Brace yourself for this one... and remember the refs did not make the blazers play as crappy as they did last night (I don't blame them). However, this was Camby's 4th foul in the 3rd and had to be pulled right after... and we all know what happened from there.
The amazing Marcus Camby has the ability to foul without even being near Steve Nash.
I HAD to look at this again and it was worse than what I remember. This is definitely the worst foul called all year... because there literally was none. You can see Camby, Roy and Hill all confused on what was called.
Initially going to Roy, then changed to Camby... then Joey Crawford decides he fouled Nash and does some neck hand gesture.
HD is still be processed, so give it a minute.
EDIT info on some of the publicity:
http://goo.gl/agNT - Made youtube front page!
http://goo.gl/5FTp - Made DIGGs frontpage but needs more diggs to keep consistant (1000 diggs so far)!
http://goo.gl/Sm8a - Bill Simmons tweet of the video
http://goo.gl/2nkp - Made Reddits top of sports section
about 2 years ago
brandonmitchell
80 comments
14 recs |
Comments
That was some Grade A USDA Prime Choice
BS!
I hope the league reviews that “foul” and reprimands Crawford somehow. Nothing has gone our way this year. So is the life of a Blazer.
Destroy the Suns in 7!!!
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on Apr 27, 2010 6:07 AM PDT reply actions
Officially, there is no recourse (contractually) for the NBA to punish refs under any circumstances, other than firing...
It’s one of the reasons no one is allowed to talk about refs… what is the NBA supposed to do? They can’t fine refs for things.
by JordanLeDoux on Apr 27, 2010 6:26 AM PDT up reply actions
they can suspend refs...
they have done it before.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
blah it the post too soon.
Crawford was suspended after his fight with Duncan a few years back if you remember. They can remove him from the ref playoff pool, and not allow him to ref any more playoff games, which would be like a fine, since he would not earn the extra money for those games.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
At least Nate doesn't do the
2 year old stomping, folding arms, temper tantrums that Gentry does. That guy is a complete embarrassment. I think he even complains when the calls do go his way.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
Gentry pisses me off.
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on Apr 27, 2010 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions
He does complain about things even when a call goes his way.
"She turned me into a newt!
A newt?
...I got better."
What an embarrassment (If I were a Pho fan)
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Apr 27, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow - either the video above is a major conspiracy OR
there are some really blind mice.
Unbelievable.
I saw this and thought:
Wow, when did Oden get back onto the floor? That there is his type of foul.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Apr 27, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I was watching the TNT feed
and was so confused about this call, they didn’t replay it or even mention it. Thanks for posting.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
TNT has a contract with the NBA not to 'examine' or 'explain' official decisions
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Camby did have his hands a little high
But It was no foul, Hill holds his hands up initially thinking the call is on him.
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on Apr 27, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions
because if i was anything it was a moving screen on Hill
but it wasn’t even that, the contact was so incidental.
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
exactly
It was a no call. If they felt like they had to make a call, it would clearly have to be a moving screen on Hill. First he pushes Roy out of the way, then he steps sideways into camby, it was two moving screens in one play. Unbelievable.
Where's Rudolfo?
Geez
at some point you just have to wonder if Stern and crew are actually reviewing refs, and if so should that information be made more public (transparent officiating as Henry Abbott refers to). I would really, really like to get a response from the NBA on this one. But no, they will just sweep it under the rug. It didn’t lose us the game, but crap like this sure doesn’t help.
Brandon Roy, 'nuff said.
I think it may well have cost us this game
We can all pretend that the officiating in this game did not matter. Sure the team should not have collapsed with Camby out. But look at the video and look at the numbers through 3 qtrs of this game:
Camby out (2nd foul) 23-11 4:55 1st
Camby back 34-34 9:21 in second
Camby leaves 47-52 0:52 in second
Camby back 47-57 start of 3rd
Camby Out (4th foul) 58-65 5:20 3rd
Camby back in start of 4th 66-84
In other words, with Camby in, Portland was up 10 (47 – 37)points in the first 3 qtrs (and portland had just cut a 14 point lead to 7 when the 4th call was made), while, with Camby on the bench Portland was down 29 (19-47).
Joey Crawford should face severe consequences for his incompetence.
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
by PDXBuckeye on Apr 27, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec
Good recap. This is at least half of the reason we lost. This isn’t L*kers-Kings game 6 bad, but it’s worth the Blazer organization making a stink over.
Despite what the NBA and Stern want you to believe, officials have emotions and agenda’s just like every other human being on the planet. When they let it interfere with fair competition and there are no repercussions, it just makes the whole association look bad.
Mess with the game, it'll mess with you.
its not like grant hill is a lousy free throw shooter
0-1 point swing
Michael Jordan is the Nicolas Batum of America
2 down, 14 to go
if anything that foul
was on Amare. But your point still stands.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
It's not even about the free throw
It’s about putting Camby on the bench with 4 fouls, in a 7 pt game. There was absolutely no foul on anyone. Crawford tells Nate that he grabbed his neck. What the hell was he looking at, nobody made any sort of contact whatsoever with anybody’s neck.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
by iDea on Apr 27, 2010 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
nah, camby kinda hooked hill's neck as he fought around the screen
but it was incidental contact and definitely a questionable foul, especially for the significance in the playoffs. and of course, nash was nowhere near it.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." -- Bertrand Russell
I still don't see it
I’ve watched it over and over and all I see is a player fighting through a screen away from the ball. No foul.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
I'm with you that it's not a foul, I'm just saying there was some contact.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." -- Bertrand Russell
Look, I'm a homer
I feel like my dog died last night. I’m clearly not impartial. And I was confined to enjoy the game via Wheels and Ton last night, so my homerism was def. magnified.
I haven’t said this before but I’m saying now that the refs were absolutely influencing the game. Oh, sure, we probably could have found a way to win in spite of the refs (although no way to prove that). We can definitely question some coaching decisions, play making, etc.
But it remains the case that fouls matter. This one was the most egregious. But you also apparently had guys called for blocking fouls because they were inside the key, when they were not in the key. You had Dre called for a couple travels early. Two illegal defenses early, in a playoff game?
The fact that they tend to even out is moot. For one, it seemed like they made a bad call on guys like Roy and Camby, then “paid us back” with a bad call on Collins. Second you need to look at timing. Roy is coming back from an injury. Hey, maybe he’s late on defense and really did bump a guy, but he is our All Star right? Where’s that special treatment? How about just a little freaking courtesy!
Blah, Thats all i’ve got.
by jiminut on Apr 27, 2010 7:42 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
and the numbers, man just look at the numbers!
We can all pretend that the officiating in this game did not matter. Sure the team should not have collapsed with Camby out. But look at the video and look at the numbers through 3 qtrs of this game:
Camby out (2nd foul) 23-11 4:55 1st
Camby back 34-34 9:21 in second
Camby leaves 47-52 0:52 in second
Camby back 47-57 start of 3rd
Camby Out (4th foul) 58-65 5:20 3rd
Camby back in start of 4th 66-84
In other words, with Camby in, Portland was up 10 (47 – 37)points in the first 3 qtrs (and portland had just cut a 14 point lead to 7 when the 4th call was made), while, with Camby on the bench Portland was down 29 (19-47).
Joey Crawford should face severe consequences for his incompetence.
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Wow...
Yeah, watching the replay, the call is actually worse than I remember. Why was Crawford saying something about Nash being grabbed on the neck? What a strange, strange call.
It's Brandon Roy's world and we're only renting space We don’t like him—we’re only on his side so he doesn’t dunk on us in front of our co-workers, wives, girlfriends, mistresses and children.
-Correction It’s B Rex’s world and Brandon’s just keeping it warm until The Coming
by OhOhOden
by SandyTrailBlazer on Apr 27, 2010 7:52 AM PDT reply actions
Watched that video several times.
No Blazer defender was even within arm’s length of Nash, let alone near enough to grab his neck.
Crawford clearly said – while Nate was standing there silent about the situation as usual – “Hey! Steve Nash: (pointing to the foul line) One plus one.” Then to McMillan as an explanation, “Grabbed his neck.” While he gestured what he says happened.
There can’t be any explanation for this call, or the lack of a correction by the other officials who actually had a good angle to see what was going on (Crawford was on the baseline with about five guys between him and Nash so he couldn’t have seen anything that happened to Nash).
There is no excuse. What ticks me off most about this though is McMillan’s response, virtually nothing. No sticking up for Camby, just standing there mouth moving like a fish out of water. Where’s the passion you want your players to exhibit coach?
"She turned me into a newt!
A newt?
...I got better."
Nash going to the line isn't even what bothered me most.
It’s the fact that this call put Camby back on the bench. We were only down by 7 at this point. For me, this was not only a momentum changer, it was a game changer.
Travis to Patty, "Why you sound like that?"
Surreal. Finally I'm starting to suspect something fishy.
I haven’t blamed the refs for costing us; I believe that, on average, it evens out. But this was weird and makes me wonder that if they’re that willing to call a blatantly non foul, were they doing anything else that was harder to catch?
Maybe they really want to make this go seven games. That’d be good news for us, but why would the NBA care about extending a series that has very low nation-wide appeal? PDX is too small, the Suns have no hip stars, and it’s an all-PDT affair. Hmmmm
by Cepstrum on Apr 27, 2010 8:09 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Gives the Texas winner time to rest
Or if they go to 7 at least no advantage to us. I’m not saying it’s the reason or that there’s even a conspiracy. Just saying if you wanted a reason there’s one right off the top.
by jiminut on Apr 27, 2010 8:53 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
After watching it several times,
it looks like he hits Hill in the neck slightly. It’s a ticky tack call. The real issue is how Crawford mistakes Steve Nash for Grant Hill. With three refs out there, you’d think one of them would have seen that Nash wasn’t the one fouled.
I bet the other refs didn’t help out with that one cuz they had no idea where the foul was or what it was. Joey Crawford was the only one that saw anything on that play
by beckyatthebeach on Apr 27, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions
wow.....
i didn’t realize it was that bad watching on TNT. that is awful
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you’re gonna see some serious [stuff].
The TNT Announcers,
Even noticed that the free throw discrepancy was amazing! And that the Blazers were driving to the hole and getting nothing called.
by RipCityforLife on Apr 27, 2010 10:02 AM PDT reply actions
stunning
Hill of course reacts like the foul is being called on him, for chucking Camby on the way through. It was the only possible foul on this play
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
yeah, I'd call a moving screen on Hill
it’s true that Camby hits hill in the neck, but Hill is coming to set a screen on Camby for Amare (not cutting to get open) and he’s moving. That’s an illegal screen.
The Suns got away with moving screens and picks the entire game. Bayless also got called for a foul for running into a moving pick set by the Suns (Frye or Collins).
the moving screens happen with motion offenses...
Frye was running into defenders all games. It made him especially tough to track on rebounds and I think accounts for some of the offensive boards they got. Frustrating in any case
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on Apr 27, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Yea, there's basically no such thing as a moving screen foul in this series
Frye’s been doing it AAAAHHHH TON!
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
i would not have called anything at all on that play
but I do agree, if I accidentally blew the whistle I would have called it on Hill to save face he was the closest thing to be guilty of a foul (which he wasn’t)
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
I caught this during the game
thanks to the DVR. On the TNT feed it looked like Crawford eventually apologizes to Nate or one of the other officials after realizing that Nash should not be shooting the FT. Then, the following possession (for the Blazers) Crawford calls two touch fouls on the Suns. Make-up calls. At that point, the game lost some credibility to me.
Nothing like two touch fouls on the Suns to make up for the departure of our primary rebounder, huh?
I actually reviewed the calls on the Blazers with the DVR too
There was contact on both plays, but similar contact at other points in the game was not called. In addition, in neither case did the contact give the Suns a significant advantage. Very strange.
Camby was keying everything for us last night
his high post presence on offense created tons of space for our guys
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Attempted make up calls don't do anything when the guy that's holding the team together goes out.
Travis Outlaw fan from the beginning.
Hey Brandon, thanks for the high quality capture
Nice change of pace from some of the youtube stuff out there.
I would submit
that the lack of Linkin Park is what makes it better… haha
Brandon Roy, 'nuff said.
by johnv59 on Apr 27, 2010 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
At first I thought Nash pulled a quick one...
as PGs are known to do in FT situations. But after seeing Crawford blow a whistle while staring directly at Camby/Hill it is clear that Crawford is senile and should be fired. He has made so many absurd calls in the playoffs over the years and the Tim Duncan “Do you want to fight me?” incident would have got anybody else fired in a job situation.
Games 4 and 5 had way too many BS whistles. Let them play in game 6 six and ship Crawford to another series.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Apr 27, 2010 10:58 AM PDT reply actions
The only possible explanation
Camby looked at him with a piercing stare. That must have hurt.
The eternal optimist
by I can't think of a good screen name... on Apr 27, 2010 11:00 AM PDT reply actions
Camby knows all the veteran tricks.
#52
"We have nothing to lose." - Martell
by Cablinasian on Apr 27, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
How come our big men get owned so bad by the refs in the playoffs?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6j8JCajoMA
Hello ladies. Look at your man. Now look at Brandon Roy. Now back at your man. Now back to Brandon Roy. Sadly, he is not Brandon Roy.
Brings back memories of Oden and Pryz
badgering Yao at half court.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
But, at least it hasn't been that bad
and this is the worst call I’ve seen in quite a while.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Thank you so much for posting this.
This should bar Crawford from anymore playoff officiating. I was so disgusted with this I turned off the game and I’m just not going to bother watching any games Crawford has his hands in. I thought calling a T on Duncan while he was on the bench was bad, but he has outdone himself this time. That’s just blowing a whistle for the sake of blowing a whistle.
Life is hilarious.
wowie zowie!
I think Joey anticipated a foul by Roy on Hill and then realizing Roy is our superstar in foul trouble switched it to the next closest Blazer which was Camby.
(which then he realized was also in foul trouble and important in the game)
So he then just said a blazer fouled Nash beacuse Nash usally gets bumped all the time although this time no one was near him. He was probably going to later “correct” the call by taking it from Camby and giving it to was ever closests to Nash.
Then his brain overheated by the complexity of such a thing so he just made a couple of make up calls.
Eeewww. Now I have to go take a shower.
The only foul Camby could have committed was on Hill when squeezing through
And that would be a pretty ridiculous call for a bump
This situation

It happened very shortly before the whistle sounds, 1:20 into the video. If it was ruled as an off the ball foul, and the Blazers were in the penalty, Nash could go to the line. The confusion probably gets created by Crawford yelling Nash’s name to Nate or wherever. There is no way he could have though the foul was directly on Nash.
Why would Nash be allowed to shoot the freethrows if the foul wasn't against him?
If indeed Camby did foul Grant Hill, shouldn’t it have been Hill at the line regardless of who had the ball?
"She turned me into a newt!
A newt?
...I got better."
Also, the entire play was over at the 1:20 mark of the video.
"She turned me into a newt!
A newt?
...I got better."
I think that's only the case on an intentional off the ball foul
to prevent a team from intentionally fouling someone like Shaq so he’ll brick FTs.
"In fact you might say that Ugly is the Blazers' secret weapon this year."
-Dave
As for the Blazers...They are officially the NBA equivalent of a movie serial killer
-basketbawful
For those who care...
Bill Simmons twitter:
sportsguy33
Why the NBA Shouldn’t Have Old Refs, Vol. 981: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaZIAXJJDKQ
...
love it!
- www.ichabodmedia.com
- www.portugaltheman.com
by brandonmitchell on Apr 27, 2010 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
If I had any video editing skills
I’d combine this video with star wars where darth vader used his jedi powers to proxy-choke the lack of faith guy.
Give me #52
by undutchable on Apr 27, 2010 4:26 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Hollinger thought it was a foul...
I think he has been trying so hard not to be a Portland fan that he has actually became an anti-Portland fan.
the NBA is fixed
what more evidence do you need?
Stop watching the playoffs.
Star treatment?
As I watched this last night, this was what I thought must have happened.
1. Crawford whistles Roy for impeding.
2. Nate questions the call, Crawford realizes he whistled the Blazer’s star player for his fourth foul. He quickly changes the foul to Camby, the next closest player to the play, thus protecting Roy.
3. This is where it gets weird. As some sort of cosmic payback for protecting Roy, Crawford quickly decides to send Nash, the Suns best free throw shooter, to the line.
4. Because refs are never supposed to appear to have missed a call or make a mistake, which might cost them their authority, he confidently sends Nash to the line. Much to the wonderment of Steve Nash and everyone else in the universe.
Now, we see this all the time in the NBA. How many times in this series have we seen a Blazer guard get leveled by Amare, only to have the foul called on the trailing defender (if the whistle blows at all)?
I know it’s not a popular view, but I want EVERY ref to call EVERY foul they see, and call it on THE PERSON WHO COMMITTED THE FOUL. It would be ugly for about a half season, but the players would adapt. And we’d have a much more fluid game.
by obrien2020 on Apr 27, 2010 5:59 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
...
Lots of diggs so far on the video, getting a lot of attention all over the internet. I added a link to the digg URL above in the main post. If you have time you should digg it so it gets even more attention.
I’ll post a link with majority of the topics around the internet, kind of interesting to read all of them.
- www.ichabodmedia.com
- www.portugaltheman.com
by brandonmitchell on Apr 27, 2010 11:49 PM PDT reply actions
...
Video is about to be on youtubes front video page
It’s on page two at the top. Well atleast people are viewing it… a lot of people.
- www.ichabodmedia.com
- www.portugaltheman.com
by brandonmitchell on Apr 28, 2010 8:18 AM PDT reply actions
Good catch there with crawfords commemnts while nate was next to him
I didn’t see that durring the game, he actually called for nash to shoot the free throws! wow, i figured nash was just smart and walked up to the line and the refs didn’t catch it. But no, joey is just dirt bag who’s got a sumer home in phoenix.
by New Team Same Dream on Apr 29, 2010 3:26 PM PDT reply actions
...
Guys from failblog just contacted me for the rights… man oh man this wont go away, what have i done!
- www.ichabodmedia.com
- www.twitter.com/ichabodmedia
by brandonmitchell on Apr 29, 2010 3:47 PM PDT reply actions
just saw it on todays big thing...
maybe college humor contacted you too?



































