Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Game 44 Recap: Blazers 95, Celtics 98 (OT)

Oh man, I wanted this game badly.  It's a shame Portland couldn't come out on the winning end but this was one of the more amazing outings we've seen in a couple years...years that have been filled with amazing events.

Long Story Short

Shrugging off the loss of Jerryd Bayless after the half the Blazers hustle, space, and above all rebound their way to overtime against the far deeper Celtics in a game where only the final minute out of 53 total went awry.

The Game

The Blazers were in this game from the beginning.  The Celtics were too, for about a quarter.  Portland shot well at the game's outset but their points were coming off of jumpers, particularly from LaMarcus Aldridge who was canning it from places besides the usual extended block.  Boston, behind Kevin Garnett's energy, was getting the ball inside and rebounding well.  The Celtics had a 20-8 points in the paint advantage after one period.  Even if the Blazers shot a high percentage it wasn't hard to tell how this was going to turn out.  Outside shots falter, inside shots stay steady.  The only thing that kept Boston from running away with the game completely were their turnovers, most of the silly variety.  30-25 Boston after one.

When the second units for each team came in the story changed.  Portland, short-handed, never played a complete second unit.  They kept scorers in the game to produce points and let the reserves throw their bodies around.  Boston's bench players, meanwhile, looked disinterested.  The Blazers destroyed the Celtics by hustling and offensive rebounding...a theme that would carry through the entire game.  Boston's bench never really responded.  The only thing that kept the Celtics above water was Rasheed Wallace scoring over LaMarcus Aldridge in the post and over the entire squad from three.  Had Sheed, who wasn't moving all that energetically himself, been off the Blazers would have made up ground easily behind their inspired play.  Instead the quarter ended up even and Boston took that same 5-point lead into the half.

A couple of significant developments shaped the second half.  First, Jerryd Bayless went down after the first minute of the third quarter with an ankle sprain.  He wouldn't return.  On a team already missing Roy (and everyone else we've lacked all year) it looked like the stroke of doom.  But when Bayless went down Andre Miller, Martell Webster, and LaMarcus Aldridge didn't see adversity.  They saw more shots.  The Celtics remained fairly indifferent no matter which Blazers were on the floor.  Kevin Garnett was the only guy with energy but he picked up fouls and had to sit.  In his absence the Celtics refused to take advantage of any matchups consistently, playing a laissez-faire style of offense. The Blazers matched Boston's production in the period again, entering the fourth down by that same, pesky 5 points.

If you thought Portland's scorers got aggressive in the third, you should have seen the fourth.  Andre Miller made like a slower, more squat version of Kobe Bryant, twisting his way to the hoop on multiple occasions.  Martell Webster went crazy from outside.  For a while there it looked like the Celtics, still looking passive, would get dragged under.  But foul trouble only keeps you out so long and when Kevin Garnett came back Boston's energy returned with him.  The Blazers and Celtics exchanged leads through the middle of the quarter until Paul Pierce and Rajon Rondo lit Portland up for 9 points in 2 minutes.  Comfortably up 8 with 4:43 left the Celtics had it in the bag.  Except the Blazers took their Swiss Army Knives, cut a hole in the bag, slipped out the bottom, and began corkscrewing the Celtics right in the head.  Miller and Webster each scored 5 points in the final 4 minutes.  All Boston could manage was a Rondo layup.  The score was tied and Boston had the ball for the final possession which turned into an unstoppable Paul Pierce drive.  Except Andre Miller stopped it by jumping outside the no-charge circle and taking a charge with 1.1 left.  After a couple of timeouts to get the inbounds play set the Blazers lobbed it in to a cutting LaMarcus Aldridge but his short floater off of the lob was blocked by Kendrick Perkins.  Portland had pushed Boston into overtime.  Several Celtics were in foul trouble.  The Blazers only had 8 men dressed.  Would fatigue or whistles tell the tale strongest?

The Blazers left it all on the floor in overtime.  The only points scored in the first 2:30 of the 5-minute session came off of a 20-footer by Rondo off of an offensive rebound.  Otherwise Portland kept the Celtics away from the bucket and cleaned up the glass.  The Blazers scored the next two buckets:  an offensive rebound tip by Juwan Howard and a Miller layup.  Portland took a 2-point lead into the final minute of the game.  Unfortunately Juwan Howard couldn't finish a fantastic offensive rebound at the 1-minute mark, losing it off of a bad pass to Kendrick Perkins.  This led to just about the only shot Ray Allen connected with all night...a three.  Boston led by 1.  Then the Blazers missed a shot with 19 seconds left to put them up, the rebound was tipped out, Aldridge gave chase but flung it in from near out-of-bounds at the halfcourt line...to Ray Allen.  At that point they had a ready-made fast-break and dunked it to go up 3.  The Blazers got a semi-poor look from beyond the arc for Rudy Fernandez but tipped out a desperation rebound off of the miss.  Fernandez recovered with 3 seconds left but his internal clock must have said .3 seconds because he flung it wildly.  It missed wildly.  The Celtics rebounded, the horn sounded, and the crowd celebrated wildly.  Portland made a great accounting of themselves but came up short, 95-98 in overtime.

The Blazers ran a semi-understandable 56-32 deficit in the paint tonight.  With that kind of gap this should have been a blowout.  Portland kept it from being so by spacing the floor as well as we've seen all year, passing the ball appropriately, and hitting whenever they could.  The shooting percentage says 38.2%, which looks awful, but when you look at the kind of shots the Blazers had to take tonight it wasn't a disaster.  Portland generated enough offense to beat the Celtics on a night when Boston shot 10% higher than did the Blazers.  That's no small feat.  A bunch of that offense came off of second-chance points.  The Blazers won that battle 22-8, nabbing 16 offensive rebounds to Boston's 6.  The Blazers won the overall rebounding battle 46-37 on a night when they missed far more shots than the Celtics (which should lead to the Celts getting more boards).  That was amazing.  Portland also drew more foul shots than Boston, 27-18.  It was all about hustle and nerve and the Blazers had both.  In the end Boston just had too much talent and too many bodies.  One shot-blocker on Portland's side to make the Celtics think twice in the paint probably would have made the difference.  One less turnover might have done it.  One more shot made could have too.  It was that close.

Individual Observations

Andre Miller led the team with 28 tonight, plus 8 rebounds and 8 assists.  He really looked like he knew what he was doing out there.  He really relished this game, his best as a Blazer.  It's hard to imagine him playing any better.

LaMarcus Aldridge did his job with 10 boards.  He mixed up the offense early to good effect but became more predictable as the game wore on.  He ended up 7-18 with 19 points.  He had a hard time guarding either Wallace or Garnett.

Martell Webster shot 5-16 for the game, 2-7 from the arc but he drew 9 foul shots (hitting 7) and turned it on in the fourth when he needed to.  I think I even saw a strut out there after he hit a bucket.  He certainly had a look like, "You know you should give me that ball!"  19 points and 4 rebounds.  He didn't start the overtime period, which was a puzzler to me considering how he was rolling late in the fourth.  I'd be interested in the rationale for that.

Jerryd Bayless played a good 21 minutes with 12 points and 4 assists.  He attacked the hoop first and took the jumper second, which was good.  Boston wasn't that interested in stopping him either.  His ankle sprain was unfortunate.  It's hard to imagine him doing much that Miller didn't cover though.

Juwan Howard was a MAN out there again, grabbing 12 boards, throwing every dirty trick in the book to get some offensive rebounds, and hitting 3 shots for 6 points.  It's so cool watching him make veteran guile count more than size or athleticism.

Portland's bench came in two flavors tonight.  The defense/energy guys--Pendergraph and Cunningham--did great.  They took only 1 shot between them but they filled minutes with hustle so the scorers could rest.  The scoring guys--Blake and Fernandez--had rough outings.  Blake's 2-7 and Rudy's 2-11 were the only real downers to the evening.  Both looked like they were rushing their shots and Rudy looks like he just doesn't like shooting it anymore.  He passes up shots that he would have drained without a thought last year.  Rudy did provide 5 rebounds.  Both Rudy and Steve provided timely threes to keep Portland's hopes alive.  It wasn't all bad...they just didn't play over their heads like everyone else and they both shot poorly in a game where we needed a tad bit more.

Final Thoughts

This game was one of the more uplifting, exciting games I've seen in a long time.  I'm incredibly happy to have watched it.  I do wonder if the effort plus the short roster plus overtime will end up costing us tomorrow in Detroit.  Let us hope not.  If Portland can pull out another effort like this one they'll be in for a pleasant end to the trip.

Boxscore

See what the Celtics fans think of the Blazers at CelticsBlog.

Check out your Jersey Contest score here and enter tomorrow's game here.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Other than the final score

I too had a blast. Could not have been prouder of them. Bayless had that look in his eye..Andre was awesome. I also really enjoyed watching Cunningham playing D off the ball. That guy has some GREAT defensive instincts.

  RoadBlazer

by Roadblazer on Jan 22, 2010 10:02 PM PST reply actions  

it was fun

Watched it by myself. My neighbors must of thought I had about 12 guys in here the way I was yelling in joy and frustration at various points, something I don’t usually do. The fact that we were anywhere near in the game with these guys is amazing.

Just imagine if sheed got tee’d up like he should have when he grabbed that official…

But even then, the effort was fantastic, the energy radiated through the TV and the drama was high. there were any number of ways we could have won, there were any number of ways we could have lost it was just exciting to watch…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jan 23, 2010 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

LA needs to start showing up when it counts,

He could have been the difference tonight. But he was a no show in the 4th quarter. I love LA, but he needs to step up in the clutch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COMCAST SUCKS!!
"Let's win the playoffs!!!!!"- Rudy Fernandez

by shamman on Jan 22, 2010 10:05 PM PST reply actions  

And Dre

17 second chance points in the first half I believe. For all this talk about Boston being hungry, they sure as heck didn’t look it. We were the more aggressive hungrier team basically the entire game.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah

I think that is the problem with him and Roy as a tandem in Aldridge’s developmental years. Roy is so clutch in the 4th that Aldridge never had to perform at as high a level at that stage of the game. He never needed to and never has learned how to finish from his position because Roy was and is the closer.

this is actually probably the root of the Lamarcus is soft mantra that is out there. I don’t think he is soft so much, I mean some of these last few games have shown he can play tough, he just has developed a habit of relying on Roy in the clutch, a habit he needs to break. People remember clutch play more and Aldridge needs to develop that ability.

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jan 23, 2010 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

+1

Whatever the reason is that the mantra is out there, it is out there….I’m happy with him putting up double doubles but he is going to fade even further in the fourth- when it counts- as other guys step up who ARE finishers (Miller….)

by ClydeTheGlyde on Jan 23, 2010 9:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Fantastic game, all things considered!

Also great to see Andre, who I watched lead the 76ers the past couple years, getting into a serious groove as the season wears on…

by dulcamara on Jan 22, 2010 10:06 PM PST reply actions  

Ouch

Excellent effort though. Decent player rotation although I agree with your observation about Webster not starting the overtime period.

This game is an example of where the over reliance on Roy isolation plays with four players standing around not touching the ball comes back to haunt the team. The young guys are now having to learn to make the plays themselves and find out what works for them. With the exception of Miller and Howard, there was a lot of hesitation that cost the team some good looks at shots. That said, there were many positives. There was good ball movement and everyone got involved. Hopefully this will pay dividends as the season goes on.

It would have been great if they had been rewarded with the victory for their effort.

by rockman on Jan 22, 2010 10:17 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, I hope the Blazers know the fans appreciate EFFORT as well as wins. And I do think

the players are getting invaluable experience being in there without Roy to make all of the plays down the stretch. Good for them to know that they TOO can make them. I think LA will eventually just play ball instead of thinking too much at the end of close games. I do wish Rudy would have realized he had more time at the end of the game. I bet he is really kicking himself. I know he is a huge competitor. He was probably exhausted…he played 35 minutes…after playing what…15 minutes at most since his return?

by Natsthecat on Jan 22, 2010 10:26 PM PST up reply actions  

My guess is that Webster did not start the OT was due to having 5 fouls

Nate did a great job ensuring he’d have a rollover foul for the Detroit game.

#52

by jksnake99 on Jan 22, 2010 10:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the problem was that both Martell and Rudy had 5 fouls for several minutes at the end

It was bitter that Bayless was out and couldn’t defend Rondo, but having Blake in there and saving at least one of Martell or Rudy from fouling out was not a bad decision.

by Norsktroll on Jan 22, 2010 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I think in overtime

you go for the jugular with everything you’ve got. The team that comes out the strongest usually wins the extra period.

—Dave

by Dave on Jan 22, 2010 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I totally agree

We know how Nate is with foul trouble though.

#52

by jksnake99 on Jan 22, 2010 10:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I loved that he went back in

Right after Nate realized that nothing short of taking out a mallet and whacking someone on the head was going to get a foul called in OT.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:15 PM PST up reply actions  

yup--first team to score in OT usually takes it.

Marty shoulda been there to start the OT. He was the one that gave us the opportunity.

by RenoBlazerFan on Jan 23, 2010 7:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I have been a Blazer fan for a long time

And I have come to realize I can handle winning/losing whatever as long as we play hard. If we come out and play like this every night, I’ll almost never be upset with the team.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Rudy has got to shake the rust off

He needs to get back to just shooting. He is not even sure of where he is at on the floor right now. He spent more time checking where his feet were before every shoot than focusing on the rim. He’ll get it back, I just wish he had it back last night…

"Oh Yeah!" ~ Kool Aid Man

by PDXBuckeye on Jan 23, 2010 10:28 AM PST up reply actions  

any game the blazers win of late is an upset

and so when those wins come they may be more fun than when the team’s really good.

ignacio

by ignacio on Jan 22, 2010 10:18 PM PST reply actions  

wow, sounds like I missed another great game.

What a team. Now Bayless has a sprain !?
We need to get that new platelet therapy in the locker room immediately !
The Celtics are so BORING… they bore themselves.
The Blazers have such a great competitive attitude now, I hope we can keep that going.
Very proud of the team.

"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener

by Berkeley on Jan 22, 2010 10:43 PM PST reply actions  

As much as I love Rudy, it was hard to watch him tonight.

I thought you took it easy on him, Dave. One of my favorite skills that Rudy has is that he is a gamer, a guy that raises his level of play when the team needs it. He did the opposite tonight. You nailed it when you said he was passing up shots that he would normally take, and likely hit. Rudy is not back yet, in fact, I don’t think he is even close. His confidence is gone, and it sucks to watch. We need him more than ever, I hope he rises to the occasion. I think he will….

RUDY > MJ
But, of course, if I could make a dunk on his face I would. - Rudy

by Rudiculous on Jan 22, 2010 10:58 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, really struggling

It will come around.

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 23, 2010 3:16 AM PST up reply actions  

The last half of the fourth and the OT

Was like a drill in bad fundamentals by both teams, bad shot selection, botching layups, etc.

That being said, that was a lot of fun.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:12 PM PST reply actions  

I disagree with Dave - I think if Bayless does not get hurt we win tonight.

The players got tired, lost focus – we needed Bayless’ energy.

But a fun game nontheless.

by The Thinker on Jan 22, 2010 11:17 PM PST reply actions  

We may

Who knows if Boston misses all those shots. If it goes the same way, yes we do because someone besides Dre can take it late.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 22, 2010 11:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

And his defense. I’m still looking for quarter by quarter stats, but my impression was that Rondo was more effective in the half court in the second half.

by Epimenides on Jan 23, 2010 12:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes to needing Bayless’ energy, that is. Close games could call for an application of chaos theory, where any slight disturbance can lead to any unpredictable outcome.

by Epimenides on Jan 23, 2010 12:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Nice summary of a great game Dave.

You don't need a Maserati to mow the lawn.

by pxilpooshr on Jan 22, 2010 11:18 PM PST reply actions  

That was a fun game indeed except...

my stupid DVR stopped recording with the game tied at the end of regulation. I had worked very hard to avoid the final score and then ended up having to look on line anyway.

Even with the loss, this was one of the most enjoyable games this year just for the overall work ethic.

I loved Andre tonight.

Like what you like, enjoy what you enjoy,
don't be afraid to make slurping sounds,
and don't take crap from anybody

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae-5q8MaSSU

by DaNoose on Jan 22, 2010 11:24 PM PST reply actions  

I hope all those who've been saying "Dre doesn't fit"

got a chance to watch this game… Man, this guy is a gamer… You are right Dave, this was a great game to watch. Playoff type basketball, with the refs letting the boys play. I, too, was very proud of the effort. (But bummed at the end result).

Juwan was also key tonight. Martell was like both teams – very streaky. I knew Nate would take him out with 5 fouls… I wish Nate made himself a New Year’s resolution: to let guys foul out!

Hope the Blazers get a restful flight to Detroit… This is going to be one tough back-to-back after leaving it all on the floor like they did, through OT, tonight…

by Visionary2 on Jan 22, 2010 11:27 PM PST reply actions  

Agree on Dre

And he doesn’t just fit, he supplies a key ingredient – a second leader behind Roy. I like LMA, but he isn’t it. Something to consider when making personnel decisions if the team hopes to contend in the near future.

by Epimenides on Jan 23, 2010 12:16 AM PST up reply actions  

There were few posters, including myself, that wanted Dre from beginning.

Don’t remember which ones, but some of them also followed the Sixers and knew what he could do, while others sorely realized the fact that we needed another perimeter player that can score as well as set up other guys. (especially after Houston series)

With Roy and Dre working well together (before Roy went down, anyway), I think our backcourt combo is the best in the NBA. I seriously can’t think of any other backcourt combo that I would think is superior to the one we have. Parker-Ginobili might get the top billing, (perhaps Nash-Richardson) but I’d rather have Dre-Roy.

Just be thankful that we dodged both Turkglu and Millsap and landed Dre instead. It’s better to be lucky than good sometimes.

"I think he’s been doing some good things. I think he’s been doing some good things. He’s had to play a lot of minutes lately with Blake being out. I think he’s been doing some good things." -Nate McMillan

by xedubx on Jan 23, 2010 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Dre's fit

1. I think Dre fits, but he’s not a perfect fit.
2. I’ve expected all along they would get it sorted out.
3. This kind of game proves nothing about his fit. OK, so he fits with the one third of our rotation that is still standing.

This was a great game by Andre (well, he wasn’t great in the first, he forced some shots, but after that it was excellent). But it says nothing about how well he fits with the team we thought we had for this year.

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 23, 2010 3:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Jeff Pendergraph's new nickname?

Nearly forgotten in the excitement of the game was that Mike Barrett in tonight’s broadcast gave Jeff Pendergraph a new nickname: The Snake.

Not only because he apparently owns snakes, but: “… because he’s kind of like Snake Plissken.”

Did we all hear that correctly? Was it old and just new to me? It flew by pretty quickly, but not too fast for Rice to make some comments about Escape From New York. Maybe I’m slow to the party, but I feel like this needs to be repeated to the internets, if only to see -

1. If this will have any fan traction at all.
2. How fast someone can do the inevitable photoshop job.
3. The time it takes someone to say this should be a fanshot and create a poll full of options based on Kurt Russell films.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Jan 22, 2010 11:50 PM PST reply actions  

I assume its based off former ASU QB Jake "The Snake" Plummer

Maybe its what Rice calls all ASU guys?

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 23, 2010 1:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Wouldn’t put it past Wild Rice. Interesting angle. But it was Barrett who first mentioned it, and had the direct reference to Plissken.

The Mikes don’t seem to coin a lot of new nicknames, but it seemed like a funny and uncharacteristic pop culture tangent from the mind of MB. Who knew?

by HowlinJoeWolf on Jan 23, 2010 1:38 AM PST up reply actions  

We need mills

Dudes faster than a kenyan and we have 3 guards right now, two of them streaky, and one coming off a long injury period.

"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez

by TheGreatMon on Jan 23, 2010 12:14 AM PST reply actions  

Perhaps

They just run 10K at a pace faster than you or I can sprint.

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 23, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Great game...

I cannot wait for the Celts to play in the Rose Garden. The Blazers may have come up short but they did not back down from the contact and remained aggressive and forced the refs to call way more contact than I have seen them call on Boston (against the Blazers anyway) since KG joined the team. I was very encouraged by what I saw from Miller, Aldridge, Webster, Rudy, and Bayless. They may have lost but it was not because they were in awe of the Celtics or because they were working too hard to show they belong. They just didn’t quite have enough and Boston made enough plays to win.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Jan 23, 2010 1:18 AM PST reply actions  

My Flickr photo set from the game

I have already deleted many photos, and could probably shorten it much more for just a best of but then it would take away from the “flow” of the game. I haven’t annotated/captioned everything so far. I have also made a few short videos that I’ll probably upload later (shootaround, introduction, timeout, final chances), but unfortunately I’m traveling today and don’t have much time left right now.

by Norsktroll on Jan 23, 2010 6:39 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Nick Picking, but what the Hell

1) Aldridge at end of game situations is still a work in progress. You can’t expect the guy to suddenly turn into a back to the basket marvel. Get him in motion from the top of the key- like Dirk Nowitski. Poor play calling from the bench.

2) Stop passing the ball to somebody with 3 seconds left on the shot clock. Man up and get the ball to the rim.

3) Steve Blake needs to go. His limited arsenal comes to full view in a game like this. Here is a trade you can make straight up: Blake for Kwame Brown. Both make $4 million, have the same per, and are on the last year of their contract. Doubt Detroit would do it without a sweetener.

by ralphzillo on Jan 23, 2010 9:47 AM PST reply actions  

A limited arsenal

only hurts when all your other weapons are out.

Kwame Brown would have helped us in this game? Really? We out-rebounded them, you know. So you think he has weapons that would have helped us? Kwame Brown?

What sweeteners would you be willing to give up? Dante? Jeff? A first round pick?

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 23, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

This wasn’t really an amazing game lol… The Celtics were practically giving it away and still managed to win. It was amazing, however, in the fact that the Blazers were short men and still played good but if the Celtics were playing 100% it would have been an easy win for them.

by ChrisG503 on Jan 23, 2010 6:19 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm