Game 42 Recap: Blazers 92, Wizards 97
Ugh. Watching that game was like removing teeth with an ice pick: slow, painful, and fraught with mistakes. You have to admire Washington's guts for sticking in there. Credit to them. But that game was begging to be taken from the opening tip to the final horn but the Blazers never got out of second gear and failed to grab the win.
The game opened with a theme that would typify the entire contest. Portland stayed unselfish on offense, moving the ball and getting shots for everyone. But the Blazers also were unselfish on defense, meaning they let the Wizards have good shots, including and especially drives to the hoop. Washington didn't always take advantage, but whenever they did the opening was there and they scored, got fouled, or both. Meanwhile the unselfishness on Portland's end was barely paying off, as Webster and Aldridge were the only two guys hitting consistently. And even they were feasting on jumpers. As was true on the other end, every time Portland attacked the rim good things happened. But the attacks didn't come often enough. 24-21 Washington after one.
Both teams settled into a malaise in the second period. Portland's offense went from cold to frigid as the jumpers continued. They added in turnovers to spice things up. Washington seemed content to play along. At certain points it looked like everyone was walking through practice plays instead of trying to win an NBA game. The entire quarter probably should have been put in a time capsule, sent to the moon, and then the moon nuked into smithereens. 19-17 Washington, Blazers now down 5.
After halftime and the obligatory Miller Lite "I love my beer more than the hottest girl I've ever dated" commercials both teams came out energized...on offense anyway. Jerryd Bayless started the quarter on a good note with penetration and some nice passes for scores. LaMarcus Aldridge picked up as the period progressed with some buckets, some offensive rebounds, and a couple nice passes of his own. Then Andre Miller went crazy. He was the one guy who figured out that Washington wasn't going to be able to guard anybody who charged the basket. He got layups, floaters, and stop-and-pops. It was probably his best offensive showing as a Blazer. When the rubble cleared Portland had scored 35 in the period, more than doubling the previous quarter's offensive output. Unfortunately Antawn Jamison began using the Blazers as defensive test-dummies, scoring again and again and again right at the cup. The Wizards, too, had come to the realization that closer was better and that the opponent wasn't going to stop them on a consistent basis. Throw in a little Caron Butler lightning and the Wizards amassed 27 in the period themselves. Portland exited the period in the lead, but only by 3.
The Blazers couldn't capitalize on momentum heading into the fourth. Apparently figuring one quarter of penetration was enough, Portland reverted to their jumper-happy ways. Meanwhile the Wizards smelled a potential win. Portland's shot progression looked like "15-footer, 20-footer, 26-footer, 18-footer..." (hit and miss). Washington's was "Layup...free throws...free throws...three-pointer...layup" (all makes). The Blazers quickly found themselves trailing again. They never let the Wizards get too far ahead. But when a team starving for wins smells one they tend to gain confidence and things that have gone wrong for them heretofore start going right. In a nip and tuck game the Wizards executed in the last two minutes and the Blazers made enough small mistakes to cost them a chance at victory: not getting back in transition on one play, giving up an offensive rebound on another, missing a free throw, not knowing an inbounds play. In isolation none of these were a big deal. Thrown together with the opportunities Washington got as a result they were enough to tip the close game to the Wizards' favor. Portland loses by 5, 97-92 in a classic example of playing down to the level of your opponent.
Portland lost this game by giving up 51.5% shooting to a team with only two guys who can score. Portland lost this game by going 3-17 on threes. Portland lost this game by earning only 16 foul shots on an afternoon when the refs were awarding them for any aggressive move (Washington had 28). Portland lost this game by giving up a 46-30 deficit in points in the paint. The Blazers rebounded better, kept the turnovers even, and matched the scoring of Washington's main guys with their own. They just couldn't defend and didn't attack hard enough on offense and that was it.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge was having defensive trouble all day whether straight up or caught in an difficult switch mismatch. But he had 22 points and 15 rebounds, really manning up on the boards.
Andre Miller's 10-16 performance, much of it coming in the second half, was brilliant...not so much because of his individual prowess but because he showed the veteran knack of knowing how to score against a particular opponent. He matched Aldridge's 22. He had only 2 assists but the Blazers may have been overpassing a bit early anyway. In this game I didn't mind ‘Dre becoming the de factor shooting guard.
Martell Webster scored 18. He took the shots he had to. It wouldn't have done him any good to pass up the open looks he had. But he ended up 2-7 from distance, couldn't create much off the dribble, and snagged only 3 rebounds. It wasn't his worst game but it wasn't his best either.
Jerryd Bayless didn't have the shot going but he did a smart thing by penetrating and then dishing. His 3-9, 9-point outing was balanced by his 8 assists as he played point to Andre's off-guard. Had the shot been falling this would have been one Jerryd's memorable nights.
Juwan Howard did a good job banging down low on defense. He's guarding guys he has no business being matched up against and is acquitting himself well. He only managed 7 points and 6 rebounds of his own in 32 minutes. The help rotation wasn't crisp today either.
Steve Blake had a decent all-around game with 10 points, 4 assists, 3 rebounds, 2 steals, and 3 turnovers in 22 minutes. The turnovers were mostly stepping on the sideline after being flung a tough pass in the coffin corner. He had energy, at least.
Rudy Fernandez is really struggling with his offense, going 1-7, 0-4 from three in 13 minutes. He had 3 rebounds. He's trying out there. It just looks like the ball and he are speaking different languages.
Jeff Pendergraph didn't make as big of an impact as usual in this game. He was throwing himself around but Washington just worked around him. 2 points, 3 rebounds, in 16 minutes.
Dante Cunningham had a missed shot and a personal foul in 5 minutes.
Final Thoughts and Links
It doesn't get any easier (or prettier) with Philadelphia coming up on Wednesday. At least there's a day of rest in between. But if the Blazers play this same kind of game in Philly they're going to get killed. This felt like a wake-up call for a team that had gotten used to winning games they weren't supposed to. Let's hope the Blazers get the message. Because of the lineup this team is, and will remain, about an inch away from falling off the cliff. They'll win zero games by just showing up. They have to walk the fine line in every outing.
See Wizards fans react at BulletsForever
Check out your Jersey Contest score here and enter Wednesday's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First to say
losing is never good, but the emergence of Martell Webster as a consistent scorer/willing wing defender is (aside from the great stretch GO had before getting hurt) the highlight of the season for me.
Always supporting Greg Oden.
Free AK1984.
same....been waiting for Webster for while...
but I don’t think we’ve seen anything close to his ceiling…
He doesn’t have real good handles necessary to score off the dribble in traffic (but then, not many do), but he is a capable passer and ran a nice pick and roll with Howard, today. Haven’t seen that out of Webster before, and I’d like to see more.
Ultimately, he looks very capable of outplaying most SF’s in the league on a regular basis, and has the physical tools to match up against some of the biggest Blazer headaches (Melo/James, etc.)
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 18, 2010 3:48 PM PST up reply actions
Should be MIP this year
His emergence is finally showing us why he was such a high pick.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
he could be MIP just for his defense/rebounding alone
even though today was a bit of an off day, rebounding.
Plus, he should be front-runner for the 3-point contest, given he ranks 6th in 3 pointers made, and his rate is improving, too.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 18, 2010 3:59 PM PST up reply actions
LMA was eating all the rebounds today
I mean 15, dang.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
This is what I like to see
Positives being taken from an otherwise dreadfully hard to watch game. The bad sides were obvious, but so goes the destiny of injured/affected teams.
can you say
“bye bye Travis”?
This is one of those games where someone will probably say “if we only had Outlaw we could’ve pulled it out down the stretch” but if you’re thinking that way, you’ve gotta insert TO into the lineup during games the Blazers won earlier…where team defense, scappiness and rebounding from the forward position carried the day
Once Batum returns Portland will have enough athletic forwards, but they’ll still need better interior defense. Whether that’s a 7-footer or a 6’9" guy isn’t that important, as long as he’s a legitimate shot blocker with a nasty streak
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
But they are inconsisent
As are most of the teams below us. OKC loses that game if Atlanta can hit ANY shots in the fourth.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
They win a lot of nice road games
but they lose a lot at home, too. If they learn to defend their home court against decent teams, they’ll do very well in the second half of the season.
I still suspect they are a year away from the playoffs, but they are certainly in the mix.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
thanks for the recap, i only got to listen to parts on the radio
listening on the radio is hard
seems like your average trailblazers loss
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
im starting to have doubts about the Oden vs Durant
Durant had one of his worst games today and scored 29 pts…. and his team won. if we had him today we would have won
Odenized
no more Oden v Durant comments ever!!
When are people going to quit with this. Nearly every GM in the league would have made the same pick KP did, “at that time”. What is the point of playing “what if”??
Ugh is about the only thing u can say
Oh well. Can’t win them all.
"What I´m sure about is that I never had a gun. For gunfights I have the Playstation."
~Rudy Fernandez
by twiggs on Jan 18, 2010 2:21 PM PST via mobile reply actions
We could if Nate wasn't the coach!
He easily costs the team 30 – 40 wins a season.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Last year especially
We should have won 89 last year.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
So what you're saying is...
that when I get home, I should immediately erased this game that I tivo’d??
Yes.
But first watch Miller’s lob to Bayless for the dunk. That kid has wings!
by ShannyMcShanShan on Jan 18, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions
I just did on NBA.com
now I can delete the game…. i’m not superstitious are anything, but for some reason, I think that Blazers play better in their red away jerseys than their black away jerseys. Just putting that out there!!
I think they're cooler looking in any case
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
last year it was the opposite
to the point that I think they stopped wearing the red ones at one point. Hard to predict.
The red, although it looks better, seems kinda jinxed ...
both Oden and Pryzbilla were wearing red jerseys when they went down. Just saying!
Yeah, that was an ugly game
Dumb fouls, some frankly blown calls, no energy on D and only Dre was driving to the hoop.
Brandon Roy - The Savior Of Portland Basketball
by rise_stand_resist on Jan 18, 2010 2:45 PM PST reply actions
Thanks again NBA
As I recall this happened last year or maybe two years ago. The league schedules the Blazers to play what is to them a morning game against an east coast team. Big surprise our guys come out looking sluggish and not hitting their usual open shots. I’m not excusing the Blazers for not bringing the intensity, but the fact is that players become adapted to playing at a certain time of day and their internal clocks become hard wired. Personally, I have a lot more energy at 8 pm than I have a 8 am, because I run at this time every evening. This can be a huge disadvantage to a west coast team. Can someone please explain to me why the NBA chose to schedule this game for 10 am west coast time?
"I been ridin' the midnight train, got ice water in my veins." -Bob Dylan
"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice
Toronto loves these games too
And they seem to do very well in them for that reason.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Yeah I don't get that either...9 hours earlier is definitely unfair!
I was just going to comment on the same thing… Considering we usually play games at 7pm PST and we are playing away at 10 am PST, that makes for a 9 hour difference! It would be sort of like someone telling you have a 1 pm meeting on Fri and then saying, “BUT make sure you are in DC for the 4 am meeting on Monday.” Yeah right… ok …yeah thanks NBA…very freakin fair!
That is completely true. Studies etc. have been done on this and it is well documented.
This is the time of day the Blazers usually practice and this is what the Blazers energy level looked like…add in the travel, time of night they probably fell asleep….The NBA should NOT do this. PERIOD.
Lamarcus
Yes he had 22 & 15. But I swear this guy folds up like a lawn chair in the last 5 minutes of every game and someday that will bite us. He is scared to shoot and is basically a liability out there at the end of games. Dude needs to step up.
Perimeter D was bad, J Bay is as streaky as they come and we basically just dont have the talent right now to win ALL the games that we should.
Cant wait till Roy gets back
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
If we don't have the talent
why do you say they are games we should win?
I don’t put this in the “should” win category. Too many reasons why it was dangerous — they seem to have come together and started to play better (they may be getting that “us against the world” mentality that has helped us so much), early start, Brandon out, on the road, a shot-blocking center and a very good scoring PF (exactly the kind of team we’ve struggled against recently), etc, etc.
In normal circumstances, we should beat that team, but this was not normal at all.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Agreed
I used the “should win” phrase a little loosely, but I still feel like the Wizards are a terribly coached, out-of-sync team, that the Blazers could have beaten had anybody stepped up at the end of the game.
This isnt a terrible loss (due to us having nobody left) but the Victory was there and we just couldnt pull it out.
Ball handling and dribbling are my strongest weaknesses."—David Thompson
It was definitely a "could have won" game
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Although I felt Washington is a team Portland should be able to beat ...
… even in the shape we are in, I also felt it was exactly the sort of game we could lose – for the reasons you mention.
Now if we beat the Sixer’s, I’m good, as Philadelphia is a team that has Portland’s number. I’m at the point I count any game against them as a loss.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Yeah, it's almost like LA in Portland
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
It's difficult to be too critical about this game
Losses happen. It looked like the Blazers got a couple of outside shots going early and then stayed infatuated with the jumper long after the ball stopped going in the hoop. This is a game where they really miss Oden. Howard gives a good effort though. If Roy was back, the Blazers may have won, but it would have just continued to mask the lack of a low post game. Aldridge had some good numbers, but he doesn’t leave one with the impression of ‘inside presence’. Has he reached his ceiling? This is where McMillan needs to work on his game plan. When the jumpers aren’t falling, they have to go to the rim. Better yet, go to the rim before they try jumpers. It’d be good to have some idea how to do so. Besides, if they work on it now, it’ll be so much easier to incorporate Oden (or whatever low post player they’re gonna have to get) into the action.
I liked the description above about the ‘veteran knack of knowing how to score against a particular opponent’. This is that ‘veteran presence’ that was being talked about in the offseason. If players and coaches are taking notes, it’s invaluable.
With Roy we win this game
You could see the difference in one possession late where LMA should have gone up but passed out of a good shot. He needs to be confident taking the big shot.
That being said, LMA played probably his best game of the year.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
Further thoughts on today
1. Goddang refs.
2. We win that with Roy.
3. Bayless needs to play more like he did late in the game throughout the game, force them to foul you.
4. TO LMA, don’t be discouraged, you played very well and the only reason we’re in that game is because of you.
5. To Dre, I love you man, you are definitely a fit.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
I love 'Dre too!
All those people who said ‘Dre isn’t fitting in, go eat grass!!! This month he is killing it!!!
Eat grass yourself :)
The fact that he’s fitting in the last 8 games or so doesn’t mean he was fitting in earlier. Both can be true, and are in this case.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
RE: 2.
Heck, they win that with Trout too. They were desperate for somebody to step up and take a clutch shot. They looked like they were playing hot potato the last 3 minutes.
I’m also willing to wager that not long into the future Batum will be equally willing to take and nail the shot in that situation.
Awful, atrocious, defense. How does LMA get 22 and 15 and still manage to look soft?
LeMarcus is a good role player, but I can’t imagine ever being able to rely on him against tough teams or down the stretch of any game. When Blake was ready to rumble with Dwight Howard in the previous game LMA looked like he was ready to run for his mother when Vince Carter put his hand on his shoulder and said something to him.
"Brandon eats first around here" - KP
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 18, 2010 4:13 PM PST reply actions
I know it, I'm always amazed when I look at his stat line.
That he pulls down as many boards and puts up as many points as he does is great, but he could be incredible if he would just get it in his head that he can be tough. There are countless times he gets the ball on the elbow with a defender on his back and he looks around like a lost puppy. If he would just spin around his man (doing that thing where he steps around his leg so he can’t get in front of him) he would be a step away from a wide open bucket it would add so much to his game. LMA is good – really good – but it kills me a little to think about how great he could be.
by ShannyMcShanShan on Jan 18, 2010 4:43 PM PST up reply actions
he will not be great :(
I remember thinking that about sheed and then one day I just realized his ceiling was mental. Both of them just don’t want to be the man when push comes to shove, to take responsibility for wins and losses.
by Sound_Automatic on Jan 18, 2010 10:24 PM PST up reply actions
LA could go 10 - 10 from the field, scoring 32 and rebounding 15+ boards ...
… throwing in a half dozen assists, 2 steals, 5 blocks and harrass his guy into a below avewrage scoring night, plus sing the national anthem, hand out hot towels during timeouts and prepare the post game meal and people would still criticize him for not solving the Middle East conflict and stopping global warming.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
it’s not like the criticism is unfounded. Dave had an issue with LMA’s defense as well, and he didn’t score in the fourth quarter. If we aren’t going to criticize and praise players for what they do and don’t do, then why come to a Blazer blog?
#52 #10 #25 #88
I wasn't referring to Dave.
As to the second part …
… to share our love and enthusiasm for the team and players. To ask questions which expand our knowledge and understand of the game or the team. To learn little things about the team and players we might not see in the papers. To read insightful analysis from fans whose love of the team and game drives them to collate stats, create matrix’s, break down videop replays, etc. As a one stop shopping spot for news or links related to the Blazers.
I’d say coming to listen to or spout criticism is rather far down on the list. Anybody can be a critic. And if you are a loud mouth with an ability to run it on the radio, you might even get your own show like that jackass we see on the ads during Blazer games (don’t know if he’s Issac or Big Suke).
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
This one was a disappointment however
was a bit shocked when Mike B said they’d just arrived the night before … leading me to believe that they needed a double espresso followed by Gatorade for this game to wake up. I’ve flown to the East coast quite a bit and for the first couple days had a hard time adjusting to the time difference, much less being expected to get up earlier the next morning and play a real game not practice at 10 am. It’s not an excuse but would’ve thought someone would have taken that into account.
I’m disappointed we lost, and that Martell and Rudy had such a bad shot (willing to give Rudy a break for a few more games since he just came back) but have faith they’ll get it all sorted out as a team before the Philly game!
Shorter versions of recaps needed
Dave, you’re a great writer. And you’ve got an amazing amount of knowledge. How about giving us an ‘Executive Summary’ at the top of the recaps for those who want to cut to the chase?
For this game, it might be: “The Blazers made 52% of their two-point shots, and 94% of their free throws. That’s normally good enough to win. However, they also made just 18% (3 of 17) of their three-pointers, and that’s normally bad enough to lose. Which they did, 97-92 to the Wizards.”
Keep up the good work.
well, why not just really get down to it ?
Wizzards 97, Blazers 92 :-)
"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener
Even simpler:
:(
Hopefully the next game’re cap:
:)
by JonathanPDX on Jan 19, 2010 12:02 AM PST up reply actions
I suppose I could invert the general stat summary
that I usually do after the game flow, putting it at the top. I don’t usually like to do that because sometimes the stats can be misleading out of context.
—Dave
Could you go with something light-hearted?
I could see a “Long Story Short” section with a couple of generalities about the game, perhaps exaggerated a bit in humorous form. For instance today’s might have been
“The Blazers forget their Red Bull, settling for deep jumpers and shallow defense in a completely forgettable loss to the Wizards.”
—Dave
I think that would be cool
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Your game summary length is fine. You do a great job actually and THANK YOU.
I would have included that part that the Blazers got behind when Miller was out and caught up when he was in…and at the end he foulded out…truly probably his part of the being off due to the 10am schedule was drawing fouls.
The 10am thing does make a HUGE difference in body clocks. The NBA shouldn’t schedule this sort of game. Hey here’s an idea…schedule two EAST coast teams to play at 1pm on the East coast. And Especially the FIRST game of the road trip at that time…not good.
Everybody is a critic.
When are you going to realize you can’t be too long or too short. Until you are just right, you will never experience success.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
He does.
It’s called a box score and Dave puts in a link to it. All you have to do is scan down to it, skipping all those wordy things he clutters up the post with.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
And I'm suggesting that what he wants is already being provided.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Dave, you were too easy on both Bayless and Miller
Bayless was the only starter with a negative +/- with a -9. That was worse than any player on the team.
Miller cried to the media to start and then to end games and then he fouled out. I would expect a “veteran point guard” to manage his fouls better. Point guards are not supposed to foul out of a game that did not go into overtime. UNACCEPTABLE!
Veteran PGs
with 10+ years of experience are supposed to know when the ref is going to call a foul on them, and yank the guy’s whistle out of his mouth, making it look like the bad guys did it.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
I'm just waiting for tomorrow
Folks will come in and blame Nate, saying he should have sat Miller after 2 fouls.
I think the entire team was off due to the stupid time of the game. Body clocks do very much
influence how well people perform. It’s well documented. Here’s an idea…why not schedule 2 EAST coast teams to the obnoxious 1pm game. And especially the FIRST game of the road trip. Not at all FAIR. Andre’s body clock was off in that he drew fouls…the rest of the team was slow on defense and not getting their shots….give them ALL a break. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. Really tom…look up the studies on body clocks.
Why aren't the kids playing a little more?
I didn’t get to catch this game because I was working though MLK, but it seems to me that Nate is treating Juwan Howard like he’s Joel Przybilla.
Why don’t Pendy and/or DC play more?
Juwan has had some inspiring outings this year, at times. But he was in the league when MJ was winning championships. Bottom line, dude is really fricking old. He should not and cannot perform at a high level with his minutes in the upper thirties.
Pendergraph should be playing more than 16 minutes and DC should be playing more than 6 (or whatever). Although Juwan has had some nice games, both the young pups have been more productive with their minutes. (I believe Juwan’s probably been part of the reason for that – he’s really embraced the mentor role and showed these guys the ropes.)
Juwan playing much better than expected and showing the heart of a champion is a bit different than Juwan being a solid NBA rotation player at this stage of his career. Juwan should be doing a little more mentoring and a little less playing right now.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Jan 19, 2010 5:37 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Agree--Pendy and DC should be spelling the starters more.
Even if they don’t provide much offensive threat, their defensive hustle makes them an asset on the court.
by RenoBlazerFan on Jan 19, 2010 6:22 AM PST up reply actions
Defense was a major factor in the loss.
JP and DC provide more defense and rebounding than Rudy, Blake, or Juwan. And none of the three were setting the world on fire offensively.
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 19, 2010 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
This one is easy to answer.
Because Nate sucks.
Anybody with even a half decent understanding of the game would know that Portland’s season is basically a lost cause and they have nothing to lose by playing all their rookies and 2nd year guys.
And more advanced students of the game recognize that an aging, undersized PF playing significant minutes at center is just asking for an eventual breakdown.
It has been documented here repeatedly that once Nate comes up with a lineup, he never, ever varies from it. Preferring to ram the iceburg and let the ship sink rather than order a change in course.
Yep, the sooner KP recognizes the root cause of all of our problems, the sooner the Blazers are drinking bubbly and getting fitted for their rings.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Anybody with even a half decent understanding of the game would know that Portland’s season is basically a lost cause and they have nothing to lose by playing all their rookies and 2nd year guys.
Apparently I got the other half of decent that you got
#7, #10, #25, #52, #88
by The Arkitect on Jan 19, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions
I think we are working from the same half.
I’m parodizing the line of thinking often posted here about how Nate, if not completely suck ass, is at a minimum the wrong coach for Portland.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by 


































