Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Game 61 Preview: Blazers vs. Bulls

Game Time:  5:00 Pacific  TV:  Comcast

The travelling road show pulls into Chicago tonight for the running of the Bulls.   Of course comparing the relative paces it's far more likely to be the running of the Blazers, but we'll let that go.

As seems all too typical of the Blazers' fortunes lately, they're running into a team that was muddling along into nowhere a few weeks ago and all of a sudden caught fire.  The Bulls have won 7 of their last 9, largely because they've been scoring out the wazoo.  They've thrown up 5 games of 109+ in the last three weeks and have not lost when scoring more than 100.  That pattern has been moderately consistent through the season but they haven't been getting into triple digits (let alone high triple digits) as frequently as they have this month.  A rejuvenated Luol Deng has been leading the charge most nights, scoring 31 in their last outing, but Derrick Rose, Kirk Hinrich, and Taj Gibson have also led the team in scoring.  Gibson has turned into a terror on the boards as well.  It's safe to say the Bulls are as close to firing on all cylinders as they're going to get.

Chicago starts Rose, Hinrich, Deng, Gibson, and center Brad Miller...a decent group, particularly with Gibson, formerly the weakest in the bunch, beasting out.  The recent trade of John Salmons and Tyrus Thomas has created space for these forwards plus new acquisition Hakim Warrick and they're performing.  Miller is a shadow of what he once was and is starting mostly because of Joakim Noah's foot injury.  Noah is slowly returning, averaging a little over 8 minutes in the Bulls' last three games.  Between his comeback and the play of Warrick, Miller isn't long for the first unit.

Under normal circumstances you'd call the Bulls' offense shaky.  They rank 27th in the league in offensive efficiency, 25th in shooting percentage, 27th in effective field goal percentage.  Nobody draws a lot of foul shots.  Nobody besides Deng and Hinrich shoots the three dependably.  They're only average as a team in fastbreak points generated.  That means the offense traditionally boils down to how many opportunities Rose (19.9 ppg) and Deng (18.2 ppg) can generate.  But you don't have to look at too many 115-120 point outings to realize that when the Bulls start sharing the ball, playing free and easy, they have real firepower.  This is bolstered by a fine corps of offensive rebounders to put second and third shots in.  Bog them down into a one-on-one game and their stars will score but they'll lose.  Take them for granted and everyone will do well and you'll lose.

Extra production from Chicago is a scary prospect because they're actually quite good defensively.  They're the best in the league in field goal percentage allowed.  Defensive efficiency is quite high.  Both happen because they are stingy with points in the paint and quite good at limiting teams to one shot.

Quite frankly this game is likely to be tough for the Blazers.  Irrespective of records Portland tends to fare well against teams that can't defend, a la Toronto, but struggle against teams that know what they're doing, like Atlanta and Milwaukee.  In other words the Blazers gladly accept the other team making the game easy on them but they don't know how to make the game easy on themselves.  Chicago is likely to make this game tough for Portland.  This could make for a glum evening even if the Bulls don't manage 120.

The Blazers will need to crack that defense and find a way to get easy shots.  They'll not be able to sit all night on the perimeter because they won't be able to balance it with unopposed one-on-one drives.  They'll have to fast break, cut, and get offensive rebounds.  Roy will need to use his height advantage over whoever defends him.  Aldridge will need to show up big too.  If Webster and/or Batum can take a slice out of Deng that's one leg of Chicago's offense gone.  But the Blazers still have to limit the Bulls to one move and one shot.  This should be easier because of their lack of distance shooting.  You can cheat off of several of their players.

Fortunately this game is the least critical on the trip.  It would be wonderful to go 5-0 but if you're going to lose one, this would be the one to lose.  Chicago's a good opponent and you've already bagged two wins so you can absorb the loss.  You don't want to lose in Minnesota tomorrow night for obvious reasons.  The Memphis closer would be the most significant win of all.  If the Blazers pull it off tonight an astonishing trip could be in the offing.  If not, it's no harm, no foul.

Take a look at the always-entertaining BlogaBull.

This would be your Jersey Contest game form for the evening.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 121 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yah! Go Blazers. No #2 Bull

Blazers are funny; who’s gonna show? Rudy again?

Camby back?

by Sashland on Feb 26, 2010 12:15 AM PST reply actions  

Well put, Dave.

I sincerely look forward to the game, and hopefully we can pull it out.

As for Camby, I believe the story is that he hopes to play against the Bulls, however he is a game-time decision, as far as I know. We’ll see what happens there, because we could use him.

(Insert something snappy)

by Jeremiah S on Feb 26, 2010 12:28 AM PST reply actions  

thanks. yes, he's not alone in hoping he plays, & we could use him.

Blazers can beat that bull if they show up to play, even without Camby. But, he helps.

by Sashland on Feb 26, 2010 12:35 AM PST reply actions  

We can beat the Bullsa

Maybe not as badly as we did last time but they are an up and down team.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Feb 26, 2010 12:38 AM PST reply actions  

That would be my sentiment.

But then I expect Portland to win every game they play. I just don’t freak out when they don’t.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Feb 26, 2010 5:07 AM PST up reply actions  

that's pretty standard for fans of all sport's teams

except L*ker fan, he’s arrogantly optimistic

and Philly fans, they’re cautiously pessimistic

I can’t get used to something so right —Paul Simon

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 26, 2010 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I love playing the Bulls

If for no other reason, it gives me a chance to visit blogabull. Their game recaps are fine, but that’s not what draws me in. It’s the anger. Blogabull. Is one of the angriest places on the internet, and that always makes for good reading. A number of their commenters also really hate Portland. I have no idea why, but again, it’s entertaining.

Here’s hoping for another nice blowout. It will be fun, and the fallout on blogabull will be first rate.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Feb 26, 2010 1:09 AM PST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Ahhhh! Lamarcus Aldridge!!!

Every time we see Tyrus we are reminded of what could have been!!!

by lama1 on Feb 26, 2010 8:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Now that Thomas got traded it's not quite the same anymore

Who is now supposed to be much better than Aldridge? Taj Gibson? Noah?

by Norsktroll on Feb 26, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

There is no one really who can match Aldridge

Maybe Noah when he’s healthy, but is more of a defensive asset.

by lama1 on Feb 26, 2010 8:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Not among our point guards, no.

I’d be surprised if we don’t see a lot of Nic Batum on Rose tonight. That’s about the only guy who might be able to keep up with him defensively.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Feb 26, 2010 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Well Yeah

I meant no one can match Aldridge on power forward and center save Noah.

by lama1 on Feb 26, 2010 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Noah is much better than Aldridge.

Also, Tyrus can still be better than him while chilling in Charlotte, he’s just that good.

Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 26, 2010 8:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm with you on your first point.

But I just don’t think Thomas would be as well thought of based on his body of work in the NBA had he not been drafted so highly. It’s not like he was a Thabeet-level mistake, but in my opinion it’s wishful thinking to give Thomas much of a chance of ever being better than Aldridge.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Feb 26, 2010 8:47 AM PST up reply actions  

I am obviously joking, the amount of people who think Tyrus Thomas is better than Aldridge

Is probably less than 3. He still has value as a defensive player, and if Josh Smith can become an efficient scorer, there is still hope for Tyrus. Sometimes all a player needs is a change of scenery.

Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 26, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

It's 8:50 AM here.

I clearly haven’t woken up.

But I know at least 2 people who agree with your first statement. Sad as that is…

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Feb 26, 2010 8:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes, the comments here on BE showcase a much more sane environment.

“Fire Nate! Ugh why did we sign Andre! Roy is hurt don’t play him! Wait, play him! Oden is a bust! No he’s not! LMA is soft! No he’s not! Jerryd is the future! He can’t play PG, lacks BBIQ, I CANT BELIEVE WE TRADED BLAKE IM GOING TO CRY HE WAS LIKE A BROTHER TO ME.”

Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 26, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions   4 recs

rec

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 8:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey, I said comments.

No argument that Dave+Ben provide a much happier editorial tone than Matt.

Taj Gibson is the face of Bulls basketball!
by Trey23 on Jan 5, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Feb 26, 2010 9:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Touche

In fairness, though, I think most of that is pretty typical fan angst. Blogabull seems to have an unusually high amount of genuine rage.

And as far as Blakey goes, I think you’d have a hard time finding two guys in Portland not named Mike who are upset about that trade.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Feb 26, 2010 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe not in Portland, but I know about 20 in Prineville.

Regardless of the lost of Steve and Travis, I think it was a great trade because of what I think Camby is.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Prineville lol

currently proposed trade in Prineville: that filthy Spaniard Rudy for Kyle Korver and/or Tyler Hansbrough

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Come on that is not true.

We can only hear the games on a bad radio station, but some of the bloggers and posters are intelligent enough to give us an insight on what is going on LOL.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

sorry

my pathetic attempt at redneck racial humor

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

I was also joking.

We are a ways in the sticks but still within Comcast range of blackouts, so your humor is warranted. And there may be a little racial thing around here. they are kind of clanish.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

I was born in Prineville

we are probably related

Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’

by 92wastheyear on Feb 26, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I miss Steve Blake.

Fortunately he is a free agent this summer. Too bad we only have an MLE to sign him with.

Wearing the black band for Jarrett Jack, Ime Udoka, Fred Jones, Sergio Rodriguez, Channing Frye, Luke Schenscher, Shavlik Randolph, James Jones, Josh McRoberts, Steven Hill, Jarron Collins, Michael Ruffin, Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw. Sacrificed to the unmerciful god of progress.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Feb 26, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Bullseye.

No pun indended. Well, at least until I realized a pun was there, then it was totally intended.

Wearing the black band for Jarrett Jack, Ime Udoka, Fred Jones, Sergio Rodriguez, Channing Frye, Luke Schenscher, Shavlik Randolph, James Jones, Josh McRoberts, Steven Hill, Jarron Collins, Michael Ruffin, Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw. Sacrificed to the unmerciful god of progress.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Feb 26, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

I will check out blogabull. Am from Chicago but didn't follow anything but MJ while there.

Loved to watch him play but knew only basics about bball. Those big city people can be pretty funny and angry all at the same time!

And come on…the Bulls are not the Cavaliers. They are just as likely to blow games as Blazers are…or more. They have less talent for one thing. And now FINALLY the Blazers have looked like a team that has played together a bit this season.
See this post if you haven’t. It is VERY good and informative:

http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/23/1322944/there-aint-no-show-time-without

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Alternative theories on Blogabull hate besides the Thomas/Aldridge trade:

1. Even as their real team was winning, they always got their butts kicked in Bulls vs. Blazers for the SNES?

2. They were morally outraged that Pippen came to play for us?

3. They resent a city with so many vegetarians?

by conspirator5 on Feb 26, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

4. were the 6th most fit city, and they are the 13th fattest :)

http://www.mensfitness.com/lifestyle/215

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

If you are going to lose one, this is the one to lose????

The voice of a championship mindset, LOL…C’mon Dave, we have a 5-0 roadtrip here. Don’t set the bar low.

by Hermistonmelons on Feb 26, 2010 2:21 AM PST reply actions  

I was feeling the same way.

No games are a sure win and no game is a give away, regardless of who we play from here on out is of equal importance.

Besides, with the Blazers reputation of playing down to their opponents, and their lack of confidence in playing against tough defenses. I would think we should encourage them to pull out all stops and get the victory.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Dave's post sounds negative. It's his opinion and it may be right but to me it gives the Bulls

all of the pro and focuses on the Blazer cons. This is how it came across to me anyway. Maybe the Bulls fans hate the Blazers cuz the Blazers have BEAT THE BULLS BADLY quite a bit in the past few seasons..INCLUDING this one.

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought he was saying

It is alright not to show up to this game because it wasn’t as important as the rest. If my take was wrong then it is my bad.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

He said the same thing about Orlando

He didn’t keep us from winning that game, so I wouldn’t worry about him too much.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

OK!!

As long as the team doesn’t think they don’t need to win.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

He's right, though

If we do end up losing a game on the trip, this one would be least damaging.

Perhaps a better way to say it is we need wins in the last two even more than we need this one.

If we want to chase a 4 or 5 seed, we probably need all five of them.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions  

With the inconsistency the Blazers have had lately

And with Chicago’s strong play lately, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Blazers on the wrong end of this one. That said, I still hope we win by 30. Or even twenty. Ah, who am I kidding, I’d take a win by 1 at this point.

Wearing the black band for Jarrett Jack, Ime Udoka, Fred Jones, Sergio Rodriguez, Channing Frye, Luke Schenscher, Shavlik Randolph, James Jones, Josh McRoberts, Steven Hill, Jarron Collins, Michael Ruffin, Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw. Sacrificed to the unmerciful god of progress.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Feb 26, 2010 4:30 AM PST reply actions  

I'd take win by 1 in any road game

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 4:40 AM PST up reply actions  

I'll take a win by 1 in any game, road or at home.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Feb 26, 2010 5:09 AM PST up reply actions  

I guess

Though a home win by only one against NJ or Washington or Minnesota, etc, would be disappointing in the sense that if we play well, we will win by more than that, with our current team against those teams as currently constructed.

Wins are good, but I like to see us play well even if we lose, and am disappointed if we play poorly even if we win.

Over the course of the season, though, when trying to get a playoff berth, you are right. Guarantee me 14 one point wins the rest of the way and 8 blowout losses, and I’d take it.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 6:37 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Have you been reading my mind.

I have been defending and preaching what you wrote for 40 years. Play with all you have and hustle and scrap, regardless of the outcome score wise, you are a winner.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions  

(wipes a tear from my eye)

Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’

by 92wastheyear on Feb 26, 2010 9:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Happens to me when the wind blows really hard

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

I've been preaching it for 40 years, too

We must be twins or something.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

I've been 39 and holding for over ten years

That’s as specific as I want to get.

But I’ll concede you probably converted me before I started preaching it.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 27, 2010 3:42 AM PST up reply actions  

The Bulls are just as likely to blow this one as the Blazers are. They may not take the BLAZERS

seriously. Maybe they will have trouble getting up for THIS one…they may play down to OUR team…not that the Blazers play badly…my point is that the Bulls are just as likely to do the same stupid things the Blazers have done in the past. I think the Blazers have been playing well and will continue to do so. Why WOULDN’T THEY????

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Not take us seriously?

We just won in Toronto. Even their fans on their website are saying we should be favored in this game (they’re wrong, but that’s what they are saying). We’ve beat them five straight, blew them out earlier this year, and blew them out both times last year, once by 40. They don’t want to beat us, they want to CRUSH us.

Everything else you say is true, but this is a good (if inconsistent) team that WILL take us seriously.

Oh, and they are under more pressure to hold their playoff spot than we are ours, so they actually need this win more than we do. Not saying they will play well, but they certainly won’t overlook this game.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

If you thought the loss to the Jazz stung...

don’t forget the Bulls blew a 35-pt lead to the KINGS earlier this season. The fans called for Vinny’s head after that loss too (again, despite their start player D Rose being hampered by injuries) and instead of freaking out the team stuck with him and they are now playing their best ball of the season.

That said, I like how we disrupt teams that get in a habit of scoring a lot of points and throw them off their game. It may not work against the Jazz, but I think we hold the Bulls to <100 tonight and pull out a tight one. It’s not great to always run, but I see a Roy ISO on the final play to seal the victory!

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 7:33 AM PST reply actions  

It was the Boston game that stung.

We played hard to the end in the Utah game, so I can live with that lost. The no show in the Boston game was horrible to take.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

BTW Dave

this is OT but great stint on MSP this morning. I appreciate you busting the Godfather’s chops! CIP was so butt hurt by your ribbing he didn’t talk the entire time! Great stuff, keep up the good work man

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 7:39 AM PST reply actions  

Will have to listen to that one. They are availalble on line..sans most commercials!

CIP’s voice sends me over the edge. LOUD and nasal. And he is also usually the VOICE OF DRAMA. So it will be good to not hear CIP.

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

funny

because CIP cracks me up and I can hardly stand to listen to Jaynes…to each their own I suppose

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

For the record

I love Chad. I mean, not like I love Midnight Truffle Blizzards or, you know, Sports Illustrated swimsuit models but I love Chad a lot for another dude who’s on the radio. However here’s the reality, at least as I perceive it: With Dwight in studio now (which was a great addition) that booth is crowded already. Getting three people in the conversation is hard. Even when I was in there before CiP and I were able to have more off-air conversation than on. Getting four people in the conversation just isn’t doable. So Chad’s not talking specifically because he’s making room for me. For a guy who makes his living doing radio, that’s awfully gracious.

Chad and I were developing quite the back and forth before though. The sad thing is I think I’m going to have to stop needling him on-air specifically because he can’t/won’t shoot back. It’s starting to look like I’m getting over on him. That’s no fun.

—Dave

by Dave on Feb 26, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

fair enough

I know Chad is in a position where he has to be extra careful about everything he says. I still laugh every time he calls someone a “Richard” I need to work that into my personal arsenal

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions  

That is the reason to keep doing it
It’s starting to look like I’m getting over on him

Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’

by 92wastheyear on Feb 26, 2010 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I appreciate you busting the Godfather’s chops

I guess Dave can’t respond on Dwight’s blog anymore?

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 26, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Nobody can, for now

But Dave made fun of Dwight’s bald head and then went on to talk about how a major part of BE is it’s fan posts, so he said blocking comments here would be out of the question. He didn’t call out DJ or anything, I was just reading between the lines…perhaps incorrectly

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Whatever teasing was there

was friendly. I respect Dwight and know him personally. That’s the only reason I ever needle anybody. If I’m after you I’ll go at it in a straightforward and serious manner, and certainly not in public. The more I get sarcastic with someone the more I like them.
  
Whatever you think of Dwight (and you end up thinking almost anything of people if they write in the public eye long enough) he has wisdom that most folks don’t. If he says something I think twice before dismissing it.. Even if I disagree with what he says there’s usually something illuminating in there.

—Dave

by Dave on Feb 26, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

That hurts
The more I get sarcastic with someone the more I like them.

Dave never picks on me anymore.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 27, 2010 3:44 AM PST up reply actions  

You need to shave your head

I am hands down the greatest Blazers fan on Blazersedge.

by tominhawaii on Feb 27, 2010 3:45 AM PST up reply actions  

it would be interesting

It would be interesting to see what average record of teams the Blazers have played this year over their last 10 games.

It seems like they are facing everybody just when they happen to be on a roll. Although there are certainly some exceptions like the last game against Orlando.

by lsjogren on Feb 26, 2010 7:44 AM PST reply actions  

if you're going to lose one

I think the two toughest games on this road trip are Toronto and Memphis. If you are going to lose one I think it shouldn’t be tonight’s because beating Memphis is not going to be easy. Lakers just barely beat them the other day.

by lsjogren on Feb 26, 2010 7:46 AM PST reply actions  

Ah, but if we have to lose one

this would be the best one to lose, because winning the Memphis game will hurt a potential playoff rival, the Memphis game is a conference game and so impacts playoff tie-breakers, and the Minnesota game is both a conference and division game, and so also impacts tie-breakers.

I would say this game and the Memphis game are the toughest on the trip. Toronto would have been the toughest, but Bosh was out.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 26, 2010 7:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Right.

You can’t take this one lightly and play hard at Memphis and maybe lose it also. I think we are guilty of looking past teams anyway, so don’t give them any ideas.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:49 AM PST up reply actions  

bulls

With Camby I would consider Blazers a heavy favorite, without him my opinion is that the game is a tossup.

by lsjogren on Feb 26, 2010 7:51 AM PST reply actions  

great comment about defensive-minded teams...

The blazers are still lacking in offensive efficiency. Teams that get after you always make it tough for Portland to score. The two victories thus far on this trip have been against very weak defensive teams- which always gets your hopes up.

Tonight we are likely to see the true Blazer offensive.

WARNING – this game may be offensive to some viewers.

by ralphzillo on Feb 26, 2010 9:07 AM PST reply actions  

Blazers are 6th in offensive efficiency

For all the harping, they are very efficient. It is no one thing that makes us efficient, but I think this stat is very telling:
out of the three main components of offensive efficiency (off reb. rat, TO rate, TS%), no single team leads us in more than 1 of those categories. We’re 6th in TO rate, 6th in Off. Reb. rate, and 9th in true shooting percentage. Thus, out of the 29 other teams, 18 lead us in one category, but we beat them in the other two, while we’re better than the other eleven teams in every category. Needless to say, we are the only team with this 2-1 advantage over every other team.

Really, its our 16th place defensive efficiency that hurts us.

by jnewhouse on Feb 26, 2010 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow - that really shows how worthless stats are

So when I see this team standing around and not moving the ball from the strong side to the weak side, when I see forced jumpers due to a dwindling shot clock, and when I see virtually no give and goes – it’s all an illusion?

by ralphzillo on Feb 26, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

no

but how many of the total possessions per game do you see that? I mean honestly, and especially in crunch time, even one bad play is going to leave a lasting impression, where the 10+ plays prior that did have screens/cuts/etc may not be. I’m guessing that if you actually logged each offensive set for the game, you would see more “good” sets than bad ones.

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

We put the ball in the hoop more efficiently than most teams.

This isn’t some advanced stat that magically says certain teams are good or not. However, I myself was surprised to see us so high. I think the difference between perception and reality is the result of several things.

-We have several players who can be more or less given the ball and score. Both Roy and LMA are shooting above 48% from the field. Additionally, miller can get his points. His shooting percentage isn’t that great, but he earns a lot of his points (over a third), at the line.

We’ve had issues in the forth quarter. These mishaps and shot clock violations are the ones that stick in our mind. Remember though, for every blown lead-and there have been far too many of them— we played well enough to get that lead.

-The offensive is repetitive and uncreative. we don’t see a lot of well drawn up plays. However, we’re still more efficient than the Jazz because we shoot almost as well, turn it over less and get more offensive rebounds.

The moral is, while what you see is happening, you may not be remembering things perfectly. We may not run many give and goes, but over 56% of our baskets are assisted, putting us in 11th among the league. Yes, we pass better than the majority of teams. We are also 8th in assist to turnover ratio. The things that are problems, we still do better than most of the league.

by jnewhouse on Feb 26, 2010 2:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It proves your observations are wrong.

But most people’s are, so don’t feel bad. The way to be smart is not to have better observations, but to stop trusting your observations.

Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.

by pualo on Feb 26, 2010 3:10 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Wrong

It doesn’t prove his observations are wrong at all. Mind you, they might be wrong, but in all probability, since others share those observations, it proves that those observations, while accurate, are incomplete, and there is additional data he is overlooking.

A classic error, frequent in sports, economics, politics, and life in general — to assume that a) your personal observations are accurate and b) they are complete enough to draw accurate conclusions. Assumption a) is sometimes wrong, b) is frequently wrong.

Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!

by jscot on Feb 27, 2010 3:49 AM PST up reply actions  

True

Also, don’t forget about our lastest trend of winning two then losing two.

Losing tonight and tomorrow would be bad. lets play hard and break the trend.

hg

by BBK on Feb 26, 2010 9:53 AM PST reply actions  

not only

should minnesota be an easy victory, but it’s yet another back-to-back which statistically is in our favor, short of us laying a complete egg and/or the wolves (Darko anyone?) going Nova.

by Billy Hoyle on Feb 26, 2010 9:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Smoke them sorry Bulls

Make Rose shoot……wait, how the heck are the Bulls scoring so much? Who do they have left that is an offensive threat??

I guess Deng is pretty good too, but damn, I hope we win this game

Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson

by Benson on Feb 26, 2010 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

Teams

are paying for letting Rose shoot, Flip Murray is going to have a big game tonight.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Feb 26, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Signs your team needs another scoring option:

1. Relying on Ronald Murray for buckets.

2. Having the word “Nets” on the front of your jersey.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Feb 26, 2010 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

The scary thing though??? They are scoring a lot recently.

It’s like Don Nelson is coaching the team through VDN.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Feb 26, 2010 10:33 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

In other words the Blazers gladly accept the other team making the game easy on them but they don’t know how to make the game easy on themselves.


Why so negative? Do you really think the Blazer defense/offense is crummy? These guys are not the Cavaliers. I do think Portland needs to take them seriously but your whole post sounds kind of like you don’t think much of the Blazers play?

I noticed the Blazers were moving around more on OFFENSE against Toronto. Less 3 in the corner standing..more cutting. Did anyone else notice this?

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

Noah and Loul Deng....I tried the block quote at the end and then puting my comment and it showed up in a separate grey box..so no comment from me!
The daily saga of Joakim Noah’s battle against plantar fasciitis in his left foot took another turn Thursday as the Chicago Bulls center left practice to undergo a bone scan.

""I’m hurting, obviously. But, it’s the end of the season right now and I want to be there for my team, and I want to be as ready as possible come playoff time."

NOTE: Luol Deng sat out most of practice with a swollen left knee

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 11:23 AM PST reply actions  

Update..these are on ESPN
Joakim Noah (plantar fasciitis) and Luol Deng (swollen knee) are both expected to play Friday night against the Blazers.

“Everybody’s playing,” Bulls head coach Vinny Del Negro said after Friday morning’s shootaround. “Lu’s got some swelling in his knee a little bit, but he’ll be fine. Jo is Jo right now. We’re just trying to manage that”

by Natsthecat on Feb 26, 2010 11:27 AM PST reply actions  

I hoping for a big game from LMA against the likes of Taj Gibson and Hakim Warrick

After the egg he laid in the Toronto game, he needs to step up tonight.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Feb 26, 2010 11:52 AM PST reply actions  

BlogaBull is freaking FUNNY

The anger over there is priceless. I desperately wish BE wasnt so sissy, but it is a well run blog which is a lot better than I can say for most teams.

Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson

by Benson on Feb 26, 2010 11:59 AM PST reply actions  

BlogaBull and Sactownroyalty are definitely the best basketball blogs outside of Bedge.

I’m interested in their teams more than ever.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Feb 26, 2010 12:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, this is one of the two games per season I cheer against the Blazers

And it’s always one of the tough ones to watch. I can’t wish you all luck tonight, but how about a wish for no additional injuries?

And try not to be too judgmental of BaB – it really is a good and fun place. :)

by wjb1492 on Feb 26, 2010 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

Both teams are dealing with injuries and trades.

I think this will be a close game. I see Miller trying to post up Rose. Not sure how effective Hinrich will be at guarding Roy.

There are some strange posters from Bedge who like to be baited into a meaningless argument.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Feb 26, 2010 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Nate

he can beat you with his’n, or he can beat you with your’n

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Feb 26, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Are they really that good?

dave, this is a pretty grim outlook on tonights game, we usually beat chicago, we blew them out by like 34 points last year, are we really that much worse than last year? I think we got the W tonight

by StocktonNEP on Feb 26, 2010 12:31 PM PST reply actions  

Oden was a big key.

Noah had no chance of slowing him down. Blazers were able to keep the Bulls off the boards and get tons of offensive rebounds against their smaller frontline.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Feb 26, 2010 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah...we need to get him healthy for next year

Roybot: "Then he said "My girlfriend is from LA." to which I replied "Well then you need to find a new girlfriend."’

by 92wastheyear on Feb 26, 2010 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm