Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Media Row Report: Blazers 82, Lakers 99

The last time the Los Angeles Lakers came to town it was all laughs and smiles for the Portland Trail Blazers; Tonight it was mumbles and slumped shoulders. The Lakers walked into the Rose Garden and exerted their will from start to finish, dominating the Blazers 99-82 and forcing Blazers coach Nate McMillan to waive the white flag and empty his bench with almost 2 minutes to play. A rare sight in the Rose Garden but a merciful one tonight.

Pick just about any way to break this game down and you'll find yourself staring eye-to-eye with a Lakers advantage.

On the boards? Lamar Odom had more rebounds (22) than the 5 Blazers starters combined (20).  He had more offensive rebounds (3) than the Blazers 11 man active roster combined (2).  The Blazers bench, known for its hustle, combined for 0 offensive rebounds in more than 91 combined minutes.

In the paint? 48 points for LA, more than double the Blazers.  Second chance points?  The Blazers had 0.  You might find this surprising but the Lakers had more than that.  Shooting from the field?  The Lakers had 10 more makes and 13 more attempts.  From distance they shot 14% better.  They had more assists, fewer fouls, and more steals.  

In short, the Lakers offense hummed and their defense intimidated, despite the absence of All Star Kobe Bryant and the limited play of center Andrew Bynum, who left the game in the first half due to injury and did not play in the second half.  

As the game wore on, the Lakers dominance tranformed from physical to mental.  Up and down the roster, Blazers flinched in the face of a bigger, stronger, tougher, more experienced and more focused opponent.  Martell Webster seemed to have a nervous hitch in his three point stroke, going 0 for 4 from deep.  Nicolas Batum found himself in isolation on the wing, took one look at Ron Artest and then shuffled the ball off to LaMarcus Aldridge and passively hid in the opposite corner.  An ice cold Steve Blake pushed the ball in mini-transition and uncharacteristically pulled up to clank a three, forcing the issue hopefully as he saw no better alternative. Rudy Fernandez drove the lane in apparent fear, anticipating contact that never came and wildly flailing in hopes of salvaging the play. Jerryd Bayless went to the basket tentatively and indecisively in the first three quarters; His 10 fourth quarter points were far too little, too late.

The Blazers locker room reaction was as uncomplicated as it gets: pure deflation.  A lot of bowed heads. A lot of whispered, forced answers.  A lot of talk about moving on to the next one.  And, not surprisingly, a lot of credit given to the defending-champion Lakers.

 "You look one way, you look another way, [Pau] Gasol was all over the place tonight," Martell Webster said flatly.  "He played a great game. Making his presence felt down in the low post."  

"They played more aggressive than us. They played better," admitted Rudy Fernandez. "They played more aggressive to the basket.  The boards, they dominated."  

Juwan Howard gazed into the distance with a blank look on his face and summed it up tidily. "You've got to give the Lakers credit. They came in with a good gameplan, they performed it to a t and they played very well." 

The Lakers put their foot down convincingly tonight, showing that they were sick of hearing about the Blazers' invincibility in Portland.  There was nothing the Blazers could do to stop a more talented and more physical team looking to prove a point.  They clearly realized that better than anyone.  

Random Game Notes
  • The pre-game gamesmanship was fast and furious as the Blazers held a press conference so that Brandon Roy could address questions about his injured hamstring while at nearly the same moment and just down the hall Kobe Bryant was deciding that he would hold himself out tonight.  
  • Tonight was the first time that it really seemed like Roy has come to terms with the seriousness of his injury.  Over the past few weeks, his treatments and evaluations have been coming so regularly that he likely hasn't had the opportunity to take a step back and put the magnitude of the injury in perspective.  He has been fully focused on the next test and the next treatment and, more than anything else, hoping for good news and the right feeling when he explodes off of it.  But with the decision and announcement that he would miss the next three games and All Star weekend -- something that he wasn't expecting as recently as last week -- the day-to-day, evaluation-to-evaluation aspect of his life stopped, at least for awhile.  What was left? Judging a book by its cover: disappointment and then confusion and then resignation.  
  • While fans and media members might have been disappointed by Kobe Bryant's game time decision not to play (Bayless versus Farmar just doesn't quite have the same ring to it as Roy versus Bryant), the ticket scalpers were surely elated he waited until the last minute.  Once or twice a year, the scalpers have a field day peeling greenbacks out of the pockets of transplanted Lakers fans, many of whom likely sold their plasma and semen to ensure they would have enough money to spend whatever it takes to pay homage to Bryant. 
  • In all seriousness, congratulations to the Lakers fans who finally had their day in the Rose Garden. But bigger congratulations to the lone Blazers fan who held a "Beat LA" sign and spent nearly five minutes jumping up and down like a maniac, flipping off every single Laker fan in sight without regard for human decency or first world mores.  Just hop hop, flip flip, hop hop, flip flip and a few fight-provoking yells, which drew sidelong glances more than anything.  If Nate McMillan could have borrowed some of that energy and enthusiasm for his guards maybe this game plays out differently.
  • Jerryd Bayless said he wasn't sure whether he would practice on Monday but he expects to play through his quad injury on Tuesday night against Oklahoma City.
  • Everyone's favorite sign tonight was the one featuring Pau Gasol in a side-by-side picture with the Geico caveman.  It wasn't particularly original the first time it was shown on the jumbotron and by the third time it was bordering on tacky. 
  • Nate McMillan wasn't quite feeling a question from Andrew R. Tonry of Portland Roundball SocietyCheck his video at the 1:21 mark. When you get frustrated with a question asking how frustrated you are, you kind of prove that you're especially frustrated.  A relatively rare slip from total composure for McMillan.

Nate McMillan's Post Game Comments

Opening remarks

I thought they had match-ups and they came in with a plan to slow this tempo and pound the ball inside with Odom and Gasol and Artest. They did that. They just pounded it inside, forced us to double team. If we didn't do that, they were able to score. I thought their defense was good. They limited us to only one shot, they totally controlled the boards. They are the world champions for a reason. It's a good team. Tonight they executed in the half court, sharing the ball, and if we don't get fast break points or second opportunities it's going to be hard to beat this team.

Offense in second half

Again, good defense. You've got length with Odom and Gasol and Artest. We couldn't get to the paint. And our shots didn't fall. If your shots are not falling, and you're not getting anything easy, no second opportunities, it's going to be a tough night.

Where does this one stack up in terms of frustrating losses this season?

Frustrating losses? That's a question you ask every night. It's a loss. It's a big loss. In the sense that it's a good team. You have to give them credit. Every loss hurts but the Lakers played great basketball tonight. We couldn't get anything easy and when we did get open looks we didn't knock down our shots.

Worried about emotional letdown with no Kobe playing?

I talked to our guys about that before the game. As I told them, we're not playing Kobe, we're playing the Lakers. I felt that that could have been done on purpose. I think Phil challenged them last night and thought they had a letdown without Carmelo playing and sometimes coaches do things like that. Where you challenge your team to see if you can play without a star. We've been in that situation all season long, playing without guys, and guys have stepped up and played. Odom 22 rebounds and 10 points. They were solid.

You're suggesting Phil Jackson might have held Kobe out intentionally?

I mean, I don't know if Kobe got hurt. I don't recall him getting hurt. You look at it as, 'we'll rest you' and challenge your team to play. If this was a different game could he have played?  Maybe?

Artest's 3s at the end of the first half

They were big. They were big. We didn't guard him on that last one but I think the 3 right before that we had a misread. We were on Artest and we rotated to Lamar, that should have been a bluff. You make Lamar shoot the ball. We gave Artest an open look.

Worried about letdown without Roy

We're in a fight. We're in the fight of our lives. We've been in that for a long time. Without our guys and it continues. So we're in the same situation going into the break as we've been pretty much all season long. You gotta try and win games and tonight they were good. And we weren't strong enough. We need to come back on Tuesday against Oklahoma CIty, take it one game at a time, take care of business.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Congrats to the Lakers

Boo to Laker fan behavior. They were behaving extremely badly up in the 300 level.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Feb 7, 2010 12:37 AM PST reply actions  

Let me guess - talking crap and jersey popping, mixed in with obnoxious booze consumption

Free AK1984.

"The two women were of a certain age and were clearly drunk... The only thing that I can get out of this is Why, since all these things happen to me, they couldn’t be two young girls and pretty? :-)" - Rudy Fernandez

by blazeraddict on Feb 7, 2010 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

I was expecting a bit more of a show of frustration from Nate in the video

Was there a particular reason you brought attention to that exchange?

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Feb 7, 2010 1:25 AM PST reply actions  

I think the attention was brought to that ? because Nate said: "That's a ? YOU ask every night"..

sounded like Nate was sick of getting that particular ? from that person..he was even getting frustrated with being asked the ?…that’s how I took it anyway.

by Natsthecat on Feb 7, 2010 5:36 AM PST up reply actions  

That is kind of what I was trying to get at...

If that is “especially frustrated”, then we are getting to, or way past, the point of over analyzing every minutia about what Nate says. If I had watched that without a prompt that Nate had lost his composure, I would not have thought twice about what he said. Of course then I feel some need to point this out because a week from now this “loss of composure” will become part of someone’s diatribe against Nate as if it is fact. It is just a tiresome cycle. I think I am going to get off it.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Feb 7, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

I would NOT have noticed the statement Nate made either. I think Ben asked the interview question?

Guessing here…anyway Nate didn’t seem all that emotional to me. Tired..he seemed tired.

by Natsthecat on Feb 7, 2010 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the Blazers were taken out of their offensive rhythm when Steve was playing point for as long as he did.

That is what seemed to happen. It seemed like after this the Blazers started taking weird shots and missing and once that happened they were hesitating to take shots.
I think Batum was very good on defense and so was Cunningham and Juwan. I think you need to give SOME credit. Rudy got taken out after making a couple of threes at the start…I was at the game and really it did seem like the Blazers timing went off after Blake was at point. No blame on Blake’s play.He did what he does. But the Blazers are better when they are in rhythm and it took awhile to get that back and by then they were behind….then trying to hit jumpers under pressure. That is my perception from watching the game at the Rose Garden. I may be wrong.

by Natsthecat on Feb 7, 2010 5:40 AM PST reply actions  

Disagree...

I was at the game and re-watched it the next day on my DVR. Blaming Blake for our offensive issues is akin to blaming the weather for a bad day after a nuke just went off downtown. We have FAR bigger issues offensively and defensively than Blake, and those problems start quite obviously in the frontcourt. The bottom line is that without Oden & Pryz, our inside game is ridiculously inconsistent and at times laughably bad for a team knocking on the door of the playoffs.

by mjswoosh on Feb 8, 2010 8:08 AM PST up reply actions  

We can't always beat the odds.

If it wasn’t for our outstanding record against the L*kers at the Rose Garden with or without BRoy, with or without all our injured players, this would be a game that we would be asking for miracles and mercy from the BB Gods. You can’t beat the odds night after night with out players and experience. When the time comes that we are good enough, and that time will come, we won’t be asking for a win we will take the win by taking the game.

Any team in the NBA can win a game on a given night, but to ask a under manned team time after time, game after game to do it is asking for the impossible dream every game.

We have successively found ways to win and successively found ways to survive; that was the hope when all our players went down to injury. Regardless of all that we have done odds will catch up with you from time to time.

hg

by BBK on Feb 7, 2010 7:36 AM PST reply actions  

The Blazers are pillowy soft in the middle

and last night they paid for it. Howard has done what he can to man the middle, but he’s 37 and not a true center. Aldridge is tall enough, but doesn’t have the mindset to bang down low. Either Przy or Oden would’ve changed the outcome of this game – no more easy drives to the hoop for the Lakers and no more Lamar freakin’ Odom rebounds. Odom must’ve been on the pixie dust last night because he was as active as I’ve seen him in a long time. Of course, the Blazers made it easy for him by not really crashing the boards.

Does Portland chalk this season up as forgotten and make do with its current players or should they deal some of the bench dudes for a potentially short term rental of a real center? I’m willing to send Webster packing and probably Bayless as well. I don’t think Portland’s answer at PG is currently on the roster. If the Nets are fire-selling Harris, Portland should go get him.

Anyhow, this game played out as you might’ve guessed just by looking at the teams’ records. Portland has played LA tough in the Rose Garden previously, but it wasn’t meant to be last night. As BBK mentioned above, the Lakers consistently have a good team so you know Portland will regress down to the mean sooner or later.

Andrew Bynum doesn’t look right. He was hobbling up and down the court. I think the Lakers might want Turiaf back to help shore up the middle.

by torsoheap on Feb 7, 2010 8:06 AM PST reply actions  

You're right about Bynum

He banged his left kneecap during Wednesday’s game against Charlotte, and wore a sleeve on his left knee for the first times all season in the Friday night game vs Denver and last night’s game vs Portland. He says it’s the same injury (slight dislocation) to that knee as the season-ending injury in January 2008, only it’s much less severe this time.

Sometimes circumstances catch up with tough-luck teams like the Rockets and Blazers. A highly motivated Laker team wasn’t going to lose last night, even without Kobe (who finally realized he needs to rest). The team ran the triangle offense on about 80% of their possessions, a substantially higher percentage than any other game since Kobe fractured his finger in mid-December. Even Farmar and Brown ran the triangle, which is a miracle and something we’ve been clamoring for at FB&G for ages.

by The Dude Abides on Feb 7, 2010 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the Lakers might want Turiaf back to help shore up the middle.

And I want KP to beat Kupchak to the punch and get Ronny in red/black

Outlaw + Mills would get ’er done

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 7, 2010 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t like the idea of trading Bayless. In my mind he’s an untouchable unless something big pops up that we can’t refuse. He has too much potential upside & is a natural at scoring in bunches by penetrating. As a bonus, he is a willing and tough defender who HATES to lose and busts his ass on every play. In sum total, this is more than we can realistically say about any of our other players on this current roster.

Blake & Outlaw are the obvious movable pieces. Their expiring contracts will be attractive to other teams. I like the idea of trading both of them to Chicago for Brad Miller & Kirk Hinrich, a move that would help the Blazers in 2 areas of need.

by mjswoosh on Feb 8, 2010 8:16 AM PST up reply actions  

I like the idea of trading both of them to Chicago for Brad Miller & Kirk Hinrich

You do realize that Mlller and Hinrich’s combined salaries add up to over 21 mil, and that Blake and Outlaw combined contracts are less than half of that amount, don’t you?

http://www.storytellerscontracts.info/resources/09-10salaries.htm

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 8, 2010 8:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Portland was beat by a good veteran team

So even the mathematical law of averages would cancel out the home court advantage the Blazers have had in recent years. But you still play the game and that’s when true reality takes over.
    The Blazers are still in the lower playoff group. (I say this even with the full compliment of players) Until they have proven otherwise, why wouldn’t it be a logical conclusion?
   They are young, but still are missing an inside game (credit on this one to the Lakers’). They have trouble in the transition game (both offense and defense) LA went to the outside shot (because the Blazers DID do a pretty decent job on their inside defense) but then left perimeter defense wide open and uncontested.

   I agree with you (torsoheap) about the team not being complete. Miller is a temporary fill in at point guard and Bayless(though aggressive) lacks most skills you would expect from a point guard. Consistency has to be the key to any player decisions. I would think that players such as Webster, Outlaw, Rudy, and Bayless may be the bubble players.
  I know losing Rudy and maybe Bayless would be unpopular but at some point you have to get an identity to your team so you can move ahead and get to the next level. If your not going to be a fast break team, then players like Bayless, Rudy, Batum, will suffer in the current system anyway. Sadly, this team will have “limited” open court play with Roy and Nate.
    It is my contention, that everyone on this team would benefit from running, including LMA. Of course Roy and Nate are uncomfortable with this. They obviously don’t practice it much because they are pretty raw when they do run. These things become instinctive over time and you make less mistakes. This is why “the running when it’s there” philosophy is just a bunch of words that mean; don’t hit the floor running and thus sets the tone for a half court game plan.
   I don’t see much of a point in making any temporary deals for this season. I see a chance to explore new options and would hope that running the floor would be one of them.
  Nate is frustrated…he’s frustrated by the obvious…he can’t use Roy to continue with his offensive game plan. He has to answer dumb questions from the media and still keep his cool. Maybe he should shed the nice guy stuff and get tough. His passive nature seems to be rubbing off on the team.

by WyEast on Feb 7, 2010 9:40 AM PST reply actions  

It seems to me that we are trying to run

fast breaks and running starts with getting rebounds on missed shots and playing good D.

I think both of those elements were missing last night.

Nate has said he wants a faster tempo. I seen BRoy recieve many passes when running the floor for dunks.

Besides the fast tempo you still need a decent half court game which was missing last night.

hg

by BBK on Feb 7, 2010 10:09 AM PST up reply actions  

yes good defense

is a key element in starting the break. I didn’t mention it, this time, because i think i say the “D” word almost every other comment I make. They made no attempt to run last night. Maybe LA’s transition defense was too good, but it looked too obvious last night they weren’t that interested in pushing the ball.
  I’m saying it should have been in their game plan. (Noting the older Lakers were on back to back) Especially in the second half when LA was intent on shutting down anything less than 12 feet in and relying on the law of averages on the outside shooting. (they effectively shut down the perimeter and LMA as well. ) Our only hope was to run, run some more and then have a better chance with setting up a more free flowing offensive set (half court set included) LA was just able to “set up” on defense just about every time down the floor.

by WyEast on Feb 7, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

My disagreement to your statement

Saying that Nate and BRoy would be uncomfortable with running. They have that on the agenda all the time, but don’t always execute. Your comment about not running last night and BRoy wasn’t in the game. They ran against SAS, so there is some discrepancy going on.

My take is that running and fast breaks takes more teamwork and spacing then a half court set. Or maybe you have to learn to walk together before you can run together.

I am all for the running and I am all for the execution of a half court set when the running is inhibited. My only disagreement is saying that BRoy and Nate is not comfortable with running.

hg

by BBK on Feb 7, 2010 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Both teams played hard.....

Small ball does not win championships.....

Go Blazers !!

by FrenchieFan on Feb 7, 2010 10:08 AM PST reply actions  

I think the Blazers lost their rhythm and then their nerves set in. They are young. Juwann and Miller

were composed. Dante seemed composed and focused. Martell…maybe the youngsters all went out and partied the night before…who knows!

by Natsthecat on Feb 7, 2010 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

....
Nate McMillan wasn’t quite feeling a question from Andrew R. Tonry of Portland Roundball Society. Check his video at the 1:21 mark. When you get frustrated with a question asking how frustrated you are, you kind of prove that you’re especially frustrated. A relatively rare slip from total composure for McMillan.

Andrew: You’re doing it wrong.

-Sophia

The Princess of Blazersedge

It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Feb 7, 2010 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

Please Remove Rudy From Your Trade Fantasies

It would be like paying Sergio to go to Sacramento, a plain give away. His salary is so low we could never get equal value.

by Original Blazer Fan on Feb 7, 2010 10:14 AM PST reply actions  

Anyone playing at the end of the game seemed to have a better box score +/- anyways.

Martell was horrible last night. Was at the RG and though I like Martell as a person he was god awful last night. HORRIBLE. HORRIBLE….

by Natsthecat on Feb 7, 2010 2:34 PM PST up reply actions  

all we ask for is a little consistency from Webster

and that’s the hardest thing for Martell to deliver. I don’t think it’s about "looking over his shoulder’ at Batum, some guys just have “it” and some guys never seem to find it

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 7, 2010 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

There was nothing to like about that game

I wished I wasn’t watching it live so I could just fast forward it.

I kind of looked at it like the Colts losing a game just so they didn’t have to deal with the 18-0 monkey. Now the Blazers can kick in the Lakers teeth in the playoffs.

by tominhawaii on Feb 7, 2010 2:45 PM PST reply actions  

I take the other stance

Now that L*A has “broken through” at Portland, they’re the last team I want to see the Blazers face in round 1. Nate and the boys should do everything they can to finish 7th in the west and let “someone else” (like Memphis or OKC) match up with the L*kers

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 7, 2010 6:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed...absolutely TERRIBLE game...embarrassing in fact...

First of all, this was easily one of the worst overall efforts I’ve seen from the Blazers this year. It was pathetic on multiple levels. Aside from a 1st quarter effort by Howard & an angry 4th quarter scoring flurry by Bayless, no one else even showed up for this game.

From a “product” perspective, it was totally wasted money. BRoy didn’t play (mostly expected). Kobe didn’t play (unexpected). He waited til a last minute press conference to let that out. Scalpers collectively thanked Kobe for that fact. If I’d have known he wasn’t playing, I might have sold both my $180 tickets outside the Rose Garden. Roy vs. Kobe is worth the $360 price tag. Bayless vs. Farmar/Brown is NOT. You could hear a collective sigh of frustration from Blazer fans. I love to hate Kobe. Watching the Lakers without him just wasn’t the same.

If the Blazers as a team had shown up at all, then it would have made up for this lack of a marquee matchup. As a loyal fan, that is our hope every night. Unfortunately, the lack of effort/hustle/defensive intensity from players like LaMarcus Aldridge is wearing thin & adds to an already long list of problems this team has. With these types of injuries we can’t afford players with his talent to be loafing up and down the court and disappearing in the 3rd/4th quarters.

In fact, I’ll say it now: it’s time to look around for opportunities to trade LA for equal talent. Bosh and Stoudamire are the obvious choices and both are being shopped hard by their respective teams.

by mjswoosh on Feb 8, 2010 8:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Did Anyone

See the black dude at halftime pouring bear on his head and shaking his ass? Someone make that a gif!!!

by ODEN on a stick on Feb 8, 2010 2:15 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm