Game 61 Recap: Blazers 111, Bulls 115 (OT)
Long Story Short: In a thrilling game featuring a little bit of everything--star performances, running, passing, offensive rebounding, improbable shots, and near misses--the Blazers ride Chicago turnovers and rebounding woes, plus the hot hand of LaMarcus Aldridge, until the well runs dry and they fall in overtime.
The Game
This game started in fine fashion for the Bulls. Portland's defensive philosophy was simple: collapse down on Derrick Rose, preventing him from scoring in the lane, daring anyone else to produce. Chicago obliged the Blazers by letting their non-Rose players shoot away. In the first quarter they connected from mid-range just fine to the tune of 31 points. Portland, meanwhile, attacked with the pass, spreading the ball around during the early part of the quarter with mixed results. They were kept alive by a couple of foul-drawing drives and LaMarcus Aldridge developing rhythm late but only managed 22 points. As predicted, most of their shots were contested. They had to find a way to beat the defense.
In the middle two periods the Bulls showed them the way...or rather they gift-wrapped it. Portland started getting busy on defense, trapping, diving, waving arms in the passing lane, trying to force turnovers. The Bulls began coughing up the ball like grandma's rancid phlegm. Turnover after turnover allowed the Blazers to run out against zero or one defender rather than five. All of a sudden Portland was pushing 30 points per quarter as well. The open court game suited Jerryd Bayless just fine. (There are few prettier sights on the floor right now than Bayless on the way to the cup. You know that's some good stuff.) Aldridge also ran. When they weren't on the move Portland rode LMA some more plus they garnered a few offensive rebounds and free throws. All of these extra points pushed them over the Bulls in the second period. Chicago continued to allow Portland to bait them into non-Rose shots in that quarter, when they got a shot at all that is. The Blazers were within 1 at the half.
The third period featured more Chicago mistakes, more Blazer run-outs, more free throws, more rebounds, and more torrid LaMarcus Aldridge scoring on Portland's side. The Blazers ran the pick and pop for LMA so much they wore a groove in the floor. But it worked. It looked like they could run away with the momentum. Except the Bulls decided enough was enough on the other end of the court and, when they could get a shot, they went with Rose. This continued throughout the entire half. To the astonishment of absolutely nobody who has watched the Blazers over the last decade, Portland was unable to come up with a defensive solution to a talented, motivated, streaking guard. When Portland switched on screens Rose buried the jumper on the slower defender. Ditto when they went under the screen. When Chicago didn't bother with the pick Rose simply took whatever defender was handy off the dribble. The third period ended in a 28-all tie and Portland remained down by 1.
Chicago took care of the ball and the boards in the fourth period which made Portland work for their shots. The LaMarcus geyser went dry but Miller and Roy opened up smaller fountains and kept the scoring going, if not at its earlier pace. Unable to run Portland settled for halfcourt jumpers but also, in a streak of fortunate timing, hit them. Rose entered the period still on fire but the Blazers, now realizing their fate should he continue to burn, called for a five-alarm response every time he touched it. They threw any available defender at him. Even he had trouble finding the hoop or a shot after that but the secondary cost was a lack of attention on Chicago's other star, Luol Deng. Still recovering from injury, Deng looked a little slow for most of the game. That didn't stop him from hitting the open jumpers that Rose's new defenders left him. And so the period went, back and forth, different players from each team stepping up and draining shots, mostly from the perimeter. The Blazers kept rotating defenders on Rose late, sending in Bayless, Fernandez, and Batum to bother him. That didn't stop him from making a layup with 2:00 left to put Chicago up 3. Roy converted a treacherous layup, the Bulls hit a free throw, then Roy hit a short jumper with 16 seconds left to tie the game at 103. The Bulls had the last possession and you'll never guess who got it. Fortunately Portland finally found a guy who could shadow and bother D-Rose, at least for one play. LaMarcus Aldridge switched off on him, followed him down the lane, and forced him to put up the winning layup a shade high. It bounced around the cylinder and rolled off. We were off to overtime.
The overtime started off with Luol Deng roasting Portland's coffee beans even more. Joakim Noah also got perky on defense and cleaning the glass. He brought an energy and enthusiasm to the non-scoring parts of the game that neither team had yet mustered. Portland, meanwhile, followed up four points by Roy with a bevy of improbable jump shots, leading the educated observer to go, "AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!" Chicago opened up a 5-point lead. Then Chicago started turning over the ball again and Portland scored twice, once on an Aldridge dunk and once on an Aldridge tip off of a Roy missed free throw. All of a sudden it's a 1-point game with 21 seconds left. The Blazers foul Deng and he hits only 1. Blazers down 2 with 20 seconds left. Brandon Roy gets the ball, dribbles out by the three-point arc, diagonal to the right, creates some separation, and lofts the game-winner with a little over 4 seconds left. Except the ball clangs off and rebounds to Flip Murray. Rudy Fernandez streaks by but can't foul Flip, instead waving futilely at the ball in Flip's hands. Luol Deng streaks out followed belatedly by Brandon Roy. Flip flips Deng the ball, Roy's pursuit falls short, Deng lays it in, and that's the ballgame. 115-111 Bulls.
The Blazers played plenty well enough to win this game. They got 50 points in the paint to Chicago's 38, many of those coming off of breaks caused by Chicago's 21 turnovers for 26 Portland points. Portland shot 51.2% as well. They kept the free throws pretty even and didn't fall in love with the three. But Portland lost because Rose and Deng led the Bulls to 57.5% shooting and Noah helped them dominate the boards after their early work had been slipshod. Without Chicago's mistakes the Blazers couldn't find enough ways to foil the defense and so they lost...barely.
Individual Observations
What a heck of an offensive night for LaMarcus Aldridge. The guy is feeling it right now. He collected 32 points on 15-23 shooting. The Bulls couldn't stop the jumper, face-up or turn-around. He added 7 boards and played a little bit of good help defense.
Roy shot 8-19 for 23 points with 6 assists. He couldn't handle the Bulls on the defensive end, often getting matched up against Deng, sometimes against Rose. He did get to the foul line himself 8 times, making 6 but missing two critical ones in a row late. The latter one was tipped by Aldridge so the Blazers got the 2 anyway.
Andre Miller played 42 minutes, hit some nice jumpers, missed a couple other ghastly ones late, posted up, drove the lane a little, dished 7 assists, got burned on defense by Rose just like everybody else, and finished with 14 points.
Marcus Camby gave Portland a nice 42 minutes as well with 11 rebounds, 3 blocks, 3 assists, 3 steals, and 9 points. In fact other than his 6 defensive rebounds and 6 shot attempts he utterly refused to have any stat in his line that wasn't a prime number. Unfortunately his teammates still aren't used to rotating over to help him with his initial man when he tries for an opportunity play. Hopefully they'll learn that it's not polite to leave him exposed when he's helping others.
Nicolas Batum started and did alright with 8 points and 2 rebounds in 24 minutes. He helped seal the middle against Rose early but couldn't contain him late.
Despite registered only 3 shots, 3 points, a rebound, and a steal in 21 minutes I though Rudy did fairly well in this game, particularly early on. Like Roy, he took a few turns watching Deng on the defensive end and didn't get entirely overmatched. He also set up the offense a little and looked credible. It was like he was stretching his wings at other positions. He wasn't a decisive factor but he didn't screw up.
Jerryd Bayless played 22 minutes and hit 5-8 shots, many of them layups, also drawing 6 foul shots and hitting 5 for a total of 15 points. Putting a turnover and open floor in front of Jerryd is like putting a corn dog and Mountain Dew can in front of a blogger.
Juwan Howard had a rough 14 minutes, hitting only 1-4 and turning the ball over twice. Martell Webster didn't have a chance to have a rough anything, collecting 2 fouls in 5 minutes, the price of Fernandez and Bayless playing. Dante Cunningham scored 3 in 5 minutes.
As we said pre-game, this loss is certainly the most acceptable potential defeat on the trip. The opponent was good, the black mark was non-conference. As long as Portland wins tomorrow they're set up nicely for an important game in Memphis.
Check out the Rose festival over at BlogaBull.
See thy Jersey Contest scores for the evening hither and entereth the morrow's game yon.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
109 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't understand the Blazers love affair with Rudy
if this is how they are going to use him. He is currently 5th in the perimeter rotation behind Miller, Roy, Batum, and Bayless. He only shot the ball 3 times despite being matched up with Rose who was standing about 4 ft away from him. The Blazers are better off trading Rudy while they can still get value. That spaniard is about to go into the tank.
by Basketball Smurf on Feb 26, 2010 9:07 PM PST reply actions
He had a good game vs the Raptors
He never has two good games in a row.
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 26, 2010 10:14 PM PST up reply actions
Rudy has been ahead of Bayless in the rotation since Blake was traded...
So he is really the 3rd guard behind Roy and Miller in Nates eyes at this point, depending on match ups of course.
I still think Rudy brings a lot more to the floor than just being a shooter, although it is very frustrating to watch him struggle at something that should be his biggest strength…
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
Big loss.
We need to pull these close ones out if we want to catch OKC and PHX.
This game hurt
But right now I am so focused on the jersey contest…I am so close…this could be my one chance to get a blazers jersey…just don’t bomb the next game.
"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez
You could actually buy one if it doesn't work out
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
+92
Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’
by 92wastheyear on Feb 27, 2010 9:54 AM PST up reply actions
With 27 losses, the Blazers are now in serious danger of falling out of the playoffs
We can’t get good shots late in games, which is kind of ironic with a slowed down pace and the lanes clogged. The offensive sets continue to be atrocious. And BRoy is not the BRoy of 2009 who can will the team to wins on his own.
The lack of motion in our offense reminds me of how I used to play in grade school.
It is so incredibly predictable and makes guarding/cheating off our other guys so incredibly easy cause their never going to move.
Why can’t McMillan incorporate an offense above a 5th grade Boys & Girls Club level?
I didn't mean to turn you on
so predictable that it works just fine when we win, but apparently is so terrible when we lose. And yet, we win more than we lose. But that doesn’t matter immediately following a loss, because that’s why we lost. Doesn’t matter that D Rose was freakin NOVA…kid is a stud. Give him some credit
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 11:02 PM PST up reply actions
This game had all the things people have been critical of.
Do you think LMA is soft? In the last few minutes of the 4th and OT he got pushed around by Noah. Do you think the team doesn’t give him the ball? Midway through the third they stopped going to him when he was on fire. Don’t like Miller taking 3s? It looked like they drew up a play to get him one towards the end. Think Nate can’t juggle all our role players? In the last few minutes Rex, Rudy, and Batum were put in and out Dunleavy style. Think the offense just does isos and has no motion? We had four guys standing around watching most of the 4th. Think Dre and Roy can’t play together? They seemed to take turns doing isos instead of playing off each other. Same with Rex when all 3 were together. I could keep going (Rudy’s travel shows we need Blake) but they played poorly all around and it looked like all their weaknesses showed up tonight.
"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk
by terryisntbald on Feb 27, 2010 12:10 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Yeah, I noticed
LMA never comes up big late for us. That’s the Bedge truth. Well, except for a big jumper with three minutes left and a big tip off a missed free throw late in overtime. So maybe another Bedge truth isn’t so true.
Good grief, we just lost on the road to a team that has been on fire. We’re still trying to incorporate a new center. Our superstar still isn’t back to 100%. And we took them to overtime.
Great game for us? Obviously not. But hardly a disaster.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
+92,000
Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’
by 92wastheyear on Feb 27, 2010 9:55 AM PST up reply actions
To how many significant digits is that accurate?
I’m keeping score, and wanted to know if I just got precisely 92,000.0 points, or if you are rounding, and it’s actually just somewhere between, say, 91,500 and 92,499.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
I have an actute control over my agreement
it is literally +92,000.0000000000000 +\- .0000000000000000000000012457
Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’
by 92wastheyear on Feb 27, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Portland weakness is not having Offense
Offense against a team that plays any D. We have just had to many line-ups with all the injuries.
hg
Serious danger?
Really? You do realize we’re two games ahead of the nearest challenger, and have a much easier remaining schedule than the teams behind us?
This team is not playing like a high seed or a contender to win a series, but they’ll make the playoffs. The “chasing” pack has been chasing backwards, while we’re kind of treading water.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
We are in 8th place. The two teams behind us have 28 losses, we have 27. Houston is adding Kevin Martin into the rotation, New Orleans will soon add a certain Chris Paul. Memphis has 29 losses, making it a kind of must-win game. Yet people still fantasize about catching Utah. It’s not time to panic, but it’s time to issue a “yellow alert”.
We certainly won't catch Utah
unless they collapse.
We have 11 games remaining against winning teams (4 home, 7 away) and 10 against losing teams (5 and 5). We should presumably win at least 4 of the former and at least 8 of the latter, which would give us 46 wins. I expect to win more than that, but we should be able to get 46, anyway. There are far too many winnable games on the schedule to expect any less than that.
Wildcard: San Antonio has a brutal remaining schedule, and has been quite poor against winning teams, especially on the road. They have 12 remaining road games against winning teams, and aren’t healthy. Even if one of the teams below us does catch fire and pass us, we have an excellent chance of finishing ahead of the Spurs.
Memphis is toast. They have 17 against winning teams (7 home, 10 away) and 7 against losing teams (4 home, 3 away). They’ll do very well indeed if they get 8 of the former and 6 of the latter, which would take them to 45. I’ll be very surprised if they do that well, but even so they’ll fall short. Look for them to get 40-43 wins. For us to only get 43, we’d have to go 11-12 the rest of the way, which isn’t happening with our schedule unless we have more injuries.
New Orleans is probably done. They have 16 left against winning teams (8 home, 8 away) and 7 against losing teams (4 and 3). They are going to lose another on Sunday, at Dallas, in all probability. Even with CP3, they aren’t exactly a dominant team — just over .500. They’ll do very well to get 9 wins against the winning teams and 6 against the losing teams, which would take them to 46. 46 wins is optimistic for them and pessimistic for us. Over the next six days, they play at Dallas, home and away against the Spurs, and host Memphis. If they pull off two wins, it will keep them hoping.
Houston is the only real threat, IMO. They are only one game over .500, and play at Utah tonight. Assuming we win as we should, they will probably be two games behind us in the loss column and six in the win column. That seems like a mountain to climb, but their schedule is less threatening than the other two — next week they host Toronto and Sacramento, then play at Minnesota and Detroit. They should be favored in all four games, but will they actually win them all? If they do, they’ll climb back into contention.
As of today, Houston has 14 games left against winning teams (7 home, 7 away) and 11 against losing teams (5 home, 6 away). It would be a very good performance to win 8 of the former and 9 of the latter, which would give them 17 more wins — again, an optimistic win total for Houston is 46.
Three teams behind us, it would take an optimist to predict even 46 wins for any of them, and a severe pessimist to predict we’ll fall below 46. Barring yet another killer injury, this is a playoff team.
Yes, Houston has added Kevin Martin, and New Orleans will add Chris Paul in 1-3 weeks, but we’ve added Brandon Roy and Marcus Camby recently, while Houston lost Carl Landry.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
Rudy did fairly well in this game…he wasn’t a decisive factor but he didn’t screw up.
I thought the play with 45 seconds to go in regulation where Roy kicked the ball to Rudy in the right corner and Fernandez dribbled in, got turned aound and traveled was extremely costly. Just catch and shoot it like Blake or Travis used to do, #5—that’s why you’re in the game!
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Why not?
I thought it was absolutely the right play. He just wasn’t prepared to shoot it. Make or miss, Blake would have taken that shot.
In general it feels like the team is passing up shots lately. Roy had several open threes and waited til his man closed. Martell looks lost again. The only guy who seems to be shooting with confidence is Miller, and he probably shouldn’t.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
he was covered
simplicity rules…it would have been a bad shot, and he was trying for something better…except he had nowhere to go with the ball…
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 27, 2010 1:20 AM PST up reply actions
even a bad shot has a chance of a rebound
a travel is an automatic change of possession
Rudy was open enough, or Roy wouldn’t have passed him the ball. We all know the drill, we’ve seen Blake, Outlaw, etc shoot that corner three enough times at the end of games. Rudy wasn’t prepared, his feet weren’t set, whatever. I’m sure he feels bad about it.
My objection was to the all-positive spin re: Rudy in Dave’s commentary.
Even though Rudy may have done some nice peripheral things earlier in the game, I’m sure that’s not what he was focused on, post game. The pendulum of “good game, bad game” continues to swing for Rudy, and no, he’s not the only one. But if he wants a bigger role in the Blazer’s present and future offense, he’s got to be more consistent. Especially now that Steve/Travis are gone and the team is in a dogfight for playoff positioning
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
When he first received the pass he had a window to shoot.
His hesitation allowed his man to close out, actually two men closed out, and he was stuck. If he’s ready to shoot as soon as he receives it, he’s good. He didn’t, and turned it over.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
umm no
That was my biggest problem with Blake – not taking the shot that he is good at, instead traveling or dribbling then fading
2/21/2010 - Blazers let a mid-3rd quarter 25 point lead turn into an overtime loss.
No more Nate
by collectiveshane on Feb 27, 2010 10:36 AM PST up reply actions
then he shouldn't be out on the floor in that situation
Batum spotted up and made that same shot witout hesitation, earlier in the game
Rudy got happy feet—and he’s supposed to be the “big game experienced” Euro star?
Don’t be a Rudy apologist Dave, we all saw the game
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Geez dude
Dave is hardly a Rudy apologist, I have gotten on him about not giving Rudy enough credit in the past. He is not any players apologist, he does a really good job calling them as he sees them.
I don’t think it was a smart pass either, mostly because he was deep in the corner with three players right around him(Camby, Hinrich, Gibson). That is why the trap that forced Rudy to travel was so easily set. With that said, Rudy should have shot the ball, which is easy to say from my keyboard. He had been on the bench for a long time, and doesnt have much confidence in his shot as of late. Should it have been Batum? I dunno, Rudy has hit a lot of big 3’s late in games for this team in his short time here. I also doubt the ball was designed to go to him, it was a bad play, and one that Rudy made worse by traveling. But, was it really any worse than Miller jacking up that 3 in OT, or Bayless coming down and taking a fall away jumper off the dribble from the elbow without attempting to run the offense? I wasnt too fond of that last Roy 3 either, when he had so easily gotten to rim to send it to OT. Ish happens, lots of players made dumb plays, no point in singling Rudy out…
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
Dave said that Rudy "didn't screw up"
and I didn’t notice him making similar comments about Miller, Bayless, Roy, etc
(I call ‘em like I see ’em, as well…and I couldn’t let that softball slip past)
Following the trade, the Blazers have 3 floor spreaders: Rudy, Webster and Batum. When Nate puts them into the game (for offense, late) their job is to park in the corner and be ready to catch and shoot the trey. Either Rudy wasn’t ready to do this, or he had a better idea of what he should do with the ball when he caught it, and that moment of (in)decision may have cost his team the ballgame. If that’s not a case of “he screwed up” then you and Dave are holding professional players to lower standards than I am
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
You may call em like you see me
but you lack perspective on this.
Dave didn’t say Rudy played a perfect mistake-free game. No one ever does. But if the game wasn’t coming to him, he wasn’t trying to force stuff and make stupid passes, etc. Rudy played under control and within the flow of the team, and did pretty well.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
Why not throw it to him?
I didn’t go back and watch, but I remember him being open enough. Instead of shooting, he pulled his new move of faking and waiting for the defense to close on him. Then he panicked in the trap and shuffled his feet.
I was actually furious when Rudy was put in the game at that point. Then the play happened. I know ever guy makes mistakes, but I thought this was a big one. I also thought it was typical of his recent play. If Rudy really thinks he’s been getting the short end on minutes, I think he needs to look at film of his play since he got back from the surgery. These days, he’s getting by almost exclusively on his good looks.
Still on the Rex bandwagon.
by dan_the_man on Feb 27, 2010 1:48 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Because you have
a guy about six inches from the sideline, which acts as a big, old turnover-causing defender receiving a pass from about 10 feet away on a direct vertical line with a defender already charging him and another easily able to drop down because of said pass. Rudy had nowhere to go. That shot would have been enormously difficult to hit unless he was wide open and had time to set up.
—Dave
Well, shoot. I forgot to dvr this game
So I can’t go back and look at it. I thought he had time to get off a decent shot. Until I get a chance to see it, I suppose I’ll take your word for it that he didn’t have a shot.
Still on the Rex bandwagon.
by dan_the_man on Feb 27, 2010 11:44 AM PST up reply actions
I haven't watched it again
so all I can give you is my impression as I saw it live, which was that Rudy was in trouble before the ball ever touched his hands there. It felt like Brandon getting stuck and bailing out, which is fine but you can’t bail out to the corner guy unless you have penetrated first.
I suppose it’s possible that Rudy had some window but it was an odd situation, an odd pass, and if he was surprised at all by it (which I was as I was watching) that window was all but closed, considering the time it would have taken him to receive the ball, assess, and then go through the shooting motion.
—Dave
It seemed to me he could have gotten it off
but it would have been in traffic
Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’
by 92wastheyear on Feb 28, 2010 8:25 PM PST up reply actions
I left my brain in my other pants...
There was a replay of the game, so I set the dvr to record it. Yesterday, before the game, I went through and cleaned out the dvr list, because I only have space for about 4 games. As I was going through, deleting games, and I came across the Chicago game, I thought to myself, “Ooh, tough loss. I don’t need to see that again.” About 10 minutes later, I remembered why I had recorded it. Oops.
Still on the Rex bandwagon.
Someone has to fill the missing role,
as another scoring option late in games. The 10 points in 19 minutes that Travis gave the Clips last night is missing, even if his defense isn’t the greatest. :(
Til the wheels fall off.... Marcus Camby
Go Blazers !!
by FrenchieFan on Feb 27, 2010 11:43 AM PST up reply actions
Luck, unclutchness, or?
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
Our style of play in close games
I know! A clear out for Roy! What? That didn’t work? Okay…how’s about…a pick and roll with Roy and Aldridge! No? Hmmm…I KNOW! A clear out for Roy!…
etc.
Our style of play hardly ggenerates easy shot oppurtunities and by the time it gets to over time Roy is hardly in the shape to be going iso, iso, iso.
Silver linings. Silver linings. Silver linings.
Just like in the Utah debacle, LA never gets plays called for him down the stretch or in OT..
Just hand it to Brandon and let him try to score every time. I usually have no problem with this, but Brandon is operating at around 60% capacity in my opinion.
LA has been playing awesome ball, but once again we call no plays for him in the fourth quarter. He’s stuck taking bail out long jumpers off the pick and roll when Brandon gets stymied and the shot clock is winding down.
At some point maybe the head coach will realize that he has another very good player on the team. One that is playing at 100% capacity and at his highest level all season. We don’t need to put it all on an injured Brandon every night
what makes you so sure
that plays aren’t being called for him…or that its just him not getting into position on the post. I was wondering the same thing you probably were down the stretch, “Where the hell is LA on offense?” So I watched a couple plays and he would come down and set up at 18 ft and then set a pick for Miller or Roy and then just sort of drift or hang out at 18 feet. It was nothing like what you see from him early in the game.
Now, it could be the play…but considering our sets “are so predictable and boring” I have to assume that it’s the player freelancing a bit and not the play itself…but I really don’t know either, since I’m not in the huddle
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 11:06 PM PST up reply actions
Tonight it was both
in the 3rd quarter he was scoring at will, then they posted up Dre and Roy on the next two possessions. After that they went into jumper mode and a little while later Aldridge went out. When he came back in they still weren’t looking for him, but he also stopped trying to go inside. Especially in the last few minutes when Noah bullied him out of the post. We always hear about how if you don’t keep feeding big guys the ball they get discouraged and usually that applies to centers, but when LMA has games like this when he’s attacking inside and they stop going to him after a few possessions he stops trying to get inside. Many times this season when he’s caught the ball in the post in the final few minutes he doesn’t try to make a move and then passes, so when that happens it’s his fault. The team needs to work on getting him the ball and he needs to fix whatever mental block he has. My armchair psychology believes it’s overthinking, but only he knows.
"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk
by terryisntbald on Feb 27, 2010 12:04 AM PST up reply actions
Lackadaisical play in the first half ...
Score was close at halftime, but I thought we played like we were asleep for the first quarter and a half. Not the intensity level that I hoped for. Sometimes you can just sense when a team isn’t playing to win. I got that sense tonight. I wasn’t surprised to see Chicago come back, even after we built a 3rd quarter lead.
I continue to be unimpressed with LMA’s defense. I feel like for all his scoring, he’s hurting the team more than helping. I think it’s the closeouts in particular that bother me. Maybe he’s concerned with getting beaten on the dribble, but that’s where he must depend on his teammates. If we’re going to switch picks, he’s got to close out and contest. Otherwise players will continue to shoot over the top and make shots consistently.
And can someone explain to me LMA’s defense on inbounds plays? Twice in the first half-once by Gibson and once by Warrick—LMA stood outside his man at the elbow with his back turned to the inbounder so he had to turn his head. Both times his man smartly slipped to the hoop for an easy bucket. Fool LMA once shame on you, fool LMA twice shame on LMA. The frustrating part is he didn’t look too concerned that he just got beat by two players who simply shouldn’t beat him. I think I could handle weak D if he just looked like he cared a little more.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Oh ...
And anybody still want Hinrich? I sure do. I like what Andre brings to the game, but if we’re going to play offense the way we do, we need a guard who can hit the kick out three when Brandon’s on the floor. I still think Hinrich’s the perfect fit, and coincidentally could be had for a straight up trade in the offseason, which could appeal to Chicago since they’re about to blow their wad on someone and probably want to save some money if they can.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
back when KP still had RLEC
My proposal was RLEC+Outlaw+Sergio for Hinrich+Deng
Watching Kirk and Luol doing their thing tonight took me back 13 months to that deadline deal-that-wasn’t…as it turns out, I wasn’t offering anything that KP wasn’t eventually willing to part with
I’m not unhappy with Miller and Camby, and I think Batum will become a better starting SF than Deng. But I suspect Portland’s roster would be further down the road towards serious contention today if that deal had been made. Perhaps the Bulls would’ve said no, but at the time Hinrich was coming off wrist surgery and the cap savings for Chicago (looking towards this coming offseason) would’ve been substantial. Oh well, that’s the last time I’ll bring it up, at least until the next time Portland gets knocked off by da Bulls
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I dont know
I thought LA had a good solid game didnt really notice too many lapses by him. I might have missed it. I thought Rudy had a below par game for him. 3 points? I thought it was a very bad game for him. I just wish we had one more milleresque player at point. The offense was really nasty without him in there.
I just wish we had one more milleresque player at point. The offense was really nasty without him in there.
Mllleresque players aren’t easy to come by. But I agree that adding a veteran PG would be a good idea, before Monday’s deadline. If Quick has got KP figured out (which is dubious at best) the Blazers are more interested in adding another big man to fill the 15th spot
If it was up to me, I’d waive Patty Mills and fill the 14th-15th sports with a veteran PG and an extra big man…but I’m not Paul Allen so there’s point in fantasizing
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Unaware of any worthwhile veteran point guards out there.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Wendell Maxey mentioned a few the other day
and there may have been others who have been waived since that article
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
.
<< Portland, meanwhile, followed up four points by Roy with a bevy of improbable jump shots, leading the educated observer to go, “AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!” >>
Indeed. How many games do we have to loose that we lead by double digits by playing team basketball only to see the cushion slip away by choosing to go one against five?
Roy is our best player and I get that. Get the ball into his hands blah blah blah.
The problem is that the rest of humanity gets it too. However one against five is not the best shot to be had on the floor. Rose figured that out by passing to Noah and Noah passing to the man closest to the basket. Meanwhile Nate and Roy continue to jam their thumbs up each others backsides trying to pull out a plumb.
I’m sick of watching this arrogant stupidity.
Me two! Stupid Nate and his predictable offense.
Why do we have to go to Roy ISOs when its not working? And I hate that Roy took every shot down the stretch, we have 4 OTHER guys out there two you know! Aldridge was on fire tonight but as usual he does not get the ball in the fourth quarter, even Roy rather pass to Camby for an 18fter than LMA. Dumb B! Its not like Roy was playing any defense either, leaving Deng all alone for easy jumpers.
We lost it on the defensive end and letting the Bulls shot almost 60% from the field. With no one helping Camby protect the paint, we will continue to allow well over 50% from our opponents.
I listened to the whole game on the radio
which made me feel like we did all we could tonight….until I saw the highlights! Aside from the coaching mishaps, which seemed like many(failing to call a timeout late, waiting too long to sub in Bayless for Rudy, etc.),I feel like the Roy between the legs last three attempt seemed desperate and a result of fatigue and panic. The only thing we can do is to leave this loss in the dust and look forward to the last two games of the road trip. There’s no reason we should lose tomorrow night. Memphis is on a skid but still hold a decent home record. Let’s close this out right with a 4-1!
Xcept that I don't think that we can beat Memphis!
They own us this year and with the way that Nate has the team playing defense and the team’s offense in the 4th quarter, forget about it!
Play Juwan less. Give more minutes to Camby/LMA/Dante.
Seriously. We have some guys back for depth, time to sit Juwan, despite all his veteran savvy we have guys who are just plain better overall.
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
Dante was getting schooled in this game
In general, I agree, but the Inferno was getting smoked, and needed to sit.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
He only played 5 minutes
because Nate decided to go 3 guards for half the game.
I wouldn’t have minded seeing Webster take some of Juwan’s minutes, though. I wonder how many times Howard has to get called for moving or holding on screens before Blazer fans fall out of love with him. He did a great job for us when we didn’t have a center, but now we have one, and when it comes to forward minutes, I don’t think Juwan is the man. He should back up Camby, but not LMA.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
I wonder if WEbster is feeling ok
Maybe a touch of the cold Batum had????
by Hermistonmelons on Feb 27, 2010 8:31 AM PST up reply actions
I still think Dante should be the 3rd big off the bench, not Juwan...
Juwan can get some spot minutes at center against the big front lines. Against a team like the bulls, I would rather see LA slide over to center when Camby is out and put Dante at the pf. Although, Al Jefferson and Kevin Love will make that tough to do tonight, when they are playing together.
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
I think that Nate already screwed up when he dumped
Webster from starter to a end of the bench player. It does not seem to matter that Rudy can’t put 2 good games together, Webster is still getting only 5 minutes a game. What in hell did Martell do? Did he make a move on Nate’s significant other? Its not like Batum is playing a lot better as a starter, the team defense still sucks so if its not the personal that sucks then its the coaches.
His point totals in the last 15 games
28, 21, 20, 14, 10, 10, 6, 4, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 0, 0 That’s 2 really good games, 3 games you want to see on a consistent basis, and 10 games where he either shot the ball horribly or just didnt do anything at all. Webster’s inconsistency has worn pretty thin with me. His averages over the last 15 games:
23mpg 8.4ppg 2.3rpg 41%fg 34%3pt
If you take out Websters two monster games, here is what the stats are in the other 13 games:
22mpg 6ppg 2.2rpg 34%fg 20%3pt
Webster simply isnt getting it done lately. The worst part is that he really doesn’t contribute much besides shooting/scoring and average(at best) defense. So if his shot is off, he really isnt helping the team, and that has pretty much been the norm as of late…
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
Millertime
Miller should never be taken out in the last minutes of a close game. If you want a three, he can penetrate and kick it out. If you want two, he can find the open man or create something for himself. If you want a turn over under pressure, sub Rudi for him. If you want confusion, let Roy be the quarterback. I don’t think Nate gives Dre the respect as a closer he has earned and deserves. Yes, I have seen Andre push too many shots, but he delivers more often than not in a tight race to the finish line.
It's longer than mine
I am hands down the greatest Blazers fan on Blazersedge.
by tominhawaii on Feb 27, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
He doesn't respect very many good players at this point then.
by Free Bayless on Feb 27, 2010 4:48 PM PST up reply actions
He loves the great players on the Blazers and Olympic team
Just being “good” doesn’t win championships
I am hands down the greatest Blazers fan on Blazersedge.
And that's why we need a better coach.
Because Nate is not Great and you must equate. Ok, enough Johnnie Cochran.
Andre gets left in or taken out at the end
based on how he’s doing. He was excellent earlier in the game, but when it came down to crunch time, he started forcing stuff and was bad.
He made that one three and instead of deciding to leave well enough alone, chucked up a couple more, the last one for no good reason that I could see.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
The ball should flow through Andre in crunchtime
Sure, Brandon should be taking many of the shots. But when he brought the ball up for an iso play, not only did everyone else stand around, they were clogging Brandon’s lanes part of the time. Let Andre go to work in the low post, if he is going to shoot you don’t want it to be from 20 feet.
Umm, defense?
There sure are a lot of people here complaining about Portland’s late game OFFENSE, plus the usual compliants about missing shots, nate is a bad coach, rotations stunk, x and y players suck, blah, blah, blah. Portland scored 111 and shot over 50%.
Offense…not the problem. Stopping the other team from scoring is just as important as scoring yourself. Letting Chicago score 115 and shoot over 57% is not getting it done. The Bulls scored at will in the OT, I believe they scored on their first 6 posessions. Yet, a whole lot of you are complaining about our OFFENSE?
The Blazers lost a tough game on the road, 3rd game in 4 nights, to a very hot team, that played very very well, with a budding superstar in Rose. And Portland played bad defense, period. Get back from the ledge.
by Pooh Richardson on Feb 27, 2010 8:18 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Bridge watch in PDX, LOL
THis team will finish the season strong
Camby will be a player that makes a difference
Roy is getting his game back
The other players who came back from injuries will get thier stride
by Hermistonmelons on Feb 27, 2010 8:33 AM PST up reply actions
Great writing
“The Bulls began coughing up the ball like grandma’s rancid phlegm.”
Priceless.
The Bulls' commentators were aweful.
Anyone else watch League Pass? I know Mike Rice isn’t exactly impartial, and I don’t think a team’s commentators should be, but the Bulls’ guys were particularly horrible. It made the loss much harder to take.
"...it was like he brought his own personal cross-wind to the arena." - Dave
I thought they were OK except for fouls and their love of Rose
Rose kind of deserved it though.
I am hands down the greatest Blazers fan on Blazersedge.
by tominhawaii on Feb 27, 2010 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
I thought they were horrible, too
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
Bulls fans think they are
horrible as well. They rip on opposing players all the time right before said player burns the Bulls. Stacey King is great when a Bull dunks tho.
Bosh or Bust
by JockstrapNoah on Feb 27, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
I just finished watching the game
Why doesn’t Miller move as fast on defense as he does on offense? I believe he is the reason Batum didn’t get more minutes.
I am hands down the greatest Blazers fan on Blazersedge.
you may be right
Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’
by 92wastheyear on Feb 27, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions
Miller slow on defense?
Look how many steals he gets. Maybe slow but he knows where to be. He may be small and not the fastest but how does he get those rebounds around towering 3,4, and 5’s. You people that think Andre is not a benefit at both ends need to maybe watch the game with a little more insight. Andre has more court sense than just about any active player. Get use to it, and if Nate wants the respect of Andre than he should show Andre he appreciates what Miller brings. Then maybe we could see some mutual respect and get on with the pursuit of building a championship team.
by thebigoutdoors on Feb 27, 2010 1:55 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Oh, please
Seeing as Nate starts Andre, plays him more than 30 mpg, and obviously signed off on trading Blake away, this “Nate needs to respect Andre” and “he should show Andre he appreciates what Miller brings” chorus is getting a little old.
What do you want him to do, genuflect in Andre’s general direction six times a day?
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
Nate v Miller
Tonight, Nate gave Miller his due. Pulling Miller in last minutes of the Bulls game was bone headed and lacked the appreciation of Miller’s skill and experience. And since you said please, Nate can get vindictive and petty with his allotments of playing time. He has been known to put his need for control above good discretion. He has been getting over himself lately, I’ll give him that.
by thebigoutdoors on Feb 28, 2010 1:00 AM PST up reply actions
How good of you to give him that
Miller was putting up horrible shots late in the Bulls game, and getting toasted horribly on defense.
I appreciate Miller’s skill and experience, but I don’t appreciate the way he plays every game, and when he’s having one of those games, I’m happy to see him sit down. If Nate had taken him out a minute or two earlier against Chicago, we’d have probably won.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
What?
You have got to be kidding. He subbed Rudy for Andre to maybe get a three to tie. When Rudy turned the ball over Miller was back in. Andre was out maybe twenty seconds. He barely got his butt in the chair. Miller did not come out because of performance. He came out because Nate was over coaching. Seconds later Rudy came back in for Miller to bring the defense out. This time they only needed two. Roy gets the ball and eats it not knowing what to do with it. Again Dre is not pulled because of his lack of play. Nate thought he had a good idea. Watch the game again and see how Nate wants Miller right back in the game after Rudy travels. You are nuts to think that Andre sitting would have won the game. Cough up the Kool Aid. Quit making excuses for Nate. Miller does push his shots, I admit. You have to admit Nate can pull some real boners.
by thebigoutdoors on Feb 28, 2010 8:01 PM PST up reply actions
Andre did not play the last 1:38
He played the first 3:22 of overtime, did nothing of any value during that time, shot a horrible 3 pointer for no reason, got absolutely torched on the defensive end as he had been throughout the game, and we fell behind by 5 points.
Instead of assuming someone is “nuts”, and “making excuses for Nate” and drinking Koolaid, you might actually engage with facts.
Of course “Nate can pull some real boners.” So did you in assuming I was talking exclusively about the fourth quarter when I said “late in the Bulls game”, which went into overtime.
Maybe I’m “nuts” to think Andre sitting would have won the game, but maybe not, seeing as Jerryd or Rudy could hardly have done much worse in overtime.
You’re also self-contradictory, by the way. You object to Nate pulling Andre late in the game and then come back and post that he was only out twenty seconds because we needed a three.
Andre had one assist and two turnovers in 15 minutes of play in the fourth quarter and OT. He made a 3 pointer and after that never did anything useful again, instead gunning up two more 3 point shots.
For me, it’s no big deal. He had a poor second half — it happens. Andre is a very good player who kept this team alive during the Brandon injury. What bugs me is the Andre fans who complain about him not getting enough respect even on the occasions when he stinks up the joint, and complain if Nate should actually sit him down for a little bit on those occasions.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by 





















