Game 60 Recap: Blazers 101, Raptors 87
Long Story Short: Chris Bosh did his best impersonation of the finale of the Vancouver 2010 opening ceremonies by failing to function according to schedule and the Blazers capitalized on his absence, holding the high-scoring Raptors under 100 points for the first time in 20 games and getting big-time contributions from a bunch of sources to pull away for a 101-87 victory. Nate McMillan even lit an Olympics victory torch by sending in Patty Mills to close out the comfortable double-digit victory.
The Game
Portland followed the blueprint for winning on the second-half of a road back-to-back. They came out from the opening tip with purpose on both ends of the court: move the ball on offense and play active team defense. The Raptors neglect defense like Americans neglect speedskating and the Blazers wasted no time in picking up on that fact. 8 different Blazers scored in the first quarter alone with much of the activity coming off the dribble and at the rim. As Rudy Fernandez closed the quarter with a sweet drive-and-dish to Jerryd Bayless and then a three pointer of his own with less than 2 seconds in the period to give the Blazers a 32-24 lead, the game shifted almost immediately from "it would be nice to win this" to "for the love of Dave, please don't throw away another lead."
Spain and Turkey squared off in the second quarter for a nice little round of ... (OK, I admit it, I haven't watched enough of the Olympics to fill three consecutive paragraphs with references to Vancouver, so I'll stop here. I will literally just give up mid-sentence) ... basketball. Rudy continued in his new role as the Marca Marksman (or maybe the Spanish Harlem Globetrotter), scoring 6 of the Blazers 15 points in the period including two nifty layups that helped push the Blazers lead all the way to 17. In response, Turkoglu the Terrible had 8 points in the quarter, keying a mini Raptors rally that saw the home team close to within six at halftime.
With LaMarcus Aldridge somewhat occupied comparing statistics, body measurements and contract extension details with Andrea Bargnani, Andre Miller extended Portland's lead again (for good this time) with 3 baskets of his own and an assist for a Nicolas Batum 3 to open the second half. Jarrett Jack briefly rose to the occasion -- torching the net with a sweet three pointer and doing some damage off the dribble -- but it became clear over the course of the third quarter that the Raptors wouldn't be able to match their opponent basket-for-basket. Much like the first quarter, the last six minutes of the third were a team effort for the Blazers: Roy okie-doked for a pull-up and Bayless and Rudy combined for 7 points in the last 2 minutes.
Down 10 entering the fourth quarter and without a consistent third scorer to complement Turkoglu and Bargnani, the Raptors looked resigned to their fate. Andre Miller and Brandon Roy simultaneously sensed that weakness -- and the lack of defensive intensity -- as they pounded away at the paint until the Raptors finally broke. Miller started to get pretty freaky on the ball, mercilessly backing down his man and scoring first on a turnaround and then again going to the basket. Roy briefly interrupted the Dre Show with the ultimate showstopper: a full lefty crush on Andrea Bargnani that made Blazersedge Salary Cap Guru Storyteller so excited that he randomly started deleting spreadsheets in glee (I was sitting right next to him. It was crazy). From there, it was cruise control to a solid double-digit victory, the Blazers' 11th in 14 tries on the second half of a back-to-back.
Individual Observations
Brandon Roy looked better than he has since... I'm addicted to twitter so I no longer have a long term memory... well, since I can remember. His numbers -- 20, 5 and 5 in 37 minutes -- closely approximate his season averages. He did get blocked 3 times at the rim and while his top-side athleticism seems to be coming back, it's not completely there play-to-play. He has been regularly catching breathers on defense and tonight was no exception but the Raptors weren't able to really exploit that advantage. Miller helped take some of the late-game load off of Roy tonight too. It was a good balance: not too much Brandon, not too little Brandon. He did flash a nasty grimace while shooting a late-game free throw. Let's just pretend that didn't happen.
LaMarcus Aldridge was quiet tonight but he picked a good night to lay an egg with everyone else clicking so well. 9 points on 4-12 shooting and just 2 boards against no Bosh? Not ideal. I did like his night defensively, though, as he had a fierce block from behind on a driving lay-up attempt and also handled the perimeter pick-and-rolls solidly. Perhaps his shooting stroke didn't clear customs?
Andre Miller played like he knew he was the best point guard on the floor and he didn't have to worry about looking over his shoulder anymore. Tonight was cool, calm and collected Dre: 18: 10, 7 and 3 steals and a solid control over the game's pace. His early game drive right past Turkoglu for the and one was a tone-setter. "That elbow was for your wife. Kevin Pritchard says hello. Jay Jensen says you can have your Turkish CD back."
Nicolas Batum saw a good chunk of his minutes go to Rudy Fernandez tonight but he knocked down his shots and played with his usual cool rhythm. As mentioned on the Wingcast this week, one benefit of starting Batum is that you don't need to give him 25 minutes for him to make an impact. He's ready to go from play 1. Indeed, he scored the Blazers opening basket tonight on a nice pass from Juwan Howard.
Speaking of Howard, the starting unit looked kind of great with him back in there in Marcus Camby's absence. Funny how that works out. From start to finish, a "we're all having a good time here" game from Howard, who threw down a phenomenal one-handed dunk on a run out. His shooting stroke got going too. It's funny how he's not nearly the defensive liability when playing against a team that doesn't have a true interior threat at the 5 spot and is missing its starting 4.
Rudy Fernandez: shake, shake, shake what your mother gave you. 17 points on 6 of 9 shooting including 3 of 5 from distance. He was pulling the trigger and hitting the target. He was moving the ball well and even was active on the glass. Nate McMillan rewarded him for all of those things tonight. The challenge, as always, is to do it again (and again and again).
McMillan has talked for awhile about how Jerryd Bayless and Rudy are a potential combination coming off the bench. He believes the two should be able to set each other up offensively and handle most back-up guard rotations defensively. To be honest, we haven't seen a ton of success with the Bayless/Rudy combo until tonight, when the two combined for 28 points off the bench and changed the tempo of the game on both runs through the rotation.
Dante Cunningham had a solid DC night: 7 points, 4 boards, 1 block, 1 steal. I just wish there were 21 minutes for him every night.
Martell Webster: Zero points. 8 minutes. I can barely remember a second that he stepped on the court. What a league this is. Anyone know the Seattle version of Eurosport?
Patty Mills and Jeff Pendergraph played 51 seconds each. They're both on the team so they'll each get gold medals.
Final Thoughts
Tonight felt like a game from last season, one of those "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" games with 5 guys in double figures, 2 more with 9 points and another with 7. The ball was moving (25 team assists) and the game looked easy. Some of that is Toronto without Bosh but a good chunk of that was a solid mental game from start to finish. One of the more aesthetically pleasing victories in awhile.
Boxscore and NBA.com recap from Holly MacKenzie.
For north of the border musings, check out Raptors HQ.
I forgot to link up a brief Q and A I did with Nets Are Scorching on Tuesday. Here are their game recaps from last night's win in New Jersey.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
122 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NICE
A solid road victory is always sweet.
I'm just not crazy about player nick names...
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Feb 24, 2010 8:41 PM PST reply actions
Weak compariosn to the opening ceremony
Because that implies the rest of the parts were playing well and they were not.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
LaMarcus
Man, when he decides not to show up, he really means it. 2 rebounds? Seriously? That’s a matter of effort, purely effort.
Anyway, great win. Love that this team is still so deep that LA and Webster can disappear and the team can still blow out the Raptors on the road (minus Bosh, granted).
I hope Martell gets an opportunity to pick up big minutes in one of the next two games. Some of these guys will need a bit more rest. His time ought to return after games like this.
At least he was COMMITTED to not rebounding tonight.
"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden
by dario argento on Feb 24, 2010 9:33 PM PST up reply actions
He was defending a 3 point threat
so he was drawn out of the key the whole night.
Number of rebounds is irrelevant when that happens. Their starting frontcourt had only one offensive rebound, so that tells the story — these guys were playing outside on that end. If Marcus had played, he would have hardly had any defensive rebounds, either. It was a night for the guards to rebound, and they did. All is good.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Also...
…he played a lot of minutes in NJ the night before – fatigue may have had something to do with it.
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
although
He did make 2 of his 3 shots and seemed slightly less tentative in the 4th. Something to build on
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 11:43 AM PST up reply actions
LA HAS PLAYED MORE MINUTES THAN ANY PLAYER SINCE THE ALL STAR BREAK.
Including 46 minutes the night before. Let’s give LA a huge break on this one.
Let's do this when we play Toronto again, when Bosh is back.
Brandon Roy - The Savior Of Portland Basketball
by rise_stand_resist on Feb 24, 2010 8:49 PM PST reply actions
Yep, that Roy drive to the hoop
with Miller getting the assist was my favorite play. I just hope I can find my backup copies of those spreadsheets – after months of trying scenario after scenario, I had finally outlined the perfect trade plan for this summer that would, IMO, guarantee multiple championships for the Blazers. But now I can’t for the life of me remember all the components….
It was awfully nice to see the Blazers actually pull away from a team in the 4th quarter…..
"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY
My recommendation
Let KP figure that trade out, and save yourself the trouble.
Good win.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Turkoglu the Terrible...
Dave you are the best.
Official Adrian Wojnarowski Hater.
The Ardent Optimist.
No cheap shots at Andre Miller tonight!
Nice win, Portland.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
I'm starting to think Tom is right about Miller. He may just be a dirty player.
I heard MB say that Miller “used an ice pick” to get to the basket on one drive.
#52
As long as he uses it on the other team
instead of our coach or the guy getting PT in front of him, I’ll live with it.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Or better yet
Teaches LMA the fine art of stealthy icepicking in the paint.
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
one benefit of starting Batum is that you don’t need to give him 25 minutes for him to make an impact.
While this is true, once you’ve played Nico Suave for 25 minutes, why stop there?
“Once you go worm, that’s what you’ll yearn!”
I wonder if a Seattle-area webloid will post an article tonight about Marty’s discontent?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
although
weird enough Batum was the only player with a negative +/-, at -14. Which is weird, because I thought he played well. Maybe just bad timing for his stints…who knows
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 11:45 AM PST up reply actions
I was watching the game after I knew the +/- and this IS indeed what happened. Batum came in
when Rudy came out at one point…and I think Bayless was also out. Anyway, he wasn’t in when the Blazers were doing the heavy scoring. He did play well. He lost minutes to Rudy which last night was just fine. He will get his minutes. Just hope he knows he makes a difference!
Didn't get to catch the whole game.
These early games combined with my work schedule has been killer lately. Missed all of New Jersey and missed first three quarters tonight, but I’ve heard good things so I’ll just go off of that. Brandon slowly but surely getting back into the groove.
I'm not saying, I'm just saying.
The difference between this night and last night
Is that when Toronto made their run we responded well, unlike last night where we stumbled across the finish line.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
The difference
is that this game, Toronto got hot to make a run but cooled down early enough to make it easy for us, while last game, NJ got red hot to make a run and stayed red hot until the last couple minutes before they cooled down, making it a little more tense.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
If you watch on Comcast Sports Net ....
…. you can see the replay a couple of hours later. That’s how I got to see it.
Of course with the replay starting at 10:30, it meant it was after 1 before I got to bed. Not as easy anymore when I get up at 5 every morning.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
To be honest, we haven’t seen a ton of success with the Bayless/Rudy combo until tonight, when the two combined for 28 points off the bench and changed the tempo of the game on both runs through the rotation.
Three words: degree of dificulty
It was good to be on the “other” side of Andre Miller getting into Jarrett Jack’s head
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Several years ago,
when Jack was a Blazer and Miller a Nugget, the Blazers had a one-point lead and the ball in the closing seconds, with Jack bringing it up the court.
Miller picks his pocket clean and scores. Nuggets win. Blazers season goes straight down the toilet.
I am Spartacus and I approved this message
by EngineerScotty on Feb 24, 2010 9:35 PM PST up reply actions
that's the play
to Jack, Andre Miller is like what Jerry Sloan is, to Nate McMillian
the kids call it being “pwned”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Jarrett had a good game this time
It isn’t as if Andre dominated him. But Andre A) had more help and B) made several key plays in the fourth that helped seal the game.
I wouldn’t say Andre “got into his head” in this game, though. It’s not as if Jarrett folded or made a lot of bad plays.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
down the stretch
JJ just lowered his head and drove to the rim and came up dry (similar to Bayless but Jarrett’s been around longer than Jerryd.) This has nothing to do with Miller, but Jack’s a SG who thinks he’s a PG, and little has changed since his days in a Blazer uniform, except that he’s playing on teams that keep running him out there
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
a few quotes
"We tried different guys on (Miller and Roy), we tried different looks and we couldn’t stop them," Toronto coach Jay Triano said. "They were better than us tonight."
"They had too many easy points," Turkoglu said.
For Miller, it was his second straight game without a turnover.
"Every team worries about turnovers but this team stresses it more than some others," Miller said. "I’ve kind of put an emphasis on that in my game, making simple passes and not a lot of high-risk passes like I normally do."
"We didn’t do a good job of taking care of the ball early and it helped them establish the lead they had at halftime," Jack said. "It’s tough to recover when you give the other team extra possession."
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
very telling
“Every team worries about turnovers but this team stresses it more than some others,” Miller said. "I’ve kind of put an emphasis on that in my game, making simple passes and not a lot of high-risk passes like I normally do.
With risks, come rewards. I WANT andre taking some smart calculated risks here and there. We all know we could use the easy buckets that would come with those risks, even with the increase in turnovers. we could have kept Blake as the starter and not brought in Andre if we want to be a team that just makes the simple passes.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
best alley-oop (lob passer) in the league?
‘Dre still has the skill, but we’ve only seen flashes of it because he’s playing for a risk-averse coaching staff
Keep in mind that Miller also player for Majerus, and Nate is a softy compared to Rick
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
You nailed it in your final comments...
…this game did remind me of last season…We had several weapons firing and it was enough to beat a good team – only 7 home defeats – on the road. I hope the players can find the same consistency they had last season.
a good team missing an MVP candidate...
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 24, 2010 9:29 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, but they'd won two straight without him
They are still a legit team, and hard to beat at home.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Liked LMA's defense?
How many times did Jack blow by him for a layup tonight? Nights like these I wish LMA would say, “Oh no they DIDN’T draft Bargagni over me!!!” Instead, Bargagni looked like the better player tonight.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
I had to look up myopic.
It could mean either short-sighted or narrow-minded. Which do you mean? Either way, I stand by my comments. Color me unimpressed … once again … by LMA’s play, particularly on defense, against a team he could have dominated if he wanted to.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
did you watch the game???!!!???
just kidding…(sort of). I don’t really want to call you out for seeing something I didn’t, but LMA has been a frequent target this season, without any real substantial cause.
Tonight, LMA wasn’t horribly productive – but his lack of production was an anomaly, and we hardly got killed by some very skilled offensive big men (Bargnani was only 6-16, no other big had a good night). Plus, LMA’s box outs were a big reason why Miller and Fernandez had 7 rebounds each. Roy and Bayless also rebounded from the guard position (9). That’s 23 rebounds from four guards. That doesn’t happen if LMA is getting beat inside.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 24, 2010 11:39 PM PST up reply actions
Meh.
I watched the game. The whole game. I don’t care so much about the offensive production or lack thereof. It’s the defense that bothers me. I saw lazy rotations, slow closeouts on the perimeter, and desireless interior D. I didn’t notice the boxouts. If he was boxing out, great. I was miffed by what I saw before the boxouts.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Frankly Dre's
defensive lapses on Jack were what I saw. There was one sequence where Dre would drive and score…and Jack would beat him back and get an even easier one. He made for some unfortunate switches, and then on one occasion forced LMA to help, which left Barnagni open for the easy three. He also got crunched into some screens that were ugly. But he’s so mad efficient on offense, and gets enough steals, that you just have to forgive and work with that part of his game.
The team is really starting to give Andre his space and niche. You can tell the other players seem to know what to expect with him, in the way they do with Roy but don’t yet with Rudy or Jay.
Good comment
Dre was poor on defense again, and it created problems that made our bigs look bad defensively.
Still, we compensated well enough, and as you say, Andre was so effective on the other end that you can live with some slop on defense. That will be even more the case when Marcus gels with the team defensively.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
then you missed a lot.
LMA simply didn’t fail in this game; the score indicates that; the performance of the Toronto bigs supports that; the success of his teammates supports that.
The Blazers didn’t win in spite of LMA, tonight, even if you want to argue that he deserves condemnation because he didn’t fill the stat sheet.
Frankly, when his direct opposition underperformed, you can’t knock his defense.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 25, 2010 1:21 AM PST up reply actions
Ugh.
The is my last word because I’m going to bed. Please don’t tell me I missed something simply because I saw it differently than you. Our difference in perception is not a lack of perception on my part.
A team win does not exonerate LMA in my opinion. Not sure how lauding the underperformance of LMA’s covers exonerates him either, when they all outperformed him! Bargagni wasn’t particularly efficient, but he got around LMA virtually at will, outscoring and outrebounding him. Evans outrebounded. Amir Johnson nearly doubled his average production in only 6 extra minutes! Oh wait, and these are backups? I hate to think of what might have happened if Bosh had played.
You say LMA didn’t fail. Fine. I say he’s lucky our guards played well enough to cover his butt. Maybe the Blazers didn’t win in spite of him, but they probably won despite him, or maybe just to spite him.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
A few facts
First, their starting frontline got 1 offensive rebound for the game, which tells me we didn’t get killed on the boards by what was going on. They play their big men outside, meaning the boards on that end will be won or lost by the guards. Our guards did fine.
Second, Amir had 8 rebounds. Three came in the first six minutes of the second quarter. For a little more than half of that time, Aldridge was sitting. Three more came in the last 4 1/2 minutes of the second quarter — LMA didn’t come in until 3:30 left in the half. I don’t know how many of those rebounds came when LMA was on the court, but not all of them did. Amir only had two rebounds in the second half, in the start of the fourth — when Aldridge was out again. In other words, most of Johnson’s rebounds came when Aldridge was not in the game, so it’s an irrelevant comparison.
Reggie Evans had five rebounds in his spell in the first 7 1/2 minutes of the second quarter. Again, LMA was not in the game for most of that. He had one in the last minute of the third, and two in the first four minutes of the fourth — again, LMA was not in the game for most of that.
We weren’t using Aldridge against those guys, because we needed his quickness on Bargnani on the perimeter, so when Bargnani played, LaMarcus played. And he defended Bargnani well.
Bargnani shoots .473 this year, but was .375 in this game. He shoots .361 on 3s, averaging 1.5 per game, but made only 1 of 6. He averages 17.4 points, but got only 15, when he was going to be much more of an offensive focus because of the absence of Bosh.
Any time a team’s leading scorer is out and you hold the second leading scorer below his average, you figure you’ve defended him pretty well.
Aldridge had a horrid shooting night, but he stayed in the flow of the offense. He didn’t force up bad shots to try to make things happen, like some of our guards do when they are having bad nights.
LaMarcus didn’t play great help defense, but when has he? He did a decent job, but last time I checked, PGs are usually quicker than PFs. Why was he even defending PGs, anyway? Because of defensive breakdowns elsewhere.
If you ask me if I prefer Bosh or Aldridge, the answer is obvious, but if you ask me if I prefer Aldridge or Bargnani, that answer is also obvious.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
by jscot on Feb 25, 2010 4:12 AM PST up reply actions 4 recs
Funny how informed opinion always seems to trump ...
… plain old opinion.
Nice work as always.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
LA didn't have a great game
But he had a couple of key plays in what was the deciding run for us so he was fine.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
agreed
He may have only been 2-3 in the fourth, but that was the best fourth quarter I can remember from him in a while. I guess that’s either good or bad lol
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 12:09 PM PST up reply actions
Bargnani is the better player though
If the 2006 draft had to be done over, it would likely be:
1. Roy
2. Rondo
3. Bargnani
4. Gay
5. Aldridge.
Andrea Bargnani was playing out of position at the 4 last night, giving up his usual quickness advantage and yet put up okay numbers. But I’m not here to spark an argument. As a person who sees a lot of Bargnani on a regular basis, I appreciate the quality of his game moreso than others, and one thing he doesn’t get enough credit for is his defense. He strikes me as following a similar development path as Andrew Bogut in terms of the time it will take him to show his full complement of skills, but it will be interesting to see whether those outside Toronto give him his due when he does begin to show.
In this league, the media is so quick to affix a label or reputation to players that they don’t always escape the early notions associated with their games.
by HQ Interloper on Feb 25, 2010 8:30 AM PST up reply actions
Aldridge has better production
So why exactly is Bargnani the better player? Because he’s still developing? Then, perhaps LMA will develop further, too.
As of today, LMA is a much better player.
And Gay doesn’t play defense.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Agree to disagree
A few things:
I would argue that LMA’s upside isn’t as significant, given that he has been playing the 4 for a majority of his basketball career while Bargs has spent the last few years learning the nuances of the centre position. Additionally, relative to other players at his position his advantage from game to game isn’t as significant as Bargnani’s can be against opposing centres. There are a lot of good to very good 4s in the league so maybe LMA doesn’t get the credit he deserves, but Bargs realizes multiple advantages against his covers most nights.
by HQ Interloper on Feb 25, 2010 10:42 AM PST up reply actions
If we were just talking offense
you might have a point.
Aldridge, while not a stellar defender, is way ahead on that end.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Poor wording
“you might have a point”.
You DO have a point. But I don’t see Bargs ever becoming a real defender, while Aldridge, IMO, is continuing to improve.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
The issue with the Raptors defense is Calderon
The bigs often times have to compensate for his porous perimeter coverage and susceptibility to penetration by switching constantly. As a man defender Bargnani is very good, help defense is his current weakness and that has more to do with always being iffy because Calderon is out there with him. Bosh suffers from the same problems. But I raise a glass to you and look forward to continuing this argument in the coming years. Your team is very good and I have adopted it as my Western Conference follow.
We fans watch so much of our own team that it’s hard to be objective. It’s like having an attractive wife whose looks you just take for granted in your irrational yearning for the company of Jessica Alba.
by HQ Interloper on Feb 25, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
That last statement is so applicable to a lot of fans here.
Personally, I think my wife looks good. If she suggests a threesome with Jessica Alba, I wouldn’t necessarily say no. But I wouldn’t go looking to make it happen.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Good luck to you, too
I like your team.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#10 #52 -- #5 #7 & #88 are back!
I have no real basis for this, other than comments I've read ...
… that are attributed to opposing coaches and GM’s concerning Aldridge ,
But if the draft was done over today, Roy goes first and Aldridge second. Rondo probably ahead of Bargnani, primarily due to position played. I’m not sure if Rudy Gay makes top 5. I’d have to look up the rest of the guys available that year.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Rondo would go ahead of Aldridge 10 times out of 10
but Aldridge would most definetely go ahead of Bargnani.
Paul Millsap might crack the top 5, but I doubt it. I’d rather have him for the Blazers over LNA, but that’s another story. If you were redrafting now, I’d say Roy, Rondo, Aldridge, Gay, Bargnani and Millsap would be picks 1-6.
Free AK1984
Sounds right
though team needs might impact some of those, despite the “best player available” creed, because the distinctions between Gay, Bargnani, and Millsap as far as which is “best” are kind of blurred.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Bayless probably rates more than a complete oversight in "individual observations"
even Webster, Mills and Pendergraph got some attention
11 points, 4 assists, 4 rebounds and only one turnover in 17 min? Not bad for the backup point guard.
And he had a HUGE 3 to push the lead back to 4 and key the run
That gave us a big lead for good.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Yeah I think when Jerryd plays well it gives the other players a lot of confidence. When he is balling we always seem to be MUCH better.
"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden
by dario argento on Feb 24, 2010 9:37 PM PST up reply actions
his jumper
is like panning for gold. Sometimes it’s 1849, sometimes it’s 1860 with him. When he’s able to drain just a couple from outside, it makes both his AND the other guard’s game so much better. The floor opens up because it REALLY gives the defense pause. Too many weapons.
I look for a lot more consistency next year
on that jumper. It’s a lot better this year than it was last.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Maybe we should just stay on the road.
Last 2 home games-losses.
Last 2 road games-wins.
"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden
Or play only the second of back to backs
11-3 in those games.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
For once, we won both of them
Usually, we lose the first and win the second.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
and not to jinx it
but our next back to back opportunity is in Minnesota. Good chance to make it 12-3
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 12:11 PM PST up reply actions
Last 3 road games
Phoenix before the break.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
touche'
"What people need to know is that those pictures were taken a year and a half ago, and I've grown since then." - Greg Oden
by dario argento on Feb 24, 2010 9:38 PM PST up reply actions
Minor correction
It was a Dutchman, not an American, that forfeited the speedskating gold after being DQ’d for failing to switch lanes.
I am Spartacus and I approved this message
Minor correction to my minor correction
Right Dutch speedskater, wrong incident.
Sven Kramer, the Dutch skater seen telling off a clueless American reporter who didn’t know about his sport, after winning a gold medal earlier in the games (the clip Ben linked to), made headlines today when he was disqualified in the gold medal race after failing to switch lanes when required to do so. (Skaters alternate in each lap between the inside and outside lanes).
And rather that merely dropping from gold to silver—which he would have done had he merely lost the race—he instead went home with no medal whatsoever. The winner of the bronze-medal race was awarded the silver, and the loser of the bronze-medal race was given the bronze.
Karma sucks, I guess….
I am Spartacus and I approved this message
by EngineerScotty on Feb 24, 2010 9:54 PM PST up reply actions
It actually goes beyond that
Kramer DID switch lanes when he WASN’T supposed to because his coach lost track and told him to. Kramer didn’t think he was supposed to but deferred judgment to his coach, which got him DQ’d. At least he won a gold earlier in the games.
Hard to find good coaches these days.
I am Spartacus and I approved this message
by EngineerScotty on Feb 24, 2010 10:13 PM PST up reply actions
you'd think that with technology these days
they could figure out a way to illuminate the ice wih the skaters country-color as a lane indicator
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
The South Korean women got hosed last night by the judges.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Happy for Rudy
I’m happy he had a good game tonight. After the talk about him going back to Spain it’s good to see him play the way he needs to in order for him to get the 30 minutes a game he wants. Now, can he keep it up???
If he can
I’m sure he will get the minutes he wants but I’m not willing to say he’s back again until he’s kept it up for at least 3 or 4 games. He’ s my favorite but has been pretty inconsistent … not that pretty much everyone on the team hasn’t had that problem this year but still. It’s so awesome when he’s on and if he keeps playing like he did tonight or at least in the same ballpark Nate will have to play him more.
LOL, He meets both the height/weight criteria, and meets the weird looking alien face requirements
Also, his out of the world numbers this season help make him look like he’s from another world.
I think LMA
went MIA on purpose just to ruin any chance that we might do an LMA for Bosch trade this summer. Wouldn’t want the Toronto brain trust to see that he can play. Can’t say that I blame him. Toronto is a cold, dark place in the winter.
misc
I wasn’t as impressed with Bayless’ play as some people here were although I was really glad to see him be able to knock down some jumpers. I was suprised though he didn’t ram his way to the rim much in a game against such a soft defensive team.
One thing this game got me to thinking about – is the East just a much inferior conference to the West? I mean, Toronto has been on a roll lately and yet they looked pretty darn weak. Maybe it’s just that the caliber of a team they are drops like a rock if Bosh isn’t on the floor.
Anyway, I think this game was a tremendous morale booster for the team and the fans. Playoffs are looking more likely.
I think the Hornet’s and Rockets are not going to make the playoffs. I’m not quite sure about writing off the Grizz. They played well against Lakers the other day (even though they lost). But I think there is a good chance the Spurs drop out of the playoffs. I just don’t buy the view of all the commentators that they are going to perk up and finish the season strong. They just look to me like they have run out of gas.
It was a dandy win!
And I agree about Bayless. He made a slew of mistakes last night.
If this Blazer team doesn't light your fire, then your wood is wet!
He was good in the first half
if I remember right, but negatives outweighed positives in the second.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
which is why
the game against memphis on monday is so important. blazers really need to win that one
another good sign
It seems like weak play in crunch time, mainly on the offensive end, has been a huge problem for the Blazers ever since somewhere around the time they played Memphis at the Rose Garden.
They showed a lot more confidence and aggressiveness this time around. Hopefully a sign of things to come.
you said you would stop
Patty Mills and Jeff Pendergraph played 51 seconds each. They’re both on the team so they’ll each get gold medals.
that made me chuckle
look at rudy gettin it! yessir!
loveisrespect
by portlandgiirl91 on Feb 24, 2010 10:30 PM PST reply actions
So...
let’s go back and look at the comments on Rudy…quite amusing in retrospect.
#52. Get well soon.
by Eat Politicians on Feb 24, 2010 11:41 PM PST reply actions
PS
another good night from Andre…thank god we have a real point guard now!
#52. Get well soon.
by Eat Politicians on Feb 24, 2010 11:42 PM PST up reply actions
Air Howard
When howard had that dunk I was hoping he would showboat a little like he did that “one” dunk earlier in the season. Still this was a fun game to watch and “both teams played hard”. Martell Webster come out come out where ever you are..
On game day, I leave the turkey alone because it is some chemicals in that thing. Nate Mcmillian 11/26/09
by slim503 on Feb 25, 2010 2:40 AM PST via mobile reply actions
didn't you see the stare?
that is showboating when you’re OG.
by ItsMrHarris2u on Feb 25, 2010 8:07 AM PST up reply actions
*
*OG stands for ‘old guy’ in the case of Howard.
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
still cracks me up
every time Barrett calls him “Old Man River”
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 12:14 PM PST up reply actions
focus in the wrong areas lately
too much focus on losing leads lately and not enough focus on the fact that we were able to build those leads in the 1st place. Reading the forums will make one think this is a team about to crumble. I disagree. This is a team about to break through a wall.
by ItsMrHarris2u on Feb 25, 2010 8:05 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I have wondered
if you are right about that.
This team looks on the verge of destroying some teams.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Mr Harris , we need more people like you here.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
he'll be here a lot more too
since Dwight Jaynes shut out his commentors today, because he couldn’t stand to be wrong! Ok now I’m making false accusations, but he did shut them down and I saw MrHarris over there a lot trying to calm the dissenting ranks
by Billy Hoyle on Feb 25, 2010 12:15 PM PST up reply actions
Now THAT's the way to play hoops!
Dre had a huge game, controlling the offense beautifully. He’s the main reason we had 7 guys with 9 or more points!
Rudy had his best game of the season… Maybe this team just needs more controversy: Dre barks at coach, goes on to play like the All-Star we thought we got… Rudy is in controversy in the media, goes on to have his best game…. C’mon media, let’s call Rex out next…
Roy had his second excellent game in a row. It’s pretty ovbvious he’s playing in pain, and gutting it out, so kudos for that… Looks like I may have been wrong advising him to sit out a couple of months… (But I reserve to undo that mea culpa if he gets hurt…)
I don’t know how many fast break points we got, but I do remember several when the smaller unit was out there, and of course that awesome Howard jam was sweet. You go old man!
All in all, a great team victory. Gotta love that 2-0 start to the trip…
Bayless is making progress on his outside shot. Last season: Consistently missed this season: hit or miss Next season: consistenly make?
I have got to be optimistic about a guy who works as hard as Bayless does.
Besides a consistent jump shot he also needs to vastly improve his court vision. But again, just like his jumpshot, he has shown glimmers of hope there whereas last year there was not much sign of hope.
I liked the guard rotation in this game
Bayless and Rudy played with Roy for a pretty long stretch with Miller going out relatively early. Bayless and Rudy played without Roy for a short amount of time. Then, Miller came in and played some with Rudy as the shooting guard. The Bayless, Rudy, Roy 3 guard line-up worked especially well, though Torotno is not exactly a defensive juggernaut.
It was interesting yesterday afternoon skimming through the game thread.
It was the first time this year I even looked at one. But I was at work and had plans to have dinner with friends afterward, so I knew I was going to miss the game.
I skimmed down to the bottom to get a feel for how the game was going and saw how everybody was raving about how well the Blazers were doing and praising individual players. Only to see all that emotion come falling through the roof. People were dismayed that Portland had squandered a 17 point lead. Then I watched the game when I got home. I only knew the half time score and had the sense from the game thread that the team really stunk it up in the first half.
Guess what? I saw some really good play from our team including a nice run and then I saw Toronto make a run of their own to close out the first half. I was asking myself what was all the angst and breast beating about. Teams go on runs. Even the worst teams in the NBA do it. All in all, POrtland looked pretty good.
In nothing else, I was reminded why I no longer frequent game threads.
I’m also looking forward to POrtland trying to go 5-0 on this trip. I don’t expect them to, but I also think they are capable of doing it. And once again, if they do, are we really going to be disappointed in them? 5-2 is a record that even the most dour fan has to find acceptable. Particularly in a week when all of the teams below us still with a chance are losing as well.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
I really do think that this team is going to end the season...
above .500 on the road. They’ve had as many losses on the road as they’ve had at home.
Thirteen left, 8 against winning teams
We need six more wins. If we can beat Chicago (tough assignment), we only have to beat the losing teams the rest of the way to top .500 for the year.
If we get Memphis early next week, the same. The big key is to get all the ones we should, the Minnesota, Sacramento (2), Golden State, and Clippers games. I’m pretty confident we’ll get another one or two, at least, somewhere else.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
BLAZERS ARE 2-0 WHEN BATUM STARTS!!!
Just wanted to post that. He sets the defensive tone and brings that “je ne sais quois” to the team that means WINNING. GO NIC!
incorrect
Blazers are 2-1 when Nic starts. He started against OKC and logged 35 min in a losing effort. Just sayin

by 






















