Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Media Row Report: Blazers 102, Magic 87

The dominant question before tonight's game: "Will Brandon Roy play?"  Mixed signals were everywhere.  Roy was listed as a probable starter in the stats sheet and his number was included on the Rose Garden scoreboard in the starting lineup yet he was nowhere to be found during pre-game warmups.  As word started to get out that his ailing right hamstring would keep Roy from playing in a nationally-televised game right as Dwight Howard -- part man, part superhuman -- took the court to warm-up, there was some anxiety and resignation in the air. Those feelings lasted for no more than 12 minutes as the Blazers sprinted out to a 24-14 first quarter lead and never looked back, thumping the Orlando Magic 102-87 in the Rose Garden.

Some unexpected wins are the result of complicated gimmicks, mixed-and-matched defenses, unpredictable rotations, lucky execution or kind officiating.  Tonight's win for the Blazers couldn't have been simpler.  They brought energy and focus (6 steals and 6 turnovers); the Magic didn't (3 steals, 12 turnovers).  They were hot from deep (11 of 21 on threes); the Magic weren't (7 of 30 on threes).  And, most importantly, they crashed the glass early, often, on time and late, overcoming the absence of their two best centers and doing a more-than-reasonable job containing Howard, the league's premier pivot man.  

Tonight's game pitted two of the league's top six rebounding teams (by rebound rate) and it included Howard, who ranks second in the league in that category individually.  While Howard led the Magic with 11 boards, the Blazers diligently sealed him off of the offensive glass and made him work for everything he got on the defensive glass too.  It was a comical scene at times, as Howard looked to be outnumbered 5 to 1 as he battled for rebounds while his teammates jogged back downcourt. "They did send a lot of bodies at me," Howard told me after the game. "Their job is to frustrate me. I can't allow that to affect the way I play. When I do allow it to affect me, we don't play good."

All the extra attention clearly affected Howard. He was plagued with early foul trouble which was compounded by a double technical that he was assessed for getting tangled up with Blazers guard Steve Blake right as the first half ended.  Blake appeared to grab and hold Howard's jersey as they jockeyed for position in the paint.  "He just bearhugged me," Howard told me with a shake of his head. "He had me wrapped up. I tried to just get him off and tried look at the ref.  But the ref thinks, 'oh, you're bigger than everybody and stronger.' But if somebody is holding you, there's only one way to get them off, it's with force."  Blake responded to the shove from Howard with an obscenity and a take-no-prisoners glare that brought chuckles from media members during the game and reflected the overall intensity the Blazers displayed from start to finish.

Nate McMillan praised virtually every aspect of his team's performance tonight and agreed that the overall effort on the defensive boards was a difference-maker.  "Without our centers being in the lineup, we're going to need everybody to come to the board because we're small," McMillan told me. "The games where we've lost, I think it's been due to teams just pounding us in the paint."

Indeed, in Blazers victory this season they are outrebounding their opponents by an average of 42-38.  In Blazers losses, they are being outrebounded by their opponents 40 to 36.

Tonight McMillan listed off half the active roster in singling guys out for their board work.  "Our guys are doing a great job, Martell, DC, Howard, Jeff, LaMarcus, our guards coming back and rebounding the ball."  LaMarcus Aldridge led the way with 14 rebounds and Martell Webster tacked on 9 rebounds, including 8 on the defensive end.  

After the game, Webster said the team's rebounding success is a product of player-to-player motivation as much as it is a message from the coaching staff.   "It's more of a crew thing," Webster smiled. "We [as players] talk about it. We know we have to get in there and rebound. Not only does Coach emphasize getting in there and getting rebounds but we do on the court [too]. If we get five guys in there it gives us an advantage because they usually have two of their guards back. If we get five guys in there rebounding, we're probably going to come out with most of them."

So who is leading this crew? "I'm trying," Webster admitted, smiling again. "But LA is leading it. I'm trying to get in there and battle. It's a little team competition [for rebounds] but it's all for the good."  That statement is surely music to Nate McMillan's (and just about every coach at every level of basketball's) ears.  When talented players buy into a system, put forth maximum effort and self-motivate the energy level, really good things can happen.

Like beating a top 5 team in the league without your team captain and best player.  

Random Game Notes
  • Will Brandon Roy play on Monday against the Washington Wizards?  Nate McMillan: "I don't know. We'll have to see."
  • All 19 players that saw game action scored at least 1 point tonight.  Pretty cool.
  • Magic forward Matt Barnes could not have been more disgusted with his team's lack of effort and intensity, spewing profanities without care in the locker room post-game and repeating that it was on every individual Magic player to bring his best effort every night.  "We're loaded," Barnes quipped, "We should be undefeated on paper." And then later, "Talk is cheap. We gotta knock people down like they're knocking Dwight down."
  • True to his word in this recent Blazers.com video, Rudy Fernandez flashed his 3 finger sign after connecting from downtown and then pointed to Travis Outlaw on the bench.
  • Jerryd Bayless minutes watch: 20 minutes, 0-6 shooting, 1 point, 1 rebound, 3 assists, 1 turnover.  Two early fouls limited his impact on the game's opening minutes as he got his second career start in Roy's absence.  The time for Bayless to step up was yesterday.
  •  Steve Blake, on the other hand, was as active on both ends and as accurate from the field as he's been all year, fearlessly knocking down 4 three pointers and tying his season-high with 18 points.  Blake and Andre Miller combined for 15 of the team's 23 assists (on 41 field goals).  Great pace to the ball movement all night long.
  • I asked Dante Cunningham after the game what it was like to guard Dwight Howard one-on-one.  "I get that question a lot from my friends back home. They're always like 'you're going up against LeBron, you're going up against Kobe and Dwight.' Coming into the NBA it was kind of like, 'wow, those are superstars.' But now that we're playing, I'm in the mix with them, I'm banging with them, it's almost like they are another player to me. And that's how you honestly have to treat it.   
  • What was his strategy against Howard tonight? Cunningham said, "Just use my quickness on him. Staying low. If I had to give a foul give it to him. What did he shoot from the line? [3 for 10] I mean that was a good gamble. When he did get at me I made him work hard for it."
  • In terms of charisma with the media: Dwight Howard > Kobe Bryant >>>>>>>> LeBron James. His bowtie might be a little bit unnecessary but his smile is as genuine as it gets, his self-assessments were thoughtful and honest, and his answers were patient and well-delivered.  A polished guy in every sense of the word.
  • Blazers Owner Paul Allen was once again at the game tonight, surely loving every minute of it.

Nate McMillan's Post Game Comments

Again great basketball by our guys. They just keep stepping up and rising to the occasion. I was asked earlier how a re we winning, is it 1 or 2 players that's making the difference in this stretch where we've won games without players? It's not. It's been a collective effort. Not only the players but also my coaching staff. We just keep stepping up and tonight it was everybody again. I thought the first unit did a great job of establishing themselves, the second unit got their rhythm in the second half and beat a very good team.

This game represents your season?

We're playing good basketball. We're playing the game the right way. We're playing the game together. I think that must happen regardless of who you have. Whether we have all of our guys together because I've seen it go the other way. Where you're not playing together and you're worried about different things and all of a sudden it blows up. This group is coming out, they're playing hard, they're playing together and they beat the Magic tonight. Executing, defensively we were aggressive, offensively we got 87 attempts so we were attacking and we had a lot of energy tonight.

Are you used to playing without guys?

It's not a shocker to us any more, to these guys. To have to be called on to step up and play or fill in for a guy. It's still a challenge. The month of December, that was difficult to handle. When you were losing guys for the season and tonight Brandon we found out, most of these guys found out right before the game that he wasn't playing. But they just keep having themselves ready and they're productive when they get their opportunity.

Forwards limited Dwight Howard to 11 and 11.

Howard. It starts with Howard. Jeff. LaMarcus. DC saw some time on him. We tried to mix up our defense on him. They did a good job of just making him work, beating him to his spots. I thought our guards did a good job of mixing up their defense, double-teaming, faking the double team, rotating out to their shooters. We had to defend the 3 ball and we did a good job of defending the 3 also. So that's a tough team to defend when you have a guy like Howard in the post who can score. But that 3 point threat and being able to cover both. Our guys did a great job of rotating out and then getting back and rebounding. We controlled the boards tonight.

What's been the difference for Martell recently?

I think he's getting comfortable with the League. That position as far as what we are asking him to do. Knowing where his shots are coming from. He's knocking them down. We felt if he can continue to be consistent like that that's what he's in there for. We feel like he has the ability to defend, he's strong, he's quick, he can rebound and he also can shoot the ball and he's doing those three things for us. Which, Greg and Brandon and those guys are out there that would open up that paint a lot more. He's knocking those shots down so we need him to continue to do that.

Andre's Game

I thought he was good. I thought he was really good. Nice floor game, his plus minus is off the charts especially for this game. He's just making things happen. He's taking advantage of situations, we're putting both he and Brandon in the post a lot more and they've been able to make good decisions.

23 assists and only 6 turnovers

Well, moving the ball, we wanted to speed up the tempo. I liked the fact that we got 87 attempts at the basket and we feel like if we get movement that we're going to knock down some shots. They moved the ball. We're getting it to the guards, they're creating and we're moving the ball.

Team defensive rebounding

Well we're going to need that. Without our centers being in the lineup, we're going to need everybody to come to the board because we're small. The games where we've lost I think it's been due to teams just pounding us in the paint. Our guys are doing a great job, Martell, DC, Howard, Jeff, LaMarcus, our guards coming back and rebounding the ball.

Blake and Rudy are back

It's good to knock down some shots and we struggled early tonight. We were what 52 percent from the 3. When Blake and Rudy and Martell, we had guys that can shoot the ball, they're knocking down their shots, we tend to play better defensively. They like to see the ball go in. Defensively they bring a lot of energy. So we can shoot it we just gotta move it.

Do you feel like you're starting to get over the hump with injuries?

This will be for the season. We're at the halfway point right now. We're doing some good things but we still don't have Travis, we stil ldon't have Greg, we still don't have Joel and Nicolas and a couple of those guys won't be back so this will be a challenge, a fight for the rest of the season to stay in this race and to give ourselves a chance to get to the playoffs.

LaMarcus

I thought his last two games we fed off of his energy. He's done some great work in the post, great work on the defensive end of the floor and he's playing really good basketball and we're going to need that because we're going to play off both he and Brandon.

Do you expect Brandon to play Monday?

I don't know. We'll have to see.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

Comment 72 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I said before the game

That we had to make Howard angry because he doesn’t play well when he’s angry. Mission accomplished and the expected result occurred.

A few more thoughts:

In the first half. I was there and I don’t think I have ever seen such a flat effort from what is supposed ot be a good team. On three straight plays in the second quarter, Dwight got pulled away from the basket and it was almost like someone put a sign out that said, "No defense here, go ahead and dunk it."

Oh and for a while in the third it was like the Blazers were playing NBA Jam (the old version) in "On Fire" mode. It didn’t matter what they threw up (especially Blake) as it went in.

During one late timeout, Stan Van was in one corner with his coaches and all the players were lazing on the bench looking like they didn’t’ care.

Finally, Stan Van started gesturing towards his team (and probably saying some choice words). They didn’t react, at all, just stayed there lazing around. Nice metaphor for their performance tonight.

Also, FWIW, we raised a HUGE amount of money for Haiti (I thought I heard someone say it was for $60k).

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 16, 2010 1:47 AM PST reply actions  

I know

What was strangest for me was the Orlando didn’t even try for the offensive board most of the time, they just ran back on D. They could have probably had a bunch more points had they tried.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Jan 16, 2010 2:17 AM PST up reply actions  

The only part of Bayless' game that is deficient is his shot - and that is streaky

If his overall play was poor – i’d be worried. However, his shot will fall more consistently with time.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2010 2:02 AM PST reply actions  

I hope so.

But it better be soon with the guards returning, or he’s gonna get buried on the bench again.

by ShannyMcShanShan on Jan 16, 2010 2:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Bayless may not have scored

But he collapsed the defense and opened up Martell and Steve and Rudy for bombing threes from downtown. I’ll take that if the threes are falling.

"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave

by DonkeyShins on Jan 16, 2010 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Oden interview

Would somebody please post a link to Oden’s interview from tonight in the fanshots? I wasn’t able to hear it due to the volume being muted at the venue where I was watching the game.
I love reading your game recaps Mr. Ben, thank you.

by LewisClark on Jan 16, 2010 2:09 AM PST reply actions  

here

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4831099&categoryid=2459788

bayless leaves over my dead body
if you should strike Oden down he will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
#52
#4
#24
Washington Huskies=2011 Rose Bowl Champions

by thomasikehara on Jan 16, 2010 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, moving the ball, we wanted to speed up the tempo.

Nate, don’t be a tease.

by Epimenides on Jan 16, 2010 2:43 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I'd like to add onw more game note

best sign for the day – probably one of the best I’ve ever seen – “Dwight, I am your father” with Juwan’s smiling headshot. Hilarious!!!

by iverigma2 on Jan 16, 2010 3:37 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

Agreed!

I think they should have left it up longer on the screen, so that the Blazer bench could have caught a glimpse of it.

by Memphremagog on Jan 16, 2010 8:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Should of said

Dwight, guess whose your daddy tonight!

by Hermistonmelons on Jan 16, 2010 8:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I loved the PACE

I'm going on a Dave boycott until AK1984 is brought back.

"Did they really expect me to bow down to Jesus?!?" ~Sophia

by Philthyanimal on Jan 16, 2010 3:42 AM PST reply actions  

Wow.

We just beat a team that starts Dwight Howard, Vince Carter, Rashard Lewis, and Jameer Nelson. I’m loving the way we’re playing right now. Awesome win. Hope we can keep it up.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jan 16, 2010 8:16 AM PST reply actions  

2-0 without Brandon Roy

23-16 with him.

Our winning percentage is 41 points higher when he’s out.

Guy’s obviously a cancer. Horrible contract we signed last summer.

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 16, 2010 8:42 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

And those two teams were the Spurs and Magic

So the key to this season is sit Roy against elite teams.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 16, 2010 8:51 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

It's funny how the negatives

have probably done more for the harmony of this team than any well laid plan to team building.
  Injuries, the blow up with Miller & Nate, and even Roy sitting on the sidelines last night (Roy gets a look at the rest of the team playing without him)
  The path to wisdom has many avenues

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Adversity usually strengthens people

That’s why the armed forces used to make basic training so tough. I don’t know if they still do or not, seeing as the British army sometimes says “bang” when practicing instead of actually firing weapons to save on costs. Seems like if you’re doing that, you’ve probably given up on toughening people up….

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 16, 2010 12:54 PM PST up reply actions  

So that’s why the Blazers lost to Houston last year.

by Epimenides on Jan 16, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I love the toughness last night!

They played tough all night, but the most memorable moment of this game was the double technical incident. Blake trying to block out gets pushed under the basket by Howard. Blake wants it known he’s not gonna get pushed around, locks up Howard with his arms and gives a glare. When Howard gives a hard push to Blake, LaMarcus is right there making sure he’s got his teammate’s back. They would not let Howard intimidate them. Great attitude from both of them on that sequence.

by 52therim on Jan 16, 2010 9:52 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

LaMartacus!! and Nate

I saw a sign in the crowd with the above name for LA…very cool.

As for Nate, he seems to be riding the hot hand a little better than usual lately. He went with Blake last night because he was hot. With a lot of players coming back Nate will have to use them wisely.

by dawgman47 on Jan 16, 2010 9:52 AM PST reply actions  

Anyone who thinks Nate isn't that good

I really, really hope this sends a message. He has the respect of this team and is managing it well.

by seasnake333 on Jan 16, 2010 10:16 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think it's the other way around

Nate has gained some new found respect for the rest of the team….A team that played without Roy and proved a lot by just playing the game the best they could. When you have players that “gut check” the way they did last night, it tends to put coaching in the background. The 53% from 3 point land…How do you coach that? well, you leave the hot hand in the game, of course.
    It’s not about Nate’s coaching ability at all. It’s about being wise enough to learn from your mistakes and being able to adjust. This is all most people want from Nate….Nobody in this world is perfect. Nate is a smart enough man and has enough coaching skills to recognize it’s the players that will make or break a team. The coach is always the fall guy (it comes with the territory)

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

That has the ring of...

…when we win it’s the players…when we lose it’s the coach…

There is nothing wrong with saying Nate is doing a good job right now… because he is… and so are the players. Success comes from everybody doing their job and that’s what’s being done right now.

Nate takes ALOT of heat from some people on here that I don’t think he deserves. But then again there is a lot of second guessing of many of the guys. You are correct in that he is not perfect and neither is anyone else. But combining the best of peoples strengths while minimizing their weakness’ makes for a pretty strong unit… like the one we’ve seen the last two games.

All I’m saying is that if it’s going to be “about” Nate’s coaching when we lose… It’s also "about " it when we win!

GO BLAZERS!!!

by Ilikeemall on Jan 16, 2010 11:25 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You should change your ring tone

and have your hearing checked. Because you have no basis to conclude I’m in any camp. because I’m not.

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions  

No Basis?..
It’s not about Nate’s coaching ability at all.

I’m not exactly reading between the lines…and my hearing is fine.

by Ilikeemall on Jan 16, 2010 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I also said this
An excellent coaching strategy by Nate

what does that tell you….About as much as your quote…Like I said you have no basis, but keep digging.
However IMO You should give it a rest. No one is interested in this thread. And I’m not interested in fighting a pointless battle with you

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 12:05 PM PST up reply actions  

No you didn't...

You responded to a guy saying something positive about Nate in a post game thread…after a great effort by the whole team… by saying literally and figuratively that Nate had nothing to do with it.

Spin yourself as neutral if you like… I don’t buy it! Give your opinion all you like… I have my own and will do so also. IMO if you’re going to have an opinion at least have the onions to stick by it instead of denying your intent… You sound like a politician.

Feel free to respond or to “give it a rest”… it’s a free Country.

Great job Blazers… Keep it up!!!

by Ilikeemall on Jan 16, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

was that a full body slam?

If so, can I get up now? I need to go out and check on the grass. I swear I saw it growing, but I think I need a measurement. Nothing like some facts to support what could just be your imagination.
   Think of this as a white flag. I don’t want you to keep pounding your chest so hard. You might hurt yourself.

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you Moon Walking?..

…or back peddling?..

Very imaginative non-sense you wrote there… I guess…

by Ilikeemall on Jan 16, 2010 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

neither,I was just allowing you to get last word

  I thought that it was important to you.
    But you seem to want to continue down the self-righteous path of blinded homer flag waving. So if you question that I’m not neutral then I would appreciate you getting the category right. I’m on the opposite side of gushy fans that just cheer no matter what happens. I think basketball opinions are generally weak from that side. It doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t get to participate, it just means I don’t weigh their opinions that heavily ,when it comes to a more open opinion on how the game is played. All of my views are never based on one game. I have always looked at it from a much larger picture.

Your read is incorrect and bias towards your agenda.(defender of Nate) I asked you to go back and read for full context and you chose to counter with character assassination . You take things out of context and so you lose merit in your argument. I don’t expect you to change your stand, even though you are mistaken.

All I’m saying is that if it’s going to be "about" Nate’s coaching when we lose… It’s also "about " it when we win!
You said this….Show me where Ive said anything what-so-ever- about blame for wins or loses, by either the coach or players. It simply does not exist. So the ring you hear did not have any qualification to accuse me of Nate bashing like was your purpose…It was you that put the spin on it.
   I have said repeatedly that in the NBA , it’s 90 % players and the rest coaching. Ive commented on players and coaches from other teams as well. Here’s a block quote from one of my past comments
In the NBA, it’s all about the players. Coaches get kicked around even when they have bad players. You could take several titles away from Phil Jackson if he didn’t have MJ and Pippin or Kobe and Gasol or Shaq. Boston did not win a title because of their coach either. If Cleveland wins one it won’t be because of Mike Brown. (although he’s smart enough to let Lebron and co. play the way they want)
Saying this is not saying that Nate, or any other coach, has no influence on the outcome of the game. It simply says what it says ; 90% players, 10 % coaching… Now that could easily be reversed in practice sessions (where I think coaches have their greatest influence)
   You could have the best game plan and be the best coach in the world, but if the players don’t execute, the shots don’t fall, they don’t play “D”, etc. then what can the coach do about that? He’s simply less responsible for the final outcome (win or lose) than some would like to inject. It may be more than 90-10, but it is still less than the players.

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Apparently that last word thing is important to YOU...

and lots of ’em…

I am glad you consider your brand of fandom superior to mine… Good for you!

But you seem to want to continue down the self-righteous path of blinded homer flag waving

I’m on the opposite side of gushy fans that just cheer no matter what happens. I think basketball opinions are generally weak from that side.

Do you see the irony in calling me self-righteous? I find it rather comical that you seem to consider yourself a superior basketball mind simply based on the fact that I may “cheer no matter what happens”. You seem to equate support with ignorance.

If you see my post as character assasination I think you may be a little defensive. I’m sorry I disagreed with your obviously unquestionable logic…

by Ilikeemall on Jan 16, 2010 8:08 PM PST up reply actions  

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

doesn’t spell “good coach”

Injuries have made Nate’s job easier, not more difficult.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2010 12:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I guffawed audibly...

You have a GREAT sense of humor.

  RoadBlazer

by Roadblazer on Jan 16, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

now, now

Nate’s rotation decisions were simplified to the point of “no-brainer”, and his “system” style of offense is a better fit for a depleted roster than a more dynamic offense….

Nate’s job will get tougher as he tries to juggle more pieces (not a task he has shown good results for, so far)….

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

So why DOESN'T Greg sit with the team during games?

Just out of curiosity… is it b/c he’s too awkward with a brace and crutches? Can’t really sit with his knee bent? That was my thinking…

I would kill to be at the RG the first game he actually sits with the team. Place will go NUTS.

:)

by pdxrob on Jan 16, 2010 10:28 AM PST reply actions  

Yeah, I'm thinking with all the people and equipment around near the bench

they don’t want to risk him tripping on anything. Not to mention, I don’t think the team really wants him limping around with a cane in front of 20,000 people and national TV cameras.

"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."

by Arby on Jan 16, 2010 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

The Blazers feed showed a short clip after the intros of Penergraph

doing his war dance in the center of the team huddle before tipoff. Anyone catch that? Another team watching him might worry a little bit about his, well, stability…

by raoulduke on Jan 16, 2010 10:47 AM PST reply actions  

that's a good thing

But I still don’t think he’ll become a Rodman. (his own teammates were wondering about him)

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 11:03 AM PST up reply actions  

and I might add

An excellent coaching strategy by Nate (He probably told Penergraph he would start him, if he promised to do that war dance in the huddle) It looked like Howard must have watched, and decided he wasn’t going to test this guy.

by WyEast on Jan 16, 2010 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Pendy is fast becoming a favorite...

Guy is EXACTLY what this team has been missing since Przyz went down. A little crazy, a little mean, a lot tough, and a ton of energy energy ENERGY.

Imagine if Lamarcus had 15 more lbs of muscle and Pendy’s attitude?? That would be scary… scary good in fact.

by pdxrob on Jan 16, 2010 11:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd go as far as saying

that having pendy is better than if we had somehow landed Milsap or Bass. Pendy can be humble enough to know his role, and stay hungry coming off the bench. Sort of reminds me a little of Mark Bryant back in the day.

by superfly05 on Jan 16, 2010 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I Loved Mark Bryant

I think Pendy has more upside potential though. I think there isn’t a team in thisleague that can’t look at this stretch by the Blazers and say, “I think this guy is an NBA player and we could use him”

by Hermistonmelons on Jan 17, 2010 7:58 AM PST up reply actions  

You hit it on the nose...

my favorite player to watch lately has been Pendergraph. He is funny off the court but all BALLS on the court. I compared him to a young Rodman a few games ago. I’m sure if opponents are probably saying “WTF is up with this guy?”

by clinchmobb on Jan 16, 2010 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Its official, the key to winning for this team is adversity

Next season Nate needs to personally beat one player up before every game.

"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez

by TheGreatMon on Jan 16, 2010 11:01 AM PST reply actions  

Early in the season, many were saying "To many guys not enough minutes"

THat may or may not be true. The other possibility is the guys needed minutes with each other and to learn their roles.

We will never know which is true as the original group didn’t get the chance.

However, Miller and Roy have gotten some minutes. They are playing much better together. I am not worried about what happens when everyone gets back.. Enough guys have played togeher (Miller, Wester, Roy) to get used to each other that this team will play just fine.

I also think these Players have taken a Mantra on about being a Rebounding team and Playng Defense. A good Identity to have going forward

by Hermistonmelons on Jan 17, 2010 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

I think the Blazers should have one key guy out for every game

It really brings up their intensity.

(I know they have a bunch of key guys out, but who isn’t ALREADY injured)

Life is hilarious.

by SolGoode on Jan 16, 2010 11:03 AM PST reply actions  

"We're playing the game together"

And that, Nate, is why the Blazers keep winning. We don’t rely on a superstar to carry us when things get rough. the TEAM comes together, fights through adversity and clobbers teams we have no business beating otherwise because we play as a team.

Brandon Roy - The Savior Of Portland Basketball

by rise_stand_resist on Jan 16, 2010 11:13 AM PST reply actions  

So true.

I think Roy in iso should only be used 50% of the time down the stretch. He and LMA should learn how to run Utah style pick and rolls together.

I'm just not crazy about player nick names...

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 16, 2010 11:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Was that a wire-to-wire win?

If it was, we just beat both of the teams from last years finals wire-to-wire in a week. Blazers gettin’ it DONE! LaMarcus was awesome and Pendy is tied with Juwan for the suprise of this season. Love Pendy in the pregame circle freak.. “He’s a circle-freak, circle-freak, he’s circle-freakin’ neooow! Blazers sing, Woah…ooooooooooe……”

by blazersrmyteam on Jan 16, 2010 11:33 AM PST reply actions  

More kudos to KP and the coaches

These guys are playing hard and with a chip on their collective shoulder. Their efforts could easily snowball into a 50 win season.

I also think playing Dwight small is the way to go. Move him around and make him work—-the Magic don’t have another body in their starting lineup that can bang. Teams with two or more bangers have been thumping the Blazers. Teams with one have not. Could it be that simple? As such, I like how the Blazers match up against any team in the West outside of Memphis and Denver. Those teams would be beasts to deal with in the playoffs…

Also, Orlando could really use a Pendy type player to add some muscle at ‘4’.

I'm just not crazy about player nick names...

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 16, 2010 11:36 AM PST reply actions  

Yes, it's as simple as that

Two big guys = trouble. One, we can handle.

That’s why we had trouble with the Clippers, too. We managed them at home, but not on the road. And that’s why we had trouble with Philly with Brand in the game.

It will be interesting to see how we handle LA with Gasol back. You wouldn’t call him a banger, but he’s big and tough, and we’ll want LMA against him, which means he won’t be on Bynum.

#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!

by jscot on Jan 16, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I love the character and attitude that Juwan & Pendy bring to this club

Their outgoing personalities and team spirit help keep the others loose out on the floor.

Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by Net Ranger on Jan 16, 2010 12:19 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think I've ever been more excited as a Blazer fan than in this game.

 Everything, from watching Pendy’s death stare to enjoying Webster aggressively letting loose was pure bliss. This team continues to amaze and continues to give reasons to follow.

It's a tune-out fest.

by The Pirate on Jan 16, 2010 1:26 PM PST reply actions  

Great game to watch...

Those few runs where EVERYTHING was dropping in for were awesome. Kudos to Blake for sticking it in their eye at the end. Props to Martell, this is what we have been expecting from him for some time. Miller was particularly nice when he full control of the tempo with Roy out and the ball in his hands more. His ‘old man game’ is money. LMA is earning my respect back. I don’t know what makes him click but I really love his game when he is into it. Long live Rodolfo. Good to see him back and raising 3 fingers. And of course, respect to Pendy, Howard, and Cunningham in their efforts on the ‘not so super’ man…

by clinchmobb on Jan 16, 2010 3:02 PM PST reply actions  

Great game,

I love these guys, they don’t quit. If LA played that way every night, I would get off my soap box about needing a true center. ( at least until the next time they get killed on the glass )

Go Blazers !!!!

Small ball does not win championships.....

Go Blazers !!

by FrenchieFan on Jan 16, 2010 8:25 PM PST reply actions  

I hope so,

if not, that’s just one more point to the argument that the Blazers need one more true center on the roster, and one less perimeter player.

Small ball does not win championships.....

Go Blazers !!

by FrenchieFan on Jan 17, 2010 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Don Nelson Small Ball doesn't

But by the same toekn, the Lakers weren’t so “Large and in Charge” either. Nor were some of Jordans teams. I say that with the admitted bias that I would personally like to see this teams personel stay the same for awhile

by Hermistonmelons on Jan 17, 2010 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree...

My memory isnt what it used to be, but seems to me like Jordan always had Cartwright or Longely. As far as the l@kers, they have had their share of big men. They didn’t win a championship with a 6’10" back up pf playing center.

Small ball does not win championships.....

Go Blazers !!

by FrenchieFan on Jan 18, 2010 6:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm quite often critical of McMillan's coaching

but he did a decent job in the Orlando game. Of course there were limitations with the people he could play. He did realize that Bayless wasn’t having a good game and didn’t play him as much as he might have yet still gave him a chance on the court. It’s good that he says he wants to speed up the tempo. Make sure Roy (when Roy is available) doesn’t bring the ball up the court so much. He’s got to be the slowest guard on the team. The best player, but slowest guard. The ‘point’ is taking too much of a toll on his wheels anyway. It’s nice that the 3 point shots were going down. The fact that there were a lot of open shots was due, it part, to a couple of players (notably Miller) attacking the rim. The other team has to respect that. It seems to me that the Blazers could have more than a 6’2" guard (and Roy) do that regularly. That helps open up the outside shot. A hot doesn’t always have to be the guy that ends up shooting the ball.

by rockman on Jan 17, 2010 5:01 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm