Meniscus Tears: Brandon Roy and Andrew Bynum
These playoffs have made me angry for a myriad of reasons, primarily the Blazers are out of the playoffs. This was the biggest downer, as it happened right as I entered finals (how can I be happy when my favorite sports team has "gone fishin'?). But that, my friends is besides the point.
Now, I may be missing something, ever since the Blazers lost, I largely stopped paying attention to the playoffs, since my team is gone. Furthermore, I hate LA, I dislike Boston unless they are playing LA, nor do i particularly care for the Magic. Normally I would dislike the Jazz, but they are playing LA. However, my disdain for them grows everyday knowing they can never beat LA in the playoffs, which just frustrates me, because we could.
All of this is besides the point. What I am writing this fanpost about, is the storied disproportionate media coverage I have witnessed, primarily surrounding the Meniscus debacles. When Roy tore his meniscus and stated he might still play since he could do "no further damage", every pundit, analyst, and person who purported themselves to be a NBA expert (I'm looking at you Barkley) derided his choice and the organization for letting it happen. WOE is portland for playing to win. "They are jeopardizing their future". "There is no way he can play and not injure his knee more, that whole organization is dysfunctional". "what a horrible move by Portland". These and quotes like them were commonplace as I TRIED to enjoy myself watching the PDX PHX series.
However, these statements made me think, maybe they're right. Regardless, now the same situation has emerged with a player on one of the media darlings. Andrew Bynum has a torn meniscus, and he has chosen to play through it. Perhaps it's because I haven't watched too many games since that fateful game 6 last week. Perhaps it's because I avoid the LAL UTH series, because it's been predetermined. Yet, I see no condemnation of the LAL decision to let Bynum play. This even after Bynum, a center as injury proned as any, had the tear in his meniscus that was worsened only a few days ago. Now it appears he's made out to be a hero, a champion. WHAT!!?!? Am I missing something here?
They said PDX was jeopardizing their future....isn't LA doing the same thing? Bynum is their best player under 30...(Gasol has 2 months, he hardly counts). How is this NOT jeopardizing THEIR future? Well, here i rest my case and my nerves. I hope no one else posted something like this; I hate to duplicate things, but blame finals for my lack of B-Edge reading consistency...Good day
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The big difference...
is that the F@kers are winning games.
Being insistent when you're wrong is just really, really annoying.
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on May 5, 2010 7:24 AM PDT reply actions
Big difference is......
the L*kers do no wrong in the eyes of the national media, and the refs for that matter.
by blazerbeliever97504 on May 5, 2010 8:08 AM PDT reply actions
roy>bynum
Michael Jordan is the Nicolas Batum of America
by thomasikehara on May 5, 2010 8:26 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
No, I'm pretty sure I've been on the right blog.
Sorry, some Blazer fans can still be honest. Roy wasn’t close to ready to start and it showed in game 6. Roy is a great player when healthy, but he ended up actually hurting us in those last 2 games.
I agree about the coverage of the story
Something else I heard this morning on a national radio show, the guys were talking about this issue, and for the first time that I can remember Bynum was compared to Bowie and Oden as being injury prone. They said the Laker should trade him as soon as they could this offseason because he will never stay healthy. They talked about his 3 straight seasons with leg problems, etc, etc, etc…
Ofcourse they also said he was the 2nd best American born center in the NBA after Howard, which I think is argueable, (B. Lopez was American born right?). Ofcourse my first thought was that Oden and Bynum are very similar players, both because of the injuries and because of their play. Looking at their stats, it seems to me that since they both have “injury concerns” we must throw that out the window, since either one we choose might not play that much in the future. Taking that away, Greg’s numbers for his first 2 years are way better than Bynum’s first 2, and Greg’s level of production in limited minutes this year, was better than Bynum’s “Breakout” year in 07-08, (that was the year he was “dominating” before he was injuried and played only 35 games). That was Bynum’s career best year for PER, 22.19, and this year was Greg’s, 23.14. Ofcourse that was Bynum’s third year playing in the NBA, and he came into the league at 18, right out of high school. This year was Greg’s 2nd year playing in the NBA he had 1 year of college and was 19. So I would say they were about the same as far as their development time goes.
The point is, Bynum gets a ton of love for being in LA, no way is he far and away the best American born center after Howard, I would say right now Lopez is, and Greg has just as much of a chance at that spot as Bynum does, it depends on who can stay healthy.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
The chastising by the national media really is compliment to Roy
They are saying Roy is much more valuable to the long-term prospects of the Blazer’s success than Bynum is to the Lakers’ success.
i don't know if that's it
Bynum is just the 3rd or 4th fiddle on that team – whereas Brandon is our best player, so what happens with Bynum isn’t quite as critical to LA as Brandon is to us
I was glad to read Ben’s post above, because I have been saying for a couple of years that Bynum is just as injury-prone as Oden, yet Oden gets all of the hate/dumping on. While I understand that Greg was the #1 pick and Bynum was a #10 pick so there’s a little difference in national media focus and expectations, but Bynum has been exactly the same in flashing great promise but not being able to stay on the court due to health.
My question – if the Blazers could swap Oden for Bynum straight up, right now, would we do it? Which center would you rather have?
Personally, I’d still prefer Oden
by rip_city_swagger on May 5, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Interesting Viewpoint....
…well as far as jeopardizing the future for The La*ers, I think The La*ers are today. I hate to admit it, but Kobe is an amazing player, but he’s getting older and has a lot of miles on him. Eventually, soon he will dip below the level that allows him to lead The La*ers to championship levels of viabilty. With all due respect, when that happens Bynum and Gasol just won’t be enough to keep LA hugging trophies. They are today, barring a major aquisition I don’t think they are tomorrow.
It’s an interesting viewpoint the difference in how the media is reacting to Bynums decision to play on a torn meniscus vs. Brandons decision to come back on surgerically repaired meniscus after only 8 days. But I think that’s the key. If Doctors are correct and playing on the torn meniscus doesn’t risk further injury then simply Bynum isn’t risking his future anymore than it is already at risk. I think what bothered pundits about Brandon is the fact that he was coming back from “surgery”. It might of been limited, and simple surgery….but he still had his knee opened and invaded and pieces removed. That is what I think made a lot of people nervous.
Personally, I don’t buy it 100% when Doctors say there is no risk. Seems to me, even if it’s only pain if you have a compromised knee, either with a torn meniscus or coming back from a surgery, you are still likely to conciously or subconciously react differently on the floor. This I think put’s you’re whole body at risk for injury. You are not going to cut the same, jump the same or have the same confidence…and that is dangerous.
So yes, I guess I’d say Bynum is risking his future and Brandon put his future at risk as well. But in the N.B.A. you can go from 100% healthy to 100% injured in a single moment. But to say there is “no risk” to either Bynum or Brandon I think is incorrect.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on May 5, 2010 10:10 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The media is basically saying:
You couldn’t get a title out of Bynum anyway, so sacrificing him for a title is easily worth it.
Roy, not worth sacrificing for a single title.
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by 



































