Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Transcript: Bill Simmons And Chad Ford Discuss Kevin Pritchard, Paul Allen & The Elliot Williams Controversy

During a two part draft podcast posted on June 25th, Bill Simmons and Chad Ford discuss all things Kevin Pritchard.

It's no secret that Ford has been a big time Pritchard fan for a number of years.  That history makes some of his comments here even more interesting.

In Part One, Ford and Simmons start with a discussion surrounding Ford's frustration over Elliot Williams, the guard from Memphis who Portland selected with the #22 pick in the first round.  Ford is peeved because he got smokescreened by Pritchard when he thought the two had an open and honest dialogue.  

It's natural to be upset as a reporter when someone lies to you.  In this case, that frustration is made more interesting because it involves questions about Williams's health.  Ford essentially asserts that Pritchard or his staff members misrepresented their knowledge of Williams's health and potentially overstated the seriousness of his knee injury.  You might be having flashbacks to the controversy over Darius Miles, when league executives anonymously accused Pritchard of bad-mouthing the damage done to Miles's surgically-repaired knee in an effort to keep his salary off of Portland's books.  Of course, Miles was an outgoing Blazer.  Williams is an incoming Blazer. Awkward stuff.

Then, in Part Two of the podcast, Ford and Simmons give their thoughts on Paul Allen, Kevin Pritchard's firing, the timing of the firing, how they would have reacted in Pritchard's situation, what Pritchard's legacy will be and how other executives around the league view the desirability of Portland's GM position. It's an extended discussion and it's always interesting to hear the national perspective on this big-time local issue.

Click through for a full transcript of both discussions.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Star-divide

Part One: Elliot Williams

Bill Simmons:

We have so many people now covering the NBA and tapped into different sources. We've got our ESPN guys, you've got the Yahoo! guys, you've got the newspaper guys, you've got Ken Berger at CBS. It seems like there's a lot of information out there and it's very easy [for NBA teams] to pick one writer and push some sort of agenda. You mentioned on twitter last night that you thought Portland did that with Elliot Williams from Memphis. Explain.

Chad Ford:

"There was a lot of whispering, hushed tones. "We hear this kid may be injured more than possible. We don't know. We don't have any information. What do you know? Oh my goodness, maybe it's a catastrophic injury." All of these different things. Then, once I collect enough... that spreads like wildfire throughout the league, right? People write about it. All the GMs are like, "what do you know? What have you heard? His agent won't return our calls. We don't know what is going on."

When I finally got a hold of the agent and he's explaining to me what's going on. Listen, I had to twist some arms to get the agent to talk, right? Sometimes as a journalist what you have to say is, "Look, I have enough people that are talking about this that I'm ready to write this. I'm giving you the opportunity to clear up the record if you want to. Finally, in this case, he was represented by Arn Tellem's agency -- Thad Foucette talked to me on the record about it. In the conversation, one of the things he said was, "He's worked out for Portland."

Alright. OK. Uh, so if you're hearing from a team, "We have no idea what's going on, we're completely lost, we can't get a hold of the agent." Then I find out the guy has actually worked out there.

Listen, there is a lot of lying. I think we know this. There is a lot of lying that goes on the week before the draft."

Bill Simmons:

"Shouldn't you do that, though? If I was a GM I would lie to everybody. Why wouldn't you put out as much false information as you could? Like you look at what New Jersey did at number three. They tried to make it seem like they were going to take Wes Johnson at number three for a couple of days, David Kahn had like a conniption, he was ready to have a heart attack over it. It's a competitive advantage to do that. I think that's actually smart."

Chad Ford:

"It is, except it's a fine line, right?  Because doing what I do, where I talk to a lot of guys in the league and a lot of it is off the record, that's how you get good information. There has to be a certain level of trust. For both of us, if they are going to lie, it's a problem, right?  Because I can't trust them. I had several individuals, I'm not going to name them on the podcast, who just flat out said, "You've got to trust me. I've never lied to you before. Chad, I'm not trying to steer you astray." And then flat out bald faced told me a lie.

"You know, frankly, when they call and they need something or how do you trust them any more. How do you know you're not going to be abused. So that's the other side of it. It's hard for me to say -- I understand because if I was in their shoes i might do it."

--------------------------------------

Part Two: Paul Allen / Kevin Pritchard

Bill Simmons:

"Say something to the fans of Portland that talks them off the ledge."

Chad Ford:

"Jump. My advice to you is jump. Because I think Paul Allen -- we talked a little bit about this in the debate -- has now entered the Donald Sterling zone."

Bill Simmons:

"He's Al Davis. He's crazy Al Davis. It's unbelievable."

Chad Ford:

"If you're an owner and you're thinking, "Who should I hire for my next GM?" take note of this. He was amazing as a General Manager. The team throws him under the bus for months. Leaves him dangling, leaks to the press all sorts of ridiculous and derogatory stuff about him. He keeps doing his job. Doesn't say anything. He now knows, he finally figures out that he has no chance keeping his job. He's working 20 hours a night still preparing for the draft, knowing they are going to fire him as soon as the draft is over. That's what is going to happen.

"It's an hour before the draft. As you're getting ready to walk in the war room, Paul Allen says, "Hey Kevin, can I talk to you for a second?" Fires him an hour before the draft but says, "Hey, we still want you to run the draft room tonight."

"Pritchard doesn't do what I would have done, which is when I got there, I would have picked up the phone and started calling around, "Listen, I'll give you Brandon Roy for your 56th pick in the draft. With the 22nd pick in the draft, we're going to take Omar Sanham. Which you would loved."

Bill Simmons:

"I would have enjoyed that.  Get the bleep button ready. I would have told Paul Allen, "Hey, Paul go [****} yourself. How about that? Go [****] yourself. And I would have walked out and that would have been the end of my GM reign. So I applaud Kevin Pritchard."

Chad Ford:

"Classy guy. There's no way that they are going to find a guy who is as innovative as creative as he is. RC Buford, Sam Presti, these guys are smart guys, they're not stupid. After they saw what happened to Kevin Pritchard, they're really going to give up the great gigs they have in San Antonio and Oklahoma City and go to that mess?"

Bill Simmons:

"I loved that rumor. Like Presti is going to go work for Paul Allen who hung Pritchard out to dry for four months. That sounds awesome."

Chad Ford:

"Whoever is going to take that job is taking that job because they don't have anything else better that I can do. Meanwhile, whether it's this summer -- and we know the Suns job is open, the Clippers job, the Warriors job and maybe a couple more when they find out that Kevin Pritchard is available -- if it's not this summer, it's next summer and he's the leading candidate, ahead of Danny Ferry, ahead of all of these guys. And he gets the job he wants. With Donnie Walsh's contract coming up in New York that could be the Knicks, it could be all sorts of different opportunities. He's going to come out fine. If I'm a Blazer fan, it's over."

Bill Simmons:

"Yeah, if I were Kevin Pritchard, I'd do TV for a year. Handsome guy, articulate, he'd be good, an asset to any  television show on whatever network. Bang it out for a year, get a paycheck and your price is going to be through the roof next year. I think people are going to realize that was really stupid, they just got rid of one of the top 7 GMs. And not to blow smoke up Pritchard's [****] for 10 minutes because he did, he whiffed on Oden/Durant. It has to be mentioned.

"I actually think if Paul Allen was going to legitimately fire this guy and come up with an excuse, where fans could be like, "Alright, I don't agree with him, but at least I get it," he should have played the Oden/Durant card. Like, "Look this guy messed up the biggest draft decision this franchise has had in 25 years." I don't think that would have been fair but at least that's a legitimate reason. I don't even know the reason."

Chad Ford:

"I don't think anybody does. I think we're all waiting for the other shoe to drop. The kind of shady revelation."

Bill Simmons:

"I think the info that's out is pretty accurate. I think they thought this guy was getting too much attention and publicity and I think it rubbed Allen and the people that run that Vulcan, whatever the [****], I think they were like, "Who's this guy? Why does everybody think he's a rockstar? This was a team effort. This guy takes too much credit." I actually don't think he was a take too much credit guy."

Chad Ford:

"It was our [the media] fault. It was our fault for that. He never came up with the term "Pritch-slap," that was a media thing. He didn't ask for... I was close to Kevin over the last few years. I never once heard him try to taunt his record, taunt another team. He never pushed that. He was always actually very complimentary. I knew who his scouts were. There are a lot of GMs who have never, ever mentioned to me a name of anybody else who works in their organization. He constantly mentioned these guys. Talked about them. Talked about Nate McMillan."

Bill Simmons:

"At the Sloan Conference he brought his entire staff with him. He was proudly ... I've only met Kevin twice, I thought he was a really nice guy, I wouldn't say I'm friends with him or even acquaintances with him, but I was impressed that he was so proud to introduce his staff to everybody. I just thought he seemed like a genuine dude."

Chad Ford:

"He's a genuine dude. I do think he does occasionally come across as arrogant. He's competitive."

Bill Simmons:

"He should be arrogant. He did a great job. I would be arrogant."

Chad Ford:

"This is the thing. If you're upset that he's getting undue attention that's one thing, but the reason the guy got so much attention was because he was doing a great job and I think this is the thing. You wrote one of my favorite columns, the one after there was no trades at the trade deadline, called the "No Balls Association." Kevin Pritchard had balls. He was not afraid and that's why fans, not only just Blazers fans, but NBA fans, appreciated him as a GM because he was not afraid, he didn't calculate at every step along the way, "What is the move that will keep my job for an extra six months?" It was always about doing what he thought was best and the most aggressive move. I wish there was more GMs in the league like him."

Bill Simmons:

"You have to give him credit to be the first guy out of all these guys to use cap space, not to just blow it on the free agent du jour, but as a strategy, as a long-term strategy of, "I'm going to take a bad contract, pick up a pick, I'm going to buy a pick here and put a guy in Europe who's not going to be ready for three years." I mean, maybe it was a group effort but that guy was in charge... I think Oden/Durant is really the only blemish on his resume. Even the Camby trade last year was a freaking heist."

--------------------------------------

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Comment 149 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting

2 years ago, there was the suggestion that San Antonio tried similar games with Nic Batum (but that Portland saw through the smoke traded ahead of the Spurs to nab him). And last year, nobody wanted to touch DeJuan Blair except—San Antonio.

Si equum mortuum flagellēs, non celerium currat.

by EngineerScotty on Jun 29, 2010 10:04 AM PDT reply actions  

last year, nobody wanted to touch DeJuan Blair except—San Antonio.

Exactly. It was bad enough when the Blazers passed on DB three times, but when the Spurs drafted him I smelled a rat. Propspects just don’t drop from the late lottery into the 2nd round that often, unless they have a legit injury. Someone was laying down some serious fertilizer re: Blair’s ACLs, and it cost the kid guaranteed money. If I was DeJuan and found out that the Spurs had done me like that, I wouldn’t resign with them. Just play out your contract and walk away, then beat their brains in every time you play them for the rest of your career

I wonder if Elliot Williams or his agent are having similar thoughts? But at least he’ll receive a 3 year guaranteed deal

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

hush money?

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 30, 2010 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, Blair got a 4 year deal, just like 1st round picks.

by ORDucktape on Jun 30, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chad Ford is an idiot, with this quote annoying the heck out of me.
“Pritchard doesn’t do what I would have done, which is when I got there, I would have picked up the phone and started calling around, “Listen, I’ll give you Brandon Roy for your 56th pick in the draft. With the 22nd pick in the draft, we’re going to take Omar Sanham. Which you would loved.”

Look, Ford, the Portland Trail Blazers top brass would’ve never signed off on such lunacy; thus, Kevin Pritchard couldn’t’ve done it. Pritchard, moreover, was there to do his job and act accordingly, so as to ensure himself of future employment in this league.

Ugh, without question, I abhor the idiocy of Ford and Bill Simmons, who are a couple of hacks. Also, I’d love to see some doltish owner hire Simmons in any front office capacity at some point. The epic failure that’d ensue would be pure hilarity.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 10:12 AM PDT reply actions  

i have to admit, when i heard kp was fired, i was holding out hope that they would pick me.

alas, my one chance for nba riches passed by with nary a ripple.
i am glad kp is more of a stand up guy than ford.

"I told somebody to stop crying," Pendergraph said after the game. "Actually, I told them all to stop crying."

by cornplant on Jun 29, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

i’m imagining them sitting around drinking Bud Light Lime while talking about this and their opinions become league wide facts

btw, bud light lime is not so bad…although it is for the weak minded

fiftytwo

by broyposse on Jun 29, 2010 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

you must admit that the lime does a decent job of masking the horrible

taste that is known as bud light.

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Jun 29, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

rec!!

My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.

by OCBlazerFan1 on Jun 29, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is a rhetorical flourish, not a serious comment

Ford is referring to the classy way KP left: working hard till the end, and not washing PA’s laundry in public.

by upper left corner on Jun 29, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

No, I think it’s totally appropriate to give KP credit for working hard when he didn’t have to. Are you just opposed to hyperbole categorically?

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think you’re being a little harsh, given the fact that this was a from-the-hip podcast interview and not an edited written piece. It seems like you have a problem with the guy that goes beyond this interview or this comment.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Everything’s a stylization, man, I’m with you. And when one rubs you the wrong way, far be it from me to try to argue against it.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Admittedly, I'm hard on everybody.

I’m just an hypercritical person, y’know.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

if this wasn’t the JD, i would have type a choice four letter acronym for you here

fiftytwo

by broyposse on Jun 29, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's better than being a blind optimist, though.

So yeah, I like who I am as a person and wouldn’t change a thing.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Over the top hyperbole is apparently just as difficult to read as sarcasm.

[insert witty nomenclature and/or out of context quote from someone that makes more money than I]

by HallelujahHoeDown on Jun 29, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Obviously you couldn't make trades like that

I think Ford was exaggerating, but KP could have just taken guys he thought would fail. Remember how everyone was shocked when he took Batum? If he had taken Darrel Arthur nobody would have been surprised, but he knew Batum would be better. If that situation happened this year he could have just taken the equivalent of Arthur knowing it was worse for the franchise, but everybody would have just said it was a good pick.

"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk

by terryisntbald on Jun 29, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure why Ford is upset about the Williams thing.

Every GM in the league blows smoke not just during the draft, but all year long. If he’s not expecting it, then he’s stupid.

Also, the biggest complaint I have of Pritchard is exactly what Ford exalts him for. He was great in the draft, but he has always valued his own players too high, and never pulled the trade to bring us a real player. It doesn’t take balls to buy draft picks and stash them in Europe. It takes balls to swing for the fences with a trade. Don’t think he ever did that, thus he has no balls. Hyperbole, but still.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jun 29, 2010 10:17 AM PDT reply actions  

I'd say the Camby trade was a pretty decent trade.

Not exactly swing for the fences trade, but to have one of those, you’ve got to either trade (a) big talent (Roy, Aldridge), or (b) big potential (Oden, Batum, maybe Rudy).

"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."

by Arby on Jun 29, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Based on Camby's expiring contract

AND the expiring deals of Blake and Outlaw, that was a no-risk trade. It was not a swing for the fences type of deal.

by Rodney Gustafson on Jun 29, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was building through the draft,

which is a smart move for a small market team. Now it’s a matter of which trade is the right one, because this team’s margin for error is pretty small. Swinging for the fence could be just the thing (CP3) or bring on an underachieving, overpriced player (Vince Carter).

I hope they can go out and get Tony Parker, but what would The Spurs need in return? Trades are very difficult to pull off.

I'm just not crazy about player nick names...

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jun 29, 2010 10:29 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Totally

I really wish we had Vince Carter or maybe Richard Jefferson. Those dudes would be sick on our team. Adding them in Orlando and San Antonio made all the difference in the world.

I get the logic here, but there was tons of pressure for him to make a trade at that deadline. From what I’ve heard, nothing was out there worth it. It takes courage to not do something many times, especially when everyone things you will/should.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 29, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

It also ain't like, in addition to the VC and Jefferson deals, other teams pulled off gangbuster crackerjack deals as well

Could we have gotten Conley for Outlaw? Maybe. Would that have been a good deal? I got no idea. Am I doing my KP impression by asking myself the question and answering it? You bet.

Who got held onto too long, really? If it is Outlaw, bringing in Camby as a BACKUP for a team that wants to contend for the title in the next two seasons is a lot better than most of the alternatives we had in front of us last year, or the year before. Camby for Outlaw and Blake is one of the better trades of the last few years and greatly strengthens our front line.

Is there another player whose value has plummeted? Aside from Rudy, I guess— but if you saw him being not-that-good in his sophomore campaign during last offseason, then one does get to win this battle of second guessing KP here.

I always hear “he didn’t make the big deal” and it’s almost always followed with no reasonable alternatives of what that deal should have been. It’s silly.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jun 29, 2010 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

The only thing I've heard that I kind of wish maybe we had done

Is Batum + RLEC for Gerald Wallace. Dude is hardcore. Other than that, I agree with you. And I don’t even know if that rumor was a viable option.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jun 29, 2010 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love Crash Wallace too

But I do understand not trading for him unless we’re at the very cusp of contending, since he does have the whole “one more concussion and he has to stop playing basketball forever” thing. It’s pretty risky, and I understand not feeling that he is perfect enough next to Roy and Oden, or good enough, to take that risk.

And with how many concussions he has and his playing style, and how he will only be as good as he is as long as he plays with that style, and how that style isn’t a good style for someone hitting his 30s… I get it.

I also would understand why someone would wanna take the risk, but it’s just one I can’t get hung up on.

Mortimer

#52

by Mortimer on Jun 29, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

From what I’ve heard, nothing was out there worth it.

I’ll always wonder what it would’ve taken to get Andre Miller from Philly 5 months early. There were discussions between the two teams at the deadline, and Miller might’ve been the difference between losing to the Rockets and beating Houston (or some other WC team) in the first round. If Portland had advanced in ‘09, the last 12 months could’ve played out a lot differently. We’ll never know now

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

It takes balls to swing for the fences with a trade. Don’t think he ever did that

A-Woj said that (according to his league sources) KP has been trying to knock another big trade out of the park since the ’06 draft

That’s not the story that we’ve heard when KP spoke to the local media, it was all about cake-baking and calm waters—especially after the ‘09 trade deadline when there was so much anticipation re: RLEC. But still, behind the scenes Kevin was always trying to “improve the team” and allegedly he’d make the same proposal over and over in hopes of the opposing GM giving in

I saw Toy Story 3 the other night and Lasto the Bear reminded me a little bit of KP. He can come off as all nice and friendly but once you get a peek behind the curtain, you’ll find that he can be competitive to a fault. Maybe that’s an extreme comparison, but that’s a recent movie character who helps to illustrate a point about how to not always judge a book by it’s cover

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

How much of journalism is actual journalism,

and how much is more an extension of team PR and agent, player jockying for leverage?

If Ford got ‘used’ in the Williams situation, perhaps he should go back to the roots of true journalism by utilizing credible, non-secretive sources while filtering the information with balanced critique. Live by the source die by the source—you can’t have it one way or the other, Ford. KP is a playa—Ford just a playa hater.

I'm just not crazy about player nick names...

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jun 29, 2010 10:22 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

You should listen to the whole podcast.

It’s pretty fascinating. The Eliiot Williams thing is just a small part of a much bigger conversation about how draft reporting works. Ford sheds a lot on exactly how the metagame stuff works.

by sammy on Jun 29, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Ford is complaining that he was mistreated by Pritchard, I think he is implying that it was unfair to attack Williams’ draft status, as the kid stood to lose a lot of money.

Also, for those who didn’t read through, Ford heaps praise on KP later on. I think he’s just concerned about organizational shenanigans harming the players financially.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:24 AM PDT reply actions  

This is what I was thinking, too.

"Nicolas! You're the strongest boy in the world!"

by ericking on Jun 29, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

just reading the transcripts i dont see how you read that.

it sounds like he is upset because the meatiest info reporters get come off the record from team sources and often not many of them at once. With the use of smokescreens, now each time he speaks to someone he has to really assess not only that person’s overall integrity but what they stand to gain from the info they are putting out with even greater scrutiny. And further if he puts out bad information, then it tarnishes HIS reputation.

It’d grind my gears but its part of reporting. I think its entirely possible that the Blazers said that (not even just KP in specific) but its also possible he worked out with us and we later could not get in touch with his agent. The best way is for him to get in touch with other sources like the players’ agent..but even then there’s an agenda. Sucks to be him :)

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jun 29, 2010 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ford seemed to have a "hate the player, not the game" attitude about it

I listened to the podcast when it came out so I can’t remember specifics, but it seemed more like he was using that as an example of something every GM does, not trying to pick on KP.

"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk

by terryisntbald on Jun 29, 2010 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

u mean DONT hate the player, hate the game:)

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jun 29, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

That would make a lot more sense

and it was also what I meant to type

"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk

by terryisntbald on Jun 29, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

You wrote one of my favorite columns, the one after there was no trades at the trade deadline, called the “No Balls Association.” Kevin Pritchard had balls. He was not afraid and that’s why fans, not only just Blazers fans, but NBA fans, appreciated him as a GM because he was not afraid, he didn’t calculate at every step along the way, “What is the move that will keep my job for an extra six months?”

I loved this – Elgin

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Jun 29, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

It helps to have PA's checkbook, no?

How many teams can throw around money to buy picks or move up ten spots every year?

I'm just not crazy about player nick names...

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jun 29, 2010 10:33 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

but like KP2 said

this is the smart and efficient way to use the money. You can either use cash to pay big-time free agents + luxury tax, or use it to buy picks and move into position to get riskier, but ultimately much more efficient, prospects who can produce.

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

dealing Webster when his WARP hit the ceiling was another example of this

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s little solace, but good to know we Blazer fans aren’t the only people who think firing KP was lunacy.

by Heizer on Jun 29, 2010 10:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, but those who don't agree are just idiots

I keed, I keed

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 29, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

the only way you can argue that the firing was not lunacy (basketball wise)

aside from his penchant for players with injury risks is by saying KP never made “the big acquisition”. Be that Crash, Hedo, Jefferson, David Lee-whatever. That could be a reason-sure-but before anybody gets to arguing that, tell me SenorMateo, how do you justify the timing?

Why not early in the offseason prior to our drafting times? Well KP is a draft wiz so lets wait.

Why not wait until we’re into lull of offseason after FA opens up?

Why string him on for months?

Why not give a simple reason for why he was fired?

I don’t buy the bald face truth’s explanation that they wanted to publicly humiliate him-PA doesn’t come across like that-but then the question begs to be asked, what was with the timing?

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jun 29, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd like to say one thing...

  Of course I’ve never been in a N.B.A. teams draft day war room. So this is all speculation. BUT…I think it’s stupid when people suggest that Kevin Pritchard could of poisoned the Blazers draft.

  I think it’s a simplisitc view if you think things are executed as simply as Kevin Pritchard picking up a phone or making instantly executable decisions. So when Chad Ford suggests that Kevin Pritchard should of, or that it was even possible? I think it makes him sound unrealistic or uninformed.

  When I heard Kevin Pritchard was fired, but was still in the war room? My assumption was it was more an exercise of The Blazers wanting to keep Pritchard away from the media during the draft. I’m sure they didn’t want him being interviewed nationwide as the draft was unfolding. Good idea to keep him in the secure war room.

   But if Kevin’s tenure as Blazer GM formally ended hours before the draft, or informally was over months ago, I’m sure his power was limited. The idea that Paul Allen or Larry Miller or (The Blazers Franchise) would let Kevin Pritchard trade Brandon Roy for a 56th pick and/or draft a totally unknown talent out of place with the pick? Seems like almost a childish uneducated understanding of the situation and how a draft actually is executed. Believe whatever you want to believe, but even if Kevin wanted to do something like that, it would of never happened.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jun 29, 2010 10:42 AM PDT reply actions  

He keeps doing his job. Doesn’t say anything. He now knows, he finally figures out that he has no chance keeping his job. He’s working 20 hours a night still preparing for the draft, knowing they are going to fire him as soon as the draft is over.

This is what Ford is referring to: KP deserves praise not because he didn’t poison the blazers, but because he actually worked his tail off to help them.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure that Kevin Pritchard is mostly focused on earning his last $800,000 and ensuring ...

himself of future employment in the NBA. I wouldn’t blame Pritchard for that, either, since one’s own self interests should always be of top priority. So yeah, Pritchard most likely worked diligently those last days in Portland with his future in mind more than anything.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

He would have gotten that 800,000 in any circumstance, and he would have gotten another job without giving it his all those last few weeks. His reputation is off the charts and he would never have been tarnished by taking it cool to massage the knife out of his spine. I think you’re being a little dogmatic with your reluctance to give the guy credit for doing the right thing when it wasn’t the obvious choice.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

The main reason Kevin Pritchard went through with the NBA Draft is due to the fact that he ...

most likely gets some kind of self-fulfillment out of it. Again, Pritchard is a human being with self interests — as we all are here — and isn’t some benevolent deity.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not saying he was “benevolent” to the Blazers, and I don’t think that Ford or Simmons are either (which could be a matter of interpretation). I think they’re saying this is a guy who takes his job very seriously and will go to bat with you until the very bitter end. I see no problem with giving KP credit for that. He deserves it. Anyone who argues taking it easy would have tarnished his image is completely oblivious to how overwhelmingly the discourse is dominated right now by anti-PA sentiment.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone who argues taking it easy would have tarnished his image is completely oblivious to how overwhelmingly the discourse is dominated right now by anti-PA sentiment.

We’re not talking about public reputation here though. Chad Ford has very little influence or probably even knowledge of the reputational factors that get GMs hired and fired.

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pritchard most likely worked diligently those last days in Portland with his future in mind more than anything.

This is what I’m disagreeing with.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why?

Quite frankly, I hope that Kevin Prtichard had the foresight to worry about his own future than that of even the franchise. Anything else would’ve been, well, foolhardy.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

His future would have been fine one way or the other. He didn’t put any money in his pocket by working hard for these last two weeks. He would have gotten his big pay day either way, which is why I say you’re being awfully dogmatic. Do you honestly believe that teams would have paid him less to be their GM had he come out and said, “I’ve been betrayed by my organization, and I refuse to go forward with people I know I can’t trust”?

If so, I regret to inform you that reality is not a meritocracy.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would say it's both

I have worked my tail off for several months in the past for an organization that I knew would go bust soon. Because the big boss had stopped funding it and we would soon run out of cash. I still did everything I could do in my power to help end it as smoothly as possible. There was no financial gain in it (as opposed to looking for a new job immediately) and it didn’t prevent the inevitable, only peace of mind being able to claim in the future that at least I and my team did everything possible.

I would assume KP acted out of similar motives to secure his future in the business, the future of his team, and do what he was hired to do because it was the right thing to do. Besides still doing the draft, notice that one of his last actions was securing the future for scouts Born and Buchanan with the Blazers, thereby giving them job security and assuring that at least a lot of what he had build up in scouting processes would survive.

by Norsktroll on Jun 29, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I truly believe

It is a combo of everything, from the benevolent (doing the “right thing”) and the self serving (making sure he looks good to future employers). I think he should get credit for still wanting to do the right thing, even if it ultimately could be self serving as well, and I believe it fits with his modus operandi for his entire reign as GM.

He took care of his Born and Buchanan, set us up with a seemingly good draft and some salary savings, and went out on top of the situation. Everyone wins.

Morty

#52

by Mortimer on Jun 29, 2010 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Psychological egoism is undeniable

but it’s the rationalization of those interests that make the difference here. If he simply followed through with the notion performing now would secure his next position, it’s something very difference than if he did so out of a perceived ethical obligation to his team.

AK, you’re skipping straight to the commonality in human nature and completely missing what provides contrast. The appeal of unbridled realism to explain is powerful, but any analyst worth a salt can tell you that the social nuances that create difference within humans holds far more explanatory power.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 29, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

yeah, you and night blue are both probably correct

in that, KP probably loved doing his job and completing the draft “project”, while at the same time well aware that he was auditioning for his next job. A reputation is an important thing.
It does KP no good to go out like a petulant, destructive looser, quite the contrary. He handled his final days quite well, to his credit. Trying to weigh these motivational factors is going to get pretty abstract, and irresolvable. It is smart to not be burning bridges, particularly when you are under a media microscope.
So, yeah, the “i woulda traded Brandon Roy for a low pick” comment was idiotic, and didn’t do a lot for the reporters credibility.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jun 29, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

that comment was a joke

anyone on here that REALLY thinks Chad Ford really meant the “Brandon Roy for the #50 whatever draft pick, or draft Omar Samhan” statement wasn’t listening, or never heard it at all and are working off assumptions

by rip_city_swagger on Jun 29, 2010 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chad Ford's comment was rhetoric and a joke, sure. It fell ...

flat, though, and made him come off looking petty and foolish.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

im with AK on this one

You can be sure KP was thinking of his future more than the Blazers. His hero act, perpatrated by his agent was the straw that broke the camels back but better believe Pritchard knew he was getting fired and was working to make sure he got a good draft in so that future employers would have something to remember when it came to hiring time.

Also and this is a tangent. Anyone who has ever dealt with HR knows full well the media prepared story of how it went down, is NOT how it went down. I feel remorse that KP is gone, but I am 100% positive there was a justification for his firing and we shouldnt deify him on the way out. That only serves as an injustice to the new GM.

OJ Mayo is the Blazers' PG of the Future

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 29, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sometimes I wonder if that's true

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 29, 2010 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

The main reason Kevin Pritchard went through with the NBA Draft is due to the fact that he most likely gets some kind of self-fulfillment out of it.

This is true. The scouts spoke of draft day as being like their Christmas morning. To deny KP the opportunity to contribute to the culmination of the process that he had worked so hard on would’ve been a cruelty. Paul Allen gave him a choice and KP wanted to finish the job, nobody twisted his arm and forced him into the war room. But maybe they should’ve restricted his outgoing calls to prevent leaks to the media?

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

true

the whole idea that he did this out of the goodness of his heart is kind of ridiculous. If he didn’t feel his heart was in the draft, he would’ve told PA that he didn’t feel he could do such a draining enterprise as a lame duck candidate, and that also would’ve been an acceptable outcome. I don’t think anyone but Ford and Simmons see half-assing it as a real option.

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

It’s not that he did his job, Ford is saying he went above and beyond. That’s the compliment. And that deserves recognition.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe he just loves running a draft?

by 50backflips on Jun 29, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes..

   ….but Chad Ford is suggesting (and I have heard other suggest as well) that KP “could of” or “should of” poisoned the blazers. Which Kevins personal ethics aside, I think is a ridiculous idea either way.

  If Paul Allen had decided Kevin was history…believe what you want to believe but I’m assuming his actions would be very carefully monitored and controlled. On draft night or weeks before, I’m pretty sure it would of been impossible for Kevin to suddenly fire sale The Blazers.

  So I’m not saying Kevin didn’t do what he could, or that he didn’t work hard…just saying that the idea that he could of even poisoned The Blazers operations seems to me to be a childish and revealingly limited view as to how actual concrete basketball operations are executed.

   Even during previous years, I always assumed a draft was a huge team effort, I also assumed that Paul Allen would have ultimate say…and nothing would happen unless he signed off on it. Thus the idea that Brandon Roy could be vindictively traded off for a worthless pick…stupid.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jun 29, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t agree with you at all. Ford is not insinuating that KP could have/should have poisoned the Blazers, he’s saying that KP acted with maturity when immaturity would have been forgiven. His comment about Roy for 56 and Omar Samhan etc. are exaggerations meant to demonstrate how petty someone might have been, i.e., it would have been very easy for KP to create a scene on draft night and come out as the sympathetic figure.

But he didn’t, and he deserves credit for it.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

OK...

  but here is exactly what Chad Ford says:

“Pritchard doesn’t do what I would have done, which is when I got there, I would have picked up the phone and started calling around, "Listen, I’ll give you Brandon Roy for your 56th pick in the draft. With the 22nd pick in the draft, we’re going to take Omar Sanham.

  He IS saying he would of done it, which is suggesting he thinks Kevin Pritchard should of….which I think is childish and shows a limited view of how a draft is actually executed.

  Yes, HE IS NOT saying Kevin Pritchard would of, or did…and I never said Kevin Pritchard would of, or did…that wasn’’t the point of my post.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jun 29, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

He IS saying he would of done it, which is suggesting he thinks Kevin Pritchard should of

Assuming that these two things are the same, as you assume they are, is a fallacy. Ford is suggesting that a lesser man (such as himself) would have done those things. In no way does he imply that KP should have done them.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

My point...

…has been all along that I think it’s stupid of Chad Ford or anyone to think KP could of poisioned the draft even if he wanted to. And Yes, I do think saying, “This is what I would of done” is implying pretty directly that Chad Ford thinks KP should of done it.

  You seem so wound up in defending KP, whom I’m not attacking, that you are missing the entire point of my post.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jun 29, 2010 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sure they didn’t want him being interviewed nationwide as the draft was unfolding.

I doubt ESPN had a camera truck in the parking lot at the PF. Looking back, perhaps they should have anticipated that photo op

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jun 29, 2010 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sad, but true, to see that this is the national story.

The Blazers appear to have been working like crazy to spin this locally and limit the damage to PA’s reputation. I take this interview as a sign that the national media is less susceptible to the manipulation emanating from the Vulcans, the team, and 95.5.

Last nights Courtside was almost nauseating. The attempt by Miller to “normalize” the firing of the team’s exceptionally successful GM was pathetic, IMO. Mike Rice, Mike Barrett, Antonio Harvey, not to mention Jaynes and Kenny Vance and Brian Berger, all have been trying to deflect blame from PA and insinuating that KP deserved what he got.

It looks to me like a clear case of history being rewritten by the victors in the power struggle lost by KP. None of us know what really happened, but I know I am highly skeptical of the spin coming from all these guys.

by upper left corner on Jun 29, 2010 10:44 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

When an invading army conquers a town

media stations are as valuable of targets as military installations. That says something.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 29, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Remember Baghdad Bob? It's easy to over spin into the ridiculous and blow credibility

Blazers broadcasters are sounding like they’ve gone to an all Baghdad Bob format. They sound ridiculous next to the Kevin Pritchard’s goodbye letter.

Canzano actually got one right when he said this is one of the darkest moments in Blazers history. Blazers broadcasters need to completely shut up on the whole episode. Talk about draft picks and Oden’s healing knee. Show nothing but x-rays of Pryzbilla leg on Courtside for the next 3 months. Anything BUT defend what Allen and Vulcan did to KP. They need to stop talking about the situation completely. Stop trying to pretend Pritchard firing wasn’t a monstrous self-inflicted wound.

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Jun 29, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Baghdad Kenny Vance will have to be replaced, by the way

Baghdad Kenny has completely lost freakin’ mind. He snapped under the pressure.

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Jun 29, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

sure

and KP’s camp hasn’t used a bit of spin at all.

Chad Ford’s own gripes about being lied to re: Elliot Williams immediately disprove that. It’s laughable that Ford can talk about KP and not put those two things together.

by abdelnaby on Jun 29, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is a self-inflicted wound

Sure KP is trying to make himself look good, and LeGarie is probably doing what he can to make PA look bad, but the bottom line is that anybody with a lick of sense would have known that PA was going to look bad coming out of this situation.

by upper left corner on Jun 29, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with that statement

I was mostly referring to where you said:

I take this interview as a sign that the national media is less susceptible to the manipulation emanating from the Vulcans, the team, and 95.5.

To me, I take that interview as a sign that Simmons and Ford are more susceptible to the manipulation emanating from KP, LeGarie, their inner circle, and Jason Quick.

by abdelnaby on Jun 29, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

An interesting take

but don’t you think it is the local media who have rather quickly changed their position in regards to Kevin Pritchard?

by simoninaustralia on Jun 29, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have zero respect for our broadcasters. A very short time ago, they were driving the KP is a deity bandwagon as much as anyone.

by jksnake99 on Jun 29, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

They also know

NONE of them can afford to have any other public opinion on this matter. It is totally not a valid source of real info about this whole ordeal.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jun 29, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

Blazer Broadcasting is Blazer broadcasting. E.g. The Mikes answer ultimately to PA. Someone like Quick or Ben have less to lose (other than possibly access).

"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave

by DonkeyShins on Jun 29, 2010 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sure

Making it both understandable (if not the most virtuous thing in the world to do) that the Blazers media types would side with the owner, and exactly why any info that comes from them during this time regarding this topic should just be ignored.

They will undoubtedly include true stuff with the spin, but it’s still a horrible source to learn about all of this from.

M—

#52

by Mortimer on Jun 29, 2010 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

We all know Mike Barrett and that whole lot are company shills.

Now, I can’t totally rag on them due to their motives being driven by adhering to their employer; however, that also means what they spout over the microphone is nothing more than useless fluff.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't understand this.
…a clear case of history being rewritten by the victors in the power struggle lost by KP.

How was there a power struggle? KP doesn’t own the team. He doesn’t have any power except what PA chooses to give him.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 29, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

and if it was a power struggle between Miller (the business side) and Pritchard (the basketball side) to win Allen’s affections, then the criticisms of LM as an empty suit are pretty far off base.

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly, Kevin Pritchard was beholden to Paul Allen as his boss.

Allen is an inept lunkhead when it comes to meddling with the basketball operations department, sure. Nonetheless, the Portland Trail Blazers are his business — or toy, if you want to get smart-alecky about it — and, as a result, Allen can run it in any fashion that suits him, even if it’s into the ground.

by AK1984 on Jun 29, 2010 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

It seems quite clear that a lot of folks were working overtime to influence PA's thinking

KP clearly had enemies. Other GMs, like Warkentein, were feeding info to A Woj who was doing everything he could to make KP look like a grandstanding idiot and stir up further resentment among other GMs. Kolde and others at Vulcan had their own agendas. Miller’s role in all this is pretty unknown. Was he just trying to duck for cover, or was he actually trying to get more credit? We don’t know. There have even been suggestions that Tom Penn had designs on the GM chair and went out of his way on certain occasions to make KP look bad.

The point is that there was clearly a power struggle for PA’s favor and KP lost. Now those who remain live in even greater fear of incurring PA’s disfavor, so everybody is praising the Emperor’s new clothes even though his bear bottom is clearly exposed.

by upper left corner on Jun 30, 2010 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed - I shouldn't be surprised that employees of PA would throw KP under the bus

with aplomb, but still, those guys all spent a lot of time together. I would think it would be difficult to publically back this, but to be fair to those at 95.5, it’s not my mortgage at the whim of Paul Allen.

Speaking of cruel, Portland fired GM Kevin Pritchard an hour before the draft. Hey, he's only a top-seven GM -- there are plenty of those. Does anyone else think Al Davis died a year ago and took over Paul Allen's body? - Bill Simmons

Can't get over the fact that Pritchard -- fired earlier in the day -- is still running Portland's draft. If I were him, I'd be in Portland's war room loudly calling other GMs and saying things like, "I have an offer for you: I'll trade you our No. 23 pick, and in return, YOU HELP ME PULL THE F****** KNIFE OUT OF MY BACK!!!!! Do we have a deal????" - Bill Simmons

by blazeraddict on Jun 29, 2010 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I find it interesting that Portland fans are not the only one's up in arms over the KP firing

Personally, I’m not going crazy over the whole thing, though I do worry a little that Allen is becoming a poor (or rich?) man’s Donald Sterling, but at least he’s not as big of a cheapskate.

Nevertheless, it’s just interesting that the national media is talking about this the same way we are.

by HailOden! on Jun 29, 2010 10:46 AM PDT reply actions  

I was thinking Daniel Snyder

Redskins meddling owner. Had been in the playoffs most years before Snyder. Now .500 is a good year .

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Jun 29, 2010 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Makes you wonder.

Is there some elaborate deception scheme going on here? This is pretty bizzarre. Who was behind the deception and why? Was there misinformation propogated or is this something else? Did KP orchestrate this knowing the shoe was dropping?

by doomsdaymachine on Jun 29, 2010 10:52 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

P. Allen IS the Al Davis of the NBA.

At least that’s what I’ve been saying for the last couple of weeks. Shrewd businessmen do not fire their GM because they’re getting / taking too much credit or avoiding blame (if that turns out to be the reason they let K.P. go). Shrewd businessmen are more interested in the results.

Instead, Paul Allen and The Cretins pour gasoline all over the front office, tie K.P. to a stake and light the match. Somehow they expect a top flight exec to want to come in and work in the newly redecorated office.

I honestly don’t care if P. Allen ever wins a championship in anything.

by LaughingJon on Jun 29, 2010 10:53 AM PDT reply actions  

I don’t think the Al Davis comparison is justified until PA goes over the heads of his scouts to take a chance on a player only he likes. Let’s see where this whole thing goes before we start comparing ourselves to one of the most tortured franchises in contemporary sport.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Jun 29, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

OK, but the Patty Mills deal is certainly a step in that direction

and it’s been said that P. Allen was basically bidding against himself on the Darius Miles contract fiasco.

by LaughingJon on Jun 29, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

since when do owners handle contract negotiations themselves? You really think he wanted to spend more of his own coin than necessary?

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

There's a difference between what Patty Mills cost the Blazers and Jamarcus Russel cost the Raiders.

Keeping a 15th man at the owner’s urging is orders of magnitude difference from blowing a #1 draft pick.

by raoulduke on Jun 29, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

only if he moves the team, particularly south.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jun 29, 2010 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

the Salem Blazers?

would I be out of the blackout area?

by Name's Ash on Jun 29, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

More like Mexico coast.... nice warm beaches

We need to expand international play. We have Toronto. We need the Yucatan Blazers !
I better not give them any ideas.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jun 29, 2010 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

PA could tie his yacht right off shore, and motor in for games.

We would have to keep Rudy though, and preferably get Sergio back. Talk about “large market”, dang !
Sounds better and better the more I think about it.

"You be realistic," Oden said. "I’m going to stay happy. All right?"

by Berkeley on Jun 29, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow.
Part Two: Paul Allen / Kevin Pritchard

Bill Simmons:

“Say something to the fans of Portland that talks them off the ledge.”

Chad Ford:

“Jump. My advice to you is jump. Because I think Paul Allen — we talked a little bit about this in the debate — has now entered the Donald Sterling zone.”

Bill Simmons:

“He’s Al Davis. He’s crazy Al Davis. It’s unbelievable.”

This hurts to hear, because there appears to be some truth to it. I wonder of PA even cares about what national writers think or are saying about him. This isn’t “Chump in Portland” saying this through a cloud of axe on local radio, this is Chad Ford and Bill Simmons saying the nastiest stuff I’ve heard yet about him. PA looks awful right now.

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Jun 29, 2010 10:56 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I really think they are probably hyping this up

but still, to fire a really good GM because there’s just something about him that pisses you off is pretty volatile.

by HailOden! on Jun 29, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

PA's oozing self-inflicted wound

There may be debate about whether or not there was some reasonable rationale for the firing, but there should be no debate over whether this incident damaged PA and the organization’s reputation. The damage is real and lasting.

It was precisely for this reason that I argued for months that firing KP would be proof that PA is a lousy businessman. Having spent hundreds of millions to “re-brand” the team after the Jail Blazer and arena bankruptcy debacles, PA then fired the very guy who was the public face of that re-branding. He alienated a significant portion of his fan base, harmed the team’s ability to attract top professionals, and made himself a national punchline. It really boggles the mind. It certainly creates an impression of a person completely lacking in emotional intelligence.

by upper left corner on Jun 29, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

+92

Phil Mickelson: "A Great shot is when you pull it off.....a smart shot is when you don't have the guts to try it"’

by 92wastheyear on Jun 29, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

PA must think the turnaround would have happened with anyone as GM

I could see him thinking that he made the decision the team’s culture had to change and KP was just following his orders and any GM could avoid crazy guys if that’s their job description. For me the biggest news from all this is that our owner is being compared to Al Davis. As someone who’s dad is a Raiders fan and witnessed Davis’ gradual slide from building contenders to “I’m worried he’s going to live forever” this puts me in a state of panic.

"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk

by terryisntbald on Jun 29, 2010 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

This isn’t "Chump in Portland" saying this through a cloud of axe on local radio

ROFL, and rec – Elgin

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Jun 29, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

As far as KP intentionally sabotaging the Portland's draft...

Nothing will make KP a more attractive potential hire than Elliot Williams and Luke Babbitt blowing up big time.

Imagine KP sitting at the big desk at the 2011 NBA Draft on ESPN and talking about how he picked Babbitt and Williams out of the big crowd and about how they’re now two more valuable young pieces Portland has.

Who wouldn’t want to hire that?

by Twith on Jun 29, 2010 10:58 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

If a reporter lends you his ear... play it like a fiddle.

Use the press to favor your professional well-being as they do you. I don’t see any reason not to keep the relationshipdsplff (cat) symbiotic, do you?

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Jun 29, 2010 11:00 AM PDT reply actions  

the problem is these NBA guys first convince guys to enter the draft, then slam them once they do. That’s not canny or clever, that’s sleazy.

by atomiccafe on Jun 29, 2010 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

you certainly have a point

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Jun 29, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

let's face it

The Blazers are a national joke again now, and Paul Allen is the punchline. It’s really a sad day. At least people seem to understand that we, the Blazers fans, are not fooled.

Greek tragedy always comes down to hubris – that is, egoic pride, and the downfall of a potentially great man due to his own flaws. Paul Allen could have been a hero in this city. He was on the way. Sure KP was getting love, but there was plenty of love to go around! If Paul had stayed the course and the Blazers emerged the way we thought they might, everyone would have loved the team owner and sang his praises.

Maybe things will work out OK for this team. But, the rub is, I don’t see this team as being just one or two obvious moves away from contention. We have some pieces, some great pieces, but to leverage what we have now into an actual championship contender is going to make at least one very major move. IMO. We have lots of ammo for such a deal, but it’ll be hard to do, and complicated…

…meaning it probably can’t be done without a great GM. You haters can snobs can bag on Ford and Simmons all you want, but they’re right about no good GM taking this job after the catastrophe. Danny Ferry? Are you joking? What’s he done except fail to put together a supporting cast for LeBron? This is the guy who thought Shaq and Jamison were the solution there! Pathetic. It’s a very similar situation in some ways – a deep pocketed owner and a team in need of a bold move. Instead they got Shaq and Jamison. You can argue the Shaq move was technically “bold” in the sense that most really stupid acts require some bravery to commit.

So, Mr. Paul Allen, once viewed as a poor owner, had remade his image basically by backing KP. He had done it. He was liked and respected again.

Now he’s being compared to the psychotic Sterling and delusional Al Davis.

Great.

Well played, rich man.

Way to cement your legacy.

by MrCompletely on Jun 29, 2010 11:31 AM PDT reply actions  

winning cures all

OJ Mayo is the Blazers' PG of the Future

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 29, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not if Paul Allen gets sick of being reminded KP drafted all the Blazers good players...

… and makes a new GM trade the players KP drafted for other players with no connection to KP.

They’d be trying to trade for equal value and keep a good squad with different faces. How often does that happen though?

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Jun 29, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Blazers are media fodder, but hardly a joke

mishandled as the turnover has been, it is the media’s audience that matters more than the media. From what we have recently been fed by the media, it is more plausible that Allen made these moves to improve the Blazers position relative to other management teams than any argument that the management upheaval was completely baseless.

Can we believe everything we are fed by sports journalism? Hardly. Was Paul Allen wrong to revamp his management team? Not if he manages to improve it.

by blacknoiseNW on Jun 29, 2010 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

lame

Ford got duped and he is whining about it. However, Williams is really injured, and he won’t be in Summer League, so it is “mostly” true.

PR wise the Blazers should have done a better job, and now pundits have something to point and laugh at regardless of what actually happened.

by Name's Ash on Jun 29, 2010 11:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Simmons has way too much presence

in NBA debates. Just read his treatise before this year’s playoffs started. Not to mention his admitted man-crush on Kevin Durant, which seems to necessitate him taking cheap shots at Greg Oden whenever he can, as if it will just further validate Simmons’ opinion. I like Ford, but Simmons should be ignored, unless he’s making Teen Wolf jokes.

by morg on Jun 29, 2010 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Totally out of control

They just want something to talk about until something actually interesting happens in the basketball world. Not that this whole KP thing isn’t interesting, but I’m so over it. It’s not that earth shaking.

by twggyy on Jun 29, 2010 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm now glad for LeBron signing

LeBron’s signing will sweep this draft night mess off the front pages.

Keep Portland Weird.

by Broy_07 on Jun 29, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

why all the hate on Simmons and Ford? I enjoyed the entirety of both parts of the podcast

Why are people on here hating on them, because they didn’t blow sunshine and rainbows when they talked about Portland???

They basically articulated what just about everyone nationally thinks about it – that KP got hosed right before the draft, that he handled himself with class, and that they wouldn’t have necessarily taken the higher road like Pritchard did.

by rip_city_swagger on Jun 29, 2010 12:31 PM PDT reply actions  

Actually him not blowing sunshine and rainbows is why

Now any time Simmons says anything about Portland there are people that look for even the slightest insult. In a column a while ago he said our fans were so loud at a game they started affecting the refs and he ended with “and that’s a complement” but Ben still posted that article here and there were tons of comments about how he’s a hater. Some Blazer fans remind me of the pigeon in the Goodfeathers, or if you didn’t watch Animaniacs then Joe Pesci in the Goodfellas, where they’re looking for any insult so they can react.

"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk

by terryisntbald on Jun 29, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't agree with what Ford said about Williams

I mean, why should the media get “pure” information about draft prospects, who wants to pick who, etc etc. The media are just as self serving as any NBA team, and the NBA teams have a lot more riding on picking the right person than the media do. Elliot Williams and his manager seem to shut down/be quiet as well, it’s not like they were out saying, “It’s not a bad injury”.

by kanakatru on Jun 29, 2010 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just beef with Simmons because he

forgets that he so desperately wanted Oden back in that draft. He would wax poetically about how the opportunity of getting Oden was like when the Celtics had the chance to get Tim Duncan back in the day. He also lived with the fact that Celtics were clearly tanking (I mean Paul Pierce just suddenly has knee troubles in late January, when he was doing his thing up to that point?) for a shot at Oden. I use to enjoy reading Simmons because of his humor and decent analysis (albeit through green glasses), but once he started jocking KD for every potential kid he has and took shots at Greg, I quit reading. I can’t stand a hypocrite and that is exactly what he is. Bill lives in denial for wanting Greg and since he has such a presence in the new age of sports writing/reading he wants to expunge any record of having a desire for Greg and jealousy that the Blazers (who gave it their all, even at 32-50) beat his glorious and silver spooned Boston Celtics of 2006-2007 tanking lore. What a bum.

by kicknowledge on Jun 29, 2010 12:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Simmons has been consistently open

about his desire for Kevin Durant, even before the draft. He may have talked about ODen during the season, but once the draft neared he was full on in heat over Durant. It’s one of the few things he’s gotten right, which is why he’s so outspoken about it. re: Insisting that Emeka Okafor should be the first pick over Dwight Howard.

by morg on Jun 29, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

right

so he was one of a handful of media guys that felt that way. That does not mean any one of the 29 other GMs would not have made the same pick. Again this debate will settle itself when either OKC or PDX brings home that trophy and the rings that go with it.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jun 29, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

well, he's right on both counts though

getting Oden was like the Spurs getting Duncan – a really good team that had the amazing luck of getting the #1 pick in a year when there was a dominant big man available

AND he’s right – as much as I hate to admit at – that so far, The Blazers totally whiffed on that draft pick, as KD is All-NBA first team and Oden can’t stay on the court. That may change with time if Oden can stay healthy and produce, but as of now, that’s where it is

by rip_city_swagger on Jun 29, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

would he be peeved if lj smokescreened him or would he ask lebron to please pull down his shorts so he could give him another kiss

with all the lebron stories out there someone is wrong. i think theres alot of smokescreening going on prob just so lj can stay in the limelight and cmon how many reporters are going to whine about it.

by Captain fruit on Jun 29, 2010 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

The revisionism going on in regards to KP makes me sick

Ak has issues that the guy was severely honored by portland fans, but his moves, his decisions, and the culture he helped foster have been good and healthy for the team.

He never took credit but gave credit to others and the Portland Fans gave credit to him as the one who helped turn an unhealthy organization into something functional.

Hindsight is 20/20 and as I mentioned way back when Oden just had to be good to propel the blazers, Durant had to be amazing. Durant has been amazing, Oden was expected to be amazing but hasn’t even been good yet because he’s not healthy

"We get to hit arms! Cool!"

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html

by ratbastird on Jun 29, 2010 1:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah

I still really think that the beginning of the end was last summer when Larry Miller had to step in and negotiate those contracts. Allen lost trust in KP at that point, that was clear.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jun 29, 2010 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love the revisionist history on the Oden Durant debate

Nobody honestly questioned that decision when it was actually made.

And Presti has not done anything spectacular yet. That team has improved, we will see what their ceiling is.

Besides Oden could end up being a monster in this league yet.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jun 29, 2010 9:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm