Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

The Changing Perception of Brandon Roy

Are you just as much in love as you were in 2007?

Perusing comments and e-mails from folks around Blazer Nation I've observed a subtle, yet pronounced, shift in attitude towards Portland's star, Brandon Roy.  When Roy was Rookie of the Year and the team was on an upswing he could do no wrong.  Perhaps love clouded the eyes of fans but in most ways the grandiose descriptions of his effect on the franchise were accurate.  Roy was leading the Blazers out of the Dark Ages and into their next Renaissance, kicking butt and making clutch plays along the way.  Now, though the team is doing as well as ever (albeit having plateaued for a year after massive injuries) the perception has changed.  One hears disparaging remarks about Brandon's style of offense.  He's paired with Nate McMillan and tagged as the reason Portland hasn't produced more points.  His defense has come under increased scrutiny.  Folks are wondering openly why other guards supposedly can't work alongside him.  The point shouldn't be overstated.  The majority of the fanbase still loves and respects Roy.  But the winds of change are a-blowin'.

Part of this is predictable.  Long, long ago I forecast that Portland fans were going to have less fun and less unabashed love for their players and team as the winning total rose.  As the perceived stakes become higher each moment and every issue becomes more serious and tension-filled.  This is part of the joy and heartache of sports.  When the Blazers were winning 25 games per year Roy's play was something to celebrate for its own sake.  Now it's supposed to lead to more wins.  If the win total doesn't increase to the level fans expect individual play, especially that of the team's star, loses luster.  Brandon is getting paid handsomely now.  For better or worse, when salary goes up unbridled devotion goes down.  It's easier to empathize with the underpaid sophomore than the fat-cat senior.  Roy's injuries hobbled him last season, especially in the playoffs.  Those last, indelible images of an ineffectual starter are hard to erase until new stimulus comes forth.  Familiarity also breeds contempt.  The same awesome drives we witnessed three years ago elicit more polite applause than wonder.  Having seen dazzling plays from Roy many times before our response changes from, "How'd he DO that?" to, "OK.  What next?"

In reality, Roy is a better, more polished, more aware player than he was in his Rookie of the Year campaign.  He's able to pick his moments.  He plays off of teammates.  He looks more like a basketball player than a solo artist.  His production remains high.  You can count on him to put in points and keep pressure on the opposing defense night in and night out.  That said, his shortcomings are also plain.  He looks slower as opponents have become more used to his tricks.  His defense is mundane, sometimes poor.  His in-game domination can turn to good or ill.  Part of the reaction to Roy comes from Blazer fans having to accept limitations from a player who, in his best moments, looks completely unbounded.

To me the issue rests in a simple spot:  Brandon Roy is the only superstar-quality player the Blazers have or are likely to get in this generation.  From the moment he took the floor in his first Summer League game he was different.  LaMarcus Aldridge, Greg Oden, Nicolas Batum, Jerryd Bayless...nobody has approached him in style, carriage, or effect.  It's possible to win without a defined superstar in this league but it's rare.  Young teams have virtually no shot of pulling off what the veteran Detroit Pistons did at the turn of the century.  Greg Oden may be the weight behind the train but Brandon Roy is the engine.  If he's not chugging the Blazers aren't moving.  Roy's game is not perfect but it's both good enough and the best the Blazers are going to get.  Portland has to find a way to work through, not around, Brandon if they are to succeed.  Whatever people are prone to saying about him, he is the type of player who should make that easy.

What are your thoughts on Brandon Roy?  Have your perceptions of him changed over the past couple of seasons?  If so, how and why?  Is Brandon capable of leading this team to a title?  Would you ever consider trading him, as some have suggested in this week's CP3 flurry?  Weigh in below.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com) 

Comment 372 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Roy

I still like him, but yeah i’ve been one of the main ones on here criticizing him some, cause i do believe his style of needing the ball to do anything sucks to be point blank, i think he makes it hard for the Blazers to ever get a star point guard, maybe we dont need a star point guard but i think he complicates that and can seem a bit selfish proven how he handled the Andre Miller situation, wanted Blake to start just cause it suited his ball aways in hands game more, when we all know Andre wayyyyyyyyyy better then Blake and could help us win more. Roy is a star but i honestly think he should be a superstar, and i wonder will that ever happen, he has made strides yes, but i haven’t seen a whole lot of growth from season one to season 4, im just being honest, but hey thats just my opinion

by Blazingatrail24 on Jul 27, 2010 3:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

so...

would you consider Kobe’s game to be one that revolves around not having the ball in his hands? I’ve never know him to do much off the ball, and he’s at least one of the 3 best players in the league and essentially an iso-machine. (Despite all the raving about the triangle, the main function outside of setting up the post is appropriately spacing the floor to compliment the alpha-wing, ala Kobe or Jordan).

BRoy is imo the third best “2” after Kobe and Wade, fourth if you consider LBJ, so putting the ball in his hands is key. Your best player should have the highest usage. Now if we had CP3 or DWill at point, it would be a different story. But when LA is your second best player, well the ball needs to be in Brandon’s hands A LOT

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

The difference between Kobe and Roy

is that Kobe makes decisions much quicker than Roy. Part of that is systemic — the triangle vs the iso set. You are right: part of the point of the triangle is to free up your dominant wing players, such as Pippen and Jordan. The Lakers run that set, which allows Kobe to occasionally catch the ball on the move to attack the defense.

Portland’s offense, on the other hand, before we got Miller, typically involved Blake handing the ball off to Roy, isolating him on the perimeter so he can take his defender one-on-one. The goal then is to attack the rim or kick the ball out to a catch-and-shoot player at the three point line. It is a dramatically less dynamic approach.

Can Brandon Roy play with an up-tempo guy like Chris Paul (or Andre Miller, for that matter)? I think so. I believe he plays so slowly because that is the way Nate has taught him to play. It is relatively risk-free, and he is so good, that it produces good results. But a more motion oriented offense would free up Brandon to move more, and create opportunities for other players, as well.

My opinion of Roy has changed somewhat. I was critical of his handling of the Miller/Blake issue. I am very critical of his defense — he should be much better. But he remains a good leader, and should remain the focal point of the offense.

by hercher on Jul 27, 2010 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't forget

he’s still young, and still evolving as a leader.

Also, he played a slower pace than most guards at Washington (and it was one of the knocks on him coming into the draft). Slower pace doesn’t mean ineffective though. He’s very efficient with his possessions—more so than Kobe, much of the time.

If Luke Babbitt and Jerryd Bayless played a game of table tennis I'm not sure who would win but the ping pong ball would lose no matter what. - Ben 7/16/2010

by jamon51 on Jul 27, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

McMillan as the coach, should have been able to impart the importance of learning to

play with Miller (off the ball, slashing to the basket etc when need be) to WIN. McMillan is the mature adult. Also the HEAD COACH.
This is one of the knocks I had against Nate last season.
Phil Jackson made Kobe “knock it off”…and he also made MJ learn the triangle offense when MJ initially whined about this.
It wasn’t Roy’s job to know to do this when he is 25 and knew nothing else.
The coach is the one who needed to make Roy want to step out of his comfort zone, make Roy realize it was needed for the sake of the team, Roy’s body…
Roy did realize all of this LATER…but seemed to have to learn the hard way.

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I would argue that

while Kobe makes quicker decisions than Roy, Roy usually makes better decisions and is better at executing them. Kobe is and always has been something of a chucker. He just hits some amazing shots and is incredibly difficult for most teams to defend.

by HailOden! on Jul 27, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kobe has always adapted his game to the talent around him to some extent

I mean given that the talent around him was brought in mostly because they suited him.

His game has changed over the years.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

the blake miller thing

and the, I am just not sure how I fit in this new system stuff did mark the first major fissure that has led to changing perceptions…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

3rd.

Am adding that Roy gave an interview this summer which made me appreciate Roy more than I did this past season.

He stated (paraphrase) that it was easy for him to be the leader when he was unquestioningly allowed to do whatever he wanted to do. He realizes now that to be a good leader he needs to do whatever it takes to win. He’s working on his off the ball game, he said he knows he needs to play more defense. He has a trainer who is getting him to do things he’s never heard of before.

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Those are things that I like to see

While I don’t think quite as highly of Roy as I once did, I still think quite highly of him. In some respects, he reminds me of Derek Jeter. Always does things the right way, doesn’t make headlines or get in trouble. He is a very professional player with a tremendous will to win.

And based upon what you are saying, he’s willing to do whatever it takes to win.

Let us hope that Nate takes a lesson from his star.

by hercher on Jul 27, 2010 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

believe it when i see it.

been hearing these sorts of platitudes from Brandon for a few years now. his ability to parrot does not comfort me.

Actually, when he is ready to make a commitment to defense and being a leader, i would expect him to stop talking about it. that’s how doers do.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Jul 27, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

If "that's how doers do"...

Why’s you need to say it?

Brandon is a work in progress which is a positive thing in my book. There are alot of guys who after 1, 2 or 3 years in the league are what they are and will not be much more. I don’t think Brandon is one of those guys. I think he truely wants to improve.

Of course these are just my opinions but I also think that unlike some guys Brandon is sincere in his intentions. We all fall short of what we hope for ocassionally.

by Ilikeemall on Jul 27, 2010 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

They haven't changed

I still believe in Roy and his ability to lead us to the promised land. He is the only player on the roster I would pretty much never consider trading (baring something like Roy for LeBron straight up).

All you need to know to see this is how I and everyone else at the start of game 4 last season. When Roy came out, the spirits of the RG lifted approximately 1 million times over. No other player on this team can do that or likely every will.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 26, 2010 11:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I think you'll probably get a lot of heat from the Blazer Nation faithful...

you can’t tug on Superman’s Cape…
(crap, now I’ll have that song in my head for a week)

I would probably not rank very high on the “think less of” scale, because I’ve seen him as a borderline all-star level player, and not as a savior. So I never put him on that mountaintop.

I think Greg is the one that, when healthy, will lead us to the title… but Brandon is a very important piece of that championship team – the late game clutch shooter. Just as the defensive wing stoppers, and point guards, and… the rest of the t-e-a-m.

by Visionary2 on Jul 26, 2010 11:08 PM PDT reply actions  

What I've come to notice is that he set the bar so high.

So high, in fact, that he had trouble living up to it this past season.

"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."

by Arby on Jul 26, 2010 11:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Exactly

It’s a “what have you done for me lately” attitude.

Brandon Roy has a chance to be the greatest Blazer ever. If he gets us a ring as the leader of this team, he will undoubtedly be cast as that. But in my mind he’s already closing in on that title.

If Luke Babbitt and Jerryd Bayless played a game of table tennis I'm not sure who would win but the ping pong ball would lose no matter what. - Ben 7/16/2010

by jamon51 on Jul 26, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

he's on his way...

he doesn’t have to win a title, he just has to get us to the game. If he can do that once, and keep being an allstar every year, he will be the greatest Blazer of all time. If he can get us 6 titles and get 3 mvp’s while being an allstar every year and then retires to play baseball and then comes back to a questionable team and helps them to the playoffs but loses and then retires again and becomes part owner of another team. He will be the best player EVER!!!!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

does he need a stint in the MLB?

or maybe he can become an SAT tutor.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Jul 27, 2010 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

he does if

He wants to be the best player in basketball ever! that and all the other accomplishments are required!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

SMH

Unsubstantiated nonsense. His father had just died. I’ve also heard it was a drug suspension, but no one ever seems to have a shred of evidence for the blatant slanders.

Doesn’t MJ give people enough REAL reasons to try to knock him down?

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dunno

the Escondido Timbers has a pretty nice ring to it :)

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

exactly

roy would have won a title if he had all stars around him. Kobe’s Lakers were an 8 seed before they had Pau.

One man can’t do it alone. Roy needs Oden to come in and beast, and have LMA put in a full year of being an all star.

by prezofdeath on Jul 27, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

While Kobe is very good

I also think if you put in another good SG, such as Roy, the Lakers would still win easily. Pau Gasol makes that triangle go go go.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too bad

We have LMA and Not Kevin Love + The Triangle Offense.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kevin Love is a great passer

And if we got the guys who can teach the triangle, it’d be interesting to see, but even Phil Jackson needs Tex Winter to run it for him. I don’t know enough about it to know how tough it would be so use, but it sure seems tough.

With Kevin Love, I really like his rebounding and passing, and I think he’ll be a great regular season player. I think in the playoffs, once he’s matched up with the best PFs of the day, his size and slowness will severely limit him. I think they’ll go around him or shoot over him, no matter what he does, and there’s nothing he can do about it because he’s under 6’8" without shoes. He tiny!

Very skilled player though, very good passer. I like watching him.

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt the requirements are steep

His rebounding, passing & I really like his ability to hit the outside shot/be able to be efficient inside with his post game. You mention him being outmatched in the playoffs, I think he plays well enough for a great defensive team around him to more then make up for his lacking ability- Such as Oden. For instance I don’t see him any much worse then Aldridge. He needs to be in better shape, Walton was only like 210-220, if Love was that low he would be so much faster.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

While I think a perimeter player like Roy can be hid on defense (though it's far from ideal)

I 100% don’t think you can hide an interior player on defense, nor have a center cover his man AND the PF’s man. It won’t work.

Dwight Howard covers the interior well and has weak PFs next to him, but he’s incredibly mobile. I don’t think it’s feasible to expect a center to cover that much for a PF who will get abused.

It’s part of my problem with LMA.

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting note

if Phil Jackson retires next summer, Tex could be on the market. I would love to see him here and run it with Roy, Oden, and team…

by usmcr3049 on Jul 27, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

ALdridge coming out of the gate

with the same intensity he finishes the regular season with would be fantastic. His post ALl Star game attitude is so much better than his pre all star game attitude.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

completely agree!

When Brandon came back for the end of the series last year, everyone was drooling at our chances of taking it. then it turns out that he was just a little unhealthy still and couldnt quite do it…everyone freaks out and wants to trade him for Paul!?! Just plain whack!

This guy is a stone cold assassin and has won more games for us in the closing seconds than any other blazer i have ever seen.

what more could you want from your superstar? he takes the load with the game on the line…and DELIVERS!

He is a leader. He is humble. There is a reason the best defensive players in the league say he is one of the toughest players to guard in the league.

Who would they rather have? Joe Johnson?!!

by SuperFan #7 on Jul 27, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I love Brandon Roy

I don’t want him to be traded, I want his Jersey hangoing from the rafters someday as a superstar lifetime Blazer.
the offense should be keyed through him
he is uber clutch
he still needs to get somewhat better off the ball
he still needs to work on making that pass to the roller (he rarely if ever passes to a roller on the pick and roll, I really believe that is one of the reasons why Aldridge pops so much)
He still needs to trust his teammates more in the open floor
Those three things would help him as much as it helps his teammates…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ex-friggin'-zactly.

Everything mookie said explains perfectly why I
don’t immerse myself in the Portland fishbowl.
I have Suns friends who are bigger fans of Brandon
than plenty of Blazer “fans”.

James freakin' Rodgers. Beast.

by The Orange Joe on Jul 27, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm a Suns fan, and we'll take him.

This is kind of funny to me – we did the same thing to Amar’e. Familiarity does indeed breed contempt.
Roy is a stud, he’s a class act, and I’ve never seen him give less than 100% effort. He will continue to improve, because he’s smart.
He’d look good in a Suns uniform, too.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 27, 2010 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

My love for Brandon Roy is as strong as ever

and it will never diminish, even long after he retires. I have a Bayless jersey, Aldridge jersey and Oden jersey……I have 4 Brandon Roy jerseys (including a sick purple Washington jersey).

Brandon Roy IS the Portland TrailBlazers and he will end up by far as the greatest player in franchise history.

P.S. He is better than Chris Paul, so no, I would not do a straight up trade of the two.

by 64-18 on Jul 26, 2010 11:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I have seen 3 Roy game winners the last two seasons in person

Houston twice and the Wiz as well, I’m not going to say he’s better or worse than CP3 but he is special, period and my love persists.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 26, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hard to respect a guy

who won’t work on defense. And perennially whines at the ref.

That said, I have a lot of admiration for the skill and intelligence with which he attacks the rim. Clearly, he has worked long and hard to develop that skill.

Very good player. Until he masters the team aspects of the game, he will not be a great player.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Jul 26, 2010 11:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Seriously? Whines at the ref?

Have you not seen the other stars in the league? Come on man, that’s an unfair point to attack him on.

by thetsaiguy on Jul 26, 2010 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't care about the team

Dude is as unselfish as a star gets.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 26, 2010 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

He doesn't whine at the ref's...perennially

I do agree that he is screaming a lot more trying to influence the ref’s that there is contact and that get’s annoying to me, but last season he did make a comment about how all the super stars are on the refs all the time and he was going to do the same thing, and I saw a noticeable difference in his complaining or attempts to influence.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

when the ball is going up the floor, towards your basket,

I don’t care who you are, I want to see you get back on defense, not be jawing to the refs.

And no, I don’t see a lot of other players doing that as frequently as Brandon. Not when the ball’s in play.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Jul 26, 2010 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

agree'd

he needs to be in their ears between plays not during them. Like kobe and dwade, they are always gabbing to the refs between plays, but rarely hang their teammates out to dry.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats garbage

Kobe & Wade always give ridiculous looks/complaints to the refs

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

really no one?

lol do you watch basketball? or rather do you watch any other games besides blazer games… hell even the blazer games you can see everyone complaining to the ref. I saw nash do it only a handful of times in the games we played this playoff run….

oh wait, i get it, you are trying to get in an argument so you took… oh ok, got it…

thats the only logical explanation, and you know what, I fell for the bait….bravo

by bhrandon on Jul 26, 2010 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

seriously

it’s a huge problem all around the league, everyone does it and it’s not going to change. I don’t have a huge problem with it as long as it’s between plays and not during them failing to get back

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

don't think so.

anyway, that’s a minor point.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Jul 27, 2010 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

but not for you...

As you can’t even “respect” the man. Wow.

You're saying that they look like they're giving it their all. And you know why they look that way? Because they're bad, and it literally takes them the maximum physical effort to accomplish basic baseball tasks like throwing the ball from short to first. When David Eckstein throws the ball to first base, he has to wind up like a shot-putter, spin around forty-three times, and launch it at an angle 89 degrees from the horizontal. Afterwards, he undergoes an IV drip for a fortnight and he's so out of breath that he requires several months of acupuncture to regain the power of speech. For this we laud him. -Junior of Deadspin on 'scrappy' players

by TheOdenator on Jul 27, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

not the man;

the basketball player. I don’t know the man. so calm down a little!

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Jul 27, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

watching the same

game you are Blazin…I watched Brandon argue the call so many times while his team mates were running back down to the opposing teams basket at the RG…..lets see….still no call and one less person playing defense down at the other end of the court….and when Bayless started doing it …well….drives me absolutely crazy…

Is it November yet?

by debra31098 on Jul 27, 2010 6:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I read an article

That Brandon said that he was going to be more vocal about the no-calls. He said he looked at players like Kobe, Wade, and LeDouche and realized that’s what it takes.
Nice guys finish last in the NBA.

If what I just commented turns out to be wrong, please delete from all memory.

by NBAstard on Jul 27, 2010 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

you mean LeBron?

that’s pretty harsh considering he didn’t do anything to you

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting...

People jumped all over your “whine at the ref” criticism, but not the “won’t work on D” one.

I did lose respect for "BRoy the vocal team leader " this year. First, we heard comments about him “working on his off-the-ball” skills, and that he was “dedicating this year to defense” (paraphrasing, but this is what we were hearing last summer).

Then, when we get Dre, he starts talking about preferring Blake, and I don’t care how much you BRoy honks try to spin it, that was simply an unbelievably BAD statement to make publicly. No true team leader would come out and diss a new teammate like that.

Last year BRoy made several public comments (“the team needs me to get my touches”) that show he’s much more concerned with offense than defense, and his on-court behavior and positioning in the half court (waiting out by the 3 instead ofcurling around a screen) clearly showed that he wanted the ball rather than run off screens.

Then we start watching him play, and rather than ratchet up his D, he played far worse D last year than before. His close-outs to 3 point shooters were turtle-like. He was nowhere near as involved and in the middle of passing lanes as he was in years past (his steals per game slid below 1 for the first time in his career). I also don’t recall him spur his teammates on to greater defensive intensity. Instead, we hear comments like “the team needs me to get my touches”…

Yes, BRoy is a fantastic clutch shooter, and an integral PIECE of our championship puzzle. When healthy, his ability to break down a defense is very valuable But (IMO) he is NOT the franchise level guy that you build your offense around, to the detriment of the skill set of the rest of the players on the team. And his atttude, public comments, on court demeanor all show me that he has a lot to learn to become a true team leader.

As you said Blazin, until he masters the TEAM aspects of bball, he will not become elite.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

plus

lock down defense is not something your #1 offensive option can do at all times. that is why teams like to have a perimeter “stopper” who then can compliment the O by casting 3s. apart a handful of players in NBA history, top offensive options are not lockdown defenders.

and whos talking about defense…you couldnt even stand in front of Diener

by SuperFan #7 on Jul 27, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well said,I pretty much agree with your assessment.

which includes appreciating how good a player Brandon is. I do tend to fault the coaching who seems to fail to stretch Brandon to where he needs to go, rather than just load him up with responsibility and “build around” him. When I hear all this “Roy’s team”, “build around”, “face of the franchise” talk, it is a discouragement to me. All the super stars people love to list have has seasons of frustration because they didn’t have or engage the TEAM they need to be contenders. Too much star focus is destructive. And one of my big gripes with Nate is that he seems to be one of the worst star focussd offenders, rather than leading Roy to where he needs to go, he seems more like a buddy, confidence (ego) building short sighted (win today) cheer leader, failure as a coach. Let’s maximize ALL the players, coach. I think Brandon is a willing student who will respond to, and could use, effective LEADERSHIP to take his game, and team, to the next level. The Brandon show worked better when it was new, teams do adapt. We have to mix it up.
One of the thoughts that actually came into my mind in considering the possibility of a Roy/CPaul trade was that at least it would destroy the Nate/Roy symbiotic relationship that is holding the team back. Another Nate casualty.
As is too often the case, one of my biggest problem with a player is how he is used by Mr. Nate.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jul 27, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

agree. Nate didn't "coach" Roy last season, IMO. Instead of teaching Roy to see the

benefits of working off the ball and of learning to work with Miller as the STARTING point guard, Nate just let Brandon get his way. Big minus for Nate on that one.

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

wont play defense?

i was at the atlanta game 2 seasons ago when roy went shutdown mode on Johnson and even Nate said it was the best 1-on-1 defensive stand he had ever seen! blocking Anthony multiple times under the rim to win a late season game for playoff seeding 2 years ago. what are you talking about

by SuperFan #7 on Jul 27, 2010 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

the only legit knock on B's game

is his need to have the ball to be effective…but how many number 1 options can that be said about. I can say many more things about Anthony or Joe Johnson, or Dirk, or nash, or Kobe for that matter…need i go on? Kobe plays decent D but he more looks like he plays tough on the ball D, but really most times that he body’s someone, he usually gets burned…shoot, he even got burned by Rudy in the Olympics.

Roys not a big who will get you 3 blocks a game or 10 rebs, but if you have ever followed this guys stats you know that he gets you about 5 rebs, 5 assists and 20 pts, plus a steal and a block here and there. Not really sure what you are looking for?

by SuperFan #7 on Jul 27, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Patience.

I want it now too… but Roy can’t deliver it until the team around him is ready. Oden has to be healthy, LMA has to play some D, and the rest of the team has to really commit to Nate’s system on both ends of the floor. Roy may not have been his best last year but that is absolutely not why we didn’t win it all.

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm in no way saying Roy is why we didn't win it all...

My point is, unless BRoy and Nate work with the other guys on the team to establish an offense that has more plays than the BRoy iso, then we won’t win a title. If you want to see BRoy continue to scor 26/5/5, and see us watching other teams in May, then continue along the current path…

If you want to win a championship, learn how to build a team, and develop an offense that has more options than just the BRoy iso…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

But last year wasn’t the year to start implementing changes since Oden was out and the other players we now consider our core weren’t as established as they are now. If Nate can’t make changes to incorporate Batum and Oden this year… well, then I won’t be defending him anymore. Unless it works somehow haha

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, we were starting to see some new things from guys early in the season

and our offense looked a bit ragged at times because of it but Aldrdige spent more time in the post than he used to, Roy passed to the post more often (although still not the roller), little things like that. They were working on unfamiliar things and it showed.

Then the injury train got rolling and everybody basically reverted back to old habits to hang onto to hope for the season.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Roy is capable of very good defense when he’s making an effort. Unfortunately, last year he was terribly lazy closing out to shooters and fighting through picks. Just very little effort.

by jksnake99 on Jul 27, 2010 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

You are awesome Dave

this line sums up the debate as I see it:

Portland has to find a way to work through, not around, Brandon if they are to succeed.

Everybody currently sort of plays around Roy, we gotta figure out how to take advantage of their obvious talents through Roy. That is what it will take for the offense to gel. There are some things Roy can do to improve the situation (better movement off the ball will increase his effectiveness and give other teams more to think about when guarding him for example), there are tons of things the other players need to work out in playing through Roy rather than around him.

Once that puzzle is solved this offense should click routinely. We know it can, we have seen it happen. The Chicago and Memphis games last year were remarkable offensive displays.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 26, 2010 11:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Funny, that's one of the things I didn't agree with in Dave's post...

I really believe this attitude (our offense goes through Brandon) is one of the major failings of Nate’s offense. It may just be my old-school mentality, but typically when you have a 7’ beast in the middle, you play through the big man!

I truly believe that if Dre was allowed to just run a freestyle ball and player movement based offense, and we just told Greg: rebound, set a pick up top, roll and look for the ball, if not there, post up, then if you still didn’t get the ball, get ready to rebound… that Greg would be a 20/10 guy, and a dominant offensive force.

And he’s shown that he’s a good enough passer down low that he can kick it out (to, for example, a wide open Broy) when he gets double and triple-teamed.

So, in my mind, the Blazers have to find a way to work through, not around, Greg Oden if they are to succeed…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

He was out all year.

Lets see what Nate does when Greg is on the floor consistently. Early last season GO was getting to a point where Nate could trust him enough to run plays through him… and then he got injured.

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

there is no reason Roy can not facilitate a post game

playing off Oden and Dre…

Roy is the focal point that keeps the post from being too overcorwded for Oden.

Roy’’s usage ranges at about 30% or so (on par with other stars, lower than some but he is far more efficient than most), that is a lot of offense left to run a good inside out game. I agree an inside out, high post low post set should be a huge part of the blazers offense, but I also think roy’s abilities must be maximized in the process as well.

great teams mix that up…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 27, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm with you 100%

If we can get Greg the ball off some pick and rolls, and some decent post entry passes he will begin to really dominate, and greatly improve our offense.

(BRoy really needs to learn a good post entry pass from Dre, there’s a touch and trust required there that just isn’t there between BROy and Greg… of course, for that I mostly blame coaching…)

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great post Dave.

Yes, maybe objectively CP3>Roy. But as a Blazers fan, you have the obligation to reverse that equation: Roy>>>>CP3.

by thetsaiguy on Jul 26, 2010 11:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I heart Roy to death

awesome player, great dude, family man. What is not to like. Plus other players and coaches really respect his game, that says something.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 26, 2010 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is no such obligation. And Drexler was not > Jordan in this or any other universe.

I guess if you’re Mike Rice you can consider statements like Roy>>>>CP3 logical, but then again, I think Mike Rice is an embarrassing homer.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Embarassing?

Do you hide your head in shame whenever he’s on TV?

Stealth > Wealth

by 500dogs on Jul 27, 2010 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

no

I just turn on iTunes and turn the volume down. – Elgin

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Jul 27, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

he's awesome

nobody…and I mean nobody on tv mispronounces as many words, names, or otherwise as Mike Rice. Homer or not he’s a champ

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

One person's lovable goofball is another person's insufferable moron, I guess.

As a non-Portland resident and watcher of broadcast teams all around the league, though, I can’t help but cringe when Rice acts in ways more commonly associated with chronic drunkards.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

#7

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Jul 26, 2010 11:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Brandon isn't the problem....

I think what this past season and off-season has taught us is one person can’t do it on their own. I understand that as a team gets more wins and succeeds more, there are higher expectations and it snowballs. If Lebron couldn’t win it as the only star, Roy probably isn’t going to either. That is why we need some major improvements and contribution from other key players.

The golden rule has seemed to gravitate towards the “big 3” who is the 2 and 3 after Roy? When he is struggling who can we rely on to pull us through and give Roy more confidence and juice? LaMarcus? He hasn’t proven to be that guy, and everyone else on the team gets summed up as maybe’s or sort of’s.

We need another key player or two to help contribute as a “big 3” or “big 2”. That second or third guy may already be on the roster, but it may not. But to insinuate that Roy is the key, isn’t 100% accurate. It’s the second and third guy on every championship team that was the key, just ask Lebron!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Or Kobe

Kobe without Pau or Shaq=no titles.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 26, 2010 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

plus recent

reanalysis of Jordan’s other complimentary pieces show that they were, in fact, pretty good. He overshadowed them all, but in their day Kukoc, HoGrant, Rodman, etc were all pretty darn good players, it wasn’t like Jordan/Pippen and scrubs

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone who would assert

That Rodman was a scrub needs to turn in their credentials. I’d say Grant benefited greatly from playing his role very well, but was always considered to be a very good player. Never described as a scrub.

Kukoc, on the other hand, I think would have been hammered in this age. The modern stats plus internet analysis ad nauseum would have knocked him down a rather significant notch. Perhaps I’m wrong about that, as I’ve not actually seen much in the way of detailed statistical analysis of Toni’s game, but he was not close to All-Star caliper or anything like that.

I think Ron Harper was pretty darn good, as were John Paxon & Steve Kerr.

But the Centers? Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, Bill Cartwright… those are adequate place fillers at best.

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

But he had them

and he has his rings. So if Paul Allen wants one get that star.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 26, 2010 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

This isn't MLB

He can’t just buy his stars, would that he could.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jul 26, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

well he actually can

because Chris Paul is clearly available, and if they’re serious about winning titles, do what it takes to get him.

by 64-18 on Jul 27, 2010 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

judging by your tone

you must think that the Blazers brass don’t realize this and have just rolled over and died? Last I heard we’re the front runners but you have to realize NO is reluctant to just give up their franchise player, especially when their team’s existence in NO is being threatened. I doubt they trade him…and it won’t be on us it will be on them.

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Would never seriously consider trading Roy for several reasons:

1. He’s awesome.
2. He’s humble.
3. He’s got all the heart you’d ever ask for.
4. He makes other players better through all of the above.
5. I (heart) him.

facebook.com/year5000

by Y5k on Jul 26, 2010 11:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Brandon Earned His Cash.

And Knowing his work ethic we all know he will do everything in his heart to earn it-Thats all I ask. Roy is not the problem with this team I am finding myself increasingly annoyed with Aldridges softness though. I am not 100% certain Aldridge will respond well to a big $ deal like he got.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 26, 2010 11:22 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm also concerned that LMA won't respond to Oden receiving even more touches, next fall

If you look at LMA’s stats, he’s averaged 15 attempts and 7 makes a game for the past 3 years. Just like clockwork.

I can just about guarantee you that he won’t receive that many opportunities this year, unless the frontcourt is snakebit with injuries, again

How will Aldridge respond? Will he work that much harder on the other areas of his game, or will he float around on the perimeter and leave the heavy lifting to Oden, Przy and Camby?

I’m hoping that Buck Williams can reach him, because if not the Blazers are going to have a well-paid, very-average PF in the starting lineup

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I hope we increase our pace enough...

to give Greg his touches, BRoy his touches, and LMA can still get his 15 shots…

If we just ran the dang break once in a while, we’d generate enough new possessions to keep people happy with their production.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

really?

you think LA’s $65/5 looks that bad compared to $100/5 for Amare or $80/5 for Boozer and $80/6 for David Lee? The only better deal recently is probably Scola’s ($47/5), but he is loyal to Houston and he’s already 30

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

My opinion of Roy leveled out when I expected 30 point games every night, didn't always get them,

and it bottomed during the playoffs when he had a sub-par series (obviously mainly because of injury). But when I step back and give it some time I remember how good Roy is and how he is most definitely our franchise player.

by collectiveshane on Jul 26, 2010 11:24 PM PDT reply actions  

I always felt his style of play encouraged the other guys to stand around too much

and the coaching staff was never able to fully address that…hopefully the new assistants can sort that out.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 26, 2010 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

on the players

When they just stand around and watch him, that’s on the players, they need to move around. Its tough when we run so many iso’s, but there is no excuse when no play has been called and he is trying to make something happen and they just stare at his dreaminess.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

mmmm Brandon Roy's Dreaminess....

I agree, that is why daves line about needing t figure out how to play through and not around Roy is the perfect description of the problem.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 26, 2010 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

he has a lot of dreaminess!!

I think it would help if Aldridge wasn’t a bowl of jell-o if he bulked up and actually went to the hole, our team would be different. He occasionally pivots and goes to the hole and it’s money, but he doesn’t do it nearly enough, I’m super tired of the fade away jumpers. Just turn the other way and go to the rim!!!!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

in LMAs defense

the roller never gets the ball from Roy (that is the one other thing I would like Roy to work on a little bit), I would pop too.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jul 26, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Andre got it to him now and then

It’s just a habit he has to relearn.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jul 26, 2010 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

we need a power forward

and right now he’s a tall forward, there is no power to his game, when he’s on the break and once in a blue moon he throws it down hard, but why he doesn’t do it in traffic I have no idea. He’s a headcase, I read one of quick’s articles when he was doing the locker room series and was talking about the unspoken imaginary diss that aldridge thought roy did to him. It showed me he is a crazy headcase that creates situations that aren’t there and gets pissy and tight lipped, kind of like a woman…

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good take

Dridge is soft IDK if Blazers can win a ship with him starting.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I know right?

hopefully that’s the reason that they brought Buck in here, to teach LA a few things. I hope we see a bigger more buck like aldridge this season!!! here’s to crossed fingers.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt.

If he is still soft at the deadline I say we at least listen to the offers. Heck I’d rather have Gerald Wallace play the 4 !

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

no brainer!

I kind of despise the guy, but it would have been awesome to have an amare type pf, doesn’t put up with anything and takes it strong to the hole and can still have the touch from outside. Hate the guy, but love the game and it would have been cool to see in a blazer uni

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt.

Gerald Wallaces game is championship conducive. Its a shame he is wasting his years in Charlotte.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Couldn't disagree more.

Wallace is fun to watch, but he doesn’t take care of his body (and therefore gets hurt a lot) and his game is predicated on chaos and opportunism rather than method, system, and mecilessness. He could be a bench contributor on a champ team, but not a scoring option starter.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right

You’d rather have LaMarcus “Charmin Soft” Aldridge playing for us.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

While your logic is impeccable, I'm going to say yeah, I'd rather have a super-consistent, near-unguardable, barely-ever-injured LMA as our third option.

Of course, if Oden never pans out and LMA stays our second option, we’re not contenders. But that would be just as true if we substitute Gerald Wallace for him, so the point is moot.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

When you say "second option,"

do you mean on offense? Because I don’t see Oden being a reliable force on the offensive end for some time if ever. The way I see it his importance is predicated on solid D and superior rebounding. He has some post moves and his ridiculous physicality allows him to take advantage of some match ups, but his half court offensive game is far from polished or reliable. He seems to mostly rely on offensive rebound putbacks and thunderous dunks off of dishes when we get guard penetration.

by ripcitychamp on Jul 27, 2010 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

You hit the nail on the head:
thunderous dunks off of dishes when we get guard penetration

…and I’d add PICK AND ROLL. I mean, have you SEEN Tyson Chandler mop up on CP3 pick & rolls? And he’s not even good. Seriously. With a p&r point guard, GO can be a serious offensive force.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 5:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Greg won't become a force until we get him the ball!

Yes, Greg is raw down low. But he certainly improved last year, and I expect more improvemen this year. But how do you improve? Practice, repetition. Let’s get the big man the ball!

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t see Oden being a reliable force on the offensive end for some time if ever.

He was, last December

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

his game is predicated on chaos and opportunism rather than method

This sounds like a desciption of Jerome Kersey

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

A little, yeah. And he was a third option at best. Maybe fourth.

LMA is definitely a superior player, as much as I love Kersey.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

If LMA has a 10 year Blazer career

I suspect he won’t advance past Kersey on the 50 year anniversary team

Jerome had a motor that wouldn’t quit, LMA is like an English sportscar, you spend more time tinkering with the engine it than you do out on the road

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

That analogy is as broken as Jerome Kersey's post game.

LMA is NOTHING if not consistent. He’ll give you 18 & 8 on about 50% shooting game in, game out. He won’t shoot a lot of FTs, he won’t bang, but he plays pretty good D on rangy forwards and has a shot nobody—I mean NOBODY—can alter. Plus he may well be the fastest 4 end to end in the league (not that our offense takes much advantage of that, but still…)

by Marvin100 on Jul 28, 2010 2:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

In other words, LMA = Mychal Thompson

And where does Sweet Bells rank on the Blazer’s all-time top-40 list? I only know it’s lower than JK

At least Mychal average double-digit rebounds for 1 season in his career

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not really

It’s a legit comparison. Thompson was draft #1 in ’78. He had a steady career in Portland with similar stats as LMA. Mychal had to play more center than PF because of injuries to Bowie, Kunnert, etc. Blazer fans and Jack Ramsay though he was soft (and he was, especially when Moses Malone came to town…)

Ask any oldtimer, the parallels are eerie. BTW, the Blazers improved after MT was dealt to the Spurs

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

it bottomed during the playoffs when he had a sub-par series (obviously mainly because of injury)

I really think that a lot of fan pessimism about the current backcourt and the team’s chances in general is due to the untimely knee injury to Roy, last Aprill 11th. Up until that time the starting unit with Miller-Roy-Batum-LMA-Camby was playing extremely well, and they were headed for the 6th seed and perhaps even a shot at #5. But once Artest stepped on Brandon’s foot the air got sucked out of the team’s sails, and nagging injuries to Camby and Batum also contributed to their lackluster playoff series.

It’s to the team’s credit that they took a very hot and motivated Sun’s team to game 6, even though Roy had no lift or timing and the frontcourt was depleted by injury. I think this bodes well for the team’s future. I especially like what I’m hearing from Roy, when he says things like “being a leader means not getting your way all the time” I think that Brandon has heard some of the whisperings that Dave mentioned and (while the criticism probably stung, at first) he’s figuring out a way to be “the man” as well as a good teammate, at the same time.

As far as Roy’s defense goes, I think that it had to be tough to defend NBA guards after his hamstring pulled, and he probably never was “right” after December. Still, he had some very effective games (along with Miller) after the all-star break, and there’s no reason to believe that the 2 of them can’t return to the high level of play that they achieved before his knee injury. I especially like how Brandon and Andre can exploit mismatches against small guards when they’re both in the lineup. If Batum develops his back-to-the-basket game this offseason, the opposing PGs will have nowhere to hide, on defense

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 7:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Its Roys team

Lets build around him. Do everything we can to make him successful.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 26, 2010 11:25 PM PDT reply actions  

No, its NOT!

It’s a TEAM! Roy is one member of that team! Yes, let’s do everything to make the TEAM successful – not one player!

I mean, this attitude makes me think Portland fans just want to be entertained, have a thrilling game winning shot once in a while, be competitive, and we’re all good…

Well, maybe it’s because I’m from the East, but I think that attitude sucks! If you want to see a championship parade in Portland, then it looks like the entire city has to be weaned of their “BRoy is god” obsession, and start learning what a real TEAM looks like and acts… (Those fans around in ’77 know what I mean about a team-first attitude).

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Teamwork works better when role players know that they're role players.

Brandon as the man is part of a team-first approach. It’s easier for players like Batum, Aldridge and Oden to be effective when they know that their job is to make the simple, correct play. Defend. Rebound. Run the floor. Take the open shot, exploit a mismatch if it’s there, make the right pass. Brandon has to try to be the hero; everyone else just does their job.

by zopa on Jul 27, 2010 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Lakers are Kobe's team

Kupchak brought in players who fit Kobe’s style of play, and Phil Jackson’s team concept. They won the last two chapionships with a “Kobe is god (and a rapist)” obsession. I get your desire to see some old-school teamwork because the flow of offensive basketball in the 70s and 80s was beautiful to watch (I wasn’t alive yet, but I’ve watched old games), but the game has changed. Iso plays are the current NBA style, and we’re lucky to have an excellent Iso player in Roy. Building around him is the way to go. Oden and LMA have the potential to be the perfect complementary stars, they just have to live up to it.

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Roy brings more then talent

One of the things Brandon brings is more then what shows up in the box score. I think Brandon was just as umcomfortable with the culture that was present when he first came on board as a good portion of the fans. Roy has become this teams leader and goes out and tries to lead by example – I think the criticism that came this past year is due to what appeared, right or wrong, to be some struggles when Andre came on board. I think Brandon did some growing up this past year. He is the face of this franchise and it would be wonderful to see him win a championship some time in the near future.

by KevNW on Jul 26, 2010 11:29 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I keep one reminder whenever any doubts of Brandon's ability comes up...

…He dropped 42 against Ron Artest & Shane Battier in his first playoffs series.

Brandon never ceases to amaze and ranks second to only Kobe (though I hate to admit it) in clutch play in the NBA.

He’s not perfect. But too often he comes pretty damn close.

(do when you fumigate, meaning in bunches) - Rudy Fernandez

by MikeIrish on Jul 26, 2010 11:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Brandon Roy is a smaller modern version of Larry Bird

Of course the positions and size are all wrong but don’t laugh. He can shoot off balance just like Larry did and he’s got that tenacity too. Defense was equally bad – at first. It’s a stretch I know, but nobody thought Larry Bird was a “real” superstar at first either. He’s definitely the best for miles around.

by oregonslee on Jul 26, 2010 11:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Rebounds will improve with defense and general off ball play

I’m convinced in my bones that Brandon is a special player; a signature player.

by oregonslee on Jul 27, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who out there is better

as a SG? Kobe, can’t argue with the titles as much as I’d like to, and Wade…..27 of the teams out there would grab B Roy as quickly as we would like to get Chris Paul. Roy has in my opinion one weakness in his game and that is effective movement without the ball. As the season went on, and he got used to Andre Miller, he did better at that. I think that if Oden is healthy, and his presence allows Aldridge to play off of him, playing his strengths, and if we get the outside shooters that perform consistently, we may already have a “big 3” and have a shot at a deep run this year and a title in the next 2-4 years. We are like sacramento (where I lived for 7 years), a small market with nothing to do except dissect our stars and obsess over their weaknesses

by yubaduck on Jul 26, 2010 11:33 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Yup

A common argument I’ve been hearing for making a roy for paul trade is that Paul is the best at his position. Well….look at the two guys in front of Roy; Kobe and Wade. And I think most people would agree that they’d rather have Wade and Kobe on their team than Paul.

Roy is a fantastic player with flaws. His biggest flaw is defense. And Blazers have done a fantastic job of covering that by drafting Batum and Oden and getting Camby and Mathews. I respectfully disagree with our new GM, Mr. Cho when he says we are not a championship team as currently constructed. I say we’re ready now for a title!

by Sabasdaman on Jul 26, 2010 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ready now?

As currently constructed? be honest. You’re after Rice’s job, aren’t you.

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

You missed Roy's BIGGEST weakness

He floats around and doesn’t consistently commit on D. Watch the tapes—he misses his assignments several times a game.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

He gets so lazy on defense

It’s frustrating.

There’s no physical reason he can’t be a good defender. But, he uses it as rest time.

Hard to be too mad at him since he carries us on offense, but still.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thats why with Roy

We have to surround him with defenders to make up for it.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure

We need strong interior defenders and other good perimeter defenders so we can hide Roy on defense.

Still would be much better if our leader set the example. In a perfect world, it’d be that way. All stars coast from time to time on defense, but they often still show up more often than not.

Roy can do it, and should do it.

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I hope he does

I know if I was playing on defense as a star player I would not got 100% until the playoffs. We know Kobe doesn’t.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah :-(

Kobe can coast on defense as well, but he still makes much more of an impact than Roy does on defense. He steps up to the challenge of playing tough defense when the team has needed it, though I do think he is OVERALL overrated on defense since he doesn’t keep that intensity up all the time.

Kobe gets beat. He can coast.

But, he also can rise to the challenge and play great, active defense. Roy has at least show he can do it more than just sporadically, like the lockdown D on Joe Johnson a few seasons ago at the end of a game.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't forget, Roy's legs were not 100% last year

hamstring, then knee. He’s supposed to be in the best shpae he’s been for awhile, right now. Hopefully that will result in more activity and committment on the defensive end of the floor

Matthews and Batum always defending the SFs will help as well, Roy should see fewer size mismatches than he has in the past 2 years

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kobe also gets away with more than Roy

Not saying Kobe doesn’t do anything good on D, because that’s ridiculous. But a lot of fouls don’t get called on him. Roy gets star treatment too, but no one gets as much as Kobe.

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bingo, Morty!

You’re 100% right, BRoy rests on D, so he can conserve his energy on O. And why is that? Because our entire freakin offense is “give BRoy the ball and get out of his way!” Of COURSE he’s tired, and needs to rest on D!

If Nate would only instill a non-BRoy oriented offense, not only would our offense improve simply by becoming less predictable (again, thinking playoff offense here), AND his D, and therefore our team D, would improve.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think you're right

But I think Brandon will address this. He’s committed to being great and he’s going to become a much better defender. I think we’ll see a difference this year.

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oden, BRoy, Aldridge, and Batum are going to win us a championship

Oden will be the anchor
Roy will be the consistent engine that just keeps going and going
And Aldridge and Batum will be the gunners on the sides that will be the final blow if the other team wasn’t down already.

by Sabasdaman on Jul 26, 2010 11:36 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

there are a lot of if's in that line up

if oden stays healthy for longer than a quarter season, if aldridge can bulk up and take it to the hole, if the coach plays batum enough, if roy can stay healthy, if all the players can do something other than watch roy… not sure if I’m comfortable with all the what if’s…

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good dialogue

We have good parts but the sum may be lacking. I would like to see a little more tinkering though not to the extent of gutting the team for Paul. Roy can definitely stand to get some help from the PG position but he can also stand to help himself off the ball and on defense.

by oregonslee on Jul 26, 2010 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

the need

we need Steve Blake, or someone like it. He was perfect with Roy. Anyone who says different isn’t watching. He can bring it up and create at times, but most importantly he was a serious threat from deep and when Roy had the ball players would have to stay with Blake otherwise he would punish them with the 3, Andre can’t even dream of hitting 3’s and he is Roy 1.slow. We needed to get Ridnour or someone similar.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Darren Collison

Shot 52% from 3-pt. land in college and 40% from 3-pt. for the entire last season in the NBA.

But wait, it gets better.

As a starter in 37 games last season, he shot 49% from the field, 43% from 3-pt, and 85% from the charity stripe while throwing down averages of 18.8 pts., 9.1 assists, 3.5 rebs, and 1.8 steals per game.

Hence, all of the talk about Collison as a “plan B” instead of CP3.

by hkphooey on Jul 27, 2010 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

He was perfect with Roy. Anyone who says different isn’t watching.

And anyone who says that Miller and Roy aren’t a strong NBA backcourt wasn’t watching the Blazer games in March

Why not let Miller create and Roy shoot the 3? The 2 of them can take turns abusing the opposing PG down low. It worked very well, and it will work again

Steve Blake is a L*ker now, and the team was not going to advance in the post season with the Blake-Roy backcourt. Blazer fans need to let that old formula go

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

There are a lot of ifs with other teams too

Lets take the Lakers for example. The Lakers will win a championship if Bynum can stay healthy, if Kobe can stay healthy, if Artest can stay sane and play within the flow of the offense.

Let’s take the Miami Heat. The Heat can win a championship if Bosh and the rest of the Miami frontcourt can play something resembling defense, if Wade and Lebron’s egos don’t clash, if Wade and Lebron can hit their jumpshots….you get my point.

Now, what I like about the Blazer’s ifs are almost all of the ifs the Blazers have goes “if ____ can stay healthy…” Now this is the best if to have because it is something that is out of the players and coaches control. I believe last season was a fluke and everyone will start to see how special this Blazer team really is this year. So, I’m going to leave out the qualifiers and the ifs and just say, the Blazers are going to win the championship.

by Sabasdaman on Jul 27, 2010 12:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

You know whats gross.

Lakes make a few moves that resembles them dumping cap & they sign Marc Gasol next year.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

you heard it here first!
the Blazers are going to win the championship.

Mark it down, if the Blazers win it all in June, Sabasdaman should receive props and kudos!

Hopefully soon, more and more Blazer fans will feel this confident and optimistic about the current roster

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

this is not to say that Cho shouldn't be trying to add those "final pieces"

but there should be no hurry to make a deal “just to make a deal”

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Lakers just won a championship

and bynum wasn’t healthy, kobe wasn’t healthy, is artest ever sane? and odom was all over the place. not a great example

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

roys very good,

can you build around roy. he is so slow paced, has to have the ball in his hands, mediocre half caring about defense at times. he is probably tough to build around. its above my head. as hardcore a blazer fan as i am i still am not stupid. if i could get a starting allstar for a bench guy allstar id do it in a sec. also i think there are more risks to his body than have been let on and will perpetuate with his style of play. as a lover of placing blame somewhere, when all is said and done i dont think Roy will necessaryily have anything to do with whether or not we are sucessfull during the Roy era. Hopefully cho will change things but management has blown alot of opportunities the last few years. dont tell me ptown with pa will never draw any bigtime guys. first we have to establish ourselves as perenial winners and bring a level of toughness year in and out. i think players will respect that. i think mgmt has more to do with than any 30+ pts roy may have by cutting down on mistakes and lost opportunities. we have taken character alittle to the extreme and it is important but id like to see a focus changed alittle towards toughness and win or lose, pounding the crap out of our opponents on any nite. not to mention!!!!! other than 1 or 2 isolated games in the playoffs, we have never shown up. all the good teams step it up, eliminate turnovers, errors, seemingly make every shot, when the playoffs arrive they automatically step up their game. to date i havent see that out of the blazers on a consistant basis in the playoffs by the blazers and dont give me any unfortunate matchup excuses, houston and phoenix looked pretty favorable untill we got beat up.

by Captain fruit on Jul 26, 2010 11:38 PM PDT reply actions  

You're right that playoff results >>> regular season results

For the Blazers to start attracting quality veteran FAs, they need to win a playoff series or three. I think they’re capable of this, if the current roster can only stay healthy. I’m also encouraged by the recent changes in the coaching staff (with the sole exception of losing Monty)

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

any time a star has issues, such as Roy - the love takes a hit pretty quick

just consider Chris Paul. Two years ago, he was universally acknowledged as the best point guard on the planet. One injury season later – the pundits have already moved on (D.
Will being the flavor of the month with his playoff success) and even the fans have tempered their love.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jul 26, 2010 11:39 PM PDT reply actions  

better PnR defensive schemes should help the big men

Ociepka will be responsible for this

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

As many above have said, I still heart Brandon Roy.

When I think of Roy, I think of that stretch in December-January when he was fully healthy and was just stomping on everyone. The streak of however many 20+ point games…that was the real Brandon Roy. The rest of his season was injury-marred, and in my mind doesn’t count.

Roy got better at playing with Andre. A full year together will have them clicking much earlier this season. Brandon has expressed the desire to get better at playing off-ball and to work on his defense. That’s all I want from him.

He’s the best player on this team, and I want him in Portland forever. I can’t see trading him, because his face-of-the-franchise status is so cemented, and I’m sentimental like that.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jul 26, 2010 11:51 PM PDT reply actions  

If he does what he says this summer...

then I too will be happy, and the Blazers will be much better..

He HAS to learn how to work off the ball for us to be able to vary our offense enough to win a title.

And he HAS to play tough D, and make it a focal point, and lead his teammates to that goal.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

The hamstring and knee injuries made him look vulnerable

but without those injuries, the guy is nearly unstoppable and plays with a determination that rivals almost any superstar out there. We’re kidding ourselves if we think he’s not the best thing that’s happened to this team since Clyde. I think the main thing that keeps him from reaching Drexler’s greatness is the lack of creative passing. Watch any old Blazer classic game and you’ll see Drexler create easy baskets for Buck Williams and Kersey time after time. I think Roy has it in him however and he is the guy to lead this team.

by jlclark4u on Jul 26, 2010 11:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Watch any old Blazer classic game and you’ll see Drexler create easy baskets for Buck Williams and Kersey time after time

Those Buck William’s highlights in the other thread were awesome! I had forgotten how unselfish all of those old Blazers were, back in the day. That’s a good argument for keeping the core players together for 5 years, because they all had that “eye-contact” communication and “no-look synergy” not just Clyde. But clearly Drexler was on another level as a penetrator/passer

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

i basically see it this way

two years ago, he ended in a bang even if the team ended in a sizzle. he went out playing great playoff basketball and playing at a high level. the years before that when the blazers weren’t in the playoffs he again ended strong. the point of this is the common saying, “you’re only as good as your last game.” not a lot of people are going to keep in mind his body of work. his 41 points on xmas day versus the nuggets on christmas day the fact that he made the all-star team again, winning buckets against the knicks and so on… so the fact that he went out this season on a low note and clearly was not even playing to half his skill, will keep peoples eyes covered to the fact that he still had a good year last season.

by maven on Jul 26, 2010 11:55 PM PDT reply actions  

I love Brandon Roy

He’s the Portland Trail Blazers. Our best player.

Easy top 10 player in the league, good scorer and playmaker, able to play good defense in spots but it’s obviously the weakest aspect of his game… he’s a superstar.

Oden might be the most important player, in my opinion, but Brandon Roy is the best player.

Roy had hammy problems holding him back, but those will go away. I don’t worry about the knee. He is one of the best players in the league and will be again. I’d never wanna trade him (unless we’re talking about the theoritical situation, such as a Roy for CP3 deal— it won’t happen, its moot).

Some might be forgetting how good Roy is, but they’ll remember again soon.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 26, 2010 11:56 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Watch Roy "Drew Brees" us

Like Drew did to San Diego.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wish I followed football now

So I know what that means!

Is it a good thing?

—M

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Its a bad thing.

Brees blew out his shoulder, last game of the season. His throwing shoulder. New Orleans signed him, a few years later = Super Bowl.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thats my point on trading Roy

Don’t wanna get Brees’d. Lets build around Roy.

Solid Screens.

Great Defense surrounding him.

Great Shooters to open driving lanes.

Great inside scoring to open up outside shooters.

I solved it :D

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

we seem to have

players that could do that, they just haven’t done it yet. Hopefully they will soon, if not we need to make some moves!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wes Matthews

Was a great addition as a backup wing & it shows me PA is willing to be defense first, even if he has to pay.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

not sure

he’s too small to play sf and too big to play point, we want roy out there and don’t want to run a small unit, I predict either him or bayless and rudy will be gone by the beginning of the season, maybe all 3?

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rudy will be gone for sure

Possibly Bayless depending on who we get back. I think Wes can play defense on 3’s with quality weakside help which we can provide with Greg, Joel & Marcus.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

joel will too

be gone I bet, if we make a move, he’s most likely involved with the exp contract

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt

Hope we get good value

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Drew Brees us?

that makes no sense, the chargers got rid of him, he didn’t leave and then tear it up on another team, I’m pretty sure that the blazers are not getting rid of roy, and if they do it would be for a similar reason like the chargers, they had a great player to replace him and brees had what some called a career ending injury and the chargers didn’t think he would recover.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Derp?
. I’d never wanna trade him (unless we’re talking about the theoritical situation, such as a Roy for CP3 deal

Don’t have to tell me I am a Chargers fan. I love Philip Rivers & expect him to get his ring soon for the city of SD.

NO took a chance it payed off. Good thing Drew had the greatest surgeon ever on his staff to recover.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

they'll get one if

they can get some quality supporting cast. They need some receivers.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Their offense is fine

Malcom Floyd, VJack will be back before seasons end due to him wanting a contract pre-CBA renegotiation. Not that you care but there has been some great work by the WR’s in camp.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

we'll see...

I don’t mind the team that much, but some of the players just bug me, the attitudes just bother me for some reason

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

If.

Your counting Rivers as an attitude you need to research the man. He is humble, family & god loving man.

I hated Cromartie. Worst attitude, soft as tissue. Thats why he was traded.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

not a big fan of

merriman, and I don’t know much about rivers, but the way he was talking trash to jay cutler I think it was just bothered me for some reason. not sure why it just did.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hah.

Yeah Merriman is a loud mouth & his production is down so he is not backing it up. I say come back season or out. As for Rivers, if you lip read him you see him say “Your a Big _______ Baby”. I love the passion out of my QB. He reminds me of a new age Favre.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I saw it...

Like I said I don’t know why, it just bugged me.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you know what the guy is about

It shouldn’t bother you. God > Family > Football> Passion. Gotta love it.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

ya

I don’t know anything about him

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think its correct to say he’s an easy top 10 player in the league. In ‘08-’09 he was a top 5 player on offense, but you gotta consider defense also. Then, last year, he wasn’t a top 10 player on offense, and he was well below average on defense.

He can be a top 10 player again, but its going to take some recommitted on his part. I’m fairly optimistic, but not 100% convinced he has it in him.

by jksnake99 on Jul 27, 2010 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

ok so i wouldnt trade him for alot of guys, very few guys infact - i think we need a list

who would i trade broy for? lj, kobe, wade, carmelo, pgashole, cpaul, durant, mabey garnett but prob not

by Captain fruit on Jul 26, 2010 11:56 PM PDT reply actions  

are you crazy?

absolutely no garnett, he is done, durant yes (but okc would never) gasol? no way, he’s not a superstar he’s the robin to a batman, I wouldn’t want carmelo, he’s an ass, wade yes, cp3 yes,

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 26, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm

My list is smaller.

First off, no trades for perimeter players who don’t pass. So no Durant, no Melo. No “non-passing perimeter player” ever won nuthin’ except scorin’ titles. The guy who has the ball in his hands the most HAS to be able to pass.

Nobody who is on their last legs. No KG.

Kobe’s production has been the same as Roy, if not worse, when Roy is healthy. We just play slower. Kobe is a better defender though— still, not Kobe.

Wade, Lebron, and CP3 are all obviously better and more dominant players. Removing how unrealistic it is that any of them would be traded, or for Roy (even though CP3 might be traded it makes no sense for them to trade him for Roy when money is such a problem for them right now), we can say that they are better players than Roy. You put one of them in his place, we are likely a better team.

But that’s not a fun way to follow a team, of course.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

sorry, but you lose a LOT of credibility

if you honestly wouldn’t trade Roy for Durant. That’s just insane.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Jul 27, 2010 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously?

That’s silly.

So the guy who plays in a much faster pace who scores 7 points more, has more turnovers than assists, and has an abysmal assist percentage to go with a huge usage rate, is that much better?

I think Roy’s style is a much better offensive style for winning. Melo and Durant need great PGs to handle the ball for them because they don’t know how to pass. It’s a similar play style that can score but is awful for running an offense through (and part of the reason, aside from Brooks schemes, why the Thunder have such a prodigious scorer but a bad team offense).

I guess my credibility is shot, it ruins my whole midnight.

Over the years, I’ve researched the numbers of the guys who win. No one who gets more turnovers than assists, plus is the dominant ballhandler, wins. Passing goes along with rebounding as something so few ever improve on after getting into the NBA, it’s near pointless to expect it to change. There are many different opinions as to why this is so, and what makes for successful basketball, but my POV is simple.

Strong interior defense, ability to score easy buckets, and playmaking from your primary offensive weapon to go along with efficient scoring is the way to win. Durant is as efficient as all git-out, gets to the line 80 times a night, but he doesn’t kill the other team with passing like the best players do… the Wade, Lebron, Kobe, and right below them the Roy.

And perimeter players who have the ball every possession and don’t know how to pass do not historically win. Now, by “win”, I mean win big.

Please note I am not ripping on KD’s defense; I never have, because defense is something any player can improve on if they wanna. It’s why Roy’s defense is annoying, because he CAN do it. Passing and rebounding though, those don’t change. Ya is what ya is.

And KD is an amazing scorer, who is a bad passer. And turns it over more than he gets assists. That’s not a good combo in a perimeter ballhandler.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

To me

There’s a reason why no one (like, literally, no one) with that playing style has won a title.

I think OKC should eventually move KD to PF and remove him from handling the ball so much. He can be similar to Dirk, but with less-good passing. Don’t iso him so much; have playmakers handle the ball more.

He’ll lose the height/length advantage, but he’s still plenty tall and lengthy, and he’d still be quicker than most PFs.

Just because he can score from the perimeter so easily doesn’t mean it’s the best thing for his team.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Your being a bit bleak about KD's situation in OKC

For my tastes. Particularly your not mentioning the fact that he is only 21 still. He has plenty of room to grow. Not only that but as his team grows around him they will only get more efficient, as will KD.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Players generally

Don’t get more efficient after 3 years in the league. Now matter their age. I think what Mortimer is saying is. If Durant has the ball in his hands a lot and turns the ball over at a greater rate than he assists he hurts his team in possessions lost.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Jul 27, 2010 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's also hurting his team as he's not a threat to make a play

He’s going to score, and a guy can only score so much no matter who he is— he’s also gotta be a threat to make a play so the defense stays honest, and it creates other opportunities for your teammates.

It’s not that KD’s not a great scorer, or that he can’t improve, it’s just a playing style that doesn’t help the teammates much on the offensive end. So, I say, have him still score lots but don’t handle the ball so much so ya have someone who actually passes to his teammates, makes plays for them that spreads the offense around.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

But his rebounding

and scoring makes up for his passing, especially with guys like Harden & Westbrook around

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think it works that way.

The dude handling the ball, has to be able to pass. Being good in another skill (defensive rebounding) doesn’t cancel out the weakness in another.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Meh.

30PPG, 7+RPG… You can’t really argue with it :\

Come on now ! Dude is ridiculous.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Those two numbers

Are two things I am not arguing with. He did indeed score 30ppg and get 7 boards a game, and did it efficiently. I, for one, can’t see how someone would say he didn’t get those numbers, and didn’t do it well.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just saying

If he was any better(and he is only 21) he will have no problem supplanting Kobe as the face of the NBA. Certainly passed up LeBron imo despite his lack of passing. Anyways I am losing logic, getting tired. Had a fun back in forth with you Mort. Enjoy your night everyone !

Here is to the Blazers pulling off that deal/non deal that will get us a gosh dern championship here soon ! RIP CITY !

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

If we're going to discuss rebounding, let's be aware that Kevin Durant is ...

putrid on the offensive glass. Regardless of that, though, it doesn’t have any affect on Durant having poor handles and being a bad passer. Unlike players such as LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Kobe Bryant, and even Brandon Roy, Durant doesn’t make his teammates better due to his inability to facilitate for others.

by AK1984 on Jul 27, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

He will get better at what he is good at

But he won’t get better at passing, if we use NBA history as a guide.

It just… don’t happen. He’s going to be a bad passer for his career, just like any other bad passer, or how any good passer remains a good passer. He can cut down on his turnovers through experience, but he’s still not gonna be a good passer.

One guy who did take a team to the title and was a more-or-same-amount-of-turnovers as assists guy was Ricky Barry. Back in the 70s. 70s ball is super weird and flukey when ya watch it, and he’s the only guy (and it was something like 4 and 4— lotsa turnovers).

It’s the same reason I don’t expect LMA to magically become a better rebounder. Guys don’t do that, no matter their age.

Kevin Durant will continue to improve as a defender, and a scorer, but to expect him to be a good passer isn’t realistic.

Mortimer

PS: But enough about KD, in the Roy thread.

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

His turnovers will get lower imo

As his team mates rely on him less.

Him as a passer, probably not much improvement.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

We gotta make a power move

Thunder outta be a powerful team.

Westbrook
Harden
Durant
Ibaka
???(Perkins?Dalembert?)

Green/Sefolosha backing them up? In a few years, I don’t know if the current roster has what it takes unless Batum turns into Reggie Miller & Oden stays healthy n dominant.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not as optimistic about them

I like Westbrook, and KD is a great scorer.

They were a great defensive team.

Batum into Reggie Miller? Huh?

Anywho, back to Roy Boy!

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

heck yes.

I’m of the opinion Batum is closer to a Reggie Miller then a Pippen, maybe a hybrid(praying;) )

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think of Durant as being more Gervinesque than Rick Barry

Rick Barry was one of only a handful of players to average over 23 points, 5 assists and 6 rebounds per gave over his entire career. He had a lot of tools.

The Dude abides.

by BrewDude on Jul 27, 2010 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

To many people get caught up in the scoring average. Lots of great scorers have played this game and not won titles.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Jul 27, 2010 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

All of 'em just got unlucky then

And for some reason, all of those great playmaking perimeter scorers kept getting lucky with the good teammates and won titles.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt.

Or conspire with team mates to join up in free agency. Oh wait thats the twatter era.
 :\

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Haha

Yeah, it’s kinda cheating, but should the Heat win titles, Lebron and Wade will also end up in the “playmaking scorers” category.

It kinda ain’t fair though, they stacked the deck!

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

What I'm thinking is.

Batum starts conspiring with Parker.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

oui

oui

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Miami winning championships

Is not a done deal. Three big stars on the same team could get a little crowded with the ego’s.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Jul 27, 2010 1:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure, lots could go wrong

They’re weak at the PG and C position especially.

All I knows is, Lebron and Wade are amazing players, who are both amazing scorers AND great playmakers. I think Wade may be marginalized a lil’ bit since Lebron will likely handle the ball the most (he’s a better passer), but they’ll both be amazing.

I wouldn’t pick up Bosh in any fantasy leagues because I think his raw stats will take a hit, but his life will be easier with Lebron and Wade garnering so much defensive attention.

A lot can go wrong, but ya can’t argue against that being an awesome base to start from.

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

The simple answer is to somehow trade Miller for Chalmers.

Then they won’t ever get out of the first round. The entrails of an oxen told me so.

by zaruga on Jul 27, 2010 1:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Andre is the health-sucking vampire

send him to south beach as an agent provocateur

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not a done deal, at all...

When Stern came out and blessed the Big 3’s collusion, I wondered why… Then it hit me… He still has the refs in his pocket…

Three whistles > Three Superstars…

I see Miami making the finals just about every year, maybe winning the 3rd year… Too many people want them to lose, Stern now has another “hated” team (in the mode of Boston and LA) to play the role of villian…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Rick Barry is the only guy to play that way stylistically and win a title in the process.

Barry did it with the 1974-1975 Golden State Warriors, although that occurred during an era diluted by the ABA. Heck, I bet the ABA Champions that season (i.e., the Kentucky Colones) would’ve triumphed over the Warriors in a seven-game series.

by AK1984 on Jul 27, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought those Pacer teams would've been NBA top 5, back in the early '70s

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 28, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1. Durant is younger, better on offense, and makes an effort on defense. Its not even close.

by jksnake99 on Jul 27, 2010 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's a better defender now

I think saying he’s better on offense is incredibly simplistic.

Thanks bye bye I say that and leave!
Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not going to trade Roy for anybody. But if I made the decision based on only basketball considerations I would only take LeBron, Wade, CP3, Durant, or Howard for Roy.

Kobe’s too old (and quite overrated), Gasol is good but not good enough, I wouldn’t take Melo and definitely would not take Garnett who isn’t even worth Aldridge at this point. I might consider Deron Williams.

"Talk's cheap, we all know that. It's like I've always said - 'don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby."

-Buddy Nix

by billsfan4life on Jul 27, 2010 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Gasol is the best PF in the game

when he plays aggressive. He can do everything. I don’t want to trade Roy for him, but don’t discount his talents

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

BRoy is ranked #19 on the 2010 projections... CP #2... KD #1

Not that Fantasy Production= NBA production, and there are many guys above Roy on this list I wouldn’t trade him for…

http://games.espn.go.com/fba/tools/projections?display=alt

Still, taking into account skill, age and contract, I think you’d have to at least consider an offer for Broy that got you:
KD, LeBron, DHow, Pau, DWill, Melo, DWade, Curry or Tyreke Evans…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Curry and Evans?

That’s a stretch at this point.

"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave

by DC Blazer on Jul 28, 2010 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Brandon Roy is the definition of untouchable, in my book

He needs to retire as a Blazer. He’s the perfect personality, northwest grown, and an amazing player. I would rather go deep into the playoffs every year with Broy and company than win titles with Lebron. But for me it’s more about the journey and the experience than about winning at all costs.

by ostateblazer on Jul 27, 2010 12:00 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

As a player, Brandon’s game vexes me. His game has several gears and all of them aren’t always functioning. When the top gear kicks in, nobody in the league can stop him, he’s the quickest player on the court and a dynamic offensive force. But other times you see him on the court with someone like Deron Williams and he’s blown away.

Brandon has this exceptional ability to elevate his focus and effort to another level and when he peaks his game is beautiful to behold. He can maintain this elite level of play for weeks at a time, but there are other stretches of play where he seems ordinary and slow. I wonder how often we will see the transcendent Brandon versus the solid/borderline all-star Brandon.

Undoubtedly there are flaws in Brandon’s game. He doesn’t have the speed to run the court, he is best suited playing with the ball in his hands so finding a PG to pair with him will always be difficult, and he is an average defender (except for those rare end of the game occasions when he really does play defense and plays really well). I can live with these imperfections, because I know Brandon is always playing hard and wants to win.

I do think Brandon can lead the team to a title, but in the same vein as when Chauncey Billups led the Pistons to a championship. To win we ultimately need Oden to stay healthy and Batum to develop into the player for which we all have hoped.

"Talk's cheap, we all know that. It's like I've always said - 'don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby."

-Buddy Nix

by billsfan4life on Jul 27, 2010 12:04 AM PDT reply actions  

we had the pg

we had one of the best pg’s for Roy, Blake. He’s a threat from three keeping teams honest. Andre and Roy are so similar that teams could just double team them back and forth with no consequence cause andre can’t hit past 15 feet. Ridnour would have been a good fit, and hinrich would have been a good fit. Too bad we keep trading Blake…

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bunch of garbage.

Blake was posted up by each and every PG, dominated defensively & all around provided nothing but an extra pass and the ability to hit the open 3(not when it mattered of course).

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

well, thats the pg that works best with roy

are you kidding me? we haven’t had any pg work with roy as well as blake did. I’m pretty sure that means his style meshed with roy’s.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blake = No Defense

With all the great guard play in the league, you won’t win a championship with Blake as a starter.

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wasn't saying

blake would win a championship for us, I’m just saying what type of pg mesh’s with roy’s style and thats what it is, hinrich would be better cause he plays d and can hit the 3, but there isn’t a whole lot like them out there.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Again, do you want a title, or a few thrilling last second victories?

The problem I have with the raionale that says “BRoy needs a PG that can shoot a 3”… Yes, that helps if we continue to play this iso offense. How about thinking out of the box, and figure out not what we need to play with Roy, but rather how Roy can learn to play in a team concept…

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol

like Kobe and Derek Fisher…or Jordan and all his elite PGs…

BRoy is an elite wing, meaning you want the ball in his hands, not the PGs. What you do need, is a PG who can shoot 3’s and play defense. Roy is known as a willing passer so I’m not sure where you get the idea that hes not a team player

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess you don't want a title, then...

Billy,
1) The BRoy iso offense has been shut down, easily, in the playoffs.
2) BRoy making statements like
a) “I’d rather play with Blake”, and
b) “the team needs me to get my touches”, and
c) focusing on O, and resting on D

tell me that BRoy is not the kind of team leader you find on championship teams.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

1) like when he dropped 42 on Artest and Battier…or are you referring to the Phx series??? I sure hope not

2) a) So would I, if I were BRoy. Miller is a better PG than Blake, but not necessarily a better compliment to BRoy. Miller can’t shoot, and Brandon is better at drive and kick as far as his passing game. Either way that is pretty old news and adjusting to new teammates takes time for anyone.

b) what exactly do you find wrong with this statement? BRoy is the best player, particularly on offense, so yes, the team needs him to get his touches

c) last season, while hurt. Matthews/Batum will help tremendously this year

As far as a title, I say it has exponentially more to do with the players being healthy and talented than it does the coach or the system or any other such thing. Greg being healthy is as equally important as Roy being healthy. Will we win a title this year? Probably not. Do I blame BRoy because he is our leader? Heck no.

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

What do I find wrong with "the team needs ME to get MY touches??"

Where do I begin… (First, I agree with your last paragraph – the health of the players trump all. The coach and system are very important, given health, and I don’t think we have a winning system.)

Brandon made that “touches” statement in the middle of the “do we start Dre” brouhaha, and when we were trying to integrate Oden into the offense. I believe that statement was confirmed by Nate a day or so later, saying “yes, we need to get Brandon the ball”… Now, I understand some may think that is a good strategy and fine statements.

But if you’re looking to win a championship, here are some reasons why that may not be what you want your star to say, or believe.

1) To assume that the team NEEDS Brandon to get his touches is NOT a team oriented statement, and shows his ego, and his priority as “me first, team second”. (I realize that most do not believe Brandon has a me first attitude, and that he does want team success, but a statement like this does not show those traits. It sounds, dare I say it, selfish.)

2) Developing a low post offensive threat (Greg) will greatly
improve our ability to space the court and create open 3’s. If the D is sagging, and once a double or triple comes, it becomes simple for Greg to hit the open man for a 3. I would argue that Roy might get better looks if he gave the ball to Greg, and waited for the pass out. His statement in no uncertain terms told the big guy to back of on developing his low post game.

3) Sure, when the game is on the line, and we have one possession, absolutely, give BRoy the ball. But unless you think he can score 100 a game, other people have to get involved. And I know a team is better off when 2 or 3 guys think they can take and make the last shot than the team thinking, “hey, either Brandon makes it, or we lose”. It’s a TEAM game.

Bottom line: it shows a selfish, me-first, ego-driven attitude that is NOT something you’ll find in a championship locker room..

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like what you're saying as a general concept...

…but here are the holes I see in your logic.

1) While that statement may sound selfish, and it does, the reality at the time it was said is that he’s right. Without Roy getting touches on offense the Blazers weren’t going to beat anyone. In order to judge a person’s personality you can’t look at just one or two comments. Consider the way he has acted on and off the court throughout his career at the UW and in Portland- He has always been known as an unselfish person who cares about his team and its goals.

2) That is just not what he is saying. Every basketball player except perhaps Artest and Starbury understands the value of the low post offense. Roy said he needed his touches, not everyone’s. He was not saying he didn’t want Greg or the other players to be involved in the offense.

3) Of course no one expects him to score all the points. Thats why we want to bring him the supporting cast he needs. He is the man to take the last shot on this team, but that doesn’t mean other people shouldn’t score.

I haven’t been in the blazers’ locker room (that would be awesome though), but I doubt that I would find a me-first, ego-driven attitude coming from Roy if I got to. Thats not who he is, even if one quote may sound like that. Plus, he’s young still. He’ll mature still. Get off his back.

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, I'm rooting for him to mature!

I know he’s been a good kid, and you’re right about the dangers of extrapolating from one remark. (But there’s been more than one, there’s a trend there.)

I’d like nothing else than to see Brandon come out this fall and say something like:

“our goal is to make it to the NBA Finals. Everything else is ssecondary. I don’t want anybody on this team talking about making the All-Star team. We need to work as a team, focus on defense, run when we can, and play hard as a team… "

“I plan to let Dre run the offense and really move well without the ball, around screens, playing well without the ball. I can still get my shots in, and I’ll still rise to the challenge when the game is on the line, but we need to get everybody involved in the offense. I want to work on the pick and roll with Greg, and my entry passes to the post, because if we can really work well together, we’ll be that much tougher to beat”

If I heard those kind of words, and saw him backing them up, I’d be one of Brandon’s biggest fans.

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Glad we're on the same page

Although I don’t care what he says about the details. I just want to see it all happen

by Ezrap97 on Jul 27, 2010 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bad logic

“we haven’t had any pg work with roy as well as blake did” =! “blake is the pg that works best with roy”

Blake was a negative on D and got abused by every screen ever set for him. Good guy, solid shooter, tough attitude & great determination. An inspiration for scrawny white guys everywhere. Will be a stud in the triangle. But not a champion PG on a Roy/McMillan team. No way no how.

by Marvin100 on Jul 27, 2010 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Roy's defenitely our man

as for the problems with his game, he is even more aware of them than we are. I remember reading at the end of the first round that he was going to take things easy this summer, but then he gave that interview at SL and he looked and sounded better than ever. Personal trainer that has given him a whole new approach to the gym, cutting weight without sacrificing strength and hopefully adding speed, better off the ball movement. Not to mention Bayless keeps looking better and better as the roy backcourt backup…

by Nael daFox on Jul 27, 2010 12:15 AM PDT reply actions  

The Once and Future King

I first really watched Brandon play in the 2006 Tournament. What caught me most was that he had a force of will that pushed him above his opponents. Before the draft that year, he topped my board. For me, he was the one player that we had to take. When we took Randy Foye, I felt so disappointed that I lost the chance to see BRoy don a Blazers uni. And, then, he was ours. KP will forever hold a dear spot in my heart for delivering us Brandon.

Over the last five years, I’ve come to rely on the joys that he brings me. For as many games as we get him each year, I can’t wait to see what he’s going to do. He has that “It” factor for me. When I look at Cleveland, to me their loss has as much to do with not getting to watch LBJ for 82 games and claim him as their own. Sure, he’ll never win them a championship, but it’s also about the loss of seeing that player develop with his team through out the year and career. I would feel a great disappointment if I had to watch Brandon in a different uniform. He’s so much fun to watch.

I can’t wait to see what Brandon brings to this season. With all of the internal strife in the Blazers management, with all of the big name free agent signings going to other teams, with the weight of power shifting in the league, and with a new “Super” team, I think a lot of anxiety has blossomed around the Blazers’ future and our hope to see some playoff domination. But, my counter to that was how much of an anomaly last year was. The Blazers’ health last year impacted a great deal of our perception around them and around our super star. At the start of last season, we couldn’t wait to see our star-studded team begin a season behind Brandon’s leadership and lead us deep into the playoffs.

When the product looks broken or unhealthy, we want to figure out what’s wrong with it. The reality is that the same team we were so excited about last year has gotten better. Brandon has worked a great deal to prepare himself for the upcoming season, and as he and LA start to enter their primes, I believe we will see the domination we’ve wanted to see. With GO, LA, Nicky Bats, Wes, Camby, we have one of the best defenses in the L. Brandon’s defense will improve with the strengths of his team. Will Brandon mess up on D sometimes? Yeah, but he’s going to be surrounded with some of the best help D. And, the intangibles he brings will always make his value so great. His force of will is stronger than it was in college, and he’s working hard to become an even better defender.

KP always saw Brandon as central to the team he was creating. I still trust that vision. He knew B’s weaknesses and strengths. Cho’s job is to get him one more star, and I think he’ll figure out a way to get it on the cheap, much like we got Camby. This team is going to be tough for any opponent and Brandon is an integral piece of that. Don’t ever give up on a winner, and that’s who we have in Brandon.

by Blazer7 on Jul 27, 2010 12:25 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

i would take a stab and guess

that mcmillan probably pushed for roy and saw what roy could do more so than KP or the scouts.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Jul 27, 2010 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well, if you believe Steve Patterson

KP and Paul wanted to draft the ’stache, in that ’06 draft

and Pritchard only negotiated the Sergio part of that draft, but not the Boston-Chicago trades

GMs are constantly delegating major draft decisions to their assistants and letting them take the credit for the picks. Happens every year, right?

FWIW, KP was hired to be Portland’s GM in ’07, not ’06

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

roy's career mirrors wade's quite a bit in terms of coming in and changing things around

roy started the new era out of darkness and wade won the ring
injuries injuries injuries! fans views of both players drop a bit.

hopefully there will be a new revival with a healthy roy and oden.

this also mirrors his college career where injuries set him back his junior year after being solid to start out…but came back his senior year and now his jersey is retired.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Jul 27, 2010 12:36 AM PDT reply actions  

lets hope

they drink a ton of milk to bulk up those glass bones!

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

G2 is all they need.

Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10

by Tofu Anonymous on Jul 27, 2010 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

More like the whole G-Series

Prime , perform, recover – Lol

Silent Swagger.

by 420Phenom on Jul 27, 2010 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

um exactly who has changed their perception?

     A lot of people have been lead down the path… by the local media. The whole cp3 thing got way out of control. Kenny Vance stated today he would take CP3 over Roy. Multiple local writers/hosts have pushed the we have to get CP3 if we want to win a title.
      Well lets look at what Roy has done and what CP3 has done. Titles? Neither WC champs? neither Best record for their conference? nope. CP3 has proven He IS a whiner now. Roy has shown he is mature beyond his years. He is the only Blazer to win ROY and go to the Allstar game in each successive season. He is a stone cold killer with the game on the line. Defense? well when you are carry a teams offense on your back your are pretty much going to have to save alot of your juice for the offense and let the defense slide a bit.
      A lot of criticism towards Roy starts with his pace and needing the ball. A lot of said criticism is misplaced. His usage while high is not off the charts. What is quite good is his efficiency. His assist rate, Assist to turnover ratio, rebounding, and shooting percentages are also excellent for a 2 guard. Lets hope calmer heads prevail and SOME of our home town media get back ON the PTB band wagon just a little bit. This team is going to the WCF this year as constructed….Maybe even the finals. A lot of other STARS in this league will have to sit back and watch the supposed inferior players such as Brandon Roy, Lamarcus Aldridge, and Greg Oden Blow by them this year.
O.R.

by Odenrising on Jul 27, 2010 12:45 AM PDT reply actions  

everyone

people just feel differently you can tell from the way they talk. People aren’t going out and saying that he sucks, but they just talk about him differently, more criticism and disappointment as opposed to giddy people drooling all over themselves.

by Green Eggs and Cunningham on Jul 27, 2010 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Which is a healthy thing, IMO..

and necessary if this team is ever going to grow beyond “Brandon’s team” to “Portland’s defending NBA champions…”

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I talk to a lot of Blazer fans

I haven’t had one say they think Roy isn’t doing his part in any way. On the contrary most say he is untouchable. Roy is the second best 2 in the game. He has shown it already and will prove it again this year!
O.R.

by Odenrising on Jul 27, 2010 12:51 AM PDT reply actions  

I've heard time and time again that Roy is the problem, or that he's selfish.

Which is ironic given that the “Roy is selfish” meme was meant to be an ironic joke. Just proves if you repeat something enough there will be people who turn it into truth.

by zaruga on Jul 27, 2010 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ugh you are just putting unfounded doubt in people's ears..

We all love Roy still and understand he struggled with injuries this past season. From what I hear, he’s been working hard and is in great shape this offseason. I predict him to have a great year and we will finally pass the first round of the playoffs. I know it’s a business, but there’s so much criticism on here. C’mon guys, we’re Blazer fans, let’s act like it. Portland all the way in ’10!!!!!

by Justjoshin on Jul 27, 2010 1:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Absolutely love him!

I’ve been a fan since his Washington days and was thrilled when he was picked up by the Trailblazers. My only remaining concern is that I’m not convinced that Roy is the guy who is capable of bringing a championship to Portland. I don’t know that he can be the elite talent able to do that.

Regardless, I hope that he’s around when it does finally happen for Portland, but at this point he’s going to need his surrounding cast to pick it up for that to happen.

by mwalter on Jul 27, 2010 1:41 AM PDT reply actions  

first post EVER

so first off I have been following blazersedge for a while I have just never felt inclined to chime in until now. Guys… I really need to get this off my chest, and at the same time realize I will probably ruffle a few feathers in the process but I have to say this. First a short story. So I currently reside in tualatin, and last week I went to my local bank to make a deposit and when I pull up low and behold some jackass in a brand new white chrystler 300 with dealer plates and brand spankin new white rims (which didn’t go that well with the ride I might add) was parked running directly next to a no parking sign. I thought gee what a jackass I wonder who in the bank is pulling this… and I walk in the entrance and low and behold B-roy is at the first tellers spot doing some business. Nice to see stardome hasn’t affected brandon yet. Anyways onto my comments on roy, he is so far the most talented blazer we have at the moment, BUT brandon is NOT a superstar, he is going to be nothing more than a perennial all-star team bench player. He isn’t a kobe, isn’t a lebron, and isn’t a dewayne wade. I honestly think brandon’s inability to create off the ball is his single biggest downfall. I personally lost alot of respect for brandon when all the drama with dre coming to portland went down, it seemed like brandon wasn’t willing to put his friendship with blake aside and make an honest effort to play ball with the better point guard and I think he also used his influence with mcmillan to influence this situation. So that being said, I would not mind seeing brandon go in a trade for CP3, I think people forget how bad the blazers chemistry was last season before oden went down, and with roy, oden and aldridge healthy nate is going to go back to having problems getting his team to work. (And I base this on many years of couch coaching and have developed my own thesis on mcmillan not knowning how to coach a big man oriented offense rather than a guard oriented offense but won’t get into that) flame on boys

by Russell B on Jul 27, 2010 2:04 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Good post Russell...

Just keep saying what you think, maybe mix in a paragraph break or two for readability, and enjoy the site!

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

welcome Russell

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Jul 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

welcome,

worthwhile post. :-)

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jul 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why have I seen this so many times on BE
he is going to be nothing more than a perennial all-star team bench player

I don’t understand this at all. McGrady and Allen Iverson were starters, technically, for the all-star team. It’s just popularity. There are only 24 all-stars in the league. Being any of them actually repected enough by the coaches isn’t an insult.
Yeah…let’s trade him.

If what I just commented turns out to be wrong, please delete from all memory.

by NBAstard on Jul 27, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Much of the criticism on Roy has been about two things

(and it’s been muted criticism. With qualifiers. More like: is he great? Or just awesome, and running into some barriers…)

But one of those things, at least in one theory, may have less to do with Roy himself, and more to do with how opposing defenses have keyed in on his game. When he first came on to the scene, I think he took people by surprise. That includes opposing defenses, who became stymied by this multi-prong, swiss army knife of a player. He had every trick in the book at a young age, and played at his own pace. Defenders were left scrambling, and because he was such a special, unique player, it took more than the normal amount of time to try and adapt.

We pretty much loved him for that: he also took fans by surprise, and we Blazer fans bonded with him big-time. As well we should. But flushed by success, and the league accolades he was snatching up, I imagine some of us thought he was on a direct flight to invincible. This season, and maybe even starting a little bit near the end of the previous season, I feel like we saw what happens on several occasions what happens when a good team commits to shutting down Roy. Early double teams, modified zones, whatever it takes … the offensive strategy of “give it to Brandon and watch” became a little bit exposed. Certainly the injuries ought to be taken into account. But it would also foolish not to give any credit to how other teams have started to make Roy’s job a little harder. Those famous drives into the lane, the loud yelps not withstanding, seemed just a little less productive this year.

Of course it’s not just a one man team. Is it all on him, or on the guys spacing the floor and missing the jump shots? This leads to the second thing: people starting to become unsatisfied with the overall Blazer offense. That may be a totally separate topic for an article and discussion. This isn’t necessarily about people disliking Roy. Nate’s always has his critics— at least when there’s a loss— and there’s always been a few fans on the sidelines that just don’t enjoy the current Blazer system, in terms of pace, ball movement, coaching philosophy, or what have you. But because Roy is the central player— and to be fair, much of the offensive style is based around his strengths and weaknesses— it’s hard to separate the player from the offense. Also, because this last season had so many injuries— Roy included— and changes, it seemed like everything was changing on an almost month-to-month basis. Various players stepped up, but little wonder that it would seem like a tougher, down season for one Brandon Roy. Even though his overall numbers still were very respectable. The fan perception Dave alludes to may have a lot to do with that.

To be fair, it’s not like the Blazers, and Roy, didn’t accomplish a lot last year. And no matter what, you totally have to love the guy. I think the sneaking suspicions and doubts may have as much to do with fears of what happens against future playoff opponents when they clamp down on Brandon Roy, as much as anything else. As great as our boy is, that’s still a worry.

Are there only a handful of players that most most of us would even consider trading him for? Sure. Some of us would say no players, for both practical and sentimental reasons, and it’s hard to argue with that, too. But all of this is worth a conversation about where it goes from here. His limits, his teammates, and what will happen against elite level playoff competition, where teams make adjustments, and an offense based on riding one player only can go so far.

Lastly, the guy is great. He’s done nothing but surprise us, and he may not be done evolving. Will it be enough, and can the Blazers go all he way with the current, very Roy-centric team? I guess it’s hard to say, but that may be what eyes start closely watching.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Jul 27, 2010 3:06 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

The best answer I could give is a Stones line:

“You can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometimes you may get what you need”

by buky on Jul 27, 2010 3:16 AM PDT reply actions  

I still like Roy more than ever, but I went from thinking he could be a Wade/Kobe type player, to thinking his max potential is

Paul Pierce. Which isn’t bad, but I don’t think he’ll ever reach that Wade/Kobe level.

Still Brandon Roy is a rare player. He has real NBA skill. Not athletic dominance, but I wonder where his talent can get us.

by BRoyInThe4th on Jul 27, 2010 3:31 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

agreed

and let me just say that I’ll take me some PP any day. You guys remember his days back with Antoine Walker? PP was SIIIIIICCCCKKKK…check it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ64tfHcIek

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

just watched it again in fact

still gives me goosebumps. Like the BRoy turnaround against Houston…you just can’t replace those moments

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure if anyone has reference this link yet...

http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=7063

These stats have B-Roy as one of the leagues most efficient scorers against above-average defenses (h/t True Hoop). Defenders may recognize his tricks more readily now, but they’re obviously not much better at stopping him.

by iCollective on Jul 27, 2010 4:29 AM PDT reply actions  

oops

I posted below…before I read through this thread :)

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

The many faces of BRoy

I think BRoy thinks too much.
I remember he was thinking that he should dedicate himself more on D and went out and played great D for a couple of games, but found out it took away from his offensive game so he slacked off.

He got to tired in the first play-offs so he decided to take the summer off from BB, put on a little wt to help his offensive game. That made him sluggish, his shot was off and he wasn’t as effective.

He got hurt, but decided that he could give the team more support if he went out with one leg and played.

Now, he woke up and realizes he needs to be in better shape when the season starts so he is going all out.

That is why some fan’s are saying what’s next.

To me BRoy can be what ever he wants to be, but not all at the same time. He shut down Wade and Carmelo in games last year, he out shot Wade and Kobe, so he can do it all.

I still think the fan’s are to quick to judge. He was injured and trying to coast doing regular season to give himself more energy doing the play-offs and of course with his injury that didn’t happen. I also think that not going full out and just pushing it to the limits occasionally causes injuries.

Therefore, I believe He is great, guilty of mistakes like all humans, but is always thinking of ways to make himself better and that may be where his problems Begin’s and we see so many faces.

hg

by BBK on Jul 27, 2010 4:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Can't be happy with Roy

I won’t be happy with Roy until he leads the Blazers to 98-0.

by LaughingJon on Jul 27, 2010 5:03 AM PDT reply actions  

healthy Walton>BRoy>Drexler

Translation – he can lead us to a ring, but he needs as good or better of a supporting cast as Kobe has right now (or the TP/Kersey/Buck/Duck/Ainge/Cliffy supporting cast that Clyde had).

"Parting ways is not the end of the world. Ultimately, it may not be a bad thing at all, but right now I know the emotions are pretty raw. But it doesn't serve anyone to bash the Trail Blazers or Paul. It is after all a business of tough decisions. So, for the sake of the players, coaches and everyone who believes in Trail Blazers basketball, let's turn the page, move on and keep our eye on the prize." -KP

by The Cactus Leaguer on Jul 27, 2010 6:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Roy’s a terrific player. ‘08-’09 Roy was something to behold. Need to see that guy again, along with some better effort on defense.

by jksnake99 on Jul 27, 2010 6:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Andre Miller's play and leadership last year made Roy expendable to me

I want a championship now, I don’t want to wait for Roy to develop. The ’Zer’s need to starch while the iron is hot and build around Miller to WIN NOW. Cash in the chips Cho!

by tominhawaii on Jul 27, 2010 7:34 AM PDT reply actions  

A level-headed approach to how we feel about Roy

Nice job putting into words the feelings about Roy that has been in the back of many blazer fans’ mind for a while now. I think if we take a serious level-headed evaluation of Roy there is no way you can not like the guy. He definitely has improved his game every year. He’s worked very hard to overcome injury obstacles, and he’s done the absolute best he can to be the leader of a young team at a young age. If Brandon can make even a small incremental improvement in some areas of his game, as well as in his leadership qualities that bodes well for the Blazers this year and in the future. Like it or not, the blazers as a franchise are as much tied to Brandon as G.O. We might as well get behind him.

by jtkerr79 on Jul 27, 2010 7:37 AM PDT reply actions  

I have a hunch that Kobe Bryant would beg to differ...
For better or worse, when salary goes up unbridled devotion goes down.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 27, 2010 7:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Kobe is brilliant

he realized he could still be loved no matter what he accused of doing or was paid if he just wins championships. Dudes a thinker!

Oden >>> Batum

by Junk Drawer Bandit on Jul 27, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

wait..

who outside of L*kers fandom loves Kobe?

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

So you're a fan of USC football, too, huh?
It’s easier to empathize with the underpaid sophomore than the fat-cat senior.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 27, 2010 7:41 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I'm not sure I would have went with the "dead weight" metaphor...
Greg Oden may be the weight behind the train but Brandon Roy is the engine.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 27, 2010 7:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Roy is good, but I don't see him leading us to a championship. He's a 2nd tier all-star.

The truth is Oden is still the key to winning a ring and Roy will have to learn to not be as much of the focal point.

by Coastie07 on Jul 27, 2010 7:44 AM PDT reply actions  

2nd tier?

I’m not sure what that means. Second tier to Kobe in the west? How aweful…to be second best SG in the west. Or even 3rd.

If what I just commented turns out to be wrong, please delete from all memory.

by NBAstard on Jul 27, 2010 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

2nd tier all-star means exactly what it says. No one said it was awful.

It’s not going to lead you to a championship either though. Look at the list of past champions and most of them had 1st tier all-stars. Kobe, Jordan, Shaq, Wade, Hakeem, Duncan, etc. Either you need a star on that level or you better have at least a couple on Roys level. We don’t, unless Oden becomes his potential. That’s my point.

by Coastie07 on Jul 27, 2010 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

My concerns about Brandon Roy

Brandon Roy is a great player.
Not only do I enjoy watching Brandon Roy as a player but I’ve always thought his game was a bit of throw back.
Believe it or not, agree of disagree, the player Roy reminds me of, is Larry Bird. At any given moment on the court, it’s unlikely Brandon is the most athletic player on the court. But Roy controls the tempo, and makes things happen for himself and his teammates much in the style of a Larry Bird. I often get the same feedback I remember way back when I watched Bird. Not the fastest, not the most athletic, but at the end of the game? Often the best.

My concerns about Brandon Roy haven’t changed and they are simple.

#1. Given his admitted lack of knee cartliledge, and multiple surgeries/procedures it’s hard for me to believe he won’t have a shortened career. Can he play a full season/post season? How long before will and determination and all around skill start to lose ground to the reality of knees without cartiledge? Unfortunately, I can’t predict Brandon Roy having a long career at the highest level.

#2. Can a team built around Brandon Roy be a running team? This might sound like a contradiction given my earlier statements, and while I think Roys style of play leads people to think he’s not the most athletic player on the court, I conversely think that Brandon Roy is deceptively athletic. Watch Brandon break down his opponent, and get to the hoop, or make room to get a shot off and you realize the guy is a lot stronger than you think. However, he does seem to blossom is a controled pace. You don’t see Brandon leading a lot of fast breaks, or ending plays with thunderous dunks.

I suspect this concern the lesser of the two. I think Brandon can adapt, to the point where he knows how to be on the court and help facilitiate a line-up that wants to run when the opportunity arises. Will I ever squint and mistake Brandon Roy for the ghost of a Tom-a-hawk jamming Clyde Drexler or Jerome Kersey? No. While Brandon himself flourishes best in a slower paced game, a game itself is a big enough canvass that I think Brandon and a team that occasionally runs can co-exist with success.

So that’s it in a nutshell. What I like about Brandon Roy and what concerns me about his reality.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 27, 2010 7:45 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Interesting piece, Dave, and yeah, you're right, Brandon's "new car smell" is gone...

It’s sort of like Clyde Drexler, who went from being a worshipped icon to being “yep, it was about time they made that guy go away” man… Then he won a world championship and continued to perform at superstar level and it became clear that maybe that wasn’t the brightest decision ever made…

I worry about that happening to Brandon a little bit.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 27, 2010 7:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Hmm...

Well I guess I can only speak for myself, but while I loved Drexler and he remains the most talented Blazer that I got to watch from Rookie to Retirement in the N.B.A., I wouldn’t say I ever “worshipped him”.

I also think I take some exception with your contention that there was a strong groundswell from fans at the time thinking “it was about time they made that guy go away”.

Again, not from me, and even though you can always find the extreme malcontents, this was not a feeling I think the majority reflected.

I felt that Drexler and The Blazers had just reached an inevitable point. Drexler was an aging superstar and past his prime. The Blazers were in a rebuilding cycle. I’ve never held it against Drexler that he wanted to leave, and that he used what was left in his tank, with the help of Hakeem and an excellent Houston Team, to parlay his twilight into championship rings.

I think almost everyone knew that Drexler could still play at a high level when we traded him. But I think we all looked at what was left of his window and also realized that if you are rebuilding he simply could be nothing but a few seasons of quality play. The chance to go to Houston and play with his friend Hakeem and win a championship? Which way would you rather spend your sunset in the N.B.A.?

To me trading Drexler when we did had nothing to do with being a “bright decision”, it was the Right Decision. It was right for Drexler and IMO right in retrospect for the Blazer franchise. Drexler had given all he could give to The Blazers and the franchise was now in a different place. He could of stayed and we could of watched his role diminish slowly from leader and superstar to extremely talented role player, but I for one actually think it was nicer to be able to watch Drexler play his last few years on a stage inwhich his actions had impact. It’s too bad we never could quite reach that same plateaue with him as a Blazer, but I’ve never held his trade to Houston against him. And I never said to myself “It was about time we made that guy go away”.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 27, 2010 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

I stopped watching basketball entirely after Clyde was traded.

I was very young and the Blazers were everything to me. The last game I watched was Clyde winning the ring with Houston. I couldn’t understand why he could do that with them and not us. I also couldn’t see how the team could trade away their best player and my hero. None of it made sense.

To then hear about the Jail Blazer era that followed seemed fitting: one terrible decision often leads to another, I figured. The Blazers are getting what’s coming to them. I felt justified in turning my back on the franchise. It wasn’t until I moved to Portland from Corvallis in 2005 that I started paying attention again. Living in this city it’s really impossible to ignore the team if you have any love for the sport. All the same, it wasn’t until the summer of 2008 that I allowed myself to truly care again and follow the team.

So maybe the older generation was ready to see Clyde go, but to the kids it was devastating.

Stealth > Wealth

by 500dogs on Jul 27, 2010 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've noticed this too.

I think the only real reason is frustration. The injuries were tough to swallow, and the year wasn’t what it could have been. People understand intellectually that there wasn’t much that could have been done to avoid them, but human nature requires a culprit, so people are looking for that culprit, be it Roy, Nate, Rudy, or anyone else.

Overall, I’m glad we have Roy. I do wish he’d take the initiative and lead the way more often. He is perfectly capable of being a more aggressive team leader, and I’d like to see that. We need more games like Christmas Day vs. Denver. He settles for too many 20-25-point games, and I’d like to see him scoring more, if for nothing else than to make teams have to spend more time on him.

But I’m just not going to draw any conclusions about anyone after last year. The whole season was a state of “making do.”

by stavrogin on Jul 27, 2010 7:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Before I read the rest of the comments

I was just thinking this myself the other day. Roy is still “the man” but I feel like rising expectations and short-term memory (hello injuries) have led to some “fans” discrediting his ability and overall effect on our team.

I know it’s just one mans statistical formula, but Neil Paine is a freaking smart guy with no agenda other than to look at data, and BRoy’s name popped up in the top 5 of various statistical attempts he made looking for players who perform better against better D versus those who play better only against weak D. The article was actually comparing Lebron/Kobe/Wade but I was a bit surprised to see how high BRoy showed up. Check it out:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=7063

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 8:44 AM PDT reply actions  

interestingly

While it shows that Brandon shines against the best D’s (the point of the article), it also shows that he wasn’t even in the top 20 against the bad D’s. That shocked me.

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

but Batum

was amazing against the bad D…so it offsets :)

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Roy or Nate

The question to me is, who is calling the plays that puts the ball in Roy’s hands so much. That is what has to change. If Roy gets upset if he doesn’t get the ball enough then he is not sacrificing enough for the team. He wants to do it all and the development of the rest of the players go stagnate. On the other hand if Nate is calling these plays he seems to think this system is working. Now days the star players are made by how much the team exposes him to the offense. Roy is perceived as a star partly because of the way he is played. But it is not a way of winning basketball.

by fanfare on Jul 27, 2010 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

I would say that's exactly how they have won.

Almost every team has the star with the ball in his hands.
Look at the champions.
Portland will never get LeDouche, Wade, or Kobe. CP3 isn’t going to win you more games…unless Roy is still on the team. We will not get a better SG in Portland.

If what I just commented turns out to be wrong, please delete from all memory.

by NBAstard on Jul 27, 2010 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

wait

so $124/6 to Joe Johnson wasn’t a smart deal??? (tongue-in-cheek)

by Billy Hoyle on Jul 27, 2010 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

I still love B-Roy's game still, but the injuries have me worried.

Seems like he’s getting worn down, probably from playing so many minutes. I’m really hoping that Wesley will be able to fill more mid-game minutes at SG. I think that my be the plan and the reason the Blazers feel he is worth so much. At this point, it’s worth WMJ’s salary just to have a healthy Roy going into the playoffs.

"I just played my game. I didn't do anything special. Just take the open shot, make cuts to basket, get rebounds. That's it." ~Nic Batum

by vanceanthony on Jul 27, 2010 9:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Roy's still really amazing

But his injury-prone nature is one reason he’s lost some luster in the eyes of many fans, including me. That’s not his fault, it just is.

And frankly I just think we all overrated him at the beginning because we were so starved for a star on this team we could be proud of. He’s a great player, but he’s not one of those tier 1 superstars like Kobe, Wade or Lebron.

I give him a pass for a lot of the off the court stuff because he’s young and still learning. And I blame Nate more for the dull plodding jump-shot-oriented offense than I do Roy.

The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct

by leeroyjenkins on Jul 27, 2010 9:23 AM PDT reply actions  

I've watched Brandon play since High School, and my opinion of him has changed

Nobody…nobody was happier than I was when the Blazers traded for Brandon in the draft. I went from the depths of despair that we missed him (I wanted them to draft him at #2), to almost driving my car off the road when the announcement of the trade came through the radio. He was everything we needed in a player at that moment: solid citizen, great teammate, good leader, multi-dimensional talent who could pass, shoot, and get to the line. He surpassed even my most optimistic expectations.

However, there was one part of his game in college that has suffered in his transformation to NBA stardom. He used to be the consummate “glue” guy. A player that could go long stretches without scoring or having the ball, but still making significant contributions. I always saw him as the guy who would compliment the superstar in a championship team, not the superstar himself. I still believe that is the case, but Brandon’s aspirations appear to be interfering with that. He wants to be more, but for us to win it all, he needs to be a piece of the puzzle. I did not like the way he responded to Greg’s emergence early last year, complaining about not “getting” the offense and saying the team was better off when he had the ball more.

I can respect that this phase of the team’s transformation will be a challenge to Brandon, but I will lose respect for him if he doesn’t handle it with grace and integrity.

As it stands right now, I would trade Brandon for Chris Paul without hesitation if I knew Paul could have his contract extended. Chris Paul makes everybody better all the time. Brandon does that, but to a much lesser extent. That doesn’t mean I dislike Brandon or don’t appreciate his role in the team’s growth. It just means I can tell when one talent eclipses another.

Bring back the Uncle Cliffy!

by hawkblogger on Jul 27, 2010 9:31 AM PDT reply actions  

I did not like the way he responded to Greg’s emergence early last year, complaining about not "getting" the offense and saying the team was better off when he had the ball more.

I agree, but I think we heard Roy’s attitude change as the season went along, and now he realizes that “less is more” and that he needs to be more of that “glue guy” again

That’s what I’m hearing from him now, anyway. We won’t know for sure until fall camp and preseason starts how RAMBO will play out on the court

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 27, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I still prefer him to any player in the league

that’s right! i would not trade him for any player in the league. i’m not saying he’s the best basketball player, i’m saying he’s the best package (basketball + personality + fit)

by BarelyLegal on Jul 27, 2010 9:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Top 10 player in the league when healthy. But not MVP caliber.

He can be a focal point of a title team but he needs a really good team around him for that to happen. Bit more of a scorer and less of a playmaker than I expected him to be two years ago- the scoring part I think is just fine, but the lack of playmaking is surprising.

I’d still like him to work on developing a post game, a la Jordan during the second threepeat. I think he could move up a notch into the top 5/MVP caliber if he added that to his already deadly crossover, and I think he has the tools for it.

Pretty close to untouchable. I can imagine trading him for one of the top 5 like CP3, but why would CP3 want to come to Portland without Roy?

by howlingfantods on Jul 27, 2010 9:41 AM PDT reply actions  

Really?
Brandon Roy is the only superstar-quality player the Blazers have or are likely to get in this generation.

Roy’s game is not perfect but it’s both good enough and the best the Blazers are going to get.

How do you know this?

by Natsthecat on Jul 27, 2010 10:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Oh, Natsthecat, natsthecat ...

Haven’t you learned anything about Dave? Doubt not our resident savant and soothsayer for he speaks sooth. Savantly.

#52

by CatMan2 on Jul 27, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fans are so fickle.

Broy for life! Dave’s right on the money, we need to appreciate. Human nature is such that we are never satisfied. Broy came back 8 days after surgery for this team and for this city. He is one of the most efficient players in the league. There was a post on BDL yesterday about top players vs. good defenses and Broy was up there ahead of kobe, wade, lebron. I’ve noticed the hate lately too, get a grip people. . He is a top notch player on and off the court and Portland is lucky to have him.

Basket's that way, Chief!

by OneTrickPony on Jul 27, 2010 10:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Brandon is my homeboy

Greg Oden ate my baby. Need money for body-building training so that I may take my revenge.

by JJWeatherman on Jul 27, 2010 11:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Are you just as much in love as you were in 2007?

More than I was. I wanted the Stache. I worked nights at the time and slept through the first round so I had to look it up online, found out we drafted some guy named Roy, I was disappointed, I had never heard of him. A few years later, I wouldn’t want him traded, even for CP3.

Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. - 'The Sports Guy' Bill Simmons

by doublezeroduck on Jul 27, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

As you get older you'll realize that this kind of love is over-rated.

Nowadays when we see Brandon, we don’t necessarily want to jump his bones or even just get him in a lip lock. We’ve grown to appreciate that he’s always there for us, and he shows his commitment in a thousand little ways. By taking out the garbage without having us remind him. By putting his dirty clothes in the hamper instead of leaving them strewn across the floor. By surprising us with a nice home-cooked meal when we come home exhausted from Costco.

#52

by CatMan2 on Jul 27, 2010 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brandon Roy is selfish

He never passes to Batum (our best player) and he always waits until the very last second to win the game.

encrypted to prevent harvest by spam bots.

by JuwanMVPHoward on Jul 27, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't have a beef w/ Brandon. I have a beef w/ our offensive system or lack there of.

Brandon is a spectacular player, but we need to feature more offensive sets where its not him trying to drive past his defender(s) while the remaining 4 players stand around waiting for him to dish or make a bucket. Too many Iso’s are too predictable and will never be effective enough to get us far into the play-offs.

Whether Brandon has the ball or not, we need more off-the-ball movement on our offense to create more opportunities than just Brandon Roy’s playmaking via ISO’s.

I didn't mean to turn you on

by dukedee on Jul 27, 2010 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Crazy talk!

(jk, I 100% agree with you.. you must be nicer than me, cuz when I say those things, I get mauled. ;-)

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really don't see

how anyone can dig on Brandon.

He came back EIGHT days after surgery. He dropped 42 in the playoffs on Artest and Battier. He has been the complete package on and off the court. When he is on, he’s as good offensively as anyone in the league. I think he needs to at least play average defense and needs to get his assists back up to around 6 per game, but he is a true hero in the basketball sense.

Those wanting him gone need to re-examine their lives. Do they do their job as well as Brandon does his? Do they hold the fate of their employer’s vitality in their hands?

I think not. Brandon will raise the Larry O’Brien championship trophy for us someday and he will go down as the greatest Blazer ever.

by Shane Stafford on Jul 27, 2010 1:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Brandon Roy is my god

I would say that any “criticism” should merely be phrased as “ways Brandon can continue to grow his game,” which is something every great player does. Jordan couldn’t hit a jump shot or play shut down D early in his career. But every year, he seemed to add another dimension to his game. Brandon can and should do the same. That’s not knocking him. That’s just solid advice.

As a huge BRoy fan, I would be giddy to see him take defense so personally that he becomes a killer on that side of the floor as well. And I think he will. He has greatness in him.

The other knocks on Brandon should be directed at his Coach. Sarge scored 6 ppg in his mediocre career, and he sees himself as the perfect model for all his players to emulate. No one is allowed to be versatile. Brandon can only play offense and has to rest on defense (what would MJ say to THAT assertion!?). Rudy can only shoot threes and isn’t allowed to create or catch any more lob passes. And if he misses, he’s out. LA can only get plays run for him in the first quarter. Greg can only block shots and rebound. Don’t try to do anything else, Greg! No one is allowed to run the floor. Ever. (Nate won’t let anyone do anything he couldn’t do with his extremely limited game.)

People say Brandon can’t play without the ball. That’s because he’s never been in an offense that didn’t require him to have the ball! How could we know? How good would Phil Jackson make Brandon Roy? It’s scary. Brandon has the tools, the unselfishness, and the clutch heart to move from top 10 to top 5 player in the league.

All he needs is a coaching change.

by sagcat on Jul 27, 2010 2:56 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Strong rec for you sir...

I agree, Nate needs to change (or be changed/fired) more than Brandon. We’ve got to give BRoy a break! Get the ball out of his hands, and run a bit, so he can rest of OFFENSE, instead of D. Riding him hard for 82 games is just not adding to his longevity, or making him fresh for the playoffs.

And I do think he can still improve. I don’t want him gone I want him to be the leader of a great team, with a varied, potent offense and tough, stingy defense. If he wants to get to the next level, there are specific thinigs he needs to do to improve, and those kind of things are what I’ve been calling for.

But Sarge, man… Show a new offense this year, or be prepared to be shown the door… You’ve already hired an easy interim replacement. (Bernie)

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is Natural

Rookie with Potential = Loved

Rookie turns into Star = Loved even more

Star signs fat contract and doesn’t surpsise as much = loved less

Star fails to deliver title and fans fall in love with new “potential guys” and new “wiley veterans” = hating starts and perspective is lost.

I’ve seen it a million times.
I love B Roy, he aint perfect but he’s damn good. He is anything but selfish, and as clutch and cool as they come.
The fact he is a terrific man off the court just makes him all the better.
I would be devestated if he left.
Whenever there is a Superstar, there will be haters. Especially from that stars own city…. until he wins a title anyway.

Stars

This is Jack burton from the PorkChop Express and I'm talkin to whoever's out there.....

by Jack Burton on Jul 27, 2010 3:02 PM PDT reply actions  

great read!!

you’re right Dave. the Natural has spoiled us…..

kObe iS thE aNtiChRiSt

by Brendan Holladay on Jul 27, 2010 3:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Like, Don't Love

Have always had the same thougts on BRoy. Not as gaga as some Blazers fans over BRoy, but that might be because I am a Blazers fan that lives out of state.

Think he is a very good player, but not a superstar player (that word gets thrown around way too much, ala C.Bosh, Boozer, Johnson..).

While I like BRoy, here are some issues that keep him from going to superstar status IMO
1) Defense- below average. Defense is a lot about wanting to play it. I have always found LMA & BRoy soft on D and that is a problem when your top 2 players are probably your worst 2 defenders on the court. Hard to tell others to give it there all when the top 2 don’t.
2) Hustle- I don’t think he sells out in this area as much as he could. How often is BRoy flying up the wing, filling the lane on a fast break, hustling back on D rather than talking to ref. He looks in absolute slow motion, which is fine for his 1 on 1 game, but overall no so much
3) leadership- others have said how much of a leader he is. I actually don’t see anything that proves he is. Just because he is our top offensive player does not make him a leader. Is Batum a leader also since he is our best D player? BRoy is very quiet on the floor, unless talking to a ref. I don’t see him that oftern being vocal or encouraging other players. If someone is going to bring up the he played 8 days after surgery card, great, he was a negative on the court (minus the emotional lift from the 1st game, 2nd game back was terrible) and as a leader should have taken himself out. Outside of scoring and taking the last shot in games, I don’t see leadership qualities. He doesn’t have the Kobe/MJ “I am going to kill you” presence on the court and he doesn’t get after his teammates for lackluster effort.
4) Long-term- BRoy makes his $ on the offensive end in the ISO sets. People kill Nate for this, but this is what BRoy does best. BRoy is not overly atheltic vs the insanely athletic NBA players. If his knee/hammy continue to trouble him, I see the number of years of him having high offensive production being limited as right now, he was (I thought it tailed off last year) good at the hesitation dribble drive to the basket or pass out. This year, I thought he settled to much for long J. But, as he ages or injuries creep up, his lack of athleticism will be that much more apparent as if he loses a step or 2, then he is guardable.
5) What position is he? Chris Paul would not work with BRoy. BRoy is for all intensive purposes a SG that nees the ball in his hands for the ISO’s. He is not an off the ball player. Why bring in an all-star PG who has to have the ball in his hands to do what he does when BRoy needs the same. If he was not happy about A.Miller who is a good passing PG, then he is not going to be happy with a ball dominant PG.

BRoy is a very nice player. He came along in a Blazer down time and brought us back to a 2nd tier contender. But for some to say they wouldn’t trade him for anyone in the league or he is a Top 5 player, as much as I love the Blazers as well, that is just not realistic. Kobe, LeBron, Wade, Durant, D.Howard- really you would not trade BRoy straight up for any of these players?

I’m in the minority, still like him, just don’t think he is the all-everything that some make him out to be. Would like to see more hustle and a defensive effort. Let the BRoy is “all that” replies begin :-)

by keeweekid on Jul 27, 2010 4:00 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Well said

and without the blinded homerism..Good details about Roy and what you get from him.
   I can only add that this team has still plenty to prove…And it falls mostly into creating an atmosphere that not only wins games, but builds the teams character and adds some solid credentials to what their identity actually is…sitting on an identity that has plenty to prove will get you nowhere and leaves you stagnant…
  There is a lot of soul searching and “figuring it out” to do this year…I actually think the key people, in this regard, need to show that they are more than just fan favorites, offensive showmen, or offensive efficiency wizards…this team is far from complete and should never have chosen the path of satisfaction…it has been, and will be, their road block towards the new levels they need to attain…This breakup of confidence has been the best thing that has happened to this team..hopefully all (including Roy and Nate) can learn from past mistakes….we shall see if we have the “key” people necessary to carry this team past the immature state it is now in….
  I have always thought that Nate has never prepared his teams very well at the start of the season..they always seem to come out of the blocks with very little energy..Then they never grasp the reality of what energy can bring to the party…..puzzling to say the least,, but in reality a product of Nate’s system. Slow, mundane and methodical….true energy killers.

[Good defense "releases" your offense]

by WyEast on Jul 28, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

??? then

“slow, mundane, and methodical”
the question is, is that a problem with Nate and his system, or Nate creating this type of system as it maximizes how his best player likes to operate?
Guess kind of what came 1st- the chicken or the egg? If people don’t like the style of Blazers play, is it Nate’s system, or tailored to BRoy style of play?

by keeweekid on Jul 28, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Both

But it’s the lack of flexibility which underscores all of the issues coming out of a one man show…it tends to make spectators out of the rest of the team, and often fails to take advantage of game situations that can give you the easy hoops that all good teams need over the course of the season. You simply can’t deny opportunities for the team based on a chosen style of play….use the players skills, but also don’t get so delusional that you handicap your team over the long haul.
   That said, I actually believe that both Nate and Roy, now recognize this. So I might assume that maturity will start to develop and allow the team the room it needs to grow.
    It’s rather stupid to carry the weight of the teams success on one man’s shoulders. Then throw out a “geared” and deliberate system that can easily entrench the entire team in mediocrity. …just an opinion, but if you add about 10 #s of energy to this team, I could almost expect that to translate into more wins and further advancement into the playoffs. Energy is one subjective element that you simply can’t deny, and works best in an environment that doesn’t have to regenerate itself with every half court possession.

[Good defense "releases" your offense]

by WyEast on Jul 31, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

#7 FTW

I love B-Roy. He’s clutch, wants to win, and is entering his prime years. We are incredibly lucky to have such a great player—and great person—on our team.

Rich Rolled

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jul 27, 2010 4:10 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Absolutely!

Now if he’ll play D, and lead the rest of the team to do the same, and learn to play without the ball, then maybe he can hoist that trophy!

by Visionary2 on Jul 27, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Roy is one of my favorite opposing players

Roy and Dwyane Wade. Assasins. They just kill you every time out, slowly, repeatedly, methodically. With the number of Kings games that I watch (all of them – pity me), I don’t spend a lot of time watching non-KIngs games, but I always stop and tune in when the Blazers are nationally televised.

I don’t know as much about Roy as any of you, but sometimes distance provides greater clarity. Once Roy starts playing again at full health, I believe that he will erase any/all doubts about his game. But be advised, I can’t be completely objective here. I may be a Kings fan, but I loooooooooooove Brandon Roy.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jul 27, 2010 9:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Roy's great but ...

Of course you expect more from your best player. When he’s the spotlight of the team, that’s where you focus most.

I don’t think he entered last season in ‘basketball’ shape. His handles weren’t tight early in the season, which is a key factor in his very high efficiency offense, since he turns the ball over so rarely for a player of his usage. I’m happier to hear that he’s going to actually pick up a ball this summer.

I was disappointing in his defensive effort last year. I understand that even stars need to pace themselves, but I think he could try harder especially earlier in the game when the offense isn’t running through him, or late in games when time outs provide plenty of rest. I still clearly recall a possession where Joe Johnson tried to Iso Roy (I think it was 3 years ago during the 41-41 season) where he harassed JJ so much that JJ almost turned the ball over and got off a very poor shot. I believe he can be much better here, even if it isn’t every possession.

My other main on the court beef is his preference to start iso’s by bringing the ball up the court and starting so late in the shot clock to start his move. I think Portland would be much better served starting iso’s earlier in the shot clock (with either someone else bringing the ball up the court or Roy dribbling much harder) so that Roy has more options if/when a double team comes. When he slowly walks the ball up and iso’s he often is working very late into the shot clock with very little time left to make the 2 passes necessary to find an open shooter if he’s doubled.

Having said that I think he is an exceptional basketball player and my favorite Blazer since Clyde years ago. He has many, many positives, but the above explain at least for me, why I want more from him.

by aces_dad on Jul 27, 2010 9:36 PM PDT reply actions  

perception...

of him as a player hasn’t changed, but his role on the team has changed.
He isn’t the young promising star anymore. He’s now the established franchise player.
I think that the arrival of Oden clouded the fact that Roy is the true engine of this team to some. I’ve heard him referred to as selfish. I agree, but I don’t think that is a negative. The best player on an NBA team had better dang well be selfish. He has to be if the team is going to compete every night. The other knock on Brandon is that he can’t play a fast paced game, which is also not really true. He is a master at creating offense in the half court, but to say he can’t also run a full court set is like saying Iron Chef Morimoto can’t make cereal. Brandon is still the best player on this team, and one of the best in the league. He is also the most fun to watch and a great person. As a fan for over twenty years, I personally would not trade Brandon for anyone in the league.

"I been ridin' the midnight train, got ice water in my veins." -Bob Dylan
"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice

Darren Collison.

by koyote on Jul 28, 2010 1:46 PM PDT reply actions  

If the Blazers ever even thought about trading Brandon Roy for Chris Paul I might have to find a new team.

by Strike3lookin on Jul 28, 2010 2:47 PM PDT reply actions  

The Blazers just lost a couple embarrassing games...

after somehow pulling of the series opener. Their superstar was out, just 8 days removed from knee surgery. I was in my apartment at school, on the east coast where I was alone in my fanatical obsession with the Trail Blazers, anxiously awaiting game 4, reading blazer blogs and news sites. Rumors were circling that All-Star shooting guard Brandon Roy was recovering well from surgery. He might be able to play by game 7, if the series lasted that long. Then a hope, barely acknowledged, rose he might make it by game 5, he’s without pain. Rumors developed. He’d asked Coach Nate McMillan to play in game 4, assuring him that he was in no pain. I kept reminding myself that the chances of him playing that day were slim to none. Who had ever played in an NBA game a mere 8 days after knee surgery? Then rumors began to be substantiated, facebook statuses appeared rapidly, stating that Brandon Roy would play. I was excited. I could barely contain my enthusiasm in front of my roommates who cared nothing for the NBA, let alone the Portland Trail Blazers. I sat in front of the television; minutes could not pass fast enough. The game began. Brandon Roy wasn’t starting; my enthusiasm waned. We took an early deficit. It was beginning to look like game 3, like the Blazers were no match for the red hot Phoenix Suns. But not long into the game Bradon Roy stood up and removed his warmups. The crowd erupted, shivers ran down my spine, and the game turned around

His play was barely a shadow of his usual self, but I will remember that moment forever.

Brandon Roy is a warrior. He has heart unmatched by any other all-star. He cares for his team and his fans, and is willing to put it all on the line for them. He is the face, the engine, the heart of the organization, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

by tjv on Jul 28, 2010 6:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension
Cap004_small
A Running Team should Know How to Finish the Fast Break

Recent FanPosts

My-top-20-shaw-brothers-kung-fu-films_small
When Life Hands You Lemons... BLAME THE REFS
Dali_gala_lincoln_small
Don't blame the bad goaltending call
Small
I Want My Block!
Small
Should Goaltending be reviewable?
Small
Trade Drawer
Blazers_birdman_is_not_welcome_here_pic_small
Serious Injuries to Danilo Gallinari and Chauncey Billups
Suit_small
Woulda, shoulda, coulda
Small
Freeland agent's turn to play with Blazers's back office's nerves
Bns_small
The "Improve the team" Thread 2/5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...
Since everybody else was showing off their art I thought I'd join the crowd with my Felton picture.

Recent FanShots

Four Haikus About Bonzi Wells
ESPN Insider: Batum ranked number 21 out of 25 best players under age 25
Sick of seeing the Sonics fans.
New format for rookie/sophomore game
LaMarcus Aldridge vs. Kevin Love nba.com poll
L.A. Getting some love from Dirk
Earl Watson Underwent Laser Therapy On Sprained Ankle (ATTN: Ray Felton)
Chat with Michael Wilbon: I asked a question and got a decent answer.
Arenas holding open workout

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm