Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Blazer Training Staff Guilty of what???

So I have been hearing a lot of people who are pointing the finger at the Trailblazer's training staff and demanding that they be immediately replaced.  They point to the ridiculous number of knee injuries sustained by Blazers of late.  They go back as far as Zack Randolph and Darius Miles and include Jeff Pendergraph, Gred Oden, Joel Przybilla and Brandon Roy (there may be others as well).  It is, they argue, beyond reason to think that all of these injuries are mere coincidence.  So I ask, "Are they?"

What exactly do these people believe our training staff is doing to cause all of these injuries?  I mean really...Think about it.  What are the Blazers doing with their players that no other team in the league is doing?  What methods are they employing?  What strength and conditioning programs could they possibly be having their players follow?  What special dietary programs could they have concocted without the rest of the league catching on? 

I mean, don't you think that if there was something that was so extreme and unique that it was causing all of these injuries that it would just jump right out at everyone involved?  Don't you think Bill Bayno would have already exclaimed, "Ohhhhhhh, maybe we shouldn't have Greg strapped to that joint twisting apparatus while he sleeps at night!  I'll betchya that's what's causing all the swelling during his sleep! Dammit.  I knew that infommercial was full of crap!"

I want someone to please come forward with a theory...anything...anything at all.  Crickets??

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What more proof do you need????

Does EVERY player need to have surgery before you change something?

by bad karma on Nov 18, 2010 11:06 PM PST reply actions  

I agree there have been lots of injuries but

let’s say we bring in a whole new staff. When they arrive what do we tell them NOT to do? No pool workouts? No stationary bikes? I mean…aren’t they going to do the same things basically? Maybe there is a unique surface on the practice floor? I don’t know. Give us something to work with? I guess you’d just tell them, “And make sure no one else gets injured.”

by mlsinpdx on Nov 18, 2010 11:11 PM PST up reply actions  

hadn't thought of this way before

When they arrive what do we tell them NOT to do?

If you cant answer this question then you have no basis for firing the training staff!

by greg6582 on Nov 19, 2010 1:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I would tell the old staff

“hey, sorry about your luck, but we need a change. Thank you for your service.” I would tell the new staff, “your job is pretty safe, unless 7 – 8 players go down with career altering injuries.” I fail to see the harm in this. I am in a performance based job, so I am used to this type of attitude. The owner of the company I work for does not care WHY sales are down, only that they are. Its not an EFFORT based job, PERFORMANCE is what matters. Thats how I would treat this situation. I guess we just disagree.

by bad karma on Nov 19, 2010 6:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Yes, we do disagree. Just because you work for an employer who has this attitude does not mean you have to espouse it as well. Maybe sales are down because of the economy or a new competitor with lower prices or a better widget. Replacing existing employees is expensive and you don’t know that you’ll end up with better employees even after all the costly training is done. It seems far more reasonable to find out what the reason is (or reasons are) that sales are down before overhauling the sales force.

So before you go ahead and replace our training staff, please make sure you have a new, better staff waiting in the wings.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Confusion of cause and result.

OP is asking for causes. And we’ve got none, except the Blazers have drafted some people with injury histories that have come back to bite us. Maybe we should stop doing that.

"Love may forgive all infirmities and love still in spite of them: but Love cannot cease to will their removal." - C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain, 1940

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Nov 18, 2010 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I could list a bunch of things

I don’t know how valid the list would be because I don’t know what the doctors and trainers have tried. I’m not a doctor and my only knowledge in the science was gat from rooming with a guy who went on to work for the San Francisco 49ers as a trainer.

I can only tell speak on what I would have done..

Lets start with the Oden pick.

I would have picked Oden. Breaking a wrist doesn’t make you injury prone. I scouted both Durant and Oden as A class players. So all things being equal you take the big. Who knew Durant would grow an inch. Dantley’s legs didn’t bother him and they were off by at least an inch and a half more than Oden’s. After the first injury to Greg I do extensive research in what could have caused such an injury. There would have been progressive action taken to prevent it. Thinner shoes, a girdle, alignment surgery, diet change, stem cell injections, hypnotism… stuff like that.

With Roy the first thing I do is have him stop taping his ankles. Have him run in vibram fivefinger shoes to strengthen his ankles and arch. Would prefer repairing his meniscus instead of cutting it. At this point I would think about a collagen transplant for his meniscus but only after months of research with a team of doctors.

I would X-Ray Andre Miller to see what is working. Isnt it ironic they have the leagues iron man?

Lastly I would try to take everything I could from the Suns Erik Phillips.

by Kaanyr Vhok on Nov 19, 2010 12:46 AM PST up reply actions  

I seem to recall some teams where concerned about Greg's knees going into the draft.

How they got that information I’m not sure (physicals taken during team workouts?).

Regardless, I’m with you in that i still would have taken a chance on Greg over Durant.

Although I probably would not have taken Roy given the info teams where privy to about his knees going into his draft.

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Nov 19, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep same here

Roy seemed like a big risk yet even though I had no clue how good he would become I was happy to get him for Bassy.

by Kaanyr Vhok on Nov 19, 2010 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Roy was a great pick, just look at what he accomplished while on his rookie deal

It was this recent max contract with knowledge of his knees that has me scratching my head, not the initial draft choice (which I stand by as being an excellent move, LMA as well obviously)

by sammymohawk on Nov 19, 2010 12:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow

a man of vision….something this organization needs instead of it’s moronic subscription to the same thing over and over.

I agree with a lot of what you say, even the 5 fingers for Roy LOL.

Uggg it’s torture going through this knowing this team could be getting better care.

Trail Blazers Check List Since 2007:
1. Hire new Training Staff based on restoring symmetry to physical body.
2. Replace Nate MicMillan with coach with proven success at highest level.
3. Develop LMA's handles until he becomes Kevin Durant 0.8

by loyal_blazer on Nov 19, 2010 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree that we have drafted some people with injury histories.

This is the one thing we can point to as the cause of this. When you combine this with some extra bad luck….Maybe that’s the story right there. The training staff has had to deal with the injuries as they have occurred. I think it is a stretch to argue that they caused the injuries.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

It sure would not hurt anything to get rid of them

Lets give it a shot, whole new staff top to bottom and dont let the door hit you on the way out.

by Planet29 on Nov 18, 2010 11:17 PM PST reply actions  

it probably wouldn't hur your company to can you either....

not trying to be rude to you or anything but that appears to be in line with your logic.

by Escrote on Nov 19, 2010 10:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Look.into.phoinex approach

New philosophy.needed, maybe not personel.

But like coaches, im sure med staff has some stubborn, if mainstream, approaches.

Seriously…grant hill reborn.

OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!

by TyboOSU on Nov 18, 2010 11:56 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

comparing coaches to training staff is a stretch

your insinuation that training staff have their own agenda and they keep methods from other trainers, as coaches do couldn’t be farther from the truth. the trainers don’t care what the score is, they are doing a job and that is to keep the players healthy. this “lets fire the trainers” is the purest definition of a witch hunt.

"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice

by koyote on Nov 19, 2010 12:20 AM PST up reply actions  

It definitely is a witch hunt mentality.

People are saying, “Something is happening that we don’t understand and like. Who can we blame for this? We gotta blame someone to make ourselves feel better.”

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Blazer Training Staff Guilty of what???

SUCKING… that’s what!

What other training staff has had 1/2 the knee problems of this outfit in the last 3 years?

The Faith don't panic, the Faith freaks out, burns out small farms and villages in the name of the Faith.

by faith on Nov 19, 2010 6:39 AM PST reply actions  

Also, please remember that the players are the ones

who have the injuries. The training staff is dealing with them. The knee problems have happened to the organization, not the training staff.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

what?

"I know, right?!" - Annoying new phrase every idiot is using

by mlsinpdx on Dec 9, 2010 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not black and white

The blazer’s injury woes are not the product of one indisputable source. They come from a combination of things: pre-existing conditions, bad luck, a curse, and most likely other things we as fans aren’t aware of.

Existing in this context is the training staff. We know that there is a huge variety in methods and practices of the training staffs around the league: Phoenix’s staff is rightfully seen as cutting edge; the wunderkind in detroit treats players with herbs he grows at his home. Human knowledge about how to prevent and treat injuries is evolving at a constant rate. It’s quite obvious that some training staffs are more effective than others.

Given the blazer’s situation, is it possible that a different training staff with different methods and practices would have had more success in mitigating what has gone on? Absolutely.

by NeverSummer on Nov 19, 2010 7:29 AM PST reply actions  

And where should I look? I've read about the Phoenix training

staff and am impressed with their results. I know the Blazers have looked at them as well. Can you provide links?

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Check out what the guy in Detroit is/has been doing.

I read a bit awhile back and it was very interesting. I’d provide links but I’m too lazy.

It would be interesting to look at injury statistics for teams over time with regards to their training staff’s philosophies.

by NeverSummer on Nov 19, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

I am going to quote a The Game host

I heard a little of both Lund and Calzone so not sure who it was pointed this out to me.

It’s not about blame at this point. It’s about accountability. I don’t know who’s fault it is that Roy has no meniscus. That Joel broke his knee. That Greg broke his knee, twice, plus his acl and everything else knee-related. That Batum missed half of last season. That Pendergraph broke his knee. That Williams is done for the year.

It very well could be nobody’s fault. But we pay Jay Jensen and his staff to condition our guys so they can play as many games as possible. It’s not about blame. It’s about who is accountable. The med staff is supposed to know more about sports medicine than anybody in Vulcan, so Vulcan is just going to have to follow their gut and see where it leads them.

by jiminut on Nov 19, 2010 7:34 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

My question is are the current staff members doing everything to embrace newer philosophy's on strength and conditioning

as well as balance training? Just because something has worked in the past doesn’t mean it will work with a new set of people. I think 20 years ago, players were more likely to have balanced musculature because people didn’t just focus on one sport. Now kids who show potential in a certain sport are encouraged to focus on that sport, which develops only the muscles that are used the most in those sports. This can lead to imbalances in strength across muscle groups and developing the strong muscles more which would likely be the focus of the old school training methods only exacerbates the problem. So if you have one set of muscles that is way stronger than another opposing set, it’s quite easy to understand how this could lead to unbalanced pressure being applied to static physiological elements like ligaments, tendons and bones. I heard an orthopedist on the radio yesterday say that recent ACL recovery methods can heal a ruptured ACL in 90 days, yet our docs determined Pendy’s injury to be season ending and he was waived. The question could be raised that he was waived to clear a spot for another able body, but that’s just a short term solution. I sure hope Pendy is getting good advice about his rehab regimen, because if it’s possible to heal that ACL in three months as opposed to six or nine, it sure would suck to find that out after the fact.

Sure things might not be looking great right now, but look on the bright side. I have liquor.

by Tyler Durrden on Nov 19, 2010 9:09 AM PST reply actions  

here's a link to an accelerated ACL therapy at Cyclone Sports Medicine

it has the patient returning to full, normal activity at the 4-6 month mark instead of the standard 6-9 month mark. Just goes to show there are alternatives out there, that have proven to be as successful or more so than what we may be using. I know that healing and training are two different issues, but it’s really hard not to ask the question, “Is there anything we can do differently? We sure seem to have a lot of these problems.”

look for the accelerated therapy at the bottom

Sure things might not be looking great right now, but look on the bright side. I have liquor.

by Tyler Durrden on Nov 19, 2010 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Check out the Steve Blake workouts that were on BE a while back

they are doing a ton of rehab and preventative stuff. The training staff is not supposed to be experts. They are general knowledge guys that consult with experts. Did you not hear the press conference or read any of the articles… they have been consulting with the best in the business. The human body is not a math formula or chemical reaction that occurs in a beaker.

by Escrote on Nov 19, 2010 10:13 AM PST reply actions  

The Phoenix Suns staff do believe the body is somewhat of a math formula, and it is.

Your body is designed to be symmetrical. This prevents stress throughout the rest of it. The Phoenix Suns measure the symmetry of their players bodies through grid lines on a computer!!!

Oden has the least symmetrical body in the league. Have not heard one thing that has addressed this problem. They keep treating the symptom (knee) instead of the cause.

Trail Blazers Check List Since 2007:
1. Hire new Training Staff based on restoring symmetry to physical body.
2. Replace Nate MicMillan with coach with proven success at highest level.
3. Develop LMA's handles until he becomes Kevin Durant 0.8

by loyal_blazer on Nov 19, 2010 12:31 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes.

Although in truth, to make him symmetrical they would have to make one of his legs longer or the other one shorter.

by NeverSummer on Nov 19, 2010 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Greg's kneecap exploding last year

….was a red flag to me. Now, obviously I know next to nothing about training staff methods or the training staff itself. I’m just making a chain of assumptions based upon what has been given as a fact:

The fact was that Greg’s kneecap exploded because of pressure exerted by his massive (quad?) muscles. I assume that overdeveloped quad muscles in a very large human being is a preventable thing. I also assume that the training staff had the knowledge that such a thing could occur (I’m making this assumption because of my own life experience — I saw a slalom skier at Mt. Bachelor incur this exact same injury once when I was a kid and it stuck with me because I always marveled at the fact that the guy’s muscles were so hard they broke his kneecap). This in turn leads me to assume that there may have been either a lack of oversight or just plain poor prescription with regards to Greg’s weight training regimen.

I’m not claiming to be right or wrong here. I don’t know. What I am saying is it is possible to look at the Blazer’s training staff with a dubious eye without being a hysterical witch hunter.

by NeverSummer on Nov 19, 2010 11:41 AM PST reply actions  

Blazers Training Staff

Guilty of not being able to see what is wrong with Oden.

Guilty of not knowing which risks they should take in the draft.

Guilty of preventing the least amount of season ending injuries over this AND last year.

What more do the need to be guilty of?

Trail Blazers Check List Since 2007:
1. Hire new Training Staff based on restoring symmetry to physical body.
2. Replace Nate MicMillan with coach with proven success at highest level.
3. Develop LMA's handles until he becomes Kevin Durant 0.8

by loyal_blazer on Nov 19, 2010 12:26 PM PST reply actions  

okay...one at a time

I think we all know what is wrong with Oden
Training staff did not have decision making power in the draft room
What could they have done differently to “prevent the least amount of season ending injuries” (whatever that means)?

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

i don't understand...

how can you criticize people for thinking that the training straff might be responsible?

i mean, what evidence do you have that the training staff isn’t doing anything wrong? as far as i know, none of the fans know what the training staff is doing. how have you come to the conclusion that the training staff isn’t responsible for all of these knee injuries?

by DefenderOfPants on Nov 19, 2010 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

that's a fair question

I don’t know that they aren’t responsible for the knee injuries, but then I am not suggesting that they be rewarded for exemplary work.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

also...I am not criticizing people for thinking the training staff might be responsible

I am simply asking someone to come forward with a theory or an explanation of what they might be doing to cause the knee injuries. I still haven’t heard anything. What are they doing wrong? I understand that they could do some things differently…that’s not the issue. The issue is what did they do wrong? What should be avoided in the future?

I personally think the reason no one has an answer is because there isn’t anything.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 19, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

well, all we have to look at right now are the knee injuries...

none of the injuries were the result of blunt trauma, i don’t think. so, you have to wonder if it’s a structural problem. then you have to ask: are a lot of our guys just susceptible to knee injuries? if so, were the trainers taking the proper precautions to avoid injuries?

i don’t think you can call this bad luck, with the exception of Pryzbilla falling in the shower. the players aren’t getting hit by cars or having pianos fall on them. so, either we have a lot of the players with wonky bones, or the trainers are doing something wrong. or both.

i mean, coaches have lost their jobs for less. GMs, too.

by DefenderOfPants on Nov 19, 2010 3:23 PM PST reply actions  

I have no idea where to look this up

But it’d be interesting to know what % of knee injuries (to normal people or professional atheletes) are non contact injuries.

by TP.5 on Nov 19, 2010 5:56 PM PST up reply actions  

good question. I would venture to guess that the vast majority

are non contact. They happen when you come down wrong on your leg or just due to wear and tear. Torn ACLs and cartilage damage are the things I have in mind.

by mlsinpdx on Nov 20, 2010 8:14 AM PST up reply actions  

As I've pointed out in other threads, there's a bizarre double standard at play here

Do owners have to have iron clad, irrefutable proof that a coaching staff is to blame for their team’s perennial losing in order to can them? Of course not. No matter how qualified and hard-working a coaching staff is, no matter how uncertain it is just what they’ve been doing wrong—if anything—if their results are consistently poor, they get the axe. INVARIABLY. The logic is that there’s little to lose in changing direction, and perhaps some new blood will turn things around.

Yet, for some inexplicable reason, Paul Allen and the Vulcans seem incapable of applying this same logic to the Blazers’ medical / training staff. This is mystifying to me.

My guess is that the latest Oden injury will prove to be the straw that broke the camel’s back. That is, that despite all the votes of confidence we’ve just heard from Cho, Nate, etc., Jay Jensen, Bobby Medina, Dr. Roberts, et al are on their way out. But even assuming my hunch is right, why did it take so long? Why did the injuries have to mount year after year before something happened? That’s a real head-scratcher.

by hurryup09 on Nov 19, 2010 11:19 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

people have to be mad at someone.

Could be that with Greg getting injured it put more stress on Joel.
And with Joel being injured it lowered Aldridge’s efficiency.
And with Aldridge having a harder job and getting tired it put more stress on Brandon.
We have a good training staff. This reminds me of WWII when the white-house blamed Admiral Kimmel and General Short for the attacks on pearl harbor.
It makes people feel better if they can scapegoat someone else.

People should stop bitching and realize that everyone in professional sports has worked their ass off to get there.

by Sheed30 on Nov 20, 2010 1:02 AM PST reply actions  

Obviously as fans....

Obviously for the great majority of fans all we can base opinions on The Medical and Training Staff of The Blazers, are results. And results for most of us, unfairly or fairly are going to be what # of injuries or percentage of injuries the team suffers.

Others more directly or directly tied to the profession of medicine have offered opinions on specifics and procedures.

While for myself, it is true and I will concede that I fall with those only able to offer an opinion based on perceived results, I still will not hesitate to offer my opinion.

I think there is a tipping point, where you at least reach the place where you should ask yourself….are we suffering more injuries as a team than other franchises? Then the logical next step if the answer is YES…is to ask Why?

I’m sorry, but dedicated, hard working, “buddies” with our players aside…I do think we have reached that tipping point, and I do think there are reasons to question our medical and training staff.

I would question on specifics as much as I possibly can. No one from The Blazers has offered or given an explanation to me about Elliot Williams. From what little information that has been offered, it sounds very much to me like Elliot Williams suffered from a condition with his knees that made his knee cap stability in both knees questionable. Even before playing for us, this has resulted in him needing surgery to correct this condition on both his knees. This sounds very much like a condition that should of been discovered before drafting him and if anyone knew he had this condition nobody is admitting it today. To me either The Blazers knew he had this condition and it was “X” degree of risk in drafting him, knowing that there was a good potential that he would need the surgeries that he has come to need and have performed…inwhich case The Blazers should of been upfront and honest about being aware of that risk OR The Blazers did not know this condition existed when they drafted Elliot Williams and discovered it only when he arrived in Portland and almost immediately started to suffer with knee problems. Either scenario needs to be questioned. Because either scenario represents a degree of failure…

Keep in mind that during recent Oden press conference it really should not suprise anyone that The Blazers closed ranks with solidarity and total support for their medical and training staff. As an organization they have no choice. We are talking agents and contracts and literally 100’s of millions of dollars at stake, along with the careers and livelihoods of players and The Doctors and Trainers themselves. The potential legal mess that could ensue? Means even if an individual within the organization did have a doubt about the compentency of either the medical staff or the trainers or training methods? The organization cannot afford to publicly admit it….

So I don’t ever expect Rich Cho, Nate McMillan, or Larry Miller…or the principals themselves…to say…“I think we failed” or “Yes, we missed something”. They simply would not open themselves up to the liabilty mess that type of admission could result in…

And again, specifically, I do think there are reasons to question. While it quite true that as a detached fan my direct exposure to the medicine applied, the training methods applied, and the rehab procedures applied is very, very limited, I would say during the Jay Jensen portion of the Press Conference, there were a couple of moments or comments that made me question.

Again nobody has given me good explanation as to why 6 month old MRI results were deemed the optimal tools to offer an outside specialist to get a 2nd opinion. And outside of a defensive and almost stubborn, “We Will Take New MRI’s When The Team Deems It Neccesary” statement…I have to wonder why it took several weeks and Brandon Roy very publicly removing himself from an active N.B.A. game before The Blazers shut him down and FINALLY deemed it necessary to take new MRI’s. Regardless if the results of those new MRI’s evidently revealed nothing new.

The other personal opinion I have, is very- admittedly very subjective, I’m simply not happy with the vagueness of The Blazers definition of the timeline of Odens latest injury. Yes, injuries can randomy and spontaneously happen with athletes…or with humanity as a whole. But it’s part of this medical and training staffs responsibilty to be as pro-active in knowing about the condition of there athletes…even if injury occurs that they cannot prevent. What I find troubling about this latest problem with Oden, is that Oden was complaining of discomfort and pain…and it sounds to me like Dr. Roberts and Jay Jensen both assumed that Odens complaints or discomfort was due to “The Hardware in His Knee”…or his existing patella recoverey and rehab. They seemed to make this assumption because at least at the very first…Oden was not exhibiting a lot of swelling in his knee….

  It may of been a situation where nothing could of been done to prevent the damage. Or even at the earliest complaints of discomfort by Oden…it was already too late to change the inevitable. But “assuming” that a player rehabing from Patella Knee surgery is experiencing pain in his knee and assuming that pain is the “normal” pain and suffering one would get with rehab….is still an assumption. And it seems that once again…no new MRI’s were taken with Oden…until his knee became swollen repeatedly and to the point where repeated drainings were not helping. Even then by Jay Jensens admission, the MRI’s were taken with the Assumption that they would reveal a Patella related conditon….and Dr. Roberts and himself were both evidently “shocked” and stunned when it revealed the cartilage damage.

  Like I said, I don’t know if anything was avoidable..but I wonder why Oden was encouraged to work out…even while expressing that he was experiencing discomfort in his knees…and why MRI’s weren’t taken either immediately upon Odens admission that he wasn’t comfortable, or at least simply on a timeline…like "We don’t care if your knees feel fine, or appear to be healing perfectly…we would like to take new images every 3 months regardless…just to be sure…..

  Now on this last point I will admit, I’m speculating a LOT…and medical professionals can tell me why “Things just aren’t handled that way”. And I’ll listen.

  But I’ve reached the laymans tipping point…I will question.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Nov 20, 2010 6:53 AM PST reply actions  

I just thought of something, we've heard Shaq and Grant Hill say that the staff at Phoenix is responsible for extending their careers.

Has anybody ever heard any player say this about the Trailblazers medical and training staffs? I don’t know if the knees of CP3 and BRoy are in similar states, but it would definitely raise some questions if CP3 continues to play like he is with his knee supposedly bone on bone, while we see Roy struggle to see playing time. I think it’s valid to ask questions at least. If not now, then when? Would it be more acceptable if the injuries continue for another three years? I’m of the mindset that asking questions doesn’t hurt, and I would rather ask 100 stupid questions that lead to no solution and get the one that does, than simply accept the status quo because it’s the easy thing to do.

Sure things might not be looking great right now, but look on the bright side. I have liquor.

by Tyler Durrden on Nov 21, 2010 7:32 PM PST reply actions  

Cp3/Roy

Cp3 didn’t played as many games as averaging right under 40 minutes in such a short amount of time. Roy did.

by Sheed30 on Nov 22, 2010 11:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm