Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl XLVI: Eli Manning And The Meaning Of 'Elite'

Greg Oden: What Does He Need to Be?

In case you missed it, on Saturday Ben posted an exclusive interview with the man everybody wants to hear from nowadays, Greg Oden.  You can share your thoughts on the interview and Greg's outlook in the near future in that post.  Once you're done with that, come back here and talk about this for a minute.  

What does Greg Oden need to be in order for the Blazers to be successful in the long run?

Obviously you'll need to define terms, namely what long-term success means.  To me it's a championship but maybe you have other ideas.  Once you've established the bar for Portland's future, talk about how much you need from Greg in order to get there.  If you're feeling sprightly you might want to include your assessment of his chances to produce at your required level.

The conversation is open...

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com) 

Comment 231 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If the goal is a championship

Greg needs to be an all-star (indication that he is a successful scorer/rebounder in big minutes), perennial DPOY contender and take LA’s mantle as 2nd option of offense.

Without a healthy and productive Greg we have a hole in our championship plans that simply cannot be patched over.

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 22, 2010 11:15 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

great post

and I like how the emphasis was on GO and not ROY.

It will be interesting to see where this thing GO’s

 :-)

by inpresence on Aug 23, 2010 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

GO makes the world go 'round.

I’m not, however, buying the OKC hype. They’ve got three very nice pieces (no better than Roy, Frenchy, and LMA), a few slightly above average pieces (no better than Camby, Miller, Joel, and Rex), some prospects (no better than Wesley, Armon, and crew), and huge holes on their front line. They are, at best, what we are, when we’re w/out Greg.

With a healthy Oden, Portland is #2 in the WC, developing, waiting for LA’s inevitable fall.

by damonrayhymer on Aug 23, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Until Sam Presti trades Jeff Green for a better fit alongside Kevin Durant, I'm going to hold my ...

judgement regarding the future of the OKC Thunder. As it stands right now, though, the Thunder are nothing more than an above average team that won’t get past the second round in the playoffs.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with you that the Blazers are closer than the Thunder, but.....

…..they are one All-Star big man from being in the conversation. Durant and Westbrook are likely to terrorize the league for the next decade.

by upper left corner on Aug 23, 2010 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Moving Jeff Green for a better fit at power forward -- even if it's someone who's thought ...

of a lesser overall player like, oh, Jason Thompson — would much better complement Kevin Durant. Letting Nenad Krstic walk — or maybe moving him this summer for a tough, rugged rebounder and shot blocker such as Marcin Gortat — would make a huge difference inside, as could Cole Aldrich developing into a poor man’s Andrew Bogut over the next few seasons.

Indeed, a frontline rotation composed of Gortat, Thompson, Aldrich, Nick Collison, and Serge Ibaka — with Byron Mullens and D.J. White as third-stringers — could help compensate for Durant’s poor on-ball perimeter defense; furthermore, they’d be a crew of guys who wouldn’t take many touches away from him on offense.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Moving Jeff Green for somebody who doesn't suck

would much better complement Kevin Durant. Green is a below-average NBA player.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree that Jeff Green sucks, but that's not the national sentiment among fans ...

who lack a in-depth knowledge of advanced statistical metrics. As a result, Green’s trade value most likely exceedes his on-court value; thus, Sam Presti should be able to move him for a beneficial return.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes but

there aren’t a lot of All-Star big men out there. This is why I get annoyed at the Durant-Oden debate. It isn’t about which of those two are better, it’s about which position is more easily replaced. Count the number of great centers in the league right now. If you went higher than one, you must have counted someone twice. There are some very good centers, but not many. If you have a guy that has a legitimate chance at being very good to great at that position, you have to get him.

by hercher on Aug 23, 2010 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

well, Yao and Dwight are the two really

Bogut is very good, Gasol is a very good post player (but not necessarily more of a C than a PF).

Anyway I agree.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Aug 23, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Duh.

But many have no clue, so I am pleased you once again stated the obvious.

30 GM’s are rarely wrong, not simultaneously.

by damonrayhymer on Aug 23, 2010 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

As it stands right now, though, the Thunder are nothing more than an above average team that won’t get past the second round in the playoffs

They’re better coached, especially re: team defense. Portland has the advantage of having better interior defenders (if two of Greg, Marcus and Joel can stay healthy)

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

This point you make,

should not be minimized, as interior defense is a linchpin of many a championship team.

by damonrayhymer on Aug 23, 2010 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

and depth is a good thing

Once Kendrick Perkins went down in game 6 of the finals, the rebounding advantage (and the series) shifted to L*A

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

You hit the nail on the head, ULC. I couldn't've said it better myself regarding Greg Oden and the ...

Portland Trail Blazers dim, yet not completely dark shot at winning a championship in the next five years.

Oh, on a side note, I finally got around to replying to a comment of yours in an earlier main page thread.

http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/8/17/1627881/why-the-blazers-will-do-well-part#45007436

It pretty much says I expect Jerryd Bayless to up his game statistically next season, albeit in the mold of Louis Williams — who performed better than Bayless in PER, TS%, eFG%, 3PT%, and AST% at a lower USG% last season, with only the ability to draw fouls and age in Jay-Bay’s favor — yet, that improvement won’t change how his dribble-drive game is a poor stylistic fit alongside Brandon Roy in the backcourt.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&p1=bayleje01&y1=2010&p2=willilo02&y2=2010

Regardless of the Bayless chatter, though, it’s Oden — and only Oden — who’ll make or break the Trail Blazers as potentially legit championship contenders in the near future. For better or worse, this team’s title dreams rests squarely on his broad shoulders.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bayless might fair

better if he could cut down the lane and get a pass from either Oden or Aldridge from the post. Bayless’s speed and strength are underutilized.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am excited

to see what Rex’s third year brings. This is not his make a make or break year as an NBA player, but I think his future as a PG should become clear this season.
He has a future as a 6th man, scorer, no doubt. His status as a play-maker, well, the truth should manifest itself plainly.

by damonrayhymer on Aug 23, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a great post

Completely agree with the analysis, Oden is the key to this team’s championship future. This line also sums up the current state of Bl;azer fans, imo:

Count me as an optimistic pessimist.

Well said

James, Wade, and Bosh = the Nazgul. Once they were great kings, until their greed got the best of them in their lust for the ring.

by blazeraddict on Aug 23, 2010 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

i recc'd this BUT...

i still hate you. ☠ . Just kidding…. yeah?…. maybe. ✌

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Aug 23, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

if oden can emerge as an artis gilmore type, the blazers will win many games

we need 70+ games from him. if he could avg 12 and 12 with 2 blocks playing 32+ min per, the blazers should be no worse than second best in the west.

by utahcoyote on Aug 23, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I hope my concerns about Nate are misplaced...

I am concerned that we take too long to upgrade.
The thing is, unlike players, we don’t have the restrictions on “trading up” – it is way more do-able than some player upgrade, plus I am quite happy with our players.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Aug 23, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I hope I'm wrong too...

Nate definitely deserves a lot of credit for what he has accomplished here in Portland. The team had shown significant and consistent regular season improvement up until the injury tsunami hit last year. Given the injuries and playing without a legitimate center for two months, last years record was truly impressive.

I think Nate probably “deserves” one more year to show what he can do. Let’s hope that the team stays healthy and we get a proper chance to see how he measures up as a coach of an elite team. I hope that Nate’s hiring of the new assistants is an indication that he is willing to rethink some of his approach…..

by upper left corner on Aug 24, 2010 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like it all... except for the OKC part...

The Thunder do not scare me. The series against the Lakers last year didn’t show me or prove to me anything. Honestly, they aren’t anything until they prove it over and over again… which is the same standard that our Blazers are held to.

by Portland Dynasty on Aug 23, 2010 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jeez, expand on my point and you get 14 recs vs. my 1 ; )

Seriously dude, great post and I totally agree on most points.

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 24, 2010 3:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, man I'm the guy who gave you the rec.

Sorry, for stealing the limelight. It is nice to agree with you so thoroughly on such a major issue.

Given that I thought your post was so insightful, perhaps I should reexamine my views about a certain PG’s future prospects…… ……or then again, perhaps you should reexamine yours …… just kidding ;-)

by upper left corner on Aug 24, 2010 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't have a clue who you might be talking about ; )

Perhaps we can both just agree that we hope he will succeed. I’m happy with that if you are!

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 24, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice and wise post.

If only the Blazer team can actually read this.
Sounds kinda gloomy, yet optimistic at the same time. Let’s hope that everyone steps up.

by Hopman27 on Aug 29, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Needs to be an all-star"?

I question that assumption, namely because all-stars are picked for their stats, not always for their contributions to winning games. Yes, the very best NBA centers have been all-stars. But there have been some very serviceable ones who rebounded, played great defense, and scored enough to keep the defense honest, yet never were on an all-star team.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

I also question your related assumption: that GO needs to be the Blazers' #2 offensive option

How many recent champions have had a high-scoring center? Without going to the stats…the Kobe/Shaq Lakers are the only team that comes to mind. Going back further, the Rockets with Hakeem were an example (though it’s questionable that team would have won if Jordan hadn’t been off playing baseball). Then, going back even further, perhaps the Magic/Kareem Lakers were an example.

But certainly championship teams with high-scoring centers have been in the minority in recent decades. The Blazers don’t need a big-scoring center to contend. They just need a great defender & rebounder who scores enough to keep the defense honest. Even at last year’s level of development, GO fit that bill.

The guy just needs to stay healthy and to cut down on his fouls a bit. And re/ the latter, referees tend to lighten up once a player has been in the league awhile. Mysteriously, what was once a foul no longer is deemed to be one.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, I didn't forget Gasol, or Duncan either

While both those guys log some minutes at the five, they’re technically fours. And the Blazers already have a long, high-scoring four in LMA. What they need is a rebounding, shotblocking terror to complement LMA, and they have that in GO—when he’s healthy and not in foul trouble, that is.

In other words, contrary to what many Blazer fans apparently believe, Greg Oden needn’t become a high-scoring all-star center for the team to contend for—and eventually win—championships.

Yes, LMA isn’t as good as Gasol or Duncan. But GO is much better than the guys who have played opposite Gasol or Duncan. And—more importantly—LMA’s game should thrive alongside GO, as Bill Walton’s did alongside the more physical Maurice Lucas back in the day.

As GO and LMA finally get a chance to log serious minutes together, they should become as formidable a twin towers combo as we have in the league. That particular partnership and chemistry is what KP envisioned when he picked GO in the first place. He said so.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're way overvaluing LaMarcus Aldridge here, as well as underestimating the impact ...

that upper crust 5/4 type post players like Tim Duncan and Pau Gasol have on their teams.

Aldridge is a relatively inefficient scorer, has poor handles — which is why he lacks a dribble-drive game from the elbow up high and the baseline down the side (i.e., unlike Chris Bosh) — can’t pass his way out of double teams well (i.e., unlike Gasol), lacks three-point range on his shot (i.e., unlike Dirk Nowitzki), is a fairly weak man-to-man low-post defender (i.e., unlike Duncan), is a lazy weakside help defender (i.e., unlike Kevin Garnett), and isn’t aggressive on offense at setting hard picks and rolling to the basket for easy buckets (i.e., unlike Amar’e Stoudemire).

I hate to harsh here, but Aldridge is basically a taller, younger version of David West. That’s not a player who can be counted on as a #2 option for anything more than a second-round playoff team, though, and there’s no way a team can realistically contend for a championship with Aldridge as one of its major focal points. Right now, there’s only two potential franchise cornerstones currently on the Portland Trail Blazers: Brandon Roy & Greg Oden.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

All those players do indeed exceed LMA's capabilities in the areas you cite

But he exceeds each of THEM in at least one area. For instance, he runs far better than Duncan or Gasol EVER have (or Garnett currently does), he defends better than Stoudemire does, etc.

Another consideration: LMA is younger than each and every one of those guys and has not finished maturing physically. Granted, eventually the “potential” label wears off, but for at least this last off-season, I think it’s fair to say we haven’t seen the best LMA has to offer. E.g., reportedly he’s worked hard with Bayno on his face-up, dribble drive to the hoop (ala Chris Bosh).

Conclusion: I think YOU’RE way undervaluing LaMarcus here—as well as underestimating the synergy that his game will possess in combo with Greg Oden’s once the two finally get to play a full season together.

Hopefully, we’ll learn which of us is right by the conclusion of ‘10-’11. I.e., hopefully both guys will be healthy this season. I think there’s one point we can agree on, AK.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I should have mentioned...

One thing I think LMA already does better than any of the 4/5’s you cite—with the possible exception of Garnett in his prime—is guard smaller players out on the perimeter. Granted, LMA gets stuck helping on those guys much more often than I’d like to see. But presumably that’s a flaw in Nate’s schemes, not LMA’s game.

Once isolated against a smaller player in the smaller player’s realm (the perimeter), LMA’s anticipation & footwork is remarkable for a 6-11 athlete. On many occasions, I’ve seen smaller players—even point guards—shake & bake only to find they haven’t rid themselves of LMA. Sometimes they’re so startled they travel or throw the ball away.

The grass is always greener. Yes, LMA’s lack of a physical presence down low can be frustrating. Far too often he fades away instead of forcing contact and scoring or getting to the line. But the guy has some special qualities—qualities that will be more apparent when he’s playing alongside a healthy, more-mature Greg Oden. (Knock on wood.)

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

isolated against a smaller player in the smaller player’s realm (the perimeter), LMA’s anticipation & footwork is remarkable for a 6-11 athlete.

This is true, which is why in the past (Millsap toxic offer week) I’ve advocated LMA playing 5-6 minutes in the middle of each half at the 3, mainly against reserve SFs.

This idea may need to be revisited once Greg, Marcus and Joel are all healthy. Just imagine a LMA-Camby-Oden front line!

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

zones can be defeated with savvy interior passing

the kind that I’ve seen Marcus and Greg display, in the past

LMA, not so much. But he would be the floor spreader in this scenario

We’re talking about a limited-minute scenario, when the matchups are favorable. It’s certainly not a “main-course” lineup. If the opposing coach wants to game plan against the Blazers big front court, that just gives him something else to think about

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

The ball has to get into the interior first against a zone, while my ...

guess is that Brandon Roy would try to be superman in those cases by either shooting over the top — with his three-point efficiency not exactly a great asset — or driving to the hoop with reckless abandon hoping to get a foul call when the defense collapses in on him.

by AK1984 on Aug 24, 2010 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

pass it to Camby at the FT line area

and let him exploit the gaps in the defense with his passing skills. Somebody is still going to try to front Oden when he dives into the dotted line area, whether the defense is in a zone or mtm

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 25, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

This isn't about some hackneyed tripe like "[t]he grasses is always grenner" ...

and other cliched nonsense; instead, my argument here is that Aldridge isn’t as skilled — nor has the ability to harness this alleged potential — as you’re hyping him out to be here. In fact, Aldridge is a hindrance to Greg Oden’s development in my viewpoint.

Forget the fact that Aldridge is on par with another overrated player, David West, as well as is nowhere near the upper tier of 4s in the NBA — and it’s not even close — on the contrary, my claim is that Oden should become the #2 option on offense as soon as he returns to the court. Yeah, immediately.

So, if Oden is healthy, the Portland Trail Blazers would be better off pairing him with a low usage, defensive-minded 4 alongside him on the frontline — which is why I advocate trading for Anderson Varejao, who’d be perfect in that role — and quit relying on an inefficient jump shooter with poor handles and listless defense (i.e., LMA) as a supposed core player.

LMA Isn’t a franchise cornerstone, nor is he a superstar or even a star. Nope, he’s a slightly above average player who doesn’t make anyone around him better in the process. While LMA isn’t quite the black hole that Zach Randolph was during his time in Portland, it’s pretty darn close to being a similar set of circumstances.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

You put me in the unusual position of arguing against GO's skill level

Usually I’m the one pointing out how talented GO is and how great his potential is. But in this case I have to question your view that GO has the goods to be the Blazers’ #2 offensive option. Or that he NEEDS to play that role on the team.

GO is no Shaq or Hakeem. He’s not going to score 25 to 30 ppg. He DOES have excellent hands, a nice (so far underutilized) little jumper, and the power needed to demand double-teams once he gets the ball down low. Once his teammates figure out how open he is rolling to the hoop after setting picks, he should pick up a couple more dunks per game. But team GO with an Anderson Varejao, and you have a front line that clogs up the middle and lacks the scoring punch needed to take pressure off the perimeter players (Roy in particular). To be most effective, GO needs to be paired with a four who can open up the middle by hitting outside shots. Yes: a four like LMA.

Really, both your LMA bashing and GO boosting are over the top to me, AK. Yes, LMA has been disappointing in some respects, and yes, GO is a much better player than inobservant fans realize. But I think you’re getting carried away on both counts.

Then again, most people think I’m getting carried away when I project Nic Batum as the next Scotty Pippen (with a better outside shot). So to each his own…

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 24, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is definitely taking it a bit far

I’m in favour of giving LA and Oden a season together and re-evaluating next off-season, hopefully with the advantage of having seen LA play next to a true low-post center as was envisioned. If he shows no sign of fitting in that role then he can be shipped out along with Nate ‘Lipservice’ McMillan

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 24, 2010 4:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also, despite being a massive Greg Oden fan

I have some reservations about thrusting him into a high usage role too early. Is is naive to think that his offensive efficiency wouldn’t take a hit if he was being given the ball in similar sets to LA (fed the ball in a post-iso situation). Although I like Greg’s ability to pass from the low post, LA was not entirely useless in this regard and also is currently more adept at protecting the ball.

To be frank, I’d be in favour of a more balanced set up in terms of offensive responsibility between GO and LA, at least until Greg is more comfortable receiving and protecting the ball in post-up situations. At that point, LA can become a lower usage outlet option of take a hike.

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 24, 2010 4:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like the idea of GO on offense.

It’s what happens when GO actually attempts to score that makes me cringe. It seems like an awkward fit and a huge effort for him. He looks clumsy and unsure. It appears to tire him.

He’s the opposite on defense. He’s most comfortable blocking shots and rebounding. He feels powerful. He gets to scowl.

Still, we need him to be a legitimate threat to score, and he can do it. I’m positive he will transform into that threat if he can stay just healthy for a couple of seasons.

by MiledAnimal on Aug 24, 2010 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Jordan's bulls

relied on a multiple center approach which was serviceable in terms of scoring and rebounding and had the added side effect of being able to foul regularly without impacting center play on the bulls. Until center depth was established and Jackson arrived with a plan to utilize that depth (triangle) Jordan and the bulls were like the thunder.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Absolutely agree with you.

I’ve been saying this for the last two years: No Oden, no rings. As for the question of what he needs to be, I think he needs to be a top 5 rebounder, a top 5 shot blocker and as you said, a “DPOY” candidate. He averaged 11 ppg in 24 minutes per game last year so I would expect to eventually see him play 30-35 minutes per game and give the blazers a dominant lost post presence that can score 15-18 ppg. If he can stay on the floor for 30+ minutes it isn’t far fetched to think that he can give the blazers that.

by JAWKS on Aug 23, 2010 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

A God-like force that stuns the enemy into a stupor of inability with his mere presence alone.
And by that I mean: reach his full potential.

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 22, 2010 11:23 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Oden needs to be:

1) Mentally connected to his teammates (because he has been playing with them so little this is step one to success)

2) A defensive force that alters other teams game plans (If healthy, he is this already, but he must remain so if we are to reach championship level)

3) A rebounding machine with enough of an offensive presence to free up LaMarcus to move more and play to his substantial strengths (I am not an Aldridge hater like more and more Blazers fans I see, but he is who he is, and he will be far more effective next to a 15-10 Oden than a 3 and 12 Pryzbilla or an 8 and 8 Camby. If Oden averages 15-10 and dominates defensively on the inside, I see Aldridge freed up to be a 20-10 guy which he almost is already and both he and Batum freed to be creative and more aggressive on defense)

by yubaduck on Aug 22, 2010 11:24 PM PDT reply actions  

You beat me to it. Healthy and upright. That’s all I ask.

by JonathanPDX on Aug 22, 2010 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ditto

If he’s healthy then he’ll get where he needs to be….no doubt.

by CougzRule on Aug 22, 2010 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

darn, I was hoping to be the one to post that single word

and yet I couldn’t agree with this more. Thank you sir llamaiguana (nice name too).

rec’d

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Aug 23, 2010 12:13 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

yes, he has already shown us play when he was healthy,

which, with inevitable progress with playing time, will make him a game changing force which puts the rest of the team in contention. And I believe Greg fits with the rest of out team, both as a player and a personality, so that the team will be tight and effective.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Aug 23, 2010 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

How do you think he's being misutilized?

Leaving aside the team-wide propensity for switches, which is a big reason why he keeps picking up those ticky-tack fouls.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Basically everything we're going for LA, needs to be done for Greg

We should be spending the early parts of the halves feeding Greg instead of trying to get Aldridge going. He needs to receive the ball on the low block multiple times a game. Even with the offensive fouls, he is still incredibly effective there, and effectively unguardable 1 on 1 with his size and strength and ability to find guys when he’s double teamed (as opposed to LaMarcus, who would often be forced away from the basket and dump it back to halfcourt when a second defender would come at him.

And of course, a greater emphasis needs to be put on getting Greg the ball when he’s moving, too., pick and rolls, down screens, etc. Greg’s hands are one of his greatest assets, and we’re wasting it by not getting him in positions to make a quick, slightly more difficult catch that leads to an easier bucket instead of solely forcing him to create for himself (yeah, I know I just talked about getting him the ball on the block, too).

Basically, we need to adjust our offense to stop treating Greg as just a better Joel. Asking our center to stand outside the lane and crash the offensive glass makes sense when your center has no discernible offensive skill other than rebounding and setting screens, but it’s a criminal waste of a talented player. People like to joke about how it would be a waste to have drafted Durant because Nate would just have him stand in the corner and shoot threes as the SF in our offense, but that’s basically what’s happening with Greg here. We’re taking a guy capable of so much more and shoehorning him into a minor offensive role because that’s what the offense calls for the center to do. That needs to change.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Perhaps my recollections are mistaken

But I remember that through the first twenty games of last year, we did precisely what you laid out in your first point. Greg became a focal point of the offense in the low post and there was much hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth about whether or not he was ready to assume that role and if it was upsetting the dynamic of the team. And I also remember that we didn’t do NEARLY enough of your second point — though I’d blame that on the fact that no other big on our team competently runs the pick and roll, so our guard weren’t used to it, and also on the fact that Miller wasn’t playing nearly as much as he should have been.

At least for last season, before Greg went down, I don’t remember us using him as a just a better Joel. If I’m recalling incorrectly then I couldn’t agree with your whole post more. He will be one of the most efficient players in the NBA and we simply have to take advantage of that.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

As I recall, there was some effort

which lasted roughly a week before Brandon and Greg complained to Nate about being out of rhythm, and Greg basically went back to being Joel++. This was somewhat illustrated by Quick’s defense of Nate after a mini-controversy at BE about Ben charting Greg’s touches in the opener and wondering if he was involved enough (i.e. were we calling enough plays for Greg?) with Quick writing an article quoting Nate about how he had called like 5 of the first 20 plays of the game for Greg, etc., etc.

Of course, I think a key stat that supports my idea that Greg wasn’t involved in the offense enough is that 41% of his attempts last year came with fewer than 10 seconds on the shot clock. Given that Greg wasn’t exactly racing down the floor that much, I’d hypothesize that most of these attempts are the result of putbacks on offensive boards after the clock has been reset. This ratio is similar to our other centers who had very little involvement in the set offense: Joel (47%) and Camby (50%) and very different from the players who were our primary offensive options: Aldridge (25%), Roy (24%), and Miller (31%). I’d imagine you could obtain more definitive data off synergy, but sadly, I don’t have a subscription.

I’ll admit I was overstating a little bit saying we used him exactly like Joel, but his role was far too similar to Joel’s than it should have been.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

That's an awesome stat that you dug up.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sadly, it's not very applicable universally

since it isn’t pace-adjusted. Looking at the Lakers you have Gasol and Bynum at 37% and 40% respectively, which would seem to indicate something similar, but the fact is that the Lakers play a much faster pace than us with more than 5 more poss/game than we have, so there will simply be more of their shots taken with less time on the shot clock, as evidenced by the fact that their primary offensive option, Kobe, took 38% of his shots with under 10 seconds on the clock.

So really, you’d need to either look at raw data that says how many of these buckets actually came off putbacks instead of just shots early in the clock, or else do some sort of pace-adjustment if you wanted to compare players from different teams.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, I went to look at Pau Gasol's numbers on this stat when Mike Fratello ...

was head coach of the Memphis Grizzlies and Yao Ming’s numbers on this stat when Jeff Van Gundy was head coach of the Houston Rockets, but soon realized that they’re slow-paced offensive schemes would indeed affect the percentages.

But yeah, it’d be nice to have an advanced stat that charted usage with relation to set plays called for a guy.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Really interesting thought though and good follow-up.

Recs for effort.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

We should be spending the early parts of the halves feeding Greg instead of trying to get Aldridge going. He needs to receive the ball on the low block multiple times a game.

This was my point in the “LMA 6th man thread” Once Greg is up to speed health-wise, I expect a usage conflict between the two big men early in each half. While it’s a nice problem to have, the coaches and Miller are going to have to work out how many touches Oden and Aldrige receive earlky on so they will remain “in the game” mentally. LMA can spread the floor for Greg, not so much the other way around…that’s why I suggested starting Camby at the 4 and bringing LMA in off the bench, as a possible workaround

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see touches being a problem for these guys

if the offense is designed for them to play off each other. They will both get their touches, and can provide opportunities for each other. What Camby can do is teach these guys how to recognize opportunities, and how to take advantage of them.

by hercher on Aug 23, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Touches were a problem, early last year

Hopefully that will be resolved by offensive system adjustments, and with Andre in the starting lineup from day 1

Roy doesn’t usually look to score early in games, in the past the focus has been on getting LMA touches and establishing an “inside” game (or, at least turnaround jumpers from the left side) With a healthy Greg in the game, there’s a potential for a real inside game to be right at the rim, on every possession.

The main reason I want to see Oden start as soon as he is able to play is because Miller is the starting PG, and ‘Dre is Portland’s best post-entry passer (especially via lobs). I’d also like to see Camby on the floor with #52 as much as possible, because Marcus is a superior high post passing big man (and I have my doubts re: LMA in this area)

Add it all up, and the easiest way to ensire this trio is on the floor together at the same time is to start them. Then figure out a rotation where LMA’s minutes won’t be significantly reduced, where he can receive his customary 15 shots per game and feast on reserve defenders when Roy/Oden are on the bench, resting

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

6th man

Do you think Lamar Odom is “inferior” even though he rarely starts?

I doubt it will happen, but it’s a role where the Blazers will need a consistent scoring punch

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Odom makes half of Pau's salary and a third of Kobe's.

LaMarcus makes, what, 80% or more of Brandon’s pay? Plus he’s been groomed for his current role since the day he arrived.

If the team asked LaMarcus to play off the bench, before long he’d be seeing Rudy’s reflection in the mirror.

by MiledAnimal on Aug 23, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Depends

Let’s say they start the season with LMA and Greg in the starting lineup. After a couple of weeks, LMA is only getting 10 shots a night instead of the 15 he has been receiving for the last 3 years. So he goes into Nate’s office and ask “what gives, I thought I was option 2?” McMillian tells him that Greg is getting it done, and there’s only so many touches to go around, etc. Then Nate drops the 6th man idea on him. Do you think LMA is going to turn his nose up at it, then? Especially if Nate sells it to him as the chance to be the volume scorer for the 2nd unit and “it will be for the good of the team”?

There are ways that old school coaches can make players feel good about accepting this kind of role, without making it sound like a demotion. If LMA wants to make a statement about his unselfish team-first attitude and raise his scoring average in hopes of making an all-star game, this could be his meal ticket

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lamar Odom, however, is a marvelously skilled player, especially when it ...

comes to his keen court vision for a big guy and superb passing ability. Odom is also a hugely underrated defender — particularly considering his versatility — and rebounder, as well as has three-point range on his shot; he does this with a low usage percentage (i.e., sub-20%), too.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

once again, I'm not comparing players AK

I using Odom as an example of how a 6th man can be a valuable asset for a championship-caliber team. Not everybody here remembers Red Auerbach, Frank Ramsey, John Havlicek or even Kevin McHale’s early years.

but they do know what Lamar has done in L*A

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lamar Odom makes the players around him better, while LMA's ...

game is more suited to benefiting only himself. That’s why Odom is an awesome fit in the sixth man role, while it’d likely be an abject failure if it was attempted with LMA.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

On a side note, the modern-day John Havlicek has been doing his ...

thing for the past several years. His name, of course, is Manu Ginobili.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

So we see, well-coached teams employ the 6th man

Again, I don’t expect LMA to come off the bench. I’m just pointing out the potential benefits of the idea

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've been thinking about it,

and it is a terrific idea, except that Lamar had been on two teams previously, and had already experienced the highs and lows of the NBA experience. He had been through a couple contracts, and finally found himself w/ a coach he could trust. Still, it was not an easy transition.

Really, I like the idea, but I’m not sure LaMarcus is ready.

by damonrayhymer on Aug 23, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oden could screen for

Aldridge when Aldridge makes his across the lane move. If Oden’s man tries to cover Aldridge then Oden can put Aldridge’s man on his back and that would leave a lane open for a pass to Oden.

So, initiate the offense by having Miller and Aldridge race up the floor and if an easy basket doesn’t present itself then Aldridge can post up. By that time Oden should’ve arrived and he can immediately screen for Aldridge who can then make his move across the lane or return the pass to Miller who can then pass the ball back into the post now occupied by Oden.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Amen

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 23, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

(Meta) Everyone that posted "Healthy" here gets a rec

Sometimes you can’t be first.

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Aug 23, 2010 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

For a championship, at the very least he would have to be on the level of a Kendrick Perkins for Boston

And as obviously as healthy, playing 70 to 80 games over multiple seasons. Perkins gets injured in the finals against LA, and Boston’s championship repeat goes out the window.

Ideally he would be better, reaching All-Star level multiple times. And if healthy and on the court without too much foul trouble (around 2000 minutes, i.e. about 25 to 30 minutes per game) he would very likely be better than a player like Perkins with the rebounding and scoring efficiency that he showed. But that’s the absolute basic need to be considered a competent center on a championship team.

If he’s not healthy enough to do that (and soon, since Roy is really entering his prime years), the team would have to look at an adequate replacement that is younger than Camby. Not a superstar, but a player with the quality of say a Marc Gasol or Emeka Okafor who is able to make things happen on both ends of the floor and can still play at that level for a couple of years. Drafting someone like that might still be possible too, but that would really risk the championship window. So proven help from wherever in or out of the league would be needed.

As an aside: With how the game gets officiated at the moment, I’m not sure we’ll see a super dominant center any time soon. Dwight Howard is the closest thing to it at least on the defensive end, but even he as a very mobile big man gets whistled for contact very often. Refs haven’t seen a dominant big posting up since young Shaq was around. So he sits on the bench in foul trouble, while the athletic wings like Kobe, James, Wade, Durant & Co. stand at the foul line. It will also be interesting to see how Houston performs this season in this regard, a team that seems designed to get opposing teams in foul trouble with Yao and Kevin Martin. And, no duh, Miami of course.

"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban

by Norsktroll on Aug 22, 2010 11:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Playing All-Star level

I would not call that a prerequisite. Greg could be the best center in the NBA, but playing for the wrong team may stop multiple All-Star appearance.

Of course his playing time is essential to the teams usage of him. I feel if this can happen then the coaching staff would start utilizing his strength more. As you said on the floor for 15-30 minutes would give the rest of the offense the knowledge that he is a big factor on offense as well as defense. Because of foul trouble and injury problem the offense has adjusted to not having him, therefore it is hard to alternate back and forth and still keep the flow of the game going.

Of course, the guards will say they can do it better themselves, but we know different. With more playing time they will learn to use his assets.

hg

by BBK on Aug 23, 2010 3:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kendrick Perkins?

Greg bested that last year in his short stint with a missmash lineup. Greg is A LOT better than perkins.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Aug 23, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Greg playing 60-70 games at 25-30 minutes

Is better than practically every Center in the game not named Dwight!

by Odenrising on Aug 23, 2010 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

At the time I would compare his to Dwight

Dwight can’t make free throws or little jumpers, I know Greg missed a few little jumpers, but believe me he can make them.

hg

by BBK on Aug 23, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes to the capability to be better

But he has to learn to play the game with all its nuances and tricks first.

by Odenrising on Aug 23, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sold

| #11 | #7 | #9 | #15 | #52 |

by MadBlaze on Aug 22, 2010 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

green

Odds are, in reality part of the comment above this signature is wrong, but since I know it is right, I'll defend it to the death. Contradict me at your peril. Never believe that having the facts on your side will make a bit of difference.

by jscot on Aug 23, 2010 4:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

this is one of the funniest things I can remember reading on BE.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nice

Although I’ll be happy when GO simply takes his already-disrespectful treatment of His Royal Highness (LeBron James) to the next level. This time, instead of merely failing to move out of the way of The Self-Annointed One as he runs upcourt, I hope GO picks up His Pretentiousness and deposits him atop the backboard.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 24, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Greg Oden

Geriatric Dunk Squad!
1/4/10 - Juwan Howard dunks on Chris Kaman.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTkOqDgLb6s
3/7/10 - Andre Miller Tomahawk jams on the Denver Nuggets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-JVgm7F1QA
4/12/10 - Marcus Camby drops 30 and 13 on OKC to cement 50 wins. http://www.nba.com/blazers/media/camby_chant_041310.mp3

by Eat Politicians on Aug 22, 2010 11:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Can’t argue with that.

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 23, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Facts are facts.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

What does Greg Oden need to be in order for the Blazers to be successful in the long run?

Playing

success means: Next five years – 3 WCF, 2 FInals, 1 Championship

Greg will need to average playing 65 games per year. Be on the roster in 4 out of the 5 playoffs years. Average 30 minutes, 14 points, 12 rebounds, 4 offensive, 2.5 blocks, 4 fouls, 2 assists.

The quality of his production when Greg has played gives me great confidence that he could obtain these figures, and I think I’m aiming low. His injury record has to introduce some element of lowered probability, even though I don’t want to believe any of that. You never know the impact of the other players on his numbers – Bayless feeding him in the post and P&R could boost his scoring, or Batum and LMA could benefit from all the doubles on Oden, actually lowering his averages while still creating an impact. I like their chances; 82% probability, 7% standard deviation.

Almost forgot the All-Star appearances: 4

Greg Oden is the BlazersEdge!

by Sashland on Aug 22, 2010 11:54 PM PDT reply actions  

15+ ppg, 11+ rbg, 2.5+ bpg playing 70+ games next year and 4 of the next 5 years

At a PER of 23 playing 30 minutes a night over a healthy season, Greg will get these numbers. This team is then one of the two best in the west and one of the top five in the league. He is an all-star. He stays healthy, the Blazers championship window is WIDE open.

That is what I want from Greg Oden.

I need him to bring it strong and stay a Blazer.

In KP I trusted!

by LaoTzu on Aug 23, 2010 12:00 AM PDT reply actions  

If Greg Oden can stay relatively healthy, cut down on the foul trouble, and sees the coaching staff up ...

his usage — which I doubt with that dullard Nate McMillan at the helm — then he should put up 17 points on 60% shooting, 12 rebounds, and 3 blocks per game if he gets an average of 30 minutes of action a contest.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&p1=odengr01&y1=2010&p2=gilmoar01&y2=1975

So, if Oden stays injury free and properly used as the team’s #2 option on offense, then he could very well put up Artis Gilmore esque numbers — although the expectation regarding per-game stats would need to be altered due to the difference in playing time and pace — but I’m wary about that. Even if Oden plays in 65 to 75 games next season, I doubt McMillan has the basketball acumen to know he must make the big guy a focal point on offense — as well as not have him switch up on the perimeter so often defensively, which is a leading cause of his foul trouble — and, moreover, inform the inefficient LMA that he has to take a backseat behind the phenom pivotman.

I, however, fear that McMillan, Brandon Roy, and their love of LMA will hinder Oden like it did at the beginning of last season. Perhaps that makes me a pessimist, but I deem it being a realist. A dismayed, discouraged realist at that.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wish I can disagree with this.

I will run naked through the streets if Oden wins the MVP this season...happily.

by xedubx on Aug 23, 2010 2:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I share your concern, but I think there is hope....

1) As Oden emerges as a low post threat, and as Batum solidifies his reputation as a legitimate threat from 3, it is going to become increasingly difficult for teams to double LMA. LMA is not inefficient when he when he is covered one on one.

2) If Bayno’s report about LMA’s off season work actually shows up on the floor in October, LMA is going to become more efficient this coming season. If he develops a bit more of a low post game and gets to the line a couple of more times per game, his TS% is almost certain to improve.

3) As LMA’s efficiency improves, he is going to need fewer shots to post his typical 18-8, which should leave more shots for GO.

The bottom line is that having more offensive options should lead to increased efficiency and reduced susceptibility to double teams for everybody.

by upper left corner on Aug 23, 2010 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'll believe Bayno's reports about LMA's offseason work when I actually see it.

LaMarcus is not exactly renowned for his commitment to getting better in the offseason, at least if his stagnation over the last two years have any bearing on the matter.

I’d add to your list that Greg getting healthy will do wonders for our paint defense, which means more blocked shots and gambles by our perimeter players to force turnovers, which means we get to RUN RUN RUN till Nate takes the tempo awaaaaay. To use an economic concept, it’s not a zero-sum game. If everybody is worried about getting their numbers and touches, then let’s expand the freakin’ pie, and that means getting out in transition whenever possible. Greg being back will make that way easier.

Whether Nate is the coach to implement these changes remains to be seen. I’ve defended him because I think he’s done a great job overcoming adversity to this point, and without Greg we’re not a championship-caliber roster so championship-level expectations are misplaced. If the big fella is healthy this year and we’re still seeing a plodding offensive attack with limited transition opportunities and not forcing turnovers defensively, count me in on the coaching change bandwagon.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Changing the pace won't have any affect on the usage rate of players, so I'm not quite sure ...

where you’re going with that. In fact, I prefer an extremely slow-paced, down-tempo offense — albeit a more power-oriented one that more effectively utilizes the pick-and-roll and post-up sets for the center down on the low block — hence, I’d target JVG first and foremost as head coach, with Mike Fratello as my second choice.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

It won't affect the usage rate

but it WILL effect how much total usage everybody gets. More possessions at the same usage rate for all equals more shots for all. That comment is in regard to any concerns people have about LMA and Roy not getting enough touches.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

It'll affect the amount of touches and possessions, but that doesn't matter. If LMA ...

continues to be relatively inefficient in comparison to Greg Oden, then #12’s usage rate needs to drop dramatically. I, too, doubt you’ll get a happy Brandon Roy flying recklessly up and down the floor in a heedless up-tempo, run-and-gun offense — nor will Oden be at his most effective, for set plays in the half-court are a way better option than him trying to keep up with everyone in transition — thus, I’d take that into account.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

But a more up-tempo system will fundamentally change LMA's efficiency.

He’s one of the best PFs in the league, in my opinion, at getting out in transition, catching with soft hands and finishing in the open court. More up-tempo play equals fewer LMA fadeaways and thus higher LMA efficiency.

We’ll have to agree to disagree for now on Greg’s ability to run the floor — I think he’s perfectly capable of blocking a shot or grabbing a board on the defensive end and then throwing down as the trailer on a secondary fast break. Given that we haven’t really seen enough of him to know one way or another, we’ll just have to wait to find out.

Just to be clear I’m not advocating Phoenix Suns basketball. I think with the stable of athletes we have, we should be trying to do a better job of running on turnovers and long misses. Miller is brilliant as a full-court passer, and Nic, Bayless, LMA, and Matthews (from what I’ve read about him) are all great in transition. We need to get easier looks than the mid-range jump shots of which the Blazers are so fond and I think “defense into offense” is the easiest way to make that happen. Fundamentally I still want the Blazers to be a methodical half-court team.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

LMA in transition is a serious positional advantage

most PF’s can’t stay with him – and those that can stay with him aren’t big enough to prevent a layup or dunk.

Every time he is in the game – it should be option #1 – easy baskets based on LMA’s capabilities in transition.

While that will help his efficiency – fewer 20’ jump shots in the half-court game will help even more.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Aug 23, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matthews (from what I’ve read about him) are all great in transition.

go to youtube and type in “Wesley Matthews highlights” and you’ll see plenty of #23 leaking out in transition last year, with the Jazz. Very dynamic finisher

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matthews comes from a system

where two man basketball was a must ( like a give and go) and that’s where I think Matthews, on offense anyway, is going to help the most.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wes Matthews wasn't a part of the Jazz's two-man game, for in Jerry ...

Sloan’s system that’s between the 1 and the 4. For wing players in Utah, they tend to thrive there due to the off ball movement, flex sets from the ol’-fashioned UCLA high-post offense, constant motion in the half-court, and opportunity to leak out in transition from time to time.

http://hooptactics.net/freesite/offstrategies/setoffense/ucla.php

That won’t be the case with him on the Portland Trail Blazers, for the 2 is a ballside wing who scores heavily in 1-4 iso sets — which isn’t in Matthews arsenal, since he’s got poor handles and sucks at creating for himself — thus, on offense he’s purely a 3 here as a weakside cornerman launching long-distance bombs from beyond the arc like Martell Webster.

Quite frankly, I argue whichever front office personnel member(s) targeted Matthews, thought he’d be a good fit under Nate McMillan, and decided to overpay him for his services did a terrible job in my opinion.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

But will Matthews have permission to leak out.

I think Martel had the same physical skills as Matthews but he didn’t seem to be comfortable going to the basket.

Again it’s the style of play. I don’t think running out after a missed shot is what the blazer management got him for. I think it’s because of the system Sloan runs and Matthews will help the blazer’s because of that kind of experience.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

not on a missed shot, on a deflection.

Watch the video and you’ll see what I mean

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

and I think the Blazers got WM for his perimeter defense

and 3pt shooting ability

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Frankly,

I think that Martel has more upside from a physical ability point of view than Matthews. Martel just needs to play more. If he gets some playing time and a scheme that allows him to develop his game I could see him back in a blazer uniform.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Meh, they're both fatally flawed 3s with piss-poor handles.

I pity Martell Webster, too, because he’s going to get exposed trying to play the 2 in the Triangle offense. Man, the Minnesota T’wolves are a joke.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Could you see Webster ever starting for a playoff team?

I can’t, and Matthews already has. For Jerry Sloan

Check back in 12 months, after a year of watching Wesley I think you’ll come away saying “Martell…who?”

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You need to account for how Jerry Sloan gets more out ...

of wings due to the UCLA high post offense being his base set. With Portland, Wes Matthews’ flaws will be exposed on offense. Y’all can just wait and see for yourselves, though.

by AK1984 on Aug 23, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've seen enough of Matthews game

to know I’m not going to have buyer’s remorse

Perfect wing for Nate. always defends, shoots the 3, not content with his past success

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt

Wesley tells the story that his mom would force him to defend the highest-rated player on every youth team, and yell at him from the stands to keep his focus and intensity, regardless of the score

Even though his dad played in the NBA, Matthews was never a “can’t miss” prospect; he scrapped at every level to get where he’s at. The money is not going to change this kid, he’ll accept whatever challenge Nate throws at him and never back down

Wesley was upset that the L*kers swept the Jazz, even though Utah was badly outgunned with Okur missing. I like these kinds of players, Matthews would be a good guy to have in a foxhole

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

He'll be so-so at the 3 -- as was Martell Webster, ...

who’s no great shakes — but Wes Matthews won’t be able to play the 2 here. Unlike in Utah, the wing positions aren’t interchangable due to the offensive scheme here.

by AK1984 on Aug 24, 2010 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unlike in Utah, the wing positions aren’t interchangable due to the offensive scheme here.

That’s not what I’ve heard. The 2-3 are interchangeable in Portalnd’s offense. Unless the SG is #7. The other guy is a corner floor spreader. I’m looking forward to seeing what kind backcourt duo Bayless and Matthews make, I suspect Jerryd will crash and Wesley will move in behind him and spot up

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 25, 2010 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

In Seattle, Rashard Lewis and Ray Allen ...

weren’t interchangable. It’s a system thing.

by AK1984 on Aug 27, 2010 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

while i like idea of deliberate offense utilizing screen rolls,

there is also an intriguing ability to run both high and low post sets when camby and oden are on the court together. camby is a very underrated passer, and exceptional at entry passes to lane. this has the potential of getting 4-8 dunks/layups per game off of back cuts. we need to see off the ball movement and limited isolations.

that said this is a team that has the wings to run when given opportunity. miller a great long passer and i visualize many oden to miller to batum/mathews/aldridge (if he runs) fast breaks.

by utahcoyote on Aug 23, 2010 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Everyone around the Blazer organization says every summer

that LMA is working out like crazy, he’s working on serious skillz that are going to wow us in the winter, he looks like a new man, etc. Still have yet to see it happen.

by howlingfantods on Aug 23, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, exactly.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Feeding Oden the ball in the post 10-15 times a game

would increase the pace. Pace is not a good measure of much: it’s highly influenced by shooting %.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Being Healthy is a far gone conclusion

Greg just needs to stay healthy, get experience and learn to play his game according to the refs.

Other then that, just continue where he left off last year, Go out and have fun, play as hard as possible, Push back limitation with practice,playing up to his potential and good coaching

hg

by BBK on Aug 23, 2010 1:41 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree.

Just keep doing what he was doing last year before he got hurt. We don’t need him to be Shaq2.0, just be Oden. When healthy, that’ll be good enough for a championship.

by blazer_tk on Aug 23, 2010 1:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

He needs to be a force on the boards, a defensive monster in the paint, and be a leader. Everyone on the team

needs to be able to see Greg is confident and is going to do his part by blocking any shot around the rim.

by BRoyInThe4th on Aug 23, 2010 2:40 AM PDT reply actions  

To play his true position

A fast-breaking Point Guard.

You know, that or all the well-reasoned stuff about health, foul trouble, confidence and fit within a championship-caliber offensive system.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Aug 23, 2010 3:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Greg needs

To crush his enemies, see them drive before him and to hear the lamentation of their women.

by odenator69 on Aug 23, 2010 3:12 AM PDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Consistent defense and rebounding

Success means perennial contenders (legit contenders) for the championship. The best team doesn’t always win the championship, but success for this team would constitute being good enough that no one laughs when someone picks them to win it all. We should be legitimate contenders with a real shot at winning it all at least four times over the next six or seven years.

For us to do that, Greg needs to provide the kind of defensive and rebounding impact that we’ve seen in the past, but for 65-70 games a year (or more) and for 30 mpg or more (which will necessitate not only better health but fewer fouls). Fouls per 36 minutes have to drop below 5, and below 4 would be better.

If we are to be a truly dominant team, making the Finals 4 or more times in the next 7 years and winning at least twice, we probably need Greg to play at an All-Star level (whether he makes the silly game or not), providing a real offensive threat which is used well, in addition to the defensive and rebounding contributions. This one is harder to tell, though — we still don’t know what LMA and Nic are going to provide, or what kind of contributions we’ll get from the PG spot. If all of those go as well as they could, it may be we’ll never need more than rebounding and defense from Greg. We should get more from him than that, though, whether we need it or not.

Odds are, in reality part of the comment above this signature is wrong, but since I know it is right, I'll defend it to the death. Contradict me at your peril. Never believe that having the facts on your side will make a bit of difference.

by jscot on Aug 23, 2010 4:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Disagree.

If he needs to be careful, he won’t be worth much to the team.

"I come to you now, at the turn of the tide." -- Brandon "Gandalf" Roy, April 24th, 2010

by RedUniInLA on Aug 23, 2010 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

A presence on the court

Besides growing as a player, a full season of development between him and the team. Ascend the skill ladder and win games together.

The 2012-13 NBA season: a dynasty begins.

by OVERTIME on Aug 23, 2010 5:19 AM PDT reply actions  

To have a solid shot to win a title, we probably need him to, at a minimum, be healthy for the playoffs and average 35+ mpg playing at least as well as he did in short minutes last season.

by jksnake99 on Aug 23, 2010 5:22 AM PDT reply actions  

all that he can be.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Aug 23, 2010 5:34 AM PDT reply actions  

You want to send him to the ARMY?

"I come to you now, at the turn of the tide." -- Brandon "Gandalf" Roy, April 24th, 2010

by RedUniInLA on Aug 23, 2010 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

A lot of questions in this post.

To start with, long-term success for the Blazers means, over the next 5-8 years, at least one championship, multiple trips to the finals, consistent trips to the conference finals.

They don’t get there without Oden. He need not be an all-star, but he needs to be close. I’m thinking about 15+ ppg, 12+ rpg, 3+ bpg. He needs to average 70 games a year, and be available for the playoffs every year.

Numbers are a funny thing: we’ve seen guys put up 15 points that don’t seem to matter. Greg’s numbers need to matter. He has to be a real force inside, someone who allows the perimeter defenders to get up on their man because they know they have a shot blocker behind them. He has to be someone that will allow other guys to play their games knowing that the opposing center rotates to them only at his peril. As much as I like Joel Przybilla, he isn’t that threat.

Can he do it? Yes, I believe he can, but I think we will get a definitive answer this year.

by hercher on Aug 23, 2010 6:02 AM PDT reply actions  

I like your point about Greg's points mattering

I think they will. He should be able to average 15 points a game in 30 minutes exclusively on offensive rebound putbacks and wrecking the other team on pick and rolls. While I’d love to see Greg’s fledgling post game more often, for at least the first part of the season I’d rather see him produce in ways that won’t put so much of the spotlight on him.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

"It was bad reffing...but not rip apart the fabric of time bad." -- The Arkitect, Game 79 Blazers versus Mavericks Post-Game Thread

by BlazersOrBust on Aug 23, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

I really started thinking about points mattering watching Camby

during one game last season. I think he only scored about 10 points, but it seemed like every basket accomplished something — it stopped a run by the other team, it came with the clock running down, it converted a turnover into points, it broke a tie, something like that.

Then you compare that with a guy who scores 25 points, but for a losing team. Dominique Wilkins was that way – he scored a ton, but it never seemed to accomplish anything.

by hercher on Aug 23, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

What Does He Need to Be?

A member of the Portland Trailblazers.

"I got something special with Hedo because that's the first guy who kicked my ass last year," said Batum. "You can't do that again. I play against him in the summer too, France and Turkey. Boris (Diaw) wants to guard him, I say ‘No no, I got it. I got it.'" --Nic Batum

"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum

by tking503 on Aug 23, 2010 6:03 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

we dont need all that people are saying we need from him

but averaging around a double-double in at least 25 min/game of work for around 60 games/year and healthy for the playoffs 4/ 5 years and be a DPOY candidate every year with winning it twice over his career. We don’t need him to become the #2 offensive option, just be enough of an option so opposing centers wouldn’t think of trying to go cover/double LaMarcus with the constant threat of Greg dunking it… averaging 2 blocks per game would be very nice too, which he has shown he could do. If he can change the way other teams play us, that will likely be enough of a change for us to win a championship with the rest of the players we have in place and the natural progression of LMA (a lil), Batum (a lot), Matthews (a decent amount), Roy (a tiny bit), Bayless (decent amount), and a slight improvement in surrounding talent.

by avalancheman on Aug 23, 2010 6:11 AM PDT reply actions  

33.4 7.8 15.8 .496 0.0 0.1 .333 4.6 6.9 .670 3.1 8.0 11.1 2.7 0.7 2.6 1.9 2.2 20.3

MP FG FGA FG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
33.4 9.4 15.8 .596 6.0 6.9 .870 4.1 9.0 13.1 2.9 0.9 2.9 1.4 3.2 24.9

The greatest player since Chamberlin. honestly, to beat the super friends, GO has to become an NBA icon of MJ, Russell, Bird, Magic, Erving, the logo proportions. If we don’t see much progression from LA, BRoy, Batum etc. I understand the healthy, double double, DPOY arguments, but to take home multiple rings he has to become a superstar. That said, I will be overjoyed with a healthy Oden who grabs every board and gets 3 + blocks a night. It’ll at least feel familiar, ie the Drexler teams who would have negated MJ’s carreer with a mid 20’s Sabonis, what the ‘77 team could have been if healthy. I love this team, but we’re not a Boston or LA, we’re not even a Miami. That’s to say we’re not a destination. Now going completely on a tangent, my biggest regret is how we let expiring contracts expire here. People fall in love with Portland when they come here. Channing is certainly the most recent example. But, look at all the “ambassadors” we’ve had over the years. I don’t think their lining up for this job due to some fantastic relationship with Paul Allen. Besides the PG debate, besides the question of how good can GO get, the Blazers have to take a risk. I feel like I have been sitting at a blackjack table since 1988 as a fan. Get up big (NBA finals) down and almost out (NO, not the jailblazers, but the Otis Thorpe, Chris Dudley, Harvey Grant teams) but always trolling along. Some fans liken this team to an addiction. In this metaphor, obviously a gambling addiction. We’re at the point where we need to bet it all. We lose, seek counseling. We win, well then we’re that upper echelon team. That team where you don’t call it an addiction, but rather a religion.

The stat line is just a ridiculous extrapelation/guesstimation on one of the years Tim Duncan was injured for about 20 games.

wanderlust

by gatajohn on Aug 23, 2010 6:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Greg needs to stay on the court.

Not another season ending knee injury. No more foul trouble. Stop getting the ball stripped from his hands when he does a post up move.

by BootStrapper on Aug 23, 2010 6:45 AM PDT reply actions  

He needs to hold the ball at chest height, and keep the ball close to his body with his elbows out.

Watch Shaq for an example of what to do.

I'm a Greg Oden honk, yeah.

Even when I was still a Sonic fan, I liked Oden more than Kevin Durant.

by AK1984 on Jun 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT

by Tyler Durrden on Aug 23, 2010 12:26 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Stay on the court

That means health and fouls. We’ve speculated way too much about Oden’s potential by examining his per minute stats. It’s time we see the production in a consistent 30+ mpg.

Blazers basketball? Just basketball you say? More like a way of life

by dyshooter182 on Aug 23, 2010 7:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Health really is the only question mark

even with the small amount of opportunity to adjust and improve at the NBA level Greg has already shown himself to be a dominant presence. His teammates and coach will have no choice but to utilize him more if he can play a whole season. The real question in my mind is whether or not he will surpass Brandon as the best player on this team.
      ….and how will Brandon handle it if it happens. SHOULD be a great season. GO stats this year 14/11/3. We pass the L#kers this year.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Aug 23, 2010 8:21 AM PDT reply actions  

30-36 MPG, 65+ games year, 14/12/3 pts/reb/blks

With that line he should be a perennial all-star and be the anchor we need. Anything else is gravy and will only help us win more rings.

/////
((o))
/////

by Dep H on Aug 23, 2010 8:24 AM PDT reply actions  

games, games, games

can he play 70 regular season games and 25 playoff games a year for the next decade?? If so, he will fulfill all of the other criteria.

by shallwemaui on Aug 23, 2010 8:26 AM PDT reply actions  

healthy

Yes, health is the only issue.

He’s improved his offense, and reduced his fouling. If he stays on the court he continues to get better.

The only issue is whether or not he stays healthy.

by lsjogren on Aug 23, 2010 8:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Healthy

"Easy for you to say coach, you don't have Big Greg rolling up on your blind side about to lay the wood to you." - Batum

by No you di'nt on Aug 23, 2010 9:29 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

A nasty streak.....

Perhaps a 7ft. tall version of Mr. “T”, yeah that’s the ticket…

P.S. And a full length red & black Blazer’s Edge mink coat.

2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Aug 23, 2010 10:12 AM PDT reply actions  

guys that big with a nasty streak

are in prison…
:-)

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Aug 25, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

My unreal expectation.

I want Wilt Chamberlain, Kareem, Artis Gilmore, Mose Malone, Bill Walton, Arydas, and _____________ (put your favorite center here) wrapped up in on one package. Oh, forgot to take my medications this morning.

by toolman on Aug 23, 2010 10:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Better than he's capable of being.

I just really don’t see these signs of greatness yall are seeing. Yes, I believe in per minute stat systems and he scores fantastic on PER and WP48, but we’re talking about a guy who fouls like it’s going out of style.

The changes he’s going to have to make in terms of how aggressively he rebounds and defends in order to get his foul rate under control is going to transform him into a much lesser player than he has been. I’ve long since given up my dreams of a slightly worse Alonzo or slightly better Dikembe. At this point, I’d be happy if Greg became roughly as good as Bogut.

But our title dreams are running on fumes. If even that.

by howlingfantods on Aug 23, 2010 10:45 AM PDT reply actions  

Joel's is quite a bit lower

Even per 36 minutes he wouldn’t foul out all the time. Greg’s is worse right now than that of any all-time great center. And only Roy Hibbert is in that region in the league.

"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban

by Norsktroll on Aug 23, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

The blazer's backcourt are consistently beaten

and the blazer defense isn’t directing the offense toward the middle when it is beaten. That result’s in the big men being one on one with the opposing guard. At this time in NBA history that situation is in the guard’s favor. Switching defense allows more breakdowns away from the middle. Poor foot + switching defense = injured Oden.

by 7677maniac on Aug 23, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

If there wasn't such a huge precedent established

whereby centers have been able to significantly eliminate early fouling trouble, I’d agree with you, but I just don’t see it. Is Kendrick Perkins less effective now than he was as a 2nd year player averaging 6.4 PF/36 min (Greg was 6.0 last year)? What about Al Jefferson (6.7 as a rookie), Joel (6.4 in his 2nd year), Hibbert (7.7 as a rookie), or Shawn Kemp (6.6 as a rookie)?

You could also look at Joe Smith, Biedrins, Varejao, or Bynum as bigs who came into the league with similar foul rates that got them under control. I agree that it’d be nice if it weren’t an issue, but it’s not like there isn’t common precedent for young big men improving their foul rates, as opposed to something like rebounding with Lamarcus.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

@royster, your examples are of guys who fouled a lot in spot minutes.

Here’s a list of all seasons of players who averaged over 6 pfs per 36 minutes, who played over 20 mpg.

Guys who average under 15 mpg especially as rookies don’t have to worry about fouls, because they’re never going to be in foul trouble given their roles. Guys who their teams put on for 20 minutes plus, their teams want them to play bigger roles but these players are unable to because of their inability to stay out of foul trouble. Big difference between the two.

by howlingfantods on Aug 23, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Now that's just getting to be arbitrary

Especially considering we heard endlessly from Nate about how they were telling Greg to not worry about fouling and just play because we had Joel around backing him up, especially his rookie year.

As for the rest, there’s simply too much of a feedback loop to really say definitively. Were they fouling more because they knew their time on the court was limited, or were they playing less because they were fouling so much? Biedrins WS/min in his second year was better than any of the other fairly terrible centers on GS’s roster (really just Foyle and Murphy/Diogu if you’re being generous), I doubt that he wouldn’t have played more if he didn’t foul at a stupidly high rate. Same with Al Jefferson’s 2nd year when I find it hard to believe that the Celtics wouldn’t have been happy to have him play more of Raef’s minutes. And of course, Joel was a starter in Milwaukee in his second year when he average 6.4 PF/36 and 16 mpg.

Admittedly, these guys fall slightly short of the cutoff, but it really just seems ridiculously arbitrary to me to say: “well, he played 20 mpg, so fouls limited him from playing more, but this guy played 15 mpg, so the limited minutes caused him to foul more”. I doubt anyone here thinks that Greg will ever evolve into a Lebron-esque foul rate, but that explanation just smacks of rationalizing an already arrived at hypothesis to me.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's arbitrary at all.

There are set rotation numbers that are pretty universal in this league. Most bigs have a rotation of 25-35 mpg (starters) or 10-15 mpg (backups). Backups pretty much never worry about fouling out.

Biedrins might be a lot better than Foyle, but Biedrins started 2 games, Foyle started 72. Clearly Montgomery felt more comfortable with a limited vet like Foyle over a teenaged Latvian who didn’t speak any english and had limited basketball skills, and shot free throws at a 30% rate.

Raef played pretty well the year before the year you’re talking about. It’s not uncommon for teams to play the vet for a year longer ahead of a young first or second year player.

by howlingfantods on Aug 23, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

But, I mean, believe what you guys want.

I’d much rather be happy to see Oden exceed my very modest expectations than to be in your shoes, where you guys are just setting yourselves up for disappointment by expecting greatness out of this guy.

by howlingfantods on Aug 23, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

To clarify

It’s not that I think it’s not any cause for concern, it’s just something I see as fixable, which makes it way less of a concern for me than his repeated injuries. Mainly I don’t understand the “there’s no way he can stop fouling without completely neutering his game” viewpoint.

#52

by Royster on Aug 23, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

To make it to the second round? He just needs to be available.
To win a second round series? He needs to be an impact player, but maybe not an All Star.
To compete with the L*kers for a Finals berth? He probably does need to be an All Star.

"You know, when you are in the game, you hear 20,000 people behind you, you don't feel anything."
- Nicolas Batum on playing through his shoulder injury during the 2010 playoffs.

by halo_on on Aug 23, 2010 10:50 AM PDT reply actions  

All good centers

Improve ot only their foul rate but also their rebounding, shot blocking, passing…. Just take a look at Camby’s and Pryz’s first couple of seasons and what their best seasons and career averages. I think you are selling Oden loooow!

by Odenrising on Aug 23, 2010 11:09 AM PDT reply actions  

You can't always get what you want...

  …but if you try sometimes you just might find, you get what you need.

I thought right before he went down last season Oden was rounding into the player he needs to be for The Blazers. I sensed a growing confidence and witnessed some dominating stretches of play. That’s what made his injury that much more painful to witness as a fan.

I don’t know, a big part of me doesn’t even like threads like this. Since he hit high school Oden has been told what he “is” or “needs” to be

I know, we are evaluating Blazer talent and roster realities in relationship to immediate and future goals. Which ALL fans do. But I’m tired of defining Oden, and then having circumstance and reality and random chance barge in and redefinde Oden again.

I think this upcoming season probably shows us not what we need Oden to be, but what Oden is capable of becoming. I’m not going to bother to attach expectation or definition to a human being that has covered the spectrum of attached expectation as harshly and diversely as Oden. For many, he has gone from being a Wilt Chamberlain, Bill Russell once in a decade up and coming center…to a total N.B.A. bust. Were either extreme of definition fair to place upon someone? Probably not.

Here is what I can say. Again, before injury, I was impressed with what I was seeing from Oden. He was showing the ability to dominate and intimidate from the center position in a way very few centers in the N.B.A. are capable of doing. So the talent to be what we would “like” Oden to be, IMO exists. What as Blazers fans we NEED is him to be able to remain healthy enough to translate that into “seasons and post-seasons” of N.B.A. play…we don’t need anything more or less than that…but that isn’t easy and it certainly isn’t a given.

I think however I am at a place where I’m NOT going to once again start to attach to Oden what he “needs” to be. Ultimately whether Oden becomes that dominating Blazers center we as Blazer fans desire and/or Oden becomes a very tall dentist with unusual stories to tell while your mouth is full of cotton and novocaine will be controlled by factors that I think are currently undefinable and unpredictable.

   Oden can be whatever he can be. He needs to try to give himself a career in the N.B.A. if only because it’s obviously the path to the best financial opportunity for himself. I would say, I think he’s one more major injury away from REALLY having to re-evaluate what is possible for himself. However, who can say if that major injury will come? He’s young enough that it IS possible that most of this has been just Terrible circumstance.

  I hope that ultimately Oden figures out what he needs and if that correspondes with what I want as a Blazer fan? Fine…it will be a Win, Win….

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Aug 23, 2010 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Happy

If he thinks happy thoughts, then happiness will follow.

by tominhawaii on Aug 23, 2010 12:25 PM PDT reply actions  

I got your happy thoughts RIGHT HERE buddy!

I'm a Greg Oden honk, yeah.

Even when I was still a Sonic fan, I liked Oden more than Kevin Durant.

by AK1984 on Jun 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT

by Tyler Durrden on Aug 23, 2010 12:37 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

We all talk about his health

but you also need to be concerned about what’s going on in his head. How long will it take before he trusts his body? If he’s on the court worrying about re-injury or every ach and pain it will greatly limit his impact on the game. I honestly don’t think anyone can understand how sore and beat down these guys get. Most are probably living on anti-inflammatories and who knows what else to get pain under control so they are able to perform. The Blazers certainly have someone on staff to help keep his head straight. So GO being “happy” is also an important concern.

by toolman on Aug 23, 2010 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I couldn't agree more, it was just sarcasm towards TIH

I'm a Greg Oden honk, yeah.

Even when I was still a Sonic fan, I liked Oden more than Kevin Durant.

by AK1984 on Jun 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT

by Tyler Durrden on Aug 23, 2010 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Question about patella injuries

I don’t remember whether this was really discussed at the time of Greg’s and Joel’s injuries, but I wonder —

Is a broken patella what you would call an “injury-prone” kind of injury? In other words, would you say, Greg and Joel’s knees are always going to be a big question mark because of this, or would you call it a freak occurrence and once it heals it should be good?

If anyone can answer this, I think that would tell us a lot about whether to expect both of these guys to be (or reach) 100% and stay there.

by Kaboomm on Aug 23, 2010 2:11 PM PDT reply actions  

No.

Once a broken bone heals, it’s healed – and really, the bone will be slightly stronger than it was before. In Oden’s case, there was no ligament damage, so the injury will have zero long-term consequences (unless you count the mental hurdles that come with feeling your knee cap shatter like a rock against a brick wall). Bottom line, Gred Oden of 2010-11 will be equal to Gred Oden of 2009-10. As for Joel, he did suffer severe ligament damage and will have a much tougher time returning to form, short term or long term.

by mannoname on Aug 23, 2010 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

when it's full of titanium it is

I'm a Greg Oden honk, yeah.

Even when I was still a Sonic fan, I liked Oden more than Kevin Durant.

by AK1984 on Jun 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT

by Tyler Durrden on Aug 23, 2010 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Titanium is not usually used in the patella

Usually 4.0mm partially-threaded, canulated stainless-steel screws with 18 gauge wire in a figure eight fashion. Steel is stiffer.

by odenator69 on Aug 23, 2010 10:21 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

You sound like someone familiar with the procedure.

The only thing the Oregonian reported after the surgery was this on Dec 6, 2009

Roberts inserted two screws into Oden’s left knee to reattach the patella and that bone now has to repair and bond itself. Pritchard said this typically takes two months. Through that process, in which Oden will be forced to do very little, he will experience muscular atrophy and it will take roughly two more months of rehabilitation to recover from that.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 23, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

The O doesn't print operative reports

and Dr. Roberts doesn’t need to day anything other than a summary to the reporter unless the surgery is unusual, unique or highly interesting.

by odenator69 on Aug 23, 2010 11:19 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

We don't know why Greg fractured his patella.

According published reports, Dr. Roberts does(did not) believe it was related to his prior chip fracture. Regardless of the cause, the bone is healed. Most of the remodeling should have returned the bone to it’s preinjury strength, though you may still see radiographic evidence of the break. It looked liked a clean transverse break on the video so it should have reduced anatomically during surgery and therefore decreases his risk for arthritis.

Joel on the other hand reruptured his patellar tendon. These take at least 3 months to fully heal for a real person. He’s going to be really stiff and not in playing shape for several months. Don’t count on Joel at the start of the season, maybe he’ll be in good playing shape after the all-star game or the beginning of the playoffs.

by odenator69 on Aug 23, 2010 7:04 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Joel is already ahead of schedule

you’re going to be surprised what you see from Przy, in October

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

If there are two players I wouldn't bet against

it’s Przy and Batum. They’re going to have to lock Joel in the training room on opening night to keep him off the floor

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll be surprised, but delighted, if that happens.

I suppose you are getting that from what Mike Barrett said (after talking to Przy). I sure hope it comes true, but it could just be Przy’s positive attitude talking.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 23, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Joel's doctor said the same thing, a few weeks before

and Przy’s positive attitude is certainly not a hindrance re: his comeback

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

broken bones on giants are different than normal sized folx

because of their size and weight, stress fractures can and often happen and repeat. that said, a patella is better than broken bones in the feet

by utahcoyote on Aug 23, 2010 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

The broken patella is healed

The problem being it was a stress fracture and the stress came from BB. Therefore that can re-uccur

hg

by BBK on Aug 23, 2010 2:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Time to move on from Oden.

 It is obvious there is more to the injury than is being let on, with no timetable to return set. This guy has had 2 years and nearly 2 years of downtime with injuries…. Move on people and face it that Oden is a bust.

by GeneTheMachine on Aug 23, 2010 5:05 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree something has delayed his recovery, but it's too early to give up on Oden.

His injury was originally estimated by KP (who had to be repeating what the doctors told him) as taking roughly 4 months to recover (healing plus rehab time). That’s why there was originally some optimism by Oden (based on what the doctors told him) that he might return for the playoffs last year.

In June Nate told everyone that Oden’s new schedule was to start playing 3-on-3 in the middle of August and 5-on-5 the first week in Sept. He also said the plan was for Oden to be 100% by the opening of training camp. Oden is obviously behind that schedule now, which I find troubling because this could become another year of waiting on Oden (to start playing, then getting into basketball shape again, re-finding his confidence, re-learning his newly learned skills, etc). But at this point we simply have to wait until the doctors clear him to resume. Then hope he can get his conditioning back, stop fouling, and re-establish the skills he worked on last summer before the playoffs begin this year.

Hopefully Oden will one day be seen as a excellent to great basketball player that enabled the Blazers to win a championship after he had a rough start due to injuries early in his career. In that case, he may yet be considered the right #1 pick in the 2007 draft (depending on what success Durant has in leading his team’s to championships). If his career is cut short or physically limited by injuries he will no doubt be labeled as a bust, but that would be unfair (he can’t prevent the injuries he’s had). It really isn’t fair to label him a bust unless he becomes healthy and then fails to contribute to the team as expected from a #1 pick.

It could be another 5 years or more until the ending of this story becomes clear.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 23, 2010 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought it was interesting that Kenny and Jay were talking about this, at noon

I swear they’re getting their Blazer-related topics by researching BE every morning. Dave should get more plugs than just when they have Ben on the air

Cho and Greg are letting the doctors dictate the timeline for Oden’s return. This is nothing different than with Martell’s foot in ‘08 or any other broken-bone injury a Blazer player has suffered in recent history. I’m not concerned about Greg’s ability to pick up where he left off. Bayno remains optimistic (and he knows Oden’s capabilities better than random guys on the internet) The new/leaner Greg is also a good sign that once the doctors clear Oden for basketball activity, he’ll be able to get up to speed faster than expected.

I sure wouldn’t want to be part of that chip on his shoulder

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Greg is indeed leaner I would think that would help him come back faster.

But training camp starts in 5 weeks and he hasn’t started playing any basketball yet, not even 3-on-3. Hopefully, he will be playing 5-on-5 full court when training camp starts, but then how long until he’s in game shape again? I don’t want to guess based on what happened after the MF surgery, because I’m no doctor and I have no idea how that compares to his most recent surgery. Plus I don’t want to contemplate that it could be as bad as last time (when he never really got in game shape all season).

Perhaps someone that has tracked this type of knee injury has an unbiased guess? (I’ll bet Rich Cho has a good guess.) Will it take 2-3-4 months or longer (as it did last time)? I won’t guess, but if it takes more than a month it could mean Camby starts at center on Oct 26 against Phoenix, and Nate will be starting another season making adjustments before seeing “his team” again.

Did anyone outside the Blazer organization really doubt that Oden would be 100% by the time camp started? Especially after the talk about him possibly being ready by the playoffs last April? (Which Oden said, and KP verified, the doctors told him was a possibility.) I sure didn’t. But maybe he’ll have a great next 5 weeks and still be ready by camp. I hope so.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 23, 2010 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who is in town for Greg to play 3-on-3 against?

If the doctors say don’t play, he won’t play. I don’t think this is all that mysterious.

I also don’t think he’s that far away, but until the other players starting running up and down the PF floor next week, it’s hard to say if Oden is really “behind schedule”

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

If the doctors say don’t play, he won’t play. I don’t think this is all that mysterious

I don’t recall anyone suggesting that he would or should play against his doctors orders, but thanks for clearing that up.

Maybe he’s been secretly playing 3-on-3 games at 24 Hour Fitness all summer. Nobody would notice.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 24, 2010 2:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t recall anyone suggesting that he would or should play against his doctors orders

and I don’t recall suggesting that anyone has

Cho and Greg are deferring to the doctors, which is smart. No drama is required, but curiousity must be served

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 24, 2010 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ciao

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Aug 23, 2010 6:28 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ciao

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Aug 23, 2010 6:28 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Healthy.

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Aug 23, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions  

What Oden needs to be depends on what you want the team to do

1. Make the playoffs? Don’t him him at all.

2. Home court in the playoffs? 60-65 games, 25 mpg, probably like 11-8-1.5

3. Top 3 team in the West, poised to win a playoff series or two? 70+ games, 26-30 mpg, something along the lines of 14-10-2.5

4. In the title discussion? 70+ games, 30+ mpg, 16-13-3 and healthy for the playoffs

I give him like 85% chance for at least scenario 2. I’d give him 50% odds for at least scenario 3, and maybe 10% odds scenario 4.

by GMan83201 on Aug 23, 2010 5:54 PM PDT reply actions  

The big question mark.

It goes without saying that Oden’s health is crucial to the team’s championship hopes, so I won’t waste any more time on that one. So, what does he need to be in order for the Blazers to be successful in the long run? Here’s a start.
1. He needs became a much more disciplined player on defense. Everybody gets beat sometimes, but you have to know the difference between a good foul and a stupid one. If he already has a foul in the first quarter, for instance, that second foul is a hell of a lot more important to the team than preventing an opponent from scoring an uncontested layup. Give up the layup and save your fouls for the fourth quarter, when it really matters.
2. He needs to assert himself on offense. In other words, when he gets the ball he should look to score, not pass it out the first chance he gets. I don’t care how many turnovers and how many wins he costs the Blazers in November and December because in the long run, the team will be better for having made that sacrifice early on. They need an inside game and Oden, injuries and all, still represents Portland’s best chance at attaining one.
3. A little support. I know it’s a little out of their control, but I do believe that the Blazers coaching staff could do a better job advocating for Oden when it comes to foul calls. He hacks, yes. You would have to be blind not to see that. But at times he’s also punished for being big.

by mannoname on Aug 23, 2010 6:00 PM PDT reply actions  

He needs to assert himself on offense. In other words, when he gets the ball he should look to score, not pass it out the first chance he gets

I like the fact that when Greg was getting the ball in the post last December, he was taking his time and surveying the floor before starting his move. Oden was able to feed the ball back to Miller for some back-door lay-ins, which tells me he has good court vision and is unselfish. I think he’s going to be a good “hub” to run an offense through, if he can jut stay healthy and regain his confidence

I do agree that he needs to always attack the basket when he’s not double-teamed, and learn how to catch/hold the ball up high so it can’t be stripped. An aggressive Oden can wreak havoc on opposing front lines, and put them into the penalty (and their starting 4-5 on the bench with foul trouble) faster than any Blazer player in recent history

Once he gets comfortable again…feed the beast. Andre is familiar with this strategy

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Aug 23, 2010 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension
Cap004_small
A Running Team should Know How to Finish the Fast Break
Lamb_small
Just What Can the Blazers Do This Offseason? Dwight AND Deron?
My-top-20-shaw-brothers-kung-fu-films_small
$#!&, or Why Ray Felton Is Secretly Still Playing For the Denver Nuggets

Recent FanPosts

Blazers_birdman_is_not_welcome_here_pic_small
Serious Injuries to Danilo Gallinari and Chauncey Billups
Suit_small
Woulda, shoulda, coulda
Small
Freeland agent's turn to play with Blazers's back office's nerves
Bns_small
The "Improve the team" Thread 2/5
My-top-20-shaw-brothers-kung-fu-films_small
"Give Him The Max!" --- A Realistic Discussion On Nic Batum
Small
If not Greg...who?
Small
Holding on to assets or percepieved assets to long.
Smiley_small
What YOU Would Accept For LMA
Ss_small
Predict the All-Star reserves.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...
Since everybody else was showing off their art I thought I'd join the crowd with my Felton picture.
Gerald Wallace - Charcoal

Recent FanShots

In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
L.A. Getting some love from Dirk
Earl Watson Underwent Laser Therapy On Sprained Ankle (ATTN: Ray Felton)
Chat with Michael Wilbon: I asked a question and got a decent answer.
Arenas holding open workout
LaMarcus Won't Believe All-Star Status Till He Hears It Out Of Stern's Mouth
Kevin Love Suspended Two Games For Stepping On Scola['s throat!]
Clippers Ink Kenyon Martin
Hollinger Playoff Odds Pick Blazers as Western Champs?
Nicolas Batum and Wesley Matthews Super share what their favorite Super Bowl snacks are. Nicolas...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm