Media Row Report: Blazers 77, Thunder 89
New starting lineup? Same slow start. The Portland Trail Blazers dug themselves a 15-2 first quarter deficit before dropping another home game, this time to the upstart Oklahoma City Thunder 89-77.
On paper, the Blazers' new starting lineup made for simpler match-ups with the Thunder's personnel. In reality, there was no matching the energy and determination of this young, talented group, who carried themselves from start to finish like a team destined for the playoffs. From focused warmups to the early double-digit lead to the intense defensive effort to their well-honed offensive gameplan, the Thunder made Scotty Brooks look like a Coach of the Year contender. They also helped their best player, Kevin Durant, look like a future league MVP.
Durant was the headliner as he usually is, tallying 33 points, 11 rebounds, an assist and 2 steals in just 34 minutes. "Last year when I played against him, he didn't play like that," Nicolas Batum told me after the game. "He improved a lot. His handle, his shot, he's the best scorer in the league right now."
Batum, who started for the first time this season, shared defensive responsibilities on Durant with Martell Webster. While the pair did an adequate job encouraging Durant to settle for jumpshots, the first time All Star caught fire in the second half, going for 19 on an array of jumpers and dunks that draw audible "oohs" and "aahs" from the Rose Garden crowd. It was the 25th consecutive game that Durant has scored more than 25 points.
Batum's self-assessment of his defensive effort was pretty harsh. "I didn't do my job on Durant. I just let him play. I didn't get physical enough on him. I just let him play. He got more than 30 points so I didn't do my job. I didn't body him, I gave him too much space." After the game, Webster seemed to indicate the takeover performance had been essentially inevitable. "He's been on a tear. He's playing good. He's putting the ball in the hoop. That's his expertise," Webster told me. "You just have to hope to contain that guy. You just have to have him take a jump shot that's contested and hope that he misses."
Batum was actually replaced in the second half starting lineup by Steve Blake, despite scoring more than half of the Blazers' first quarter points. Nate McMillan chalked that decision up to the team's flat start. "We weren't getting scoring," McMillan told reporters. "They packed it in on LaMarcus with that group and basically I felt like [with] Blake being on the perimeter we could make passes, we could execute some offense and possibly spread the floor." On the night, Blake went 0-5 for 0 points and 3 assists in 23+ minutes.
What was McMillan's halftime message to Batum? "Just to be ready to be back on the court," Batum told me. Indeed, the Blazers as a group must get ready quickly to get back on the court as they face the Suns in Phoenix tomorrow night. McMillan seemed more than a little bit concerned about whether his team would be able to pull itself together in time. He tried not to elaborate. "I don't want to go there," he said multiple times when questions were raised about the players' focus and attentiveness before this weekend's All Star break.
Later, he went there anyway. "Tonight we embarrassed ourselves," he concluded, shortly before sighing loudly on his way out of his post-game press conference.
Random Game Notes
- I can't ever remember an NBA head coach attributing a loss (in part) to his team's pre-game imbibing of energy drinks. See Nate's anti-Red Bull comments below.
- Five was the number of the night for Steve Blake. He went 0 for 5 from the field and had 5 stitches on his chin after colliding with Russell Westbrook's elbow while defending a first quarter jumper. His wife tweeted, "he's had 15 stitches in his lip, 10 in his head, 5 over his eyebrow, now 5 in his chin. He's pretty used to stitches in his head!"
- Martell Webster took a vicious fall during the second half and landed hard directly on his back. The team said officially he suffered a "back contusion." After the game Webster shrugged it off and is expected to be a go for tomorrow night in Phoenix.
- KP2 made it down for the match-up between his former team and his adopted team. Here are his five thoughts.
- I had a brief but interesting chat before the game with Oklahoma City's Assistant Coach of Player Development Dwight Daub. Daub oversees much of the Thunder's pre-game routine, including Kevin Durant's. What caught my eye was this bungee cord contraption. Astute readers with incredible memories may recall this picture of the LA Lakers' Luke Walton using one to warm up last March. The device is actually called a Core X System; here's the product's official website. The product consists of four straps (one for each arm and leg) and stretch cords that provide some tension. Players extend their arms while walking, dribbling a ball or catching a pass and the cords provide resistance. Initially, given the placement of the leg wraps, I thought this device was used to stretch out ligaments or muscles around the knee area. I was completely wrong. Daub explained that the device is really about working out the abdominal muscles. Each step or outward arm extension requires extra exertion from the athlete's core/abs. NBA scouts often talk about core strength as being a major plus, especially for guys who are trying to swing positions or who absorb a lot of contact while driving to the hoop. Daub says 8 Thunder players, including Durant, currently use the device on a regular basis. He said that he picked up the device on a tip from the Lakers coaching staff. As a team, the Thunder go through about 30 of them a year. Players are encouraged to take them home for personal workouts and many use them year-round as part of their strength programs.
- Kevin Durant's pre-game warmup routine had all of the best elements of LeBron James's without all of the worst elements. Although he wasn't particularly hot while warming up, it was a pretty captivating performance. His eyes were locked in and his manner was no-nonsense as he worked through standstill shots, game situation shots, and pull-ups off the dribble. He even practiced squatting into his sweep through move (a little trick that earned him 3 free throws during the game). His focus was continuous and he would react with frustration just about any time he missed more than one shot in a row. At one point, nearly two hours before the game, Durant punched a ball in disgust, sending it flying about 35 feet into the third row. He was really, truly angry at himself for missing a meaningless warmup jumper. After the ballboy retrieved it, Durant apologized for the inconvenience and admitted his frustration over missing the shot to the young teenager. You can imagine the ballboy's reaction. Shock. Watching that competitiveness and self-awareness side-by-side was pretty amazing.
- Perhaps even more amazing was the briefest of exchanges as Durant brought his workout to a close. As a general rule, visiting players and media typically rarely interact on the court prior to games. If they do, it's the media who initiates the conversation and not the other way around. Generally speaking there's a glass wall between the two groups, at least until the players return to the locker room and are briefly available for questions. An important corollary to this protocol: the better a player, the more likely he is to keep to himself and the more likely the media is to respect his privacy during warm-ups. That's just how things are done. So imagine my surprise when Durant saunters past Dwight Jaynes and me. We are, as is custom, watching his team warm up intently but without intruding. Out of the blue, Durant offers a "How y'all doin' tonight?" as polite and genuine as can be. It goes without saying that it takes a lot to impress Dwight , who has been to more than 1,000 NBA games in person. I would venture to say that even Dwight was impressed by this unusual and unsolicited politeness from one of the league's best. I certainly was. The determination, the personality, the likeability, the effortless scoring, the developing leadership. He is the real freaking deal.
- The one knock? Durant's Thunder have taken the mantle from the 2008-2009 LeBron James-led Cavaliers as the team with the most intricate and coordinated celebrations as they take the court. Durant has high-fives for every single person on the bench (awesome), four different choreographed handshakes (pushing it) and a teammate dusting off his shoulders (that's where i draw the line.). In his defense, they live in Oklahoma.
Nate McMillan's Post Game Comments
Guys wearing down
You know, it's hard to say after this game tonight. We were just flat. We weren't sharp at all. Mentally it didn't seem like we were here. 24 turnovers. We couldn't feed the post. We couldn't do anything tonight. Offensively we had a number of guys who had open looks but couldn't make a shot. This just wasn't sharp at all.
Guys afraid to step up late in the game
You can't lose confidence. You've got to be aggressive. When you have your shot, you got to take the shot. Tonight they just packed it in on LaMarcus, fronted him and zoned him from behind. The more shots we missed, the tighter they got. Forced guys to make shots. When you turn the ball over like that, 24 turnovers for 30 points and you're not making shots, it's going to make for a long night.
Kevin Durant
He played within the flow of the game, he didn't force anything and he had 33 points. I thought the plan was to deny him as much as possible. He made plays. They forced some switches a couple of times and shot over the defense. He was good.
Checking out before the break?
That's hard to say. 24 turnovers, your mind is not here. It wasn't one guy. We really could not feed the post tonight. We fumbled the ball. We had some open looks that we normally knock down shots. I don't want to go there with the team. But it was bad. It was bad effort for the team.
Concerned that it will continue
Well, I hope not. The thing was tonight, let's get out of here. We have another game, we need to get better. Before the game we kind of looked like we were flat. I saw a lot of cans of Red Bull up to guys mouths. That stuff looked like we crashed tonight. I mean seriously. We were flat from the start. I was hoping that that unit I put out there would give us some spark. We got off to a slow start. We weren't sharp at all.
Do these guys still believe?
I don't want to go there. Every night for us it's getting this team ready. Getting them to believe that they can. I thought tonight Oklahoma City certainly played like they knew they were in front of us and they wanted to stay in front of us. For us we've got to stay hungry. We're going to need everybody to be sharp. Tonight we didn't get that. When that happens it's going to be tough for us to win a ballgame.
Nic has had big first halfs, faded in the second half?
Normally he's playing off of LaMarcus or he's getting some easy baskets. He kind of plays in the flow, we're not calling a lot of plays for him so he's playing off of guys depending upon what the defense does, is where his shots come from. Tonight we're turning the ball over so guys didn't get that opportunity or have that opportunity to shoot the ball.
Why not start Nic the second half?
I thought that lineup, we were flat. We weren't getting scoring. They packed it in on LaMarcus with that group and basically I felt like Blake being on the perimeter we could make passes, we could execute some offense and possibly spread the floor.
Same starting lineup tomorrow?
Possibly. Possibly.
How do you get guys to snap out of it tomorrow night?
We have a game tomorrow night. The break doesn't start until after that game tomorrow night. You should be ready to go after the way we played tonight. It shouldn't be hard to get yourself ready to go. Tonight we embarrassed ourselves. You should have been ready to go tonight. But you certainly should be ready to go tomorrow night.
Start of the 4th. What did you think of that line up. Bayless, Rudy
We've got to give guys a breather. Miller had played the quarter. Bayless and Rudy, that could be a combination in the future. We have to look at that. We weren't able to get anything going. I don't remember exactly what happened. I think we had some turnovers and some missed shots with that group. We wasn't able to score.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Clear the Logjam
Get a center.
A positive attitude will not solve all of your problems but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort - Herm Albright
Keep the faith.
and a NBA-level offense
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Feb 10, 2010 6:37 AM PST up reply actions
and defense
what’s left?….Fast break points? (we’re dead last in the entire league) Points off turnovers? (but that falls under defense)
In fact let's just trash our team ...
… and start rooting for the Thunder.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
FTA
I can’t ever remember an NBA head coach attributing a loss (in part) to his team’s pre-game imbibing of energy drinks.
Actually, Wizards team officials made Caron Butler stop drinking drinking Mountain Dew all together in 2007. Apparently he was drinking a two-liter before every game and had multiple refrigerators at home filled with it.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2007/12/eight_outstanding_wizards_fact.html
i suppose it's a testament to how far I've fallen that I totally forgot there was a game on by the time I got home
and that I don’t really care that I missed it.
Anyway, sounds like I didn’t miss much. I love Nate’s excuses, but I suppose his legions of fanbois will once again put their heads in the sand as the team comes out and shoots (and misses) ten billion jumpers and gives a crap effort at home. Someday once the window has closed maybe someone important will actually wake up in that respect and wonder if the team could have taken the next step with a better coach, but I doubt it. Hell Ernie Kent is still employed in this state.
Anyway I think as the team’s outlook has soured, going from a team with heart fighting to remain a contender through injury to a somewhat mediocre and uninteresting team headed for a first round bounce at best, so has the atmosphere at this place. I find myself coming here less and less and enjoying the time hardly at all.
So we’ll see you next year, maybe. Peace out to those of you I enjoyed.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
Sounds like you
are well on your way to being a L*ker fan LeeRoy, they hate the learning process, don’t handle setbacks well, and love to assign blame and call it constructive criticism.
Enjoy!
RoadBlazer
Peace out.
We don’t need a fairweather fan anway.
LATERZZZ
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
by Arby on Feb 10, 2010 8:47 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Nate is ridiculous.
He takes Batum OUT of the second half starting rotation, because “they were flat with that lineup”. Did he not watch the first quarter? Batum was the only person scoring aside from Dante.
Sometimes Nate’s logic astounds me.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
Well to be fair
With Batum in the game OKC burned us for a 15-2 lead. However the rest of the quarter only Batum and Cunningham scored. So if he was worried about coming out flat, he should have had Batum and Cunningham in the game at the start of the second half (based on first half performance).
#52
by blazermaniac32 on Feb 10, 2010 8:19 AM PST up reply actions
Red Bull
Hasn’t someone (team nutritionist, if there is one) told these guys that caffeine and sugar is, at best, fool’s gold? It doesn’t really give you energy … it gives you the biochemical equivalent of stress. And your body adapts to it – to get the same buzz the next time, you need more and eventually you plateau out and more doesn’t do anything for you. But less of it and you end up with vicious headaches and nasty lethargy.
For those in the caffeine industry, though, it’s a perfect product: an addictive, legal drug.
Somebody ought to tell these guys there are alternatives. And explain just what they’re doing to their adrenals by slugging down this crap.
Duct tape makes you smart.
These are grown men
The training staff can only offer advice. Do you think any of Chicago’s training staff ever told Michael Jordan that a giant steak and potato meal isn’t the best idea a couple hours before a game?
Given that the training staff in Portland has done some fairly cutting edge stuff with things like sleep schedule, travel schedule, etc., I can’t imagine they haven’t mentioned that a bunch of sugar and caffeine isn’t a formula for success. It’s up to the players to follow through and execute, though. It’s sort of like blaming this loss on Nate’s coaching. These players are multi-millionaire professionals, not children. Most of the responsibility for what they consume and how they play is on them.
by superfly05 on Feb 10, 2010 10:48 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
so if the lineup is not scoring, the best thing to do is take out the only guy that could score?
Awesomeness (ô'səm-nes)
1. n. Something that inspires awe
2. n. Nicolas Batum
Brick wall, meet Blazers.
Seriously, this team cannot compete consistently without it’s superstar and it’s interior defense. They are wearing out. And, their offense has no flow if it is not hitting long jumpers. This was the time of the season where Oden was to keep us afloat. But he can no longer be considered a reliable option for this francise. Trade for a center, even if it takes Rudy. Otherwise, we are back into the lottery. The west is too strong.
Tipping the hand?
Bayless and Rudy, that could be a combination in the future. We have to look at that.
Is this because we may be without Miller or Blake come the trade deadline? Or just the fact that once Roy is back, both will be coming off the bench together?
I know I am reading too much into it but after last nights game, it is not Miller and/or Blake that I’d be trading. Those other two were atrocious (along with Webster).
Next year or the year after
when we have a three man guard rotation of Brandon, Jerryd, and Rudy, with some veteran or other to play spot minutes as the fourth guard and a rookie to carry the luggage and be a human victory cigar
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
LOL
Yeah, playing Jerryd and Rudy together was giving up. Nate had no hope that those two guys would make any good plays or anything!
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
The lack of a true PG
was painfully obvious when Rudy and Bayless were on the floor together. I’d rather see Steve Blake drive into traffic than either one of them at this point
Trading Andre would be like pushing off from your life preserver
so you can swim faster for that island that can’t be too far off.
"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener
That's got to be one of the best
metaphors I’ve ever read here. I’m always puzzled by people that want to trade away certain players with little to no regard for what can realistically be received in return. Generally speaking, if you’re the team seeking a trade, you are already operating from a position of weakness.
are albatros' really that big ?
that’s quite a wingspan. I like seagulls, that looks like supergull.
"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener
terrible loss, i had a total meltdown on twitter. so frustrating. too many outside lazy jumpers , lackadaisical defense and their inability to do anything without Brandon.
Nate’s comments on redbull are weird. Really, Nate? Sure fine the guys are tired but don’t call out a fine drink like RedBull and blame it for the loss.
-S
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
Lackadaisical defense?
Really? I thought the defense was excellent except for a couple brief spells in the 4th.
We didn’t lose that game because of defense. We lost because our offense stunk, because we had no penetration, no cuts to the basket, no quick passes to stress the defense, no nothing. Pass around the perimeter and put up a shot with a hand in your face. You are absolutely right about the lazy outside jumpers.
Somebody needs to tell someone that if you make three quick passes in a row, the defense will struggle to react in time, and that if you hold the ball for two seconds after receiving it and then pass, you give the defense time to adjust. If you actually combine quick passes with moving without the ball and off the ball screens, lots of good things can happen.
Most games are lost on the defensive end, IMO, but not this one.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I agree, except for
that Harden outburst. If we could have played defense on two or three of his shots, and shot even 30% from the 3pt. line, that game was ours.
Your an offensive oriented guy
I could leave it at that.
But you can’t judge defensive liabilities, when offense is always at the forefront. I could expel the first 10 minutes of the game 15 to 2 was it?. Where no defense at all was played….??? add those 13 points to the final score and we win by 2 points. I just don’t get why not scoring always gets moved to the forefront. Defense sets the tone for your offense to succeed. Good defense unifies you as a team and installs aggressive attitudes in your players.
So if the offense was ugly (and I agree it was) you should have no trouble correcting the issue by playing good defense for at least 40 minutes of the game.
The cuts to the hoop, quick passes are lacking because you are stagnated in your half court offense. Stagnated because you are not getting turnovers, rebounds, or getting quick transition off of your defense……It is always about defense in some form or another. The only way offense gets blamed is because you have chosen to play it that way. (it’s a signature, of sorts, for this team) Hopefully the defensive mindset will eventually endure. It will be the reason for this teams success in the playoffs and beyond.
I guess you knew this argument was coming from me. I have this stubborn philosophy about defense
I'm not offensive oriented
As I said, most games are lost on the defensive end.
Let’s look at it this way. I haven’t checked, but if you are right that it was 15-2 after 10 minutes, then we gave up precisely 1.5 points per minute. If you give up 1.5 points per minute every game in the NBA, you will allow 72 points per game, and you will win approximately 78 games a year.
You simply cannot shut out an NBA team if they play decent offense, no matter how good your defense is. The players are too quick, too strong, too skilled. The offensive player knows where he is going, and the defensive player has to react, and they are quick enough that the reaction time always gives the offensive player enough of an advantage that he can do something profitable. No matter how good your defense is, that is going to be enough to generate some scores if an offense plays well. The defense can only hope to shut down enough preferred options that the offense has to go to 3rd/4th/5th options, and in doing so, makes a mistake.
We had won over 40 straight games where we held a team under 90, and we held them under 90. That suggests to me that we played good enough D to win the game, but that the breakdown was primarily offensive this time.
Now, you are correct that a great defense will create easy baskets. We don’t have a great defense, we have a pretty decent defense. But it is a passive/conservative defense rather than an aggressive defense, so it doesn’t create many easy baskets. There’s a fanpost in the sidebar about this, and in general, I agree with it.
So I guess I could say that if we played a really aggressive defense that created more turnovers and fastbreak opportunities, we might have won that game even with abysmal offense. But that isn’t the same as saying that we played poor defense. It was a good defensive effort, just not good enough given how horrible the offense was.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
well,as you may know by now
My arguments are never generated out of a one game scenario… I rarely do the math. Because although they are factual, they can only be used out of context (or in context) when (or then) applied to the big picture.
I used the start of the game as an example or point of interest (and I admit it was a quick(but true) throw in to re-focus defense) It generally goes against my grain, because it can often be refuted or re-analyzed mathematically. But I also realize that setting the tone out of the blocks (especially at home) had a huge impact on the outcome of this particular game. IMO defensive tone is what it’s all about and has more significance than any offensive developments that may be of concern later in the game.
So my point will always be generated out of 48 minutes, weekly trends, months and so on. With the most weight put on the longest term. Since I will always take the stand that defense will be the difference maker for this team (and can be applied and proven in many different ways) I look at every game with the mindset that once you compromise yourself defensively, you have already reduced your chance of winning by XX%. ( many philosophies on this number, but most agree its a minimum of 50%, some as high as 75%). So It is my contention that defensive deficiencies (no matter what level or how long) can be applied to almost any loss. The Blazers defense compromises the team chances of winning, because it has never reached a high level of efficiency,consistency, and aggressiveness.. Bad defense can be exploited more readily because offense has the advantage of knowing what is going to transpire. Defense has to be fundamentally more sound, and also quite aggressive or energized to offset this advantage.
I don’t actually think we disagree on the philosophy, we just apply it differently. I have argued a bit before (with you) about offense vs defense on game outcomes. I’m very stubborn about defense, because I totally believe in the Red Auerbach/ Jack Ramsey philosophy of taking care of defense first and letting your offense play off of that…..granted the technology of defense has changed because of the 3 point shot and semi-zone defense….( i also played on a team that put defense at the forefront and literally the motto of the coach was “liability on defense is an ass-set on the bench”)
Just wondering
I know you don’t always get to watch the games, did you see this one?
Because as I watched, I thought we were setting the tone defensively. I thought we were really working hard, denying good shots, etc, but the ball just wasn’t going in for us, and we just started standing around on offense.
It was as if Nate had preached long and hard about defending Durant, etc., and the guys really bought in to that, but completely forgot how to play offense.
Maybe I read it wrong, but that was how it looked to me for most of the first quarter.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Additional thought
I did think we had significant defensive breakdowns, but they were in the fourth quarter, especially the first 3-4 minutes. Resolve those, and even with our offensive putridity, we’d have had a chance.
Which supports your general focus. But even if our defense had been good in the fourth, I still think we would have lost unless someone somehow had started playing a little bit of offense. We held them to 59 through three quarters — that is good enough to build a substantive lead in 90%+ NBA games.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I actually watched most of this game(sorta)
But it was quite an “interrupted view” (sports bar in Lebanon OR. & brother -in law’s birthday party) I missed many parts of the game, so my qualification on how the entire game was played,was dimmed by side-lined social activity (including gulping down several brews.)
So you kinda got me there…..IMO The first quarter was a big factor in them losing the game. So it’s probably a matter of a different take on the view.
I agree they couldn’t score either, but I am the one that always applies defensive breakdowns even to poor offense.(energy)
I can remember at least 3 scores (OKC first quarter )that were generally uncontested. I agree they were attempting to concentrate on Durant and left some others open. But the thing I noticed the most was that they didn’t “stop the ball”. (this is a fundamental part of defensive philosophy that is supposed to get a team into their second and third option and up against the shot clock.)
That said, it is only fair that your “more attentive” conclusion, would trump mine. So I will concede.
I actually concluded, early on, that the game was lost because they immediately lost the home court advantage in the first quarter and it was all about catch up after that. They eventually tied it at half, so then it was a “new game” for the second half. However, the visiting team is in a great position to steal the game ( the playing field is pretty level at this point)
I still will always hold on to defense as your foundation to fall back on, when offense sputters….in other words you can have bad offensive nights and still have good defense get you a win. If it’s the other way around your in deep doo-doo. Like Phoenix
I don’t like the Blazer’s offense(too limited) and I think the only way to correct it’s shortcomings is by intense high energy defense that creates turnovers and easy hoops. (something that will keep the defense on their heels) Your offense is always vulnerable, when it has so few options in half court sets and your opponents know whats coming. You show them the LMA pop out jumpers and supporting 3’s that aren’t falling you give them a better chance to shut you down.
We're pretty much in agreement
Except that I don’t think the only way to correct the offensive shortcomings is on the defensive end. It is ONE way, a very good way.
But ultimately, whatever you do on the defensive end, you should be able to execute a pick and roll well (we don’t), and you should always have off the ball movement (we don’t), and you should stress the defense by stringing quick passes together (we don’t). All of those things would improve our offense considerably, and they are things that any high school team is taught to do, but for some reason, we don’t do them with any consistency.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I suggest you re-read exactly what Nate said ...
… about the Red Bull.
Looks to me that he was simply making an observation – his guys looked lacking in energy before the game, a lot of them appeared to be downing caffine & sugar filled energy drinks right before the start of the game – a sign they perhaps were feeling tired or flat and it looked like they subsequently collapsed at the end of the game – which is a well understood result of trying to get a tempoary lift from either sugar or caffine.
I certainly didn’t see where he’s blaming the loss on the team drinking Red Bull, only that it was a symptom of what was wrong.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Yeah, I thought that was what he meant, too
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
should have gone with 5 hour energy instead
#7, #10, #25, #52,
by The Arkitect on Feb 10, 2010 11:41 AM PST up reply actions
I really cannot go to another game this season....
They’ve lost the last 3 I’ve been to (Utah, LAL & OKC) and not in grand fashion. Without Brandon Roy this team is literally like watching paint dry. I will basically sum up what I saw from the Blazers last night….
dribble dribble dribble dribble dribble, pass, get the ball back, dribble dribble dribble, make a lazy ass pass, OKC steals, fast break points for OKC. Either that or end up making a lazy ass jumper. Seriously, I cannot root for this team if they continue to play this way. There was no ball movement, EVERYONE made a lazy ass pass that was stolen and Rudy, Martell, Steve and Jerryd couldn’t put the ball in the basket, even if the basket was 10 feet in circumference. If this team doesn’t make a trade for some interior defense, even with Brandon coming back, they will not make it to the playoffs.

by 



















