Game 48 Recap: Blazers 100, Rockets 104
Long Story Short: The Blazers make it an interesting affair with great first-quarter hustle and heroic fourth-quarter shooting but the Rockets' power-packed defense proves too much in the critical moments.
The Game:
When the Blazers started the game missing a couple of long jumpers and a layup you figured that this was going to be another long, struggling comeback attempt much as the recent New Orleans and Utah entailed. When Trevor Ariza and Aaron Brooks combined for 7 points in less than 2 minutes you wondered if it was going to be a contest at all. But fear not, Blazer fans! Your heroes shut off the spigot at that point, getting hands in faces and forcing the Rockets to choose between difficult shots and long ones, neither of which fall within their proficiency range. On the other end Portland woke up from its season-long slumber and realized that, despite all the injuries, it had a potent 6'10" scorer in the lineup. LaMarcus Aldridge started spanking the Rockets from mid-range with a couple of lane attempts thrown in for spice. Jerryd Bayless assisted in the flurry early and Steve Blake late. The Rockets countered with a little Aaron Brooks but he only scored 8 in the quarter while Aldridge netted 12. LMA's supporting cast was better offensively as well and the Blazers walked out of the quarter with a 28-18 lead, just the prescription for a team that had lost its first quarters for the last month or so straight. They did it with smart offense, lane-protecting defense, and most of all hustle. It was an ovation-worthy performance.
Unfortunately the game did not end after the first quarter and the second and third acts of this play were not as joyful for the good guys. The Blazers soon discovered that trying to outhustle the Rockets is like trying to beat Ben Golliver in a Speedos contest. Even on your best night it's not going to happen, chump. The Rockets wiped off their bloody noses, grimaces, and began clamping down on the Blazers hard. Portland players still scored, but they either had to be lightning quick on their move or shoot from way out. Portland had to elude Houston's defense rather than beat it. Fernandez and Batum filled the quickness role, Blake the range. But even between them it wasn't enough. Houston guards Brooks and Kyle Lowry started making mincemeat out of the Blazers' defense. The Blazers threw a zone to keep inside scoring down but both of the small Houston guards just ran right through the seams. Man-to-man wasn't doing any better. Those two accounted for 20 of the Rockets' 31 points in the quarter. The Blazers scored but 19. When the dust cleared Houston led by 2 at the break. The magnificent first quarter was history.
The third period saw both teams settle into form. The energy was up. The tempo was brisk. They went at it tooth and nail. Aaron Brooks started the period looking to score but when Portland got distracted by him Luis Scola and Chuck Hayes, heretofore quiet, started converting layup after layup. The Rockets continued to rely on Scola and Brooks. The Blazers went with the pot pourri approach, drawing points from Bayless, Dante Cunningham, Nicolas Batum, and Aldridge. Unfortunately the Houston offense had a sweeter aroma and their lead was 11 with 3 minutes remaining in the period. That's when Rudy Fernandez and Steve Blake started shooting the lights out from three. In a little over a minute they combined for 3 triples, cutting the lead back to 3. Unfortunately in the last minute Scola and Brooks put punctuation marks on their period, each scoring once, and the Houston lead was 7 going into the fourth.
You have to give the Blazers credit. They came out strong in the final period. Juwan Howard got a couple of shots off of nice passes. Steve Blake splashed another jumper. All of a sudden the lead was 4. LaMarcus Aldridge and Nicolas Batum chipped in a few. On the other side it was a scene straight out of the classic Star Trek episode "Return of the Archons"...the one where that puritan society was controlled by a supercomputer? "All hail Landry. The Will of Landry shall be done! Do not speak evil of Landry!" Oh wait...that was Landru, wasn't it? Same difference. The guy was infallible in the fourth. He zapped us with his scoring stick of doom. Dunks, layups, jumpers, free throws...he did them all to the tune of 15 points in the period. As the clock wound down Rudy Fernandez set his phasers on "Three", draining 3 of them in the closing 3 minutes plus a couple of free throws besides. Meanwhile the Rockets left the door open by missing 4 of the final 7 free throws the Blazers awarded them while trying to play catch-up. Between Rudy's marksmanship and the Rockets' charity-stripe bungling the gap got closer and closer. With 8 seconds left Rudy drained the last of his threes to cut the lead to 100-102. With 7 seconds left Landry went to the line to put the game away. He hit the first, 100-103. But he missed the second! But the rebound caromed long and the Blazer guards didn't cover well. For what seems about the millionth time in the last month Portland blows a critical rebound on a free throw late in the game and the Rockets ice it by hitting a final free throw. The quote from Dave's living room was exactly this: "Come on, Landry, miss the shot! But if he does we better...AWWWWW #$%@#@!!!" 104-100, Houston. Good game...still a loss.
Portland righted the ship offensively tonight, staying close to the Rockets in field goal percentage (46.7-45.7, Houston) and draining 38.1% of their threes. They got outrebounded by 4 but they also shot 6 more attempts than Houston which adds up to a decent rebounding effort overall. The ball moved quickly for the Blazers all night, a necessary component of any offense versus Houston. The tempo stayed up for the most part. The Blazers got 25 assists as a result, all to the good. But Portland got killed on the interior in a couple ways. Houston had 52 points in the paint to Portland's 32. Houston shot 43 free throws to Portland's 21, accounting for a +11 point margin for the Rockets. Given those stats it's even more impressive Portland hung close. You can tell the shots they got, though longer than Houston's, were good ones. Once again the Blazers had no answer for Aaron Brooks and once again the flailing he caused on Portland's part left opportunities open for Houston's forwards. It was a typical Portland-Houston matchup that way. We'd have 6 more wins and a second-round playoff berth to our name over the last couple of years had we just drafted Brooks.
Individual Observations
Even though LaMarcus Aldridge scored 20 points versus 25 against Utah I liked this game from him better. He recognized the double-teams better and dealt with them by passing to the right spot most of the time. He got in the lane more and looked more active on defense. 20 points, 7 rebounds, 4 blocks.
Rudy Fernandez made up for his recent woes by getting hotter than Lindsay Lohan's spoon tonight. (Yes, I'm feeling snarky and grumpy because of the loss.) Rudy hit 5-6 threes, 9-14 overall for 25 points, 5 rebounds, and 3 assists. I like aggressive Rudy.
Speaking of aggressive, Nicolas Batum was at it again. And by "at it" I mean a full-on assault on the court in nearly every way imaginable. He moves his feet so quickly on defense you forget that he's playing defense because it doesn't look like he's working. He hit 4-7 shots for 12 points. Oh, he also had 9 rebounds. Oh, he also had 5 assists. All of this happened in 28 minutes. Plus I think his shoulder wrap looks cool and should become a standard part of the uniform for all Blazers.
Steve Blake looked like he really, really wanted to play in this game after his putrid showing Wednesday night. He not only moved fast, he shot and passed decisively. 6-10 overall, 2-4 from distance, 14 points, 9 assists. He can alley-oop a little too.
Dante Cunningham hit 3-6 shots in 16 minutes but also picked up 5 fouls. Juwan Howard hit 3-6 shots in 35 minutes and also picked up 6 rebounds. Juwan says: Don't do what Dante Don't does.
Jeff Pendergraph had 2 personal fouls in his 3 minutes of playing time. He didn't listen to Juwan.
Andre Miller and Martell Webster had ouchy nights. Miller went 1-6 for 2 points with 3 assists in 21 minutes. His main claim to fame was 3 offensive rebounds, more than any other Blazer. Webster went 1-7, 0-5 from distance, for 2 points in 21 minutes also.
Final Thoughts
When's Brandon coming back? Tomorrow? Huh? Tomorrow? Is he coming back tomorrow? I'm just going to close my eyes and when I open them you can tell me he's coming back tomorrow, OK? Tomorrow is Saturday, you know. Saturday rhymes with "Brandon", you know. Well, not really, but they both have that short "a" sound. We can re-name it "Brandonday" if he'll come back. I'll check Travelocity for fares to Dallas if you want me to. Do you need a hotel and car too, Brandon? Because I can get you a discount if you do...
Read about the Houston win at TheDreamShake
Check out your Jersey Contest score here and enter tomorrow's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
twss
I hope Brandon, Nic, and Rudy can work up a little post-asg run..
by galacticlove on Jan 29, 2010 11:14 PM PST up reply actions
I was at the game tonight.
I sat 4th row on the baseline near the 3 pt line opposite the blazers bench. I was the "Free Throw Guy" tonight for our guys. I yelled out loud "MISS IT!!" right before the Rockets would shoot their free throw. I only did this a few times in the third and fourth quarters. And twice for their last two free throws of the game.
The first time I did it, Carl Laundry, a real good free throw shooter missed one, and the second time I did it, Ariza missed one. But, of course they made those last two free throws.
The Rocket fans were freaking out, and me and my daughter were cracking up because those first two times, it seemed to be working.
Clyde the Glide, the greatest player ever
Cliff Robinson got mad at my brother who was trying to sell him a cellphone when my brother called him Uncle Cliffy. Apparently, he doesn't like that name very much.
by BeaumontTXBlazerFan on Jan 29, 2010 10:19 PM PST reply actions
Yeah, they were playfully yelling at me for doing that.
Clyde the Glide, the greatest player ever
Cliff Robinson got mad at my brother who was trying to sell him a cellphone when my brother called him Uncle Cliffy. Apparently, he doesn't like that name very much.
by BeaumontTXBlazerFan on Jan 29, 2010 10:45 PM PST up reply actions
I saw you. Security was looking very interested in moving you out.
Joking of course, but I sat about 8 feet behind the Trailblazer bench tonight. It was fun, but I like Portland (want to beat them but like them) and so I couldn’t really hate the way I would if it was Utah, or LA, or possibly Dallas.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Lol did you?
I wonder if the players heard me yell. Surely they could, but watching the replay of the game, I can’t hear me.
Clyde the Glide, the greatest player ever
Cliff Robinson got mad at my brother who was trying to sell him a cellphone when my brother called him Uncle Cliffy. Apparently, he doesn't like that name very much.
by BeaumontTXBlazerFan on Jan 30, 2010 12:19 AM PST up reply actions
I could see some people cheering against Rockets FTs.
Those mics are very directional to pickup noise from the court, so you’d have to be bellowing to be heard over the background noise.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
btw what about Bayless?
I'm drawing a total blank.
by collectiveshane on Jan 29, 2010 10:28 PM PST reply actions
He's going to be good. Even he isn't quick enough to stay with Brooks, though.
Putting Batum on Brooks was interesting and pretty effective.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
that’s because Nic Batum is a beast.t
#52 #10 #25 #7
by Cablinasian on Jan 30, 2010 12:25 PM PST up reply actions
Yes, and briefly, a Rocket.
We could use him. He’s going to be the perfect version of Trevor Ariza, I think.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
interesting comparable
We will know for sure if he suddenly swats Rudy out of the sky in practice
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Jan 30, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
not a bad comparison stylistically. The exciting thing is that he has a natural basketball sense and handles that Ariza still doesn’t have, so he may be able to step into the higher-usage role with more success than Ariza.
He is just such a smart kid, basketball-wise. Thinking the game is incredibly cool in an athletic marvel.
#52 #10 #25 #7
Steve Blake played really good tonight.
Yeah, he messed up in the deciding minutes, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.
Travis Outlaw fan from the beginning.
After his excellent game and the Webster chuck fest? I'd do it tomorrow.
Seriously, I was close enough to see in the first half that Webster shot just wasn’t going to fall. It looked bad.
His follow up dunk, though, was a thing of vicious beauty.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Nic is killing it so far
He looks like the perfect SF to complement Brandon Roy and (just maybe) a future borderline all star. Despite the losses, these last two games have been very, very encouraging for the Blazers’ future.
If Batum develops into what he looks like he can be, and Oden stays healthy, who cares about the point guard – this team will be unstoppable.
I say start Nic whenever Roy comes back.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Jan 30, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions
borderline? If Nic Batum keeps this up...hopefully McMillan will let him play to his potential
he will be an all star. No doubt. NONE
I Was There Tonight II
Very entertaining game. Nicolas is going to be an All-Star. Very soon. His reaction to the poorly thrown lob was breathtaking. What great body control in mid-air to redirect the ball into the basket. “Wow!” That’s a direct quote from the Rockets’ fans around me. I second that emotion.
by Original Blazer Fan on Jan 29, 2010 11:28 PM PST reply actions
I think McMillan is more analogous to Landru
He wants an orderly mechanical game plan for his players but doesn’t see that it won’t promote actual player growth.
I watched the same game as Mike and Mike but came to some different conclusions.
Nate was clearly out coached again. The team is regressing back to how it played early in the season where there was uncertainty about roles, minutes, and the ever present worry about the hook.
Blake running around in a frenetic pace is not a improvement to Miller. It’s being confused with an actual effective game plan. He hit some outside shots. He missed some outside shots. How many free throw attempts does he have for the year?
Memo to Nate: Why are you blaming Miller for the team’s poor showing recently by over playing Blake? You still didn’t get a win. It’s a poor worker that blames his tools. Having Roy bail you out time and again from your poor game plan is not serving you well now. Let’s see, earlier this year you tried coaching by a chart. Now you’re trying to coach by feel – at least that’s what the announcers were saying. But I’ll give you credit: if you’re trying to design a game plan so that Miller has the least amount of chance for success, you’re doing okay. What a waste.
If memory serves, early this season Blake was starting and when the Blazers began to struggle, he was given even more minutes. Now Miller is starting and the Blazers have had a couple of bad games. Give Miller more minutes? No, keep him on the bench. Hmmm…looks like a bit of player favoritism to me. What a way to reward one of the best point guards in the game.
Batum is a help to whatever unit he’s on. He should start.
I was about to start eating some of the words (and happy to do so) that I wrote in previous posts about Aldridge because of his play in the first half – until the second half happened.
30th in the league in points-in-the-paint. That’s last. That reflects the coaches’ philosophy. That’s not gonna win a championship.
Howard, Cunningham, Pendergraph
I love them all, love the effort but that is not the frontline that is going to win very many games in the NBA over the course of an 82 game season and it is starting to show. A few minutes for these guys with Aldridge or Oden or Joel on the court with them and they would be effective energy guys who each bring a little different game to the court. But having to play them extended minutes with a tired Aldridge is going to get the Blazers games like the last three, close and maybe a chance to win but undermanned. In two or three years, DC and Pendergraph might be able to match up better with Scola/Landry/Hayes/Millsap/Okur/West/Okafor but they just don’t have the experience make a big enough impact yet.
The real story here is that Portland was even in this game. They looked like they were gathering themselves for a burst and would make a run and then would peter out and look like they were going to fade and then gather themselves again. They need some bodies back.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
Blake had a great game
14 points, 9 assists, +2. How can you hate on Blake for a game where he was doing so well?
"Rudy is not everyday a shooter," Fernandez said. "He's defense. He's passes. He's assists."
I now look for rockman's posts
to see what reasons he gives for blaming Nate this time.
Miller has had 3 bad games in a row. The last two were atrocious.
Last game, Blake played poorly and got 11 minutes. This game, he was shooting well, and had 14 points and 9 assists in 26 minutes. Andre had 21 minutes in which he produced 3 assists, 2 turnovers, and went 1 for 6 for 2 points. He drew not a single free throw. He didn’t penetrate the lane. He didn’t successful post anyone up. He didn’t do anything.
Andre is a very, very good player, but this was definitely a game for him to take a seat. He was playing horrible and the guy behind him was playing well.
We get it. You hate Blake and you hate McMillan. That is the main theme of every postgame post from you.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I'm glad your reading my comments and it's great if you disagree (jscot and anyone else)
Believe it or not, I don’t hate either Blake or McMillan. I just try to look beyond the propaganda and team party line. I try to look for trends and root causes of issues. If I’m wrong, so be it. I’ve had 50 years practical experience on the planet. I’ve watched the Blazers for 34 years. I’ve seen a lot of players and coaches come and go. I’ve seen what works and what doesn’t. It doesn’t ruin my day if a player has a bad game or two. I don’t blame the coach if the other team is better or if I feel the coach doesn’t have players good enough to produce many wins.
As for Blake. He plays hard. I don’t recall ever criticizing him for that. My comments are directed at what you get out of a player over time. And hopefully never at someone as a person. Sure, there are game to game situations where it might be better to use one player over another. Blake’s not a bad player. Sure, he’s capable of having a great game as is anyone in the NBA. My line of reasoning is that he’s not a good enough player over time to be on the court as much as he is considering the other players there are on the squad. That speaks to other issues. Like Nate McMillan.
Nate’ a good coach. I prefer him hands down over say, Isiah Thomas. But I haven’t seen where he’s a great coach. With the players that KP has been able to acquire, almost any coach could have improved the won-loss record from the 21 win season (well maybe not Isiah Thomas). I think the 54 wins and a first round exit might be as much as we’ll see out of him. The following is my reasoning. First, Roy is a great player but he’s not good enough to win a championship all by himself with four role players. The Blazers need as least two or three other really good players. Under most normal circumstances, these players are then going to need minutes and the ball to be effective. This is where the coach factors into the discussion. How do you mesh players good enough to help win a championship with Roy? McMillan has made his whole game plan revolve around Roy. Players good enough to help win a championship are not going to want to revolve around Roy. Players good enough to help win a championship may also be go-to guys. They may be perfectly happy to play with Roy, but not revolve around him. They’re going to want to be involved themselves. It’s only natural. Can Roy be happy with that? In other words, Roy’s role may have to be lessened to accommodate players good enough to help win a championship. This is McMillan’s dilemma. I don’t see him making any adjustments to a long term reality. Blake being out on the court is a symptom of that. If it happened a couple of times, no big deal. But it happens all the time. I see it all the time. I comment on it all the time.
This brings me back to Blake. If all you like is seeing Roy, great. Blake is the player for you. Blake is the perfect complimentary role player for Roy. Roy makes Blake’s game so much better. He defers to Roy. But that combination is not going to win a championship. I’ve seen one championship. It’s an indescribable feeling. Which is what this exercise is all about. Once again, if you disagree, great.
This is what I see. Maybe my writing style makes it sound like hate. Have you never been angry or frustrated with someone, or see someone doing something that you feel is wrong, told him or her that, yet not hated them as a person?
Instead of yelling about what a ‘hater’ I am, post your own line of reasoning for all to see and let it stand up to to be critiqued. Prove me wrong.
Dude, look at the stat line
Miller was not on at all tonight. I like Miller and think he is one of the best additions we have done. But there is a lot of supposition in your comments on a game that the stat line concurs with sitting Miller. When I see that stat line and those minutes, I winder about Millers ankles
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 30, 2010 7:24 AM PST up reply actions
I agree. Miller may have some injury that he is not talking about. Let him rest and get better.
I just hope Nate let’s him play his game when he IS on!!! I don’t fully trust McMillan after what he did earlier this season though. It is hard for people to change.
I wonder about lack of cutters for Miller to pass to
Miller has not been shooting very good in the last few games, but he would be a lot more effective if somebody actually moved on the offense towards the hoop.
We have so many dudes hanging around the edges Miller has nobody to work with when he drives. It makes Miller look bad, and I argue unfairly.
Very good point. A friend who is from Chicago went to our games with me this past week.
She said..there is only one person moving…why are they just STANDING there? Meaning the 2 guys camped in the corners…the Blazers need to MOVE on offense…off the ball!!!! Rudy does and Nic does…how long before Nate squelches THAT?!!!!
(the Nic part…Rudy moves regardless…hope Nic does the same.)
Blake in crunch time
No D, turned the ball over at key times.
Why not have Andre in there in the last 6 minutes? Nate’s maintaining his C on the season from me.
Blake plays better Team D than Andre..
Better to have him in at the end. If you mean his D on Brooks was bad.. I got news for you… NO ONE was staying with Brooks on a night like that. Kid has some jets. … and before you get started … yeah Bayless is faster… but he got burned several times tonight too. I thought Blake had a great all around game.
I loved watching Rudy’s fire and Batum’s D in this game.. there are some good things happening for the Blazers right now… winning just doesn’t happen to be one of them.
RoadBlazer
Which really speaks of some of the worst guard deffense in the league
Let’s face it when Blake is in the game, he is usually the first guy that gets attacked. Everybody else tries to cover for him, which leaves other guys wide open.
Not to say Miller or Bayless are any better. Just pointing out the obvious.
Yes, Blake has a good shooting night here and there. I’m not impressed- as his opponent usually has a much better game.
No single player can guard brook-like point guards
They are going to eat you up 9 times out of 10. You have to have a very good team defensive scheme to slow them down. Push them to help, double team them, and make sure to make proper rotations when they give up the ball. The best you can hope to do is take away the spots they want to get to and make them improvise. As much talk as there is about Jerryd becoming a great on ball defender, he isnt going to stop the elite pg’s of the league without a lot of help from the other players on the floor.
If you are talking about trying to slow a guy like Brooks down with a one on one defender, I much prefer a tall, lanky player like Batum. He can afford to sag off a little bit more than a guy like Bayless and has a better chance of recovering and making a play from behind once he inevitably gets beat off the dribble…
RUDY > MJ
Trade for Dalembert
Not even a mention of an absent second half from LaMarcus?
I too loved his play the first half. He was aggressive attacking the basket getting calls. But the black Houdini came back with another disappearing act.
by ODEN on a stick on Jan 30, 2010 4:23 AM PST reply actions
meh, we've all seen it too many times to be shocked
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 30, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions
LA was double-teamed in the 2nd half
Do you want the guy to try to make his moves with two guys on him? You are supposed to kick out the ball to the open man. LA did that.
I don’t like the way Nate uses LA, but I thought he played a smart game. If you want more out of LA in the second half, you have to get him different looks. Houston adjusted, the Blazers didn’t.
Notice that once I cut back on complaining about Miller that his game went in the tank?
It’s one of the few times that it sucks to be right, even though I am always right.
THAT'S the problem
I wondered. I thought it was because KP said we didn’t want to trade him.
I think Andre was playing out of his skin so someone else would want him, and he’s tanking now that he’s stuck in Portland.
See, I can do the crazy hate stuff too, if I put my mind to it. It doesn’t come naturally, but I’m learning.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
It took me 3 years to start hating
Once I learned to do it, it turned out to be lots of fun. Rudy needs a hater.
I thot the Other teams Post Players that keep laying wood on him
Were his real Haters.
LOL, he doesn’t get enough minutes to expose his weaknesses or take minutes from other peoples favorites. He is in the “Unhatable” Mode.
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 30, 2010 7:27 AM PST up reply actions
Not really hating...
But, I do wish he would convert some more shots. Perhaps he needs to slow down just a smidge? I dunno. But it is a lot like last year where he came on and then other teams started letting him drive and miss shots rather than foul him…
Oh! Wait! His haters are the Refs. Lots of ticky tack fouls as he fights thru screens
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 30, 2010 7:40 AM PST up reply actions
I would like to see him learn a teardrop ..
as an option to Hammering the rim.
He had one last night
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Jan 31, 2010 2:29 PM PST up reply actions
you'd have to bag on the rest of the team too, because they've ALL been in the tank
with the exception of maybe Batum.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 30, 2010 9:37 AM PST up reply actions
The Dreamshake wrap-up is worth reading
http://www.thedreamshake.com/2010/1/30/1284141/thoughts-on-game-46-rockets-104
Their guy was at the game, right behind the Portland bench, and has a lot to say about various Blazers and about seeing the game so close-up vs. on TV. Check it out.
Nice write-up there
Not often you see the other team’s blogger give almost equal face time to the Blazers.
LOL
Rudy “The flying Squirrel” Fernandez? I like it. Apparently all it takes is 1 rec for your comment to go green over there. Kind of funny….
RUDY > MJ
Trade for Dalembert
Did we really need this?
The Blazers soon discovered that trying to outhustle the Rockets is like trying to beat Ben Golliver in a Speedos contest. Even on your best night it’s not going to happen, chump.
I did laugh, though. :)
Outmanned, outworked, outcoached = loss
I wish we had a player other than Roy who could score reliably late in games.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
You mean a guy that can score with his other teammates standing around?
The slow, methodical Blazer offense grinds to an even slower pace in the 4th. As the defense tightens and takes away options 1 and 2, the Blazers have nothing.
A good offensive team would find the weakness in the defense. Our only hope in the 4th is for somebody to get hot from long. Which percentage-wise is not a good option consistently.
Meanwhile Houston gets Landry dunking .

by 






















