2009-10: A Season in Review
With the disappointment of playoff elimination safely behind us, let's take a look back at the ups and downs of the season just past.
The Blazers entered 2009-10 with high hopes. Coming off of their 4th-place finish in the West and triumphant return to the post-season wars the spring prior, with amazing bench depth and franchise center Greg Oden firmly in tow, Portland looked poised to challenge for the division crown and advance at least to the second round of the playoffs.
A small, dark cloud crept over Portland's silver lining almost immediately as small forward Nicolas Batum went down with a shoulder injury before the season even started. Into his place stepped one of the longest-tenured Blazers, Martell Webster. Webster had sat out the 2008-09 campaign with a foot injury. Together with the inexperienced Oden, Webster introduced a measure of uncertainty into Portland's starting lineup. It showed. The Blazers got off to a rocky start, unable to sustain offensive momentum against the quality teams the top of the season schedule threw in their path. Portland started 2-3. Oden's low post game, Brandon Roy's ball control, and LaMarcus Aldridge's need for touches didn't mesh. New acquisition Andre Miller's pedigree and performance became the center of burgeoning controversy as he languished in a bench role. Portland looked to be in disarray, perhaps a victim of its own depth and expectations. To make matters worse primary scoring sub Travis Outlaw joined Batum on the injured list with a season-killing foot injury duplicating Webster's of the year prior.
In the midst of all this something strange happened. Though the offense still tip-toed on pins and needles, particularly in the absence of Outlaw, Portland's defense broke down the door and shook down any opponent that got in the way. Though Greg Oden consistenly looked awkward in the post he became an enormous backstop and rebounding gravity well on the other end. All of a sudden the Blazers were holding opponents in the 70's and 80's...numbers which even their offense could best. Combined with a more modest roster of foes their defensive acumen spurred the Blazers to 6 straight wins and an 8-3 mark. Portland came back to earth in the following weeks but still managed to play .500 ball, carrying a 12-8 record into their December 5th date with Houston.
That's when the air came out of the ball.
No Blazer fan could forget the sight of Greg Oden being wheeled out of the Rose Garden on a stretcher after an attempted block of an Aaron Brooks shot in the first quarter of that game. This was also the first game of a long absence for reserve guard Rudy Fernandez who suffered from a back injury. Suddenly the deep and talented Blazers were scrambling to fill positions and minutes. And it would only get worse.
Before the worse happened, Portland managed to claw its way to some better. They continued their .500 ways through mid-December before running off 6 wins in 7 games straddling the new year. But sweet without bitter was not part of the Portland palate in this campaign. The first win in that streak, a December 22nd game versus the Mavericks, saw reserve center Joel Pryzbilla collapse in a fetal position eerily similar to the one Oden had assumed 15 days prior. Having ripped a knee tendon, Pryzbilla would be lost for the season. Now the Blazers were making do with the likes of plucky second-rounders Jeff Pendergraph and Dante Cunningham plus the ancient Juwan Howard, brought in originally as the proverbial locker-room influence but now pressed into two recent seasons' worth of playing time.
Somehow, some way, the wins just kept on coming. The Blazers dropped games to the Clippers and Grizzlies but picked up wins against the L*kers, Bucks, and Magic. They'd win 2 of 3 then lose 3 of 4 then win a couple more. In one of the unkindest cuts of all All-Star Brandon Roy also succumbed to injury, nursing a hamstring and missing 14 of 15 games between January 15th and February 10th. Forget short-handed, the Blazers were no-handed.
Through it all Portland continued to grind out games and often wins. Rudy Fernandez returned for spot duty and eventually full availability. Nicolas Batum followed a couple weeks later. Jerryd Bayless provided surprising scoring punch. Andre Miller and LaMarcus Aldridge held down the fort. The team caught as caught could otherwise. When Roy departed the Blazers had a 24-16 record, 8 games above .500. When he returned a month later they were 30-24, still 6 games above .500.
Finally looking like they could trend upwards the Blazers made a decisive move to cement their prospects, trading just-healed Travis Outlaw and intermediate point guard Steve Blake (both carrying expiring contracts) to the Los Angeles Clippers for center Marcus Camby. Camby mended a near-complete rip in the interior defensive net, freeing LaMarcus Aldridge to play his own game instead of worrying about the center role in addition. Portland would go on to win 7 of their next 10, improbably looking like they could still challenge for that division lead and its guaranteed sweet playoff seed.
Notions of that were brought to a halt in a critical game against Denver on March 7th, a game wherein Jerryd Bayless showed Portland's promise by scoring 24 but the Nuggets showed Portland's current reality by scoring 118 and handing the Blazers a decisive loss. Undeterred, the Blazers would bounce back to win 9 of their next 10, losing only to the Phoenix Suns until they were again thumped by the Nuggets, this time by 17 in the Rose Garden on April 1st.
By this time it was clear that--miraculous resolve, steady recoveries, and timely moves aside--the Blazers were not going to get anywhere near the upper playoff seed they dreamed of no matter what the tight Western Conference standings said. They were embroiled in a close-quarters duel for the lower seeds, however...one that mirrored their 2008-09 battle for the 2nd through 5th spots. In order to get the most favorable position possible Portland had to win. And they did. The Blazers came out ahead in 4 of 5 contests, including a pivotal win over the rival Thunder, before resting their main players in a meaningless final loss to Golden State to end the season. The reward for persevering through the turmoil and tragedy was another 50-win season notched and a three-way tie with Oklahoma City and San Antonio which left the Blazers in the 6th seed facing Phoenix. But 2009-10 regular season was not about to leave without one last parting kiss. Brandon Roy tore his meniscus in the 80th game of the year. He would miss at least the opening of the playoffs and likely the whole thing.
Though the Blazers had gotten the upper hand over the Suns 2-1 in the regular season Roy's injury and Phoenix's immense offensive prowess cast a pall over the proceedings. Portland immediately ripped aside that shroud by taking Game 1 of the series in Phoenix, holding back the Suns' attack with transition hustle, physicality, and some opportune scoring from Andre Miller who by now had emerged as a legitimate pillar of the team. Then the Suns started defending Miller with players larger than Steve Nash, eliminating his size and strength advantage. With Miller in chains Phoenix was free to make life rough for LaMarcus Aldridge, who could never get his jumper going and scored only sporadically elsewhere. Suddenly the Blazers were forced to rely on role-players Fernandez, Batum, Webster, and Bayless for playoff-level, big-point, big-minute production. Offense sputtering, Portland collapsed entirely for two straight games, losing homecourt advantage back to the Suns as quickly as they had earned it.
Brandon Roy limped off of the Portland bench to provide an inspirational lift in Game 4 of the series, a game in which Aldridge also rediscovered his shooting touch. For a bright, shining moment the Blazers were again able to do what they wanted: contain Phoenix, limit transition points, force turnovers, hit shots. The key area missing from Portland's equation was rebounding, a category in which the Blazers failed to find a rhythm throughout the series. Aldridge's jumper again went on leave in Game 5. Brandon Roy's emotional lift evaporated under the reality of no explosive lift or lateral cutting ability. Without rebounding dominance to fall back on the Blazers once again wilted before the Suns' attack. Portland had a chance to send the series to the ultimate finish but came up short in Game 6 under Phoenix's spread offense and lack of production from its stars. Portland's bench players finally came through on their pre-season promise in this final game but it was far too little, far too late. For a second straight year the Blazers exited the first round in 6 games.
Portland did not achieve either of its clearest objectives in this campaign: winning the division and advancing in the playoffs. In that sense the season was disappointing. But only the most miserly churl could hold those expectations in the face of the torrent of mishaps that befell the team during the year. Experiencing more injuries than any team in the league not named Golden State the Blazers still won 50 and made the playoffs. Like the Whos down in Whoville they did it without boxes or ribbons or bows, they did without centers or posting down low. They won without All-Stars and Spaniards and Frenchmen. They won with old geezers and sub-par defense-men. They won playing rookies from deep off the benches. They won with their grit and their guts in the trenches. And some who observed them have been known to say that their hearts grew three sizes (at least!) on the way. One hopes with their poise and their passion now proven that once they are healthy their game will be groovin'. And thus though this season we all shed a tear we turn our bright faces to welcome next year. In two-oh-eleven with pride we might burst. It has to get better...it couldn't get worse.
And that, as they say, is that. Next up: Recapping the individual players.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
60 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes
Greg Oden busted his kneecap trying to defend the commander of Deep Space 9. A ferengi with a personal cloaking device snuck in with a sonic hammer when he jumped and busted him all up. True story.
Fixed anyway, because we weren’t supposed to tell.
—Dave
damn ferengi
Oden/Pritchard/Allen should remember rule 236: You can’t buy fate.
Geriatric Dunk Squad!
3/7/10 - Andre Miller Tomahawk jams on the Denver Nuggets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-JVgm7F1QA
1/4/10 - Juwan Howard dunks on Chris Kaman.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTkOqDgLb6s
4/12/10 - Marcus Camby drops 30 and 13 on OKC to cement 50 wins.
http://www.nba.com/blazers/media/camby_chant_041310.mp3
by Eat Politicians on May 3, 2010 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions
The Vulcans won't be amused that the story is finally out
Especially now that the Dominion is also coming after them through the wormhole from the Oklahoma quadrant to the NW Division.
Vulcans are never amused
or at least they go through great efforts to hide their amusement.
Now about the Vulcan Corp., ….. unfortunately it’s more mysterious to me than the Vulcan species.
by Cepstrum on May 3, 2010 11:57 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Joel injured his knee in the Mavs game
"If we win a title, I promise not to hate on anyone associated with the Blazers for 1 full season" - jksnake99
We will meet them with our fury and we will crush them like vermin.
ARRRGH
Evidently I need to stop doing these after midnight when hopped up on experimental flavors of Mountain Dew.
—Dave
That Mountain Dew will getchya!
"If we win a title, I promise not to hate on anyone associated with the Blazers for 1 full season" - jksnake99
We will meet them with our fury and we will crush them like vermin.
What a season
Here’s to next year. Get healthy, Oden. We need ya.
Mortimer
#52
by Mortimer on May 3, 2010 2:03 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
ditto
Geriatric Dunk Squad!
3/7/10 - Andre Miller Tomahawk jams on the Denver Nuggets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-JVgm7F1QA
1/4/10 - Juwan Howard dunks on Chris Kaman.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTkOqDgLb6s
4/12/10 - Marcus Camby drops 30 and 13 on OKC to cement 50 wins.
http://www.nba.com/blazers/media/camby_chant_041310.mp3
by Eat Politicians on May 3, 2010 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
seventh!
Can’t wait till next year! Oh yeah!
by 1ofthe7 on May 3, 2010 2:04 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
A year ago, if someone asked me who would play the most minutes for us at center in the 4th quarter of an elimination game in the playoffs
There is a 97% chance I would have said “Oh, Juwan Howard, of course”, but I think most of you wouldn’t have guessed it. So, I can say CALLED IT for this season.
Mortimer
#52
It's always SOMEBODY'S fault.
That’s a given on BE.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
I am man enough to aborb the blame for this season, Timg56
I accept the blame, CatMan2, and promise not to do it again.
BUT THIS WAS A WARNING FROM ME TO ALL OF YOU TO BEHAVE. If you guys act up again, I’ll make sure we have another season like this one.
Love,
Mortimer
#52
Your manliness has never been in question for me ....
… except perhaps when your wife is around.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Dave, I look forward to individual recap
I hope this includes a critique of Nate’s performance. It would only be fair.
One can tell from you choice of phrasing ...
… that fairness is the last thing one can expect from you with regard to nate’s performance.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Yeah, right!
I started the season a huge Nate fan. Then I saw his gross mismanagement of Miller and his lack of offensive flexibility once Roy was not 100%. Nate has been far less than what I had hopped for. Does that sound so unfair?
by thebigoutdoors on May 4, 2010 6:03 AM PDT up reply actions
overall it was a sucessful season
but i feel we were robbed of what could have been by all the injuries. maybe next year…
I get the paper, so I don't care!
Oh come on
Can you PROVE having a healthy Oden or Roy would even help us?
You stat-heads are all the same…
Morty Pie
#52
-1 x mortimer = remitrom
When he wakes up in bed tomorrow I'll be right there next to him saying "Brandon I like you just the way you are". - Mike Rice
by pxilpooshr on May 3, 2010 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Can it be proven?
Of course not. I also cannot prove that if we had a time machine, and could have brought in a healthy, young Bill Walton, Buck Williams and Clyde Drexler, the Blazers would have done better. However, I think that we could reasonably surmise that if the Blazers had the technology to overcome the laws of physics, they would still be playing.
So yes, if Roy had been able to play to the best of his capabilities, the series would have been different. Phoenix would have had to account for 3 scorers, instead of two. If Oden had been available, the Blazers would have had a rebounder and post presence on defense. Plus, Phoenix would have no one who could guard him.
You don’t need stats to know that with different and healthy personnel, the team’s performance would have been difficult.
Of course, if the Suns had had the same time-warp machine and brought back Charles Barkley….
I dunno man! I dunno!
I’m just not buying it, I just don’t see how a healthy Oden or a healthy Roy helps us, just doesn’t add up!
(I was just funnin’, the biggest bummer of the season was that the West is so wide open right now and our two best players weren’t healthy for the playoffs. HUGEly annoying).
Morty
#52
Yeah, I forgot Outlaw was out injured and that Martel sat out all last season too!
I’m 65% pleased with the season.
amazing season (if you ask me)
(which you didn’t). I felt Miller’s 52 points against Dallas was a remarkable and noteworthy event in the season. It seemed to do so much for the team and the fans in keeping their hopes up. I was particularly jacked up after that game.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil, and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well. - Missy Dizick
Good summary, Dave!
Looking forward to your thoughts about where the team is going now, what moves you’d expect over the summer, etc.
#52
Dave, nice summary but.....
I can’t get excited about next year until some things about this team change. I don’t think simply having everyone healthy will do enough to get us out of the first round. In the end, isn’t that what the real measuring stick is-advancing in the playoffs to the point where we win the championship?
If Oden comes back in shape, motivated, and says healthy all year, our defense will improve a lot. Same if Batum can manage to avoid getting injured again playing in Europe this summer and IF Nate decides to take advantage of Batum’s skills (and play him a lot more for cripes sakes).
The problem is, I just don’t know what to think of this team’s talent. Is it good enough with all of its players healthy to do some damage in the playoffs? I don’t think we’ll ever know until the offensive philosophy and execution change. That doesn’t necessarily mean a new coach, but it does mean adding someone to the coaching staff who knows how to best utilize talent in a new offense. It that happens and we still don’t see a less predictable and stagnant offense, then we don’t have the right players on this team. I fear the worse scenario- we don’t have the right coaching philosophy or the right players. Hopefully, that’s not the case, but we’ll never know until the team changes how it plays on offense.
Defining success:
If you define success only by wins and losses, in general, and playoff wins, in particular, this season was a disappointment. However, if you define success as an engaging and entertaining “fan experience,” this season was a roaring success. I have watched all 40 seasons, and this was clearly one of the best. As fans we experienced the full spectrum of human emotion, and after all the balls are put away for summer our love for “our” team has only deepened.
The greatest disappointment for me was not GO’s knee; injuries are simply part of the game. My greatest disappointment is the controversy surrounding KP. As anyone who has followed the team for decades knows, the team on floor is a reflection of person making the personnel decisions. I love the character, hustle, and skill of the players KP has brought to our damp city. I think he has been nearly lights out as an evaluator of talent. He has shown aggressiveness in making deals to acquire talent and patience in allowing that talent time to develop. Not every move has been a “home run,” but most have been solid and quite a few have been truly inspired.
By almost any rational measure, KP has to be considered an outstanding GM, among the best in the league. If the Vulcans and Paul Allen make good on their threats to fire him, they will be endangering the future of the team. Paul Allen spent hundreds of millions of dollars repairing the Blazer “brand” and restoring the team’s connection to the community. KP has been the most public face of those efforts. Allen will not only endanger the team’s future on the floor, he will damage his own legacy and cement his reputation as an erratic and irrational business owner. Please, don’t do it Mr Allen.
The team is close to the community and close to be able to compete for a Championship. It will take one or two tweaks to the roster and a bit of luck with injuries, but we are close. I have real concerns about Nate, but it is difficult to argue with the records he has achieved. I won’t shed a tear if he goes, but I think he probably deserves one more year to see how far he can take the team. I hope the organization convinces Nate to bring in a top Assistant to help him rework the offense. We need to integrate more low post scoring and more motion and ball movement into our offense.
All in all, there are a lot of reasons for optimism and only a few reasons for trepidation. The future is bright, the injury clouds will part, and the team is poised to challenge the league elite next season.
by upper left corner on May 3, 2010 9:21 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
good thoughts
although I am quite a bit more pessimistic than you…The KP stuff is spot on…Allen has not been a wise businessman and Vulcan is his “re-gain the green avenue” (tough, bottom line people with little compassion for the community…unless they are willing to pay)
I have watched the Blazers from day one also, and I must say I ‘ve seen at least two more entertaining and also more successful teams…The Walton era(although short) and the Drexler years….but I enjoyed their style of play a lot more than Nate’s half court system…I can’t enjoy this edition of the team as much, because the slow, mundane, predictable offense is boring (to me)…. give me the old Bingo Bango Bongo (fun to watch) i have to give up that thought with this team,( as is)…..Because, I guess, it’s still Roy’s team…and also what Nate thinks is best….add Oden and your slower still
(IMO) quite possibly our dead end…However, it’s what we have and it looks like we will live or die by it….Do we live longer or die quickly? hope if we live longer, it’s not at the bottom end of the playoffs .
Funny, the last playoff game could have answered some questions. Instead it solidified some old doubts…no question Phoenix was the better team…but Nate was outcoached by someone who, supposedly, was less qualified…So my thoughts would have been; yes, Phoenix is better, but we should have won the home game with the fans and Nate being the x-factor…..So this last game gave me a pretty good idea of where we are at going into next season….We are not yet ready for prime time…….
Tough to evaluate the team when our two top players are out, and hobbled, respectively!
How can you read anything into the Phoenix series other than that Nate makes limited and uninspired adjustments and has strange rotations? Oden was on the bench and Roy was a shadow of his usually efficient self.
Imagine the L@kers with Gasol out and Kobe ten days off knee surgery.
People seem to forget that Oden in spite of being both raw and rusty racked up a PER of 23. That is truly an astonishing stat and bodes well for future dominance if he can come back healthy and regain his enthusiasm for the game.
I agree that the Ramsay and Adelman teams were a lot more fun to watch, but I am growing to love this cohort of players as much as I loved those earlier groups. Nate is frustrating to watch. He is a real grinder who found success with hard work and determination. He is great at fucus, good at motivation, OK at defense, and limited on offense. His handling of the Blake/Miller controversy was almost criminal, IMO. Having said all that, he has achieved a lot of progress. As I said in my OP, I would be happy if he moved on, but doubt that it will happen.
by upper left corner on May 3, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I confess
it has never been about the Phoenix series or any one game, for that matter….my read is never singular or comes from stats or what could be, it’s all about history, simple observation, and comparison of players and styles of play…..
The issue may be qualification, but history supports the end result…..and no matter what excuses this team may or may not have, history supports the truth more than singular stats will ever do. Take in all the probable parts and you have a reasonable doubt about this teams chances…I’m talking about getting to the next level and beyond (if desired)
What good did that PER for Oden do for the team this year? He’s been “on potential” every since he came into the league…..and if he comes back and plays healthy and does good things….He’s still really never been tested ‘under fire" …..By this I mean he’s still a curiosity in this league….If he proves he can do someting, then the good teams will counter….Show me what Nate has done for counter measures, when they stop your core players or take you out of what you want to do?…..Not to say having 3 options on offense could be all we need, but the jury is clearly out until delivery is made. Thinking any other way, stands on optimism alone or the faith that this team, when healthy could have beaten Phoenix or any other team in the first round.
No argument about satisfaction, but what you measure that with(or against ) is the barometer to which you use to get better…I think you gain much more by addressing your weaknessess than by refining your strengths, The good teams will take advantage of your weaknessess and take you away from your strengths. Counter measures win in the playoffs. Getting stops more crucial than scoring….and, of course, you have to have good players that can function together as a cohesive unit.
I’m saying, that if we do have all the parts, then they need to come together and prove it.
KP burned some bridges...
has to be. If you add up his accomplishments and take away the (perceived) failings, he still comes out as a fine GM. I can’t see why they would change GM’s in the middle of building this team unless there was something personal involved. KP’s demeanor at the press conference really said it all, to me anyway. The Blazers may roll on just fine with a new GM, but I’m not looking forward to KP going to another team.
Keep KP!
by hellsfrozenover on May 3, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Hey Kuhnsmith , you beat me to it..I have similiar thoughts
They won with their grit and their guts in the trenches. And some who observed them have been known to say that their hearts grew three sizes (at least!) on the way. One hopes with their poise and their passion now proven that once they are healthy their game will be groovin’.
Take away Miller, Camby and Howard and show me some grit….If the team grew at all, it was because of them…
You can give the whole team credit for not folding and thus salvaging the season…after that there are too many questions centering around consistency and toughness… We’ve added some men to our group of boys. It should help this team mature. The team’s leadership has switched to these old veterans. The core group,( including Nate) have never risen to that sustainable level that can qualify trust….In other words, what was a given before, is now shadowed with some doubt….
No one will argue that this team has progressed to a new level from 4 years ago
but the next level is the hardest to reach. Teams can sit in our position for decades and still never get good enough to contend in the later playoff rounds, Technically this season we held serve, now the question is…….Are we good enough to get to the next level and also what is the next level….?
This is where you get rid of "hope’ and build a foundation that supports a winning atmosphere….this is much more complex than puting the ball in the hoop or reviewing statistics….Champiohship teams evolve, they are not born and then hoped for….
WyEast
One thing I love about Portland and Blazer fans in general is our eternal optimism-and really-our relative lack of cut throat-ness (is that a word!) . I don’t really want this to change. However, given that the Blazers are the only game in town combined with the innate gentility of the populace, there’s a lot of “magical thinking” surrounding this team.
A good, entertaining team is fun to watch. I really enjoyed watching the Blazers try their hardest this year to overcome adversity. It was a very nice story. However, as another one who’s followed and lived and died for the Blazers since 1970, I can also say that watching a team get into the playoffs and lose year after year in the first round gets old after a while. I had season tickets for 12 years-from 1977-89 and I don’t know if we ever got out of the first round during that period. Very frustrating.
I hope Paul Allen makes his decisions about KP and Nate and makes them soon for everyone’s sake.
Man, I sure wish we had another major league team (no, not soccer) to focus on for a while!
Yes
I love Baseball and Hockey…never played hockey, but my son did….Lived in the country, so getting my son to an ice rink was a chore(sometimes daily)….IMO hockey is the best sport to view live…I think most will put baseball on the boring list….i played some organized ball, and fell in love with it….watch the Mariners, but have no loyalties (they have pitching, but can’t hit and no power to speak of)
Basketball has been the focus, quite naturally, because of the Blazer franchise . It’s also the sport that I played the most and was involved in for 20 of my younger years. I sometimes get too critical because I have an ‘entrenched" thought process about how the game should be played….There are lots of ways to get from point A to B and, of course, we are just the armchair second guessers that have no consequences for our comments or ideas….
I am old enough to have viewed some games from the Blazers first season. This was from the second row (right behind the bench)…Bought my general admission tickets for $3.50(student discount) and after 5 min of the first quarter, sat in the second row..One time I actually sat at the end of the bench ( back then they only had one assistant and a traineri no longer live in Portland, but have followed them and have went to several games (never a season ticket holder)….have’nt been to a game in 7 years..But did see 2 games live in the Championship year playoffs….
I am biased towards a running game, so find this edition of the team my 3rd favorite… and I usually have to let go and let the next generation have thier team…..
correction
Blazers fought with Denver on April 1st. but that game was held in Pepsi Center
anyway.. I’m always inspired by your article, Dave.. thank you :)
Last year was like a magic carpet ride
It was like visiting an old friend after years away, it was all fun.
This year was, in the end, inspiring because whatever the odds against this team, they just didn’t quit. I’ve said this a lot but as as a fan all you can ever ask of your team is that they give you everything they had and this team did.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
I just have to start rollin' with a .sig now.
Judging from some other folks around here, I don’t think it will be too big…
Like the Whos down in Whoville they did it without boxes or ribbons or bows, they did without centers or posting down low. They won without All-Stars and Spaniards and Frenchmen. They won with old geezers and sub-par defense-men. They won playing rookies from deep off the benches. They won with their grit and their guts in the trenches. And some who observed them have been known to say that their hearts grew three sizes (at least!) on the way. One hopes with their poise and their passion now proven that once they are healthy their game will be groovin'.
That is kind of pushing it though, especially for 1-line followups.
Like the Whos down in Whoville they did it without boxes or ribbons or bows, they did without centers or posting down low. They won without All-Stars and Spaniards and Frenchmen. They won with old geezers and sub-par defense-men. They won playing rookies from deep off the benches. They won with their grit and their guts in the trenches. And some who observed them have been known to say that their hearts grew three sizes (at least!) on the way. One hopes with their poise and their passion now proven that once they are healthy their game will be groovin'.
by conspirator5 on May 3, 2010 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Coincidentally the birthplace of Dr. Seuss and the Basketball Hall of Fame are in the same city: Springfield Mass
The city in which James Naismith invented basketball

Hurt by our early success
The 2008-2009 team got such a good result that winning became the goal rather than a more rational personnel development process. LeBron James is in his seventh year and maybe he’ll win a championship. LeBron is such a talent that the team put mostly veterans on the starting group and even some of the bench. Even then it’s take SEVEN years!
I think winning 54 games last season hurt because the blazer’s started to believe they can win now. But I think Oden, Aldridge, Roy, Webster, Bayless, Rudy, Mills, Dante still need to learn more game before we can have any lasting achievement. That means, and I said this at the beginning of the season, that the team may have to settle for the lower tier of the playoff pool while it’s developing the game of the young personnel on the Blazer’s. When the team has reached the point where experience has reached the level of a championship run the player’s will probably know it first.
Question for Mr. Dave (et al.)
Great analysis, as usual. What I’d like to know, however, is your rating of this season’s entertainment value to you, the fan.
After all, the point of sports is to provide us with entertainment and take up our time, distracting us from the mundane/unpleasant parts of life. As with the past few seasons, I’d rate this season very high in that regard. The Blazers used up a lot of my time and thought energy. Yes, the outcome+injuries+"sad" play were unfortunate and undesirable, but as far as entertainment, the 2009—2010 Blazers delivered for me.
Don’t get me wrong. Winning is important and relevant: I find it very hard to interest myself in the Mariners anymore now that’s been assured for the past several seasons that they have no shot whatsoever.
So how would you grade this season wrt this criterion?
by Cepstrum on May 3, 2010 12:05 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
This season is not a success - injuries aside
For me, you have to come back to playoff results. Judging by the playoffs, we were not successful. And I’m not even talking wins and losses here. Last year we lost 4-2 to Houston, but I thought we were pretty successful in those 6 games. We got understandably blitzed in game 1, held home court the rest of the series, and all three games in Houston were decided by very narrow margins. There was hope that between the bad matchup problems and experience, we could learn some lessons to apply toward 2009-10.
Fast forward 12 months. Yes, there were injuries, yes we were hobbled. But we did have a matchup that was the most favorable for us of all possible options, and we had that previous experience to draw from. If we lost to Phoenix in 6 games but had a good game plan, made good adjustments, executed as well as could be hoped, played hard, and went down swinging, I would have been able to say unequivocally that this season was a great success given the circumstances.
Sadly, that was not the case. We seem to have learned nothing from our experience against Houston, and tried to win games using the same easy-to-defend isolation sets and one on one play. When our plays were adjusted to and defended, we had no backup plan, nor did we even appear to try and devise one as the series went on. We just kept banging our head against the same wall. No attempts were made to exploit Nash on defense after game 1. When our defense was exploited time and time again by the Suns quick weak side passing and dead eye shooting, we never changed our scheme. When Howard got abused repeatedly due to his poor lateral quickness we continued to put him in the same situation again and again. When our bigs continued to get switched onto Nash, we did nothing to try and prevent or limit it. What’s worse, in 3 of the 6 games we appeared to lack any drive, hustle, or effort. That is failure, plain and simple. Losing is one thing, not being ready to play is quite another.
Sadly, this was a year wasted. It didn’t have to be – even with the injuries. First, we waste the first 20 games meandering around through lineup changes galore because we are too afraid to hurt anyone’s feelings. We can’t figure out how to integrate a dominating big man into our offense without alienating our all star wing. We can’t figure out how to use a pass-first point guard to help get good shots for everyone else on the roster. Then the injuries hit, and we play musical chairs the rest of the year. All the while, we still haven’t learned the most vital lessons of all: A) how to avoid switching on every other pick that comes our way, and B) isolation offense may look good in the hustle and bustle of the 82 game season, but is far too easy to take away when teams have a full series to plan for you.
My fear is we are sitting here 12 months from now talking about how we just got picked apart by (playoff team X) because we can’t seem to figure out how to defend a basic pick without switching and creating mismatches, B) we have no desire to even attempt to exploit mismatches of our own, because we must stick to Plan A no matter what!, and C) we played a whole series of "stand around and watch (Andre/Roy/LMA/Oden) go 1 on 1 (or 3) to get a contested shot becase D) we still haven’t figured out the best way to exploit a defense is the same way teams tear us apart – moving bodies and moving the ball.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
by douglast on May 3, 2010 12:41 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Coaching seems to be an issue
I think the players did everything that was asked of them, they just weren’t allowed to have any alternatives.
Of course, in our world, management can never be wrong, so blame the players for poor execution.
Your thoughts mirror mine exactly
I’ve posted a couple of times since the season ended about our coaching issues. All of the missteps you wrote about are all coaching induced.
Unfortunately, I think next year will be more of the same. Nate’s going to get a pass because of all the injuries this year. There are those that will say Nate got us to 50 wins in spite of all the injuries. I say we got 50 wins in spite of Nate as the head coach.
I hope Paul Allen’s as frustrated as I am about the game planning. That’s the only way we’ll see a change. But I’m resigned to the fact that there will be at least one more season of frustration on this front for me…
not to mention
we fail to develop young players because we have already pigeon-holed them into a specific role and we are unwilling to allow them to expand their game in actual game-time play. Fear of failure (turnovers) rules all. Every possession for 82 games is absolutely critical and we cannot afford to spend even one finding out if player X can do Y. Look at all these guys on other teams who’ve been allowed to play themselves into confidence and success – Any chance they would have been giving that latitude her under Nate? It seems unlikely.
Nic – you are a defender and outlet shooter. I know you might be able to someday do more, but we aren’t going to allow you the opportunity to do so. You will never get a play called for you, even given an obvious mismatch. Now, go show us all your offensive skills this summer, so we can talk about all the potential you have, then bring you back in the fall, play you 25 minutes, and never give you the ball.
Rudy – We love your creative passing, but only when it works. Turn the ball over, and it’s pine time for you. Keep shooting – as long as you don’t miss that is. Hey, why are you looking over your shoulder and lacking confidence?
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
I agree with this completely
Watching good teams play high IQ ball in the playoffs is a real eye-opener.
by Jeffe Portland on May 4, 2010 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Douglast....
Loved your last couple of posts! I think you are spot on-unfortuNATEly (sorry).
Wrong
until they were again thumped by the Nuggets, this time by 17 in the Rose Garden on April 1st.
the blazers played the nuggets at home twice, the first was on the second game of the season when oden missed two FTs, then the next time on Christmas
Michael Jordan is the Nicolas Batum of America

by 



















