Quick indicating CP3 was the All Star KP was trying to trade for
It was 4 Blazer players for CP3 and another Hornets player. Says Hornets have disengaged in talks. It was on MSP this morning. By the way, Nick Batum was in the deal. It also sounds like Oden or LMA could've been involved....though not sure why NO would want LMA if they already have West. Nevertheless, the package was not enough for New Orleans. I am encouraged that KP is thinking big.
almost 2 years ago
JasonT
63 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Just another reason why I don't pay attention to Quick's "breaking news"
I have a scoop! The Portland TrailBlazers are trying to acquire Lebron James! Oh, but talks fell through, not going to happen
This cracks me up. Quick says we are pursuing an all-star, and of course it’s Chris Paul, who the Hornets will never give up and who is every Blazers’ fan pipe dream. It’s just hilarious how Quick makes it sounds real and something that could very well happen, when the whole time it’s just smoke
Since that draft EVERYONE has clamored to get Paul, the player we SHOULD have drafted. I can’t even count how many times I’ve read on BEdge about scenarios to get him. I mean, I get it, we need a PG and he’s the best PG in the league. But common.
Just another example of Quick promoting BS so he can get a headline and media play
by rip_city_swagger on Jun 22, 2010 10:01 AM PDT reply actions
How did he make it sound like a done deal? He couldn't even talk about it until it fell through the floor.
[insert witty nomenclature and/or out of context quote from someone that makes more money than I]
by HallelujahHoeDown on Jun 22, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
yeah but the point is - it was ALWAYS going to fall through the floor
like I said above – it’s like claiming we’re after an all-star, and then a week later revealing it was Lebron and it fell through
NO KIDDING IT FELL THROUGH. The Hornets are not trading Paul, and if they did we’d have to give up Roy or LMA to get him
I just think it’s garbage to write and hype that we’re going after an all-star and making it seem like it’s a tangible and real position – only for us to realize later it was for a player that wasn’t ever going to be traded – just pointless
by rip_city_swagger on Jun 22, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions
For those of us without the gift of precognition
We are stuck to the wait and see approach. I don’t share your flare for the dramatic nor your proclivity to hyperbole.
[insert witty nomenclature and/or out of context quote from someone that makes more money than I]
by HallelujahHoeDown on Jun 22, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I wanna hear about this stuff
It beats hearing about the 500th draft prospect that probably won’t be in the NBA in two years.
It’s also sort of his job to bring up this kind of rumor. He didn’t say it was immanent; just that it was being discussed. A trade for CP3 is news. No ifs, ands, or buts. Even if it’s in preliminary, non-inevitable stages.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
ok then you'll love this news!!!!!!
Portland is trying to trade for Lebron
Portland is trying to trade for Dwayne Wade
Portland is trying to trade for Kobe
Portland is trying to trade for Dwight Howard
Portland is trying to trade for Deron Williams
Portland is trying to trade for Rajon Rondo
Al just as likely to happen as trading for Chris Paul. But you like thin kind of news so this should keep you busy this offseason!
by rip_city_swagger on Jun 22, 2010 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow super snotty for someone that's making no sense
Were they talking about it? YES
Was a deal proposed? YES!!!!!!!
Was there a deal for Lebron?
Was there a deal for Kobe?
Was there a deal for Dwight Howard?
Was there a deal for Deron Williams?
Was there a deal for Rajon Rondo?
None. So, no they’re not all just as likely to happen. They’re not being discussed. Your argument reminds me of an irrational, jilted lover over-reaching for insults and making comments that don’t even border on plausibility. Serious logical leaps. Too far to be taken seriously.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
KP has probably proposed deals to get half the players in the league.
Including some on that list.
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
dude u need to chilax...
it’s the off season. i rather be optimistic and hear this stuff than Blazers headquarters firing everyones butts.
by Hoi on Jun 22, 2010 8:21 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
If it's true, I'm glad KPs swinging for the fences.
But I have a small feeling JQuick used the recent CP3 rumors to cloak his own.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
So...
KP as an Asst. GM pushed hard for the Blazers to move up and draft Chris Paul in 2005. However, PA fell in love with Martell Webster during his workout in Portland so the Blazers drafted Webster straight out of high school. 5 years later, Martell has underachieved, the Blazers have struggled at PG, KP has been promoted to GM but his job is in peril, and in a desparate attempt to to save it, he tries to trade significant pieces of the team he built for the guy he wanted to draft in 2005 in the 1st place.
Yep, that makes sense.
uh...
blazers weren’t pushing hard to move up..they had the pick and they traded down because they didn’t need paul…they had just drafted the amazing sebastian telfair as their future dominating point guard star.
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
by Tofu Anonymous on Jun 22, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
It was even worse than I remembered.
My version makes the team look less dysfuntional than the truth. Depressing.
But hey, we also got the pick for Linas Kleiza/Jarrett Jack in that deal, so trading down for Martell was totally worth it in the end
What would the T-Wolves do?
"I'm passing it down," Howard said. "Showing the guys that, hey, here's an example of a guy who played 16 years. If you don't want to listen and get the valuable, free information from him - soak it up like a sponge - then you've got to be a damn fool."
actually...
I belive CP was picked before Martell and the reason why is becuz the blazers didn’t move up but moved back n selected Martel, I’m sure that was the yr we were projected to get 1 pick but didn’t.
by Hoi on Jun 22, 2010 8:25 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
like I said earlier
sometimes the best deals are the ones the other GM doesn’t let you make
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Jun 22, 2010 11:48 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
If I cared about my sig at all, I'd quote that in there
excellent work!
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
I listened
and it sounded like Batum was NOT offered by Blazers and that it may have been a sticking point. He only said the “other team” asked about Batum, and also said Batum was the only player other than Roy that approached “untouchable” status … that our unwillingness to let him go was preventing a number of potential trades. It was interesting to hear, however, that LMA and Oden were more available than Batum.
by unemployedreflection on Jun 22, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions
i heard the same thing
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
listen to the part after Quick is off the air....it was later reported that indeed Batum was included in the discussions
and that it was New Orleans that pulled out…not Portland…Portland was willing to include Batum…but New Orleans still said no.
thanks
that was probably when I was in between the car and my desk.
That makes sense. If KP was holding up the deal because of Batum, that would be silly, and I LOVE Batum.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
NOLA has been getting offers from everyone
and saying no to them all
I’m guessing no Roy, no CP3. They want an all-star, and probably an inexpensive one
As much as pairing CP3 with Roy is a good idea, sacrificing the potential of Oden and Batum is not a prospect that I particularly relish
Miller+Webster+Rudy+22+34+Euros+SPAM for Tony Parker
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
ORL offered Nelson and Carter.
That might not be bad, but there’d have to be something more of value.
If that's true, then KP has lost his mind in an effort to save his job.
That is something I feared and mentioned about a week ago. He could convince PA to do something very big, but very stupid, in a last ditch effort to impress Allen and save his job.
Trading Oden at this point is unthinkable. No point guard, including CP3 is going to stop Gasol, Bynum, and Kobe without a dominant big man.
Not trading Batum for CP3 is just plain crazy. I love Batum’s potential too, but good heavens, people are treating Batum like he is already Pippen in his prime, and I’d trade that Pippen for CP3.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Oooh, now that's a good question
Prime Pippen for what we think is prime CP3? I’m not sure. Pippen was pretty amazing. I’ll lean your direction, but mostly just because I can’t think of another way to lean.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Yeah, prime Pippen was really good.
But playing next to MJ was a big advantage that made him even better. Prime Pippen and Roy would have really been good too. Maybe a better combination than Roy and CP3. But CP3 would do more for LMA and Oden’s game than Pippen could, I think. Tough call.
But my original point is that Batum isn’t Pippen, prime or well-aged, and he has a long way to go to get there. I’m very, very high on Batum, and I wouldn’t trade him for less than an all-star right now, but it’s not even close to a sure thing he reaches Pippen’s level.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Pippen over Paul all day in my book.
Pippens are less common than Pauls. Pippen could do everything extremely well and was in the top 10 in more positive statistical categories than any other player in the league during the 90’s. Chuck Daly said he was the 2nd best player on the original Dream Team, that he coached. I’d venture to argue that Pippen probably helped Jordan better more than the other way around, as Pippen did all the little things that help everyone else. Not to mention, Pippen finished in the top 3 in mvp voting the one full year Jordan was playing baseball. Batum will never be Pippen, but the fact he even reminds us of him makes him the 2nd most valuable player on our team to me. Paul is great, but Pippen was a championship maker.
Good points, and I loved Pippen.
But it’s hard to compare the value of Pippen to CP3, until CP3 plays out his career. Pippen played 16-17 years and we can easily pick out the value of his contributions over that long time span. CP3 has played 5 years so we have to guess what he will be able to contribute and achieve over the remainder of his career, which depends a lot on who he gets to play with. Had Pippen never played with MJ, would he for sure be a future HOF?
I don’t agree with you that Batum is the 2nd most valuable player on the team. Don’t confuse potential with accomplishment. He’s played 25 minutes, scored 10 pts, and his much appreciated defense was more inconsistent that most people seem to realize. I think he’s going to be great. Will he become an all-star? I hope so, but it’s no sure thing. Roy, Miller, LMA were all more valuable, and Oden will be next year. Plus Camby was huge for us after he got here.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions
I said 2nd most valuable, not 2nd best player on the team last year.
We’re talking about value here so potential is extremely important. There’s a reason why everyone wants Batum and it mostly has to do with his potential. Players like Batum are both extremely rare and extremely valuable to winning championships. He can do everything well, including the little things, has extremely high bbiq, and is a lock down defender over 4 different positions. If his offense continues to improve, he will be an all-star without a doubt. Oden is the only player, other than Roy, that has a chance to be more valuable than Batum in the future, but his health concerns take away his value.
if you think that Nic alone would fetch CP3, then you've lost your mind
the Hornets are asking for Roy or LMA, and Batum, and probably more
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I never said that. I was responding to the idea that Portland wouldn't include Batum in a package.
But you knew that, didn’t you?
I also outlined a FANTASY trade yesterday that included Miller, Webster, Rudy, and Batum to get CP3.
But you knew that too. So why make that comment?
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions
because I said that it would take Roy and/or LMA to score CP3
but you already knew that, didn’t you?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I don't get it.
I responded to unemployedreflection post that Quick had said:
Batum was the only player other than Roy that approached "untouchable" status … that our unwillingness to let him go was preventing a number of potential trades.
To which I replied that
If that’s true, then KP has lost his mind in an effort to save his job…. Not trading Batum for CP3 is just plain crazy.
I have no idea what that has to do with you saying it would take Roy and/or LMA to get CP3, or why you took my comment about Batum out of context to take a shot at me. Did you misread something?
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm sorry guys
but this sounds like a pissing match. Hate to say it, because both of you normally make posts that I like to read, but you and two4larue need to move on from this.
Don't worry, we're BE friends, and I respect and enjoy 2fer's opinions.
We’ve both been around long enough to see everything that Blazers have ever done and enjoy looking back into the early days.
We just like to tweak each other now and again. I just didn’t get where this one was coming from. Maybe I missed something? No harm, no foul.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions
OK, let me connect the dots
First I said yesterday (only partly facetiously) that it would take Roy and LMA to land CP3
then you told me to take a walk (i.e. you’re crazy, it will never happen, etc)
Then you made your best effort to put a deal together that didn’t include either Roy or LMA, even though you knew it had a snowball’s chance of impressing NOLA.
Then we get word today that KP had (allegedly) put Batum and Oden into a proposal for CP3 and the Hornets said that that wasn’t rich enough
Then you responded to someone that KP not being willing to (hypothetically) trade Nic for CP3 was crazy
That’s when I turned the tables on you and responded
if you think that Nic alone would fetch CP3, then you’ve lost your mind the Hornets are asking for Roy or LMA, and Batum, and probably more
The point isn’t that I thought that you were saying that Nic was the linchpin in the CP3 deal, it was the idea that offering anything less than Roy and/or LMA was going to have any affect whatsoever on the Hornet’s decision. If KP had put Roy into the proposal, then there’s no reason to include Batum (unless you count him as the “other starter” that NOLA is demanding along with an all-star for CP3) The Blazers could have offered LMA and Batum, but then they would have come up short of NOLA’s requirement that an “all-star” be included in the deal (quasi all-stars like LMA need not apply, besides they already have David West)
From the beginning I was dubious of the Paul pursuit. Not that I think that KP wasn’t serious about it, but because he would never agree to include the one player that might actually make the Hornet’s flinch, and that’s #7. Personally, I’m glad that he didn’t, because I want to keep Roy and upgrade the PG position with Tony Parker (if it’s possible) without having to sacrifice Batum, Oden or LMA.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
OOOhhhhhh, you were upset because I told you to "take a walk or something" yesterday
when you suggested trading Roy and LMA to get CP3 (meaning get some fresh air and clear your head, not get off the site). Well, I am truly sorry if that offended you. I was only kidding. I thought we both had a similar sense of humor, e.g. comics (like Groucho), philosophers (like Yogi). Anyway, seriously, sorry for the “take a walk or something” remark yesterday.
FWIW, my fantasy trade (which I said had no chance of happening) for CP3 had nothing to do with your remark about Roy/LMA. I had already mentioned that idea of doing a 3 team trade in another thread the day before, but I wasn’t going to detail it out (for CP3) until the story broke yesterday about the Blazers pursuing him. But I understand how you connected that to your comment. So as I said just above, “Don’t worry, we’re BE friends, and I respect and enjoy 2fer’s opinions.” I hope you feel the same way.
(I would have put this in a private email to you if we had that on BE, but this way you get a public apology!)
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions
And I also said NO wouldn't make that Fantasy Trade.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions
interesting to hear, however, that LMA and Oden were more available than Batum.
I’d trade LMA before Batum, Camby and Cunningham can play PF, and (snark alert) it sounds like the Blazer scouts have already found LMA’s replacement in Craig Brackins
I don’t want to even have to consider trading Nic or Greg, not even for LBJ
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I can conceive of some situations I would trade LMA, but not that many.
LMA may be pretty soft, but with Oden, Camby, and hopefully Joel we can live with that.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Like I've been saying for a few months
I’d trade LMA for Parker, especially if I can extract Blair as well
I do not give Nic to the Spurs for Tony (not unless Batum’s shoulder has a cronic injury and they don’t know it, yet…turnabouts is fair play for their “bad heart” rumor re: Frenchy, 2 years ago!)
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
That's a tough one, but I don't think I do it.
I think it leaves us with too little offense up front. Too guard heavy on offense without LMA at PF. Blair isn’t as effective on a team that already features Oden and Przy (and Camby) to get most of the rebounds. I think we need LMA’s ability to get his shot and score.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I can live with guard-heavy scoring
if I have front-court heavy rebounding matched up with superior interior defense
Dunks and put-backs count as 2-point baskets, too. Stretch 4s aren’t absolutely necessary
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
So you value the rebounds and points that Blair won't get because we already have Oden, Przy, and Camby
more than the points that LMA will get playing with those guys? The fact that LMA gets midrange shots fits really well with Oden and Przy playing deep in the paint.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions
The fact that LMA gets midrange shots fits really well with Oden and Przy playing deep in the paint
I agree about LMA’s floor-spreading abilities, but you’ve got to give up something in order to get something, and I would sacrifice LMA if that’s what it took to complete a hypothetical Parker deal
Camby would then start at PF and spread the floor (great high-post passer)
Blair would be a valuable reserve banger, he scraps for rebounds near the floor that even Oden/Joel/Marcus won’t manage to secure
Cunningham would also receive more PT if LMA was gone, and Dante can help spread the floor, as well
LMA is not likely going anywhere, and I’m OK with that. But if you ask me which player I’d be more likely to part with if that was the only way to acquire Tony Parker, it’s an easy answer. I’d keep Batum and use a “committee” at the PF, then watch as the Blazers continue to draft PFs in years to come
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
on the radio again now
pretty much confirmed it was Paul:
target was multi-time all star, on the olympic team, and been in the news lately.
again confirmed it was 4 players, and that it would be "painful" to part with at least one of those guys. To me, that sounds like either Oden or Batum, maybe both. Didn’t sound like a big contract coming back (Peja/Okafor), as it was called “filler”. Maybe Posey at the most.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
so is the deal being held up on our end because we won't offer batum?
i kind of like that batum is that untouchable. maybe we’re overvaluing him, but i’d hate to see him become an all star on another team. now we just need to convince them to do a pryz, webster, miller, and rudy deal for paul and posey :)
"Nicolas! You're the strongest boy in the world!"
didn't sound like it
sounded more like NO pulled away. Whether or not Nic was included is still unclear. We were still negotiating, or wanting to, but NO backed off. Maybe it was all a ploy by them to set a baseline of value, maybe it was part of the ploy to hurry along their sale, maybe they realized “holy schmoly, we can’t trade Paul!” and changed their minds. We’ll never know I suppose.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
yeah, i still don't understand why they'd want to trade paul.
i think it makes much more sense for them to trade collison, instead. i’m still very into the rudy and a draft pick for collison idea.
"Nicolas! You're the strongest boy in the world!"
I'm betting ploy to encourage sale
with second nod to setting the market. I don’t they suddenly realize how stupid they are. Stupidity simply cannot recognize itself, regardless of time.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
This couldn
By that time, assuming he opts-in by July 1st. LMAs contract becomes his new contract, which means we’d be sending over 26.5M in contracts not including Batum. Which means we’d have to take on 11M additionally to CP3s ~15M contract.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
This couldn't happen until after July 1st.
Joel can’t be traded until he opts-in by July 1st. LMAs contract becomes his new contract, which means we’d be sending over 26.5M in contracts not including Batum. Which means we’d have to take on 11M additionally to CP3s ~15M contract. Which means Emeka’s contract 11.5M.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
something tells me LMA was not part of the deal
between the big contract, which cancel’s out the Hornets reason to even consider trading Paul, and the duplication with West, I find it hard to believe LaMarcus was one of the four players. Sounds to me like Either Joel or Miller for salary (I’ll say Miller, since he can play day one and trade can happen now), Rudy, and then either Martell (salary) and Batum (talent) or Oden (salary and talent) and maybe a Bayless. Either trade works salary wise for Paul and salary filler (Julian Wright perhaps)
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
Hmm.
Gotta sit on this for a minute but if it includes Joel, no trade can be made until after July 1st.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
exactly
which is one of the reasons why I think it was Miller instead.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
CP3 is BYC until July 1, so no deal was going to happen without a 3rd team until then anyway.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions
good point
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
Yep....I think it was Oden not LMA who was part of that package.
Oden makes way more sense for NO.
Trading LMA would have probably required a 3rd team.
He is BYC July 1 and NO is over the cap.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jun 22, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
i'd rather trade for collison and then attempt to get iggy, too.
"Nicolas! You're the strongest boy in the world!"
I think we should stand pat and keep KP. hopefully those two things can happen together
I think that KP is going on the offensive because draft day has always been the time when his star shines the brightest. Once the draft is done and FA signing period is done, his leverage with the Vulcan group diminishes until he’s canned on some quiet Friday afternoon when we Blazer fans are paying minimal attention.































