Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

My final projection for how much cap space teams will have

Whew!  Well, once again, draft day provided drama and surprises – and a number of trades that will affect the amount of cap space that teams will have next week when the free agent period begins.

I’m not going to cover each team’s cap room situation, but I will hit each of the nine teams that I have identified previously as potentially having significant (ie, greater than MLE-level) cap space.

And I’m continuing to use $56.1 million as the projected cap figure.  The actual figure should be released on July 7th.   I’ve tried again to make the best assumptions possible about team options, player options, guaranteed contracts and ETOs, so please let me know if I’ve made a mistake in predicting which contracts are likely and which are unlikely to actually count in next season’s figures.

One last point.  This projection is static.  By that I mean that it is a snapshot view of where each of these teams will be once the July Moratorium is lifted.  However, because most of these teams will have cap holds that will be removed as the summer progresses, the actual amount of free agent money spent (or the amount of actual cap space lost in a lopsided trade) could be higher than the snapshot picture of cap space that a team will have available on July 8th.  Let me give you an example to illustrate:

Say that Team X has $20,000,000 in cap space on July 8th and that their team salary figure includes two cap holds of $473,604 each for having less than 12 players on the roster.  Team X signs Player Y for a contract that pays him $10,000,000 in 2010-11.  You’d expect the team to now have $10,000,000 in cap space, right?  But in actuality, since the signing of Player Y also eliminated one of those minimum salary cap holds, the actual amount of cap space that Team X now has is $10,473,604.  Similarly, if they then signed Player Z to another $10,000,000 contract, the amount of cap space would now be $947,208, which could be used to sign a 3rd player.  So even though the static snapshot of cap space on July 8th was $20 million, due to the presence of cap holds that eventually dropped off, the team would be able to actually sign players that combined for a total of $20,947,208.  I hope that makes sense….

The other issue with this being a static projection is that there is the chance that, due to free agents leaving or other trades being made, teams other than these nine might be significantly under the cap at some point this summer.  I’ll cross that bridge if/when it happens.  For now, here is the snapshot view of where these nine teams will be once the Moratorium is lifted on July 8th:

——————————

CHICAGO is rumored to be in line to trade Kirk Hinrich and the rights to Kevin Seraphin to Washington for a future 2nd round pick.  Assuming this trade occurs immediately after the June Moratorium is lifted, the Bulls will have 5 players under guaranteed contracts for 2010-11 in Deng, Rose, Noah, Johnson and Gibson.  I’m also assuming that both Chris Richard and Rob Kurz, with their non-guaranteed contracts, are released for maximum cap savings.  If the Bulls renounce their rights to all free agents, they could have $29.93 million in cap room, after accounting for 7 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster.

LA CLIPPERS currently have Baron Davis, Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon and Blake Griffin under contract for 2010-11.  Cap holds for 1st round picks Aminu and Bledsoe are in play totaling $3.37 million.  I’m assuming that DeAndre Jordan will be retained and that his full contract will count against the cap but that all their free agents will be renounced (including Mardy Collins, who does not get a qualifying offer in this scenario).  After accounting for 5 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, the Clippers look to have $16.33 million in cap room.

MIAMI currently has only Michael Beasley and Mario Chalmers fully guaranteed for 2010-11.  I’m assuming that Joel Anthony does not pick up his player option.  Finally, I’m assuming that they will renounce all their free agents and that the team does not retain James Jones, so that only the guaranteed amount of his contract ($1.86 million) counts against the cap.  Now, for the tough part – how to count Dwyane Wade who is 99.99% likely to not pick up his player option.  For simplicity’s sake, let’s assume that the team does not retain Bird rights on Wade, which allows us to see the maximum amount of cap space that the Heat can have regardless of whether Wade stays or leaves.  In the end, after accounting for 10 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, Miami looks to have $43.69 million in cap space.

MINNESOTA currently has Jefferson, Webster, Sessions, Love, Flynn, Brewer, Hollins and Ellington guaranteed for 2010-11.  The cap holds for 1st round picks Johnson and Hayward total $3.96 million.  Rubio’s cap hold will also be in play at $2.81 million.  Finally, I’m assuming that they do not retain Steimsma’s non-guaranteed contract and that they renounce all rights to their free agents, which means that a single cap hold of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster would be applied.  All this would leave the Timberwolves with $13.15 million in cap room.

NEW JERSEY currently has Harris, Jianlian, Lopez, Lee and Williams guaranteed for 2010-11.   I am assuming that Humphries picks up his player option.  The cap holds for 1st round picks Favors and James total $4.41 million.  I’m also assuming that they will release Dooling so that only the $500,000 guaranteed portion of his salary is applied against the cap.  Finally, I’m assuming that Josh Boone does not get a qualifying offer and that they renounce all rights to their free agents, which means that there will be 4 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster.   This would leave the Nets with $27.09 million in cap room.

NEW YORK currently has only Curry, Gallinari, Chandler and Douglas guaranteed for 2010-11.   I am assuming that the team does not waive Bill Walker and his non-guaranteed contract, that they do not tender a qualifying offer to Sergio Rodriguez and that they renounce all rights to their other free agents.  After accounting for 7 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, the Knicks would be left with $34.15 million in cap room.

OKLAHOMA CITY currently has Collison, Peterson, Krstic, Durant, Harden, Westbrook, Green, Sefolosha, Cook, Maynor, Mullens, White and Ibaka under contract for 2010-11.  The cap hold for 1st round pick Aldrich will be $1.77 million.  Finally, I’m assuming that the team waives Weaver and his non-guaranteed contract and that they renounce all rights to their free agents.  This would leave the Thunder with $6.43 million in cap room.  Although the team looked to have significantly more cap space just a week ago, the trades that brought them Cook and Peterson cut heavily into the amount of cap space available.

SACRAMENTO currently has Dalembert, Udrih, Garcia, Evans, Landry, Thompson, Greene and Casspi under contract for 2010-11.  The cap hold for 1st round pick Cousins will be $2.81 million.  Finally, I’m assuming that all rights to their free agents are renounced.  After accounting for 3 cap holds of $473,604 each for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, this would leave the Kings with $15.37 million in cap space.

WASHINGTON – After making the assumed trade with Chicago, the Wizards will have  Arenas, Hinrich, Blatche, Thornton, Young and McGee with guaranteed contracts for 2010-11.  I’m also assuming that Ross picks up his player option, that the Wizards do not pick up the team option for Howard and that Foye does not get a qualifying offer.  The cap holds for 1st round picks Wall, Seraphin and Booker will total $6.59 million.  After accounting for 2 cap holds for having fewer than 12 players on their roster, Washington could have $10.38 million in cap space.

————————–

Because of recent trades and transactions this past week:

The Bulls increased the amount of cap space they will have dramatically, going from just under $20 million to nearly $30 million.

The Heat also increased their amount of projected cap space, going from just over $41 million to just under $44 million.

The Nets and the Knicks did not see their amount of projected cap space change much, if at all.

The Clippers, Timberwolves and Kings each look to have $2-4 million less in cap space than they did in my last projection.

The Wizards cut their amount of projected cap space almost in half, going from nearly $20 million to just over $10 million.

And, finally, the Thunder went from having over $14 million in projected cap space to now looking to have just over $6 million.  They might still be a player in free agency, but with little more to offer than teams with the MLE, they no longer look to be a major player.



Comment 75 comments  |  16 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow

I had no idea Miami had that much cap space.

Nice job btw. Rec for you.

by jamon51 on Jun 26, 2010 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Well

There goes the Thunder going for David Lee (That would have been my guess anyway). They must either really like Aldrich, or be willing to sacrifice the scoring and rebounding for defense.

In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! "I hope I'll be safe at home!"
-George Carlin (RIP)

by Taskmaster on Jun 26, 2010 3:28 PM PDT reply actions  

They are very much a defensive team

and David Lee can’t guard a 7 foot chair. They have all the scoring they need, but a defensive post presence is what they have really lacked. If Aldrich ends up being Joel Przybilla 2.0 for the Thunder, no one will remember in a few years that the Thunder passed up a shot at David Lee.

by HailOden! on Jun 26, 2010 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm a little fuzzy on values for max contracts

How much can be offered to free agents? Does time in the league play a role? How much can be offered in a re-signing, or a sign and trade? I assume it also depends on the actual salary cap.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 3:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Max salary depends on a player's years in the league.

It is based on the league’s BRI (basketball related income) each year and won’t be known exactly until July 7 for the upcoming year.

Lebron & Bosh both have 7 years in the league and last year the max salary was $16,224,600 for 7 year players.

The max amounts a team can offer its own free agents is the same, but they can offer 6 year contracts while other teams can only offer 5 year contracts. A team can sign its own free agent and immediately trade them, but only with the consent of the free agent, and they can’t back out. i.e. they must trade the player if the player consents to a sign and trade deal.

If I messed any of that up, someone will quickly correct it.

"Brandon eats first around here" - KP

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 26, 2010 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought the team re-signing could offer a higher actual dollar amount

Or at least higher raises, or something.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes

10.5% raises per year instead of 8%, and 6 years instead of 5. Starting amount stays the same I believe.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jun 26, 2010 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Correct

The starting amount for max guys is identical for any team- the # of years and max raises possible are the differences

by dprodigy19 on Jun 30, 2010 2:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

BlazerFanSince1970 pretty much has it right

The exception is when a player (such as James or Wade or Bosh) is already coming off a large contract. If 105% of their previous salary is larger than the calculated max amount that BFS1970 mentions, then they are allowed to sign for 105% of their previous salary. It’s a situation where ‘whichever is larger’ comes into play.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK, that is consistent with what I'm reading elsewhere

But I swear I’ve heard (on ESPN and somewhere else?) that James and others have a higher max and/or higher raises (not just a longer contract) if they stay with their current teams. Clearly, that sounds wrong. Any idea on the reason for the misinformation?

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

if they extend their current deals they could start higher

but none of them are doing that.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Jun 26, 2010 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, yes, that is true

If James exercises his player option for 2010-11 before June 30th, then he’ll make more than he could as a FA. The same is true of Wade and Bosh.

But, no, I don’t expect any of the big name free agents to do that….

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nobody can sign James for more than $16.57 million in 2010-11

(unless, of course, the new cap is crazy-higher than what everyone expects)

James can get larger annual raises and a contract one year longer if he signs with Cleveland instead of another team – that’s the benefit of Bird Rights. But his starting salary can be just as high if another team has enough cap room to sign him as a FA.

The same is true of Wade, Bosh and any other free agent.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Got it

I didn’t realize exactly how Bird Rights worked. Max 10.5% raises instead of 8%. That means if James re-signed with Bird Rights, he could have a 5 year deal worth about $100.25 million, vs about $96.15 million as a FA. I realize he could also do a 6th with Bird, but I wanted to see the direct comparison. So that would be a difference of about 4 million, or 4% of the total contract.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ah, I just figured out the source of my confusion

He could actually start the contract higher if he did so as an extension. It would be a 10.5% raise from this year, rather than a 5%. So he would start at $17.44 million, and a 5 year contract would be $105.5 million. That’s getting pretty close to $10 million over signing with another team. I’d think he’d be pretty unhappy in Cleveland to pass up that much money. Or he thinks he can earn more in endorsements if he leaves.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, and dan_the_man

don’t feel bad about being ‘fuzzy’ about max contract amounts. The rules can get very complex and confusing.

LeBron’s max contract amount does not equal Pierce’s max contract amount which does not equal David Lee’s max contract amount.

Yeah, it can get confusing….

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Free agent bonanza

Great work, Storyteller.

The most interesting thing to me is how many mid to low level free agents will be available, with teams looking to drop every possible dollar. There are going to be a number of guys with some value signing for minimum contracts.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Jun 26, 2010 3:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Mike Rice had a good point

Teams that miss out on the big name F/A and are left with money to spend could drive up the price on a guy like Mike Miller or some of the other players projected to get paid in the MLE range.

by King Mar on Jun 26, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's a possibility

As is the chance that we see guys on teams with nasty cap situations like Andre Iguodala get moved, sort of like free agents. Considering the swingman class after the max-level free agents, this could be a reasonable tact for some teams.

by dprodigy19 on Jun 30, 2010 2:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks Professor, this is great.

So now the fun questions -

1. Which “big” free agents will be the losers when music stops? Who’s still standing when the only chairs left open are Minn and Sac?

2. Which of these teams (Chicago, NY, NJ, Miami) risked it all and will come up with the least?

3. Could the Clippers still miss the playoffs if they get Lebron? Ok, bad question, of course they could, they’re the Clippers. So forget that one, I need a new question 3 -

What team is the most likely to get Lebron if he brushes off all these teams and decides on a sign and trade?

"Brandon eats first around here" - KP

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 26, 2010 4:12 PM PDT reply actions  

My guesses

1) David Lee? Rudy Gay?

2) New York

3) Portland….. :)

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

If it's all about winning...

Then LeBron forces a S&T to the Lakers.

It’s not like he can’t earn big deals in LA with his buddies if Kobe is there. Bryant will retire one day, then LeBron is the new alpha. Some have suggested using LeBron in NY like Magic, but why not LA if Phil and the triangle really do leave?

This will never happen. But then again… Shaq ditched his Southern roots for the money and glamour. One time occurrence right? It’s not like LA gets big stars to come together like a Dream Team, right?

"The problem actually is that PER is a extra-long, double high wagon load of horse crap." - timbo (7/3/09)

by tandur on Jun 26, 2010 11:54 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Chicago did well for itself.

Everybody talks about the capspace, but nobody has mentioned the HUGE $9M trade exception they can use to supplement their free agent signings.

I thought OKC used its capspace expertly to improve its roster and acquire more draft assets. Minnesota, in stark contrast, wasted a great opportunity.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Jun 26, 2010 4:16 PM PDT reply actions  

They can't have a $9M trade exception AND be $30M under the cap.

Exceptions are lost when the team salary cap room drops below the exception level.

"Brandon eats first around here" - KP

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 26, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't explain that very clearly.

Exceptions are lost when the team salary cap room is greater than the exception. i.e. if you add the exception amount to the team salary and the resulting total is still below the salary cap, then the exception is lost.

"Brandon eats first around here" - KP

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 26, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Could they use the exception once their cap room is less than the exception value again?

Or is it a case of, when it’s gone, it’s gone?

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jun 26, 2010 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have to renounce exceptions to use cap space.

Once you do that they’re gone.

Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.

by pualo on Jun 26, 2010 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

Once you are officially under the cap, you lose all exceptions that your team has accumulated to that point. This makes sense, right? The basic rule of the salary cap is that you have to be below that figure. In order to make a transaction if you are above that figure, you need to utilize an exception to the basic rule. So if you aren’t breaking the rule (ie, you are below the cap), by definition you neither need or can use exceptions to the rule.

As BFS1970 points out, it’s possible to have a total team salary that’s below the cap but still be officially above the cap because of exceptions. But once you are officially below the cap, all exceptions generated to that point are gone.

Once a team goes above the cap again, they can start generating new exceptions but can never get back the ones they lost.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

ahhh

my mistake. i didn’t know that was the case. thanks for pointing it out.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Jun 26, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chicago's big draw is the players they DO have

Miami has all that cap room, but no assurance that the bench isn’t going to end up being journeyman/D-league types, especially if they blow all the money on the max contracts.

Rose and Noah is a pretty decent foundation, especially if Deng is still around.

by superfly05 on Jun 27, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Noboby seems to remember

besides signing big free agents each team will have to spend money to fill out the roster leaving less.

by BBallBrent on Jun 26, 2010 4:36 PM PDT reply actions  

You can go over the cap for minimum contracts I believe. I expect to see a lot of those.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jun 26, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Once a team uses up its cap room, they can once again use exceptions to make transactions that leave them above the cap. The most popular one we’ll probably see this summer is the Minimum Player Exception.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I'm not mistaken

They can use some exceptions, but not all of them. The Magic had to renounce the MLE (and the LLE or BAE, if memory serves) to sign Rashard Lewis.

by dprodigy19 on Jun 30, 2010 2:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think any team can sign 3 max guys

..and still fulfill the minimum roster requirements.

by Taylor Bartle on Jun 26, 2010 4:44 PM PDT reply actions  

can you win a championship

with LeBron, Bosh, Wade and 9 Adam Morrisons?

by Taylor Bartle on Jun 26, 2010 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think you wouldn't take Adam Morrisons...

You’d take athletic D-league young guys. Fringe 2nd rounders/undrafteds.

Considering how little those other guys would have the ball in their hands, it would be all about getting guys with 1 definite skill: perimeter D, shotblocking, hitting 3’s…that kind of thing.

So it’s more like 9 Tollivers and the other guys that GS picked up from the D-league last season, most of whom fared well. Also a couple vets like Stackhouse or Finley or Juwan.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Jun 26, 2010 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, in Miami's case

they’d have Wade, James, Bosh plus Chalmers and maybe even Beasley….

plus a bunch of minimum salary players. Not all need be as bad as Morrison. For example, Juwan Howard was a minimum salary player. Anthony Morrow was a minimum salary player. Mbah a Moute was a minimum salary player.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

not gonna have Wade, James, Bosh and Beasley

unless one or more of the big 3 takes less than max money…

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Jun 26, 2010 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very true

or if they all take $14.7 million instead of $16.6 million….

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

fat chance...

honestly, I don’t see 3 ending up together, not this early in their careers, and especially not for less than max. Who’s gonna sign up to be the 3rd wheel? That’s a huge loss of touches, stats, prestige, and likely all star games and all nba teams.

two going together? now that I could see. LBJ and Bosh make the most since. Wade and LBJ together doesn’t seem like a good fit to me at all.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Jun 26, 2010 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, yeah

I can see Wade and Stoudemire in Miami

Bosh and Gay in New Jersey

Maybe James and Johnson joining Rose in Chicago – but Johnson would be such a 3rd wheel, even more than Allen has become in Boston….

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rather than Joe Johnson, the Chicago Bulls should instead spend its money ...

on a power forward — even if it’s a second or third tier guy like Carlos Boozer or David Lee — because Taj Gibson is better suited for backup duty. Meanwhile, an adequate shooting guard — who can hit it from downtown — are a dime a dozen, especially between two high-usage guys like LeBron James and Derrick Rose.

by AK1984 on Jun 26, 2010 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

A guy like Ben Wallace would thrive around Chris Bosh, Joe Johnson, Dwyane Wade, and ...

Mario Chalmers. With that said, I still highly doubt that LeBron James goes to Miami with Wade.

Cleveland, Chicago, and even New York or New Jersey — particularly if the Knicks can also get Amar’e Stoudemire — make more sense for James than Miami, as him and Wade may very well clash stylistically on the court.

by AK1984 on Jun 26, 2010 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wallace?

A little past his prime, wouldn’t you say? He seems pretty much done since the injuries…

by HailOden! on Jun 27, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Surprisingly, Ben Wallace was one of the few bright spots for the Detroit Pistons ...

this past season. Even at 35, Wallace started 67 games and gutted it out defensively on a squad full of sieves on that end of the court. So, if Wallace was to join a stacked Miami Heat squad, he’d likely fit in nicely as a complementary piece. Another veteran who’d be worth looking at is Brad Miller, as he could offer everything that Wallace can’t as a player.

Without a doubt, it’s good to have guys who bring different skill sets to the table.

by AK1984 on Jun 27, 2010 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I show Memphis at about

$5.8 million under the cap, but that’s before considering either Gay or Brewer.

If they re-sign Gay, they’ll definitely be over the cap.

When they re-sign Brewer (I think this is almost certainly a given), their team salary figure might still be less than the cap, but not by more than the MLE. It wouldn’t make any sense for them to renounce their MLE and BAE, so they will officially still be over the cap.

If they re-sign both, they’ll be not only over the cap, they’ll be pushing up against the tax threshold.

That’s why I don’t consider them a major player in free agency with cap room this summer.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

How do you see the drafting on Henry affecting them?

Since Henry (and presumably Mayo, though he could be logging some heavy PG minutes) is a natural SG, it seems weird that they would draft a guy to immediately play him out of position.

Not saying it’s impossible they re-sign him, of course, just that it is less likely now.

by dprodigy19 on Jun 30, 2010 2:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

OKC fan here

I’ve been told Morris Peterson has a 10% trade kicker on his contract. Is this incorporated here?

by slick watts on Jun 26, 2010 5:25 PM PDT reply actions  

His trade kicker is actually 7.5% from the information I have been given

and yes, it is incorporated here. I show his bonus to be $465,000 once the trade is actually consummated, bringing his cap hit to $6,665,000 for 2010-11.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 26, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Awesome work Storyteller! Thank you!

When he wakes up in bed tomorrow I'll be right there next to him saying "Brandon I like you just the way you are". - Mike Rice

by pxilpooshr on Jun 26, 2010 6:02 PM PDT reply actions  

depth

 
“can you win a championship with LeBron, Bosh, Wade and 9 Adam Morrisons?”

Something I’ve been wondering as well.

Although, the NBA champion Lakers have one of the shallowest rosters in the league, so depth is not all it’s cracked up to be.

However, even though all their non rotation players are worthless, they do still have 7 or 8 good players in their rotation. (it would have been funny if the Lakers had had a plague of injuries like the Blazers did, then the Lakers would have been competing with the Nets for worst all-time regular season record in the NBA).

But, anyway, they got the job done with only 7 or 8 NBA caliber players.

But if Miami has a team of 3 all stars and the rest of the team are minor leaguers, can they really win a championship?

I doubt it but I don’t think we’ll ever find out because these teams like Miami probably won’t land the blue chip free agents anyway, and will wind up using most of their cap space on guys like Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw.

by lsjogren on Jun 26, 2010 6:58 PM PDT reply actions  

It would be funny...

…and I’m praying like crazy that they do too, starting with good ol’ #24

Blazers win!

by The X-man on Jun 26, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Boston kind of did that

although they did have a cheap Rondo coming off his rookie year.

still, figure they would have a starting lineup of Chalmers, Wade, LBJ, Bosh, and player X. Now, they go out and find some long in the tooth veterans who want to win, and sign them all minimum deals – that’s still like a million a year. They could probably snag 2 or 3 guys like that – and ones that can still play. Fill in the roster with rookies and stuff. Maybe it’s not enough to get them past the ECF next year. But then they can add on an MLE and BAE player in summer 11 (new CBA notwithstanding), and that’s looking pretty scary.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Jun 26, 2010 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dr. Story Teller

Thank you very much for sharing your hard work and knowledge. It is very much appreciated by us all and I’m sure other bloggers.

     Thank you kind sir

by elkaholic84 on Jun 26, 2010 7:31 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

This.

Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.

by dpnim on Jun 26, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

This.

Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.

by dpnim on Jun 26, 2010 7:42 PM PDT reply actions  

2 questions

1) if LBJ resigns in Cleveland for the max, what will he make per year?
2) if he signs for another team for the max, what will he make per year?

by ItsMrHarris2u on Jun 26, 2010 10:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Here's the difference over the course of five years

If he signs with CLE (either to stay or as a S&T):
2010-11: $16,568,909
2011-12: $18,308,644
2012-13: $20,048,380
2013-14: $21,788,115
2014-15: $23,527,851

If he signs with anyone else:
2010-11: $16,568,909
2011-12: $17,894,422
2012-13: $19,219,934
2013-14: $20,545,447
2014-15: $21,870,960

He could also get an additional year (2015-16) by signing with Cleveland.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 27, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

interesting

So the 1st year cap hold is identical for any team that would sign him. He simply makes more later, and possibly longer, if he resigns with Cleveland.

If I assume the salaries are the same maxed out for Bosh and Wade, I only see two teams that can sign two of the big three. NY with ~34mil and Miami with ~44mil.

When people say that Chicago is going to sign both Bosh and James, do they assume Bosh is going to take less then max? I’m confused here. It seems like common knowledge that Bosh, Wade and James will each get the max.

by ItsMrHarris2u on Jun 27, 2010 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep, max is same for James, Bosh and Wade

How can Chicago get 2 max guys? The simple answer is that they can’t unless they can unload more guaranteed salary. Which they could do. But right now, yeah, they don’t have enough cap room. I’ve seen the columns, too – but the most informed Bulls fans agree with me that Chicago is not quite there yet.

This post over at Blog-A-Bull suggests a theory that the Bulls will sign either James or Bosh for the max as well as Joe Johnson for less than the max.

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 27, 2010 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you very much Storyteller

Sacramento looks like a real dark horse here – they have stockpiled some very good players to go around a superstar.

Too bad no one wants to live and play in Sac (any more than they want to live in Portland). – Elgin

GOP in HD

by 22baylor on Jun 27, 2010 4:35 PM PDT reply actions  

My folks used to live in Sacramento

They call it the tree capital of the world, saying it has more trees per capita than any other city. Personally, I think there are more trees per capita in Portland, but whatever…..

I don’t see any big names this year going to Sac Town – not when they are in competition with the likes of New York, Chicago and even LA. Most athletes do prefer a larger city….

"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY

by Storyteller on Jun 27, 2010 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm