Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Game 71 Recap: Blazers 87, Suns 93

Long Story Short:  The Blazers mess around with the Suns for three quarters like we were Tiger Woods and they were a Denny's hostess but the Suns turn it on in the fourth, burning Portland for their game-long indiscretions.  Andre Miller has a spectacular first half while Brandon Roy posts a horrible offensive effort.  The two invert as the game progresses with Roy scoring late and Miller playing ineffectively.

The Game

Once again tonight both the Blazers and their opponents play a scrappy game for...wait.  Did I say "scrappy"?  What's that "s" doing in there?  My bad.  Far from being the barn-burner, playoff-ready contest I anticipated in the preview, this game turned out to be a junk-fest for the better part of three quarters for both teams.  I'd love to say it was a titanic defensive struggle but in actuality both teams followed a similar offensive formula:

Option 1:  Four passes to a contested jumper.

Option 2:  Twelve dribbles to a contested leaner.

The futility was broken only by the occasional fast break bucket or offensive rebound put-back.  But this wasn't the worst thing in the world for the Blazers, as Portland Ugly beats Phoenix Ugly.  In fact you might say that Ugly is the Blazers' secret weapon this year.  I was pleasantly surprised that the Blazers were able to keep the game a contest of rebounds, bumps, and stunted halfcourt offense.  Every time the ESPN cameras caught Phoenix coach Alvin Gentry in the huddle he was begging his team not to do this, not to play Portland's game, not to fall into the slower tempo.  Yet there Phoenix was, walking the ball up the court, prosecuting Options 1 and 2 above as if they were imitating Portland instead of trying to beat them.

The Blazers were aided and abetted in their strategy by the fine play of Andre Miller early.  Miller went right at Steve Nash and quickly got him in foul trouble.  Once Nash went out of the game Portland's strategy became simple:  deny Amare Stoudemire whenever possible and double-team him whenever necessary.  After an early flurry Stoudemire wasn't a factor for most of the game.  Without Nash and with Amare muzzled the Suns had real trouble producing points.  Marcus Camby also deserves mention for his 10 rebounds in the first quarter.  As the game had turned into a battle of the boards, Camby was pretty much a Sherman Tank out there.

Alas, all good things must come to an end, especially the significance of two fouls.  When Nash returned later in the half he looked to personally take it out on Miller, driving past him at will.  The Blazers, meanwhile, showed bad spacing when they were on the run and poor recognition in the halfcourt.  More often than not they ended up with 1-on-1 moves for jump shots.  The only respite came when Miller had the ball, as he drove back at Nash and looped a few alley-oop and fast break passes as well.  That aside, Portland's rebounding energy began to dip.  The offensive rebounds disappeared.  The defensive rebounds were heavily contested.  Phoenix was fighting back.  Portland had scored 26 to Phoenix's 21 in the first quarter.  The score was exactly inverted in the second, 26-21 Phoenix.  The game was tied at the half.

The third period promised a momentum shift, as both teams by that point had to realize this important game was up for grabs.  But like two marathon runners cautious about making a move too early, both kept plodding along.  The Suns' offense was worse than ever.  The only thing saving them from an abysmal period was a few offensive rebounds.  It got so bad for them that at one point they had an uncontested 8-second violation.  (In normal times Phoenix is famous for having a shot up by the 16-second mark.)  The Blazers just kept clamping down on Amare.  Nash and his teammates couldn't compensate.  The pick and roll was nowhere to be found.  It was like Phoenix was playing with one hand tied behind their back. This was the time for Portland to strike.  But for the most part "strike" meant the same jumper-laden, poorly-spaced offense they had run all night.  Brandon Roy in particular was suffering horribly, missing everything he threw up.  Without Roy hitting the heart of the Blazer offense, and all of the pressure on Phoenix, was gone.  Phoenix scored 17 in the quarter but the Blazers managed only 21.  Portland up 4 heading home.

The fourth period began with the Suns saying, "Enough of this s-less scrappy offense."  They detected Portland's Juwan Howard, a second-unit substitution, on Amare Stoudemire.  Connecting the dots from A to B (which was about as complex as they had to go) they gave Amare the ball and let him work.  Stoudemire burned Howard twice and Portland's help defense came way late.  On a third play the help defense just fouled Stoudemire outright.  After that flurry of points from the big guy the second unit experiment was over.  At the same time, however, Brandon Roy started taking over and actually hit a couple shots.  For all of the Amare-inspired danger the game was still tied.

But that's where the party ended.

The Phoenix Suns made a strategic move in the fourth, throwing on a zone defense.  Portland responded by treating the zone like it was the Riddle of the Sphinx tied up in the Gordian Knot and stuffed into a Rubik's Cube.  The key to beating the zone is to get the ball in the middle of the floor, much as when attacking an opposing pair in doubles tennis.  You put the ball down the center, forcing them to decide how to manage.  Every time the Blazers did this they got an easy shot and/or a foul.  Unfortunately "every time" turned out to be thrice in the quarter.  Other than that it was a process of getting stuck on the sidelines, forced into long jumpers with hands in faces, having never probed the center portion of the court in any significant way.  The only thing that bailed the Blazers out was a couple offensive rebounds early.  After that scoring was like pulling teeth.  Brandon Roy's offense, while improved in the period, was a mixed blessing as he took time setting up his shot.  He was the main guy getting inside for easy buckets when they happened but he was also taking a fair amount of those jumpers and/or bleeding the clock until they became necessary for someone else.

Meanwhile Phoenix, forcing misses and still acquitting themselves well on the boards, found their run and gun game.  It started with Jared Dudley scoring 8 quick points off of a couple threes and a layup.  Then Grant Hill got a couple instant shots unopposed.  All of a sudden the Blazers were down 8, still unable to score.  The Suns wouldn't make another field goal in the game after Hill's second shot, but they hit 7 of 8 free throws down the stretch.  Adding insult to injury, the Blazers missed 5 free throws in the final period.

The Blazers were still within 5 with 40 seconds left but Phoenix had the ball.  Portland threw on the press and forced another 8-second violation.  The ensuing offensive set was as desultory as they all had been but Roy made it look good with a desperation, bail-out three-pointer, cutting the deficit to 2.  The Blazers fouled Nash with 19 seconds left and he hit both, sending the Suns back up 4.  After another eye-gouging, weak-pick-setting, running-around-the-perimeter set (out of a timeout, no less) Andre Miller finally heaved a three-point jumper of his own which missed solidly.  The game was over already when Grant Hill hit the obligatory final free throws, pushing the margin to 6, 93-87 Suns.

A look at the boxscore seems to indicate that the Blazers did a number of things right tonight.  Portland shot 36.4% but Phoenix managed only 38.8% which has to be considered a significant advantage towards the Blazers.  Portland put up 8 more shots than the Suns.  Offensive rebounds were 14-10, Portland.  Assists were 16-14, Portland.  The Blazers committed only 4 turnovers.  Portland actually beat Phoenix in fast break points 11-8 and points in the paint 42-36.  All of that is screaming out a Blazers victory.  However the Suns shot 24-26 from the foul line (92.3%) while Portland managed only a respectable 21-29 (72.4%).  Credit Phoenix there and Portland for tightening up at the line down the stretch.  Phoenix shot 7-23 from the three-point arc, an anemic (for them) 30.4%.  That would seem to seal their fate.  Except the Blazers shot 2-17...11.8%.  Portland had open threes throughout the game too.  They just missed.  Not learning their lesson, they kept at it when the threes were covered late.  And there you have it.  Neither team played like a playoff contender.  Neither team looked good.  But Portland played around too much and left the door open and the Suns had a couple matchups, a couple good moments, and enough experience to capitalize on both.

Individual Notes

Brandon Roy scored 23 tonight to lead all scorers but don't bother believing in that much.  This was a wretched offensive effort from him, saved by a fourth-quarter spurt.  He went 8-25 for the game, hit 1-5 threes...about the only thing up to par was his 8 free throw attempts, of which he hit 6.  He had 8 rebounds as well.  But really this was among the worst games I've seen him play in a while.

LaMarcus Aldridge had a couple moments on the boards but he shot 6-15 himself for 16 points and 8 rebounds.  He helped curtail Amare's run in the fourth and had a decent defensive game, at least to the point he was stretched.

Andre Miller had an amazing first half and even played well through part of the third quarter.  It was like he became Brandon Roy tonight, punishing the Suns on the drive and with the pass both.  He keyed the Portland fast break, momentarily making it look better than Phoenix's.  Even though Nash was striking back at him Miller had the upper hand in that battle early, which should have been enough to swing the tide for Portland.  Unfortunately both his game and the Blazers' fell apart late and in the fourth quarter--whether he was tired, thrown off by Brandon taking over, or just lost the mojo--Miller was almost painful to watch.  He went 8-9 from the foul line and had 22 points and 9 assists, which was fantastic.  He went 7-20 from the floor, which was OK.   He went 0-6 from three point range, which is enough to make you scream, "Why are you taking six three-pointers?!?"

Marcus Camby played a healthy 35 minutes and had that dominating first quarter with 10 rebounds.  He calmed down after that though, ending up with 16 total.  He had 5 blocked shots and did a nice job on Amare when he had him.

Nicolas Batum played 32 minutes but looked a step slow on defense all night, much as he did against Golden State earlier.  He garnered 6 personal fouls and went 1-6 from the three-point arc with 8 points, 4 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals.  He sure is purdy when he finishes on the break though.

Juwan Howard got 20 minutes and went 4-6 from the field for 8 points and 4 rebounds.  He was one of the few Blazers who looked normal out there instead of clenched.  However "normal" for Juwan isn't enough to cover defensive responsibilities against Amare Stoudemire one-on-one and he didn't get much help tonight.

You can pretty much see that the confidence level for Martell Webster and Jerryd Bayless is as low as that Tiger Woods joke I started the recap with.  Jerryd played defense with blinders on, missed jumpers, and just couldn't get anything going.  He went 0-5 in 12 minutes for 1 point with 2 personal fouls.  Martell just doesn't look like he knows what anyone expects him to do out there.  He's drifting everywhere.  Maybe it's the reduction in minutes since Batum came back.  Maybe it's another hot start to the seasons that peters out at the end.  Maybe this is just Martell.  0-2, 0 points, a rebound, a block, and a foul in 18 minutes.

My bad above.  Dante Cunningham also looked normal for his 4 minutes with a rebound, a block, and a very nice conversion at the hoop for 2 points.  His confidence hasn't gone anywhere.  His posture and energy are perfect, 4 minutes or 24.

So...the Blazers have a few more days off to think about this game and their next one.  They'll probably not catch the Suns at this point, though Portland still owns the tiebreaker.  The Spurs lost tonight as well, leaving Portland 2 games behind them in the loss column, also owning the tiebreaker.  The Thunder lost to the Pacers, of all teams.  Considering the schedule they have left if they're going to lose to Indiana maybe the Blazers can catch them.  On the disastrous end of the scale Houston won, leaving them 3 games behind Portland in the loss column.

Boxscore

Hear the chortles, or at least sighs of relief, at http://www.brightsideofthesun.com

See your Jersey Contest scores here and enter Thursday's game here.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 77 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I do like that they played at our pace

I wish we had looked more comfortable at our pace. Here’s to three days of shooting drills and practice against zones

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Mar 21, 2010 11:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Three days of drills?

Why not just have Roy show for practice if all of Nate’s offence (Brit. sp. refer to Game Day thread reply) against the zone revolves around and evolves from Brandon?

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Did you have a chance to listen to Nate during the timeouts?

all of ESPN’s audience heard him saying move the ball quickly and cut, and go hard to the him. It was not executed on the floor. I was wondering why Andre got so passive

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Mar 22, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

What?

Isn’t it ‘go hard to the RIM’? Or did you really mean go hard to the HIM? Would the him be Roy? No wonder Andre was passive and/or reluctant? Spellcheck does not cure all ills.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes I heard him

Given Nate’s lack of an effective offensive (Playboy spelling) against a zone, going hard to the rim means give Roy the ball and go to the rim to get the subsequent rebound.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I noticed that we did not get many offensive rebounds during this stretch

which is uncharacteristic of the Blazers, and any team against a zone. Its because no one was moving. Most of the Blazers were watching from the perimeter. It was easy for the Suns to account for their area and a Blazer when the rebound came off. I don’t think this is the coach’s or anyone else’s offense.

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Mar 22, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Standing around?

Loitering is a side effect of a team that does not have a clue. A plan ‘B’, developed in practice sessions, would be nice just in case a team comes at us with a zone defence. Drills, as you previously suggested, that enhances the execution of the plan could do wonders. Who would think? Telling the team to go hard and quick to the rim as a reaction to being stopped by a zone defence is hardly NBA level coaching.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is the fact that Webster...

“just doesn’t look like he knows what anyone expects him to do out there. He’s drifting everywhere.”

A Webster problem or a coaching staff problem?

by OmoriumVerum on Mar 22, 2010 12:01 AM PDT reply actions  

probably both

Nate has been terrible outlining expectations all season, but Webby needs to step up.

I must say, he did a fine job on Amare in the second half when batum was out with foul trouble. He deserves credit for that.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Almost all game I was thinking "This is so winnable!!"

Then was screaming for the last 5 minutes to just get to the rim in any way possible. Roy was the only one who seemed to hear me, but of course the suns were watching that, so his lone effort was not enough.

This is a night where I missed Fernandez, and why did Webster not even ATTEMPT a 3 point shot?

by Sir.Ludo on Mar 22, 2010 12:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow

Well this is my first time ever posting here but i have been a reader all year. This game just shocked me. We could not seem to get anything in tonight but it was still a close game. We did not have a go to guy tonight at all. Usually LA or Roy can step up and carry some of the slack but it didnt happen for us tonight.

by manudevil20 on Mar 22, 2010 12:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Portland is soft.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Mar 22, 2010 12:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Who did better?

Why single him out? Maybe Camby did better. But Nate’s offence against the zone took the ball out of the Blaze’s hands.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Miller, Camby & Howard are our 3 best players,

were going to be in trouble. I must quote Mike Rice “somebody step up!”

Batumshakalaka!

by We-B-Dunkin on Mar 22, 2010 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

It could well be

that those three veterans understood the nature of the game better than the others…not that they’re better players, rather they stepped up more at the right time.

—Dave

by Dave on Mar 22, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does better mean more to offer?

The Tired Trio has kept the Blazers in the race more than any other force with maybe the exception being KP. By the way, good article again, Dave. It seemed I had to wait a few more minutes for this recap. Step it up, Dave, you can’t keep us waiting like that!

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

it looked to me

like he sprained his ankle on that fast break play where the ball was poked out from behind. That’s right about when his spedometer went from 55 to 0. But without Rudy and Bayless being completely incapable of anything tonight (side note, whats up with that?) I guess we just stuck with gimpy Andre in the 4th.

by Billy Hoyle on Mar 22, 2010 5:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think he will be ok

But I am sure he is kicking himself for throwing those threes up when Nate’s offense against the zone defense gave him no other option than to put the ball in the cold hands of Roy.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

man, I knew chinafanheartsroy was actually tominhawaii!

pretty clever Tom, pret-ty clever!

How am I not myself? How am I not myself?

by thankyouforblaze on Mar 22, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I mean Dave's assessment

and plus no way nate would ever approve miller took 6 3s in a game.

by chinafansheartroy on Mar 22, 2010 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

More like 3 or 4 3's

Remember, a few of those were last second full court heaves.

The others were largely shot because he was handed the ball with like 2 seconds left on the shotclock. Nate definitely doesn’t approve of Miller ever taking 6 3’s when there are so many other 3 shooters on the team, but then again, that’s what he gets for running iso plays for Roy over and over again even when Roy’s shot just wasn’t falling. Roy drags the clock out, suddenly finds that he can’t work around the defense, so he tosses the ball to the nearest guy, which sometimes happened to be Miller with the seconds ticking furiously. Miller has no option but to try the 3, no?

by thetsaiguy on Mar 22, 2010 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

agree

what is Andre supposed to do? waste a shot…..not a fair criticism

Portland Trail Blazers - where injuries and people come together"

by debra31098 on Mar 22, 2010 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

anytime

Andre shoots a jump shot past 18 feet, its a wasted shot.

by Haymon45 on Mar 22, 2010 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

he stepped on someone foot at full speed leading a fast break

Miller was looking awesome up to that point, after that gone, so i imagine that affected the rest of his night. he’ll be fine for Dallas tho

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

he continued to play, so it’s probably not a bad sprain, but you’ll see that he lost the hop in his step afterwards. Could affect his aggressiveness for a couple of games but I doubt he’ll sit out, being the NBA ironman and all

by Billy Hoyle on Mar 22, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Andre is the greatest

But he did throw up some hopeless threes with ample time to execute a play, but he knew if he did, the ball would eventually land in Brandon’s hands whose FG% for the game was lower than Miller’s 3pt%. And that was worse than hopeless; it was pathetic. Roy was much better as a rebounder than a shooter. MG Roy played 45 minutes with little to show for it but a sore hamstring, knee, and hip. Is Nate’s only hope when the Blazers are down or close that Roy will pull something out of his A. to win the game? Maybe Roy could set a pick instead of raising his hand for the ball. Maybe Nate and Roy should get more imaginative or just get a room.

by thebigoutdoors on Mar 22, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brandon Roy did as much as he ould for how off he was. I like the aggressiveness. This team better start getting used to

it. Camby is really doing work for this team, I am very impressed. If only Batum could have hit some of his open 3’s. His shot is so nice, man eventually those are going to start to drop. Stroke is too good to not get more consistant.

by BRoyInThe4th on Mar 22, 2010 2:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I think he's in a mini slump

and I think part of his problem is that he’s not a volume shooter like Martell/Rudy from 3. He’s more Matt Bonner than Rashard Lewis (low volume vs high volume). This is heavy duty armchair coaching from me, but regardless I think it’s all mental right now, and the one thing he should not do is start to press in order to try to cover his mistakes.

"B-Roy is the best shooting guard I have played against"

-Ron Artest

by premthegrem on Mar 22, 2010 2:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

right, it is mental

2 things Roy needs to improve on:

1. Moving without the ball, cutting to the rim. I know he is at his best usually witht he ball in his hands, but if he hits an off night he has nothing to turn to in his game. Allowing him to be set up off of hard cuts could help him get easier looks on an off night.

2. End Game clock management – This has been an ongoing issue for Portland. Roy’s last 3 should have went up at least 8 seconds earlier, had it we could have played defense, trying to get a stop and still have time left on the clock. The way it worked out we ended up settling for a foul on the best foul shooter in the league, no chance to win at that point.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was wondering about what you said.

It seemed to me like his problem started after he had listened to Kobe and decided to be more selfish. I don’t know if that is a good thing or a bad thing, but anytime you make a change in your style in any sport, it takes a while to make it work.

At this time, it seems to be hurting BRoy’s game, and this is not the time to make big changes in his game. The things he need to make big changes in should be done this summer instead of taking the summer off.

hg

hg

by BBK on Mar 22, 2010 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Things he can change

Defense- If O is not going, more effort on D would be nice.

More hustle in general (say on a fast break).

If you ever just watch him solely, his total effort is questionable at best on D and in transition, it is like he is in slow motion. Even on offense, he doesn’t do much without the ball. Don’t get me wrong, I like BRoy, but I believe he needs to pick-up his total effort to 1)take his game to the next level & 2) lead by example (when you think of hustle plays, intangibles, all out effort…you think of Batum, Bayless, or Rudy). I just wish he became a little more demonstrative and played with a little more energy on both ends of the floor.

by keeweekid on Mar 22, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah reading the comments at oregon live makes me think back to what Jason Quick said earlier in the year. You can't just nip pick every single

issue that comes up with this team. If you do that in life, you would be miserable. Some Blazer fans really need to check themselves. We could have Randy Foye and Tyrus Thomas right now, and where would we be? There would be no Rip City revival, Blazer basketball would be dead and in the ice age right now.

Fans need to be more patient with this team.

by BRoyInThe4th on Mar 22, 2010 3:51 AM PDT reply actions  

nit picking is fun

While I agree that mean spirited comments are over the top, these guys obviously need to improve. people have differing ideas on what the improvements should be, hence the lively conversations on BE

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Such a big loss.

These types of games are the ones that we need to pull out for playoff positioning, and these types of games have been our achilles heel all season long. I’m tired of losing close games. There just hasn’t been the focus and composure in the fourth quarters like there was in similar situations last year.

by HeathBlizzard on Mar 22, 2010 6:59 AM PDT reply actions  

You may have over-looked

We own the tie breaker with Phoenix, SAS, and Dallas. We are 1-1 against the L*kers and OKC with 2 games left to play; .we are 3-1 against Denver with one game left to play. Therefore we have not been this way all year. We still have a good chance and a good team.

Just look at the whole year with all our adversities and a different starting 5 almost every game, not just one game that we lost in a tight finish. We just beat Washington in a tight finish. You may say they are a rotten team, but the La*kers just barely beat them.

hg

hg

by BBK on Mar 22, 2010 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

um...

we don’t hold the tie breaker with Dallas yet. we are 2-0 against them with 2 more games (both at the RG) and we are 1-2 against Denver with 1 more game at Denver—-which is a back to back. That being said, I wouldn’t mind being in the 8th seed come playoffs. No one would expect the Blazers to win against LA so they have nothing to lose and I think they could give LA a scare.

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Mar 22, 2010 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

My bad

I thought we only played Dallas 3 times this year.

The point I was trying to make is that we have won some great games this year and some close games, so don’t book the whole season on one game that was winnable to the end.

You are right, being eighth in the play-offs would be OK, the main thing is getting there.

We are still looking good at this point, and SAS has another tough game tonight I believe.

hg

hg

by BBK on Mar 22, 2010 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nobody mentioned this game was on ESPN and/or KGW

How many games have we lost in a row on ESPN? I can count five.

I don’t know if it ESPN, KGW or me getting to watch a game.

If I remember right, Pheonix can’t win on TNT.

hg

hg

by BBK on Mar 22, 2010 7:00 AM PDT reply actions  

No more games on ESPN!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!

2 more games on KGW….thankfully both are at home and both are below .500 teams.
I don’t want to jinx it but we are 3-1 on TNT this year.

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Mar 22, 2010 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Suns Can Shove It!!

At the end of the day The Suns will never get close to the NBA Finals / Championship

The Blazers have more Youth and Better players in My Opinion, Sure the suns play a Fast Tempo Game, but that dosent work in the Playoffs when it comes down to it.

The Blazers have Roy and Lamarcus, Greg shud come back better than ever! and they have the Salary Cap to make a BIG signing in the Summer

Marcus Camby 16 Rebounds?

KP please resign Camby Next Season!

by Liam Whittaker on Mar 22, 2010 7:04 AM PDT reply actions  

we might want to rethink sentence structure

KP please resign

might not be the way to put this!

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Three and a half

I disagree with your assesment of LaMarcus’ defense. On one possession he didn’t even put his hands up. He continually got pushed out of the way for rebounds, then when the opposing 4’s put them back up for baskets, he gives us this run down the floor real quick bs as if our team is going to fastbreak somebody on a made basket. It’s a travesty this guy won’t put on 15 pounds for this team, and give us more of an effort on the court.

by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 22, 2010 7:05 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

There was one missed shot where Stoudemire simply stepped around LMA

to get the offensive board and slammed it home. I know this isn’t the place, but that contract they gave to LMA is as big an albatross as this team has. I am starting to think he has no heart, no fire. We all know he’s soft, now I am wondering if he even cares.

by lil'stink on Mar 22, 2010 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

what reason would that be?

the ‘shots weren’t falling’? …..for two games in a row…..

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Mar 22, 2010 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

hm

The blazer run against weak teams exhibited great offense accompanies by poor defense.

Here they played good defense but their offense stunk. Well, they did have some success getting into the paint. However, as important as it is to score in the paint, you do need to also have some success with your outside shots if you are going to win an NBA game.

It is disturbing how low the confidence level appears to be for the young players like Bayless and Martell. When even Nick can’t hit his shots then you know the funk has really spread.

One of the disturbing things with this team is how much they are relying on the old guys. Who have been playing good and steady? Miller, Howard, and Camby. Not a good sign for the future. Something clearly seems to be wrong with the team chemistry. I mean, Blazer young guys clearly have a lot of talent, and they have played well on occasion. But they all seem to be depressed right now.

I would say in yesterday’s game the Blazers looked like a team that will limp into the playoffs and then be mercifully put out of its misery in the first round.

by lsjogren on Mar 22, 2010 8:23 AM PDT reply actions  

its a pretty well known fact

that when a player steps up on the defensive end, their offense will suffer somewhat. Even the great scorers will admit to this. D Wade is famous for talking about how he can do either at an elite level, but not both at the same time, so it’s just a question of pick your poison. Against Phoenix, our best chance is to obviously step it up on D, and hope the offense doesn’t suffer too greatly. It didn’t for 3 quarters, and guys ran out of gas. I dont think we’re at the freak out point yet, but that’s just my take. Phoenix is a good squad right now

by Billy Hoyle on Mar 22, 2010 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

A Shining Moment

Anybody else notice that we ran a pick and roll w/ Andre and LMA, and LMA actually ROLLED TO THE HOOP!?! End result? Nice alley-oop dunk. I hope that becomes a habit.

You pick, then you roll. It ain't so hard. Let's try it out.

by CaptHustle on Mar 22, 2010 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

okay, the defense was good…. I think….
the offense….not so good…..
so basically this team can do 1 of 2 things, play offense and no defense or play defense and no offense…… it’s a quandry….

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Mar 22, 2010 8:47 AM PDT reply actions  

It’s amazing that EVERYONE has a bad shooting game twice in a row….. I’m perplexed.

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.

by jenstcy on Mar 22, 2010 8:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Have we lost Martell?

Dave’s recap does not do justice to the kind of futility that Martell is displaying right now. I know the minutes arent there, but still, there are plenty of guys that dont get big minutes in the league that still manage to be effective. Sad to see really.

Bayless looks garbage too right now. That jumper can look mighy flat and ugly sometimes. And I love me some Juwan Howard, but he was a defensive liability for about 5 minutes in the 4th last night before Nate pulled him…….Bad times

Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson

by Benson on Mar 22, 2010 9:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Martell needs to go, Bayless is still learning, Howard plays too much

Martell will never be happy as a back-up and quite frankly the team can do much better.

Bayless is trying to learn the toughest position in basketball and is probably a year or two from really having a complete game

Howard does some nice things, but yes against a great inside player- a foul machine

by ralphzillo on Mar 22, 2010 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not even talking about the Bayless / PG transition....

Right now, Bayless cant even do what Bayless is good at. Namely: Scoring, Driving……eh, scoring & driving to the lane.

And have we all underestimated the importance of Rudy? Man we needed somebody to hit a 3 last night.

Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson

by Benson on Mar 22, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I dont think most have severely underestimated the importance of Rudy

Last night was just one of those nights where you needed to hit some threes to bust a zone, and nobody was able to do it. Unfortunately, it was probably the deciding factor of the game. Steve Blake would have been a really, really nice option to go against that zone and close the game next to Roy as well. Outside shooting is one of the things the blazers had to sacrifice to get Camby, and it will show from time to time. I’ll take weaker outside shooting over starting Howard any day. With Rudy out, this team can no longer claim 3 point shooting as a strength, they were hardly treading water in that area with him healthy and shooting the ball well. Oh well…

RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP

by Rudiculous on Mar 22, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Martell

defended Amare pretty strongly last night while Batum was out.

He looked lost on offense last night, what Blazer didn’t?

Miller, anyone else?

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Mar 22, 2010 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

One thing that has been disappointing all season long

Is the reluctance to post up Roy and especially Andre. A lot of Dre’s post ups come when he has the ball and clears people out to back in his defender, it rarely looks like a set play. I honestly think he should have posted up Nash at least 10 times last night. They are going to have to double him, and now you have your best passer/decision maker with the ball where he is comfortable and drawing the defense’s attention. It seems like a recipe for success against most teams, especially considering that the blazers currently lack any sort of an offensive post presence. Aldridge does his best to be one, but he cant draw attention like Dre or Roy could, and he certainly cant find people as well if he were to actually draw a double. I dunno, just thinking out loud here…

RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP

by Rudiculous on Mar 22, 2010 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Didn't get to see most of the game originally

But I did catch the replay. I thought we played fine, and I’m satisfied with this game.

Lover of everything Batum.
#88

by RyanRTE on Mar 22, 2010 1:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Looked like three stooges offensive sets out there

Roy passes to LMA , LMA says I don’’t want it you take it and repeat. Then Roy gives up on LMA and throws a FBP to Miller for a three clanker. woop woop woop yadda yadda clang.

This is what happens when a coach is asked about what he thinks about “motion” and his answer is " Rudy is our motion." One guy is the “motion”. I’m going to start calling Rudy " The Motion" in protest.

This game is a matter of motion. The Blazers look like those old films of peach basket basketball where everyone stands in place and shoots set shots.

by meatwad3 on Mar 22, 2010 1:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks

Recent FanPosts

Small
Portland's Team for next year?
Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm