. Billups is slowing down. JR Smith is volatile. Karl, who has been masterful at herding this group of cats, has major health concerns. I could see these guys being as good as they were two years ago, or I could see them completely imploding. Most likely scenario: Denver slightly down from where they were last year. Meanwhile, I think Portland is ready to step up.
Batum and Mathews may not be able to stop Melo, but they can make him work. Having two quality perimeter defenders reduces the impact of foul trouble on either. Nene, Martin, and Birdman who pushed us around last year are not going to dominate the boards against Oden, LMA, and Camby. If Roy is back to being ROY, I give us an edge in a head to head match-up.
Utah is probably going to struggle a little early in the season. Okur isn’t back, Boozer, Korver, Brewer, and Mathews are all gone. Five of there top ten players, in terms of minutes played, are gone or unavailable. It is going to take a while for them to integrate new players and settle on a rotation.
Sloan is a great coach, but he isn’t a miracle worker. A lot of his success has been based on stability. At the moment, Utah is anything but stable. A lot depends on Jefferson, how well will he play? In particular, how well will he defend? How well will he fit next to Milsap, and Okur when he returns? At a minimum, I foresee some initial struggles. I have a hard time seeing these guys winning more than 50.
In a head to head match-up, Sloan seems to have Nate’s number. However, I think this is the year that the Blazers start to overwhelm Utah with size and athleticism.
OKC: I see the Blunder as our primary rivals for the Division crown. They are good and getting better. Durant, Westbrook, Sefolosha, Hardin, and Maynor are about equal to Roy, Miller, Batum, Mathews and Bayless.
Portland still has a significant edge up front. Oden and LMA have an advantage in size, length, and speed against Krstic and Green.
Basically, OKC has two outstanding young stars in KD and Westbrook, and they have a handful of decent role players; but, they don’t match up with the breadth of quality players on the Portland roster.
A lot of things went right in order for OKC to make the huge jump from 23 wins to 50 wins. I think the most likely outcome this season is for the Thunder to consolidate last year’s gains before taking another big step forward. In order to continue to improve, they are going to need to see a lot of individual player development. It isn’t impossible, but I think the most likely scenario is for them to win about as many as they did last year.
In a head to head match-up, I give the Blazers the edge based on depth and breadth of talent. Batum is about as close to a defensive Durant doppleganger as you will find in the league. Miller seems to have enough crafty veteran tricks to keep Westbrook in check, and our big guys should dominate the boards.
Overall, I see it like this:
Blazers: 55-58
OKC: 50-52
Utah: 48-50
Denver: 48-50
This would make the NW Division the toughest Division in the league.
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Here's what a road trip through the NW division looks like to other teams this season.
![]()
by MiledAnimal on Aug 27, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
The other teams are proud masochists fueled by pain, rage and honor?
We are dead. So very very dead.
"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban
Don't worry
I hear they lost a moon or something.
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
As the resident BEdge Thunder fan
I’d say your analysis of the the Thunder is pretty spot on (57 if everything goes right, 49-51 if catch a typical injury slate). I agree that for this year, barring injury, Marcus will help you (much) more than Cole Aldrich will help us. Can’t say you wouldn’t be the favorites in a playoff series, but man I’d be psyched to see that one play out.
One other thing...
I know we were pretty lucky with injuries last year, but I think one should probably consider that this team is probably pretty resilient healthwise. Not to say that we’ll go a whole season losing only 8 man-games again (or whatever it was), but that it’d probably be a pretty safe bet to predict a healthier season for the Thunder than for most teams in the league.
fair enough
you’re right….there’s a lot of luck in injuries, but it’s not ALL luck.
by peregrinebrm on Aug 27, 2010 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Aside from LMA and Andre Miller, OKC does have a more durable set of players than Portland.
I hate to admit that, but it’s the truth.
Thank God that Miller is Westbrook Kryptonite
That matchup and the matchup at center will define the the season series between Portland and OKC.
It really would be terriffic if we had a healthy Oden vs Durant
Those two guys would be the leaders of their teams. In that kind of rivalry everyone is totally motivated, the veterans know THIS is what we have been working/waiting for. Punching and counterpunching, turning it up, going beyond what you have done before. I sure hope so. And, with the possible lockout looming, I personally place a lot of emphasis on getting down to it, all out, this season. You just don’t know about the future.
"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"
You can have more than one...
And, if it’s Greg whose knees hold out, and BRoy’s don’t… you may be surprised…
It would be a heck of a series....
Thanks for the vote of confidence in my evaluation. I think we are going to see an amazing rivalry between these two teams over the next decade. Pop some popcorn and pull up a chair.
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Utah and Denver are starting to show cracks
Denver especially appears ready come completely unglued.
Utah will still be dangerous. Sloan won’t allow them to slip too far too fast.
Okc are the media darlings but they still have a lot of holes in that roster. They also have had not one ounce of adversity. It is bound to happen and they will find out last year was easier than it should have been.
Portland has the most depth and the best supporting cast for Roy. Plus Oden, Batum, Bayless, and now Matthews all have the capability to improve individually.
Matchup wise we have the advantage against all of these teams especially with Oden. OKC and Utan are especailly hopeless to deal with his inside game. Denver isn’t much better off. With the individual defensive improvements…Healthy Oden and Batum,and Camby and Matthews, even a small offensive improvement should lead to a Division title and a substantial increase in wins.
Portland 59-23
Utah 50-32
Okc 48-34
Denver 45-37
I believe his intention was to convert his emotions to a textual format
that is, convert them “to words”.
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
I appreciate the thought austinpwnz...
…but tylercomp was right. Two (2) is what I intended to write. I also believe tylercomp should change his “handle” to Capt. Obvious….lol!
I put the Blazers on top
assuming reasonable health. As was posted above, if they don’t have that, this conversation is irrelevant.
I don’t like Denver because it seems that is a combustible situation. Also, I wonder if Coach Karl’s health has an impact, because it seems like he is the emotional core of that team. I don’t think Anthony is motivated by this being his contract year — he’ll get his money regardless — largely because I think there are certain places he wants to go, and Denver isn’t one of them.
I don’t like Utah because I just think they are a bit thin, and stepped back in the Boozer-Jefferson trade. However, never count out a team with Jerry Sloan at the helm, and I love Deron Williams at the point. I think this is our main competition.
OKC is the media darling, but I think they are about to find out, as Portland did last year, that it is actually harder to make the step from a good team to a very good team than from a mediocre team to a good team. They’ve got talent, but no one is looking past them.
Portland has yet to see its RAMBO lineup. This seems like a very versatile group: if Nate will let them, they should be able to run. With Roy, Miller and Oden, they should be good in the half-court. Batum and Oden give them a defensive presence, and allegedly Roy has committed himself to improving his “d”.
I’m a little concerned about the bench from an offensive perspective: Bayless is really the only scorer there, unless Babbitt plays well enough to earn minutes. (I’m assuming Rudy is gone.) But defensively they should be solid with Matthews, Camby, Pendergraph & Cunningham. I rather suspect we won’t see a lot of 1st unit, 2nd unit nonsense this season. Instead, Nate will combine bench guys and starters throughout most of the game.
All other things being equal, I see the Blazers topping 55 wins this year, and I don’t see anyone else in the division doing that.
Who knows what Denver end up will looking like, but Utah presents some interesting matchups.
PG – obviously DW is better, but how much better than Andre plays this year could go a long ways towards who wins the division and a potential playoff series. If Andre can continue to play just a notch below the premier PGs, Blazers should be in good shape.
SG- Big Blazer advantage. Is their starter as good as our backup? Utah would have preferred WM over Bell. Dana has the injury history, of course Roy
by 52therim on Aug 27, 2010 6:18 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
accidental premature posting
Raja has the injury history (of course Roy hasn’t been the image of health. Utah has very little depth there. Unless Roy is somehow limited, this is the big edge between the teams.
by 52therim on Aug 27, 2010 6:22 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Utah-Portland positional analysis (continued)
SF- this is a bit of a toss up. Obviously you’d prefer to have Batum, with his upside and rookie contract over Kirilenko and his baggage, but does Batum actually give the team a lot more than AK gives Utah on the floor? Edge to Batum as he’s a more efficient offensive player, but let’s hope this becomes a bigger edge by playoff time.
PF- Should be edge LMA due to his physical tools, but a toss-up because of Millsap’s energy and heart. I’d love to see LaMarcus take it as a personal challenge to out play Millsap.
C- Oden/Canny/Pryz vs Jefferson/Plural means offensive advantage to Utah and defensive advantage to Portland… big defensive advantage
What say you? I’m sure there are other thoughts on the positional battles with Utah.
by 52therim on Aug 27, 2010 6:36 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Our bench is better
but their coaching and system are much better. BIG advantage
OJ Mayo is the Blazers' PG of the Future
by GreatOden'sRaven on Aug 27, 2010 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions
PS
I forgot to add that Batum has a grudge against Utah for trying to end his season early by banging on his bad shoulder. Batum doesn’t forget. Advantage—Portland
hg
I think Brewer grabbed Nic by the arm
but Carlos put him up to it
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Williams is the biggest avantage for Utah
But BRoy can counter with a big advantage to Portland.
sounds exciting big edge goes to Portland
hg
Premature posting?
Isn’t there medication for that? ;-)
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions
you should just be glad you can still "post" at all
Is that what the kids are calling it, these days?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Utah
Portland
Denver
in that order
but I think we get farther in the playoffs than the Jazz
OJ Mayo is the Blazers' PG of the Future
by GreatOden'sRaven on Aug 27, 2010 7:37 AM PDT reply actions
Utah has had a huge amount of roster turnover
As I pointed out above, 4 of their top ten players in terms of minutes played last season are gone. A 5th, Okur, isn’t going to be ready on opening night. Don’t you think this is going to slow the Jazz early in the season? Particularly, given that Sloan’s system is all about precise execution?
by upper left corner on Aug 27, 2010 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Not only roster turnover
but basically the loss of their bench. They have a really nice starting 5 and an incoming #9 pick, but they have no depth. I think they stand to play well but lose a lot of close games.
Oh man, Gordon Hayward is so overrated due to his NCAA performance
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
Portland must get better.
Winning the division is a consolation prize, barely worth discussion. What year is it?
This is an interesting year, the first year in a while where major Western forces aren’t gathering against them. Really, the only team that seems bent on domination is LA. Portland has made small changes on the fringe, but is otherwise hoping GO will be the difference maker, along w/ the further development of Roy, Batum, & Aldridge.
Denver has imploded. Utah has shown it’s fiscal limitations. San Antonio is living in the past. OKC lacks the front line to go much further forward. Houston could be a huge surprise, though, depending on Yao.
Portland and LA, the question is one of health and good fortune.
winning the division guarantees a 3rd seed or higher
with at least two rounds of home court advantage. Winning the division is not only worth discussion – it is the primary discussion.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 27, 2010 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions
I hate it when we're the fourth seed.
We always seem to play a fifth seed who would have been the two seed except for an injury problem that hurt their seeding but from which they are fully recovered by the time the playoffs start.
This season, I want the second seed.
At least.
by MiledAnimal on Aug 27, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Whoa WHAT!
I may be a little out of line here… but I thought the Timberwolves were our rivals – AND WE ARE TEARING IT UP!!!
I would just like to see the Blazers win a game in Utah and Denver....
It’s seems for the past several years every time they go into those arenas they get their butts handed to them. But I think we all know that the Blazers are going to be better than Utah and Denver this year because both of those teams got a little worse (or in Denvers case a lot worse once they trade anthony). OKC is relying on player development and Blazers are relying on health. But I think our rivals for the next few years will be OKC…definitely.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Truth.
Road wins in Utah and Denver are hard to come by. A few of those would be indicative of good things ahead.
I don’t know about OKC, though.
by damonrayhymer on Aug 27, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions
OKC
Also rely to much on Durant as we sometimes do on BRoy, but with the return of Greg a healthy Batum and good role players we should have the advantage.
It was said that Durant had to improve his shooting that he partrayed in the USA – France game in the first half. But then look at who was guarding him in the first half—Batum and Batum will only get better, then we can put Camby on him (snicker)
Nevertheless, we will have to use all our players, not just the pick and pop or BRoy ISO.
If we utilize all our players, stay healthy, and play hard, the sky is the limit.
hg
I think the top 4 teams hold their home courts and head-to-head is pretty close.
The best road team wins the division, which should be Portland because of frontcourt depth.
SHOULD BE.
Rich Rolled
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Aug 27, 2010 8:50 AM PDT reply actions
Western Conf. if you assume all teams are healthy (not going to happen)
1) L.A. 64-18 (experience & cohesiveness)
2)Portland 62-20 ( Domination on the boards & depth)
3)Dallas 58-24 (Only age keeps them below 60)
4)Houston 57-25(The great wall)
5)O.K.C. 54-28(Durant=MVP)
6)Utah 50-32 (Jerry Sloan)
7)San Antonio 49-33(Last gasp of a great champion)
8)Memphis 48-34(surprise,surprise,surprise!!!!)
Denver Implodes 45-37
Somebody step up! - Mike Rice
Divisions don't mean much.
The way the rules are, teams in your division are almost the same as teams in your conference. Division rivalry is just for fun. Just pointing that out.
(Very slightly more games against them per year on average, a very very small chance of the seeding rules changing anything significantly.)
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
Disagree.
First, it’s one of the goals you give your team, and this one you put on the Must Do List.
If you DON’T win the division, the best you can do is 4th.
Thinking about anything LESS than a division title is not going to put your team in the right frame of mind to win a title.
3rd actually
And it doesn’t affect home court advantage, just seeding.
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
OKC
Of the four teams, Oklahoma City is the only one who comes into the season without any major concerns. The Roster is basically the same, they added one big body in the draft, they are the NBA’s new darling. I see OKC improving on last year by three or four games.
The other three teams have big question marks. Portland with injuries, Utah with roster change, and Denver’s got all sorts of issues – the health of their coach, the distraction of Melo’s contract, Billup’s aging.
The nice thing is that Denver and Utah need to overcome their challenges just to stay even. If the Blazers stay healthy, they have a much bigger upside – even more than OKC.
Portland – 56 wins. Oden makes it through the year.
OKC – 53 wins. Continued improvement.
Utah – 49 wins. Just don’t like the Jefferson move, but Sloan will get them to over achieve
Denver – 48 wins. I see an implosion coming.
It all comes downt to health
These four teams (assuming no Melo trade) are hard to distinguish on paper. No one would be surprised to see any of them atop the division at the end of the year and no one would be surprised to see any of them finish 4th. It’s all going to come down to health and chemistry. The team that has the fewest key injuries is likely to win the division. I hope that turns out to be the Blazers, but it could just as easily be any of the other three teams. The Blazers certainly have the talent to win it, but so do OKC, Denver, and Utah.
In terms of health, on the one hand, the Blazers almost surely have more roster depth than the others, and they’ve demonstrated an ability to win in the face of a plague of injuries. Thus, I would rank Portland as the team best positioned to survive key injuries and remain competitive. That said, I would also probably rank Portland as the team most likely to suffer key injuries. Oden, Roy, Przybilla, Camby, and Batum, all strike me as having a higher than average risk of injury — given their history.
Utah is probably second on that list with Al Jefferson, Kirelenko, and Okur all being problematic. Conversely, given Sloan’s system, I would also rank Utah as being more likely to survive key injuries than OKC or Denver.
OKC and Denver are different story. Their key players strike me as being less injury prone, but if they do suffer key injuries, those teams strike me as being more likely to completely derail. A signficant injury to Durant or Westbrook would be devastating to OKC’s changes. Likewise a key injury to Melo or Billups (or a trade obviously) would be devastating to Denver.
www.ripcitydispatch.com
Portland should be the best in the division
Utah – lost Wes Matthews, Kyle Korver, Carlos Boozer, and Mehmet Okur is coming off a pretty bad injury. Al Jefferson is a solid player, but I don’t think he will make up for the loss of 3 rotation players and an injury to a 4th. They’ll still be good, but I don’t see them being able to hang with a healthy Blazers squad, especially in the paint
Denver – KMart and Birdman are still sounding like they are dealing with the injuries that effected them last year. JR Smith is still being volatile (and they’re trying to move him), and Melo sounds like he’s going to be parting ways with them eventually. For the sake of this argument, given he is still there, the Nuggets will still be pretty good with Billups/Lawson at the point and Nene inside, but their cap situation has resulted in a thin bench and an even thinner font line. They are a playoff team, but they have regressed from the last season or two.
OKC – not much to say that isn’t already out there – Durant looks to be an MVP candidate, Westbrook looks good, and other guys like Harden and Sefolosha will be back. They’re perimeter is solid, but their inside players are still pretty weak, even with bringing in Cole Aldrich.
by rip_city_swagger on Aug 27, 2010 10:00 AM PDT reply actions
Deadlock
I feel like I don’t know this Portland team at all and I’m not sure they know themselves. We had issues meshing together at the start of last season and never really got going due to injuries. The whole season seemed pretty awkward with the Blazers never being consistent (how could they?). Also, I have no idea how Oden will play. I love the big guy, but he has a lot of question marks entering this season. So….IF Oden plays up to his defensive and rebounding potential, IF Joel comes back, IF Roy and Andre start the season on the same page….
The Blazers have the potential to win the division….or place 4th. I think there will be less then oh…say 3 games that separate Utah, Denver, OKC and Portland. My best guess with all the IFs working out:
Blazers
OKC
UTAH
Denver – And the team is exploded at the end of the season (or maybe during the season) with Melo being traded or just leaving at the end of the season.
You're absolutely right
They didn’t mesh the first half of last year, and it’s going to be a whole new puzzle to solve in the first half of next year. At least we know Miller is the #1 point guard and we know what he can do, but are we confident that he and Roy fit in the same system? Fitting in Oden, for the third time, rewrites the playbook. There’s a lot of coaching to be done.
On the positive side, we can look forward to a healthy Roy and Batum from the start, so the team will have all its pieces in place in a way they never were last year.
worst case scenario vs. best case scenario vs. likely scenario
Worst:
OKC (some internal development leads to a one or two win improvement)
Portland (injuries lead to status quo)
Denver (Melo stays but doesn’t mail it in)
Utah
Minnesota
Best:
Portland (60 wins = top seed in the West)
OKC
Utah
Denver (Melo is gone – ’nuff said)
Minnesota
Most likely:
Portland (55 – 60 wins = 1st or 2nd seed in the West)
OKC: (49-50 wins – 50 wins is harder than it looks and no one will be looking past OKC this year)
Utah (lost too much)
Denver (rebuilding year)
Minny (’nuff said)
Bottom line: NW Division stays strong at the top but loses a lot in the middle with the Denver and Utah situations.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
Look, with a healthy team
I expect the Blazers to win the Western Conference, surprising only those who doubted Greg Oden’s body’s ability to stay healthy.
"I come to you now, at the turn of the tide." -- Brandon "Gandalf" Roy, April 24th, 2010
Too many wins projected for all teams
in the division.
Personnel issues in denver, front line depth in Utah, front line issues in OKC, Portland is health (Utah too—Okur).
Whoever gets healthier quickest or gets a good to great front line will win the division.
If the division winner only won 49 games I wouldn’t be surprised.
I think the Blazers have been preparing the faithful for the news that Oden might not be available for the start of the season—Blake Griffin took nearly a year and that won’t be the case for Oden until the end of November.
I agree
Total wins predictions of 55-60+ are a little too optimistic. Many teams outside our division have improved. The East has gotten remarkably better in the summer. Roster additions for Dallas, NOLA, GS, and Fakers make them stronger. Wolves will be better and Rockets will experience addition by subtraction. Clippers and Rockets will like us prove tougher to beat with healthier rosters. OKC will improve (but not by much) by standing pat with a young maturing roster. The significant drop off in total wins come from Phoenix and Utah due to roster turnover, SA with an aging core, and trade rumors and leadership instability will get the better of Denver..
Taking all that into account, you also have to consider that even with a healthy roster it will take some time for our deep and talented roster to really click, as they haven’t played together consistently enough. We have question marks about our tactical game plan including our big man rotation and style of play.
I would be very happy with 54 wins and anything above 4th seed in the west. Although we have as good a chance of winning the Northwest, division titles really don’t mean much especially when two of it’s perennial powerhouses (Denver and Utah) are getting worse and the large majority in the west is getting better.
by LMA on Aug 28, 2010 3:19 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
NEWSFLASH--Portland is the only team in the NW
Geographers finally stop David Stern long enough to make him look at a map and see that no other NW division team is really in the NW. A marginal case might be made for Salt Lake City, except when Alaska is included as part of the USA. It turns out only 5 states make up the Northwest of the USA: Alaska, Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana. Somehow league offices got confused as in which states Minnesota, Oklahomoa City, Denver and Salt Lake City reside.
correction (as any good reporter should admit)
This cite http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/SD3127/ lists a spot in South Dakota as the center of the US, while Lebanon, Kansas is the center of the contigous USA (Welcome to the NW Denver and SaltLake City). Whereas if you ask Yahoo they say no one really knows fore sure:
Monday January 22, 2001
Dear Yahoo!:
Where is the geographical center of the United States?
Not Centered
Dear Not:
As we learned while reading an archived newsletter from the Center for Land Use Interpretation, there are several answers to your question:
The geographical center of the lower 48 states lies outside of Lebanon, Kansas, in the middle of a hog farm.
The geographical center of all 50 states is located 17 miles west of Castle Rock, South Dakota.
The geodetic center of the U.S. is found approximately 42 miles south of Lebanon, Kansas. (Note: A geodetic survey makes corrections to account for the curvature of the Earth.)
The article is quick to point out, however, that none of the designated “centers” are truly precise or objectively determined:
Many variables exist when calculating the center of a land mass as large as the United States, and selective criteria and methods can be used, from the selection of different map projections, to defining the periphery of the shape with varying degrees of accuracy.
In fact, scientists at the Geodetic Survey have stopped calculating “centers” due to the imprecise nature of the task. Oscar S. Adams, Senior Mathematician for the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, even wrote, “Since there is no definite way to locate such a point, it would be best to ignore it entirely….”
Let's do it by population
Take the average position of every person inside US borders. I’ll write an iPhone app to calculate it.
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
In-division roadies just got a lot easier.
And I predict we win the division easily now.
by MiledAnimal on Aug 27, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
tom in in portland:
If portland is Healthy u think they can make the west finals i do becaues they got size for lakers and a Healthy Greg oden the sky is the limt so the lakers need to not sleep on them and the whole NBA
Yannis Koutroupis:
When healthy I’ll take the Lakers two big men over Portland’s every day of the week. It’s rare that both are healthy, but Oden’s problems surpass Bynum’s at this point and Drew has a higher ceiling. As good as Portland is, I see Utah, San Antonio, or Dallas giving the Lakers more trouble.
Read more NBA news and insight: http://www.hoopsworld.com/Chat.asp?CHAT_TOPICS_ID=1126#ixzz0xqNnFlt0
Portland should be in front...
…If we are hit a little bit less hard by injuries this year.
I don’t think Denver will do very well with the differing issues with Anthony and J.R. Smith and with their top five players on expiring contracts.
I don’t think Oklahoma City will be as lucky next year as they were this year. I think Jefferson is better than Boozer for Utah, but not a better fit. I doubt that Hayward and Bell will fill Matthew’s and Korver’s shoes. Minnesota is a ways away.
That leaves us!
This isn't even a discussion.
Utah lost Boozer, who was the anchor of that team. Jefferson will take time to integrate
Denver is in turmoil and Melo is all but gone. I’d be surprised if they even made the playoffs.
Portland players missed a combined 300 something games last year, I think, and they still made the 7th seed. Even if the injury bug bites again, it can’t be as bad as last year.
OKC is the only threat, but they’re still 2-3 years away from being a true contender.
I’m fairly confident that the Blazers will take the 2nd seed this year.
"If you have a debate with a scholar, you can win. If you have a debate with an ignorant person, you will definitely lose."
"The NBA Apocalypse has occurred, and it's our fault."- C.A. Clark
"I don’t always celebrate, but when I do, it’s when the Lakers win championships. Stay thirsty my friends." - gen!e
Blazers will take it, but it won't be easy
Nugs just hired Masai Ujiri.. Given 4 expiring contracts and a superstar who doesn’t want to play for you anymore, I expect Masai to be busy, and the Nugs to be too busy integrating new people to win enough games to contend… Without Melo, they will be easy picking for some team, if they make the payoffs… I see them taking one big step back this year, and be right back in 2 years.
Utah will find it hard to get a new team to jell early in the year, but I wouldn’t want to face them in the playoffs. They should also not win enough early (injuries, new players) to be able to contend….
OKC is the one to look out for. Need to take care of them at home, for sure. I predict whoever wins the game against them on April Fool’s Day will take the division… US!
I’m thinking a bit more radically in the W/L than most:
PDX 55-27
OKC 53-29
Utah 47-35
Den 46-36
Minn 19-63
Toughest division in the Association, even with Minny…
BLAZERS NUMBER 1 IN THE NORTHWEST AND NUMBER 2 IN THE WEST!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now with both utah, denver, and phoenix falling apart and the spurs getting old, that only leaves LA and possibly….maybe…Dallas.
Dallas has to get more/better production out of Kidd.
Maybe it’s just me, but I was thoroughly disappointed with how he played. Of course, I am NOT a Mavs fan, but he didn’t really stand out.
Maybe Dirk Nowitski did so awesome he totally crowded out Kidd. Maybe not. But Tony Parker maybe be on a downswing, and the Mavs might find themselves badly in need of a young guard at some point in the future…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
Manning drops back to pass, Comedic.Sans and Wilfork come flying in and SACK him for a loss of twelve on 3rd and goal!
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 27, 2010 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions
True, but...
as long as Oden lives up to his potential and stays out of trouble we win that matchup fosho!!
Minnesota Timberwolves
4 free wins for the Lakers since the beginning of time end of the KG era…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
For all the crap we give Wil Wheaton, he can still tackle better than Asante Samuel...
Manning drops back to pass, Comedic.Sans and Wilfork come flying in and SACK him for a loss of twelve on 3rd and goal!
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 28, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Denver last.
Of the three teams, turmoil and injuries has placed Denver at the bottom. If Oden can play 70 games or more, Blazers should be better than Utah. If not, Utah has the edge, even with their lack of depth. I love the Blazers, but from reading this thread, I have to say that there is way too much Homerism going on, expectations are unrealistic.
by stevecolterssocks on Aug 29, 2010 3:06 AM PDT reply actions

by 



















