Question of the Day: Which Opponent?
The buzz today is all about which playoff opponent would be best for the Blazers' chances, so we're going to throw that question out for discussion. If you want to see the possibilities, check out the exhaustive list of outcomes at the end of the Game 82 Preview below. Depending on the outcome of three games tonight (Warriors-Blazers, Spurs-Mavericks, Suns-Jazz) Portland could face either Dallas, Phoenix, or Utah. My general view is that the Blazers have dodged the most treacherous opponents: L.A. and, if healthy, Denver. Portland won't be favored against any of the remaining three but none is a disaster either. That's a good outcome.
Though Utah was widely considered among the worst matchups leading up to the playoffs they're probably not as fearsome as their 4-0 regular season sweep over Portland indicates. Carlos Boozer has gone down with an injury. Paul Millsap is plenty good but he doesn't manhandle LaMacus Aldridge the way Boozer does. Also Portland didn't play those games with Marcus Camby on board. Even with Boozer healthy Camby allows the Blazers the luxury of watching him with Camby, switching Aldridge onto the perimeter-oriented Mehmet Okur. Even if they go conventional having Camby on the floor gives Aldridge defensive back-up he simply didn't have with Juwan Howard. Deron Williams is all-world but Utah doesn't have high-scoring wings to overwhelm Portland in Roy's absence. The Jazz are really at their best with Andrei Kirilenko functional and motivated. He's been injured as well. He'll probably return to the playoffs but who knows in what form. Portland probably wouldn't beat Utah without homecourt advantage but the Blazers could easily win a couple games, maybe pushing for more.
The Blazers have had more regular-season success against Phoenix. This has led Portland fans to underrate the Suns much as they've overrated the Jazz. The main advantage Portland has when playing Phoenix is one Antonio Harvey mentioned on the radio this morning: physicality. Portland doesn't like it, the Suns don't have a ton of it. The Suns don't rebound well on the defensive end and the Blazers love offensive rebounds. Phoenix is also the worst of the four teams in defensive efficiency, ranking 19th in the league where Utah is 11th, Dallas 12th, and Portland 13th. But the Suns' offense is so overwhelming it's hard to be confident facing them. Steve Nash isn't a safe matchup for the Blazers. Even though Miller can overpower him on offense Nash can create enough points to nullify any gain. Amare Stoudemire has abused Portland in the past, though again you may see a Camby switch-over here, leaving Aldridge on Jarron Collins or the distance-shooting Channing Frye. Grant Hill and Jason Richardson know what they're doing too, likely better than Portland's wings without Brandon. Again Portland would certainly win a couple games but over the course of seven the Suns' offense may be too much to contain.
Dallas has the most depth and punch to their lineup of the three opponents. Portland has done well against Dirk Nowitzki this year and he's the one power forward who doesn't scare LaMarcus. On the other hand Erick Dampier, Caron Butler, Shawn Marion, and Jason Terry can all be a handful. Dallas is solid on both ends. About the only thing they don't do well is offensive rebound. Given Utah's injury concerns Dallas would qualify as the most rounded team of the three. However Dallas also offers one advantage that the other two don't...or rather lack the potential to exploit a potential Portland disadvantage. Were I the coach opposing Portland my big red marker would circle Andre Miller's name 92 times on the whiteboard. Without Brandon Roy who else scores, handles the ball, and makes plays with any regularity from the Blazer backcourt? Take out Miller and what do the Blazers do? I would be running play after play for my point guard, making Miller defend (not a bright prospect) and eventually foul. Miller will either get tired, in foul trouble, get scored on incessantly, or Portland will have to commit help and free up somebody else. I'd do the same thing if the Blazers switched Miller off of my point. Whoever he's guarding gets the ball. Unlike Nash and Williams, Jason Kidd does not present the same kind of threat when operating naturally in the Dallas offense. Were I Portland I might even live with Kidd taking tons of shots. Perhaps Jason Terry too if that's how they went. Both eventualities take the ball out of Dirk Nowitzki's hands. Even though Dallas may be the best team of the three, I think Portland's results against them would look similar to the other two.
What are your thoughts? Which team provides the greatest chance of a Blazer breakthrough? Is that the same team that would be the best matchup on average? Who do you want and why? Vote and comment below.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
phoenix
because if i have this right, we’d be playing the winner of Dallas-San Antonio in the 2nd round if we won
dallas is my 2nd choice
"When jumpers are outlawed only Outlaw will take jumpers"-LoadedOrygun
by DominicanAvenger on Apr 14, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
this is my preference as well
If you told me 3 weeks ago our path to the WCF would not include LA, Denver or Utah I would have said Oh Yeah…still do
Oh Yeah!!!
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Robin Lopez is out for the 1st round - improving our chances
they announced that because of the bulging disk in his back that he will be out for the 1st round of the playoffs…he’s not one of their top guys – but he brings the rebounding and inside presence that Stoudemire and Frye don’t.
Without him, I think Camby and LMA will have a field day (at least offensively) against Stoudemire and Frye, and Camby will be able to help out on Amare because Channing just hangs out on the perimeter.
I like our chances against Phoenix if we draw them
by rip_city_swagger on Apr 14, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions
I didn't vote . . .
there was no “happy to be there” choice.
or i could go with Marcus’ comment on the NBA interview after the OKC game and say anyone from the East.
"Better, not good, but better." - Herb Brooks
you wouldn't rather have Phoenix or Dallas, than Utah?
by rip_city_swagger on Apr 14, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure I care that much.
I think our odds are pretty similar against all three.
Based on Dominican’s observation, if I had to pick, it might be the Suns due to the potential 2nd round matchups.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Bring it!
But seriously, I’ve been telling all the Suns fans who want the Blazers to be very careful what they wish for.
Obviously, he will be missed but the Blazers are tough and disciplined and that Batum, LMA, Cambry front line is long and that always gives the Suns troubles.
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
Who will be missed?
Who are you talking about that will be missed? Roy? AFAIK he’s still playing the playoffs. He has postponed the surgery until after the PO’s and gave every indication he plans to tough it out as he cannot injure himself any further. It’s a pain-game for him at this point, and he has stated all ready that the pain is perfectly bearable.
If you're right...
losing to you is way better than losing to the Jazz. I hope you’re not right, but if you are….
"[S]ince men enjoyed very great leisure, they used it to pursue many kinds of commodities unknown to their fathers, and that was that first yoke they placed upon themselves without thinking about it, and the first source of evils the prepared for their descendants. For, besides continuing thus to soften body and mind, as these commodities had lost almost all their pleasantness through habit, and as they had at the same time degenerated into true needs, being deprived of them became much more cruel than possessing them was sweet; and people were unhappy to lose them without being happy to have them." -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Camby *did* play against Utah
Why do people, including this post, keep saying Camby didn’t play against Utah? I’ve also heard this on the radio. It was his second game. http://www.nba.com/jazz/schedule/022110_jazz_at_blazers.html
Yea, yea, I get it ... his effect I'm sure was minimal
Didn’t mean to offend Dave. I love your posts, love it when you’re on “the game,” I just have a boss who is a HUGE Utah fan, and he’s been in my face about the fact that Camby played in that last game. From a female blogger not to be named, less the boss reads this =)
nope, second game, but who's counting =)
We acquired him and hoped he could play against his old team the clippers, but he wasn’t cleared yet, then he played against Boston, then the Jazz.
the it was his second game part is kinda of huge
but I see your point in general
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
I like our chances best against the Suns, although like you say they’re all pretty even. I’m just glad that we avoided the lakers and denver. I think that Utah’s a much better matchup for us with Boozer being injured.
Either way, even without Roy, we shouldn’t give up on the 2nd round!
LET’S GO BLAZERS!!!
Phoenix
I think their lack of physicality is the Blazers best chance at an upset, especially when you consider the loss of Lopez. It would really help Rudy and Martell step up and fill the offensive gap presuming Brandon is done. If Phoenix forgets to play D, I think we could nearly match them blow-for-blow offensively. And Camby and Batum could cause enough havoc defensively that we might have a puncher’s chance.
I also agree with Dominican’s point that first round matchup with Phoenix, setting us up for a second round matchup with Dallas/San Antonio, is the best we could hope for.
"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave
We're pretty evenly matched
We own every team in the Western Conference this year series-wise except Utah and Denver. Utah is the only team we have a chance of seeing in the three who we did poorly against. That being said, without Boozer or Okur in the first round we will absolutely mob Utah. We own Phoenix and Dallas this year, so no problems there, either.
That all being said, I vote Phoenix ultimately.
they are all listed day to day
Date: Player: Injury:
04/14/2010 Carlos Boozer (F) Ribs (Day-to-Day)
04/14/2010 Mehmet Okur © Achilles (Day-to-Day)
04/14/2010 Andrei Kirilenko (F) Calf (Day-to-Day)
although i have never really heard of a day to day achilles injury before
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
That just means they're resting them
although with ceding on the line, who knows? Maybe they don’t want the two cede
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Thanks
Will be interesting to see if he plays. They need the win badly (and we need them to lose) so here’s to hoping he either doesn’t play. I was going to say something else but wishing injuries upon opposing teams is poor sportsmanship. ;)
I grew up a Hawks fan.
In the 1988-89 season, the Hawks easily handled the Milwaukee Bucks during the regular season, winning all 6 games (fewer teams in the league then). We were ecstatic to draw the Bucks in the first round, and were frankly looking ahead to the next round. What happened? The Bucks won the series, including the last game on the Hawks’ home court.
Point is, regular season results are only an indicator of playoff outcomes, not the end-all-be-all.
The only Vulcan with common sense is Spock.
by Badalona Baddie on Apr 14, 2010 12:23 PM PDT reply actions
I like the Blazer's chances in all three of these series
Its a new era when we are in the playoffs with a Blazers team that’s been there together once, with vets who have lots of playoff experience, and we’re not playing LA in the first round. I am really excited.
I'm sticking with my earlier pick of Utah...
If they are beat up a little, all the better. We are due to win one on their court which is even more likely if they are missing some guys. We take one from them and now we got home court. I am not even remotely worried about the possibility of not having Roy nor am I concerned about the second round matchups. You got to look at it game-to-game and play with the cards that are dealt. We’ve been playing good defense and have gutted out some close wins. Bring it on!
"You kill a mosquito with an axe. Nothing personal, but this is what I've got to do. You're in my way right now so I've got to get rid of you and I'll see you next year." -Monty Williams
everyone is relying too much on this Boozer injury
They’re going to do an MRI on him to make sure it’s not something more – but as of now they’re saying it’s a strained muscle in his ribcage. It’s painful, but he can definitely play through it, especially with 3-4 days off before the playoffs start. Bottom line is I wouldn’t say we want Utah because Boozer will be out…because he probably won’t be
I’d say Phoenix is the easy choice here, especially that they’re without Robin Lopez for the 1st round (that’s an actual CONFIRMED fact), and without him will not have a physical presence.
Dallas would be next, and my last choice would be Utah – Deron Williams is ridiculous and I think that’d be tough for us
by rip_city_swagger on Apr 14, 2010 12:37 PM PDT reply actions
I'm not.
Remember , Boozer is the guy that told his teammates to target Batum’s shoulder.
Sweep the leg.
"I think he’s been doing some good things. I think he’s been doing some good things. He’s had to play a lot of minutes lately with Blake being out. I think he’s been doing some good things." -Nate McMillan
is that real?
i mean, where did you hear this from? If its true what a douche… but I question the validity of this statement
I heard that too
Don’t know who was reporting it, but it was floating around
Travis to Patty, "Why you sound like that?"
My memory says the source was Batum himself.
In one of the interviews that he did with local media.
"I think he’s been doing some good things. I think he’s been doing some good things. He’s had to play a lot of minutes lately with Blake being out. I think he’s been doing some good things." -Nate McMillan
the video supports batum's assertion
they checked him high all night, if memory serves
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
yeah, it seems to happen
but I don’t want us to be those guys.
Go at him hard, but don’t try to reinjure him. I don’t want to root for that team.
You know it was Boozer who hit Batum on his injured shoulder, so hey...if he can do it to others...
then maybe he will at least THINK it may be done to him. This alone may throw off his game a bit.
It'll happen
No ifs ands or buts
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Phoenix
Doesn’t matter how efficient their offense is if we limit them to one shot and kill them on the offensive glass. With Roy limited even if he plays, buckets are going to be harder to come by and Phoenix is easier to score on than other choices.
"I think he’s been doing some good things. I think he’s been doing some good things. He’s had to play a lot of minutes lately with Blake being out. I think he’s been doing some good things." -Nate McMillan
I was on the "bring on the L*kers jaunt...
With that gone… I think Utah is vulnerable for the reasons you so succinctly laid out. I just think both Utah and the Blazers are so different from the last time they met. I am confident we can give them a great series and even squeak a series win out.
RoadBlazer
I am torn between Dallas or Phoenix.
For some reason, Utah gives us problems, injuries or not. I ultimately voted Phoenix, but we are in far better position than I ever thought we would be back in December. Phoenix is my 2nd favorite team in the league, but I think the Blazers would win that series. As for Dallas, my hate for Dirk runs very deep, and it would be most satisfying to play, and eliminate, Dallas.
Miller, Camby and Howard FTW. Love me the geezers.
Here's the way I see it
A win sans Brandon will have to be done by the Blazers uglying the game up and playing gritty defense. Out of the 3 teams PHX would get flustered more by an ugly game than the other 3, with Dallas a close second.
Lover of everything Batum.
#88
I don't think so
I don’t think they’ve played at their tempo at all against us this year. Maybe the one in the RG arguably. Even in their one win we lost at our tempo.
Lover of everything Batum.
#88
And we all know that we do ugly REALLY well
reference the Lker game last weekend.
Travis to Patty, "Why you sound like that?"
Uglying the game means different things against different teams
Basically I think it means getting the opponent uncomfortable and then out-hustling them. I think you can do that against any team, whether it be physically (Phoenix) or mentally (utah). Some teams are however more resilient. Phoenix I think has two players who you cannot take out in this manner (Hill, Nash). So I don’t think Phoenix is any more vulnerable to this than Dallas or Utah is.
force Nash to guard miller
will make it ugly…
Running that LMA, Camby, Batum, Webster, Miller lineup at them would probably do the trick…
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
It seems that the Blazers do well against teams that don't play strong D
Phoenix, of those 3, has the least efficient defense. Portland can counterattack a bit with their own stifling defense, to confuse and frustrate Phoenix’s offense.
With our ability to crash the boards and take care of the ball, it is likely that we can easily match them bucket-for-bucket, with our defense being the deciding factor for overall victory. I like those odds, especially with a less-than-explosive Broy (or no Broy). Solid defense against us would likely be game over for us, which is why Phoenix appears to be the best choice.
Dallas doesn't play spectacular defense either compared to Utah. And given Mauer will not be
officiating any Blazer games in the near future…just a guess…I’m sure the Blazers would do just fine against them.
They are also on the older side..most of the team…right? So may be more prone to injury, fatigue. Or they may just warrior up…who knows. I think they’ve caved pretty well in the playoffs in the past.
Assuming no Roy
I don’t care nearly as much. The chances of us advancing went from unlikely to minute. I love the movement and pace of our offense without Brandon but as Dave said, in a playoff situation they are just going to target Dre and force someone else to make plays. The whole advantage of having Brandon and Dre was that teams couldn’t do what Houston did to us last year. Now they can and we have to turn it over to Rudy or Jerryd, who aren’t ready for that responsibility yet.
Ugh
I won't cry.
Also I think the refs may actually be competent in the playoffs. Bet Mauer doesn’t get any playoff games…here’s hoping!
I want Phoenix
because it’s highly unlikely that we’ll beat any of them, and Phoenix is the team out of those three that I would most like to see in the second round. How about a little SA-PHX rematch, for old times’ sake? Too bad Robert Horry is retired …

by 



















