Game 33 Recap: Blazers 100, Jazz 89
In a Nutshell
The Blazers ride good performances by their main starters--rebounding, running, and attacking where the Jazz can't stop them--to out-Jazz the Jazz and walk away with a relatively easy victory.
Game Flow
Portland's plan out of the gate was a solid and familiar one: run out, look for the early shot, but if it's not there go to LaMarcus Aldridge and let him spin around relatively weak Utah frontcourt defenders for short-range hoops. The Blazers looked so good executing in the first period that, were you to cover both sets of uniforms, you might guess that the Blazers were the Jazz and vice-versa. As the period progressed Portland pasted cut after cut on Utah's flat-footed defenders, with both Aldridge and Cunningham burning the Jazz down the lane for quick passes and hoops. Aldridge was also active on defense, helping out in the paint with alacrity. Ever since he's been here we've talked about LMA's defensive strength being off the ball where mobility is prized and quick-twitch doesn't matter. He lived it out early in this game. The Blazers built a 21-13 lead by the 4:30 mark in the period and looked to be cruising. Then, in another familiar story, Portland's second unit hit the floor. The defense immediately died. The Jazz started hitting open shots, scoring in the paint, and parading to the foul line. The Blazers also scored thanks to Aldridge and Andre Miller, but a 2/3 court banked heave by Deron Williams at the buzzer brought Utah to within 4 as the period closed. 29-25 Portland was still a good result, but not indicative of the Blazers' play in the period.
The second period started with more second unit. Now the offense died. Portland would not hit a field goal for the first 6 minutes of the quarter, scoring only 2 points in that span. Fortunately the Jazz reserves were nearly as incompetent, else Portland would have been working uphill the rest of this game. Once the starters returned the ship righted. The Blazers again mixed paint points and free throws with a few open jumpers. Only turnovers marred the stretch, but they didn't end up costing too much. When the halftime horn sounded Portland had increased its lead by 1, 46-41.
The Blazers played professional ball in the third period, getting after the game immediately and looking to put Utah away. They again ran out behind great rebounding. On both ends of the court the looked two feet taller than their Jazz counterparts. Utah couldn't get inside without getting hassled or outright stripped. Utah couldn't get a rebound. They settled for longer and better-covered jumpers, shut out of the interior entirely. The Jazz made a run late in the third but a couple great Wesley Matthews buckets shut them down. The Blazers scored 33 in the period to Utah's 27, leading by 11 heading into the fourth...a period in which the two teams played to a standstill. That ended up plenty good enough and the Blazers walked away with a 100-89 victory.
Notable Developments
Continuity is making up for talent as this particular incarnation of the Blazers grows together. They've got some chops defensively between Matthews, Marcus Camby, and Nicolas Batum. Not having to take the ball out of the enemy net every play makes a quicker tempo possible and makes the whole game look smoother. They're also looking for each other on offense, seemingly delighting in a great pass as much as a made shot. We're clearly seeing the best point-guard play from Andre Miller than he's evidenced as a Blazer. Everything he does looks in time with the game. Even his mistakes, which are relatively few nowadays, come off of positive attempts instead of confusion. Combine that with the best play of Aldridge's and Matthews' careers and you have some nice outings. Portland's vulnerability right now lies solely in the prospect of a good defense taking away a leg of the offense, likely causing the whole to crumble from imbalance. Contrast that with a season ago when defenses couldn't take away everything but the Blazers couldn't get into many of their multiple options smoothly either. You can debate on which is better. If only there were a way to combine the two the Blazers would be cooking with gas.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge beasted out for 27 points on 10-18 shooting plus 7-8 free throws. The percentage was good, the extra points were good, the offense was good. The boxscore says 3 rebounds but ignore that tonight. LMA was all over the place on defense. Rebounding was somebody else's job.
Wes Money led the team with 30 on 9-16 shooting, 4-10 from distance, 8-9 from the line. Hitting threes and free throws are good for him and the Blazers. He also had 4 steals, 3 rebounds, and 3 assists...just the kind of game you want to see from him. It seems like every time he scores 20 with some extra stats the Blazers win easily. I'm not sure yet if that's cause or symptom, but I'll take it.
Andre Miller had 10 assists plus 16 points on 6-11 shooting and 4-5 free throws. He pretty much matched Deron Williams' contributions and looked awesome doing so. When you read "continuity" above, think heavy doses of Miller.
Why didn't the rest of the Blazers have good rebounding numbers? A. The Jazz only missed 32 shots tonight. B. Marcus Camby grabbed 17 of those rebounds, leaving just 15 to be split between 10 other players. Camby had 20 boards overall plus 2 steals, 2 blocks, and 5 assists. That line would do Bill Walton proud.
Nicolas Batum played 34 minutes and scored 9. The defense was good. He didn't get much of a look on offense.
Rudy Fernandez was the most significant bench player. He wasn't as sharp as he has been the last couple games but he still had his moments. The whole second unit defense collapsed into oblivion for large stretches of their tenure and Rudy's defensive game works best when everybody else is solid and he can be a free roamer. He played 22 minutes and scored 8 points.
Slowly but surely the Patty Mills thing appears to be not working so well. He again shot an abysmal 1-7 in 15 minutes while notching 2 assists. You can't fault his effort or drive, but something needs to be reset in his game.
The rest of the bench was just place-holding so the starters could get some rest. Every starter topped 30 minutes tonight so we didn't see much of the reserves and what we did looked sloppy.
Stats of the Night
- Portland actually shoots worse than Utah, 48.4% to 45.9%. The Blazers got up 12 more shots, hit 4 more field goals, and notched an extra three for the difference. It was an energy-hustle thing more than a shooting thing tonight.
- The Blazers got those extra shots in part because they committed only 9 turnovers while forcing the Jazz into 18.
Odd Notes and Links
You can see here that Krizzikins has won this month's Jersey Contest. Don't despair, your next chance to enter can be found here.
Brandon Roy had a pre-game interview about his indefinite hiatus from the team. Both transcript and audio are posted here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
103 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That was a fun game to attend
Decent energy from the crowd tonight, even if there were a good number of empty seats, although not nearly as many as for some recent games. The crowd highlight was a “Wesley Matthews” chant with 1 minute left in the game. I don’t know if that came through in the broadcast.
There was a proposal on the Kiss Cam tonight. It looked like she said yes, but she didn’t look psyched about the whole situation. I don’t know if it was the guy or the method of proposal, but I wouldn’t be too surprised if the ring came off shortly after they were off camera. Awkward.
On the radio on the way home, Nate kind of called out Camby’s defense. He said Camby often works so hard for rebounds, he turns his body too early, being ineffective guarding his man. It sounded like he said it with a smile on his face, but it was a pretty direct, public criticism.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
Also
This game was a more extreme example of LA not getting as many rebounds when he is playing with a strong rebounding center.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 10:38 PM PST up reply actions
Agree about LaMarcus' rebounding
Some fans may look at the box score and say “he’s being soft again on the boards he should be getting at least 8 a night” there just wasn’t rebounds to get cause Camby was snatching everything in sight.
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 30, 2010 10:41 PM PST up reply actions
And rebound stats can be deceptive
if you’re the only one getting missed FTs, for instance, or you tip balls so that someone else on your team technically gets the rebound but he was just standing there more or less.
ignacio
Here’s my sort of sucky recap, quoted from myself in the post game thread. I’ll attach it to yours (agreed about the kiss cam, by the way).
Let’s see, the view from Section323.
At one point, the in house DJ appears to have dropped something on his turntable, mid play. I think even the players jumped a little.
Notable signs:
Blazers NY resolution: Hire the best knee doctor in the world!
I heart Free Throw Guy (!!!???)
The guy who sits on one side of me just won the contest to give Elliot Williams a nickname. Third place: E-coli
The guy who sits on the other side told me he saw me on tv at the Phoenix game. It was cute.
Huh, this is harder than I thought. Props to Roybot. Next game I’ll take notes.
Oh yeah, I forgot about the noise
I thought maybe Mason dropped his mic. Not that he’d be holding his mic, I guess. Fortunately it was right after the ball had been inbounded in the backcourt, they weren’t pressing, and Dre is pretty unflappable.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 10:44 PM PST up reply actions
One last observation
We were playing on the wrong side of the court tonight. Anyone catch the reason for that?
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 11:03 PM PST up reply actions
Its the normal pick
Because their locker room is closer to the tunnel nearest the usual visiting bench.
Sloan just likes changing it up.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
That's the way it is in the NCAA
No idea why its different in the NBA.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Speaking of Sloan
I was delighted when he got T’d up. The rest of the crowd seemed pretty happy, too.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 11:39 PM PST up reply actions
Dude is intense
Every time he comes to PDX they stay at the Riverplace Hotel since it has a good athletic club attached to it and he can work out at 5 AM (he actually does this according to my trainer).
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Marcus Camby isn't much of a man-to-man interior defender, for sure. Yet, that's always been the case.
Anyway, the story about the guy who proposed to his girlfriend at the game sounds like some ol’-fashioned uncomfortable comedy. It’s too bad she didn’t flat-out turn him down in public, because that’d’ve been even more captivating to watch play out on the big screen.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
My wife and I turned to each other right after
I was laughing. My wife looked horrified.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 10:49 PM PST up reply actions
Hint:
Don’t propose at sporting events. Once it might have been cool. It’s played out. Take her to see Ellen or something. Even a Tupperware Party would be better.
—Dave
"Anything for you, Dave." --Roybot
Better yet,
The beach is only 75 miles West on US 26.
"Love may forgive all infirmities and love still in spite of them: but Love cannot cease to will their removal." - C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain, 1940
Blazersedge.com || New to Blazersedge?
Actions -> Rec and Flag. Blazersedge works right when you use these two things.
Just hold on to the ring
It’s windy and rings are hard to find when dropped in sand.
—Dave
"Anything for you, Dave." --Roybot
You sound like a man with experience in these matters
But what do I know? I did it on the edge of a cliff.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 10:53 PM PST up reply actions
I theorize that Dave once held the One Ring
But the story of how he lost it was rather anticlimactic, so Tolkien left it out.
After a night of passion with a fair elf-maiden?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I promised myself years ago
That I would NEVER do that.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Those poeple were sitting directly behind me at the game
Awkward conversations ensued after the proposal on the big screen
Thanks!
But yeah, the whole situation was strange. Her acceptance was awkward, his 3 goggles were awkward. Good luck to them!
thats all your going to share ?
wedding on or off ?
If Oden does not give up on the Blazers, we should not give up on him.
Great time to be the proverbial fly on the wall.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
I disagree.
It’s always been cheesy. I can’t think of a single woman I know that would like to be proposed this way.
The cake was a lie.
and the ones who would are bound to be high-maintenance
if you know what I mean
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Hint:
Don’t propose
This was all that needed to be said :)
\oo///
by Billy Hoyle on Dec 31, 2010 12:04 PM PST up reply actions
Hint:
Don’t propose
This was all that needed to be said :)
\oo///
by Billy Hoyle on Dec 31, 2010 12:06 PM PST up reply actions
I would agree with that actually.
Camby’s gotta defend first, rebound second.
Blazers fan since '91
REST IN PEACE MAURICE LUCAS 1952-2010 R.I.P #20
"We're family because of this stupid, stinkin' team." - Dave
by rise_stand_resist on Dec 31, 2010 1:33 AM PST up reply actions
Had a feeling this kind of game would happen.
Portland just doesn’t seem to be a great matchup for the Jazz. Weird considering Portland couldn’t beat Utah last year. LaMarcus and Wes were ripping the Jazz apart all night long. LaMarcus would have had over 30 if he would have got some free throws on fouls he earned that weren’t called. He’s been nearly automatic in the post, gotta love it.
The bench wasn’t great tonight but it happens. Patty struggled with his shot but it’s not that big of a deal and he shouldn’t be criticized for it. If he goes 5 for 8 with three 3 pointers I’m sure nobody will mind. Rudy passed up some open looks but overall played solidly.
Shoot it is looking like Portland underpaid for Wes Matthews. He was phenomenal tonight and did it in every way.
So glad Marcus Camby was back tonight. He was dominant on the boards and makes such a huge difference.
Go Blazers!
"The Blazers [...] committed only 9 turnovers while forcing the Jazz into 18."
As a team, turnover differential continues to be of its best qualities this season.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
I love a team that can generate TO's and rebound.
If only we had another wing scorer…Oh, and some healthy bigs for a change.
The cake was a lie.
wing scorers to come off the bench
can be signed on 10-day contracts, fresh from the D-league in a week or two
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Or, do a 2 for 1 deal
a healthy Joel should make Marks expendable, but Przy and Camby haven’t been able to stay on the floor for more than a month at a time, lately. So Sean will probably survive as a backup big man
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Extended moments of agony on offense,
surrounded by beautiful team basketball was enough tonight.
Interesting to watch LMA try to figure out how to attack Fesenko. Equally interesting to observe Sloan’s determination to guard LMA straight up most of the time. What a stupid idea.
If anything, this game serves as a reminder that Portland has one 4/5 that can score in the paint. Yet they somehow continue to score in the paint while being a sub-par % shooting team. Go figure.
All in all, another fun home victory to watch.
chk yrslf bf u rec yrslf
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 30, 2010 10:52 PM PST via mobile reply actions
We didn't turn the ball over much tonight
But when we did, it always seemed to happen on the fast break, which was a minor frustration lost in the joy of an easy win.
by jigglyai on Dec 30, 2010 10:56 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Uh... Utah, let me introduce you to Wesley Matthews.
Oh! I see you’ve met before.
Listened to Jerry Sloan do his postgame interview. He so badly doesn’t want to admit that he is peeved that they let WM get away.
by 52therim on Dec 30, 2010 11:00 PM PST via mobile reply actions
No doubt Jerry hates seeing Wes drop 30 on the Jazz
Think about how dominant they would be with Wes in their starting lineup. So glad he’s in Portland =)
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 30, 2010 11:04 PM PST up reply actions
Sloan also said, and I'm paraphrasing to the best of my recollection...
“They are better than we are”. Does he really believe that? Do Blazer fans believe that?
That comment was a bit surprising.
by 52therim on Dec 30, 2010 11:23 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Huh
That is surprising. And no, I don’t believe that. However, I am happy they finally managed to run out of Blazer kryptonite.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 11:25 PM PST up reply actions
Well........
Head to head Portland is better. Utah just doesn’t match up well with Portland and Sloan realizes that. They don’t have anybody who can guard LaMarcus. The Blazers are 1 quarter away from leading the season series 3-0.
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 31, 2010 12:05 AM PST up reply actions
Hee hee.
Wesley. So sweet.
chk yrslf bf u rec yrslf
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 30, 2010 11:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
WTD
we won the day.
happy blazer fan.
Enjoy the Ride
Blunt+Sharp
by DigitalDaggers on Dec 30, 2010 11:23 PM PST reply actions
I like Camby being selfish with the boards.
4 pts and 20 rebounds is a good line for him next to LA the beast
She'll be right.
3 is still.kinda weak.for min.played/7foot
He should get 3 off alone, and 6-7 overall if camby has 20ish.
No blks either, but d was good?
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
by TyboOSU on Dec 30, 2010 11:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
it was swarming defense
A LA was doing some nice boxing out here and there also that made me happy.
She'll be right.
He had 3 going into the 2nd quarter
and too much foul trouble to go for blocks. The refs kind of tied his hands behind his back on that. I’m glad he was still effective offensively though.
LaMarcus didn't have that much opportunity for rebounds.
He played 3 minutes more than Marcus who had 20 so getting rebounds were hard to come by.
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 31, 2010 12:06 AM PST up reply actions
Btw, Roy should sit for year.
Core of wes/batum/lma is solid.
Just keep.fine tuning.things/play more together.
Who.says.we can’t make it past 1st rnd?
We just.need some blowout wins vs crappy teams and a few lakers/magic/heat close defeats/wins….hope is alive.
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
by TyboOSU on Dec 30, 2010 11:34 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Who.says.we can’t make it past 1st rnd?
Depends on the matchup, If it’s against the Jazz then I like our chances
But like Dave said, if the opposing team can take LMA away, then there’s not enough perimeter scoring to compensate
Still, if the current lineup goes on a roll against the easy stretch of the schedule (like their 17-5 run, last spring) the front office may decide to let the cake bake in February. That would be ironic
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
He's filling the scoring role
But he doesn’t create like Brandon. Still, he’s much more than I expected him to be, and I have no complaints.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 11:42 PM PST up reply actions
When Brandon was on
there was probably no Blazer in history other than Clyde who could match him for sheer jaw dropping ability. Having said that, I would have to agree that Wesley is really making up for the loss of Roy, and he is better than Roy on the defensive end. I think the 3 areas where Matthews is not better than the pre-injury Roy are 1) creating his own shot, nobody can iso and take his man off the dribble like Roy, 2) passing and setting up other guys, Roy was often #2 on the team is assists, and 3) hitting the clutch shots at the end of the game. Granted, Wesley hasn’t had a lot of opportunities in this regard, but I haven’t seen it yet anyways. Wesley is a hard worker though, and he is still young. He may very well continue to improve all areas of his game as the years go by. God knows, the Blazers will need him to.
by rhaegar on Dec 30, 2010 11:57 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Fortunate to have Wesley
He was a God send really. So many thought we overpaid but now its a good deal. Besides the Blazers knew more about Roys condition than we did so they did something about it. Brandon has acted strange this year but I don’t thinkit’s abnormal for someone so gifted and also is the face of the franchise, If he just gave up the fans would call him a rich-spoiled -ungrateful etc, athelete. It is a process that we don’t know the end of yet but we are Trailblazer fans and must let it play out. It’s a big task for Cho!!!!! GO BLAZERS!!!!!!
by Idahoblazerfan on Dec 31, 2010 12:09 AM PST up reply actions
Yes that is true.
Wes needs to work on his 1 on 1 game and mid range game which i think he will be somewhat comparable to what Brandon has done.
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 31, 2010 12:10 AM PST up reply actions
Matthews recently said that his mid-range game was better in college
he was asked to extend his range and shoot from distance after he came to the pros, but he’s been working on dialing in his 15-20 foot shots again, we saw another one of those last night
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Remember he was brought here mostly for his defense
Everything else is gravy. and I agree he will improve on the things he is weak at because of hard work.
hg
passing and setting up other guys, Roy was often #2 on the team is assists
This was more of a product of Roy having the ball in his hands so much and teammates knocking down kick-out jumpers, than Brandon threading the needle with passes for lay-ins
“Making his teammates better” is the mark of a superstar. If you could hit an open jumper then sure, Roy would make you look good. But if you were a big man who played near the basket then you had better go get the ball off the glass, because a dish wasn’t coming your way from #7
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
As long as the offense is moving
Wes will be able to score. Where I think things will get tricky is when we hit elite defensive teams with solid front lines and our ball movement dies or the clock starts to wind down. In that situation, it’s nice to have someone who can create something out of nothing.
LMA seems to be able to fill this role a little but, without someone on the perimeter that can do it too, we’re not really complete against tougher teams.
Dre creates fairly well out of nothing
He may not have B Roy range but a lot of time out of nothing he gets a layup or pulls up with a mid range shot. Rudy can as well from time to time, mostly when he wants to.
by JTDBlazers23 on Dec 31, 2010 12:13 AM PST up reply actions
Dre is great
but we need something perimeter to really stretch the floor well. Dre gets alot of his points off of pure savvy and posting guards up but when no-one can hit their 3’s against teams with good perimeter defense the other team packs the paint.
That makes things harder for both Dre and LMA. We saw some of this in the Nuggets game. Someone like a healthy Roy shooting from 3pt or mid-range would have probably drawn a double team and kept the defense moving around to compensate. That would probably have opened up things a bit more for Dre, LMA and the other guys.
by poorwebguy on Dec 31, 2010 12:21 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Totally different games.
Totally different teams.
chk yrslf bf u rec yrslf
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Dec 31, 2010 12:19 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Patty forcing the action
The only downside I saw to this game was the inconsistent play of Patty Mills. I thought he did a poor job running the offense. There were not very many good shot attempts when he was running the team. Patty also forced up long outside jumpers on several occasions very early in the shot clock. All of these shots missed too. I like Patty’s scoring ability, but I think that as the PG he needs to work a bit harder on getting other guys set up before he looks for his own shot. Batum for one I think could have gotten more offensive looks if Patty had made more of an effort to get him involved.
Surprisingly, I thought Patty's bright spots tonight were on defense
He did a good job getting in position to cause offensive fouls.
His offensive game was lacking, to put it politely.
We should bring in more scrub big men; they make good curse fodder.
by dan_the_man on Dec 30, 2010 11:57 PM PST up reply actions
Bring Armon back
I think they should give Armon another shot – in particular when defense is needed. He should be learning a lot by watching. Armon has more upside to his game than Mills but he too has a ways to go. I guess that is why they have coaches!
by Idahoblazerfan on Dec 31, 2010 12:00 AM PST up reply actions
I agree
I think Armon has a better chance of becoming a serviceable backup PG for us. I’m wondering if Rudy is the big catch here. Maybe the FO would rather have the energetic version of Rudy and find a way to get Patty productive then have Armon in place of Patty but with mopey emo Rudy?
It could also be that Patty is just going through a bit of a slump or needing to adjust to being scouted. I guess what bothers me is that the offense completely dies and we get killed in the paint. Taking charges is a nice touch but it does little to keep us afloat when we’re only shooting contested jump shots.
Patty
Patty couldn’t hit anything in the 4th, maybe after the 3rd clank he should have tried a different approach? Really concerning if he cant’ shoot, so why not bring poor Armon back from the turnover Gulag/
but he won't get any bigger
there are dozens of NBA guards that AJ can defend who are too big for Mills to handle
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
this
and it’s hard for a guy his size to see or pass over defenders. He almost seems better suited as the cheap version of Bayless…the one that can look for his jump shot and make a pass now and then but minus the careening toward the rim to draw the foul feature.
It’s actually a little ironic
Maybe the FO would rather have the energetic version of Rudy and find a way to get Patty productive then have Armon in place of Patty but with mopey emo Rudy?
Sigh, yes. They can “sell Rudy high” anywhere along the roadside between now and 2/24, as far as I’m concerned
It could also be that Patty is just going through a bit of a slump or needing to adjust to being scouted
Yes again, it doesn’t take too long for this league’s scouts/coaches to take away a young player’s strengths. I really didn’t expect Mills’ mid-range jumper to abandon him so quickly, though
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Was surprised his shot disappeared so fast as well
There are times the other team is leaving him wide open daring him to shoot. That may be part of why our bench is having so much trouble. He’s actually shooting worse than Miller so he can’t spread the floor, he’s too weak to really get in the paint and too short and weak to even consider posting anyone up.
The same things apply to defense…though he’s fast enough to get position for the charge.
or someone like him
after watching Watson last night, I’m glad Portland didn’t sign Earl
Basically when Portland dealt Bayless they were left with two really young/inexperienced backup PGs. Nate may have thought he could “get by” with Roy-Rudy-Matthews handling the ball when Miller was out, but that idea didn’t work out in November. So the bench will continue to be inconsistent, because the backup PG situation wasn’t addressed during the offseason
I wonder if a passing/scoring forward (like Antoine Walker) would help stabilize the reserve unit?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
hmmm Jerry Sloan says Blazers are probably a little better than Jazz
who are a 22-11 team. At least this week, fair statement. That may not be champoinship, but that aint “blow up” time by a long shot, just sayin. I don’t know if we can keep it up, and we have weaknesses. But this team is comming into a whole new style of play which is great fun to watch, and is winning. A couple good acquisitions and we can be a threat, no a walk over in the playoffs. Enjoy the ride.
Gotta love this teams heart again this year.
If Oden does not give up on the Blazers, we should not give up on him.
Add Joel to tonights crew and we are still not a great team but not an easy matchup for any one
by southern oregon on Dec 31, 2010 12:37 AM PST up reply actions
yep
Joel taking Marks’ minutes, plus maybe a few from Dante, and we really have a good rotation, minus the backup PG spot.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
I could see Portland reaching down into the D-league
to add a little bench scoring on a 10-day contract
and maybe send Babbitt back down so he can keep playing extended minutes
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Alacrity?
Who did we trade to get this guy LA was playing with in the paint? Hope he has good knees.
to answer the question...
Portland’s vulnerability right now lies solely in the prospect of a good defense taking away a leg of the offense, likely causing the whole to crumble from imbalance. Contrast that with a season ago when defenses couldn’t take away everything but the Blazers couldn’t get into many of their multiple options smoothly either. You can debate on which is better.
Way better to play as a team. Because it is enjoyable to watch and not an ego-fest.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
I agree, but the league is set up for star-powered play
I’m not saying that it’s right, but that’s how the playing field is stacked
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Coaching is the remedy to superstar hype.
What you say is true, with the notable exceptions of the Celtics, Lakers and Spurs. These teams play as teams (seen in their ability to lock down on defense.) And they’ve had some pretty good success with it.
The key is to have a coach with the spine to treat no individual as “special” even as the league and media and sheeple that follow the league anoint “superstars”.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
At the end of the second quarter, the Blazers got the ball with 27 seconds left. At the end of 24, someone threw up a airball. Then the ball bounced off two Jazz and LaMarcus got it and made a basket. The refs reviewed it and called it good (no shot clock violation).
Does that mean they ruled that one or both of those Jazz actually had possession? It was odd.
No change of possession.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD-7KBMMK1w
LaMarcus threw up the shot right as the shot clock expired when there was about 3 seconds left in the quarter. It took about 1.5 seconds to reach the hoop leaving 1.6 seconds on the game clock. However, the 24 second violation buzzer did not sound and the backboard did not light up. The play happens at 1:03 of the attached video link.
Regarding Mills.
I wouldn’t give up on him too quickly. Most of the shots he took were good looks, that he was absolutely right to take. I would be far more concerned if he was passing up those open looks. And as far as I can see, Johnson is the worse choice of the two at the moment. Johnson is a more skiled player from everything I’ve seen, and certainly has a better build for the NBA, but is way too selfish a player. My belief is a guard should always have more assists than points, and the ability to set up others for shots is what makes Nash, Miler etc so great. And Mills does get guys open looks. However, since he is playing with a second unit without much firepower, a lot of those shots are missing, and he is not credited with assists. Also, his work in drawing offensive fouls is fairly consistent, and those cheap turnovers can be important.
by Benny A La Vikings on Dec 31, 2010 10:44 PM PST reply actions

by 































