Media Row Report: Blazers 95, Jazz 106
A well-coached contender thrashed a mish-mashed pretender tonight at the Rose Garden. The Utah Jazz dominated the Portland Trail Blazers, never trailing as they coasted to a 106-95 road victory against a major division rival.
While the Blazers and Jazz stand virtually even in the conference standings, from the outset it felt like a meeting of two teams heading very different directions. Utah played like a juggernaut, running over and through a Blazers team that was too busy rolling over to know what hit it. The Jazz came out looking for a fight and executed their crisp offense to near-perfection. They built improbable leads of 12-0 and 21-2 before finishing the quarter up 37-16 on a free throw granted due to a frustration technical foul on Jerryd Bayless. The statistical differences in that first quarter were eye-popping. 82.4% from the field for the Jazz; 25.0% for the Blazers. 11 assists for the Jazz; 3 for the Blazers. 14 free throw attempts for the Jazz; 1 for the Blazers.
It was that foul disparity and a no-call on a truly sublime fast break dunk by Nicolas Batum over Kyle Korver that led to the technical on Bayless and the loudest, longest booing from the Rose Garden crowd this season. During the break between the first and second quarters, the jumbotron played a video montage of various Blazers from the 1980s talking about their memories of Portland. "It's such a special place to play because the fans are so passionate about it," Kiki Vandeweghe noted, his words barely audible above the crowd's merciless booing of the refs. I couldn't make up this stuff if I was trying.
Batum's dunk was by far the night's most memorable moment for the Blazers. As he raced out in transition Korver trailed in hot pursuit. Korver timed his jump well and the two players met in the air with some force but Batum was stretched out high enough above the rim to flush the ball cleanly with his right hand before tumbling to the ground. If ever there was an appropriate time for the Scottie Pippen comparisons (and I'm not sure there is), it was this play.
After the game, Batum told me that the referee admitted to him during the second half that he had missed the call. "The referee made a mistake. He apologized to me after. He told me he watched the tape at halftime and said 'ok, my bad, [it was a foul].' I went up and got hit. I got up, it's not a big deal." Asked whether he thought his finish might make SportsCenter as have his previous dunks over Pau Gasol of the Lakers, Batum smiled but said exactly what you would like to hear after a somewhat embarrasing loss, "I don't know... I don't care."
Interestingly, on the way out of the locker room Batum told me that it was a "good thing" he was wearing a sleeve on his shoulder because it restricts him from a full range of motion. Specifically, Batum demonstrated how the sleeve prevents him from over-cocking his shoulder back during violent dunk attempts and potentially causing himself future discomfort. Although he doesn't like the sleeve in general he clearly realizes its value in this particular situation because, you know, trying to dunk too viciously could be a reoccurring problem that he might not be able to control by himself.
If you weren't in love with this guy before you should be now.
Unfortunately, the airborne contact from Korver wasn't even the hardest shot Batum took in the quarter. Earlier, Jazz power forward Carlos Boozer noticeably leaned into Batum while setting a hard pick, hitting him directly on his right, recovering shoulder. Asked if he felt the foul was intentional, Batum said, " I don't know." He was careful to note, "I was surprised [after the play] because my shoulder reacted great. I had no pain."
No pain indeed. Batum finished the half 7 for 7 from the field for 16 points. "I didn't think he was ever going to miss," Jazz coach Jerry Sloan told me after the game. "We better guard him. He did a great job of coming off the baseline on the pindowns and stuff, got himself wide open. We didn't even get close to him to start the game."
On the defensive end, Batum guarded Jazz point guard Deron Williams for stretches, with mixed but mostly positive results. "He's a big, long guy," Sloan told me. "He takes up a lot of space. That's just part of basketball. Deron was able to beat him a time or two and I think that put him back on his heels a little bit." Nate McMillan agreed, "Defensively, the second half he was able to do a pretty decent job of controlling Williams."
True to my hope on Monday night, Batum saw his minutes ramp up nicely. He played 26 minutes tonight, including major burn in the fourth quarter. In that time, Batum displayed the aforementioned athleticism, defensive intensity, sophistication and some next-level vision on offense, anticipating angles and hitting cutters that the average Blazer doesn't even see. Put all of that together and it's a recipe for a solid 4th quarter player. I asked McMIllan if Batum has the fourth quarter mentality that coaches often look for, but he deflected the question. He explained that Batum's fourth quarter minutes tonight were simply the result of his earlier play. "He was playing well defensively. He had made some shots. And I just stuck with him."
Keep sticking with him.
The Blazers -- both the players and the organization -- do all sorts of charity work but tonight was a bit different. Before the game, Martell Webster announced that he would donate $1,000 for every point he scored against the Jazz to the ongoing relief effort in Haiti. Webster finished with 14 points. After the game he told reporters that he wasn't satisfied with his scoring or his donation...
"I should be donating a lot more right now than I am. Tonight was definitely special. Not seeing those shots going in in the first half not only hurt me but the fact that what my goal was tonight, which was to score as many points as I could. To start to help the people over in Haiti. Fell a little short, wish I could have knocked down a couple more shots."
So you're not done donating?
"No, no. I might not be. I might do it again."
How did you come up with the idea?
"My agency had talked about it. At first I just wanted to do it through my foundation. I didn't want anybody to know about it. Actually that's what I did. People in my foundation, people on the board, we all came up to do it with the Utah game. Just wish I could have had some more points."
It's a well-known fact that NBA players get hit up for money by family members, long-lost friends and groupies on a regular basis. But thanks to their big-dollar contracts, they are regular targets for potential charity donations as well. I asked Webster what made Haiti stand out as the cause for him.
"It's a time of crisis over there right now. It has nothing to do with me. It has to do with the situation. I'm fortunate to be in a situation to be able to give some relief and what better way to incorporate it into my profession. That's the reason why I came up with the idea."
Did you hear about it on television or read about it online?
"Yeah. Yeah. I heard about it online quite a bit. It's sad, man. It's sad. We have to be there to aid. Us guys that are in that position. Why not?"
So you've talked with your teammates about donating as well?
"Yeah. Definitely. Juwan is giving some money. LA [too]. I haven't really asked around except for those two people. It's for a great cause, man, it's for a great cause."
January continues to be the best month of Webster's career.
Random Game Notes
- The Blazers sent out the following notice about Brandon Roy: "He will miss the next two games and will not travel with the team to Texas. He will be re-evaluated Monday." The Blazers play Houston on Friday and Dallas on Saturday. They also play Monday night at home against Charlotte before going to Utah on Wednesday. Roy will know Thursday whether or not he made the All Star game.
- Backlash against the Willamette Week writer who chose to inform Greg Oden during his Tuesday press conference that his genitals had "impressed" a lot of people has been fast and furious, both on the internet today and at the Rose Garden tonight. Multiple media members labeled the question "sexual harassment" and one suggested that the paper issue an apology in addition to the not clever at all "apology" already issued by the writer. "Pathetic" and "Disgusting" were terms thrown out at various points tonight and media members who have been around the team far, far, far longer than I said they had never seen or heard anything like it. Perhaps the most interesting voice to comment about the question was Kristen Blake, Steve's wife, who let me know on twitter that she found it "inappropriate and unprofessional."
- Karma reared its head this afternoon as the Willamette Week's website crashed, temporarily preventing people from reading the writer's take on last night's press conference. Unfortunately, it is believed that the site crash was caused by too much traffic generated by that story. Hopefully, WW doesn't interpret this as a potential new business model and manages to successfully resist the temptation to send a writer to every Blazers press conference to compliment players on their genitals. Hopefully.
- Jerryd Bayless went straight to the locker room after fouling out in the game's final moments, favoring the ankle he injured on the team's most recent road trip. After the game, Bayless told me that the ankle is "fine" and that he expects to practice tomorrow and play on Friday night in Houston. He said he would "have to ice it" but that was the extent of the treatment it would receive. He was in a cross mood tonight as he often is after losses.
- Tonight was "80s Night" at the Rose Garden, continuing the tradition of celebrating each decade of the organization's existence. At halftime, the Blazers brought out Bill Schonely to interview various personalties from that decade including Bucky Buckwalter, the team's former Vice President of Basketball Operations. Schonely led the interview with this incredible tidbit: Buckwalter was responsible for drafting Terry Porter, Clyde Drexler, Arvydas Sabonis, Cliff Robinson and Jerome Kersey. Wow. Just wow. I can't wait for the team's 65th anniversary season when they trot out Kevin Pritchard and list off his accomplishments -- acquiring Roy, Aldridge, Oden, Bayless, Fernandez and Batum on their respective draft nights -- and ask him for his reflection on the era. "It was a great, great time," I imagine Pritchard saying, "except for that whole World Star Hip Hop Thing."
- In possibly related news, Juwan Howard had six visible pairs of Jordans at his locker tonight. One pair to celebrate each decade of his existence?
- The following sign made it on the jumbotron: "Gregory Wayne Oden: What would your mother think?"
First half defense
It wasn't much defense. We gave up a 37 point quarter. Our starts the last two games have been bad and to give up a 37 point quarter, they basically just dominated that quarter. Points in the paint. They just attacked us. We had no answer for that. Offensively, we missed our shots and I thought that probably affected us on the defensive end of the floor. You start thinking about that and... they were just aggressive tonight.
How frustrated are you?
Hey, it's a loss. It was a bad start. I thought they fought for three quarters. To dig a hole and try to fight out of that... it's tough.
One of the worst starts that you can recall?
You have bad starts but a 37 point quarter. 16 quarter scoring. It's just tough to fight out of that. I thought the next three quarters we fought but we just ran out of gas.
New rotations causing problems?
Nah, I think this was the real deal. We played a very good team tonight. We didn't knock down shots. We had 92 attempts at the basket tonight. We didn't shoot the ball well. Some of those shots that Martel has been shooting didn't fall tonight. Miller, all of our guys early weren't knocking down shots. And defensively they attacked the paint in transition, early, and that was the difference. We came off of our bench, some of our guys on the bench wasn't knocking down shots. We dug ourselves a deep hole.
Getting the shots you wanted?
I thought we got some shots. We did have some open looks that we normally knock down. Execution, setting screens, we didn't get to that until the second half. Setting screens and really freeing each other up and playing together. I thought when we got deep, when we dug ourselves that deep hole, we tried to get it back by ourselves at times. Then the second half, we kind of settled down and played better basketball.
Batum
I thought he was good. He made his shots. He was the one guy that had something going in that first half. Defensively, the second half he was able to do a pretty decent job of controlling Williams and he was the one spark in the first half for us.
Surprised by Batum?
He's playing good. Tonight I was able to increase his minutes, give him more minutes, he was the one guy... I think he was 5 for 5 in the first half [note: he was 7 for 7 at halftime]. His shots, I think he may have been one of the first guys to score off that bench. He really helped us get back into the game. He made a difference tonight.
Team is tired?
Well, you know, the thing is we knew it was going to be tough. We did some good things the last month. But we're coming up against some tough teams and we're not at full strength, but even at full strength these will be tough games. I thought Utah came out and played like they've been playing. They've been playing good basketball.
Do you feel progress slipping away?
No. We've gotten off to a slow start. I thought there was fight in this team. This team fought tonight. But that slow start tonight hurt us bad.
Bayless
No, I haven't talked to Jay about that.
Utah's offensive execution
They were just attacking. We didn't grab. We knew we needed to be physical defensively. They cut freely, they drove past us without us being able to contain the ball, it was just too easy in that first quarter.
First half defense
It looked like we were reacting as opposed to being the aggressor. Getting up and playing these guys. They just put their head down, flew by us and that's just simple. Keep the guy in front of you, keep your body between the man and the basket. And from what I remember or recall we didn't do that at all in the first quarter.
Batum in the fourth
Well, tonight, he was playing well defensively. He had made some shots. And I just stuck with him.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Batum is the future
What stood out to me though – I can’t watch a dramatic 4th quarter without hearing NOW CLAPCLAPCLAP CLAPYAHANDS!!!! There has to be constant noise? Constant promos?
You suck sound effect guy.
It's good to see Batum increasing his trade value
Look, I love Batum and what he brings to the team, but if you want value in return, you gotta give up value. Webster is probably overpaid, Roy is injury prone, and LA is underwhelming.
Now hear me out, it is time for fans to give up their emotional investments in players and realize that they are just commodities. The Blazers need to strike while the iron is getting good and cash in on Batum. A trade of him and Miller could really go a long way in getting a backup banger.
Are you kidding me Tom?
Our backup banger is out till next season. Lets wait and see what happens next season when we have a healthy roster once again. You just dont give a guy like Batum away for a backup to try and salvage a season that will probably be over quicker than we all want to admit. Once Oden and Joel get back those easy lay ups will be hard to come by. Until then lets just see how far the team can go this year as is.
Everything but my Miller hate is a joke
A week ago, folks thought Webster was untouchable and they were uncertain about Batum, and before the season, Webster needed traded and Batum was untouchable. I just like pushing buttons.
I've maintained all along that Webster and Batum must stay.
With those two, our SF rotation is set for the next decade. The only two players that must go are TRAVIS OUTLAW and STEVE BLAKE. I love them as people, but they don’t fit on this team as players.
Rudy Fernandez is right behind them. His position as the “other” SG is a pretty pointless position, and his value is high enough to really net something in return.
by StuckeyDuck on Jan 28, 2010 10:56 PM PST up reply actions
What fun is this sport if we can't make emotional investments in players?
Inquiring minds want to know.
He's just quoting people
who keep saying that about other people they want to trade.
He’s just pulling people’s chain. He got yours, too.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
GOOD NEWS
The good news from tonight was the fighting spirit that would not die and enabled a impressive and fun come back. And, IMO we are watching the maturing of an NBA Elite in Nick Batum. Yes I mean with Kobe. BRoy with lock down defense. Wow!
by blazer_believer on Jan 28, 2010 3:03 AM PST reply actions
You know what tominhawaii....Batum is staying. Count on it. Trade LA before you trade Batum.
Stop posting such idiotic comments.
Why?
It’s the Internet, idiocy is at a premium.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
tom is getting annoying
the miller thing was kinda funny for awhile. now its all jumping the shark
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 6:52 AM PST up reply actions
Now that is funny
You calling me annoying is like Madonna calling Paris Hilton a slut.
If you want a player of value in return, then you got to trade a player of value.
im annoying but for different reasons, at least my annoying has variety
you’re a one-trick pony and your pony died :(
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 7:14 AM PST up reply actions
i didn't beat your one-trick pony to death - you did
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 7:19 AM PST up reply actions
I don't even know what pony you are talking about
Seeing how my new thing is to hate Miller and this discussion was started by me saying Batum has increased his trade value, you argument is as flawed as your ability to capitalize.
My Little Pony
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 7:38 AM PST up reply actions
see im already bored of this string, that's how annoying it is
you’re actually making me tab over to a work-related page and do work. shame on you.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 7:38 AM PST up reply actions
Sorry Tom
Nick is off limits – don’t even imagine it.
by blazer_believer on Jan 28, 2010 3:07 AM PST reply actions
gimme a break
Hopefully, WW doesn’t interpret this as a potential new business model and manages to successfully resist the temptation to send a writer to every Blazers press conference to compliment players on their genitals. Hopefully.
Way to make a mountain out of a molehill. You know Greg appreciated that lighthearted comment on the inside.
Yeah LA has been a little lax
Really bad mojo in the 4th, Batum reminds me of Scottie Pippen. Batum and Roy for the win? Eh. Webster is staying he has a lot of upside. LA on the other hand I believe if we could get a solid player and the deal was right we might trade him. I would consider it if I was in charge. The guy is a no show in the 4th quarter most nights. I did watch some of the game 1 and 2 quarters.
Declined to watch the rest. Unusual cruel punishment didnt permit it. I thought all the Guards for Portland were bad, Miller, Blake and even Bayless, they just didnt have it tonight. However I look at it like this if you took Kobe and all there centers out of the game how good would they look? Not very. We dont have our stars in the game, I think its a miracle were in it as much as we are right now. I give them a break. Some missed calls but they didnt cost us this game. The nice thing is there not giving up. Keep the faith people.
Since Aldridge
was a big factor in the push in the first half of the fourth that got it down to 5, perhaps you should watch the game before calling him a no-show.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
one half of one quarter =/= a good game
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 6:51 AM PST up reply actions
Agreed
It’s just silly to make that kind of a comment on this thread after a game where it wasn’t true, when you didn’t even watch to see if it was.
LaMarcus started poorly, and had flashes of really good play that upped his overall game to mediocre. I wasn’t saying he had a great game or anything. Nic was the only guy who really had a good game, everyone else ranged from “ok” to “pathetic” to “don’t do that on the carpet ever again.”
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
I believe
that LA came alive when Boozer left the game. LaMarcus just couldn’t defend Boozer.
Miller didn't have a good night tonight or on Monday.
Monday he was obviously tired. Also he was grabbing his lower back. Tonight he passed the ball into LA and at one point LA passed it right back out with little time left on the clock…anyway..I like Dave’s assessment…he lost confidence.
I certainly didn’t think his play warranted this:
“Andre Miller sure looked like the same pouty, inefficient, ineffective Miller we saw prior to his blowup with McMillan earlier this season. 7 points on 11 shots, 4 assists, 3 steals, 3 turnovers in just 24 minutes. Miller sat for all but 2 minutes of the fourth quarter which, while warranted, likely didn’t suit him too well.”
Can’t a player have a few not so splendid outings without the “pouty….” assessment???!!!
I actually was thinking that same thing re Miller
he looked horrible. As far a LMA is concerned ….I was specifically watching for how he was being defended …doubles and triple teams all night …still put up 25. You folks may not respect him but the other team sure did
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Jan 28, 2010 8:19 AM PST up reply actions
shot under 50% again, didn't score in crunch time again, got under 10 rebounds again
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 8:26 AM PST up reply actions
got absolutely abused by Boozer all night
such is LMA, putting up numbers and having hardly any impact on the game. I think that’s why his respect level is low.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 8:26 AM PST up reply actions
got to the FT line 7 times (Boozer got the line 9 times in half as many minutes)
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 8:28 AM PST up reply actions
1 assist is pretty good in 43 mins...
didn’t i see someone post something about LMA’s amazing passing skills the other day?
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 8:29 AM PST up reply actions
so yeah
im spent
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 8:29 AM PST up reply actions
I am certainly glad you had fun
you never said anything about the point I made about him commanding double and triple teams …but whatever
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Jan 28, 2010 9:02 AM PST up reply actions
That game was disgusting.
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
Damn it feels good to be a Buckeye!
FKA BLAZER_FAN_199. Now an author for the Jackets Cannon! Check it out!
by Andrew Tolliver on Jan 28, 2010 6:25 AM PST reply actions
No it wasn't. The discusting games were against Memphis and Utah in November. When the
Blazers slept walked through both games. BEFORE most of the injuries…Batum was out. Travis may have been out..don’t recall. Anyway..those games were discusting. This game wasn’t. Depressing maybe..well except MY GOD MY MOOD WAS JUST FINE AFTER SEEING HOW BATUM IS PLAYING…the Blazers were just overmatched..outcoached..they did try though. I hope they learn something from watching Utah’s movement on offense…
rofl Nate doesn't see progress slipping away?
Utah: backdoor cuts, hard screens, movement without the ball, physical defense, layins and dunks
Portland: perimeter passing, one on one, standing around, timid, no interior defense
You can blame some of that on the injuries but not all of it. I was wondering when Nate’s lack of imagination and ingenuity was going to catch up with the team. It appears that time is now.
fwiw Portland still loses that game with Brandon Roy in the lineup
Just awful. A few more of these and the team is out of the playoff race.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
Oh and what a great game by LA, 25 points and 9 rebounds THIS GUY IS REALLY GOOD
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 28, 2010 6:38 AM PST up reply actions
I was at the game and agree. My friend from Chicago said about the Blazers: "Look, they are just STANDING AROUND
if they MOVED it wouldn’t be so easy to guard them!! That one or 2 guys go to the corners and just STAND there….look how Utah moves around…." this was the 2nd time seeing the Blazers.
Oh and I still don't get all the fury over the WW question
must be a media thing
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
I thought this write-up was a little harsh
I like it when the Blazers win. But I actually had MORE fun watching them play on Monday night and last night than I have many games where they squeaked out some kind of strange win.
These were guys that were clearly overmatched by another team. That was just starkly obvious. But what made the game fun for me to watch—and so non-typical NBA!—was that this team fought. They fought tooth and nail with everything they had. And they actually threatened to take this away from the Jazz a couple of times. But for some missed shots by Blake and Rudy, it could’ve been an amazing, amazing game.
And that’s what I want: I want a team that plays with every ounce of passion that they have even against ridiculous odds. which was clearly the case last night.
I think that’s why people tend to love Blake so much. Is there any doubt he gives everything he has? It reminds of that basketball movie Blue Chip with Shaq when the coach (Nick Nolte?) claims that his best coaching job was when a given team went for .500 in a season. Because [paraphrase] “That team played to the absolute maximum of their capabilities.”
I love that. I love seeing that. And I’ll take those losses if I feel like the team is fighting. And I think the Rose Garden will too.That is a completely different loss than the kind we were having a few years ago.
So ease up on the recap a little bit. That effort that the team had last night deserves some compliments. Or at least a mention.
Buck Williams for the hall of fame
by Phizbin on Jan 28, 2010 7:26 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
If we'd fought even a little bit in the first
I would agree. We didn’t, except for Nic. That’s it.
There was zero defensive intensity. They didn’t beat us by making an incredible percentage of shots. They beat us by making an average percentage of dunks and layins.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!
to Phizbin: yes I like the effort. I think the recap was harsh as well. Which I mentioned already.
I do think Utah moved around more on offense per leeroyjenkins. I think this team is really talented and could do this as well as anyone, given instruction. Maybe it has to do with the amt of playing time TOGETHER as members are on the court at a certain time. I don’t know. Or maybe it’s what they’ve been taught. Again…do not know. They did give a great effort and I feel they need to be given the tools to win. Not be ’CLEARLY OVERMATCHED. possibly outcoached…possibly.
I'm going to pretend I didn't pay money to see this game live....
Poor defense by Portland in the 1st quarter. It was the longest quarter ever!!!! And it was basically the same set up every time. Deron Williams drives into the lane and hands it off to someone for the dunk and/or lay-up. The one bright spot was Nic Batum. He looks like he could be a great player someday. KP please get this team a center/PF. Someone, anyone, who can play defense and rebound.
Boo-a-rama
I have to say that was the most impressive booings (asides from when the jerkface L@kers are in town) I have ever been witness to. Five full minutes of people standing in their seats and drowning out the jumbo-tron. Old ladies, small children, women and men; I swear they turned up the volume of the video at least twice, to no avail.
It’s sad when that was the most memorable part of the whole game…..
WW
Good grief, give the WW writer a break, Ben. Here’s what she said:
I felt so bad for the guy surrounded by reporters like he was, I think I accidentally made him feel worse with my question. I personally just don’t care that much the poor guy was caught with his pants down in a photo that Oden says is about 18 months old and was supposed to be private.
So I apologize, and I’m deeply embarrassed to say I actually asked Oden the following question while television cameras were rolling: "Why are you embarrassed? A lot of people are impressed."
Batum correction
Also, Batum slowed down to wait for Korver and try to draw a three point play. Korver didn’t time it as well as Batum did.
Thought you’d notice that.
no he didnt slow down to get contact
he slowed down to gather the dribble so he can finish the dunk off because he was going to fast
Odenized
i was at the game last night and after the 1st quarter...
the booing started and it made it difficult to understand what was going on. I was wondering if anyone knew why Jerryd Bayless got a Tech.
I am pretty sure that he gave the Refs an acurate review of their performance
ie ….that they sucked ….they didn’t appreciate his candor
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Jan 28, 2010 9:05 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Jerryd said something about the LACK OF A FOUL CALL on Batum. There was a very obvious foul
to Batum…an arm into Batum’s body..another arm toward the ball..which wasn’t a foul but the body slam was. It was RIGHT in front of the ref. It was a horrible non-call. HORRIBLE. And Jerryd said something.
There were a few non-calls against the Blazers that were being called on the Blazers on the other end...
That Batum dunk was one and so was the foul on Jeff Pendergraff. Utah was getting away with being overly physical and Portland wasn’t. That is one quarter of basketball I hope to never see from the Blazers again. Wish I could have heard what Bayless said to the refs. Also, LMA needs to learn how to pass out of the double and triple team to the open man and the other players need to move to the hoop when the other team is doing that.
Clownzano is kicking himself over being scooped...
Karma reared its head this afternoon as the Willamette Week’s website crashed, temporarily preventing people from reading the writer’s take on last night’s press conference. Unfortunately, it is believed that the site crash was caused by too much traffic generated by that story. Hopefully, WW doesn’t interpret this as a potential new business model and manages to successfully resist the temptation to send a writer to every Blazers press conference to compliment players on their genitals. Hopefully.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
WW statement
It was a light hearted remark to a ridiculous situation. I still don’t understand why nudity and sex is so taboo in this country. The reporter was complimenting him on his penis, big deal.
I can't decide between the groan and Blake going Teen Wolf as the funniest moment
I laughed when Aldridge passed without even trying to make a move and the entire Rose Garden let out a collective groan. I’ve heard crowds boo before, but that was just frustration being released after he passed one too many times. After that he started attacking more and things picked up.
You alluded to Blake getting booed, but didn’t mention why. He went broken arrow and took 3 or 4 shots in a row without passing or looking for other guys. Normally when people get mad at Blake it’s for not shooting when he’s open or for the holes in his game like lack of D or taking guys off the dribble, but this was the first time I can remember him turning into Teen Wolf. This would be like one of those guys who stand behind Snoop Dogg grabbing his mike and freestyling. Blake is usually good because he knows what he can and can’t do and sticks to his role. I have two theories, a: he either felt pressure with Rudy and Batum back since if all he’s going to do is hit 3s they might as well be in or b: he was temporarily possessed by some sort of selfish demon.
"Maybe we can't stroll to the music of the lute. We must march to the sound of drums." -Captain Kirk
I suspect
that Blake was told by Nate, “No one else is making anything, see if you can make a shot.” He couldn’t.
It was too much out of character for Steve to just do that on his own.
But it was kind of funny seeing him do that.
#7 #10 #25 #52 -- #5 & #88 are back!

by 





























