Game 58 Recap: Blazers 89, Jazz 93 (OT)
Long Story Short: After a brilliant, inspired, dream-tastic performance in the first 2.5 quarters the Blazers relax, then tighten up, then make a number of critical mistakes allowing the Jazz to push the game to overtime, the results of which were sad.
The Game
The Blazers went after this game in the first half. They went hard. Their defense was superlative. Utah is going to get a certain number of easy buckets from their halfcourt cuts. The Blazers held them to the bare minimum. Portland never allowed them to fast break. Portland got a hand in their faces on all of their jumpers. The Jazz were shooting over the top and covered. They missed copiously. The Blazers didn't allow them the offensive rebound. Portland threw their bodies around for charge after charge taken. It was beautiful. The result was a 38-point half for the Jazz. That's right, half...not quarter.
The Blazers played with equal energy on the other end. It's not like they got different shots than their norm. Yes, there were plays at the bucket off of sweet cuts and drives but the bulk of Portland's scoring came on the perimeter still. The difference was they were using those cuts and drives to draw the defense (quite effectively at that) so their jumpers were almost child's play. Utah isn't known for their strong interior defenders at the best of times and this definitely wasn't the best of times. Throw in a strong half from LaMarcus Aldridge and some offensive rebounds and you have a perfectly lovely 50-point half from the Blazers. 50 points isn't exactly record-breaking, but it looked plenty good when compared to the 38 the Jazz had.
Still, everyone sat on pins and needles waiting for the third-quarter to start. You knew the first six minutes could make the difference between a blowout and a dogfight. Lo and behold, the Blazers turned up the juice even more, terrorizing the Jazz, forcing turnovers, blocking shots, grabbing even more rebounds. By the 7:00 mark the Blazers were up 25 points, 64-39 to be exact, and only a major collapse could change the outcome.
What's that? Enron calling? Huh? Worldcom on line two? Oh no, don't tell me. Congressional Democrats holding on line three? Last episode of Seinfeld on line four? Subprime mortgage brokers on lines five through eight? Las Vegas realtors on line nine?!? They're all suing the Blazers for copyright infringement? Portland stole their act? Now you tell those folks that we had that schtick going back in 1999-2000, long before any of them even thought of going belly up! (sigh) Yes, tell the Cubs we'll pay. But for the rest of them, we'll fight this, I tell you! Well, for the first half of the trial anyway.
So...after the lead ballooned to 25 the Blazers got comfortable. You could tell it most clearly on the defensive end, where they let a few too many Utah players into the interior for easy buckets, almost as if it were garbage time already. At first it seemed OK because the Blazers scored themselves on almost every possession. The teams were simply trading buckets. In reality Portland was riding the last bit of momentum in their offensive game. The shots were coming farther and farther out with fewer and fewer good screens, cuts, drives, and passes preceding. The ESPN cameras caught Coach McMillan pleading with the guys to return to the hard-driving basketball of the first half but it didn't happen. The team was just too relaxed. The lackadaisical defense kept Utah in the money and the lead started to shrink. Then the Blazers had the opposite problem. They got tight. They started thinking instead of playing, aiming shots instead of shooting, attacking into impossible situations instead of sharing the ball. Credit the Jazz here as well. Their defensive intensity picked up a hundredfold.
After Portland's offense seized up and the players stood there staring at each other for multiple possessions Brandon Roy figured "To heck with this!" and started taking over the game. It started out slowly with a couple of jumpers but eventually he drove and cut, if not quite in his old form at least somewhat effectively. I haven't looked it up but he probably scored more points in the third and fourth quarters of this game than he did in every game since he returned from injury combined. Of course Roy starting to dominate didn't spark any extra ball movement or player movement. But realistically that wasn't happening anyway. At that point it was pretty much a choice between Roy taking over and Andre Miller continuing to take over. Miller was having a really rough time with his shot and couldn't score except from the foul line. Since Roy was hitting shots and drawing fouls it was a natural move. The Blazers would have been helped by the energetic presence of LaMarcus Aldridge during the third/fourth quarter transition time but he was stuck on the bench with four fouls. So Roy kept the Blazers afloat with occasional help from his friends.
That help became ultra-occasional in the fourth period as the bottom fell out of the offense completely. Portland scored its first field goal with 4:54 left in the period. The second came with 3:55 left. That torrid 20-second streak accounted for every shot the Blazers hit in the quarter. The remainder of their 10 points in the period (that's not a typo) came from free throws, some of which they also missed. The one guy keeping the Blazers going was Marcus Camby who kept putting rejections and offensive rebounds on the Jazz. He got more tips than a Hooters waitress at an accountants' convention. He'd worm his way towards the rim as the Blazers shot, rise, and swat the ball to a guard at midcourt so the Blazers could reset. Unfortunately the Blazers rewarded his hard work with extra misses. On the other end the Jazz were rolling offensively. Inside and out they started hitting. When they didn't hit they got the offensive rebound, even if the shot was a free throw. (SHAME!) Portland's last offensive play in regulation was a Roy drive with a dish to Nicolas Batum in the corner. Batum had been money all night but the change rattled out of his pocket this time and Utah had the ball with 5 seconds left, down by 2. Deron Williams missed a tough 20-footer but the Blazers couldn't rebound. Carlos Boozer snagged the ball, pivoted, and threw a hook over his head for the game-tying shot as the buzzer went off.
Overtime was a battle of individual defensive matchups. Portland put Batum on Deron Williams. D-Dub responded with 2 assists and a made shot in the first three minutes. Utah put Williams on Brandon Roy. Roy hit a three-pointer to open the extra session but never had a sniff at a clean look after. The only other Portland points came on a break where Roy dished to Rudy Fernandez for a wide-open three. Unfortunately that bucket still left the Blazers down 2 and Utah hit a couple of icing free throws while Portland missed the rest of their shots. Utah scores 10 points in overtime--the same amount Portland had scored in the entire fourth quarter--and leaves with a four-point victory and a season sweep of the Blazers.
As predicted this game rode on emotion as much as anything else. The Blazers had it all in the first half. The Jazz started the second half with none but once Portland put down the fiddle Utah happily picked up the tune and forced the Blazers to dance a pretty jig. The big numbers of the night were Utah's 50-30 advantage in the paint, achieved without much traditional posting of course, and the fact that the Blazers shot around 50% in the first half and ended up at 35.2% for the game. Utah shot sub-40% themselves but had just enough of an edge to overcome the extra attempts Portland got by virtue of those offensive rebounds.
It's hard to get wildly upset about the second-half collapse without being wildly happy about the play that got us up 25 in the first place. I'm not surprised the Blazers were able to whack the Jazz for 2+ quarters. I'm not surprised Utah snatched the game right back when Portland flagged. I'm not surprised that the Blazers relaxed or got tight or got swept away by the tide. That'll happen. That'll be a learning experience. It's those little mistakes that bother me...things that no basketball team should do, let alone repeat during the course of a game. The one that sticks with me above all others is one I've complained about before...one that typifies just how wrong things go. There are teams that go a whole month without giving up two offensive rebounds off of free throws. It's the most basic rebounding play in basketball, maybe the most basic period. The Blazers gave away multiples in the second half tonight. How in the heck does that happen? Lack of concentration? Lack of energy? Whatever it is, I think we need to go the rest of the season without seeing it happen again. It's always tempting in an overtime game to think of that one point that could have proven the difference in regulation. You can drive yourself crazy like that. Points in the flow of the game are one thing...missed shots, missed free throws even, blown defensive assignments. All of that happens normally and often during every game. But if you're going to just gift-wrap opportunities for the other team you deserve what you get. I don't think the momentum thing was necessarily correctable. But those blown easy rebounds and a few other silly moments should be haunting the guys as they go to sleep tonight. Those little things are what keep you right when the big things go wrong. They cost you a game you played well enough to win...narrowly.
Individual Observations
Brandon Roy played 34 minutes, most of them after halftime. He looked just as tentative as ever early on and picked up two fouls in the opening minutes of the game. Until it became apparent that Portland was in danger he simply passed up opportunities. But when he got down to business he looked like the Brandon of old, just not quite as confident and a fair bit slower laterally. That lateral slowness also ate into his defensive effectiveness big time. 7-15 shooting, 7-11 from the foul line, 23 points, 4 assists, but also 5 turnovers.
Outside of the fouls LaMarcus Aldridge had a great game. He was really into it. After a sweeping and-one across the lane the cameras actually caught him beaming, which is a facial expression we've not seen from LaMarcus this year. He played 33 minutes and was the mirror image of Roy, doing all of his damage early. He had 15 points and 10 rebounds before fouling out late in overtime. That's the good news. The bad news for Aldridge, Howard, Camby and the Blazer bigs was Carlos Boozer with 22 points and 23 rebounds plus Paul Millsap shooting 6-13 for 12 himself. After Utah grew a brain and pumped some adrenaline their big guys were basically unstoppable. To be fair the guard defense played into this too, as Camby in particular helped out frequently. But still, the Blazers got plastered by the Utah big men.
Marcus Camby was 1-7 from the field tonight but that's like complaining that Ben and Jerry's empty cartons don't throw themselves away after you've slurped up all of the sugar-coated deliciousness. The guy did his best, bringing energy all night and trying to make up for every alterable mistake that came his way. He had 4 blocks, 8 offensive rebounds, and 18 rebounds total.
Andre Miller played 40 minutes with 17 points, 5 assists, 4 rebounds, and 3 steals. He also converted 7-9 free throws. He needed to because his shot was bombing tonight, and not in the good way. He ended up 5-18 with some truly ugly attempts. In fairness he was trying to Brandon Roy us out of the situation he saw coming. He bumped up against Deron Williams pretty well. Williams had 18 and 12 but he didn't kill the Blazers singlehandedly. It's not like Andre changed Williams' game but at least he fought.
Martell Webster didn't get a chance to put up shots when the Blazers were moving the ball well in the first half and didn't get to play when they went isolation-heavy in the second half. He ended up with 2 points and a rebound in 14 minutes.
A huge part of the reason Webster saw no court time was the early explosion of Nicolas Batum whose offense returned in full form tonight. He hit that bail-out jumper like he was born to it, finishing the game 5-10. Batum is really good when the ball moves around on offense. He also got 9 rebounds.
Rudy Fernandez also brought a ton of energy off the bench, scoring 10 with 3 assists, 3 rebounds, a steal, and a block in 29 minutes. I mention the laundry list of stats because they reflect his game. He was all over the place. He shot only 4-11 but he was 2-5 from distance. His drive was failing him though. He's still looking for the foul more than finishing strong and the refs aren't rewarding him. Needs work.
Juwan Howard played 29 minutes because of LaMarcus' foul trouble. He looked out of rhythm, collecting 4 fouls to go along with 3 rebounds and 2 assists. It wasn't a horrible night but it wasn't one of his best either.
Jerryd Bayless got 2 points and 2 assists in 10 minutes. He only took 2 shots but he missed them handily. Also the defense just wasn't there. Ups and downs.
Dante Cunningham did well in 8 minutes, hitting 2 of 3 for 4 points, 2 rebounds, and a block. Dante provides a nice example for the young guys. No matter how long he's in there he does something. You may not always get shots but you can always play defense, rebound, and hustle. I seldom find myself regretting Dante minutes, be they 5 or 20.
Final Thoughts
Besides the general embarrassment and disgust over being swept by the Jazz, the Blazers just put a lot of pressure on their upcoming road trip. Neither the Hornets nor the Rockets are going to give up on the playoffs. Had they won tonight a nice road trip would have been fine. Now they could really use a great road trip. We'll see if they have it in them.
Are you the kind of person who'd attend the wedding of your ex-wife and her divorce lawyer? Do you happily go for thirds at the buffet that gave you botulism? Do you enjoy the seldom-practiced art of eyeball acupuncture? Then you'd be the type of person to visit SLCDunk tonight. (No truth to the rumor that "SLC" stands for "See ya Later, Chumps!" Although one could forgive Jazz fans for saying just that right now.)
Check out your Jersey Contest scores here and enter Tuesday's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
93 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My apologoes
I jinxed this game, I screamed at Nate at 6:57 left, right after he benched LaMarcus for getting that 5th foul, “what are you saving him for Overtime?!?!?!?!?”
Sorry everybody!
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
On another note
Being able to run the ISO late in games is important in the NBA, but running ONLY the ISO for nearly an entire qtr is a recipe for…well, we saw that first hand tonight!
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Especially when your main ISO guy is a step and a half slow
Roy gutted it out, his play was borderline inspiring considering his circumstances. Bottom line was that he is not able to bail this team out for a quarter at a time, and the blazers expected him to do so. Brandon Roy was a -21 on the night, the next closest was Juwan Howard at -1. Roy did all he could, but asking him to save the game for most of the 4th quarter was a brutal mistake when we had so many guys playing good team basketball early in the game. Roy can only do so much, especially with a bad hammy…
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
we should play good tea ball all game
and use the ISO as a dagger like the top teams do…
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
my main beef with the loss
The one that sticks with me above all others is one I’ve complained about before…one that typifies just how wrong things go. There are teams that go a whole month without giving up two offensive rebounds off of free throws. It’s the most basic rebounding play in basketball, maybe the most basic period. The Blazers gave away multiples in the second half tonight. How in the heck does that happen? Lack of concentration? Lack of energy?
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
been happening all season
the same thing happened in the Memphis home game, Z-Bo totally bullied L.A. and company for offensive rebounds off free-throws. blazers should be totally embarassed. as you say, its basketball 101, box out!!
As always great work Dave
I bet it was a weird one to right, a pretty great list of individual observations, for such an aggravating loss….
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Dave, 5-18 for Miller
5-16 would have been preferable though
I won't throw anyone under the bus on this one
but how does Webster not get any opportunity to score?
how does Howard play over Cunningham at PF? How does Pendergraph get no PT when the Blazers lost this game because of offensive rebounds (mostly when Camby and LMA were out).
How does Bayless only get 10 min when what the Blazers needed more than anything was someone to put pressure on the Jazz defense, and right when Bayless started to push it, he gets pine?
How does Miller get 18 shots (2 more than Aldridge and 3 more than Roy – the next highest), when it is clear as mud that those shots were EXACTLY what Utah wanted?!!!!!
These problems have one common denominator. Guess it.
Re: Bayless
He didnt look good running the offense. His best games have come when Roy was hurt and he was told to simply score score score. That isnt his role anymore, and it will never be his role on a healthy blazer team. I think he is having trouble adjusting so far in very limited minutes as a pg. I hope he picks it up….
RUDY > MJ
Thank you KP
I'll take a stab
even thoguh I know you are being a bit snarky…
No opportunity for Webster – Dave nailed it Batum was hot early, Blazers ran nothing but ISO late
Howard gets the nod for wily veteran moves, the refs eagle eyed him tonight though…
No pendy cause play did not stop, he was up and at the table, but play went on a while, by the time play was stopped Dante was up and in not pendy
J-Bay was not what we were missing tonight…
Miller took them…you almost could not blame him on the first few, they left him WIIIIIIDE open, but he should have stepped in a lot more than he did cause he was not hitting the long ball at all…
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
0-5
that will get you swept by the Jazz.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 12:33 AM PST up reply actions
re: Miller - I kept wondering out loud..."Why in the hell does it look like the offense is purposefully rotating the ball to Miller for jumpers?"
Never got an answer from Nate on that one. ;)
Let me think.
Hum, still thinking.
Wait, is it …… Nate?
Of course it is. One of your favorite whipping boys. The players stop playing and it is the coach’s fault. A real coach would have benched the entire team and gone with a lineup featuring two assistent coaches, the team trainer, a ballboy and the team mascot.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
stopped playing? Is that the best you can do?
How about – couldn’t matchup because it was Howard instead of Cunningham or Pendergraph?
Not only can Cunningham outrebound, outmuscle and outscore Howard with one arm tied behind his back, Pendergraph can do the same. Howard has had excellent contributions this season. But you cannot, under any circumstances, expect Howard to be effective in a physical game. Howard plays smaller than his size, and Fesenko is bigger and stronger, and Boozer just plain stronger. Howard was in when the Blazers couldn’t secure a stinking rebound – over and over again.
Miller never stopped playing. He just doesn’t have the skill set to shoot the mid to long range J, and he lacked the footspeed to get much else. We needed Bayless to break defenders down off the dribble.
The Blazers do not run plays for Webster when Roy and LMA are on the court. That is coaching idiocy.
So, yeah – there are specific reasons why the Blazers lost – and the wrong players playing defense and the wrong players taking the wrong shots are both of them.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 5:33 PM PST up reply actions
Portland is blowing their doors off, but that's obviously because of the players ...
… and has absolutly nothing to do with Nate having good matchups.
Then the doors fall off for Portland and it is all due to Nate not being able to figure out who should be on the court.
You have one thing right – there was a specific reason (or reasons). The players let up. They thought they had it in the bag and when Utah came back, they couldn’t turn it back on and then started tightening up, meaning they couldn’t buy a jump shot.
Exactly why is it you consider yourself to be better at judging what are effective matchups and who should be in the game than McMillan? Because that’s what you are saying. It has nothing to do with the effort of the players, is primarily the coach’s fault and I know this because I know more about basketball than he does.
Good luck with that.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
when does roy call a players-only meeting?
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
When he can't hold in his disgust over the rotations
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 12:13 AM PST up reply actions
Part of the problem with that legitimate complaint about rotation issues is the fact that the team seems to move the ball better when Roy is out at the moment...
…so far they haven’t found a balance on this issue. Roy is the only “bailout” guy on the team who has a good chance of scoring when the offense slows to a grind or stops altogether as we saw tonight. Unfortunately, it looks like it’s at least partially Roy’s presence out there that causes this since the rest of the team defers to him and then stands around waiting for him to ISO so often.
by mjswoosh on Feb 22, 2010 2:18 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
camby was awesome tonight
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
eyeball acupuncture. ouch
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
I am totally and completely happy.
I’ll take 2.5 quarters of amazingness against the Jazz. At the very least we know the team can still play some pretty inspired ball. I feel good about the future and I think as long as Roy’s leg heals we should make a little noise in the play-offs.
I played tennis yesterday completely pain free after suffering through a groin pull for the last month and a half. My injury felt exactly the same until a week ago when it mysteriously decided to heal itself. Injuries are funny like that. Hopefully Roy will be back to his old self pretty soon.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 12:19 AM PST reply actions
Yes, I absolutely do.
There was a 99% chance that we were going to lose to the Celtics and Jazz anyway. The only thing I take away from this loss is that the Blazers are still capable of playing great basket against good teams.
This is the worst Camby will play for the Blazers. his offense has been horrible and he looks out of sync. He’ll only get better. Hopefully Roy’s leg continues to improve as well.
The Spurs have a terrible schedule ahead of them. I think Houston just made themselves worse. The Hornets are still without Paul and I’ve seen Collison choke before. I can’t imagine the pressure he’ll feel when it comes down to the line.
So yeah, I think the Blazers still have about an 80% chance of making it.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 12:36 AM PST up reply actions
Count me in
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 22, 2010 6:53 AM PST up reply actions
We are barely in the majority though ...
.. after looking at Ben’s poll.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Yes, we almost certainly make the playoffs
I agree that Houston made themselves worse this year, it was a trade for next year.
New Orleans also has a tough schedule.
Memphis still scares me because they could go on a run again, but we’ve got a nice lead on them.
I thought there was only an 80% chance of losing to the Celtics and Jazz, I thought there was a chance we might get one of the two. Oh, well.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
uh, yeah
we lost in OT to the second best team in the west. teams dont play one way for long stretches. the blazer will figure it out.
i will be shocked if we miss the playoffs
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
by thomasikehara on Feb 22, 2010 7:24 AM PST up reply actions
I actually imagine we will too
just being a bit facetious…
but this ISO only business has to go…
This is not the same team we had in 2007-08 or even 08-09 anymore. Players have matured, new pieces brought in…
Everything has changed but the offensive scheme, it is almost identical. We needed ISO heavy options two full seasons aago, now we should be able to run the offense that put us up 25 last night into the fourth, sprinkle in the ISO for dagger plays…
This is not a knock on Roy, we need him now as much as we needed him two seasons ago, but we will not get to that next level so long as we run the same play every time down the floor in the 4th, it just won’t happen.
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
It's called Ws and Ls. 2.5 qtrs of "inspired ball" in the playoffs gets you a quick 1 way ticket to go fishin with Kenny Smith.
You gotta play all 4 quarters. As much as I like optimism, this is just silly kool-aid talk. This team has a major issue with blowing leads, and this has to do with a variety of factors, not least to do with the offense being designed around far too many ISOs and not nearly enough fast breaks.
Obviously we need to put it all together for four quarters. Obviously.
The fact that we looked good at all with a gimpy Roy and an out of sync Camby is amazing. I felt encouraged after the loss, clearly I would have preferred a win (Or an W as it’s “called”), but the fact that we looked good at all with how messed up the circumstances are is really pretty amazing.
The Jazz are basically the best team in the league right now. The game shouldn’t have been competitive at all. Small miracles.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 2:33 AM PST up reply actions
I thought we looked better in the 1st half without Roy in the lineup.
When the offense stalled in the 2nd half (as it always does) the rest of the team stood around and watched Roy.
This is a major offensicve balance issue that Nate has yet to figure out.
Roy did his best on a still bum leg and given the injury he looked great out there (his defense and the 5 turnovers, however, looked bad).
Camby was simply amazing. He was 2 inches from blocking Boozer’s shot that sent the game into overtime. At that moment I thought, “He blocks this we win…he misses the block we lose”.
One final note: where was LMA? Yet again he completely disappeared in the 4th and overtime. I know Nate sat him b/c of the 5th foul. But, honestly, shouldn’t a guy who is supposed to be our 2nd best offensive option take a few shots in the 2nd half? He took 2…count em…TWO shots in the 4th and ovetime combined. Missed ‘em both. That isn’t gonna get it done. We have a major issue with LMA and I have yet to understand what is wrong with him or why he pees down his leg in crunch time.
What's LMA going to do?
He doesn’t get the ball on the perimeter, he gets it thrown to him in the post. If the coaching staff decides to go with Roy in ISO’s then Aldridge doesn’t get the ball. If the apposing defense decides to double him then Aldridge passes the ball out to Roy or Miller and the process is repeated.
The offense has been centered around Outlaw and Roy in the fourth for a while now, it’s hard to break those habits. I don’t think it’s his fault really, post players tend to shrink in the fourth in general ( Bosh is the only big man among the top 30 in fourth quarter points). I think it’s more about the schemes than it is about LMA.
Roy looks terrible, but hopefully that will change. Either way I thought tonight was disappointing, but encouraging for the rest of the season. We won’t be playing Utah every night.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 2:58 AM PST up reply actions
He is getting paid All-Star money to be a scorer. Yet he shoots twice in the 4th and OT. This is a problem no matter how you spin it.
He is SUPPOSED to get the ball in the post, not the perimeter. You don’t want a 6’11" guy taking 67% of his shots from the perimeter as he does. You want him taking shots from the block and drawing fouls. The problem is that he shies away from contact, doesn’t look for his shot, and doesn’t know how to exploit a double team.
To be fair, many of the skills he needs to truly help this team when the defense collapses are things that he will need to work on in the off-season. Even still, the original point stands: it’s exceedingly frustrating to watch a guy who is supposed to be one of our go-to guys do NOTHING to help this team when it matters most.
Utah is talking of TRADING Boozer…yet he went out and SNATCHED that game for his team. He grabbed Portland by the throat and FORCED us to choke on it. What did LMA do when he had his chances? We’ve gone beyond the time when we can give LMA a pass for being so passive. IF he is going to be paid like an All-Star he needs to deliver when it matters. As it stands right now he is not a legit 2nd scoring option and is certainly not a guy we can look to to win games when it’s on the line.
Simply comparing Boozer’s aggressiveness to LMA’s lack of aggressiveness tells the whole story.
He IS supposed to get the ball in the post.
He can’t throw it to himself.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 3:07 AM PST up reply actions
Well, this is a legitimate point...er...to a point. hehe
making an entry pass into the block is a specialized PG skill. We have at least one player in Miller who is highly skilled at doing this. So,at least when he’s in the game we should be getting LMA on the block more often.
On the other hand, the coaching staff obviously has intimate knowledge of LMA’s strengths/weaknesses…and his proclivity to float to the perimeter and not get on the block.
Ultimately, LMA has to CALL for the ball and want it on the block. He doesn’t do that. So, the coaching staff needs to figure out a way to encourage that. LMA shooting 20 footers and scoring less than 3 points off FTs isn’t going to get it done this year or next year.
You ever notice how other teams don’t have a “problem” getting the ball into their bigs on the block? LMA has the talent to justify his top 10 PF status. IMHO he is a top 15 talent in the entire league. But his skillset has a long ways to go.
I can’t imagine how frustrated Nate must be about a lack of a post presence. But the offense itself does seem to be part of the problem.
I don't think the coaching staff want LMA in the post in the fourth quarter.
I think they want it to go to Roy. So I don’t necessarily think it’s all his fault.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 3:53 AM PST up reply actions
I guess it comes down to LMA's current skill set vs. his potential/future skill set
Given his natural talent, LMA should be capable of doing more than hitting 20 footers. Unfortunately, that is essentially his game at the moment. It’s frustrating to watch a guy who is nearly 7 feet tall with that much foot speed essentially play like a soft 2 guard on most nights. The coaching staff must WANT to put him on the block if they want the team to improve and have a shot at deep playoff runs in the next 2-3 years. We will need a post up presence offensively to do so. It just isn’t going to happen otherwise. But LMA isn’t at that point skill wise yet.
your anti-LMA bent seems to miss quite a bit
most of these “issues” are way over simplified and not really connected to how the game goes in general. LMA shoots long jumpers by design, but last night’s fourth quarter attempts were bailouts due to lack of offensive execution.
The lack of execution is because the scheme is too predictable – defenses do not have to respect the option to attack the basket off the cut (no roll to the pick). That is a coaching issue.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 7:57 AM PST up reply actions
This one hurts and hurts badly
It felt like a sucker punch to the gut.
I was LAUGHING at the bulls earlier this season. I kept saying “How in God’s name do you drop a 35 point lead? How is that humanly possible?”
Well I think I found out. I want to cry.
"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez
I DVRd the finland Swieden game
going to watch it and sleep…I recommend watching olympic hockey…it is wicked intense and fun to watch…
"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man
Teamwork
I think the most frustrating part of these last two games was seeing so many good players put the burden on someone else. With Boston they dumped everything on Camby to save their defense and it looked like nobody else took an equal share of the defensive responsibility onto themselves. Early in the season they did the same thing with Oden.
Tonight it went the other way and our entire team watched a guy they all know is hurt take on the challenge of being the entire offense for the last quarter of the game. Nobody stepped up to help him, not the other star or the role players or the coaches. I love Roy, he’s amazing and he does so much, but he’s not Kobe or LeBron or Jordan and even if he was all those guys had team mates who backed them up too. The Lakers (whom I despise) are great because they don’t put the burden on their best guy to do all the heavy lifting, it’s an option and wins games but it’s not the only way that team can win.
Tonight makes me worry looking forward, not because we don’t have talent, but because this team shuts it down and then looks to one guy to bail them out. That’s not how good teams win and it shouldn’t be the only way a team knows how to close out a tough game. This isn’t a team of starry-eyed kids anymore, that excuse is done and I hope the young guys are going to bed tonight with the lesson of this game seared into their minds. You don’t win games in the NBA by taking plays (or quarters) off and expecting someone else to do your job for you.
It is conceivable we need a new offensive system
Which means we may need to replace the coach.
That isn’t going to happen for at least 2 more seasons. Nate will get a pass for this season due to the injuries and so we can see if the current system will allow players to develop and chemistry to occur. And to be fair, Nate has done a great job in the W-L department with so many devastating injuries.
However, it is starting to appear his offensive scheme doesn’t fit the personnel we have. It is built around Roy in the half-court set, but the rest of the team seems to play better when we are more uptempo and fast break more often.
This is not a “lost season” since we did gain valuable experience for the rookies and other developing players. However, it will most likely be a quick exit in the playoffs even with Camby added to the fold.
So, we are in “hurry up and wait” mode for next season with the high hopes that Oden and Pryz can return and STAY healthy and perhaps the guys can gel in this system. If that doesn’t happen I suspect talk about replacing Nate may start to get serious at this time next year.
freethrow rebounds
I was at the game and on the critical freethrow rebounds you could see that Boozer and Fesensko were overpowering the much lighter Aldridge and Camby. Looks like they could have done it all game if they wanted.
People don’t talk about weight and strength much but it makes all the difference in certain rebounding situations.
Boozer kept jumping in the key early
During free throws. You could see lamarcus getting frustrated with this. Camby should have been next to boozer during free throws.
by Rockys' on Feb 22, 2010 1:42 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
This was exactly my point when many people were hailing Camby as the savior.
I love Camby. He played great against Utah. However, he is not a strong side defender or a meaty rebounder who can bang with the stronger 4s and 5s.
Without Camby we lose this game by 30 points.
He isn’t the savior, but he’s the next best thing.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 2:34 AM PST up reply actions
I wouldn't go that far. But I do think we lose by a bigger margin yes.
Still, I’m beginning to wonder why Nate isn’t more radically modifying his system to fit the personnel we have healthy.
We are NOT currently built for a half court game. Aside from Roy, ever other player on this squad is better in an uptempo, hustle D, fast break offense. Even our “bigs” such as Camby and LMA are not bangers and NEVER will be. Yet, we continue to run the same slow it down offense most of the time that we would run if we had a healthy Oden in the game.
I love Nate. And believe he’s done a great job with all the injuries. But I don’t understand his unwillingness to change things up given personnel changes.
And as an addendum to your comment about Camby's play and us losing by 30 without him...
…he played great within his skillset. But neither he nor LMA have the body type or skillset to handle Boozer. We played into Utah’s strengths tonight, not ours. That’s a coaching mistake more than anything.
Pendergraph instead of Howard woulda saved 2-3 offensive rebounds and potentially the game
right kind of player to bang with Boozer/fesenko
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 7:51 AM PST up reply actions
This game looked so good.
Until the end of the third. I hope for the good of all that is good we don’t run into the jazz if we make the playoffs. I would rather play the lakers first round than the jazz. Anybody else?
by Rockys' on Feb 22, 2010 1:40 AM PST via mobile reply actions
You think there's a 30% chance Boozer is out injured?
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I think it would be closer than a sweep though.
We can’t beat the jazz
by Rockys' on Feb 22, 2010 1:45 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
A special no thanks to
1120 am out of eugene. They cut out before the end of overtime. I live many miles out of the state so I guess I could’ve been getting another station, but I’m pretty sure they didn;t want to preempt “Coast to Coast with George Noory” by brodcasting Blazers over time.
So I just got the crappy news.
Jezz.
LMA took 2 shots in the 4th and Overtime combined...missed both. WTF???
He jacked up a 20 footer from the right baseline in the 4th…clank. And then jacked up a 20 footer from the free-throw line extended in overtime…clank.
I’m curious why more people aren’t making note of this disturbing trend of LMA peeing down his leg in crunch time, especially in big games.
As usual, his stat line looks fairly good in the box score…so if you don’t pay attention to his end of game disappearing acts nearly every game you wouldn’t think there was a problem at all.
Isn’t this a problem considering he is supposed to be our 2nd best offensive option?
This team NEEDS LMA to bring it every single night for FOUR quarters and over time. And yet he doesn’t do anything to actually bend the will of the game to our favor when it really matters.
Big men scoring in the 4th quarter and LaMarcus Aldridge.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 3:01 AM PST up reply actions
Spare me
LMA only took two shots because they weren’t passing him the ball. You expect him to dribble it up court himself, take on the defense, and score?
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
That's a great article. But even if it somewhat ameliorates LMA's scoring issues, it doesn't account for all of the problem.
In particular, take a look at how many points off free throws that other top 10 PFs score compared to LMA. You’ll see a distinct gap between LMA and other inside bangers, which is a major problem in close games, especially in playoffs (or playoff style games like this one).
Also, scoring stats don’t tell the whole story. Rebounding, defense, and general hustle are also part of the problem for LMA. A simple eye check is all we’d need to discern the difference between what LMA did in the 4th and OT vs. what Boozer did. Boozer took that game by the throat. I just want to see LMA do that ONCE.
Taken from the article you posted...
“Also notable, Aldridge is the lowest scorer of the group in the 4th quarter”
Meaning, even when we narrow it down to PFs he is the lowest scoring PF in this study group.
When you throw a noticable lack of defensive effort and hustle in crunch time it is troubling, no matter how you slice it.
I didn't see him do anything that was super troubling.
It just looked like all the offense was going through Roy. That’s the coaches decision. LMA is who he is for better or worse.
Also, the decision to give him that contract was probably based on the hope that he would work well with Oden occupying the area around the basket. We won’t know his value to the team until we see everyone healthy.
Batum brings the doom.
by The Running Man on Feb 22, 2010 3:19 AM PST up reply actions
When your 2nd option takes only TWO shots in the 4th and OT that IS the problem ;)
From the article:
“Still, the majority of these bigs saw small drops in their scoring production, maintained a similar scoring rate, or even improved their scoring rate [in the 4th]. Also interesting to note that the two players who are normally attributed to be most similar to LA’s game offensively, Bosh and West, essentially maintained an identical scoring rate during the 4th as compared to their performance over the rest of the game.”
As an aside, Bosh scores 7ppg from the FT stripe, compared to 2.7 for LMA. This is a HUGE discrepancy and a major problem for a PF who is supposed to be a scorer.
As for the article, the summary he puts at the end ignores the fact that 1) Bigs who get the ball on the block in the NBA don’t usually have their numbers called…they get their scoring opportunities off of 1) rebounds and 2) as a 2nd option within the flow of the Offense. In other words, the ball might be entered into LMA on the block with the idea that he has the OPTION of swinging it to Roy on the wing or try to exploit the D for a turnaround jumper or a drive for a layup/dunk.
The problem with this when it comes to LMA is that he doesn’t have any reliable post moves and he can’t handle the ball well when he faces the hoop. So, what LMA does well – shoot 20 footers – only comes in handy once in a while.
If LMA had post moves and/or a handle facing the hoop, he WOULD score more in this offense in the 4th. But if he’s not hitting 20 footers he isn’t generally effective.
Ultimately, this article proves exactly what I was saying. And it also brings up an earlier point that our offense needs to be modified. If LMA’s number isn’t getting called late in games and that can account for some of his scoring dropoff, then that is a system problem and needs to be addressed. He needs to be coached up and PUT ON THE BLOCK more often to draw fouls and score from the FT line.
The bottom line is that him taking TWO shots in the 4th and OT of a game of this importance is simply unacceptable and all the stats analysis discussions in the world don’t change that fact.
shot selection is a function of execution
LMA wasn’t passing up shots – and he was doubled constantly to force the ball out of his hands.
This one wasn’t on LMA.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 7:53 AM PST up reply actions
Obviously Sloan understands the power
Of the Dio era Black sabbath. I cannot think of another explanation for what has just taken place.
WHY on earth did Nate bench Batum for so long? Batum SHOULD BE STARTING.
From the end of the 1st half to the time that Batum went back in the game in the 2nd half, nearly an hour of real time had passed.
Next to LMA’s performance in the 4th/OT, this is by far the 2nd biggest problem with the game plan.
Batum's PT
He played the last 4:22 of the 1st, all 12 minutes of the second, came in with 1:07 left in the third, left after 4:49 of the fourth, was out for 2:04, then came back in for the remainder of the 4th and all of overtime except the last 11 seconds.
During the 11 minutes of the third when he was out, we were plus one, so it’s kind of hard to put this loss on Nate not playing him during that stretch. There were a lot of other factors in this loss.
The fact is that when we put together that run in the first half of the third to really open up the lead, Nic wasn’t playing. He also wasn’t playing when we gave back those points, but he was when we gave back most of the rest of the lead.
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I felt the same way about Rudy
Why did Nate bench Rudy in the 2nd? He was on fire for the first time in quite a while, and as soon as he sat down the Jazz made a bit of a run.
Wow
Where do I start with what happened last night? Let’s see Batum should have been playing more, Aldridge was horrible- not only does he not want to play defense he doesn’t look like he wants to really score anymore wither. This team quit playing. Thats all there is to it. Nate quit coaching the team quit playing when up 64-39. Embarassing. You don’t quit playing ever in the NBA teams are talented enough to come back on you. I’m such at a loss right now. WE ARE DONE!! SEASON’S OVER!
by CincyBlazerFan7180 on Feb 22, 2010 8:18 AM PST reply actions
That is exactly what people said after the home loss to OKC
It was as wrong then as it is now. The season is not over.
This team will be in the playoffs, 7 or 8 seed (unless one of the teams ahead of us folds).
Give Blake the MLE in 2010!
Farewell to #2 and #25, good luck to you!
#7 #10 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Save your fingers jscot
The Sky Is Falling crowd won’t listen anyway.
" It was as if the Suns hatched a fiendish plot to ruin John Wayne's movie career by casting him as a cowboy." - Dave 2/10/2010
Too bad some of it can't manage to fall on them.
I’m getting really tired of seeing self appointed experts telling us whose fault everything is, as if they really had a clue.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
What's a four letter two number anagram for "clueless"?
losing 4/5 at home is reason to scrape off the scab and cleanse the rot from the wound. Buy a clue (the clues are there, and the price is free even to you non-expert types)…
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2010 5:38 PM PST up reply actions
no need to get personal
" It was as if the Suns hatched a fiendish plot to ruin John Wayne's movie career by casting him as a cowboy." - Dave 2/10/2010
When they didn’t hit they got the offensive rebound, even if the shot was a free throw. (SHAME!)
There were a lot of reasons why the Blazers gave up the lead, and Dave has outlined these diligently. But to me the main reason came down to this: Boozer and Fesenko beasted LMA, Howard and Camby underneath. You could see it clearly on Utah’s missed FTs, Boozer was “caving in” LMA who couldn’t keep him boxed out. This is a simple matter of body mass and leverage (Carlos has superior lower body strength)
And it wasn’t just LMA, on the final play of regulation, Boozer pushed Camby in the back and grabbed the offensive rebound. There’s no reason to expect a whistle in that situation, the strong will survive and the Blazers’ big men are tall/thin but not strong. In the playoffs this weakness is magnified. Only Oden and Przybilla can correct this, or perhaps Pendergraph in time. When I suggest that Portland needs to add a beast of a PF/C to scrap for rebounds, remember this ballgame. You simply cannott win a title without them.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
playoffs
“No. We have zero chance of beating the Lakers in a 7 game series. I’d give us a 30% chance of beating the Jazz.”
I give us a 15% chance of beating the Lakers in a first-round playoff series and a 5% chance of beating Utah in such a series.
Blazers not "learning"
Dave writes “that’ll happen, that’ll be a learning experience”. Haven’t those words been written after at least 10 games this season? It doesn’t seem the Blazers are learning a thing from any of these blown games, games that were not taken from them but that they blew themselves. I see the same mistakes occuring again and again. pretty lame.
By far
the worst loss of the season. That was the kind of game that drags you down. I’m going to take this time to steam off and say nothing more.
Of all of the disappointing, demoralizing Blazer losses that I've watched and suffered through over the years
that Jazz game was one of them
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by 
























