Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

There's "No Question" Nate McMillan Wishes LaMarcus Aldridge Was On Team USA

Photo

This afternoon, Portland Trail Blazers head coach Nate McMillan introduced his new assistant coaches at a press conference (more on the three additions soon).  McMillan is enjoying an off week from his Team USA assistant coaching responsibilities, as he spent last week helping head coach Mike Krzyzewski prepare for this summer's World Championships in Turkey.

"We're going to be a totally different team than the [2008] gold medal team," McMillan said today. "We're going to have to certainly make some adjustments because we're going to be really small. But we have to take advantage of the speed that we have and I think it's going to be an exciting time."

One reason Team USA is going to be so small is because Blazers power forward LaMarcus Aldridge -- who could have potentially started at center this summer -- decided to withdraw from the team to rest his body.  

Asked if he wished Aldridge had decided to stick with the team this summer, McMillan didn't hesitate. "Oh yeah. No question. There are opportunities there for him and I certainly think that experience is good for players. I remember that team -- the gold medal team in 2008 -- if you go back and do some research on that team, just about all of those guys had great years when they came off of that team and went into the NBA season. The experience to play with the best in the world, to represent your country, to play against the best players in the world, it definitely helps you."

McMillan said Aldridge's late decision to withdraw hadn't come as a surprise. "I talked to LaMarcus a few times about participating and he thought about it, but he had some commitments that were already in place which wouldn't allow him to play."

As for Aldridge's future with Team USA, McMillan said Aldridge "is in the program" but a gold medal in Turkey this summer could push the next decision further into the future.  "Hopefully next summer we take the summer off and we'll get ready for 2012. If we go and take care of business this summer then we don't have to do anything next summer and we'll just get ready for [the Olympics in] 2012."  

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Comment 57 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Somewhat in LMA's defense

With the injury to David Lee it underscores the fact that these guys are maybe putting themselves at risk. And maybe I’m being unpatriotic, but I’d rather we have a healthy LMA (and Greg and Brandon and even Nic) than see them put on the shelf and potentially unable to compete when the regular season starts.

I also heard that he wanted to spend more time with his young son in Texas, so it’s also hard to fault him for that either.

by nikolokolus on Jul 27, 2010 5:11 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Exactly

Plus, let’s give him the benefit of the doubt. He said in Las Vegas that his body needed rest. He played a ton of minutes at center and was the number option on many nights.

Any really, who can hate on a guy who wants to see his very young son? He said in Vegas that his son has changed and grown so much since he last saw him.

by mas1983 on Jul 27, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Free practice time

I’m a huge Aldridge supporter, but the more he does things like this that prove against him adding anything to his game, the harder it is to defend him later on. He needed the extra time in the post. Time to work on a back-to-the-basket game. High-level competition like this would’ve done him very, very well.

by DustinOD on Jul 27, 2010 5:14 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I think it's his decision to make.

And I think the Blazers should have hired a “bigs” coach LAST year. That would have also helped LMA’s game.
LMA missed only 4 games last year. Whatever he’s doing..I say keep it up.
He’s smart and will learn post moves with a coach like Buck.

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

you know you've had a bad injury year when

only missing 4 games means you should keep doing whatever you are doing in the offseason, no matter if it improves your game or not.

I love B Edge almost as much as I love B Roy and close to my love for B atum

by kengriffey on Jul 27, 2010 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who is this Coach McMillan from Team USA?

“We’re going to have to certainly make some adjustments

Who is this guy?

But we have to take advantage of the speed that we have

Seriously, who is he? I wish the Blazers coach had this attitude…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 5:21 PM PDT reply actions  

McMillan has always pushed for more uptempo basketball

And he’s always made adjustments, especially when there’s been injuries.

by mas1983 on Jul 27, 2010 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can only adjust so much, when your star player wants to slow everything down

I have to say the Blazers allowed 94 ppg all season scoring 98…

Post season with a more open attack (which played better for Phoenix) averaged about 90 and allowed 104ish.

Should have attempted to keep the slow pace, which you can’t do when you have 4 healthy bodies and a gatorade guy.

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Couldn't let this one go by...

This is what is so confusing and puzzling about Nate…

He often says we need to push the ball.
He’s often seen on the sidelines imploring his team to Run.
He installed the 20 second rule (get past half court in 4 secs).

He has fast wing players (Rudy, Bayless, Batum, Martell), one of the fastest gazelles in the league in LMA, a very capable fast break point guard in Dre, one who could be in Bayless…

So why are we down near the bottom of the league in pace every single year?

I think it’s because he also doesn’t like turnovers, and guys have learned that you won’t get pulled for not running, but you will get pulled for turning it over…

It just is inexplicable… I mean, he’s SARGE! If he wanted a running team, wouldn’t you think we’d have a running team???

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Heard Demopoulous was the big anti-turnover freak!!!

The announcers kept saying this during summer league when the Blazers were playing against the Clippers.

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

No defensive stops = not much running

I saw some running last March after Camby and Batum were inserted in the starting lineup

but the overall pace for the season was relatively slow, especially in Jan-Feb when Howard was starting at center and the interior defense was soft and squishy, like a jelly doughnut

I fully expect the team to play more uptempo with Oden-Camby-Przy patrolling the paint and Batum-Matthews ball-hawking out on the perimeter. Blazer fans can complain about Nate/Brandon and their slow pace for a few more months—there’s no way statistically to refute this criticism. I don’t think it will continue, because superior defense leads to transition offense and the Blazers haven’t played superior defense much (because they haven’t had the personnel to do it, other than at center) but the roster emphasis has changed to acquire defenders rather than wispy Spaniards, and I (for one) say “it’s about time”

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about Phoenix or Golden State?

Since there defense is notorious for not getting many stops, shouldn’t they be doing “not much running” either?

by mas1983 on Jul 27, 2010 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nate talked today about the L*kers/Celtics having "traditional" rosters

You know, the kind that has a legit center and a real power forward?

I’m so glad my favorite NBA team doesn’t play small ball with gimmicky lineups. They just don’t have much of a shot to advance in the playoffs. (The Suns will take a step back this year, without Stoudemire. So will the Jazz without Boozer)

I just hope the Blazers keep running big lineups out there and force the other team to match up to them. Pound the boards on both ends. Limit the opponent’s to below 45% FG shooting. Win the FT battle. The 2008-2009 Blazers were able to do these things, last year was an aberration because of Greg and Joel being out of the lineup. Since then the team has added Camby and Matthews, 2 strong defenders. It’s gonna be fun, and yes they will run whenever they have an advantage

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn't work though

Phoenix doesn’t get stops, but they give up a lot of stops. We would have crushed them if we had Roy and GO, and probably would have beat them if Roy, Camby, and Nic were full strength.

by HailOden! on Jul 27, 2010 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

probably would have beat them if Roy, Camby, and Nic were full strength.

Not probably, definitely. The Suns had no answer for Miller and Roy during the regular season, especially in Portland. (Sure, Phoenix won the game in March down there, but that was one of Portland’s worst-shooting games in a month)

Brandon just got his foot stepped on at the wrong time, and that was one injury the team couldn’t overcome on short notice. I was a lot less happy with the outcome of the Rocket’s series in April 2009, because Portland was at full strength and nearly pulled out game 4 in Houston. Against the Suns the Blazers did well just to win 2 games, considering how dinged up they were.

Sure, Phoenix’ coaching staff made better adjustments than Portland’s—but all they really had to do was contain Miller after game 1, and that wasn’t too difficult because there wasn’t enough firepower coming from anywhere else in Portland’s lineup, outside of Bayless. I’m optimistic that the three Bs (Bernie/Bob/Buck) will be an improvement over Dean and Joe in the post season

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Having a defense that shuts down an opposition's efficiency isn't always one in the same ...

as a defense that relies heavily on ball hawking and forcing turnovers. In fact, here are several examples of teams with different styles from last season. Pace doesn’t factor a whole lot into the equation, either.

Slow-Paced, Ball Hawking Teams w/ Good Defensive Efficiency:
Boston (23rd Pace, 2nd Opponent TOV%, & 5th Defensive Rating)
Charlotte (26th Pace, 3rd Opponent TOV%, & 1st Defensive Rating)
Milwaukee (20th Pace, 4th Opponent TOV%, & 2nd Defensive Rating)

Slow-Paced, Ball Hawking Teams w/ Poor Defensive Efficiency:
Detroit (29th Pace, 5th Opponent TOV%, & 26th Defensive Rating)
Philadelphia (21st Pace, 9th Opponent TOV%, & 24th Defensive Rating)

Slow-Paced, Non-Ball Hawking Teams w/ Good Defensive Efficiency:
San Antonio (19th Pace, 28th Opponent TOV%, & 8th Defensive Rating)

Slow-Paced, Non-Ball Hawking Teams w/ Poor Defensive Efficiency:
Washington (22nd Pace, 22nd Opponent TOV%, & 18th Defensive Rating)

Fast-Paced, Ball Hawking Teams w/ Good Defensive Efficiency:
Utah (9th Pace, 6th Opponent TOV%, & 10th Defensive Rating)
Oklahoma City (12th Pace, 7th Opponent TOV%, & 9th Defensive Rating)

Fast-Paced, Ball Hawking Teams w/ Poor Defensive Efficiency:
Golden State (1st Pace, 1st Opponent TOV%, & 29th Defensive Rating)

Fast-Paced, Non-Ball Hawking Teams w/ Good Defensive Efficiency:
Los Angeles Lakers (14th Pace, 20th Opponent TOV%, & 4th Defensive Rating)

Fast-Paced, Non-Ball Hawking Teams w/ Poor Defensive Efficiency:
Phoenix (4th Pace, 30th Opponent TOV%, & 23rd Defensive Rating)
Toronto (11th Pace, 29th Opponent TOV%, & 30th Defensive Rating)
Sacramento (6th Pace, 23rd Opponent TOV%, & 20th Defensive Rating)

http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2010.html

Portland, of course, was last in pace last season, albeit middle of the pack in both defensive rating and opponent TOV%. In addition, the team most similar to Portland was clearly Atlanta.

by AK1984 on Jul 28, 2010 1:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not convinced that fast pace = playoff success, anyway

L*A = 14, Boston = 23, Spurs = 19, etc

I’d like to see the Blazers in the mid-20s instead of 30, but it’s not like they “have” to be in the middle of the pack re: pace. Fans like to see running/scoring, but this tends to get shut down the deeper teams advance in the post season

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

We might get it across in 4 seconds...

But Nate also coached the blazers to be one of the most efficient offenses in the NBA. Which is nice, but it’s worked out that we tend to take a lot of shots late in the clock. It was the other “7 Seconds Or Less” theory, where we keep working for the shot until there are 7 seconds of less on the clock.

It is a bit conflicting, but I’m sure Nate will find a way to make some adjustments ;)

All day baby, all day!

by LMA All Day on Jul 27, 2010 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anybody know if the NBA lockout...

would prohibit NBA players from playing for Team USA in the summer of 2012?

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 5:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Team USA is different

NBA lockout won’t prohibit that

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

The CBA had better be over by then

or the NBA will be in dire straits

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ready for post-season

I know Aldridge wants to be around his kid, and that’s great. He’s getting paid a ton of money to play b-ball and well he should. Anybody in their right mind would want to play in the NBA and someone like me would LOVE to play anything for the USA. I am a vet of the army and Iraq war, it would have been way better to play a game/sport for the US rather than fight in a war, but I digress.

Aldridge has been known for being a fadeaway style PF, which is silly to me. PF that is 6’10 should not shy away from contact, he’s not a huge guy, but he should be big enough to atleast put up a fight. I think that doing this would have helped get his mind right early. Sure you have to worry about injuries, but it’s a risk you have to take.

NBA players=generally clowns who know nothing about the world

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:22 PM PDT reply actions  

really haven't been since the dreamteam days

with a few stars sprinkled in half-a**ing it until they got demolished and embarassed. Served ’em right

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

if you want to be the best, you don't pass up opportunities to play against the best

for a guy who underperformed last season, faded in the playoffs, and has publicly stated that he wants to be an All-Star and one of the best PFs in the game, passing on the opportunity to play against some of the best talent in the NBA this summer is simply inexcusable.

by rip_city_swagger on Jul 27, 2010 5:22 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

He plays against the best for 90+ games every year.

Let him rest. No injuries this summer.

Give the Olympics back to the college kids.

Matty Walker: You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man. - Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jul 27, 2010 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I can agree with that somewhat

He’s been durable so far, but nobody knows what will happen in a week, month, or year. Now if Greg Oden wanted to go…………………..

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

you are correct.

for everyone else who is saying LMA has the right to do whatever he wants in the summer: to you I say you’re correct too.

But if that’s the case, he can’t clamor on with false delusions and hopes that he will make the all-star game or be a premier PF in this league. He has all the physical skills and a silky smooth high release turn around that is virtually unblockable but seems to lack the will of the championship.

he’s totally different in demeanor, but does that remind you of any other blazer PF we had in the last 15 yrs?

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jul 27, 2010 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Makes perfect sense to me...

I mean, if you were LMA, and KNEW you were soft, and didn’t want to play the center against the rest of the world (big burly Russians, e.g.). And you knew you wouldn’t look good (for your next overpaid contract). And you have a new kid, which can be a nice convenient excuse. Why wouldn’t you take it easy?

(Not that I’m condoing it, at all, but I understand a lazy overpaid multi-millionaire not wanting to disrupt his vacation in Bora-Bora…)

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 5:31 PM PDT reply actions  

well, everyone else on the floor for USA basketball....

don’t seem to have a problem with it

Old adage: if you want to be the best, you have to beat the best

If Aldridge wanted to be the best basketball player he could – he would be there. I’m not condemning him for not going, but considering the already “soft” persona and underwhelming performance lately, his skipping it stands out even more

by rip_city_swagger on Jul 28, 2010 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

actually..one of the main reasons aldridge was selected to team USA

was his ability to spread the floor with his shooting and guard other shooting bigs because most euro bigs are shooters. Of course he was also there to help the senior team USA adjust to guarding shooting bigs.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Jul 27, 2010 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I say let him/blazers rest all summer

If I had my way he/they wouldnt touch a ball or bball court until training camp. Its a long season and we need our players to just get there healthy, with enough energy to last thru 82 games + playoffs!

The Dude: Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!

by cavejunctionblazer on Jul 27, 2010 5:31 PM PDT reply actions  

NBA stars may become MLB pitchers

In another few years each team with a few stars will take turns having games off. It will turn into a “star” rotation with the player being able to rest a day depending on the levels of sand they have in their private areas. Just a guess

by Greg Lenny on Jul 27, 2010 5:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Rest? Kid?

I thought he was helping Rebecca Harlow move down to L.A.

by Chris Freed on Jul 27, 2010 6:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Personally, I think it says a lot about LMA.

Anybody who wants to play against the world’s best, represent their country, and most of all improve their game would jump at a chance to play for Team USA. These things don’t seem to mean much to LMA, which honestly fits his perception. I don’t see a lot of drive and competitiveness in him and this definitely doesn’t help change my perception.

by Coastie07 on Jul 27, 2010 6:51 PM PDT reply actions  

if only judgment was so easily justified

unless we know what his prior commitments were/are – we don’t know anything about his motives

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jul 27, 2010 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's young and not hurt so don't know what health has to do with it. Or is he really,really tired from so many jump shots?

As far as family, not sure what you know that others don’t. Other players have families and get tired too, but for some reason they don’t pass up the opportunity. It’s his choice though, so it’s fine. I didn’t say it makes him a bad person. Those choices are what separate the champions though and show who care more about improving and winning.

by Coastie07 on Jul 27, 2010 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

he played injured through a lot of this past season, (ankles)

and if he says his body is tired then I believe him and think he’s doing what he needs to do to be 100% for the Blazers next year. He wants to play for team USA, it’s just not the right time. His commitment is to the Blazers and the fact that he is trying to get back to 100% for the team shows that he cares.
Just because he’s not playing for team USA doesn’t mean he’s not working out. And a lot of players did pass on the opportunity to play for team USA, have you checked out the roster? it’s pretty bad.

unlike a lot of the players on the team with kids, his son doesn’t live with him, he lives in Texas. So ya I think it’s super important for him to spend time with his family since he doesn’t get to see him like he would during the regular season.

#52

by bustabucket on Jul 28, 2010 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

What happened to LMAs work ethic?

has he plateaued? is his growth slowing down bc he isnt putting in as much work? I usually go to the games early just to observe warm ups and I dont recall with any regularity that LMA worked with Bayno using the big arm pad thingys that he did in previous years. If anyone did them it was Bayless this year.

"There was a time when this blog was for intelligent BASKETBALL fans. It has unfortunately become O-Live 2…" ~Ilikeemall

"Did they really expect me to bow down to Jesus?!?" ~Sophia
"At first glance, I saw a fairly unremarkable penis." ~Sophia on Greg Oden

by Philthyanimal on Jul 27, 2010 7:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Vance said the same thing

and Wheels said the assistant coaches have expressed frustration to him that LMA hasn’t been agreeing to do this "extra’ work anymore

I would not be surprised to see Marcus Camby start at the PF this year, with #12 on another team’s roster. Maybe Nate will give LMA one last chance to see how he responds to Buck Williams, but if Aldridge remains reluctant to grow and develop, he may become a WARP casuality

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

LMA strikes me as content now that he his overpaid contract

That’s what I think really separates him from Roy. Brandon got his contract too, but he has that competitive drive and hunger that LMA seems to be missing.

by Coastie07 on Jul 27, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Surprise

He needs to take the time to build his body. The guy got picked second in the draft and a contract later still doesn’t draw a double team. If we need an anchor for a trade for Paul I say we add Aldridge and keep Batum, (no question). Guy hasn’t shown me anything except that his demeanor is the same whether we win or lose.

by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jul 27, 2010 7:44 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Not a bad idea....

Except that contract wise LMA is the least attractive for New Orleans, since he’ll be a BYC among other reasons. As much as it probably makes sense skill wise, it’s very unlikely to happen.

All day baby, all day!

by LMA All Day on Jul 27, 2010 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

this^

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

why would NOH want LA?

they have david west…who is already better than LA. they want capspace…and that is something LA cannot provide.

"There was a time when this blog was for intelligent BASKETBALL fans. It has unfortunately become O-Live 2…" ~Ilikeemall

"Did they really expect me to bow down to Jesus?!?" ~Sophia
"At first glance, I saw a fairly unremarkable penis." ~Sophia on Greg Oden

by Philthyanimal on Jul 27, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

3-way trade

Cho is in the GM’s chair now, so thinking outside the box is not only possible, it’s encouraged

I like Toronto as a destination for LMA, and they have a couple of ECs to send to NOLA

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

We don't know what his commitments are

I think he will have a good year. Last year’s injuries threw everybody out of whack. LMA had to play many games with two injured ankles because there was nobody else. A lot of men’s bodies don’t mature until their late 20’s or early 30’s. He could turn into a rock. Ever heard of “old man strength?” Juwan was old and he had attitude! I agree he’s soft now and that’s frustrating, but what he does well, is shoot, deflect passes to cause turnovers, and run like a gazelle on the fast break.

Nate said today on 95.5 that the new coaching staff will look at new ways of doing things, and Buck will be a great influence on LMA. Buck’s blazers were a running team, not to mention Nate’s sonics. I think a team can be both a running team and a post up team. We have the players to do both. You take what the defense gives you.

The Bruce Lee style of basketball.

by davebball on Jul 27, 2010 8:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Boards dont hit back.

You mean the art of playing without playing? That would be sweet.

All day baby, all day!

by LMA All Day on Jul 27, 2010 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

nice

You saw “Enter the Dragon.” Bruce also said to move like water. Water can be soft and move around the defense, and water can also blast through the defense. LMA needs to learn the latter. Every defense has openings. If Nate’s new coaching staff, with their supposed experience, can help him recognize those openings, then we can win.

by davebball on Jul 27, 2010 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I heard Jerry Colangeo say he observes the American players don't put much stock in the World Championships, it's all about the Olympics.

I’m glad LMA is resting up. His priorities are to keep logging big minutes for the Blazers. And he’s one of the injury-free (knock on wood) workhorses along with ’Dre and Bayless.

by Dodoh on Jul 28, 2010 7:23 AM PDT reply actions  

I can find no better comparison than John Walker Lindh

First he spits in the face of Blazers fans by having the initials “LA” then he betrays our country, and dare I say our troops, by chickening out of Team USA. He should be deported from America for treason.

by tominhawaii on Jul 28, 2010 7:24 AM PDT reply actions  

 “I talked to LaMarcus a few times about participating and he thought about it, but he had some commitments that were already in place which wouldn’t allow him to play.”

How lame. Aldridge wasn’t aware of the Team USA schedule when he made those other commitments?

by lsjogren on Jul 28, 2010 8:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Who Cares?

What is all of this? No other major league sport tries to run two seasons – one for the real show and one for a group of nations that want to accomplish what? You don’t see the NFL or MLB madly critisizing their players because they don’t have a second season related to countries who’ve decided that their agenda – whatever it is, should be played out every summer after the real show when players play 100+ games. The first responsibility of these players is to their team and their franchise, and their families. This idea that we should sit here and try to make this a “patriotic” issue doesn’t wash. Somehow basketball players have been caught up in an endless season. If you’re any good, they expect you to play pretty much year round (with practice), every year until you are no longer good enough. We used to have Olympics every four years, now its 2 – better for the ad dollars.

Last year we lost Batum and then Fernandez early – and for extensive playing cycles. The operation Batum should’ve had in the summer came during the season.

And in the end, if the US had all of its top talent on the floor at one time – do you really have any question who would prevail. So what are we trying to prove?

I remember how the US and Russia used to dominate the Olympics – not because we were naturally better athletes – but because we had the coaching, money, training and the facilities. Now, the rest of the world increasingly imitates us, and our medal count is falling in direct proportion. After all – we’re all humans – and the country we live in has nothing to do with where we get that skill from.

Sure – it can be fun. But it proves absolutely nothing any more. Mac’s problem is he’s a basketball junky and doesn’t value what time off brings to the mental side of the game. No one can play year round at the very top mentally.

I’m a VN vet, my daughter-in-law was in Iraq, my family has been in every war right back to the Revolutionary War – but this has nothing to do with patriotism. So why don’t we stop pretending that it does?

by Eben Calder on Jul 28, 2010 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

you're going way too deep with it, and for a "who cares" post - yours is the longest

1) NFL players don’t get criticized because football’s not an international game – no international competition
2) MLB players do play in international competition
3) Olympics are still every 4 years, World Basketball Championships come in between – which is an Olympic qualifier
4) USA winning basketball is not a “gimme” anymore – since the Dream Team basketball has truly become an international sport, and the competition is higher than ever. The last Team USA was called the “Redeem Team” because we had been losing and needed to turn it around. It does mean something to win, it does prove something. (The alternative is saying "we don’t care if we win because it’s so easy for us – so other countries can go ahead and beat us in basketball? – don’t think so)
5) These guys don’t play ALL summer – they practice for like a week, play a scrimmage, and take a month off. Colangelo is the director of USA basketball – he knows they need rest and none of them would commit to playing if it left them with nothing in the tank
6) All the players on the Redeem Team went on to have great NBA seasons after that summer- obviously USA basketball didn’t ruin them
7) It’s not hard, grinding workouts for Team USA. These guys all get together, have fun, hang out, run some drills and stuff, scrimmage, and that’s it. They’re definitely not just sitting around resting, but it’s not like it’s a grind. And remember, Aldridge is what 26? He doesn’t need 4 months straight off

While patriotism is part of it, it’s not as big a deal as you’re making it out to be. The reason people (and apparently Nate McMillan) have a problem with him skipping Team USA is that LMA talks about wanting to be great and being an All-Star, and yet after a season where he didn’t really progress and majorly faded down the stretch and in the playoffs, he turns down the chance to play with some of the best players in the league. It’s more the mentality/attitude/approach than patriotism. For someone who already carried a “soft” reputation – it looks really bad. Look at Durant, one of the best players in the league, and he’s there, going hard, and getting better.

by rip_city_swagger on Jul 28, 2010 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm