Blazers Guard Brandon Roy Leaves Hornets Game With "Sore Left Knee"
Original Post: 7:15 PM.
At the 6:14 mark of the third quarter during tonight's game between the Portland Trail Blazers and the New Orleans Hornets, Blazers guard Brandon Roy appeared to injure his left knee while making a crossover move with the ball against Hornet wing Trevor Ariza. Roy did not make contact with another player and appeared to sustain the injury while making the cut.
Here's a look at the play.
Roy jogged off the floor, heading straight the locker room.
The Blazers sent a text message to the media shortly after Roy left the court, which read "Brandon Roy (sore left knee) will not return to tonight's game at New Orleans."
Roy was 1-7 from the field during the game with 2 points, 1 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal and 1 block in 22 minutes of action. The Hornets were leading 58-50 when Roy left.
More details when they become available tonight.
The Blazers have two days off before their next game: at the Memphis Grizzlies on Tuesday night.
Update (9:57 PM):
Jason Quick of The Oregonian reports...
Back in the locker room, Roy was examined by New Orleans team doctor Matt McQueen, who determined his knee was stable but swollen. He asked Roy to perform basic movements, like squatting, but Roy said he couldn't complete the movements without sharp, piercing pain in the left knee.
The immediate plan is hazy. Both Roy and coach Nate McMillan said he will accompany the team today when it flies to Memphis, where it plays Tuesday, and general manager Rich Cho said the team will take a wait-and-see approach."We will see how he feels over the next couple of days and re-evaluate,'' Cho said via text message late Saturday night.
Ken Berger of CBSSports.com also writes with a similar prognosis going forward...
A source tells me Portland will see how Roy feels in the next couple of days and re-evaluate. "Not sure yet" if he will miss any games.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
138 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
:(
I thought that’s why we sacrificed pendergraph
Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".
...no seriously--stop.
by nima on Nov 13, 2010 7:21 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Go back further if you can.
It definitely happened 4 possessions before that. Right around when Andre hit Nic with that no-look.
Now accepting free tickets and drinks for the 2010/11 season!
i noticed that too
he’d been hobbling up and down the court a few times before this play occurred.
by hollywood robinson on Nov 13, 2010 7:52 PM PST up reply actions
Mike Rice, always the optimist
first the “banged knees” then the “maybe an ankle” lol
rice always sounds senile.
Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".
...no seriously--stop.
Someone please explain to me how a player fulfills
a 5 year professional basketball contract without any meniscus in his knees? Am i missing something?
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
That might help to explain why the Vulcans freaked when KP and Penn showed up with a max length max money contract without team options - and Roy went on to re-injure the knee before the playoffs
by Norsktroll on Nov 13, 2010 8:08 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
From a business standpoint that was really dumb.
The Blazers could have got him with at least the same deal if they waited for him to be an RFA and would of had a ton of leverage after the injury at the end of last year.
At least we're not the Wizards
Super-max deal for Arenas.
Sigh.
"Coach said to always be careful around Greg, because Greg costs a lot and even the slightest amount of basketball can damage him." -- The Onion
It's baffling
The Blazers balk at signing DeJuan Blair in the second round because he lacks ACL’s in his knees. Yet they sign a guy to a max deal who has little to no mensicus (the shock absorber between the leg bones) in his knees. The ACL’s key function is as “the guardian of the meniscus.” It keeps the knee’s rotation in bounds so the meniscus doesn’t tear.
A player without ACLs is at risk of damaging his meniscus. But how much worse off is a player with no meniscus left? I’ll answer that question: he’s infinitely worse off, because ACL-deficient knees can be reconstructed, but once it’s gone, mensicus can’t be replaced (at least not currently).
I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.
It's baffling you didn't know meniscus could be replaced....
by Gremarcus Roynandez on Nov 14, 2010 6:39 PM PST up reply actions
I'm numb to this.
Didn’t even phase me when I saw the headline. That’s probably not good.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
by bfan on Nov 13, 2010 7:57 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I actually think it was couple plays before.
He was grimacing and moving bad even before the play he went out.
I will run naked through the streets if Oden wins the MVP this season...happily.
Hmmmm... not looking good.
I wonder is surgery is inevitable. I’m curious to see.what happened after other players have had the same issue.
Check out my music and blog at J-Xile.com
Good luck finding a truly comparable example with repeated problems in both knees
Right now, players with at least one meniscus surgery who went on to continue their careers include Brad Miller (pretty much the same), Nene (same to improved, had other injuries too), Farmar (worse), Nelson (worse), Paul and Roy.
When you expand to the NFL you could include players like Anquan Boldin and Osi Umenyiora who continue to play after having similar surgeries on one knee.
for Pete's sake..
McMillen,
Allen,
Cho,
Lamarcus,
Trainer X,
Doctor Y,
Mayor Adams,
Someone,
Anyone,
Please convince Roy to take some time off, Fly him to the Bahamas for some rehab,
Tell him that the world will be all right, And find him a hobby that will hold his interest for next seven months.
Explain to him that Future Roy will understand and be grateful.
And the Past Roy who came back to soon from surgery during last year’s playoffs,
was far too eager, and a perhaps a little foolhardy.
by thorncity on Nov 13, 2010 8:15 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Optimism, Pessimism, and Realism
Roy dropped to the sixth pick of a relatively weak draft even though the consensus was he was easily the most NBA ready and most likely to win Rookie of the Year. The concern was about the knee surgery he’d already had.
Greg Oden had been hurt at Ohio State, had mismatched leg lengths and his physical raised red flags among many league GMs (I’m not arguing nearly all of them wouldn’t have taken him anyway).
LaMarcus Aldridge broke his hip in college and was sidelined for a year. Though the break was fully healed and he came back from it in college, a hip break is an extremely serious injury for an elite athlete and many of them never properly recover from it (see Michael Dickerson for one example).
Three times the Blazers have rolled the dice on players with injury histories. We did OK with Brandon on his rookie contract. He gave us four great years. His new max contract may end up making for a long, dry five years if he can’t play at the level at which he was delivering before he signed it.
The gamble on Oden has been a disaster. The number one pick in what everyone was heralding as the strongest draft since 2003 and we’ve seen 82 games in 3 years. Everyone wants Greg to be healthy and have the opportunity to play up to his potential. But at this point, no one expects it.
Only the Aldridge choice seems to have been wise long-term. He has his detractors, but he has worked diligently on his game and has improved every year in the areas he has needed the most work. Unfortunately, he doesn’t have the talent of a franchise player, so we’re looking at several years of 40-45 win seasons if he’s the go-to guy.
The Blazers have been optimistic in hoping the guys they pick with injury histories wouldn’t have serious injury issues in the NBA. It hasn’t worked out. There are no guarantees in life or basketball, even a player with no past injuries can get hurt. But past performance predicts future performance. Players who have been hurt before are more likely to be hurt in the future.
Because the Blazers management has been willing to take this risk, the Blazers “championship window” looks like it has closed before it ever really opened. As Blazer fan, it’s heartbreaking.
by baduk on Nov 13, 2010 8:22 PM PST reply actions 5 recs
who should we have drafted then?
Tyrus Thomas, Adam Morrison, or Sheldon Williams instead of LaMarcus?
Randy Foye? Rudy Gay? Patrick Obrien or Mouhamed Sene instead of Roy? The only other player that is near Roy’s caliber is Rajon Rondo and 21 other teams passed on him due to a bunch of red flags too.
Hindsight is 20/20. W/o Roy, LaMarcus, and ODen there wouldn’t even be talk of “championship” window at all in the first place…
by odiek on Nov 13, 2010 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
As of this moment, taking health and everything into account, I would rather have Rondo and Millsap from the ’06 draft and Durant from the ’07 draft.
MPOTCP>PGOTF
yeah, for sure. I don’t regret the ‘06 draft. It was still a terrific draft. I think there are reasonable questions about giving Roy a max extension, about drafting Oden and about LA’s deal, but I was behind 2/3 of those moves at the time, so I can’t really question them.
MPOTCP>PGOTF
If the Blazers didn't have Roy, they would have needed Durant, correct?
Jury is out on Oden but it seems to me the servicable big who has some offense and not constantly out due to injury is better than the REALLY TALENTED guy who sits on the bench 2/3 of his career.
Deron Williams
Oops! Wrong draft.
nevermind
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
In KP We Bust!
You mean to tell me, maybe KP wasn’t such a demi-god, and the Vulcans weren’t such corporate Satans, after all???!?! But, but, Canzano said … and he only speaks the bald-faced truth!!
by Sheedwasright on Nov 14, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions
One small correction
LMA didn’t break his hip. When he was a freshman he had surgery to repair cartilage and a tendon in the hip flexor area.
I haven’t done the research, but I would be surprised if most guys in the draft didn’t have a physical problem at some point in high school or college. It’s a little bit of a crap shoot, with some injuries being more ominous in the long run.
(But that’s minor stuff. It’s a good post and I believe I turned it green.)
Wiggada Wiggada Zers!
Hmmm
I think you are operating under some major misconceptions. Durant had HUGE “red flags” as well, because he tested so god awful athletically/physically at the NBA combine. Sounds ridiculous right? Well it is every scout’s job in the NBA or NFL or MLB to figure everything that could possibly go wrong with a player to the point that they are picked apart mercilessly.
People claim Oden had injury history- A broken wrist. Please somebody explain to me how a broken wrist that was ok to play with indicated knee injuries. I’m studying to be an athletic trainer right now and we have to do pre-participation exams and fit to play guidelines, and honestly nearly every single person I have ever done these on has a difference in leg length. Nobody is perfectly symmetrical. You make note of it so that you wont get sued but the chances of them having knee injuries is nearly the same as any other person.
So many players enter a draft with questions surrounding their health and I would be curious to see to what extent people are right about those concerns. The NBA draft is largely a crapshoot and they have a tough time just getting the talent projections right. Every single pick is a roll of the dice in every way. Why is predicting injuries supposed to be “obvious” to the casual fan? That’s an absolutely stupid idea that anyone can predict these injuries no matter what you say about past ones.
When Oden’s knees do very flukey and random things, I get incensed to hear people say anyone should have seen that coming. Nobody did. No matter how much you know about knee injuries because you had one once or twice. Doctors who have actually gone to school for this and made it their profession are just as baffled as Greg is himself. The crap that people give him is so unwarranted.
by sPresley on Nov 14, 2010 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
One of the things we heard about Cho's interview after he was hired
is that Rich has an extensive database re: knee injuries and how well players recovered from the different surgical procedures. He sliced the data up as many ways as you can imagine. Guards versus forwards. Right handed shooters with left knee injuries, etc. He has this data in a spreadsheet and he showed it to Mr. Allen during his 3 hour interview aboard the owner’s yacht, last July.
Now, for someone like Paul who has invested tens of millions over the years in ballplayers who have failed to last until the end of their contracts, hearing about this data from a GM candidate must have been intriguing to say the least. This is not to say that Cho wouldn’t have drafted Oden in ’07 or signed off on the Roy extension in ’09, but knowing how long and how well a player will perform following various knee surgeries is valuable info when it comes time to make a deal, or to offer an extension to a popular member of the team.
The power to predict/project based on this data is still not foolproof, however, because not all players will have the exact same physiology, or pain threshold. Some heal faster or slower, as we’ve seem with Joel and Greg (even though their injuries weren’t identical)
The best we as fans can hope for is that the Blazers will be less likely to take a flier on a player with knee problems in the future than they have in the past, as long as Paul takes Cho’s data under advisement when they’re discussing players. But like you said, even the player who is given a clean bill of health one day can go out and suffer an injury the next. The fans may not like it when it happens—or they may try to use that mishap as more “evidence” that the training staff “should have known” that the player was susceptible to being hurt—but the fact of the matter that as long as players are jumping 3-4 feet off the floor and landing awkwardly hundreds of time every week (with little time off to rest their bodies during 9 months of the year) serious injuries are inevitable.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
right. a couple things ive learned along the way in med school:
no two bodies are alike.
doctors tend to treat populations rather than individuals (because its hard/impossible to account for/predict individual variation).
we don’t know everything medically.
only 30% of what is practiced is actually “evidence based”.
- especially comes into play. you can get a general idea of how people are going to do but its in no way a guarantee of how player X (ie Oden) will respond.
Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".
...no seriously--stop.
Sorry to hear that! He had been injured last year, too.
We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time. ~Vince Lombardi
To grow is to change. Let us not grow weary in our pursuit to change...
No
Painful. Either deal with it or rest it, primarilly.
/////
((o))
///// #20 Always remembered.
Yeah...
If you’re a 40yo anyone who isn’t a professional basketball player than “no” is the answer. If you’re the hopes of a franchise, it means your job description as you know it has to change. The only way someone with bone on bone knee injury could stay in the NBA is if they were getting paid league minimum to be the experienced cheerleader/motivational guy that hypes up the team any only plays a few minutes a game. I am so saddened by this news yet infuriated that there isn’t a proper screening protocol for the NBA draft. I know it steps into the realm of protected health information but if you’re an elite athlete the team that drafts you should know that you have no flipping cartilage in your flipping knee.
What I find interesting is that this goes to show you how incredible the true greats were/are. Unless Roy has some type of congenital weakness in his cartilage that made him be bone on bone before his 30th birthday, he probably did this to himself from years of playing his arse off. So that probably means players like MJ and Kobe simply didn’t have to play as much to be who they are/were. How ironic that makes Roy’s nickname.
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
Yes
No way Roy can fulfill his contract. Best thing for Blazers is medical retirement ala Darius Miles
Brandon will eventallu need microfracture, total knee replacements, or some future as of yet developed procedure.
Time to re evaluate the future and reshape this team.
Pritchard really hosed the franchise,
Good luck magnificent 7!
by doomsdaymachine on Nov 14, 2010 5:08 AM PST up reply actions
How would microfracture surgery help knees that have no minisci TO repair?
TKR seems like the only repair.
What happens with the medial retirement thing? Are the Blazers responsible for the max contract?
If so…this is something I’d like the NBA to look at.
See him in Memphis?
Personally, I would fly him home and sit him for the next 3 games.
There is a weird 6 day break after the 3rd game making the next time he would play Nov. 26th (nearly 2 weeks). Might as well sacrifice BRoy for 3 games than and get him 12 days off rather than playing him then risking him having to sit for 2 weeks somewhere down the line but miss 7-8 games over that stretch.
If he has problems after sitting 2 weeks….yikes.
In the end, this is most likely the beginning of the end of the Broy era as we know it (can you imagine him in 2014-2015 season?). Unfortunately, this will put the Blazers into 4 years of mediocrity as they will probably be a team that competes for the playoffs but not good enough to do much damage. Therefore, draft picks in the 17-22 range which mean realistically no new #1 guy.
Can’t do much salary cap wise as BRoy is max and LA is for all intensive purposes a max player.
BRoy, unless a minor medical miracle happens, is now untradeable as there is no team that will trade for a MAX player with shot knees as it will only financially strap their team. At the earliest, we could trade him with 1 year left on his contract for a team looking for salary cap relief the following year.
I have a feeling that Cho is going to need many many bottles of Advil near him at all times as IF Broy trends this way the rest of the season, he will have some interesting decisions to make.
Continue with the committment to the current team or go into re-build mode and hope to land a Top 5 lottery pick in the next few years which would mean, GO would not be re-signed, Miller same, Batum would be too expensive, and trading LA eventually for shorter contracts (believe too hard to trade this season due to being in the 1st year of his new contract).
The reality probably is, if the knees take BRoy out or reduce him into a shell of what he once was, it will bring the Trailblazers team to their knees for the next 4-5 years as it is next to impossible to realistically compete in the NBA when your franchise player is a shell of what a franchise player should be. Take out any team’s top player or significantly reduce his effectiveness and you are looking at a team that has no shot at winning a championship and most likely a mediocre team. They will be financially up a creek with an untradeable player.
Here is to some REALLY REALLY good Anti-inflammatory shots
by keeweekid on Nov 13, 2010 8:53 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Really?
Even if it does turn out to be something bad, you want to blow up the rest of our core? I am still not convinced it’s going to be a career devastating injury. I think it could certainly be career altering, where Brandon might take a while to adjust his game. He may never be as explosive as he once was but he can still a solid player and contribute in multiple ways and as a leader.
Definitely stay committed to what we’ve got. Even if you take away Roy, there aren’t many better young core’s in the league than we have.
Above all, it is still far too early and we haven’t even gotten a diagnosis on the injury yet, so I am going to wait and see before making any judgement. Let’s see how he’s doing in February or March.
by Blazas! on Nov 13, 2010 10:31 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
intensive purposes
intents and purposes
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 10:31 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
anti-inflammatories reduce swelling
so narcs aren’t going to help anything except dull pain and make it MUCH worse long term
/////
((o))
///// #20 Always remembered.
We should have
Traded Roy for Chris Paul this summer.
We should have drafted Durant
by Captain Hindsight on Nov 13, 2010 9:27 PM PST via mobile reply actions
we should have traded Roy for the second pick (Durant)
if you are goin to do hindsight, do it right !
POSTED: Please do not throw cigarette butts in urinal.
It makes them soggy and hard to light.
there's always the old standby
draft Durant, trade Roy for Dwight Howard
(Which is just a spinoff of everybody’s favorite Captain 20/20 Hindsight idea)
Draft Jordan, and trade Drexler and Paxson for a dominant big man
Mama always said life is like a box of choc-lates. You never know what you’re gonna get.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Paul's knees are reportedly in nearly as bad shape as Roy's
They were saying the same thing about them last summer: there’s very little meniscus left.
I was born in '52, and I believe in #52. Hang in there, GO.
You too, Przy: everyone knows you're the heart & soul of the Blazers.
and he is a pg which means you can play alot longer with bad knees
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
Why would a PG be able to play longer with bad knees versus any other position player?
either my sarcasm sensor is stuck or this meaning does not compute
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
You must not play basketball or....
look at the history pgs in this league. They can generally play many more seasons than say a center.
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
not once they lose their lateral quickness
PGs tend to be replaced by younger athletes with fast-twitch muscles, unless they’re veterans who have superior BBIQ. Not all of them do
OTOH, centers are rare and even Marks can still find a gig. If Sean was 6’5 he’d be doing something else
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
PG's are almost always shorter...
the closer you are to a normal height the better off you are when it comes to things like knees… long moment arms put a lot of torque on joints.
Where are you Captain Hindsight?!
Seriously. I mean, this injury plague thing is getting ridiculous. Just ridiculous. Can you imagine if this team played a heavy contact sport?
In rugby their bodies would last until the first intermission.
but they look good in sportscoats
all lined up behind the Blazer’s bench
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I am here
but you probably should have listened to me.
by Captain_Hindsight on Nov 14, 2010 12:20 AM PST up reply actions
Blazers at a Rest Stop?
I guess outside of my own selfish disapointment the question I ask myself is will rest even work?
I don’t want to be a downer, and I really have enjoyed watching Brandon since he became a Blazer, and when he is healthy I think he is a great, great player…so these questions are difficult.
But it seems to me if the meniscus is gone, and cartiledge is gone…then you could rest Brandon like Han Solo in Carbonite and he still isn’t going to be able to play at an N.B.A. level. Seems to me that you can’t “rest and ice” something that is gone…back into existence.
I’m not a medical expert. And I really hope I’m wrong. But aren’t we rapidly heading towards a place where the reality is that Brandons career is in jeopardy or at the least the length and quality of his playing skills are likely to be shortened and hampered?
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
Probably.
We’re going to need Greg Oden to become serious injury free for many seasons because I think Brandon might not be all that valuable when it matters most anymore.
yes, it sounds like they have been 'band aid' ing a knee (or knees) that has been going down hill
Maybe there is surgical treatment to fix it. Not impressed with what has been done so far. Playing through, while courageous, may also be self defeating is the long run.
Nate broke his Roy toy.
Man...
So as I said somewhere before, in the Oklahoma game, we would either watch Roy progress, either painfully or joyfully. In that game, it is safe to say that the meter is within the middle, but really leaning toward the joyful side.
And now this… When I recently read somewhere he didn’t have anymore meniscus….
Man, I mean, I’m an optimist, and I HOPE that he can still come back strong.
To me, nothing is impossible. But in this situation, it’s going to take plenty of hard work, right moves, and a BUTT LOAD of luck.
So, what’s the next move? I say we further cut his minutes. 25 MPG still might be a bit too much, but sounds right.
As disappointed as I was in the loss, at the same time, I wasn’t really mad. I guess my expectations for this team has lowered, but I’m expecting my expectations to increase once Oden comes back, and once Roy comes back… at least in the form he was in in the second Oklahoma game.
Man, one hit after another. And it didn’t stop with the 2009-2010 season (how many times do I have to make that reference? Seriously!) I thought it would end, but no. It just carried over to the 2010-2011 season. Maybe, just MAYBE, our lucks will change once the year is 2011.
No, seriously.
Well, I’m talking too much.
Good luck Blazers! I swear, if we lose to Memphis…. with or without Roy, I want to win.
One thing is for sure - we'll see what kind of coach Nate is
Without BRoy the Blazers will have to play good movement ball, something I don’t think Nate has excelled at. I hope he proves me wrong.
Feel bad for Brandon and the fans. And wish we had passed on the problem to another team sooner, once we (I?) realized that Brandon’s play doesn’t work so well with everyone else standing around in a BRoy 4-1 iso and not having many other movement plays getting everyone involved. Related side note: notice how much better W Matthews looked in Sloan’s system?
Greg – It is up to you . . . . .
put a body on 'em
Game recap:
Blazers lose a rough game.
Blazers fans lose their collective stomachs.
Larry Miller last seen visiting New Orleans Voodoo witch doctor in effort to remove curse.
PS. Geoff Clark should pack a cooler of extra knees on every trip.
by HowlinJoeWolf on Nov 13, 2010 10:49 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
This won't end well with Roy.. these types of situations don't just magically get better..
and there is no surgical answer, which makes this situation even more frustrating..
I don’t know what to do now..
Oden needs to become a total monster, and if this Roy thing goes the Penny Hardaway, Grant Hill, Mcgrady, etc… route… it may be time to start moving pieces (Miller, Camby, Pryz, Rudy) and get back in the lottery to get a young guard
I hope it doesn't go into the hardaway, hill, mcgrady route.
I want Roy to at least to 75% consistently of what he used to be…
dang, that’s sad.
But hey. True, things are going bad. But, as hard as it is, we don’t always HAVE to look at it that way (Roy going down). Sure, this is a HUUUUGE set back, but then again, every individual is different, and Roy might still come back strong.
So let’s just hope for the best.
Something just doesn't feel right about this...
Are we really supposed to believe that Nate, Cho, Larry Miller, et al were completely ignorant of just how severe Roy’s knee had gotten? Given the fact that Nate was playing him 39 minutes per game prior to Roy coming out and complaining about needing less minutes, that does seem to be the case. If so, what does this say about the communication between players, coaches, and management in this organization?
Alternatively, if the organization was aware of the severity of this problem and yet continued to ride him for nearly 40 minutes per night (or ride him to finish last season for that matter) instead of sitting him and forcing him to undergo microfracture then what does that say about their willful ignorance towards his health and sacrificing his long-term value to capitalize on short-term gain?
Either way you look at it, it doesn’t seem that the organization handled this situation very well. Perhaps this is only perception since the Blazers are not very open with information. But the way this all went down and was “played off” to the public seems to have caught everyone off guard. When you’re talking about your star, max contract guy I just don’t get how that happens.
by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 11:31 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
+1
These are valid questions. Unfortunately, when the potential conclusions include ignorance or recklessness on the part of the franchise, it makes you worry.
Kevin Durant won me over when he went Rocky IV on Russia this summer.
by blazeraddict on Nov 13, 2010 11:49 PM PST up reply actions
I think this goes to show you
that players probably have way more rights to privacy about their health issues than they should. There is NO WAY nate knew about his knees and let him play so much. Just like there is NO WAY Oden doesn’t know what’s wrong with his body. They just don’t have to tell anyone, and if they refuse tests they probably can without consequence.
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
Hill,Kidd,Amare
W/Hill it was his ankle that was effed. Took forever to get straightened out.
Kidd is the feel-good microfracture story. Lost much of his explosiveness,but used his skill to remain a top player for yrs.
Amare is the poster child of successful microfracture.
From the outside this is looking more and more like microfracture surgery is coming.
It is looking more and more like the McGrady situation where McGrady was told microfracture was one of options(evidently that was also discussed w/Roy earlier in May) and team doctor(s) recommended going w/out it and instead strengthening surrounding muscles to take strain off knee(and wasn’t Roy supposed to have spent summer working out,shaving pounds off his body?). The Rockets tried sitting him on back-to-backs and resting him,but after a few months the swelling and pain grew too much for him and he opted for microfracture surgery.
Again I stress I have no info other than what I read on the web,but it is looking on the surface eerily like what Houston went thru w/McGrady.
If Roy eventually does go for microfracture surgery,keep in mind he’s still on the young side and played several yrs in college,whereas McGrady came straight from HS and had over 10 yrs in the League.
Further Roy seems to be in a much better mental place,accepting his game is going to have to adapt and he’ll lose some of his athleticism,whereas McGrady thought that the arthroscopic surgery and then the microfracture were going to return him to his glory days as one of the Leagues’ elite players.
Problem is: None of those cases ever had comparable meniscus problems
He would need a meniscus transplant, or even more experimental procedures.
We should have taken Chris Paul in the 2005 draft.
by Captain_Hindsight on Nov 14, 2010 12:22 AM PST reply actions
Has anyone ever seen Captain_Hindsight and LukeBabbitFTW in the same place at the same time?
I’m thinking “no”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
There's only one logical course...
…if anyone in charge at Blazer’s, Inc has a brain, Roy will be forced to undergo microfracture surgery and sit out this season, rehab, and try a comeback next year.
Or they can force/allow him to play out his contract until his knees are slowly pitted and ground into a fine, chalky powder…and he becomes less mobile than Pryzbila.
Take your pick.
Trading Roy...reality? Crazy
Its sad but like many said, if broy is, reduced to a shell for the future, we need to then cut our losses, trade him for cap relief a,la mcgrady and find a new face of franchise.
Hopefully he finds a way to adjust, but I know how detroit/rockets fans feel when their marquee guy is injury plagued.
Maybe batum takes over riegns, or even greg stays healthy, but we have to remember the blzrs as a,whole, and not sink blindly with a hobbled broy.
:(
OSU '06
Trade for Gerald Wallace!!
by TyboOSU on Nov 14, 2010 4:11 AM PST via mobile reply actions
LOL good luck trading away Roy. Would YOU want to trade for a player on the first year of a 5 year 80 million dollar contract that may have career altering / ending complications from multiple knee surgeries?
#20
by dario argento on Nov 14, 2010 8:53 AM PST up reply actions
just when Portland was finally free of the Darius Miles contract
we’re right back in the luxury tax hopper for the next 4 years
it’s a tradition, we wouldn’t really feel quite right if there wasn’t an albatross contract on the payroll
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
just sitting here imagining
all the offers we turned down for Roy the last 4 years…………..
We must endeavor to persevere.
On Trading Roy
Many people talking about trading Roy. But if the injury is as bad as we’re assumming/believe, then what team would take that contract? It’s not an expiring contract, so how would any other team benefit from taking him? We’d have to include Batum (underpaid) and others too sweeten the deal, which would leave us even worse off, IMO. Brandon is a Blazer for the next several years. I’m rooting for him, and TRYING to be optimistic. Here’s how I do it..
*Greg comes back and becomes a force.
*LMA then becomes the perfect Hi/Low combo
*Roy either returns to glory, or becomes a guy who hides in the corner and hits threes to spread the D, with an occassional drive to keep the D guessing.
*Batum grows into a near superstar or better.
*Armon becomes the PGOTF
*We make a a few more trades/drafts to complete the pic.
Get well Brandon/Greg/Elliot/Joel.
Wanted: A MEANER Blazer attitude! Knock somebody down and step on him!
The L*kers, The Heat, and The Thunder...the New AXIS of EVIL.
by CaptHustle on Nov 14, 2010 6:37 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Correct. Brandon is a Blazer for the next 5 years.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
unless he opts out in 2014-2015
but that’s a long way off to bring any consolation
the lockout and new CBA could bring changes. Remember when teams were given a singular opportunity to dump one of their contracts (Allen Houston rule)? Maybe some proviso like that will drop out of the sky
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I'd shut down Brandon and gut the veterans right now. Get a Top 10 pick, and get ourselves
a stud PG or SG for the future.
Have to pray that Oden comes back and stays healthy, we have LA and Nic…
Gotta find guards of the future. At this point, you just can’t rely on Brandon being part of the core.
Roy has to come back SOMEWHAT to get teams interested,
then he has some value. Right now, not going to get any teams excited.
Either the rest plan works (not likely), or we sit through more surgery.
Maybe go the Miles medically disabled route, but will Roy do that ?
Too early to tell. I have long not been “all about Roy”. Now, finally, Nate is going “team ball”.
Nate broke his Roy toy.
On Microfracture: People cite that as an option for Roy (or a worst case), and then cite successful NBA players with it
That’s not the same condition, so it’s not likely to help as the doctor the team visited in LA pointed out. None of those athletes had a missing meniscus in both knees. And microfracture is done to the end of the bone to create new replacement cartilage out of the cells in a blood and bone marrow clot as a “gliding surface” so the joint moves smoothly again, not to recreate the same dampening mechanism of a meniscus. While the meniscus is very thin, that surface is even thinner and doesn’t provide the same buffer effect.
There could be options for surgical treatments of Roy (all of which would cost him at least a season). I’ve heard of that clinic below in another context but can’t remember where. There are other specialists for that also at the University of Washington or in Vail, so this is not really about some specific doctor.
They seem to use a combination of a cadaver transplant of an intact meniscus (so-called allograft transplantation) and/or a procedure called articular cartilage repair (autologous chondrocyte implantation, a therapy enriching and re-injecting own cells of the patient. While different cells a bit a la the platelet-rich plasma therapy Roy did for his hamstring). While there are successful long-term studies, those are not specific for athletes but typically for much older patients with a much lower post-surgical performance goal. So comparable cases are slim as already outlined in a comment above.
http://www.stoneclinic.com/meniscuslinkspage
http://www.stoneclinic.com/biologic-knee-replacement
http://web.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/92-B/7/941
by Norsktroll on Nov 14, 2010 7:12 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Correct. Microfracture cannot replace menisci. It is used to replace the cartilage that protects the ends of the bones (called articular cartilage) within a joint.
I do fear Brandon will eventually end up needing a procedure like microfracture to repair articular cartilage if he is having bone on bone contact. Without his menisci there will be much more abuse to his knee than before.
Still right now, microfracture appears to be the most dependable widely-used surgery to fix damaged articular cartilage, but as you mentioned, new procedures are becoming available. Also, new studies are pointing out flaws in microfracture surgery. The main flaw is that while microfracture stimulates the growth of new articular cartilage, it is a different kind of cartilage that is not as effective at absorbing shock.
The normal articular cartilage is called hyaline cartilage, and it is spongy, slick and smooth. When you compress it, like when running, fluid ( called synovial fluid ) gets squished out of the hyaline articular cartilage and into the joint cavity, increasing shock absorption and lubrication. The cartilage produced from microfracture is called fibrocartilage. Fibrocartilage is tough and hard, and not as good at lubricating. It is normally found where in joints that need to be very strong, like where your ribs connect to the sternum, or the pelvis.
Chondrocyte implantation seems to be the sexy new procedure as I’m reading about it. It creates true hyaline cartilage like before.
#20
by dario argento on Nov 14, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
so, continuing to play with no meniscus is directly damaging the articular cartridge -
going backwards, from a microfracture goal state. I just don’t get why a surgeon would remove a meniscus and not immediately implant some replacement material, if that is possible, which aparently it is, considering the patient is a pro basketball player. I mean, the knee is going to get abused. It seems a terribly short sighted treatment. Maybe worth a shot, but it appears to already to have failed. And, playing throuth is just making things worse. How is it going to “get better” really ?
Nate broke his Roy toy.
It allows the patient to get back to action faster than the conservative treatment, or alternative treatments (which are experimental in nature). In Roy’s case, he was rushed back to action in college once where he returned 3 weeks ahead of schedule, and the Blazers also brought him back quickly twice, especially last spring. But yeah, long-term it might have been better to try to preserve whatever was left to preserve beginning in college.
...
so, continuing to play with no meniscus is directly damaging the articular cartridge -
Probably. No one could say for sure, but my anatomy class really accentuated just how important the menisci are in padding the joint and stabilizing it.
#20
by dario argento on Nov 14, 2010 8:16 PM PST up reply actions
guys guys guys
All you have to hear is ‘bone on bone’ or ‘no meniscus’ and were done talking about microfracture, local steroids, or anything else that involves intervention on native tissue. If he is indeed without meniscus in that knee his career as a franchise player is 100% over. Let’s wait until Walton dies so that this curse can be lifted (I didn’t say ‘hope’ he dies), meanwhile enjoy the folly of our ownership.
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
the Blazers had serious injuries before Bill came to town
the very first Blazer drafted (Petrie) suffered several knee injuries that cut short his playing career. Ditto Lloyd Neal. Even Mychal Thompson broke his leg during the offseason following his rookie year and missed the next season
but no one asks them if they’d like to help exorcise any so-called Blazer curses, everyone brings up Walton and Bowie
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
LOL Partially correct...
…there are no direct comparisons of athletes missing menisci in both knees who have undergone successful career saving surgical procedures. Ergo, the prognosis is bleak.
That said, doing nothing is irresponsible and reckless.
Most of the aforementioned information regarding various options is generally true. However, there remains a small chance that microfracture would spur enough fibrous cartilage that it would reduce Roy’s pain level and allow him to play out the remainder of his career with a lower pain level. While this won’t return his explosion, it would allow his level of play to remain at a consistent albeit lower than peak level.
The chances are small it could help. But, without attempting something there is absolutely zero chance he will ever play again pain free. Taking a constant dose of liver damaging anti-inflammatory drugs and pain killers so he can hobble around shouldn’t be acceptable to anyone as a front-line response.
LOL myself...
“While this won’t return his explosion, it would allow his level of play to remain at a consistent albeit lower than peak level.”
See my comment about remaining the franchise player.
“The chances are small it could help. But, without attempting something there is absolutely zero chance he will ever play again pain free. Taking a constant dose of liver damaging anti-inflammatory drugs and pain killers so he can hobble around shouldn’t be acceptable to anyone as a front-line response”
You’re obviously not a doctor so don’t talk you are. Neither anti inflammatories nor narcotics harm the liver in any way unless they contain tylenol. The former harm the kidneys and the latter harm nothing…unless you’re a addict and break into peoples glove boxes to steal their vicodin (if I had a penny for how many times I’ve heard that)
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
Isnt this.....
The same surgery Magglio Ordonez had with the White Sox? I can see how this would be much easier for a baseball player to cope with. A basketball player? I think I am ready to cede to the fact that the old Roy is gone. Best case scenario is lile some have said. Just hope that they can make the knee bearable and hope Roy can adapt his game a la Jason Kidd.
"You can lose lots of money chasing women, but you will NEVER lose women chasing money. " - Mr.Landis
No good. No good may come from this. :(
#20
by dario argento on Nov 14, 2010 9:19 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
this is the bottom line.
there has to be some white out around here. Printer toner should work- Macgruber
Re Roy's contract
Grant Hill got a max w/out the Magic medically checking him out after his ankle injury in previous Play-Offs.
McGrady got an extension of his max despite concerns about his back.
Elton Brand got a max coming off micro and barely playing.
Amare just got one despite serious questions about his knees and eye.(Those issues were reason Phoenix didn’t offer him a full max.)
Teams are willing to pay for top talents and hope medical issues won’t bite them.
Other teams would look at Roy being able to play at a high level and coming back so soon in the Playoffs last season and would be willing to roll the dice.
Anyone here believe Chicago,NY,NJ wouldn’t have offered the max they could for Roy?(We know NY was willing to overlook serious medical concerns.)
Talk about a PR disaster in letting Roy walk then,combined w/Oden and Pryzbilla,and the KP firing would be believed to be because he wanted to keep Roy…
W/the last yr’s partial guarantee,bonus clauses that take place of the extra 2.5% raise the home team can offer a FA,the Blazers have for all intents and purposes simply matched an outside FA offer.
...
Other teams would look at Roy being able to play at a high level and coming back so soon in the Playoffs last season and would be willing to roll the dice.
Roy already received his max extension before the playoffs last year.
#20
by dario argento on Nov 14, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions
The assumption/argument is Roy wouldn’t/shouldn’t have been given his extension last yr. That would make him a RFA this summer.
wow, that was a boo boo.
leaving Brandon twistin’ in the wind might have helped LaMarcus’ contract negotiations too….
Nate broke his Roy toy.
It was pretty well known that Roy had bad knees, even before the contract. Really bad knees.
If I knew it, then they had to know it even more. In KP we trust though, right.
It seems to me that the best course of action
is to shut him down for a few days to give the swelling time to go down. Then re-evaluate, including an MRI (sorry Brandon, I understand clausterphobia sucks, but we have to see what’s going on).
With the “sharp pain” he’s describing it’s possible he has ligament damage or even a bone chip in the knee. If it’s either of these or something else that is treatable, obviously we do it right away. If it turns out that it’s simply a result of the bone on bone, he’s going to have to learn to live with the pain, play when he’s able and sit out when he can’t. This would probably be the most frustrating option for him and the fans since we wouldn’t be able to know what we could get out of him on a game by game basis.
If at some point in the season he reaches a point where major surgery is needed the only way to even try to put a positive spin on it is to realize the liklihood of an owner lock-out next year. The rest of the league might wind up missing time next year as well while he is recovering. And if things go completely sideways it might be time to consider the fact that the owners have already stated they would like the new CBA to allow teams to dump some players, pay the contract, but not have it count towards the salary cap. In this worst case scenario we could drop Roy if his career is over, continue to pay him but have enough flexibility to sign another max player (assuming Allen is willing to take the financial hit).
It all sucks, but we have to be prepared to look at this from a business perspective if necessary.
This just goes to show, no one should have ever gone at Paul Allen.
PA and the vulcans took a lot of heat for dragging the Roy contract out and getting rid of KP/Penn, but since then, it all makes a lot of sense now.
by Coastie07 on Nov 14, 2010 4:38 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Paul Allen is not some know all genius. He's actually been a pretty big failure in a lot of business ventures from what I've heard.
He has Bill Gates to thank for his fortune. I appreciate PA, but lets not forget that he gave huge deals to Darius Miles and Zach Randolph.
by BRoyInThe4th on Nov 14, 2010 10:17 PM PST up reply actions
well I certainly appreciate that is heart is in the right place.
he has to be frustrated. I just hope not TOO frustrated.
Nate broke his Roy toy.
I'd keep playing
I don’t think the hard stuff is going to come down for awhile yet…
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Nov 14, 2010 7:22 PM PST reply actions
If Roy retires for medical reasons, a la Darius Miles
would that give us cap relief??
only if Boston and Memphis
didn’t sign Roy for 10 day contracts and get him into 10 regular season games for short minutes
grrr
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Why if Blazers...
…realize this season is not going to be one you can compete, start already truly resting Roy and have surgery if needed, recover Oden slowly and well, start playing team basketball focusing on the scheme, sharing minutes and developing the young players. Next season you may have developed a good group of serviceable players, a game scheme team oriented, and you will have two key players returning in condition play intermediate/high minutes.
Rudy minutes FTW
Roy's fine
That did not look like a season ending injury much less a career ending injury. He’s struggling with inflammation in the knee. Plenty of players have gone through it. I just think he was having a crappy night and his team was getting thumped and his knee had been aching and it gave him a ping and he decided, “screw it, my knee hurts. I need a rest.” He might need to miss a few games. Blazers schedule has been intense. If you need to worry, worry about Oden.
Quote from Monty
“I just felt bad for him last night, watching him play, because I know him and I’ve seen him when he’s right,” Williams said. “And he’s not even close to that.”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Yeah, I saw that, but I don't think it contradicts what I'm saying
I’m not saying he’s not hurting. I’m just saying he’s coping with nagging inflammation and his sudden exit from the game was probably due to the cumulative weight of several factors and not a career ending injury.
Nah, I'm not joking
It appears that what Roy needs is rest, ice and Advil and the level of panic surrounding his exit from the game is understandable but probably unwarranted. I also read your post and I think second guessing management with the amount of information that we have access to seem premature at a minimum.
Well, like most Blazer fans I do a ton of reading about the knee once one of our players gets hurt. Which
is pretty often. It is getting pretty desperate, and I’ve been reading about stem cell treatments. This is exactly the desperate measures I hope the Blazers organization seriously looks into.
For how important Roy is, if they can possibly use stem cells to grow Roy a meniscus, you have to try it. We have to try something with Roy. I’d be fine if he had to miss the year, if he could get his knees fixed.
We find out if Nate is a coach now...
I’m optomistic… I think the up-tempo, strong D Blazers can make a run this year… Integrating Greg will be easier without BRoy. Expectations are instantly lowered, so they can learn a new system… Nate and Wes are a FINE #2 rotation…. I just think it’ll be interesting… an injury to BRoy is of course not a good thing… but I do see a silver lining…. maybe this team will start to jell….
Miller's going to spread the ball around
and your man AJ is going to have to play, a lot. The 2nd unit will sink or swim based on how fast Armon shows consistency, especially on his reads and outside shooting
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
balanced scoring
I’ve been working my way through the new Blazermania book and one of the characteristics of the ’77-78 teams was they usually had 5 players in double-digits every night. As Wayne Thompson wrote, Walton was never the #1 option on offense. Lucas led the team in scoring, but on any given night it could be a different player. (Bobby Gross led the team with 24 during game 6 against Philly, while checking Dr. J) The main “constant” was 5 or more players in double-digits and a very high number of assists per FG.
I know the league has changed a lot in 30+ years, but as the Pistons showed in ‘04 there’s still a chance that a star-less team can do some damage, as long as they complement each other well, defend hard and rebound. Unfortunately, I’m not sure that the current Blazer backcourt as a group has the chops to be average NBA individual defenders (Johnson is the exception, but he’s still gotta learn the league, Matthews is scrappy but is lacking lateral quickness, Andre has BBIQ but he’s 35 and has to reach because his feet can’t move like they used to)
There’s hope that improved center play will help the guards defend the perimeter, but there are no Lionel Hollins’ or Johnny Davis’ on this roster. I’d settle for a Twardzik or a Steele, at this point.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
well, yeah, we had some good games last year when Roy was out,
of course we had Pryz, which is big. But Camby brings his own nice set of strengths. AJ instead of Bayless is interesting… And Greg ought to be dipping his pinky in the real game pool by Christmas. So something good could happen. This team has taken some heavy body blows this past week, with coach Lucas, and not Brandon’s knee, plus some nasty losses. They should bounce back, as they have done in the past. There is reason for some hope.
Nate broke his Roy toy.
I believe if we can get a grant hill out of roy we will be fine.
We have plenty of offensive options, making brandon rely on his BBIQ over explosiveness is what seperates us from the elite teams.
Derek Fisher – Jason Kidd – Grant Hill – Nash
If he slows down his game and becomes someone who magnifies everyone elses games then we are golden.
But we don’t know yet, we haven’t seen an official injury report. I believe the speculations will end up being worse than the outcome, let him rest. Let him play. I don’t think he will be top caliber night in and night out, but I do think he can still be a focal part of our team and his contribution to our organization has already made him worth every penny.
People were done with the blazers organization until the roy era started.
Give him time.
We get joel back on the 26th. Let’s see how AJ can do.

by 

































