Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Should Professional Athletes be Allowed Time Off for The Birth of Their Children?

I was listening to the Dan Patrick Show podcast the other day and they were making fun Yankee’s slugger Mark Teixeira for missing two games for the birth of his third child with no complications. Then later, I was listening to the BS Report podcast and Bill Simmon’s friend Johnny, who is a die hard Yankees fan, made the same complaint.

Johnny’s biggest point of contention is that Teixeira makes $22.5 million per season. Johnny thought that if a player is being paid that much to play just 162 games per year, not counting playoffs, then they need to make every game a priority and missing just two games is unacceptable. At first I thought it was a bit harsh, and then after thinking about it a bit, I ended up agreeing with Johnny. And when you consider the NBA only plays 82 game, missing even a quarter of an NBA game, for a child’s birth is unacceptable.

Star-divide

Professional athletes are paid ridiculous amounts of money to play a game that most people have to pay to play. I feel they are obligated to plan their pregnancies for the off season.

I actually am a bit more extreme than that, I feel that they should not have children while they are a professional athlete because children are a burden, they make you unhappy, and they are a distraction. I also realize that hippies and right wing liberals would probably freak out over that policy, so I softened it to saving child birthing for the off season.

Now, if I was an owner or GM of a professional team, I would mandate that players do not have children during the season, and if they did, they would be fined. I would have the team offer free contraceptives and offer bonuses to players whose spouses/girlfriends got Depo-Provera shots during the time that would cause the child to be born during the season or playoffs. I think offering abortion resources would create more controversy than the good that would be intended, by such an offer, so the controversy would outweigh the benefit.

If memory serves me, I believe Brandon Roy had his child during the season. When I consider that the child was born out of wedlock and he slacked off and missed games for it, I think it sends a bad message to the young Blazers fans that look up to Roy. Roy needs to send a message to the fans that he is committed to the team ABOVE ALL ELSE, and that he supports the sanctity of marriage.

So, Blazers fans, what do you think, should professional athletes be allowed time off for the birth of their children? Does it matter if it is the first, second, or third child? (Even I think complications deserve time off, since things are complicated, but there wouldn’t have been an issue had the baby been planned better.) Also, should players be contractually obligated to plan their family pregnancies?

Poll
Should professional athletes be allowed time off for the birth of their children?
Yes
373 votes
No
60 votes
Undecided
20 votes

453 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 118 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think I disagree

Umpqua: "Just follow the dead government proof link to find out."

by 92wastheyear on Aug 15, 2010 8:08 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I know I disagree

Although they should not miss games beyind a day or to after a healthy birth.

Life is life and there is nothing anybody is going to do to change that.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Aug 15, 2010 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Babies outweigh playing a game, no matter the price paid to play.
Owners giving time off shows they care about the things important to players.
The timing should be in the off season but
1/3 of births are unplanned a common happening.
If parents want the birthday to happen in July so they can have sunny birthdays I will allow that to happen

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Aug 15, 2010 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'll leave it up to each individual owner to decide

and use their own discretion. they are the ones that are paying the salaries. they should be the ones who determine the “benefits” as well.

"It's not the dress that makes you look fat, its the fat that makes you look fat!" ~Al Bundy
"Did they really expect me to bow down to Jesus?!?" ~Sophia
"At first glance, I saw a fairly unremarkable penis." ~Sophia on Greg Oden

by Philthyanimal on Aug 15, 2010 8:19 AM PDT reply actions  

If allowing you a few days off for the birth of a child is a "benefit"

then we are all in trouble. I know it is in a lot of workplaces, but those places suck.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Aug 15, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol

I can see them not paying him for games missed, but to actually expect him to skip the birth of his child for game? I’m not even a father, but Roy could miss Game 7 against the Lakers if his child is being born and I wouldn’t think less of him.

Portland could coast along with their superior talent and stay right with us. Now that Portland woke up, the hammer cometh down.

Bayless > Daffy Duck after 3 cans of rockstar

by Batumshakalaka on Aug 15, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ditto

Some things are more important than basketball.

by ictoagsn on Aug 15, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol +1

Checc my swagga
CP3 NAHHHHHHHHH we got ARMON

by in~ur~fizace on Aug 15, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Disagree

Maybe they could be neutered when they sign a contract? You could maybe keep their balls in a jar until after they were done with their contract. Then you could like sew ’em back on.

The only exception of course would be Dre. He could keep his cause, well, they’re just aren’t enough Dres in the world.

by Jeffe Portland on Aug 15, 2010 8:32 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

I thought about this for a while

and realized that some of these guys could be gay. Then you wouldn’t really have to cut ’em off right? We could just make those ones wear pink shorts or something so we know who is who.

by Jeffe Portland on Aug 15, 2010 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

It's just sports

Family always comes first

by TheVCE on Aug 15, 2010 8:42 AM PDT reply actions   4 recs

Agreed

Family comes before any game. Your child’s birth is more important than scoring 20 against (insert least fav team here). This is a ridiculous question.

Also, for tominhawaii what is a “right wing liberal”?

by BlazerNation on Aug 16, 2010 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if you look at it as a job for them (which it is)

men are also allowed to take time off of work for a newborn so if a player misses a game or two because of the birth of a child (whether in or out wedlock because that’s how the world is these days and doesn’t make the child less or more important either way) then that’s fine. I’m sure playoffs would make things a bit more complicated (hence LA being there for the birth of his son but making it back in time to play during the Rockets/Blazers series in ‘09) but during the regular season it’s important but not crucial. If anything we’ve learned over this last season that losing half the team to injury doesn’t stop it from getting to the playoffs so losing one for a few games shouldn’t be that big of a deal. Family is always going to come first (and I’m talking only missing games for births or other equally important things, not a 7 year old’s choir concert) and having a child is something that maybe you can try and plan but it just doesn’t work that way usually.

Besides, how many guys would really be able to concentrate on the game when they are in New York playing a game while their wife, girlfriend, ex-girlfriend or whatever is in another city giving birth to their son or daughter? I’m sure some can, but kinda makes me wonder what kind of guy they are if they can turn off something that big just to score some buckets.

by somanluna1 on Aug 17, 2010 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Their first job should be being a dad if they have kids.

But it would have been hard if you were Shawn Kemp with multiple children from multiple women.

My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.

by OCBlazerFan1 on Aug 15, 2010 8:45 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

If he really cared about that family member, why not just wheel his or her gurney into a game? Grampa’s IV drip in court-side seats? Better than a fuzz TV in some lonely hospital bed.
same could apply to child birth. Just have the baby in the stadium or heck, locker room. Those things aren’t really used except at halftime.

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 15, 2010 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

One word, just one word: Jumbotron.

Better than those junior dancers, and less creepy.

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 15, 2010 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm liking this.

You could have the first hundred people or so down on the court to participate somehow?

by Jeffe Portland on Aug 15, 2010 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

And what about the players who are distracted by crazy relatives? Shouldn’t they be required to schedule their mental breakdowns during the off season?

by Corvid on Aug 15, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow.

People are allowed time off from nearly all salaried jobs for the birth of a child. Family first.

I honestly can’t tell if TiH was kidding on this one.

by GMan83201 on Aug 15, 2010 8:58 AM PDT reply actions  

That was my assumption too.

Most of the ‘no’ votes have to be ironic as well.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Aug 15, 2010 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll admit, the TIH is an artist

when it comes to tongue-in-cheek humor.

by dbomb on Aug 15, 2010 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think athletes should plan to have their children during the off season so they have the time to help with parenting duties during the first few months, not so they don’t miss games.

I think TiH’s argument is pretty ridiculous. Money? How much money do you need to make before you don’t get to see the birth of your kids?

by billsfan4life on Aug 15, 2010 8:59 AM PDT reply actions  

from a practical, "family planning", standpoint this makes sense

but most children are not conceived to schedule. A watched pot never boils, that sort of thing…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Aug 15, 2010 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

the mothers could just hold off until after the Playoffs. I know it might get a little uncomfortable, but this is the playoffs!
“Just a few more week’s sweety.”

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 15, 2010 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Tom, you hardly go far enough here!

Having kids is just one of many distractions for athletes! They also shouldn’t get married or have girlfriends, because that really opens the door for children. Furthermore, they shouldn’t be allowed to talk to their relatives, especially their mothers, because you know how many times mom is going to ask, “when are you getting married? when are you having kids?” – athletes don’t need that added pressure. Not only that, but if the players are in contact with their friends and relatives, they might find out potentially game-missing information like someone having a life threatening disease, or getting married, or having kids, or getting into school, etc. I mean, if we can’t have players missing time for the birth of a child, we certainly can’t have them missing time for a death or and illness in the family either. They just need to make arrangements for all their loved ones to get married/get sick/graduate/die in the offseason.

Sure, other less important professionals, such as doctors and nurses, teachers, military servicememebers, pilots, postal workers, law enforcement, firemen, and clergy all take time off for family issues. And don’t even get started with the time off politicians need for similar circumstances. But that doesn’t mean player should be allowed that distraction!

by jigglyai on Aug 15, 2010 9:21 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

It feels stupid to make a serious comment in this thread...

Paid time off while wife/girlfriend is in the hospital. If mother and baby are home and player misses a game with team permission, no problem but unpaid with pro-rated salary reduction.

The Shawn Kemp rule: No more than one baby per season!!

by 52therim on Aug 15, 2010 9:28 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

At least you seem to at least suspect that you're making a serious comment in a parody thread

That puts you ahead of all the poor folks who were caught in Tom’s nefarious web.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 15, 2010 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

All athletes should be voluntarily sterilized upon signing their contract.

The millions of dollars they make, demands it. In the case an athlete had someone knocked up before the contract was signed, the fetus will be split in half and the pieces given to two neutral parties. Deaths in the family will not matter, as the athlete will be paid well enough to require them to renounce all family ties, becoming persona non grata in all relationships outside of the team, and eventually television blustering.

by zaruga on Aug 15, 2010 9:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Star players should be allowed to have as many kids as they please--even during the season....

….providing they grant the franchise exclusive rights to draft & sign their offspring should they prove to have athletic ability.

Think of the windfall for Jelly Bean Bryant’s team if he’d signed such an agreement before fathering Kobe! Likewise in the case of Bobby Bonds, who fathered Barry Bonds…

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 15, 2010 9:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Of course, signing Harvey Catchings to such an agreement wouldn't have helped the 76ers

Namely because his hoopster offspring stars in the WNBA.

I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.

by hurryup09 on Aug 15, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting question. Nice post Tom. Very well thought out and insightful.

Personally I don’t think people should be allowed any time off for offspring being born. If they were irresponsible enough to schedule their babies being born while they need to be at work, they can suffer the consequences. Just my opinion.

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Aug 15, 2010 9:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes of course they should be able to, and for any friend or family member that dies.

Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. - 'The Sports Guy' Bill Simmons

by doublezeroduck on Aug 15, 2010 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

In accordance with the way I normally post here.

I’m going to point out that statistics suggest that people have children infrequently enough that it shouldn’t greatly affect the outcome of the season.

I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.—Dune

by Muad'Dib on Aug 15, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

rec for consistency

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Aug 15, 2010 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1 for randomness

If Luke Babbitt and Jerryd Bayless played a game of table tennis I'm not sure who would win but the ping pong ball would lose no matter what. - Ben 7/16/2010

by jamon51 on Aug 16, 2010 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I propose a compromise:

live-stream the birth of the child on the jumbotron during the game (or go picture-in-picture), that way he doesn’t miss the game

them climbin' in yo windows, they snachin' yo people up

by TheTinfoil on Aug 15, 2010 10:41 AM PDT reply actions  

The Blazers are hiring so many new media people and videographers that this really should be manageable

And then they could name it live in the arena via video conference, similar to the birth of James T. Kirk

"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban

by Norsktroll on Aug 15, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Caesarean section if the birth of the child would interfere with an important playoff game or road trip

"Listening to the media only increases your odds of failing at whatever you are doing" - Mark Cuban

by Norsktroll on Aug 15, 2010 10:57 AM PDT reply actions  

I bet that happens already

Not necessarily C-sections, but induced births. Lots of families do that already — though sometimes it’s based on the OB doctor’s schedule, not the couple’s schedule.

by Corvid on Aug 15, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

This post is sexist

Why should the responsibility for birth control be placed only on the wives and girlfriends? How come you didn’t mention vasectomies?

by Corvid on Aug 15, 2010 11:06 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm going to assume that this post is a joke.....

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Aug 15, 2010 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

No, jokes have punchlines.

Tom’s post was more like a mental vasectomy.

by MiledAnimal on Aug 15, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You also don't want

players having sexual relations the night before or on game day. Factor in the nine month window for pregnancy, international play, summer league etc…

 it’s a good idea but probably a logistical nightmare.

by meatwad3 on Aug 15, 2010 12:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Oh absolutely. I think Paul Allen needs to monitor that more closely.

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Aug 15, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was thinking Stern

All he has to do is come up with a clever name to call these opportunistic pregnancies. Something like oh I don’t know..

 NBAnchor Babies?

Nah sounds too much like a saturday morning cartoon.

by meatwad3 on Aug 15, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sports is a business

Just because they are paid ungodly ammounts of money. They should be afforded the same things normal workers get. Just cause they make there money playing a game shouldnt exlude them from having children married or not. Its like saying your manager, boss, cfo types of people that make more money then you should they not get time off for a child birth? Some companys like the one I work @ give up 2 a full month fully paid after the birth of a child(fmla) so why shouldnt sports players get that same luxary. Its not like they are taking the whole season of or even 1-2 weeks. We as homers and sports lovers who support our players thru thick and think should get what ever other person in the country gets.

Why should they have to plan for a child for an “offseason?” Most children are, I hate to say this, mistakes, not in the sense that they are unwanted, but conflict with things that are going on in life. So I think it would be almost unconsititional to tell athlets that they have to “pla” child birth around an offseason.

Checc my swagga
CP3 NAHHHHHHHHH we got ARMON

by in~ur~fizace on Aug 15, 2010 12:43 PM PDT reply actions  

HUH?

When I consider that the child was born out of wedlock and he slacked off and missed games for it, I think it sends a bad message to the young Blazers fans that look up to Roy. Roy needs to send a message to the fans that he is committed to the team ABOVE ALL ELSE, and that he supports the sanctity of marriage.

I had to read over this about three times to make sure i read it and understood it correctly. In this current time in history i can not for the life of me understand how you could be seriously saying that. I mean really, his LONG time girlfriend had his baby. This isn’t Shawn Kemp with 12 kids by 12 different women, your statement is ludicrous. They are not married, who cares i would not judge a person for that if i was you. Ever here of the adage “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” There are people out there, alot of them, who do not get married simply beacuse things work just fine as they are.

My best friend for example: he married this girl and she completely changed after they got married. BTW they are now divorced. Also how does anything Roy has done regarding his girlfriend or his child sent a bad message? I cant understand, he is a stand up guy, you dont hear about his having affairs or domestic issues or anything.

I am ussually not critical of others statements but yours sir was………well i dont have the correct discription other than as i said earlier, Ludicrous

by blazerbeliever97504 on Aug 15, 2010 1:14 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Also,

no man should be commited to anything but his family ABOVE ALL ELSE. Seriously?!?! Really?

by blazerbeliever97504 on Aug 15, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

consider the source, friend. you've been TIH-rolled.

them climbin' in yo windows, they snachin' yo people up

by TheTinfoil on Aug 15, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ahh, i honestly hardly ever look at the authors....

But yes since it was TiH it makes much more sense now. reading over posts at work i do not get the time to fully look over the posts.

by blazerbeliever97504 on Aug 15, 2010 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Male professional athletes, yes. Female posfessional athletes, no.

Females are genetically designed for childbirth. They should therefore be expected to play through it.

A time out should be offered in lieu of a penalty for the last push. I mean, it would be wrong to penalize a female athlete for giving birth in the field of play, even though it is technically another participant entering on her side.

Men, however, clearly need time off to work all these changes through their heads.

In KP I trusted!

by LaoTzu on Aug 15, 2010 4:18 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

can't the league step in and dictate when insemination of the player's wives or mistresses takes place?

If insemination is only allowed to take place in the months of January, February and March then this wouldn’t even be an issue. *the mariners, and pirates should be allowed to inseminate whenever they like, cause no way in hell they have any important games

I'm a Greg Oden honk, yeah.

Even when I was still a Sonic fan, I liked Oden more than Kevin Durant.

by AK1984 on Jun 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT

by Tyler Durrden on Aug 15, 2010 7:48 PM PDT reply actions  

My sister was a teacher

and her two children were both born in July. If she can do it, so can they.

by Section323 on Aug 15, 2010 8:55 PM PDT reply actions  

LOL. I married into a family full of teachers.

We buy birthday cards in bulk for August. It’s kind of a family joke whether it was good planning (ironic, since they all were raised Catholic) or the fact that the November nights get cold in Minnesota.

by Corvid on Aug 15, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seems like a contradiction to me.

Let’s build a young team, let’s create a family environment, let’s encourage these guys to be positive role models for the children of our community.

Then let’s control how and when these people can become fathers… WTF???!?!??

I understand the concern with games off. But the world has changed. In the 1950’s, there were plenty of times that men received a phone call at work letting them know that their child had been born. Proud papa would pass out cigars to his co-workers, then go to the bar and pass out more there, then EVENTUALLY get to the hospital.

We live in a different world now. Fathers are more active in the birth of these children, and having been through it, I think that’s the way it should be. I watched my daughter be born. I watched a midwife react with lightning speed to remove the umbilical cord from around my daughter’s neck… three times. I watched the color return to my child as the midwife saved her life. I wouldn’t have had it any other way.

I watched my son be born. I cut the umbilical cord, and held him briefly. Then I watched him stop breathing. I watched doctor’s and nurses revive him. Not so long ago, I wouldn’t have been in the room when these births took place. Not so long ago, I could have lost either of those children and not have had the chance to lay eyes on them before they passed.

No, planning for a certain time? It’s possible, but there are complications to that. For instance, my ex-wife was on a certain form of birth control after our daughter was born. We decided we wanted another child, and for the kids to be three to four years apart. She went off that form of birth control, but her system was a bit of a mess for a while. We had more or less given up and decided that we would only have one child. Several months beyond our ideal “window”, she got pregnant. So our kids are a little more than four years apart in age. We had taken all the family planning classes and learned how to properly tell when ovulation occurs and all that, but the timing just didn’t work perfectly for us. Those are the breaks sometimes.

Now where exactly do you draw the line? If a player can’t leave to be there when their child is being born (and part of this is to be with their partner), what about if that partner or child or even one of their parents needs an operation or something else? Would you have not allowed Robert Horry any time off to be with his daughter? What about Derek Fisher? And what about all the times we hear of these athletes missing a game or two to be with their dying parent?

Just how cold and heartless do we need to be, to control these people to this degree? Sure, they are paid a lot of money to play a game. But they are still human, not slaves. We live in a more compassionate world than we used to. I wouldn’t want it any other way.

by Rodney Gustafson on Aug 16, 2010 10:43 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

We live in a more compassionate world than we used to ?

I donno. Have you heard about my NBA Forced Eugenics Program? GM’s of lottery teams will soon be drafting the rights to the DNAs of Lebron and D Wade. I just got to figure out how this whole baby making thing works.

by meatwad3 on Aug 16, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

voted no but meant yes

simply to disagree with bill simmons

Bat88m

by RyanRTE on Aug 16, 2010 12:07 PM PDT reply actions  

Jokes aside

Isn’t it legitimate? A regular season game probably isn’t a big deal, but a playoff game means a lot of money for a franchise. The owner pays a lot of money to these guys. I recognize the importance of the birth of a child, but don’t players have obligations to the franchise too?

by morg on Aug 16, 2010 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

It depends.

Male athletes, yes. Female athletes, no.

by Frisky on Aug 16, 2010 1:18 PM PDT reply actions  

no double standard!

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Aug 16, 2010 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tom, I think you are wrong about hippies.

I think they are pro ZERO POPULATION growth. At least the REAL ones are.
I am not at all sure WHAT the right wing liberals would do. I am pretty sure they would be upset to be called LIBERALS though.

I also realize that hippies and right wing liberals would probably freak out over that policy, so I softened it to saving child birthing for the off season.

by Natsthecat on Aug 16, 2010 2:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Also, I think there should be a caveat for any rules involving children when it comes to Batum.

I think he should be able to have as many kids as possible since they will have his genes.

by Natsthecat on Aug 16, 2010 2:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Rich relative to what?

Sans guaranteed contracts, are we even having this discussion? Miss two playoff games for the birth of your child? 30% less money for you next season.

We should keep in mind that this is all relative. As a white collar office professional in the USA, I make perhaps 100x a farmer in sub-Saharan Africa. A NBA players makes approx 100x my salary. We should be cautious creating expectations that we’re not able to live with were our middle class lives considered at the filthy rich end of the spectrum.

by Engineering Problem on Aug 16, 2010 5:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I KNOW IM SUPPOSE TO BE NICE.....

BUT ITS STARTING TO GET HARDER AND HARDER!

by socalblzrfan on Aug 16, 2010 10:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Getting close to equality here between men and women

boy how far we’ve come .

even though its technically illegal to discriminate and forbid any working person from having children, many corporations still discourage and discriminate against pregnant women working. Its nice to see that corporations are discriminating against men too, everyone wins, truly.

S

The Princess of Blazersedge

Twitter.com/sophiabiabia Follow Me!!!

" It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong" - Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Aug 16, 2010 10:53 PM PDT reply actions  

The FreeDarko book has a chapter about this, sort of:

It talks about how, before Tracy McGrady had kids, his field goal percentage was the same from game to game. But when he had kids, his shooting fell off badly on the second night of back-to-backs… like he wasn’t doing a good enough job balancing daddy time with rest time with basketball time.
So instead of Eugenics, which is essentially what Tom is suggesting, let’s just have a nice soft padded island in the tropics for the moms and babies to go to when there’s a back-to-back coming up.

“The NBA: where kids are OK… 1000 miles away”

by FlyingOutlaw on Aug 17, 2010 3:10 AM PDT reply actions  

nice

Born Naked

by Y5k on Aug 17, 2010 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Aww, man - look at the timing.

Take any sport’s off-season, shift that span to nine months later, you know what you have?
MOSTLY THE SEASON!
That’s just the way it’s gonna work out for a guy who tends most of his conjugal duties
when he’s away from his team, which is far more proper to me than birthin’ in the off-season.

In Texeira’s case specifically, do the math and he was “at bat” sometime in November: PERFECT!
Dude was celebrating his first championship after years of dominant play for losing teams!
He’d BETTER be gettin’ a li’l somethin’ that just might maybe hypothetically result in an August birth.
At least his testicles were fully operational – more than you can say about most sluggers from his era.

Do it! Do it! Do it 'til you're satisfied!

by QualityPie on Aug 17, 2010 7:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Hmm, maybe the sarcasm is a bit too subtle here?

I didn’t think so—I always expect sarcasm from TiH—but based on some of the responses, people seem to have been taking this seriously. Maybe Tom should have gone further and proposed forced sterilization for pro athletes? Maybe not. Some things just aren’t funny.

by VTDuck on Aug 18, 2010 10:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Statistically...

If Wilt Chamberlain was given time off every time a child of his was born, he hardly would of played at all. Between the conceiving and the deliveries he would of been a very busy man.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Aug 18, 2010 10:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Babies are born every second...

Due to overpopulation – i say no time off for baby birth watching until the world population dips back down below 5 billion.

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Aug 18, 2010 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

You can't mandate things like that and you shouldn't play moral judge & jury on Brandon Roy or any other athlete

The birth of a child is an important event in one’s life. It doesn’t matter if you make $10 per hour or 10 million dollars a year. These people are not just athletes, they are human beings too.

As for you calling out Brandon Roy. His family and how he created it is is nobody’s business but his. He is a great player and an upstanding citizen. That’s what is truly important.

by 1nbafanatic on Aug 18, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Tom, you're using better bait these days...

Lured in what, about a dozen fish with this one?

by Visionary2 on Aug 18, 2010 4:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, sorry about that.

I work in an office with only three other people. All of them conservativ, one of them ultra-conservative.

I unfortunately hear ridiculous things like this spew from them on at least a weekly basis, and they are dead serious. So yeah, I missed the sarcasm on this one.

suckered

by Rodney Gustafson on Aug 19, 2010 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

huh?

I really cant tell if he’s serious. I was crackin up the whole time. Sounds like someone needs a hug (besides Rudy)

by BlazerBaz on Aug 18, 2010 8:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Worst poll of all time?

How about a new poll ranking poll questions. This one belongs on the list of questions that really never should have been asked.

Everyone should get time off for the birth of their child. The only exceptions would be working emergency services people, and that’s only if they’re in the middle of a emergency.

They make to much money to take time off for family? Seriously?!?!?

by Str8Nutty on Aug 19, 2010 11:46 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for the reply

You and many others convinced me that it is wrong to neglect your wife and child, especially so soon after the child is born. Only a heartless bastard who does not care about his wife’s and child’s well being would go back to work on the day their child was born.

Case in point: OSU’s offensive coordinator Danny Langsdorf, went back to practice just 2 hours after his child was born. What a jerk if you ask me.

by tominhawaii on Aug 19, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great question Tom! I think...

…athletes make enough money, they should just pay someone to go be there for the birth. Game or not. It’s an awfully emotional event, and they need to have that emotion for GAMETIME!

In fact, they should pay someone to stand in for them all of the time. That way they could stay focused on basketball, without all of these family things getting in the way.

The nice thing about this is, it wouldn’t even end up being their child, so they wouldn’t have to feel guilty about not being there for the birth. They could just have one of their people send flowers and they could say, “nice job, buddy – hey, he looks just like you!”

He shoots, he SCORES! Yay!

by webted on Aug 19, 2010 1:32 PM PDT reply actions  

tom.......

the time a woman goes into labor until 24 hrs after birth is a no no. The 25th hour depends on the people payin’ the guy. I love basketball but not at that expense.

by 5mimi6 on Aug 19, 2010 7:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Blazers fans are amazing

You put this in any normal internet forum, nobody would get the humor, and there would be no witty responses.

by aimlessgun on Aug 20, 2010 9:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm