Please educate me on this, but from my point of view we traded a guy who shoots the three with the best of em, who can't penetrate, score off the dribble, or create much offense outside of the spot up jumper/three and occasional fast break bucket but DOES play solid Defense for a ROOKIE who is a relative unknown(for me) and the best i can figure out is a good shooter.
My understanding is that......whats his name, the white guy........is as good, if not a better shooter than Martell but comes at a much cheaper price. Ok, i buy that at face value but when you look at our progression, either its part of a bigger plan i dont understand or we just cut costs. Why, if we are pushing toward a title (haha, no K.P. Disaray, etc)would we be cutting costs? I am confounded by our path we have taken. Help me Bedgers to understand and see the positive here. We need us some positive.