Game 18 Preview: Trail Blazers vs. Celtics
Game Time: 4:30 p.m. TV: CSNNW and NBATV
Wearing a 13-4 record around their collective necks like so much bling, the Boston Celtics won't see any reason to lose this game against the suddenly-struggling Trail Blazers. Rajon Rondo is having the pinnacle season of an already-impressive career, shooting near 50% and dishing out 14 assists with 2.5 steals per game. If he could hit a three he'd be all-universe but...aw, heck, forget the threes. He's all-universe right now. Kevin Garnett is far enough over the hill to start gaining momentum but he's still averaging 16 per game on 52.5% shooting, picking spots and shots with aplomb. His weakness is averaging but 3 foul shots per game. Paul Pierce is still scoring 20 and is shooting 51% himself, plus he hits threes (41%) and draws a few fouls (5 shots per game). Ray Allen, far enough over the hill to have lost momentum and just cruise, is hitting from everywhere (48% from the field, 45% from the arc). Shaquille O'Neal mans the middle, contributing 12 and 7 and only playing 23 minutes per game to keep fresh. In the absence of Kendrick Perkins and Jermaine O'Neal, Glen Davis chips in 10 and 5 in 29 minutes. Then you can go down the list of players you don't recognize on sight and realize that they're all performing well too. In fact this team leads the league with 50.4% shooting from the field and is third in three-point percentage. They don't draw foul shots or they'd score at a recent-vintage Suns level. They just don't have many team weaknesses on offense...or at least they know how to avoid falling into them.
Their defense is not quite so overwhelming. They're 9th in the league at field goal percentage and three-point defense, 15th in free throw attempts allowed. They do force turnovers. They allow fewer fast-break points than anyone in the league and are third in points in the paint allowed. Much like their offense, their defense is percentage-oriented. They don't like giving up easy buckets but they'll live with anything else.
In order to preserve defensive integrity Boston mostly ignores the offensive glass but they are a decent defensive rebounding team.
In other words, you're just not going to find many holes here. They're talented, deep, committed to working together, smart, and play the game they way it should be played.
The Blazers, on the other hand, are again short-handed, lacking confidence, staring at each other, and play the game in short spurts of production followed by dry wilderness treks of frustration.
Keep in mind, though, that the games nobody (including the opponent) expects you to win are exactly the ones you come closest to taking, if not take outright. Portland still has players who rise to big-game occasions. Portland has a history of making turn-arounds out of the blue. Portland also drags opponents into ugly-butt, grinding games...not a desire of the Celtics. Plus the Blazers don't thrive on shots that the Celtics like to defend. Want to seal the paint? Go right ahead. Don't want us to fast break? No problem. Going into a game relying on lower-percentage shots isn't a recipe for long-term success, but the Blazers do get hot from time to time and the Celtics won't stop the kind of jumpers Portland takes.
Ask me if the odds of winning this game are good and I'll tell you no. Nobody in their right minds would call Portland winning tonight. But this game might not be as lopsided as you think and it wouldn't floor me if the Blazers did paint one on the Celts, not necessarily playing better than they have but just by getting hotter than they have. Don't go talking any trash to Celtics fans just yet, but don't give up on this game before it's played either.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest Form here. Don't forget it's a new month so everybody starts at zero again with the same chance to win.
You can smell the roses (or shamrocks, I suppose) over at CelticsBlog.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FREE PATTY
It probably won’t solve much but nothing is as bad as Armon right now. I don’t get Nate. He always puts in Armon in the late 3rd and early 4th quarter when we have a double digit lead then the team falters. Coincidence? I think not. Not to say Patty would help but I’d like to see him get a chance rather than Armon committing turnovers.
Not really a stat nerd so can anyone answer what Armon’s +/- is during the 4th?
by JMLakaShotCaller on Nov 30, 2010 10:17 PM PST reply actions
I smell a blowout
Patty and Babbitt may be able to score more than 11 points in a drama-free 4th quarter
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I smell a massacre
Maybe we’ll see Patty and Luke in the 3rd?
I smell massacre as well
but I hope Patty and Babbit see some minutes tonight.
"‘These guys on Blazersedge are calling you an idiot!’" —Rich Cho’s wife
I agree with what you're saying about Armon
but this goes back to the ago old argument…do you shun your developing players for wins, or do you risk your wins to help develop your future talent?
the answer during previous seasons, was
play Sergio instead of Bayless to gain wins
this year, the philosophy has flipped, at least re: the backup PG position
you could say that Armon > Bayless as a PG prospect, but remember that Jerryd was the lottery choice, and he showed steady improvement once he received consistent PT
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
agreed
but Armon is literally wet behind the ears and can still defend in a way that Jerryd will never be able to, so I guess the hope moving forward is that the rest of his game comes around too at a fraction of the cost
AJ is a good prospect
but it was a huge risk to hand the backup PG position to a kid from the WAC, on a team that had high preseason expectations. (Contrast that with the decision to barely play Bayless who was a lottery pick from AZ, during his rookie season.)
It was Nate’s call, and he obviously sees more PG upside in AJ than he did in Jerryd. But everythime Armon turns the ball over now that’s on McMillian. It was a huge gamble for a coach who’s contract is expiring, I was surprised that Nate would be looking down the road re: developing AJ, rather than at advancing in the post season this spring
The way November has gone, the gamble failed, but the choice is now academic. They’ve gotta keep playing the rookie because a legitimate opportunity to advance in the post season is slipping away
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
prediction..
Blazers win 98-94.
by smoothbeans on Nov 30, 2010 10:18 PM PST via mobile reply actions
This game, I will let slide.
Unfortunately we didn’t win Philly, so losing this game makes us look crappier.
GAH!!!!!!!!!!
On the other hand, if we win, then at least we can say that stuff went wrong, and we DESPERATELY need to be more consistent.
Is this game on national tv?
I am dying to watch it regardless. Guaranteed entertainment.
Enjoy the Ride
by DigitalDaggers on Nov 30, 2010 10:58 PM PST reply actions
We've got em, right where we want them....
An instinctually wise woman once sang “Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose”.
Are The Blazers free enough to let themselves win this game?
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
Kristofferson wrote that song with Fred Miller
I was surprised to see that Roger Miller was the first to record it, followed by Kenny Rogers, Gordon Lightfoot and countless others, including Joplin who made it her own just days before she died
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Celtics by 18
What we’re feeling right now is just how Spurs fans felt at the end of their run of success, except that their run lasted more than 2 years, included playoff series wins and is still going on.
This is the perfect chance for Nate to mix it up
And bring Roy off the bench under the auspices of it being a back to back. But I think he’ll play Roy for 38 minutes and watch him barely move in the 4th quarter per usual.
is the jury still out
on whether Roy is playing tonight or not? Did I miss any indication either way?
"1-2-3 1-2-3, whip whip whip smile!"
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
by TyboOSU on Dec 1, 2010 12:13 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
please.... lets never talk about anyone on anyteam hitting a 3 ever again
i wish it could be an end to an era in blazer history. ya know if we had signed shaq this offseason he would be our best player!
brandon is alot like kobe, mabey shaq can make a rap song about him too.
which blazer is kg most likely to get on all fours and bark at?
Babbitt seems like he wouldn't hit back - so him
Kevin Durant won me over when he went Rocky IV on Russia this summer.
by blazeraddict on Dec 1, 2010 12:22 AM PST up reply actions
Blazers lose by 30
if philly and new jersey can beat you by double digits (philly was 9 but close enough) than the best team in the east will murder you and make it look easy. Tonights loss officially threw me off the comcast bandwagon and not even a win against the celtics can get me back in. FIRE NATE AND BLOW UP THE TEAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (save aldridge and matthews)
I miss #25!
This'll be a bloodbath.
I predict Boston wins by 20+ points.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
Ordinarily I'd say that this is the sort of game the Blazers would win.
Second game of a back-to-back, shorthanded, tough opponent, struggling with their game. Over the past year and a half, the Blazers have managed to do well in these games.
Not tonight. The problem isn’t that the Blazers are struggling. The problem is that they have surrendered.
If the Celtics win by 20, the score won’t reflect the game.
I'm going to have to agree
With what I’ve seen lately, If we do lose this by 30+ it will be because of garbage time.
here are a few quotes from the Blazer's leader, Brandon Roy
"It just depends," Roy said. "Do we have enough to win a game here and there? Yeah. But we’re thin. I don’t think that’s a secret.
"I just think we have to be realistic with how we continue to approach these games. We’ve almost stepped back into a developing phase. We’re developing guys again. I think we’re developing our bench. I think that’s some of the frustrations we’re having."
win a game here and there...well Brandon, as long as you are collecting a pay
check that should be just fine….
My Prediction: Blazers won't knock down their shots
Resulting in a 40 point loss. Teflon Nate scoffs at reports of his demise. After all, this is Portland, Oregon – where it doesn’t matter if you’re mediocre as long as you’re a good guy.
For reals though: Boston has inside play. Portland does not. This is going to get ugly.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
What's most likely is that Lamarcus and Camby get in foul trouble
and right now there is just no one backing them up. I’d like to see Babbitt get some time, hit a few shots. So what if he can’t play much defense? Outlaw never played good defense here and he had two pretty good years.
I would just to see something that offers some hope.
ignacio
the only thing i can't decide....
is if the blazers lose by 20 or 30. One more loss closer to drafting Kyrie Irving!
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
I hate going into games almost positive we're going to lose
There was a time when we knew we could beat anybody on any given night. Even without Oden.
I've got to go to the Orlando game next week..... I am not looking forward to that blood bath.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
You mean the last two years?
sigh
"The game was delayed for over 15 minutes with 5:07 left in the second quarter after France's Nicolas Batum, who plays for the Portland Trail Blazers, dunked and twisted the rim. Volunteers and officials scrambled to put a new rim on the basket and reattach a net."
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/olybb/news/story?id=5509394
Look at the bright side. The Blazers’ have a better shot at this one than the Beavers do in the civil war game.
I give the beavers a better chance
to be honest.
"The game was delayed for over 15 minutes with 5:07 left in the second quarter after France's Nicolas Batum, who plays for the Portland Trail Blazers, dunked and twisted the rim. Volunteers and officials scrambled to put a new rim on the basket and reattach a net."
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/olybb/news/story?id=5509394
the Blazers have been losing the same way most of the Duck's opponent's have
boat race during the 4th quarter
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
why doesnt nbc do the blazer games
When they are on nbatv? It doesn’t make sense. Nbc does all the games that are on espn. When everyone can watch those games.
by Kosta0027 on Dec 1, 2010 10:08 AM PST via mobile reply actions
I always give the Blazers a good chance to win.
until the game starts and I find out which team shows up. The great team that used to show up more often than the bad team has been away on vacation and is due to be back tonight.
hg
Good point
I’m hopeful we’ll play up to Boston’s level, unlike the last couple games. At least some effort would be nice.
by BBlazer on Dec 1, 2010 12:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Good luck boys!
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
by TyboOSU on Dec 1, 2010 12:15 PM PST via mobile reply actions
this is going to be a very, very long season isn't it?
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
All I want to see
is the Blazers abandon their 4th quarter hot potato offense. Last night I half expected the team to point and laugh at the Blazer stuck with the potato, hoisting a panicked shot to beat the clock, and calling him a loser.
Guys, start showing some stones in the 4th quarter and at least go down fighting.

by 


































