Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Game 11 Preview: Trail Blazers vs. Hornets

Game Time 5:00 Pacific   TV:  KGW

This is going to be quick because I was fulfilling other duties until now (2:00 a.m. local) and have more tomorrow before the game.  

First off, from what I saw of the game against the Thunder it was a much better loss even if being tough.  At least Portland lost honestly with Durant gunning down the stretch and a chance at a game-winner from Rudy.  (Oh how I wish that would have gone in.  It would have brought Fernandez full-circle in his popularity quest.)  Although the Thunder still got too many offensive rebounds the Blazers didn't lose down the stretch from a ridiculous lack of blocking out.

On to the Hornets...

Monty Williams has got New Orleans playing great basketball in the early season.  They've finally capitalized on their defensive potential, ranking second in the league in field goal percentage allowed and first in points allowed.   They're also best in the league at defending the three-point shot.  Their defensive range and commitment will be a challenge to the Blazers.  They're not going to let Portland get away with jumpers, especially since Williams knows all too well that the Blazers don't have a credible inside threat.  They're also a great defensive rebounding team so Portland will have trouble scoring on the put-back.  That means the only viable alternatives are running to shoot before the defense sets up and the cut-pass routine in the halfcourt.  The first might be viable because the Hornets never rebound the ball on their offensive end.  Defensive rebounds should come easy for the Blazers and they could leak out in response.  The second...we'll have to see how seriously the Hornets are about moving their feet.  If you go against guys like Trevor Ariza and Emeka Okafor one-on-one, though, you're probably in for a long night.

On the other end of the floor the Hornets don't shoot a ton of shots but they maximize their opportunities.  They're efficient and have multiple scoring points.  At least some of their success can be attributed to guys like Marco Belinelli, Willy Green, and Marcus Thornton, who have improved playing off of the main threats.  With just about everybody on the roster looking comfortable in the offense defenders haven't been able to key on Chris Paul and David West.  Though neither is putting up huge numbers each shoots near 52%, more important in this new style of ball.  Even Emeka Okafor, hardly the second coming of Patrick Ewing, is shooting 73% on his predictable low-post moves.  Unlike the Peja Stojakovic/Mo Pete/James Posey teams, nobody seems to care who gets the ball or who's going to score over whom.  They run about 23 assists on 37 made shots per game.  They also have some fantastic three-point shooters.  You can't just pick an area and guard it.  You have to cover the whole floor and all five guys.

Though everything has been clicking for New Orleans so far, they're vulnerable if you can hit your shots and score on them.  They're not generating points and if forced to pour in 110 to win they'll be sorely tested.  At the point it becomes Paul and West versus the world this experiment could fall apart...let alone Ariza against the world.  No opponent has scored 100 on the Hornets this year.  The Blazers need to be the first.  They will also need to rebound well and take care of the ball.  Obviously fatigue and emotional health are issues also with Portland having given everything last night, put up some stellar performances, and ended up just a hair short.  The Blazers will need to start well and keep up their energy throughout.   Guys like Rudy Fernandez, Nicolas Batum, and Andre Miller could be key in this game, both applying pressure and producing points.

Hear the New Orleans perspective on this game at At The Hive.

You can see the current Jersey Contest scoreboard here and enter tonight's game (remember the 5:00 start) here.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com) 

Comment 67 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It's going to be a long night

Seems like NOLA is good at all the things the Blazers aren’t. And don’t underestimate the motivation of Williams and Bayless.

by hercher on Nov 13, 2010 6:45 AM PST reply actions  

I look at this to be a low scoring game since

Coach Monty knows all 3 of Nate’s set plays. Regardless, I give Portland a good shot in this one.

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Nov 13, 2010 8:13 AM PST reply actions  

LOL
Coach Monty knows all 3 of Nate’s set plays.

Genius

Kevin Durant won me over when he went Rocky IV on Russia this summer.

by blazeraddict on Nov 13, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

We play the game

*We execute on Offense

*We play in your face defense

*We put up with CP3

*Put it all on the line like we did last night and walk away proud

*If we win hip hip hurrah

*if we lose there is another day

hg

by BBK on Nov 13, 2010 8:32 AM PST reply actions  

nice

last night’s effort is going to be difficult to duplicate, but I think you’ve got it right here.

by damonrayhymer on Nov 13, 2010 8:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Blazers will have a war on their hands

by Jeffrey Thompson on Nov 13, 2010 8:48 AM PST reply actions  

Looking forward to this game,

Hopefully we can end the Hornet win streak.

Check out my music and blog at J-Xile.com

by J-Xile on Nov 13, 2010 8:55 AM PST reply actions  

Wouldn't be surprised

if the Hornets come out flat. It happens sometimes, and to everybody.

by damonrayhymer on Nov 13, 2010 9:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow Kevin Love with a 31 - 31 line

That’s just ridiculous! Even against the Knicks that’s ridiculous. How is that not ridiculous?

by poorwebguy on Nov 13, 2010 9:25 AM PST reply actions  

does this mean we can't get Love on teh blazers now?

we can give them back babbit, give them matthews and take back martell and hometown love? does that work in the trade machine? Maybe not after lasy night. lol

by chimpy_x on Nov 13, 2010 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

one request for Nate (not that it matters)

if Roy is not effective down the stretch don’t play him. Don’t get me wrong he likely will be needed down the stretch but don’t be afraid to use another lineup if it is working. Also I would like to see Roy rested for the entire first half of the 4th. Like the Suns do with Nash… actually with our depth the Suns are a great model as to how to manage minutes. All this injury stuff makes you appreciate LMA. Sure we can pick apart pieces of his game but we can’t deny he is a work horse.

by Escrote on Nov 13, 2010 9:27 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

Agreed completely

and sad to see LMA getting so much flak still. Only way some people will appreciate his game is when we end up playing against him apparently. We may very well have Bayless issues tonight too.

by poorwebguy on Nov 13, 2010 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

not if the Hornets have advance scuts, which I assume they do

because Nate has “thrown the reins” to Andre already this year

the question will be, how well does CP3 defend Andre one-on-one, tonight? If Miller can’t get any traction, this game will go to NO

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

*scouts

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Miller has certainly been given some free rein but not in the fourth when it is close

I am willing to bet if we have any chance of winning it will be close. If the Blazers do the usual iso’s in the fourth, Monty will be so pleased, poised, and ready for the obvious.

by thebigoutdoors on Nov 13, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Good luck Portland

Guys like Rudy Fernandez, Nicolas Batum, and Andre Miller could be key in this game..

What game aren’t these guys key in?

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Nov 13, 2010 9:57 AM PST reply actions  

Nic as the barometer

that theory went out the window last night, unless Dave wants to say (correctly) that Nate held Batum out a little too long in the 4th quarter and let KD get revved up before bringing Frenchy back in

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

what I said last night

is that Rudy, Roy and Miller had been playing well, so Nate stuck with them even after the tide started to turn in the 4th quarter. Batum had also played well (19 points on the bench, finished with 21 after a clutch jumper to cut the lead to 3) and I was wondering as the game clock ran down to 3 minutes why Batum hadn’t been subbed back in, so this isn’t 20/20 hindsight.

If you’re going to use Batum as the barometer, then apply him re: your post game analysis to critical situations as well as entire ballgames. Defensively, his denial of KD in the first game was noteworthy, but Nic was absent from the floor when KD started heating up last night, and it’s difficult to put out a grease fire once it’s ignited.

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Apparently we're talking about two different things

My original assertion was that Batum was the barometer of the offense working well. When he touches the ball a lot things also tend to be clicking. He touched the ball a lot when he was in last night and the offense indeed was clicking. The sense in which you’re trying to apply “barometer” is different. Actually I’m not sure how you’re trying to apply it here, as “barometer” equals “measure of how things are going” and he wasn’t in during the time you’re trying to make him that measure.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 13, 2010 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Was the offense running smoothly while he was out?

and did Nic begin making plays and bringing movement to the offense when he returned? No, and yes

I realize I’m offering you a shift in your original analysis, that’s what I’m (in)famous for. If we’re going to make a player a key to the team’s success, let’s make a point to question to coach if he’s not in the game when the contest is being decided. There’s no doubt that Batum was well-rested during the bulk of the 4th quarter last night.

it’s a stretch, but not a difficult one to make

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree. Rec.

I’ll take it further…Roy should have been benched in crunch time in favor of Batum to guard KD…and Johnson should have been used at least a few minutes to try to slow down Westbrook. Letting these 2 guys combine for 70 is ridiculous.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Nic on KD for sure, denying him the ball, etc

Johnson I’m not ready to agree on, unless it was assured that there would be no subsequent offensive possession. If Nate had a timeout to reinsert Andre and/or Brandon then OK

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah that's the tough call...

…and I understand your reluctance because I’m there with ya. However, in my mind the difference in that game was more Westbrook than Durant and I have to believe that Armon might have been able to get one or two stops…or at least make Westbrook take a tougher shot a couple times and hope for a miss. Instead, Westbrook drove to the hoop like he was on I-84 in the passing lane on a Sunday drive. It was ridiculous watching him torch our team and get to the hoop that easily. With a final score that close, you have to at least wonder if Johnson gets one or two stops maybe that’s the difference in the game….

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Some games the Blazers are better

if Miller and Fernandez are in the background.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 13, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

No

Background…as in not featured heavily in the offense. Bail-out guys.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 13, 2010 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't imagine putting Miller in the background

The Blazer offense seems to often sputter when Miller sits. Do you mean not shooting the ball as being in the background?

by thebigoutdoors on Nov 13, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Yup

I don’t mean sitting at all. I’ve noticed the same thing you have, that the offense has trouble with any other point guard.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 13, 2010 10:51 PM PST up reply actions  

'Dre is better served as a trigger man, not a bail-out guy

Look at the first quarter tonight, nobody else was scoring. Miller sensed that and took it upon himself to keep the score somewhat respectable. Portland may have lost by 30+ if he hadn’t done his Squirmin’ Herman instant offense routine early

The nice thing about Andre is that only does that when he needs to, he’s just as content taking no shots and dropping dimes (like he did to Nic at the beginning of the 3rd quarter) Miller is no wall flower, he’s the team’s best chance at scoring in the paint, whether he penetrates and takes the shot himself or feeds a cutter with a no-look pass

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 14, 2010 12:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Dre is better served

but the TEAM is not better served when Dre is doing that. In fact it usually means Portland is losing and this is the best they can come up with. Seldom does it change a loss into a win.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 14, 2010 9:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Portland is not better served when 'Dre is dropping dimes to teammates for lay-ins?

Dave, what kind of offensive basketball do you think is effective, the kind with PGs shooting from 18-23 feet away from the hoop?

Everyone from Nate on down is going to have to re-evaluate what it takes for Portland to win games going forward, because the 5 year-old Roy-centric paradigm was already changing before Roy hurt himself last night, and now it’s on the shelf—perhaps for good. I’m not saying this with any sense of satisfaction as others have intimated—it’s simple pragmatics. McMillian coaxed the TEAM through a month last winter when Brandon was out with a hamstring pull, but this time a more-permanent arrangement will have to be implemented.

And like it or not, Miller (not LMA) is currently the hub of the Blazer’s wheel, at least until Oden can return to his dominant ways and remain healthy

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 14, 2010 10:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough

Though that is a dynamic that is (hopefully) fading from the Blazers scheme. It is now almost 2 years since Houston showed the futility of a postseason Blazers offense without passing and movement (The Roy offense).

Miller and Fernandez are our best passers and facilitators. ’Nuff said.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Nov 14, 2010 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I hope Rudy brings it tonight

Last night he played well (even put forth some semblance of effort on D, although nobody was stopping anybody) and with ROy hobbled/Wes struggling, his production will be crucial

Kevin Durant won me over when he went Rocky IV on Russia this summer.

by blazeraddict on Nov 13, 2010 10:17 AM PST reply actions  

yes, it will continue to be

but knowing the condition of Fernandez’ back, we certainly don’t want him “carrying” the team

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Armon will cancel out Bayless

AJ is light years ahead of Bayless as a point guard. He shucks and jives and finds the open man but can score when he has the opportunity. He will be able to defend Bayless’s head down, bull in a china shop drives.

Hopefully, the new coaching staff will realize that Monty knows how Nate coaches and implement some new wrinkles. I think they are smart enough to do that.

I would love to be the team to end NO’s win streak. Could happen.

Wesley is still a work in progress. Remember, he’s only second year. When he’s good he’s real good.

LMA is progressing. He made a sweet left hand jump hook at one point. I know it’s not fast enough for a lot of fans, but the team as a whole should be looked at in the big picture. The tendency is to is to evaluate the entire season after each game. The NBA is a game of adjustments and due to all the injuries the Blazers have had to adjust not only to other teams but to their own lineup fluctuations. LMA has gotten the short end of circumstances. Although I agree he could be a little more aggressive. He has shown it at times. He just needs to be consistent.

by davebball on Nov 13, 2010 11:16 AM PST reply actions  

Wesley is still a work in progress. Remember, he’s only second year. When he’s good he’s real good.

Bayless is also a work in progress. It may be his 3rd year but he’s younger than Matthews and has actually played fewer minutes in the NBA than Wesley has, to this point of their young careers

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

fair enough

Bayless could still develop into a decent NBA player, but I was comparing Armon and Bayless in a back up point guard match-up. My Wesley comment was regarding his inconsistent play compared to our high expectations of him.

by davebball on Nov 13, 2010 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm also high on Johnson, and Matthews

During his first 2 seasons and this fall, Bayless was asked to perform the near-impossible, to change his game to suit a risk-averse coach while receiving limited PT to find his way in the league. Jerryd was actually showing improvement, despite the difficult task.

There’s no doubt that AJ will be a better backup PG than JB, in fact, that may be Johnson’s career niche in the NBA. But Bayless was valuable to Portland as a 6th man scorer to bring energy off the bench, and this was especially needed when Roy was hurt last year. So, I don’t compare Rex directly to Armon, even though that was the role that Nate tried to pigeonhole Jerryd into, due to his size and the roster.

Matthews should be a better long-term fit, but Wesley’s currently not providing the punch that Bayless did last year, and I hope that changes soon. (I also hope that Roy and Rudy aren’t both out at the same time, otherwise Bayless will really be missed)

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Couldn't have said it better myself...

…when this offense stalls there is never a better argument for what Bayless brought in terms of ability to get to the rim.

That said, now that Nate seems at least somewhat willing to begrudgingly up the tempo and modify the offense, we may be able to ameliorate Bayless’s absence somewhat. Still, there is no question that with Roy’s knees limiting his burst and rise, this team is sorely lacking ability to get to the rim.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 2:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I also want to add...

…that despite not being happy about dumping Bayless, I understand why the move was made…to clear up the log jam and theoretically open up playing time for Johnson. Yet, if that’s the case, then why the hell isn’t Armon getting more PT? If only for his defensive ability he should be getting ~15 minutes a game.

I’m equally high on Johnson and Mathews…but am perplexed why Armon isn’t getting steady, crunch time minutes especially when he is the only guy on the team who can match up defensively with the other team’s point guard.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 2:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Because he's a rookie

Armon has really impressed the coaching staff, but these guys are old-school. The same ting happened last year when Nate consistently went with Juwan Howard over Dante (especially during the playoffs).

I do think that as Armon figures things out more and more, he’s likely to get more time and a longer leash from Nate, like Sloan did with Wesley last season.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Nov 13, 2010 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Nate may be old-school...

…but what Westbrook did to us is called “an old fashioned butt-kickin”. ;) I think the coaching staff needs to be flexible enough within their dogma to make substitution patterns as game conditions change. Westbrook going crazy and blowing by everyone on the team time after time after time should have necessitated that Armon at least get a chance to slow him down. You have to figure Armon might have made 2 or 3 of those shots he made a litle harder, maybe even causing him to miss. In a game that close, that’s all it would take to win is one or two stops.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 5:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Care to make Predictions?

On how many Bayless scores tonight? We’re soft in the middle right now, and we all know how he likes to drive.
I’m going…12. Much more than that and I think we’ll be in trouble.

Wanted: A MEANER Blazer attitude! Knock somebody down and step on him!

The L*kers, The Heat, and The Thunder...the New AXIS of EVIL.

by CaptHustle on Nov 13, 2010 11:48 AM PST reply actions  

I'll say 18

He wants to get back at the Blazers for trading him and the way he knows to do that is to score. Even so, if we lose, I don’t think it will be because of Bayless.

by davebball on Nov 13, 2010 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I just hope he doesn't run into Roy or Rudy and hurt them

ditto Camby and Nic

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 13, 2010 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Please, please Nate play Pryzbilla TONIGHT!

We need to play Pryzbilla 10-15 minutes off the bench. What a difference that would make!

( Isn’t that being cautious enough?) Or is it better to continue to loose close games that a true center could make a huge difference even for just 12 minutes a game. ( I think we would have beat OKC both games if we would have used this approach.)

"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."

by SurReal on Nov 13, 2010 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

My fear...

with the recent losses to The Thunder is just setting precedence.

I’ve seen it work the other way with The Blazers in the past. But sometimes a team that is close or equal to you in talent, and close in N.B.A. ranking can gain an advantage with just a couple of close wins.

Pretty soon they start to think they have your number.
Pretty soon you start to fear that they have your number.

It’s too bad The Blazers lost this one…or did not win at home….from a psychological standpoint, you at least want to trade blows…obviously 2 attempts and currently The Blazers are 0-2. This is NOT a “better” loss….it’s a loss.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Nov 13, 2010 2:38 PM PST reply actions  

Yep.

People who claim that early games don’t matter probably don’t have a lot of playing experience themselves. Early games most definitely matter due to the psychological and strategic effects of both team and individual match-ups.

Anyone who thinks it doesn’t matter to our guys that Westbrook & Durant dropped 36 & 34 on us respectively, and they pretty much took over the game while we made a limp-wristed attempt to defend these guys isn’t paying attention. Batum should have been matched up with Durant more consistently in the 4th and Johnson shouldn’t have been riding pine the whole 2nd half.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions  

We have no chance

We’re on the road, taking on a 7-0 team. They just suffered yet another heartbreaking loss against OKC and our two best players are still broken.

Really hope Oden returns this season. I don’t see this team making the playoffs, the way its been playing.

by Lamrock on Nov 13, 2010 3:16 PM PST reply actions  

I actually think we can win this game...

…despite their record I’m still not on the NO band-wagon.

On the bigger picture, however, I’d agree…

Greg Oden blossoming into one of the 3 best Centers in the NBA has all of a sudden taken on a huge importance.

And what exactly has Cho done since he’s been here?

Hmmm…well, he jettisoned an explosive shooting Guard in Bayless, whom we could really use right now instead of Roy.

by mjswoosh on Nov 13, 2010 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

How do you get to the KGW game stream?

Does a link just show up on their site right around game-time? Is there a permanent html link?

Thanks, and sorry for the dumb question.

by lyleleander on Nov 13, 2010 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm