Game 50 Recap: Blazers 98, Bobcats 79
Long Story Short: The Blazers play inspired, energetic defense for 48 minutes and Portland's second-unit finally provides some scoring punch allowing a relatively easy and fun romp over the athletic-but-frustrated Bobcats.
The Game
Portland continued its string of strong first-quarter starts in this game, a trend which has led to good things on multiple occasions. Tonight was no exception. From the opening moments the Bobcats were firing from the perimeter while Portland was working the ball inside off pass and dribble. The Blazers cleaned up several misses with offensive rebounds. When the early smoke cleared Portland had converted a couple of layups, a handful of free throws, a short Aldridge jumper, and a Bayless three-pointer into 12 points while Charlotte had managed only two layups for 4. Though the Bobcats did make an effort (semi-successful) to get the ball inside more they turned the ball over frequently in the process, leading to quick, easy points for the Blazers. Portland followed where opportunity led, running the ball down the court, firing quickly and confidently, spending relatively little time holding onto the rock. Firmly in the zone offensively, the Blazers passed fearlessly and everyone who had decent looks converted. On the other end the footwork was agile, the rebounding solid, and hands were busy. Dante Cunningham added some late-quarter help defense shutting off what few drives the ‘Cats were getting. After the first Portland led 29-19.
The second quarter saw even more hustle as Portland beat Charlotte to every loose ball. Rudy Fernandez and Nicolas Batum took full advantage, zinging the nets separately and finding some chemistry together. Offensive rebounding remained strong. The tempo remained brisk. It was apparent this would be a fun game throughout. The Bobcats had a late-quarter flurry but Jerryd Bayless responded with a couple of his many unstoppable drives and Portland went into the half up 8.
The third period saw LaMarcus Aldridge get into the flow early as the Blazers went with their traditional matchup-exploiting sets. LMA made the jumpers smooth and easy and even had a nice hook reminiscent of the great Andre Miller. Portland got a little sloppy with the ball in the quarter but, as they had done the whole night and would continue to do, they got back quickly in transition and refused to let Charlotte benefit from miscues. Near the end of the period Charlotte went with some matchup-exploiting offense of their own, running sets for Gerald Wallace and Stephen Jackson, trying to take advantage of size and height. It worked quite well but in the closing minutes Cunningham got busy in the lane again, Batum "D'ed up", and Rudy Fernandez leapt into the passing lanes. Under increased pressure and quick rotations the Bobcats retreated into mediocrity. Behind late scores by Miller and Batum Portland rolled the Charlotte margin in the period down to 1, entering the fourth up 7.
It was apparent that the Bobcats would need an early surge in the fourth to put the game in doubt when it had been largely controlled by the Blazers to this point. When Flip Murray drew a slapping foul on Rudy Fernandez 11-seconds into the period--a foul committed beyond the three-point arc which he followed with the obligatory late shot attempt, drawing and hitting the ensuing trio of free throws--it appeared they might get it. The lead was down to a scant 4 points. But the ‘Cats never got closer. With Charlotte watching the big threats closely the Blazers snuck through buckets from Juwan Howard, Steve Blake, and Dante Cunningham. By the 9-minute mark the lead was back to 9. When Fernandez hit a three 90 seconds later to push it to 12 the fun was back on. Batum went into full-defensive mode, he and Aldridge cleaned up the boards until there were none left, and the Bobcats barely got a decent look for the better part of 9 minutes. Meanwhile Batum started cutting like crazy on the offensive end and everyone was finding him. He finished all three of the Blazers' final field goal makes and the Blazers ended up waltzing to the 19-point victory.
The Bobcats wanted to bull over the Blazers tonight but couldn't manage it. Stephen Jackson did end up with a nice total of 23 but he didn't get anyone else involved. Gerald Wallace had 17 but was limited to 10 shots. Meanwhile the Blazers made like a swarm of stinging bees, playing great team defense, rebounding all over, and putting 6 guys in double figures. Portland zipped down the court and made for the rim more often than we've seen in a while. The unselfconscious shooting from recent games was back in full force. Add it all up and you had a game where there seemed to be no worries on Portland's side. When you think of the near-constant angst and struggle which have accompanied most of the Blazers' successes this year, let alone their failures, this kind of game was a welcome sight.
How good was that defense? The Bobcats shot just 40.6% overall, went 6-23 from distance, scored just 4 fast break points (Yoinks!), and had only 32 points in the paint. Meanwhile the Blazers shot 53.3% overall, 7-20 from the arc, scored 12 fast break points, and had 48 points in the paint. You could drink a shot for every fast break point and point in the paint the Blazers held over their opponents since the centers went down and still be able to roller skate on a tightrope after most games. Tonight you'd be on the ground (maybe under it) before you laced up the skates. Portland outrebounded the Bobcats too. Cheers.
Individual Observations
Nicolas Batum had another sweeeeeeeeet outing, combining defense, offense, rebounding, running, slashing, jump-shooting. 7-10 shooting, 15 points, 9 rebounds, and some great synergy with his teammates. Unless you see the games you can't really appreciate what Nic is doing. When you do see it, it's unmistakable. He doesn't beat down the door like Arnold Schwartzenegger or blow things up like Bruce Willis. He's got a license to kill like James Bond and he's every bit as versatile, suave, and effective.
Jerryd Bayless also had an awesome night, especially on offense. Forget the 4 turnovers...aggression and speed have their price. He destroyed the Bobcats off the dribble whenever the Blazers needed a bucket. It was like they weren't even there. 6-10 shooting, 15 points.
LaMarcus Aldridge looked pretty confident out there. His repertoire wasn't necessarily more varied but he got into his moves quicker and made them stronger. He looked like he was scoring instead of hoping when he released his shot. Part of that may have been the couple inch advantage he had on the defender. Part of it may have been the lower pressure in this game overall. Also the Bobcats couldn't spare extra men for him with everybody else in white scoring. Whatever the cause, he looked good. 8-13, a team-high 17 points, 8 rebounds, and some nice late-game defense.
Rudy Fernandez was into this game. It seemed to suit his style. He wasn't the best individual defender out there but he played the passing lanes well and came up with 3 steals. He shot 4-9 for 11 points but also added 4 rebounds and 5 assists including some pretty passes down the lane. I love it when Rudy can just play.
Dante Cunningham stayed out of foul trouble and got 31 minutes because of some crazy good help defense combined with the usual energy bursts. He looked a little Kersey-esque out there on the defensive end...the young Jerome who used to intimidate people. Now all he needs are a couple of thunderous putback dunks flying straight down the lane. The 2-block, 4-rebound line doesn't do justice to his efforts out there. He scored 10 points on 5-8 shooting.
Martell Webster looked better in this game than he did in the last couple. The free-and-easy vibe makes his release look better. He went 2-6 from distance, 3-8 overall for 10 points in 23 minutes. He added 5 rebounds. His defense wasn't bad but Batum so overshadows him in that department that it's hard to dwell on it.
Juwan Howard played 23 quiet minutes. We didn't need the Geezer Patrol much tonight as the pace was dialed up into youngin' territory. Nazr Mohammed had only 4 rebounds on the night. This is a quiet way Juwan contributes when matched up against non-dominating centers. Even if he doesn't blow you away he won't let you blow his team away either. 3 points, 3 rebounds.
Andre Miller looked content to set other people up tonight, letting Bayless and Batum handle the majority of the driving. When ‘Dre did go on offense he succeeded, shooting 4-6 for 8 points. His 10 assists, including several passes that just sliced the defense wide open, tell the tale of his night.
Steve Blake played 17 minutes, hit a three, and had a great alley-oop pass of his own en route to 5 points and 4 assists.
Jeff Pendergraph hit 4 free throws in the closing moments of the game for his 4 points. He had a rebound and 2 fouls in 5 minutes.
Paddy Mills got 2 minutes of garbage time and was credited with a turnover.
Final Thoughts
This kind of win inspires confidence. Hopefully that spirit will remain intact through Wednesday's game in Utah, win or lose. It was important for the Blazers to win this one and it's a promising sign that they won it so well. They looked like a playoff team and this victory points them in the right direction. Being in the Rose Garden tonight should have been a ton of fun.
Check out the Charlotte reflections at RufusonFire.
See your Jersey Contest score for the night here and enter Wednesday's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
73 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BATUM
I'm just not crazy about player nick names...
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Feb 1, 2010 10:32 PM PST reply actions
and he doesn't need a stupid nick name. he HAS "nick" for a name already.
see what I did there?
I'm just not crazy about player nick names...
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Feb 1, 2010 10:33 PM PST up reply actions
Batum, Rudy, Dante....
Wow. Add to that what we have injured on the sidelines, and our window is open…
when Travis comes back
what does that do to Dante’s minutes?
logjams R us
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
How strong was our D?
They took and made 3 times as many foul shots as us. They could have taken 5 times as many and we still would have outscored them.
by jiminut on Feb 1, 2010 10:43 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Rudy to Batum: The Pyrenees Connection?
I’m reaching for something.
Batum!
Looks like a starter for sure, sorry Webster but it’s time for you to shoot those 3’s off the bench. Last year Batum looked a little timid at times and rarely turned it on, now he looks full of confidence and he has everything to back it up. Great D, a solid bag of tricks on offense, and sky high BB IQ. Tonight I found myself wondering what this kid will look like in 5 or 7 years, he could be something really special.
wondering what this kid will look like in 5 or 7 years, he could be something really special.
Batum —> Prince —> Pippen
That’s Nic’s progression, if he’s already this good at age 20 and he continues on a normal growth curve…his upside is all-star bordering on superstar…with his feel for the game and BBIQ he could easily become a “point forward”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
It's nice to beat the teams we should beat
Also, Nic has been fantastic since he’s been back. Awesome to watch.
And Dante has a good game tonight too. I think he should get an assist for that Rudy putback because it was just that pretty.
Not really sure
there’s any justification to keep Batum out of the starting lineup. Glad he’s in there at the end of games.
Why not start Rudy in place of Bayless? What could Miller do with Batum and Rudy to pass to for a larger chunk of the game? Bayless would make a great off-the-bench energy player.
Rudy is an energy guy
He’s less consistent than J-Bay.
Batum may be starting sooner than you think (Dwight Jaynes thinks so).
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Nate said he'll wait until Brandon returns
he doesn’t want to keep adjusting the starting lineup. Roy likes playing with Frenchy, so I suspect that’s when Nic will “replace” Martell
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
The Miller, Rudy, Batum trio blew this game open in the fourth
I think it is obvious that both Rex and Webs should come off the bench. Less pressure for Webster, more oppurtunities for Rex to lower his head and do what he does…
RUDY > MJ
Trade for Dalembert
I would not mind having Roy sit till after the all star break and
ride these same horse’s,it wont make or break the season and might be best in long run
by southern oregon on Feb 1, 2010 11:01 PM PST reply actions
That game was a preview of great things to come
They weren’t at their best sure but we still beat down a hot team.
I am smiling without reservation after tonight, first time I’ve been able to say that since the Orlando game.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Gerald Wallace gets trapped between an Inferno
And pure French-born awesomeness:

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Rex uses his T-rex breath to blow over a very scared Felton

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
by skywaker9 on Feb 1, 2010 11:09 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
It's so satisfying that Batum looks like a budding star
and what a bonus Dante Cunningham seems to be. Defense wins… uh… lots of games.
ignacio
I personally think Rice's "Orange Juice"
Helped us win the game.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
mike rice’s in game hydration consists of “apple juice”, “orange juice”, and “cola”
by goblazers503 on Feb 1, 2010 11:51 PM PST up reply actions
I liked the girl's " Mike Rice is Sexy " sign...I think Ill make one that says...
" Can I buy you a drink Mike Rice…Or did they already cut you off? "
by TheOdenator52 on Feb 1, 2010 11:23 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Defensive Stats
I’m not a numbers guy, I don’t even know where to look, just curious if our defensive numbers have changed at all since Batum came back. Is there a way to track what kind of impact he has or how the team +/- changes when he’s out there? Every game we hear “What he does won’t show up in the box score” but there must be some data out there.
sample size
give it a few games and then the data will tell us more.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 1, 2010 11:46 PM PST up reply actions
Just look at who he's guarding
Wallace had a bad game, Dirk couldn’t hit a shot late. And that’s just the last two.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Batum on the bench!
Keep him there. Why?
Defense. Defense. Defense. Energy.
Our first unit already has a solid perimeter defender, in Webster. We’d have to put Martell on the bench, where he would still be solid defensively, however not nearly s consistent offensively. Thus far, Nic has been the better offensive player (since he’s been back). Our 2nd unit has how many guys who can score night in, night out? What? 0? Rudy can shoot us into and out of a game. Dante doesn’t shoot all that often. Blake can go cold for weeks at a time. Pendergraph? Are you kidding me?
Whereas our first team has Bayless, Webster, Howard, Aldridge, and Miller. Miller and Aldridge are fairly consistent, Bayless is getting more consistent. Howard does his job. Webster, as I mentioned earlier, is streaky.
Plus, on teh first team we have matchups to worry about. Take the Jazz for example. Can Nic keep Paul Millsap off the boards? Oh god, I wish he could. I really, really do. But, Millsap would eat him up, simply through sheer strength. Aldridge has a better chance. So, then Batum is on Okur? Maybe he can play him like Dirk. But, then lets look at the rest of the team. Miller or Bayless on D. Will. Not a fan of that matchup. Move Webster over, and I’m okay with it. Then we’ll just have to worry about AK-47. Cut off his lanes, and force him to take the outside jumper. I’m ok with that. But, I’d still rather have Howard being all shifty-like on Okur.
Then we bring in Batum and Dante, who if they can play like they did tonight, we’ll get great complimentary defense from both of them. D. Will gets multiple looks thrown at him. Have a great night. JP can handle the guys crashing the boards.
My main concern is that Aldridge can’t handle playing a Center position, and Martell can’t handle being a consistent spark off the bench. This makes both proposed lineups with Batum starting (at the 4 , minus Howard and at the 3, minus Webster) a liability in my mind.
Keep him on the bench for now. Maybe once Brandon comes back, and we can put Bayless back on the bench. But, for now, stick with what works.
(Insert something snappy)
Why wouldn't you want Batum guarding the other team's best perimeter scorer
from the beginning of each half, to help get the opponent’s “off” to a slow start?
The question re: starting SF will be revisited when Roy returns to the starting lineup. Roy likes having Batum alongside him, on both ends of the court
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
My main concern is that Aldridge can’t handle playing a Center position, and Martell can’t handle being a consistent spark off the bench. This makes both proposed lineups with Batum starting (at the 4…) a liability in my mind.
Ditto. LMA at the 5 and Batum at the 4 is a non-starter, unless the opposing lineup is small/skinny. Nate will stick with what has “worked” unless KP makes a deal. So I expect we’ll see
Miller
Roy
Batum
LMA
Howard
Then when Outlaw returns he’ll be back to playing the “4” (which isn’t great but it’s “worked” in the past)
KP could set up the roster up for better playoff success by dealing a few of his “assets” (pick ‘em…Blake, Webster, Outlaw, rights to Euros, Paul Allen’s money) for a defensive center at the deadline. Or, maybe if he gets blown away with a deal for Andre KP could move Miller
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Will people just STOP with the Miller trade suggestions?! Who do you think GETS the ball
to Batum, Rudy, Dante…etc…
it's not a trade suggestion, it's a hypothetical scenario
this is a trade suggestion
NOLA just lost CP3. Let’s say they offer Okafur for Andre and Travis. Would you take it?
That’s an example of the kind of offer that KP might receive. It doesn’t mean he will, or that he would take it if he did. I’m not “down” on Miller or “hoping” that he gets dealt. But I’m also not afraid of speculating that if KP gets a last minute proposal from a team that needs a veteran PG, that he shouldn’t be trying to improve the team.
If Miller isn’t around, Blake and Bayless can play PG. Will they GET the ball to Batum, Rudy, Dante, etc with the same acumen that Dre has? Probably not. Will Brandon Roy’s return affect how the ball is distributed, Andre or no Andre? There’s no question.
Miller is an important member of the team at present, and he may be around for another year, or two. If KP receives an offer for a player or players who he thinks will help the team more than Miller, both now and in the future, then he should make that deal. That’s all I’m saying.
I find it comical that Andre has gone from “malcontent” to “untouchable” in less than a month, in the minds of some Bedgers. There is a “price” for every player on the NBA market, and Miller’s trade value is less than Rudy’s, Nic’s or even Jerryd’s (contract+potential being the main criteria) But if a contending team has an urgent need for a veteran PG and is willing to “overpay” for Andre, then KP wouldn’t be the kind of GM the Blazers need if he dismissed the offer out of hand
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
one play that was kind of lost in the post-game highlights...
Batum was defending Jackson, who drove hard and made a pretty spin move to right under the basket but somehow Batum still followed closely him like his shadow. He tried to layup the ball anyway but promptly swatted away by Batum all in one motion. It’s an amazing defensive play but probably overshadowed by the preceding play which is Rudy’s putback dunk .
Pendergraphg had 2 fouls in 5 minutes?
He’s the next Greg Oden!
All kidding aside, I like Jeff’s intensity out on the floor.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ton of fun
Loved being in the Rose Garden for this one. Also got to go on the floor after this one and shoot around for a bit through the steal of the game tix. 1-3 on threes for me tonight. Plus a photo of my friend lying on the center court logo.
Too many people on the Batum bandwagon these days...
Starting to get claustrophobic!
It is nice to see Batum progressing right on schedule, even with losing half the season. I made a bold prediction at the end of last season that he should be our third most important player behind Roy and Oden by the start of ‘10-’11. (and that prediction is still looking pretty good) With his sense of offensive spacing and ballhandling skills, he would excel in point forward role much like his idol, Scottie Pippen. Of course, Pip could play some excellent D as well, much like Batum.
Still, I think I want to bring Batum from the bench as he gets to use more of his tools playing along with the bench unit, much like Travis did. Only thing is that I’d bring him in sooner than the 2 minute mark in the first quarter, but coach is still probably limit his minutes due to his recent recovery from the shoulder injury. As long as his minutes get ramped up as the season moves along, I am fine with that.
"I think he’s been doing some good things. I think he’s been doing some good things. He’s had to play a lot of minutes lately with Blake being out. I think he’s been doing some good things." -Nate McMillan
Regarding the caption on the photo
I hope if what you say is true about a Batum statue, that they find a better photo, that’s the face I make when I floss.
I loved the fourth-quarter lineup...
Miller, Rudy, Dante, Batum, and Aldridge.
That group did some serious damage on both ends of the floor, and was a lot of fun to watch.
I like to have Dante in there with Batum and Rudy and Miller...WHENEVER they are together...
Right now I think the end of the game is more important than who is in at the beginning. Dante and Batum play VERY WELL together….also Miller with those two..and Rudy…Miller feeds them the ball…LOVE IT
Also tih…you probably won’t admit it..but I think it was pretty cool that Miller didn’t try to be the big ball hog…try to do anything close to what he did the previous game…just did what the team needed…passed the ball and ran the court very well. You may have to start hating him a little bit less. Also since you can’t stand KG..did you see Miller knock the ball out of KG’s hands and then smile…in the game against the Celtics…it was after the play was finished..and apparently it’s something KG does quite a bit…loved the PAYBACK…
they looked like a playoff team
“They looked like a playoff team” was a good way to put it.
The thing I liked about this game is I felt it showed that this team has enough talent to be successful the rest of the season.
I have been figuring they Blazers would play about .500 the rest of the season, wind up with about 45 wins for the year, and be right on the hairy edge of making or not making the playoffs.
With what these guys showed yesterday, especially Nick and Dante, and the fact that Roy is still out injured, I think they still have a shot at a 50 win season.
Dave I think Rudy heard you on the podcast. You see that nice tip dunk and reverse alley oop?
I just have to say, Batum is amazing. Everything this guy does is effortless. It’s like, dude, what are you going to be like when you are playing your hardest? Crazy.
L*kers
“Need him back to keep up the streak vs. the Fakers”
Blazers can beat the L*kers in the Rose Garden Broy or no Broy.
We all know Batum needs to start. When I'm watching the starting group I'm just thinking, great, when is Batum going to
get in so we can start winning. Nate needs to stop being so strict to his rotations and put the best players out there. Including Bayless.
I thought the same thing last night about Batum
I couldn’t wait for him to get off the bench.
yep
especially when Webster misses a few shots and makes a few egregious turnovers, like during the first half last night?
Patience, #7 and #88 go together like peanut butter and jelly
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
No love for Blake?
I’ve been an adamant Blake critic (Rudy can do all Blake can do, right?), but Blake played some pretty good point guard, last night.
I still hate it when he is in for players like Rudy/Martell, but when he is backing up the point (and hitting his shot, driving for layups on occasion) then he is a useful piece of the puzzle.
Ultimately, Blake isn’t better than option A or option B, but he isn’t a complete flake.
I have to disagree my friend
Blake is ok, but if he is not hitting his shot then he really doesn’t do much else.
He had a few nice assists last night, but also 3-4 terrible turnovers. It also seems like our lead tended to evaporate as soon as Blake took the helm, and then ballooned once Dre or Bayless came back in. They guy has his moments, but I would say that his role should be downsized more and more with Bayless and Mills waiting in line.
Batum is terrific, and I like how they are using him right now. The 2nd unit with him and Fernandez is a great combo and I feel like he is good coming off the bench right now.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Dante Cunningham is a very good player. I hope he plays for us for a long time
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
Blake last night
He had a few nice assists last night, but also 3-4 terrible turnovers.
4 assists in 17 minutes. 2 turnovers. The “Blake is bad” myth continues.
It also seems like our lead tended to evaporate as soon as Blake took the helm, and then ballooned once Dre or Bayless came back in.
In the first half, he came in after 8:22. The lead was 7. He played the rest of the first quarter, and the first 2:45 of the second quarter. When he went out, the lead was 7, unchanged from when he came in.
In the second half, he came in after 6:56. The lead was down to 6. He played the rest of the third, and the first 5:27 of the fourth. When he went out, the lead was 11, up five from when he came in.
Mills has shown nothing to suggest he should get minutes from Blake or anyone else. I would agree that you have to play Bayless and Rudy, and Blake’s minutes will and should continue to get squeezed, especially when Brandon comes back.
But Blake had a solid game for us last night in limited minutes, and you are mistaken on both of your criticisms.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
but the lead went to almost 20
in the last half of the 4th when he was out, and momentum was killed in the first half when he came in, thus no change in the lead.
So maybe he didnt “kill us” as bad as I thought, but I wouldnt say he did all that much to help.
The guy can shoot, and certainly has a role on this team.
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
The lead went to almost 20 because they folded
Blake and Rudy did a brilliant job in the 3rd/4th. If your subs can even maintain a lead, it lets the starters get all the rest they need. Every minute that passes with Andre on the bench and our lead being maintained is excellent, he’ll come back even stronger if they start to make a run.
In this case, our subs extended the lead.
Bedge is a crazy place. In the first half, our sub PG maintains the lead, and in the second, extends it, while our starter gets to rest, and people here complain. Do you know how many teams would love to have a second string PG who doesn’t lose a lead?
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
Blake is the reason we didnt lose the lead?
I would hardly call 33% shooting, 4 ast & 2 turnovers the reason for success. I would probably put more of that on Nic playing outstanding, DC shooting near 80%, and Rudy finding his rhythm again. Blake was pretty average, which he has been for about a month.
He can handle the ball, hit the open 3, and usually makes smart decisions but thats about it. He has trouble running the fast break, doesnt get to the paint very often (and when he does, he just dribble is back out wasting 5-6 seconds off the shot clock), and isnt very aggressive defensively.
Im not saying cut the guy, but unless Bayless is playing TERRIBLE (which he can do sometimes) I would rather play the Bayless/Miller combo at PG and steve about 12-14 a night.
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
recall the point of the original post, and the initial rebuttal to your rebuttal
Blake, when on, is a serviceable backup. Miller and Bayless are better. Blake was active and effective in the Charlotte game, under conditions where we have seen him fail (heavy pressure, tight defense). He was not a turnover machine and he did not give up leads – as you alleged.
Blake’s play helped set the tone for how the Blazers dealt with pressure (they attacked!!!!) In this regard, he outplayed Miller early. Miller got it going later, and Bayless not getting any burn late in fourth was unconscionable.
However, Blake still deserves kudos for doing something unexpected, and heretofore believed outside his skill set – he broke a high-pressure system and rendered it impotent.
Seems as if you are putting a lot of effort into hating Blake's defects.
It would be much better spent supporting him.
A positive attitude will not solve all of your problems but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort - Herm Albright
Keep the faith.
Upcoming Schedule...
So our next five are against Utah, San Tone, OKC, LA, and Phoenix?
Crap, thats tough. I just hope we can win 2 out of 5.
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
Phoenix is struggling
and if Brandon is back and up to speed, I’d like our chances in that one. Also the home game against OKC. The Spurs are hard to read, they are bad against winning teams, but every once in a while come up with a really good game.
I wouldn’t be shocked if we win only one. I also wouldn’t be shocked if LA proves they can still lose in Portland, and we win 3 or 4.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
The team always seems to do
one game better than what you think would be average. 1 win in this stretch would be bottom of the barrell, 2 would be acceptable given the schedule. Therefore the smart money is on 3 wins.
—Dave
Rose Garden was flat last night
I was at the game, and it was great as far as the Blazers play but man, the arena was really flat for some reason. The crowd just wasn’t getting into it. Not loud or fun at all. That was probably my 12th game of the year and it was the lamest crowd yet. Hard to figure for such a well played game by the Blazers from start to finish. Great win though and nice to see them really pull away in the 4th.
They were bored
They like the thrill of watching the Blazers blow a lead and have to try and pull out the win.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I was not at ALL bored! Loved watching Nic and Dante's and Rudy's play! The crowd was
quieter than usual and I noticed the “music” that was played was not good…too many drum beating deals…what was THAT all about??? Whoever was in charge of that part of the game didn’t do as good a job as they usually do!!!
Its called we were playing Charlotte
They’re only been a franchise for what, six years before this season so there is no history at all really. Its like when Oregon or Oregon State plays say New Mexico in football, people show up but they’re not going to get into a game against a team they have no history with and is not a big name.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
the BE night
was a week too early
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by 




















