Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Game by Game -- Our Schedule vs The Chasing Pack

The Sched Ahead posts (and the Stupid Sched Projections) look at broad categories of games, which is somewhat helpful, but as we get to the short end of the season, it can be more useful to look at specifics.  This post intends to do precisely that, by showing side by side our remaining schedule vs. that of the teams chasing us.

Star-divide

GROUPINGS

I've listed all games here, but grouped them into six categories.  The distinction between Elite and Contenders is somewhat arbitrary (is Utah elite?  What about OKC?), but still helpful.  There is a difference between playing at L.A. (or at Utah, for that matter) and playing at New Orleans.  I have included as Elite the current top four teams in each conference:  Cleveland, Orlando, Atlanta and Boston in the East, and L.A., Dallas, Denver, and Utah in the West.

Playoff contenders include every team above .500 in the West that isn't in the Elite, and every non-Elite team within 2-3 games of .500 in the East.  These are the teams that are highly motivated to win and are not likely to be easy to beat. 

If you aren't still in contention for a playoff spot, you are a bottom feeder, ten or more games below .500.  In general, teams in the playoff hunt are going to beat bottom feeders at least 80% of the time at this point in the season.  You can't sleep on them, but you should get the W.

If you don't like my categorizations, just shift them a little bit.  The point here is to give a visual picture of the relative difficulty of the remaining games by grouping difficult games together and showing who has the most games near the top of the chart.

I've grouped the games in order of difficulty, as I perceive it.  Most difficult are the road games against the Elites.  Next are road games against Contenders, then home games against the Elites and home games against Contenders.  Finally, you have the games against bottom feeders, divided between home and away.

The second game of a back to back is in italics.  If the opponent is on a back to back, it is bold.  If both teams are playing the second of a back to back, it is both bold and italic.

HOUSTON

If the Blazers are going to be knocked out of the playoffs, it will probably be Houston that does it. 

Portland Houston
at Denver at Boston
at Denver
at L@kers
----- -----
at New Orleans at Chicago
at OKC at OKC
at Phoenix at San Antonio
at Memphis
at Phoenix
----- -----
vs Dallas vs Boston
vs Dallas vs L@kers
vs Utah
vs Denver
----- -----
vs Toronto vs Memphis
vs Oklahoma City vs Charlotte
vs New Orleans
----- -----
at Golden State at Minnesota
at Sacramento at Detroit
at Sacramento at Washington
at Clippers at NYK
at Indiana
at Sacramento
----- -----
vs Indiana vs Sacramento
vs Sacramento vs New Jersey
vs Washington vs Clippers
vs New York vs Washington
vs Golden State
 

Houston has only one road elite game, while we have three, but their schedule isn't any easier than ours.  In total road games against Elites and Contenders, we have the same number as they do, and they have one more back to back.  They have two more Elites at home than we do, and one more Contender.  They also play one more Bottom Feeder than we do, which is a very slight advantage for them, but they have two more on the road than we do, and three of their bottom feeder games are on a back to back, so they are more likely to lose to a bottom feeder than we are.

They have four more games than we do, so we get more rest and practice time than they do the rest of the way.

Current Record

We have 36 wins and 27 losses.  Houston has 30 and 29.  We are six ahead in the win column and two ahead in the loss column, for a four game advantage overall.  Should Houston manage to win all four of their extra games (unlikely, they are a .500 team, remember), they would still be two games behind us.

Tie-breaker 

The first tie-breaker is division winner, Houston won't win their division, and if we manage to win ours somehow, Houston certainly won't be tied with us, so we can treat that as irrelevant.  The second is head to head, and the season series is tied 2-2.  The third tie-breaker is divisional record for intra-division rivals, and Houston is in a different division.  The fourth is conference record, and this is likely the decider.  

We are 23 and 14 in conference, while Houston is 22 and 17.  Can Houston make up that conference deficit?  Of course.  But if they are to catch us, it is probably going to be in part because they sweep their five games against Eastern bottom feeders, which won't help them in-conference at all.  In all probability, we win the tie-breaker based on conference record.  We do have more remaining games against Western elites than they do, however, and if they are to make up the four game deficit, they will almost certainly gain some ground in conference record as well.  I put it at about 50/50 as to who has the best conference record if we end up tied.

Other Factor

Houston has added Kevin Martin, but traded away Carl Landry.  Once they fully assimilate Martin, this is likely to make them marginally better, but the loss of Landry is certainly not insignificant -- this was primarily a trade for the future for Houston.  Yet, it is certainly possible they will play better ball over the next six weeks than they have to date.  On the other hand, we have had Brandon Roy return from injury, and have added Marcus Camby while losing Steve Blake.  In all probability, we have improved more from where we were a month ago than Houston has.  Recent transactions are not likely to have helped Houston significantly more than we have been helped.

Summary

Chances of Houston making up more than a game on us, given the schedule?  Less than 40%, in my opinion.  Chances of them making up a four game deficit?  Probably less than 10%.  Chances of them making up a four game deficit AND winning the tie-breaker, or actually passing us in the standings so they don't need the tie-breaker?  Probably less than 5%.

NEW ORLEANS

The next most likely team to catch us is New Orleans.  This is not because they are significantly ahead of Memphis, or have a particularly easier schedule, but because of the Chris Paul factor.  Before he got hurt, they had really started to play good ball, and if they can stay in reach until his return, they could potentially make a nice run.  Last week and this have been pretty brutal for them as far as the schedule, though, and it is showing in the standings -- they are digging a pretty deep hole right now.

Portland New Orleans
----- -----
at Denver at Denver
at Denver at Utah
at L@kers
----- -----
at New Orleans at San Antonio
at Oklahoma City at Oklahoma City
at Phoenix at Phoenix
at Memphis
at Houston
----- -----
vs Dallas vs Denver
vs Dallas vs Dallas
vs Cleveland
vs L@kers
vs Utah
----- -----
vs Toronto vs Memphis
vs Oklahoma City vs Portland
vs Charlotte
----- -----
at Golden State at Clippers
at Sacramento at Golden State
at Sacramento at New Jersey
at Clippers
----- -----
vs Indiana vs Golden State
vs Sacramento vs Washington
vs Washington vs Minnesota
vs New York
vs Golden State

As you can see, New Orleans has one fewer road game but three more home games against Elites, with two more road games and one more home game against playoff contenders.  In other words, they have many more difficult games remaining than we do.  Conversely, they have three fewer games against bottom feeders.  Their schedule is much, much more difficult than ours, though they do have one less back to back than we do, and only have to play two more games than we do the rest of the way, unlike Houston.  They do have a chance to make up a game if they can beat us in New Orleans, something the other teams don't have going for them -- Houston and Memphis are completely at the mercy of other teams helping them.

Current Record

We have 36 wins and 27 losses.  New Orleans has 31 and 30.  We are five ahead in the win column and three ahead in the loss column, for a four game advantage overall.  Should New Orleans manage to win bothof their extra games (unlikely given the competition), they would still be three games behind us.

Tie-breaker 

The first tie-breaker is division winner, which is irrelevant.  The second is head to head, and the season series is tied 1-1 with one game left, in New Orleans.  It is probably impossible for them to catch us without winning that game, so we should assume that they would win the tie-breaker.  

Other Factor

New Orleans has seen huge improvements from their rookie guards with the extra playing time while Chris Paul is out, and this could continue to benefit them when he returns.  They can run a quality three man rotation in the backcourt and do a lot of damage, and they are pretty solid in the front court, too.  The return of Chris Paul should definitely help them, and it is easy to see New Orleans playing much better ball.  Whether this will be enough to overcome the difficulty of their schedule is another question.  Whether it will be enough to counteract the return of Brandon Roy and the addition of Marcus Camby also remains to be seen.

Summary

Chances of the Hornets making up any ground on us, given the schedule, and the fact that Chris Paul is still out?  Less than 20%, in my opinion.  Chances of them making up a four game deficit?  Probably less than 2%. 

Memphis

Memphis is almost certainly done.  Their remaining schedule is much, much tougher than ours.  Their best hope is that San Antonio stumbles on a very difficult schedule, and that they win their remaining two games against the Spurs.  That would significantly reduce their deficit while also giving them the tie-breaker.

Portland Memphis
at Denver at Boston
at Denver at Orlando
at L@kers at Dallas
at Denver
----- -----
at New Orleans at New Orleans
at Oklahoma City at Chicago
at Phoenix at Houston
at Milwaukee
at San Antonio
at Oklahoma City
----- -----
vs Dallas vs Denver
vs Dallas vs Dallas
----- -----
vs Toronto vs San Antonio
vs Oklahoma City vs Chicago
vs New Orleans
vs Houston
----- -----
at Golden State at Sacramento
at Sacramento at Golden State
at Sacramento
at Clippers
----- -----
vs Indiana vs New Jersey
vs Sacramento vs New York
vs Washington vs Golden State
vs New York vs Philadelphia
vs Golden State

It's a sorry tale if you are a Memphis fan hoping to catch Portland.  They have one more road game than us against the Elite, three more road games against playoff contenders, and two more home games against playoff contenders.  They have six games against bottom feeders to our nine games.

Current Record

We have 36 wins and 27 losses.  Memphis has 30 and 30.  We are six ahead in the win column and three ahead in the loss column, for a four and a half game advantage overall.  Should New Orleans Memphis manage to win all three of their extra games (unlikely), they would still be three games behind us.

Tie-breaker 

The season series ended tied 2-2.  The next relevant tie-breaker is conference record, and ours is 23-14, while theirs is 17-21.  They will not win the tie-breaker unless we collapse so badly (and they play so well) that they surpass us in the standings anyway.  

Other Factor

We have Brandon back now and have added Marcus.  They have no reason to expect their team to be any better than it has been.  Just one more reason why they aren't catching us.

Summary

Chances of the Grizzlies making up any ground on us, given the schedule?  Less than 20%, in my opinion.  Chances of them not only catching us, but passing us, making up a full five games?  Probably less than 0.5%. 

I'll try to do a similar comparison with San Antonio and OKC in the next couple of days.

Comment 57 comments  |  17 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

WELL DONE

LOOKING FORWARD TO THE S.A. AND O.K.C. COMPARISON A LOT!

by thankyouforblaze on Mar 4, 2010 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Your patience and diligence with this schedule stuff is AMAZING!

As a fellow B Edger I really appreciate the effort. The schedule info kind of feels like “secret decoder ring” stuff from when I was a kid. I feel like we are being given secret knowledge of what is going to happen even before it does. Thanks.

by upper left corner on Mar 3, 2010 6:15 AM PST reply actions  

Hey, that sounds cool!

Maybe instead of setting my sights on Future Ruler of the World, I should become Keeper of the Secret Knowledge.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 8:07 AM PST up reply actions  

You just can't tell anyone if you do.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Mar 3, 2010 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

That would have its drawbacks

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I echo the kudos of the other posters

Being reasonably confident the Blazers will reach the playoffs, I’d be more interested in seeing the liklihood of them catching teams ahead of them.

Keep up the great work.

by LaughingJon on Mar 3, 2010 7:45 AM PST reply actions  

I hope to do that post soon

I figure I’ll target S.A., OKC, and Phoenix. I think the others can’t be caught unless they hit a really bad spell or have a key injury, and if that happens, any kind of analysis is going to be suspect anyway..

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 8:06 AM PST up reply actions  

perfect!

i feel like any of those 3 teams mentioned above could get on a bad streak, but the question is, Who do we went to see in the playoffs? that’s more or less the question that sjould be addressed. i think we may see an advantage playing LA than Denver or Dallas.

by thankyouforblaze on Mar 4, 2010 1:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Not as much work as it looks

I long ago perfected the art of looking like I’m doing more than I am.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 8:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Talent?

In my book, talent is something you naturally have.

This is not talent, this is skill — that which has been painstakingly perfected through countless hours of practice.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Damn, another thing I've gotten backwards.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Mar 3, 2010 12:48 PM PST up reply actions  

You're so good at doing it backwards

that no one believes you are doing it backwards.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

That's a value added post

Looking forward to your analysis of the teams ahead of us

by JMoon on Mar 3, 2010 8:21 AM PST reply actions  

Under the "Current Record" of the Memphis section you state:

“We have 36 wins and 27 losses. Memphis has 30 and 30. We are six ahead in the win column and three ahead in the loss column, for a four and a half game advantage overall. Should New Orleans manage to win all three of their extra games (unlikely), they would still be three games behind us.”

I think you meant Memphis and not New Orleans, right?

Dagnab cut & paste!

Patty Mills - PG of the future. Book it.

by Blazerholic on Mar 3, 2010 8:32 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Fixed, thanks

Rec for your last line.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Great stuff as always

can we get the same treatment except with Phoenix, OKC, and San Antonio?

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 8:41 AM PST reply actions  

Well, I said it was coming in a day or two

but it looks like you jumped the gun. :)

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions  

sorry

just couldn’t wait. hope you don’t mind

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Saves me some work

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Ok, here is the Spurs - Brutal!

I didn’t mark the (bold) opponent back to backs, but I did italicize the Spur back to back games. There lineup is really tough, which is why I think we will pass them:

@ Cleveland
@ Orlando
@ Atlanta
@ Boston
@ LA Lakers
@ Denver
@ Dallas
-———————————
@ Memphis
@ Miami
@ OKC
@ Phoenix

-—————————-
vs LA Lakers
vs Cleveland
vs Orlando
-—————————
vs Memphis
vs Houston
vs New Orleans
-————————-
@ Minnesota
@ Sacramento
@ New Jersey
-————————
Minnesota
Golden State
NY Knicks
LA Clippers

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 8:54 AM PST reply actions  

I think the Spurs are out

They have been real bad against good teams this year.

Although of course that assumes that a team (probably NO) can hang close enough, in NO’s case until they get Paul back.

We’re looking very good to make it as at least #7.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Mar 3, 2010 8:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Out?

Unlikely. They are 34 and 24, that’s six games ahead of New Orleans in the loss column. If the Hornets had swept their two games this week, maybe, but the Spurs won in New Orleans.

The Spurs have been well nigh invincible against losing teams this year, and they’ll get at least 6 of the remaining 7 in the last two groups, at least 2 and probably three or four in the middle two groups (home games against good teams), and very possibly one or two against the next group. The road games against Elites are tough, but they’ll get one or two there, too. I can’t see them getting less than ten more wins, which would be 44, and I expect them to get somewhere between 46 and 48. I don’t see any of the chasers getting close to that.

But they aren’t a high seed.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Bold games

(none)
--
at OKC (bold and italic)
--
vs Orlando
--
vs Houston
--
(none)
--
vs Clippers (bold and italic)
vs Houston

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

now if only i had an edit...

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Repost it all as a fanpost

You’ve done the work.

I’ll get you the other bold ones, because that’s the only hard part, and my spreadsheet does it all….

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

nah, you go ahead and edit this post with it, or add another

you can give me a shout out for the minor help if you want, no big deal. just doing some grunt work.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

If I get to it today, I'll edit this

Or I’ll do another later.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Certainly not when most Bedgers do

I’m in a much different time zone.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

and now OKC

@ Denver
@ Boston
@ Dallas
@ Utah
-——————————
@ Portland
@ Charlotte
@ Toronto
-—————————
vs Denver
vs LA Lakers
vs Utah
-————————-
vs Phoenix
vs Memphis
vs San Antonio
vs Houston
vs Portland
vs New Orleans
-————————
@ Golden State
@ Philadelphia
@ Indiana
@ LA Clippers
@ Sacramento
-—————————
vs New Jersey
vs Minnesota

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 9:03 AM PST reply actions  

it's going to be tough to catch the Blunder

I think it’s going to require us to get really hot to end the year, 14-5 or better. Not impossible, but not likely either. There are enough tough games up there to think OKC could lose 8 or 9 more, but we’ve been saying for a few weeks now that they’ve got to start dropping, and they haven’t yet — 12-2 in their last 14 games, which included wins over Den, Atl, NO, Por, and Dal.

to catch OKC we really need to win both against them, get hot everywhere else, and hope the Blunder have a few rough patches. Their game at Denver tonight is huge for our chances – we really need Denver to win this one. After that, any OKC falloff will likely wait awhile – they could easily rattle off another 7 of 8 stretch the next two weeks. A lot of easy games before they hit the tough patch. Don’t panic if we haven’t made up ground by March 21 – the real test is after that. If they are going to lose some games in groups, it’s going to happen late in the year when their schedule toughens up and their opponents are fighting for position or even their playoff lives.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

They are young

It is possible playoff pressure will have an impact. If they don’t lose some unexpected games, I don’t think we catch them unless we have an incredible finish.

If we can get them in both of our games against them, that would help. We’re on a back to back both times, which in a normal season would be a drawback, but perhaps we keep winning those. :) If we get them in both games, that would give us the tie-breaker as well, and suddenly, it might start to get nervous for them.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

I put our odds at about 20% of catching them

need everything to fall just right. sweeping the two games against them is huge. them losing tonight is huge. them having a bad homestand late month (SA, Hou, Lakers, Port) is huge. a bad late road trip is huge (Phi, Bos, Dal). losing 2 out of 3 a bit after that (@Uta, vsDen, vsPho) is huge.

We really need all those things to happen, and we need to get hot on top of it.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Hmm

They are four ahead in the loss column, but we’ve got the same number of wins in the bank. If we sweep the two games against them, that margin becomes very small indeed.

I think your percentage is right, but I don’t think we need quite all of those huge things to happen. If we get hot AND we sweep them, that may be enough.

But I really doubt we do it unless we sweep them, because they almost certainly end up with a better division record, and get the tie-breaker. I don’t see us making up FIVE in the loss column if we split the two with them, which is what it would take.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

i figure to catch them we need them to lose at least 9

(which means we went 14-5 the rest of the way).

1 tonight
2 against us
2 other losses in that homestand
2 in that boston road trip
2 in that next stretch

that’s 9. that’s everything I mentioned. of course you can take some of them out, but then you have to add in some losses elsewhere against poor teams.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Bold games

(none)
--
at Portland (bold and italic)
at Charlotte
--
(none)
--
vs San Antonio (bold and italic)
vs Portland
--
at Golden State
--
vs Minnesota (bold and italic)

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

and Phoenix

@ Utah
-————————
@ Chicago
@ OKC
-——————————-
vs LA Lakers
vs Utah
vs Utah
vs Denver
-———————————-
vs New Orleans
vs Portland
vs San Antonio
vs Houston
-———————————-
@ LA Clippers
@ Golden State
@ New Jersey

@ Detroit
@ Milwaukee
@ Minnesota
-————————————
vs Indiana
vs New York
vs Minnesota

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:29 AM PST reply actions  

uncatchable IMHO

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

oops, I have Milwaukee in the wrong place

move them up to 2nd group.

still uncatchable though

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Bold games

at Utah (bold and italic)
--
at Milwaukee (bold and italic)
--
vs Denver
--
vs San Antonio
--
(none)
--
vs Indiana

The question with Phoenix is whether it will be the Phoenix of November and February that plays out the rest of the season, or the Phoenix of December and January. Two different teams.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 3, 2010 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm going to say we win 49 this year (putting us at 13-6 the rest of the way)

in order to catch the teams ahead of us, we would need them to do the following:
Spurs: 15-9 or worse
Blunder: 13-10 or worse
Suns: 11-9 or worse

odds of each of those happening in my opinion (made up numbers I pulled out of the air)
Spurs: 75%
Blunder: 25%
Suns: 10%

the more I look at things, the more certain I am that we are going to finish 7th.

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

There is at least a 75% chance we finish either 7th or 8th

Firmly in favor of making a coaching change at the end of the season.
Free AK1984

by jksnake99 on Mar 3, 2010 2:46 PM PST reply actions  

pretty close

I’d say 5% we miss entirely, 20% we finish 5th/6th, and 75% we finish 7th/8th

"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare

by douglast on Mar 3, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

As of now

After Houston and New Orleans both lost winnable home games, I’d say there’s at most a 2% chance we misse the playoffs, unless we have yet another catastrophic injury.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 4, 2010 2:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Hollinger has us at 95.1%

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 4, 2010 7:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Great work as usual Jscot!!! Love these. I rec every one.

I just don’t see us tripping up too bad at this point. We really seem to be gelling lately with that easy schedule.

"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden

by dario argento on Mar 3, 2010 10:39 PM PST reply actions  

What a sinister question

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 4, 2010 2:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I’m not worthy – just a shack on the fringe of your kingdom will suffice.

Preferably one with a good view.

Romance me with that Roy rainbow shot which took flight from way beyond the arc and sailed so high that before it came back down to earth sealing the victory, it kissed the rafters and said "You're mine baby."

by Blazer1342 on Mar 6, 2010 7:30 AM PST reply actions  

Instead of a view

I’ll give you a framed picture of myself. I’m sure you will like that better.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Mar 6, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

I just hope you don’t jack up the cable rates.

Romance me with that Roy rainbow shot which took flight from way beyond the arc and sailed so high that before it came back down to earth sealing the victory, it kissed the rafters and said "You're mine baby."

by Blazer1342 on Mar 6, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm