Media Row Report: Blazers 120, Bucks 108
It has been awhile since the Portland Trail Blazers have had a night like this. A media member falling asleep in his press row seat during the first quarter night. A get out on the break and let 'er rip (even Steve Blake!) second quarter night.A potential for Chalupas in the third quarter night. A "Come on Nate, get the starters out of there!!!!!!" fourth quarter night. A send the crowd home early because this win is getting boring and not even the wave is keeping this interesting night. And, yes, a Shavlik Randolph finally sees some court time night. It was all of those things and more tonight in the Rose Garden as the Blazers built a 33 point lead and cruised to a 120-108 victory over an overpowered Milwaukee Bucks.
If there was a single takeaway from tonight's big 31 point first quarter and 66 point first half, it was the truly promising flashes from a posting-up Andre Miller, who used his size and craftiness to bully his way to the basket against Brandon Jennings. The Bucks rookie could only throw up his hands in frustration or get out of the way as Miller accumulated 19 points on 6 of 8 shooting from the field and 7 of 12 from the free throw line.
While Miller has long been known as an effective back-to-the-basket player (I wrote earlier this year about how he practices turnaround moves from various post locations after practice), it's not a situation that the Blazers have gone to on offense much this season. But after the game it was clear that Nate McMillan liked what he saw from Miller in the post. "I thought he did a really nice job," McMillan told me. "We felt like we could post their guards so we wanted to put their guards in the post with Brandon and Miller."
McMillan was looking to force Milwaukee's team defense to make a decision: double-team Miller or Roy to force the ball from their hands or single-cover the bigger guards and take their chances. "I thought [Roy and Miller] did a good job in that first half of taking advantage of [the size advantage in the post-ups], making their reads. If [Milwaukee] didn't double team they scored, if they did they made good kickouts." The Blazers shooters responded knocking down 4 first-half 3 pointers to make life even more difficult for Milwaukee.
Random Game Notes
- Update: Roy left the game near the end due to a hamstring injury. "Hamstring was pretty sore during the third quarter. I made a move going to the middle, I passed it and kind of grabbed it. I just told Coach if you can keep me out, please do... it got tight, I asked Coach could I go back in, the trainer said, 'nah.' I had came and iced it right after the third quarter, I had to put ice on there. Yeah I expect [to play Friday.]"
- I asked Roy after the game whether he expected to move back to the 3 spot for stretches now that Rudy is healthy and working his way back into the rotation. Roy said, "I don't know. I haven't even thought about it really. I think Coach wants to get back to having those two lineups where Rudy plays with that second group. I'm sure as games get tougher and Rudy gets his legs back me and Rudy will definitely play some minutes together."
- Against teams with undersized guards utilizing a three guard lineup of Blake, Rudy and Roy makes a ton of sense. Even Bayless, Rudy and Roy has the potential to cause match-up difficulties. McMIllan's experimentation process for setting his guard rotations will be the most interesting thing to watch play out over the next month or two, especially with Nicolas Batum working his way back.
- Hypothetical question: If fully healthy, could the Blazers have played Bayless, Rudy, Roy, Batum and Aldridge for stretches tonight and gotten away with it? Shouldn't we probably be rooting for that to happen at some point, if only for the sheer novelty?
- The last two Bucks on the court for pre-game shootaround were 7 footer Francisco Elson and 6'11" Dan Gadzuric, two bigs buried on a bench (they average 5 and 10 minutes respectively) who might stand to benefit from a change of scenery. Coincidentally, Kevin Pritchard, Tom Penn and Mike Born were sitting in courtside seats as the two centers went through a vigorous pregame workout, which included everything from pull-up jumpers to some light perimeter ball-handling. "Juwan Howard????", you can almost hear the players thinking, "I'm better than Juwan Howard!!!!"
- For you local hoops heads you surely remember Brandon Jennings facing off against Kyle Singler at the Les Schwab Invitational. Jennings played for Oak Hill and Singler was busy dominating at South Medford. As luck would have it, the Rose Garden jumbotron was showing Singler's Duke team laying the wood to Boston College as Jennings shot warmup jumpers under the tutelage of Bucks assistant Kelvin Sampson. It was an interesting artistic parallel between Jennings and Singler, who could not have traveled more divergent paths since their match-up at Liberty High 3 years ago.
- The scouting report is getting out on Jennings, who was punished mercilessly on defense, had trouble finding his stroke going 4-11 from the field and watched from the bench as his team play its best basketball during the fourth quarter. Let's be careful not to set current expectations too high though. Sure his pedestrian 12 and 7 in 29 minutes wasn't nearly as mercurial as some of his performances earlier this year but he's a rookie playing on a talent-deficient team. During warm-ups he displayed arguably the softest touch on a midrange jumper I've seen this year. His shot nestled into the net as if making itself comfortable. I overheard a member of the Bucks coaching staff describing a potential summer workout shooting plan to him and Jennings seemed more than receptive to the idea of spending hours a day fine-tuning his stroke. It's been a treat watching him transform his game from high school showman to NBA point guard. He's the kind of player you want to fast-forward five years just so you can see where he ends up. (I say that a lot, I know.)
- Steve Blake sure looked healthy again. Best stroke he's shown in months?
- Bayless minutes watch: 17 minutes total, 7 of them coming in the fourth quarter (garbage time). As I joked earlier today on twitter, if he gets bumped totally out of the rotation now that Rudy and Blake are back healthy, he should get Conan O'Brien to write a protest letter for him. I think Bayless has done enough over the last month to find a minimum of 10 minutes a night in McMillan's rotation. But when Batum comes back things will get even further squished. Time to step up.
- If you check out this picture taken by @rach_f_5 you'll see the lights are off at The Agency Sports Bar. The bar, where Talkin' Ball is taped, is shuttered indefinitely. Talkin' Ball taped tonight's show in the' Rose Garden but word is that the Blazers' studio might only be a temporary home for the Comcast-produced show. Hmm.
- Ilyasova is a beast.
- Bucks rookie Jodie Meeks went for a career high 21 points in 31 minutes off the bench. Here's his pre-draft workout report from back in June. No question he can shoot it. Showed some nice explosiveness off the bounce during pregame warmups and the first half, when he ran Jerryd Bayless around the court a little bit. Jodie Meeks = Chubby Bunny Von Wafer.
- Turns out Dante Cunningham really is learning a lot from wise old man Juwan Howard! 5 personal fouls in 4:55 of gameplay.
Nate McMillan's Post-Game Comments
What did you think of the offense tonight?
I thought it was good. I love our energy. I love what I saw with both groups tonight. Trying to slide Rudy back in the rotation. We looked at that in practice and they practiced that way yesterday. I thought they came out very aggressive. Blake, Bayless and Rudy and really went after the first group. And basically I told them that's how we want to play. I thought that first half we were really good. I thought throughout the game was really good. We started to get a little loose late in the ballgame when they started trapping us but I love our energy tonight.
Were you nervous when Milwaukee made the fourth quarter run?
I'm always nervous. We knew they were down 24 in the Phoenix game and they're going to play. That team plays hard and they play for 48 minutes. We knew that we were going to have to put them away. It was a very similar game to the game they played in Phoenix being down 24, they actually took a 2 point lead with that very trap, that was something that we had seen, we just didn't execute well, attack it when we had opportunities.
Were you upset you had to put LaMarcus back in for awhile to stop their late run?
Hey, whatever we have to do. That happens sometimes. We got control of the game and we won the game.
Pulling Roy was precautionary?
Yeah, his hamstring looked tight, tightening up. I got him out early, not early, about 3 minutes to go. He made a move or did something and felt it so we just took him out of the game.
Rudy seemed to play well despite not scoring
Oh yeah. He came in and I thought he fit right in. The flow was good. He knocked down his first shot. Spacing and having those 3 guards out there again, I just liked the movement that we saw and I thought defensively they did a nice job.
Was there a carry-over of energy from the two big opponents over the weekend?
Well, you know, we're starting to get some guys back. That game against Cleveland was a tough one. We dropped it. We try and put things like that behind us. And come out and play much better basketball. Tonight this is a team that just beat us a few weeks ago and we knew they played hard and we needed to play a good game and we did.
Did the earlier loss in Milwaukee provide motivation tonight?
It was still in their minds. It was just about 2 or 3 weeks ago and we felt like we had that game. Tonight, before we meet up with Orlando and go on the road we really needed to take care of business here.
Blake looking better
I thought he really pushed the ball tonight. The energy he came out with kind of setting that tempo for that second group and it was good to see him knock down some shots.
Andre and Brandon establishing themselves physically
I thought he did a really nice job. We felt like we could post their guards so we wanted to put their guards in the post with Brandon and Miller. I thought they did a good job in that first half of taking advantage of that, making their reads and if they didn't double team they scored, if they did they made good kickouts.
LaMarcus
I liked the way he played too. He did a nice job of establishing us in the post, rotating over, he had two blocked shots tonight. Some boards. Six assists. Just a well-rounded game. I thought he was solid the entire game.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
157 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not surprsied the Agency had issues
It wasn’t a great place honestly.
In other news, what is the real story with Roy, is he okay? I know he’s tough but really.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
whoops
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 6:40 AM PST up reply actions
The Agency..a "sports bar"..didn't even broadcast TALKING BALL WHILE it was being recorded
RIGHT THERE. Stupid move. I went there once after a Blazer game thinking I’d be able to see the show and all they had up there was the TALKING BALL logo. I asked about it and the server said “Oh..there’s something wrong with Comcast.” Well there was NOTHING wrong with Comcast. They just didn’t broadcast the show. It was recorded when I got home!!! LAME.
thats kinda dumb, i would imagine they would have gotten some business if they let people watch the taping
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions
Didn't they in fact routinely invite people to come there
on the air? Seems like I remember lots of “We’re here live at the Agency sports bar, come on down.”
thats what i thought and hence my confusion
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:49 AM PST up reply actions
Like the 5th Quarter used to be
At Tony Romas.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
More details on Roy's departure from the game.
"I’m concerned," admitted Roy, who was 7 of 10 from the field and 7 of 7 from the line and had four assists and three steals. "I don’t want have to miss two weeks of basketball. When I left the game tonight, I said, ‘Coach, this could be serious.’
"As long as I can play, I’ll keep trying. Hopefully Friday it doesn’t burn more. Early in a game it feels good, but as the game gets into the third or fourth quarter, it seems like it starts to fatigue a little bit."
Funny thing
He’s playing his best ball perhaps ever with it.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
i called for him to sit against Cleveland and tonight
which would have given him a full 6 days off between games, without likely affecting the outcome of either of them. It might become one of those situation where we either have to bite the bullet and give him some games off to get it right, or else he’ll be playing with it sore the rest of the year. If that’s the case, I say find a spot in the schedule where you think you can swing it, and just do it. Heck, at least it will delay the guard minutes problem a week or two, and maybe you can boost someone’s trade value to boot.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
He sat out the whole summer and it didn't get better
He might as well play through it
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
Especially now that Rudy and Blake are back.
Rudy looked like he could have gone 30 min. no problem. Bayless is dying for minutes. Blake was shooting well.
I thought Rudy was gassed in the fourth quarter
but I agree with you that we still could have accommodated a night off for Brandon. – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
hey guys thanks for reminding me about roy. he said he expects to play Friday and I assume we’ll find out any other details tomorrow. I added the following quote above…
Roy left the game near the end due to a hamstring injury. “Hamstring was pretty sore during the third quarter. I made a move going to the middle, I passed it and kind of grabbed it. I just told Coach if you can keep me out, please do… it got tight, I asked Coach could I go back in, the trainer said, ‘nah.’ I had came and iced it right after the third quarter, I had to put ice on there. Yeah I expect [to play Friday.]”
Rudy didn't look ready to take over for Brandon if he can't go.
Need Bayless to save us again.
"Oden is a man among cub scouts."
by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 14, 2010 12:36 AM PST up reply actions
I see three or four guys who can help make up for Roy's absence if there is one
I am not ready to admit the sky is falling (again)
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 6:41 AM PST up reply actions
True.
You only say it’s going to rain every day.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
i think the team is really good and i get frustrated when they do not play to the potential
yes i agree
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions
Don't know what to say.
I too think we have a very good team. One I expect to get better.
And I get frustrated when I see them lose a game I thought they should or could have won – which is almost every game they play.
But I don’t let my frustration last much beyond the end of the game. Once the game is over, the slate is wiped clean and tomorrow is a brand new day.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
I don't know if should be happy or sad about Nate finally posting Miller up on smaller PGs
It’s like he’s never seen Miller play in this league and slowly learning more about his game.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
Even my dumbass was calling for it weeks ago
shoulda been months truth be told…
RUDY > MJ
But, of course, if I could make a dunk on his face I would. - Rudy
:/
:/
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 6:41 AM PST up reply actions
that was one of the things we talked about this summer
following the Miller signing, that Andre and Brandon should be able to take turns abusing the small/quick PGs who usually give Portland fits with their penetration
FWIW, I suspect Patty Mills will have the same difficulty defending physical PGs that Jennings had, last night
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Hopefully
This win is the start of a beautiful home winning streak that will last the rest of the season.
Just a thought.
After Friday
The next home game is Blazersedge night (which I can’t attend unfortunately). Hmm..
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
I think he noticed.
Fernandez, on the standing ovation he received when he entered the game: "Incredible. I love the fans. It’s amazing. I appreciate their support. Awesome."
"Oden is a man among cub scouts."
by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST
Has anyone noticed how when Nate " praises Miller " he always inserts another player
Like he cant just come out and say that Miller played great and that they should have gone to him in the 4th against Memphis and won game by putting the ball in the veterans hands? Nate wants a point to live vicariously through and Miller is his polar opposite…neither have won anything but at least Miller still has a chance as a player if Nate would just let him play his game and be the silent veteran who closes games with leads in the 4th.
Nates treatment of the point guard position so far in his career is definitely open for ridicule...
RUDY > MJ
But, of course, if I could make a dunk on his face I would. - Rudy
And this is based on what?
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
common sense
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions
Well that's not comforting ...
… as there isn’t always much of that circulating around here.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Do we now refer to you as Dr Odenator the world renowned psychologist?
Or just Swami for your ability to read stuff into things?
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
someone pee in your cereal this morning? you sound like me only even more annoying and whiny
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions
I'm not much of a cereal eater.
Could be due to an unconcious effort to avoid what you refer to happening.
Too bad tone doesn’t come through. Because I wasn’t whining at all. Just curious how Odenator has gained such “insight” into McMillan.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
I agree with your sentiment timg56...
…and question the need to find something negative to “read into” something no matter the outcome of the game or the effort given.
All the usual suspects for ridicule or negativity did their jobs very well tonight yet people still find the need to manufacture things of which to be critical. Miller played great, Steve Blake did all the things his detractors have asked him to, LMA not only scored but blocked some shots, our previously questionable draft choice Jeff Pendergraph stood toe to toe with their bigs (and has consistently showed more then any of us “experts” could have predicted) and Nate had good rotations and gave Brandon the time off the floor everyone wanted.
I have to wonder why many of you still want to find something negative in this game??? I just don’t understand why when there is so much positive… some MUST complain!
Great effort and teamwork last night guys!!!…
GO BLAZERS!!!
by Ilikeemall on Jan 14, 2010 10:17 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I would be fine with Roy sitting the Magic and Wizz games.
by southern oregon on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 AM PST reply actions
At the very least
Sitting Roy against the Wiz would keep him out of any potential line-of-fire situations. Perhaps we ought to issue flak vests to our players for that game just in case the Wiz get the crazy/stupid on…
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
The Wiz need "flak-y vests"
There’s always lots of flaky flying around them.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Funny you mention ELSON. I spoke to him last summer when he was back in Holland and being a blazerfan i asked him about the team and he was really enthusiastic about em! And besides that he mentions all the time in dutch interviews he so wishes he’ll get a new club/chance as the current bucks coach doesn’t want him at all anymore..
GET that guy with the ring!
DNP-CD last night
If he is superfluous in Milwaukee, maybe he could get some time here in Portland. Waive him, Bucks! – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
With Rudy back, it's time to have Miller come off the bench
Start Bayless, Roy, Webster, LA, and Pendergraph or Howard then have Miller come in for Roy to rest his hammy and a few minutes later sub Rudy for Bayless.
I think Miller and Rudy could really do some damage together.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
Andre Miller has been playing much better as a starter...
…particularly at the start of games.
Rudy and Dre will have the chance to play together. I, for one, do not want any more shuffling of the starting lineup.
by HeathBlizzard on Jan 14, 2010 6:07 AM PST up reply actions
He wasn't great at the start of this one
but he put it together later, and the start of the third was really good.
#10 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
That's because he's the only Blazer that has to play himself into shape
It took him 1/4th a season to be useful.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
really? is that why half the team is on the shelf? i would hate to see them OUT OF shape
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:45 AM PST up reply actions
Over training
You can’t stay in peak shape 12 months a year. If you try, you end up injured. That’s the relationship between injured and out of shape. Now, if we didn’t have so many injured players, Blazers would have a lock on the play offs. I’ve heard the players on winning teams say the regular season is just pre season. The real season is the play offs. That’s when you have to be ready.
Yeah, just check out Roy's shooting % splits
and tell me that he wasn’t “playing himself into shape” to some degree also after he admittedly didn’t touch a basketball all summer.
October: .426
November: .457
December: .478
January: .600
I’m fine with it, I’m just sick of the blame for this being attributed entirely to Greg.
#52
People were upset that Roy "didn't touch a ball all season"
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
he was waiting to see if Nate was going to play him
Why get in shape if your just going to sit on the pines? The pay is the same, so get out and have some fun after the game. ( I can attest, getting in shape sucks) but being in shape and riding the pines must be depressing. Especially going into a preordained environment.
Mind over what really matters….
We may see a lot of shuffling ...
… as Nate trys to see which lineups work best against which opponent and give playing time to a number of deserving players.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
is that a compliment to Miller?
wow
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 6:43 AM PST up reply actions
Nope
LA looks great though.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
You have a knack for knowing where to stick the pin.
Nice work as always.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
great = wimpy
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:45 AM PST up reply actions
And Blake....
"Oden is a man among cub scouts."
by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 14, 2010 7:41 AM PST up reply actions
Would you get OFF of Miller's case? Did you SEE Milwaukee trapping both Blake and Bayless
when they went on their run and the Blazers were busy turning the ball over? That is UNTIL Miller came in and saved their butts. He was the only point guard who was able to get OUT OF THAT TRAP.
Why waste your time?
Some people have fun bashing Blake, he has fun bashing Miller.
Are you ever going to get off Blake’s case? Or Nate’s, for that matter?
Tom never, ever bashed any of the Blazers, not a single one, for at least 2-3 years, until the Blake/Nate hate went critical mass on Bedge. He then responded with Miller hate — and if Bedgers would drop the Blake and Nate bashing, he’d almost certainly drop the Miller bashing as well — it wouldn’t be fun for him anymore.
If you want him to stop, perhaps you might try stopping, yourself….
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Tom is hilarious!
I know he doesn’t hate Miller regardless of what he says, but he is so darn funny that I argue with him just to see how he will respond. Generally, his responses are brilliant. I didn’t know the Blake/Nate back story though. As usual, thanks for the info,
"Blake’s presence in Portland will never die, you do realize that. 100 years from now, his ghost will still be refusing to leave the court. Quick PGs will blow by the spectre, only to run into a real defender. They will swear Portland is running that six man play again, but on film, the sixth man will never appear. But occasionally, video replays will show the ball, all on its own, dribbling up court at great speed, with offensive players on the wing and few defenders back, only to pull up, back out, and look for Brandon. And the ball will be passed around, and suddenly, a pass will go to the corner, where there is no visible presence, only to have the ball suddenly stop as if caught, and launch towards the basket.
Video replays will be unable to determine whether the shooter’s feet were behind the three point line." - Jscot
jscot is wrong
Hate may not be a family value according to a t-shirt I saw this one multicultural man I saw at a the farmers market but Miller is lame, he’s not on Twitter, he doesn’t blog, he’s hiding something, and he’s “just trying to be professional”, as he complains about stuff to the media. Complaining to the media is not professional.
I’m trying to teach my do to growl at photos of Andre Miller.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:03 PM PST up reply actions
When asked if he wears boxers or briefs,
he said, “Neither.” Really!!! I saw it on the Jumbrotron at one of the games. If I a guy is going to release that kind of info directly to the Portland fan base, what could he possibly be hiding?
And jscot is NEVER wrong.
"Blake’s presence in Portland will never die, you do realize that. 100 years from now, his ghost will still be refusing to leave the court. Quick PGs will blow by the spectre, only to run into a real defender. They will swear Portland is running that six man play again, but on film, the sixth man will never appear. But occasionally, video replays will show the ball, all on its own, dribbling up court at great speed, with offensive players on the wing and few defenders back, only to pull up, back out, and look for Brandon. And the ball will be passed around, and suddenly, a pass will go to the corner, where there is no visible presence, only to have the ball suddenly stop as if caught, and launch towards the basket.
Video replays will be unable to determine whether the shooter’s feet were behind the three point line." - Jscot
by Sean M on Jan 14, 2010 12:29 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Panties
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Brilliant!
Good luck training your dog. I’m trying to find Kobe and LeBron puppets to give my German Shepard as chew toys.
"Blake’s presence in Portland will never die, you do realize that. 100 years from now, his ghost will still be refusing to leave the court. Quick PGs will blow by the spectre, only to run into a real defender. They will swear Portland is running that six man play again, but on film, the sixth man will never appear. But occasionally, video replays will show the ball, all on its own, dribbling up court at great speed, with offensive players on the wing and few defenders back, only to pull up, back out, and look for Brandon. And the ball will be passed around, and suddenly, a pass will go to the corner, where there is no visible presence, only to have the ball suddenly stop as if caught, and launch towards the basket.
Video replays will be unable to determine whether the shooter’s feet were behind the three point line." - jscot
asked if he wears boxers or briefs
I always answer “yes” to that question
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
It was pretty hilarious.
One of those get to know your Blazers segments during a timeout.
Facebook or Twitter – Neither
Mac or PC – Neither
Leno or Letterman – Neither
Boxers or Briefs – Big Smile – Neither
"Blake’s presence in Portland will never die, you do realize that. 100 years from now, his ghost will still be refusing to leave the court. Quick PGs will blow by the spectre, only to run into a real defender. They will swear Portland is running that six man play again, but on film, the sixth man will never appear. But occasionally, video replays will show the ball, all on its own, dribbling up court at great speed, with offensive players on the wing and few defenders back, only to pull up, back out, and look for Brandon. And the ball will be passed around, and suddenly, a pass will go to the corner, where there is no visible presence, only to have the ball suddenly stop as if caught, and launch towards the basket.
Video replays will be unable to determine whether the shooter’s feet were behind the three point line." - jscot
My hate for Miller goes to the bone
TO THE BONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 11:59 AM PST up reply actions
So you are saying you can't stand big band music ...
… or just that performed by Glen?
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
I don't bash Blake. I like Blake. He is an EXCELLENT 3 point shooter. He is GREAT
coming off of the bench. The only time I said anything about Blake or Nate was in reference to starting Blake and playing him many many minutes in place of Bayless or Miller. Also I did not like the way Nate handled the lineups; indecision and scheduled minutes for players. Also did not like his taking LA out with 2 fouls to sit an entire quarter. I agree with Sean.. I think Tom is funny and is probably just doing it to get a rise out of people.
You are wrong
Your only evidence that he hasn’t been here for 2-3 years is that he said so.
Everything you read on the Internet is true, especially if TiH said so.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
If Roy wasn't hurt, he could have done it too
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
So you ADMIT...Miller was able to do it. Good for you!
This is from" 40. No Mousse for Me: The View from Milwaukee
Observation 1: Okay, I’m takin’ names on the 4th Quarter disaster club, who let Milwaukee have a 16-3 run and who caused me and Mr. Snake to soil our armor: Blake, Fernandez, Bayless, Pendergraph, and a tag-team of LMA and Howard.
Observation 2: The bleeding was staunched when Andre Miller returned in the game.
Observation 3: The game was put away with a 7-0 Portland run with about 5 minutes to play in the final quarter. And here are the superheroes who were on the floor that interlude: LMA, Howard, Marty, Miller, and Blake."
I know Miller is good
I just don’t like him. He could score a triple-double and give me a kidney, all in the same day, and I’ll still think he’s a 똥구멍.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions
Andre Miller for Dan Gadzuric works straight up then Bayless could start
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yjl69dh
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
Gadzuric has a nasty contract. I would only have wanted him in a package with Sessions and/or RJ last year.
I’m more with dutchblazer. Elson is not amazing, but he could be a nice stopgap with experience who doesn’t make trouble if he doesn’t play for a game or so. Maybe the Bucks decide to buy him out, it seems a bit like the Blazers wait for something like that to happen with a big man they can afford.
Would you get OFF of Miller’s case? Did you SEE Milwaukee trapping both Blake and Bayless
when they went on their run and the Blazers were busy turning the ball over? That is UNTIL Miller came in and saved their butts. He was the only point guard who was able to get OUT OF THAT TRAP.
I offered to hate Batum or Rudy instead and no one took me up on it
I hope to stop hating Miller as a Blazer after February 18th.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
you have feb 18 marked down as the day you come to your senses, how cute
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions
trade deadline
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
dre's here to stay, it's tom that's gotta go :O
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions
I've been here for like a year and a half and I've done way dumber stuff than hate Miller
For the good of Blazersedge; I’d leave if you did.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions
Dang, you called me on it
I came in with Patty Mills. I loved him after watching him in the Olympics.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:52 PM PST up reply actions
the profile says...April 2008
TIH joined the Bedge-O-rama a few weeks before me. Back then we used to go back and forth on how Rudy was going come in to play all these minutes with Roy in the backcourt (Tom said “hell ya”, I said “not so fast, he defends like a Euro”)
I’m still patiently waiting for my chocolate Macadamian nuts
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
FYI, when SBN did a massive upgrade it affected the join date at the top of the profile
If someone was a Bedge member before the SBN rollover, the join date is listed at the top is wrong. You have to look a little lower on the page in the blog membership sections for the actual join date.
tominhawaii – since Jun 14, 2007
two4larue – since Jan 15, 2008
Dave – since May 18, 2006
so I'm coming up on an anniversary?
1-15 is also my wife’s birthday, so that shows how hard we partied back in ’08 if I was fiddling around on a new internet site
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
trading deadline
Either Blake or Miller have to be gone by then, don’t they? The Blazers can’t keep stuffing Bayless’ head back down in the sack and pulling the drawstrings
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Truly, why don't you concentrate on hating a player who is NOT a Blazer. For instance,
Zach Randolph.
Why bother hating someone I only see 4 nights a year?
I almost said 2 nights because he’s traded so much.
Proof that Miller is better than Blake: Miller is a 10 time non-all star and Blake is only a 6 time non-all star.
by tominhawaii on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
Well NOONE could hate Batum after listening to his voice. Go on youtube and listen to that voice.
Great timbre and that French accent..oooohhh lala!!!!
Not five minutes before I was going to watch the game on dvr, wife goes ' wow they are really blowing the Bucks out '
uh thanks honey.
sounds like a pretty throrough buttkicking though.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
how was lamarcus?
i see he had a solid stat line. was it one of those games where he gets his stats and has no noticeable impact on the game?
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 6:53 AM PST up reply actions
You'd better watch the game
He was the primary factor, IMO, in us blowing it out to 30+ in the third.
#10 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
cool, this i gotta see
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:48 AM PST up reply actions
It was the Aldridge/Miller show at the start of the third
Brandon hardly touched the ball until about 4-5 minutes in, and everything was going in.
LMA even had one play where he drove on that big Australian dude, INITIATED CONTACT, and drew the foul. I think he’s been watching Andre or Jerryd too much.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
i wasn't being sarcastic, i really want to see LMA play well :)
he’s my favorite blazer, someday when his little guys finally drop, we’ll see why
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions
He's your favorite?
Like Miller is Tom’s favorite! – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
Aldridge
Didn’t see the game, but listened to the radio. I would not characterize his performance as a “Z -Bo” stat line. Sounds like he was seeing the floor real well: reading the double teams and shooting when necessary. We will see if the trend continues on Friday.
The short one says to the tall one, "If I were you, I'd be tall."
The tall one replies, "No, if you were me, I'd be short."
I'd be curious to see the last time Randolph had 6 assists.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
November
but then given that this is also the only time LA’s had more than 5 assists all year, people that live in glass houses and all.
#52
pwnt
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:48 AM PST up reply actions
You can't argue about Bayless' lack of minutes
when Blake is draining 3s at a 60% clip. That’s all I’m sayin’.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
Meh, it was a blowout anyways
if Milwaukee hadn’t have gone on a run at the start of the 4th, I’d guess Blake and Bayless would have played out the entire quarter more or less. The run seemed to just prompt Nate to put Miller and Webster back in to slow things and down and make absolutely sure we didn’t completely collapse. Just hard to read into minutes of a game like this, especially with Roy out for the 4th.
#52
The problem is
that you never know when a 3 point shooter is going to go cold. And the other problem is that while Blake may hit from the perimeter, he can’t guard anybody. I hate the trend that is already starting that Blake is going back to playing more than Bayless, even though Bayless has more upside.
Completely agree. Bayless is probably stressed over this situation as well. Hopefully
Blake will be traded. I like Blake but like Bayless better.
Blake could be traded
then be coming right back to Portland after his new team releases him to save $
Nate/coaches/Roy are very high on Steve, most Bedgers are not
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Why would he be stressed?
He is one a very select, very limited group of people who get to play in the NBA. This out of literally millions of guys who play basketball with that goal in mind. He has a guarenteed salary for three years worth a few million and an almost certain probability of having it extended at least another two years, if not more.
All Bayless has to worry about is getting better and becoming more consistent. That’s nothing to stress over. I’m betting he’s having the time of his life. The only thing that could make it better is more minutes on the court and he knows what it takes to make that happen.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Well many here will argue that it is not saying much ...
… Blake is easily the best defender at the point Portland has (with a possible exception going to Nic).
Whenever I see comments trashing his defense, I’m fairly certain I am listening to a person that is repeating what he hears, rather than providing insightful analysis. There are few Blazers on the team, regardless of position, that are better at fighting through a screen rather than dropping below it. And if you watch, Blake is very good at palying within the rules and not grabbing his opponent. If anything I’d say this puts him at a disadvantage.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
thats true, but this is not the norm
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2010 9:49 AM PST up reply actions
I can, and I will.
Bayless scored 12 in 18 minutes.
Blake 11 in 28 minutes.
Look at the season stats. Bayless has been consistently more productive and more efficient.
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions
Bayless also had 2 assists to 3 turnovers
while Blake 4 assists and 0 turnovers… not to mention Blake’s 5 rebounds.
There are other factors that come into play besides how quickly a player can score.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
Cherry pick much?
Bayless has a much lower TOV% for the season than Blake: 11.4 to 16.0.
Bayless was playing the “Portland” and standing in the corner. He is not going to ring up dimes without the ball in his hands.
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions
No, he's right this time
Blake was playing his usual “It’s the Bucks, therefore I’m going to kill them” performance. He was actually attacking on offense in the first half, driving into the lane and dishing assists. He had three assists and a three in his first 4-5 minutes, and was a big factor in helping widen the lead in the first. He earned his minutes tonight.
Jerryd played well, too.
The only thing that disappointed me was that, when Andre came back in to break the press, Blake stayed on instead of Jerryd. I knew why, because we needed to take care of the ball and Blake is steady. But that was Nate’s old caution coming out again — the best way to handle the press is when you break it, attack and make them pay for it, and Jerryd is the guy to do that.
Of course, when he did that, he had mixed results, drawing a foul once, and committing a charge once. But I would have rather had Bayless stay out there and get experience in that situation — Andre was going to hold it together, and we weren’t going to lose that game.
But Blake had his best first half of the season, IMO. He’s had games where he knocked down more threes, but he was attacking like a PG in that first quarter, with some nice assists, and almost no mistakes. I would generally like to see Steve getting 15 mpg or so, but when he comes out and plays like that as soon as he comes in, you’d have to give him more.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
I don't disagree about last night. My comment was about the season in general.
Let me pull an AK (odd that I miss arguing with the kid) and quote a comment I made in Dave’s Game summary thread:
Blake got 28 minutes in his second game back. Can’t complain too much cause Blake was productive, but why does Blake get 28? Rudy got the max at 15, and Bayless who has played well for the last three games gets 18.
My expectation is that Bayless will be lucky to get 10-12 minutes once Blake, Rudy and Nic are back. It makes no sense to me. I think you can argue about whether the team is better with Blake or Bayless on the floor. I think Bayless brings more to the table; he puts pressure on the opponents defense; he can get to the line; he puts more pressure on the ball. But if Steve is dropping threes, I can see how that opens things up, so I think it is arguable on both sides.
What I don’t think is arguable is that Bayless is far more important to the team’s future. In my mind, it is coaching malpractice if Bayless isn’t getting 20 minutes a night. He needs to develop now rather than next year when the stakes are going to be much higher.
I agree about Blake being very good last night. I too was reminded of last year. If Roy, Miller, Bayless, Blake and Rudy (assuming he finds his shot quickly) are all firing on all cylinders, we are simply going to overwhelm a lot of teams with our backcourt. Like I said I think it is arguable about which combination is most productive in which situation. Blake is my least favorite of the five, but there is no doubt that he can make a big difference when he is being aggressive and hitting from distance. I just think Bayless is going to be far more important to the teams ability to compete for a championship and that he should take priority in terms of getting minutes in the rotation.
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 1:11 PM PST up reply actions
It's hard to imagine a scenario
where Bayless beats Blake out for minutes while Nate is the coach. Portland’s coaches are hyper risk-averse and Steve is the poster child for A/TO efficiency
If Miller is dealt next month, who doesn’t think Blake would be back in the starting lineup on Feb 19 and then extended this summer for the 2011 season and beyond?
Anyone?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Why did Jarrett Jack
beat Blake out for close of game minutes in 07-08? Nate’s risk aversion didn’t kick in then.
Bayless will beat Blake out next year if both are here.
Nate is risk-averse, but not to the point that a lot of people seem to think.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
I'd argue they've been equally as efficient:
True Shooting %
Blake: 53.6%
Bayless: 53.6%
effective Shooting %
Blake 52.3%
Bayless: 43.7%
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
Player Efficiency Rating
Bayless: 15.2
Blake: 10.1
This is a huge difference, Blake has played almost twice as many minutes (1043 to 577) while Bayless has scored slightly more points 290 to 270. Bayless’ per minute production completely blows Blake away.
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
Another quote. This time from bustabucket.com
The only bad came for Portland in the fourth quarter. With the game nearly out of reach, Milwaukee began to press Jerryd Bayless and Steve Blake with much success. Bayless seemed confused and disoriented by this tactic and it led to the minor meltdown in that final period. Fortunately, Nate had enough and put Andre Miller back in. Miller broke the double team every time, found the open man, and eventually put the game back out of reach. Miller proved once again his worth to the team last night, he is fitting in nicely. Naysayers need to pay attention to Andre, he’s quietly doing everything right.
The Ugly
Woah, look at this gem. a 2 for 1 in this department! Really though, from my vantage point last night, Andrew Bogut is HUGE. He looks like the giant from Princess Bride compared to the rest of the players on both teams. Fortunately Portland held him in check tonight.
Add comment (1) minhawaii in particular:
Hypothetical question: If fully healthy, could the Blazers have played Bayless, Rudy, Roy, Batum and Aldridge
Why would Nate have to wait until Nic comes back to play this kind of small lineup, seeing as how Martell would be a better choice to defend opposing PFs, anyway?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I disagree.
Martell is shorter with a lesser wingspan. He’s beefier, though, but not by too much.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
At the combine, he was measured at roughly 6'7"
in shoes with a 6’11" wingspan. Differences in their height are pretty negligible, and most guys tend to grow a little between 19 and 21. Nic has a longer wingspan, but it’s not like we’re talking Rajon Rondo vs. Jerryd Bayless here.
It really depends on who we’re talking about guarding, though. On a large majority 4s, I’d rather have Martell for the strength issues. He’s shown himself to be good at boxing out and keeping guys off the boards. For the finesse guys who play a little more outside, like Dirk or Jamison, I’d rather have Nic there to bother their shots and force them out of their comfort zone to miz it up down low, but I’m less confident in his ability to keep bigger guys off the boards.
#52
Yeah, agreed.
I’d argue that Batum is still growing in height, though, having just turned 21.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
Oh, of course
Nic just didn’t have combine measurements that I could find, so I pulled his from BB-R. Webster did (used for the wingspan), and I just trust those more than the listed ones at other sites.
#52
For the finesse guys who play a little more outside, like Dirk or Jamison, I’d rather have Nic there to bother their shots and force them out of their comfort zone to miz it up down low, but I’m less confident in his ability to keep bigger guys off the boards.
Problem is, Nic is also Portland’s best perimeter defender against SFs, SGs, and PGs…he can’t guard ’em all. Artest repeatedly bowled Batum over last April, I like #88 defending in space, not denying low post position
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
It's all about matchups
Martell is a good perimeter defender, too.
I’d rather have Nic’s length against guys like Dirk.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Don't forget about Martell's head
It’s as hard as a rock and can be/is used like a battering ram. I think he leads the league in head-knocking collisions, and has taken out a few teammates as well.
I look forward to small ball.
I think Nate needs to do a fair amount of experimenting to find the right combinations. We have five good guards. Four of whom should be good at playing fast (sorry Steve), two SFs who are fast and athletic, and a 6’11" gazelle who can outrun almost any center in the league.
This is going to be a real test for Roy and Nate. Are they willing to step outside their comfort zone and do what is best for the team?
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
Nate's already played 4 guards together out of necessity
I don’t remember which game, but I remember commenting that he was tyring to outdo Don Nelson
I liked what I saw re: tempo in the L*ker game, so maybe Nate/Roy are starting to come around. I still don’t like the fast and loose style for the playoffs, but unless KP trades away a few guards for another big man, Nate doesn’t have much of a choice but to keep pushing it
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Seems to me the NBA game is all about mismatches
If we are going to be small and get pounded in the paint, we need to take advantage of our mismatches at the other end. We have the PG, Miller (and potentially Bayless and even Mills), who knows how to run. We have wings who can fly. We have one of the fastest big men in the league. Seems obvious to me that we should pick up the pace.
Besides, teaching the team how to run in certain situations, after being very deliberate for years, should put another attack arrow in the teams quiver for the future. A steady diet of running is rarely successful in the playoffs, but used as a situational weapon against particular teams (large, slow, or old) it would be a great weapon to force teams out of their comfort zone.
by upper left corner on Jan 15, 2010 6:27 AM PST up reply actions
the Roy factor
in the playoffs Brandon is going to be playing 40 mpg, that leaves around 8 minutes for Nate to play a “quick” unit to increase the pace. I think the hesitation to run stems more from #7 than it does from the sidelines, even Roy’s college coach (Romar) was unsuccessful in motivating Brandon to up his tempo
The other thing is, running the fast break has to be stressed from training camp and enforced throughout the season. It’s not a switch that can be flicked on and off. The teams that do it well practice at pace and don’t slow things down, because of the opponent/matchups, etc. Portland’s style is centered around Roy, for better or worse, and when Oden returns there will be another big dis-incentive to run amok
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
The Blazers drafting philosophy
Why does KP draft players that need to run to be successful, like Sergio and Patty Mills? (or sign a FA PG like MIller?) I’m sure he knows the team’s style and identity are going to be wrapped around Roy and Oden for years to come. It’s like he’s constructing a roster that maintains a “tension” between players that do well in the halfcourt and others who are better off running. I’d like to think this will all work out for the best…but usually teams that are successful (eg, the Spurs) stick with a style and don’t add players to the mix whose strengths are in other areas
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Oh gee I don't know, how about another big guy? Might come in handy...
The point is, you’ve got Roy who plays slow, and Oden who (when healthy) should be a dominant post player for years…so why draft whippets and water bugs? To maybe play 5 minutes a game as a change of pace? Seems like schizophrenic roster construction to me. Pick a style, and draft players that fit that style, don’t try to build half a fast team and half a slow team and keep the players guessing what pace they’re going to be playing from quarter to quarter
Play your game well and make the other guy match up to you
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
That's what I was thinking Two4larue
Try it with Webster and see if you like it. I think I might like it, if Webster was matched up with Mbah a Moute for example. – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
Portland's four guards (excluding Rudy who was rusty) scored 64 points on 34 shots.
All four guys in double figures. When the shots are falling and the whistles are tweeting, our back-court is pretty darn impressive.
Nate is likely to make me crazy with his ongoing Blake love, but there is no denying that we are loaded in the back-court.
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2010 11:07 AM PST reply actions
Funny observation from a Clippers fan.
I sat next to a 20ish kid from L.A. last night, a diehard Clippers fan who hates the L*kers. As it was a blowout, we chatted most of the game. He’s pretty up-to-date on the Blazers’ situation. However, after a nifty move leading to a bucket by Blazers #6, he said, “Whose that guy. He having a pretty good game.” I said, “That’s Juwan Howard. With Oden and Joel out, he is our starting center.” To which he replied, “Juwan Howard! Can’t be, man. He retired, and he sucks!”
Another solid game from The Ageless ’Wan. Little Mr. Clippers fan and his Ed Hardy shirt were impressed.
Blake’s presence in Portland will never die, you do realize that. 100 years from now, his ghost will still be refusing to leave the court. Quick PGs will blow by the spectre, only to run into a real defender. They will swear Portland is running that six man play again, but on film, the sixth man will never appear. But occasionally, video replays will show the ball, all on its own, dribbling up court at great speed, with offensive players on the wing and few defenders back, only to pull up, back out, and look for Brandon. And the ball will be passed around, and suddenly, a pass will go to the corner, where there is no visible presence, only to have the ball suddenly stop as if caught, and launch towards the basket.
Video replays will be unable to determine whether the shooter’s feet were behind the three point line. - Jscot

by 




















