Game 40 Preview: Bucks vs. Blazers
Game Time: 7:00 p.m. Pacific TV: Comcast
A couple of significant things have happened to the Bucks since they squeaked out a 108-101 overtime win against Portland a month ago. First, they've lost shooter Michael Redd for the season with torn ligaments in his left knee. Redd played 29 minutes in the last meeting between the teams, scoring 11. Aside from a few old-school outings he's been struggling all year. But Milwaukee has usually won when he's performed well. The second significant development is that the Bucks have lost a ton of games. They are 4-9 since their thrilling victory, those wins coming against Indiana and the Nets on the road, Chicago and Oklahoma City at home. That's not exactly Murderer's Row. To be fair they've played a number of tough teams in their losses. But things aren't clicking for them now.
Part of the reason the Bucks are having trouble is you never know what they're going to score on a given night. They've posted multiple games in the 70's and 80's in addition to a few 100+ efforts. They don't have imposing scorers, nor is any player in a major rotation spot shooting a good percentage outside of Luke Ridnour. They do take a bucketful of three pointers every game and have several players proficient from that range. The strategy goes a long way towards explaining why their offensive performance is inconsistent, however. They love to offensive rebound and to generate more shots than the opponent.
Rookie Brandon Jennings and former #1 overall pick Andrew Bogut key the attack for Milwaukee. Jennings takes 5 three-pointers per game and shoots almost 40% on them. He's less successful inside the arc unless he can drive past you to the rim, in which case he can be devastating. Bogut has range and prefers to put up the ball over you rather than bang inside and score at the rim. Beyond that they have a serviceable, if somewhat mundane, talent pool including Ridnour, energy and rebounding forward Ersan Ilyasova, former Memphis post-forward Hakim Warrick, and a bunch of veterans to fill out the roster. Almost every Milwaukee player performs well when they're in their comfort zone. Warrick scores when close to the rim, Ridnour hits the jumper, shooting guard Charlie Bell has deep range, and so on. The problem is that the comfort zones are too small for most and none of them outside of the two best guys has game-changing talent, even on a good night.
Milwaukee doesn't turn over the ball much but they do forced turnovers from you. Their defense is more opportunistic than solid, however. As long as you keep the rock you can exploit many of their individuals even thought their defensive team effort this year is decent. The Bucks do commit a ton of fouls, a major Achilles Heel.
Keys to the Game
1. You have to remember that Milwaukee's offense relies on halfcourt play and jump shots. They're not going to run. They're not going to attack or score in the low post. They want to move the ball to an open man and get a clean look on the "J". This means unless somebody really starts going off on you like they were LeBron you don't need to double or give help. Just stick with your man, harry the passing lanes, and get a hand in the face when someone rises to shoot.
2. Keep them off of the offensive boards. It's a team effort on Portland's part.
3. The Blazers need to go hard against the Bucks backcourt and make them defend. Put pressure on guys like Jennings and Ridnour to stop you. You'll probably be successful and it'll keep their minds off of the offensive game.
4. LaMarcus Aldridge went crazy on the Bucks the last time these two teams met. Wouldn't hurt to see that again...
Final Thoughts
Somebody asked me yesterday if I thought the Blazers would make the playoffs. I think they still will, though not in a high seed. But in order to do so they have to realize that a bunch of teams are behind them right now who could very well surge later in the season, Utah included. Sitting in 6th place Portland doesn't have much ground to lose. The key to not losing that ground is less spectacular wins and more not losing games you shouldn't. Tonight's game probably qualifies. If you want it, nights like this are when you show it.
Check out the Milwaukee P.O.V. at BrewHoop.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Run plays at and around Bogut;
Andre, Roy and Bayless can all force fouls.
Does anybody play that game ‘Get their Big Guy in Foul Trouble’ anymore?
That was like a poem
It was beautiful, man.
#52 by Mortimer on Dec 17, 2009 10:35 PM PST
Nate plays the "pull Bayless out because walking the ball up is better" game.
by BRoyInThe4th on Jan 13, 2010 1:00 AM PST up reply actions
Nice to get the obligatory
(and gratuitous) Nate bashing comment over and done with early in the thread.
#5 #10 #52 #88
BRoy's comment is
sort of like a man referring to his own wife as, “The old ball and chain.” It ain’t likely to get much better!
#52
While everyone else
is doing the, “Oh honey, you look great tonight” line hoping to see something different when it always stays the same. “I hope Rudy and Bayless get regular playing time. I hope they run tonight. I hope LA pounds the rock inside.”
When all the while, it’s the same dress, the same haircut, and the same Steve Blake getting more minutes than anyone else.
by Sarcastic_Twit on Jan 13, 2010 6:45 AM PST up reply actions
What?
When all the while, it’s the same dress, the same haircut, and the same Steve Blake getting more minutes than anyone else.
That is a lot like calling a Chameleon plain. We don’t even know who is going to be playing in the fourth quarter tonight.
#52
laugh out loud
I read a post saying Nate wasn’t a good coach because Bayless wouldn’t be getting minutes if everyone was healthy.
Clearly Nate should hire Tonya Harding.
That way he can keep the playing time issue to a minimum.
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 13, 2010 10:07 AM PST up reply actions
I say fire Nate if a green substitute for fossil fuels isn't implemented worldwide by the end of the regular NBA season.
by tominhawaii on Jan 13, 2010 10:54 AM PST up reply actions
I say fire Nate if EVERYBODY isn't happy!
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 13, 2010 11:39 AM PST up reply actions
If he makes EVERYBODY happy,
then I’m not happy. Anyone with that much power should be fired.
πεντήκοντα δύο
At a minimum, he would be doing something illegal ; > )
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 13, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions
No, that would be too quick and easy on him,
once he heals up, make him practice taking charges from the team every day! Also have at least one Nate hater sit on the bench next to him at games. Then as a capper, extend his contract, with no escape clause, for at least five more years. It would be a slow painful end, much better for us all than any of these, “quick fixes.”
#52
Time for Lamarcus to start earning his contract. Start battling in the post and stop the mid range jump shot.
Amen
Let’s play rough enough that we actually NEED the mouthguard!
Will somebody please go sacrifice a chicken at the Rose Garden to appease the injury gods?
LA is still being paid according to his his rookie contract this year.
I guess a lot of people can’t wait to throw his new contract in his face—as if that is going to do any good.
#52
the flip side, that LMA shouldn't have to do anything this year because his bump doesn't kick in til next season
is a bad argument imo
but i agree with your point that you can’t get too pissed at LMA because frankly for 5 mil or w/e this season he’s not that bad
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions
im still going to bash him nonstop tho
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions
unpossible
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions
LMA has a provision is his new contract
that any criticism of his being overpaid cannot start until he is at least two years into the deal. A lot of the new contracts, including Hedo’s, are including these kinds of provisions now.
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 13, 2010 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
o.O
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2010 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
Rumors have been swirling around today....
….that we might see Rudy back tonight.
Probably not for long, but that’s a relief of some sorts!
Blazers win!
by The X-man on Jan 13, 2010 1:05 AM PST via mobile reply actions
BrewHoop? BrewHoop? Com 'on!
Wisconsin is a great place! I lived there for five years and liked it. But M’waukee (as locals pronounce it) is NOT the center of the brewing world anymore. I know .. they have Miller (the beer – not Andre) and Old Milwaukee and others. But these are watered down mega corporate clones without distinctive personality or character. I drank all their beers when I was a poor student who couldn’t afford any better.
We all know that if anyplace is Beervana, it’s PDX. I know I’m being harsh and judgmental about M’waukee beers, but if anything is worth being passionate about, it’s beer as well as basketball.
- :) jayfisher
No need to play Rudy too much
Last thing we want is a re-injury or a new injury from going too hard when not in condition. We’ve got time to bring him along gradually.
Same with Blake.
#5 #10 #52 #88
I want to see a lot more of the Rudy/Bayless back-court.
Penetration, passing, speed, aggressiveness, steals, shooting, and Oooops = fun to watch.
#52
Beer Bashing, and the basketball game
Bucks fan here. I run my own bucks blog as well, but I just had a few things to say…
1. Thanks to many of you for your well wishes after Redd went down on the Brew Hoop page. You guys are a classy bunch.
2. Jayfischer, It’s called Brew Hoop, because we are beer. It’s not just that we make beer, lots of it. tons of it. It’s not just about MKE either, its about the whole state. We’ve got beer, we drink beer, and we love beer. My Bucks blog has a portion dedicated to beer. We’ve got the production, history, museums, attractions and Drunk driving laws to prove it. in 2009 one of our state senators got 3 DUI’s, not bragging, just saying.
3. Your post is a pretty accurate description of what Our Bucks are going through. When everything comes together, and the drivers are driving, the shooters are shooting and jennings is orchestrating the whole thing, this team is deadly, but it so rarely comes together.
by Take Back Our Bucks on Jan 13, 2010 6:53 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
if you come to the Rose City...
many of us would buy you a beer. A real one.
Funny response by the way.
RoadBlazer
its always nice to hear from other team's fans, especially when they are cool
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2010 10:10 AM PST up reply actions
in 2009 one of our state senators got 3 DUI’s, not bragging, just saying.
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
Wow! Shades of Packwood's wine boxes!
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
overall oregon is better for beer.
but new glarus still trumps anything i’ve ever drank from this state.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Jan 13, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions
Wisconsin is where I learned to like beer: Oregon is where I learned to love beer.
What’s your blog? You should add the web address to your profile:-)
I love this key
1. You have to remember that Milwaukee‘s Portland’s offense relies on halfcourt play and jump shots. They’re not going to run. They’re not going to attack or score in the low post. They want to move the ball to an open man and get a clean look on the “J”. This means unless somebody really starts going off on you like they were LeBron you don’t need to double or give help. Just stick with your man, harry the passing lanes, and get a hand in the face when someone rises to shoot
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
I know the D league aint' exactly the NBA...
but isn’t the 3 point line the same distance in both leagues? Patty Mills shot the lights out in 2 games in the D league. One could argue the only thing Blake does well is shoot the 3. Call me crazy, but why not give Blake’s minutes to Mills? Lets see what he can do. I like Steve, but he is dead weight. Interesting to see how many minutes Blake gets tonight, I don’t see how anybody in their right mind would play him in front of any of the other guards.
I still want to see Rudy play the point. He would have a tough time with speedsters like Jennings or Brooks, but he has great court vision and passing ability. Now if only he could shoot the 3…
If his D league games are any indicator
Mills is a horrible liability on defense right now.
I don’t get the Mills love around here. Sure, he has a lot of potential. But he fell all the way to 55 in the draft. That means all the other GMs didn’t think he was a likely rotation player. We wanted him to go to Europe, meaning we drafted him as a long-term project. He comes off of injury and has two hot-shooting D league games and everyone wants to anoint him.
He’s still a long-term project who may never pan out. He’s played five minutes in the league, and looked out of place doing so.
#5 #10 #52 #88
I like Mills also, but I think this says it all about lil's evaluation:
I like Steve, but he is dead weight.
Maybe Steve has the plague or something?? It does not matter who Blakes competition is, there is always going to be a better player behind him (wink, wink).
#52
by KINGofMACct on Jan 13, 2010 10:33 AM PST up reply actions
You are reminding me of the guys who had Bayless "all figured out" last year.
before he got more playing time. I would like to see more before deciding on Patty.
And, yeah, I prefer to hope for the best. It’s more fun for me that way.
"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener
Not like those guys at all
Those guys wrote off Bayless. I don’t write off Mills at all — like I said, he has a lot of potential.
But he’s just not ready to be a contributor on a playoff-level NBA team. And it isn’t based only on what I saw when I watched those two D-League games or his five minutes of glory with the Blazers, it is also based on the evaluation of 30 GMs who let him fall to 55 in the draft, and the evaluation of our team that they wanted him to go to Europe, and have sent him back to Idaho again.
The guy may turn out to have been a steal at 55, but he’s a long-range project who just isn’t ready to take minutes from the guys we have right now.
Even if someone hates Blake’s play, Mills is so far behind Jerryd and Andre that he couldn’t get minutes when Blake was out.
#10 #25 #52 #88 -- #5 is back!
Bayless and Jennings
were one SAT test away from being back-court running mates at the University of Arizona. If you ponder that duo reeking havoc on Pac-10 guards for long enough at some point you’ll start to glimpse a bend in the space-time continuum.
Jordan Hill would be their big man, right?
RexRoy should be played more.
"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew
I dunno bout his game status but in general he is at PimpStatus.
by tevisthe4th on Jan 13, 2010 4:20 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
you just wish you were him . . .
Oh, I did give into temptation just for the sake of being difficult . . . .
"I never give in to the temptation to be difficult just for the sake of being difficult. That would be too ridiculous"
Jacques Derrida
Anyone want to wager on how many minutes Bayless gets tonight?
With Nate’s pet Steve back and Rudy taking 10-15 minutes, I doubt Bayless gets more than 12 minutes.
It hasn’t even happened yet and I am already irked. Come on Nate get the rotation right: send Steve out for pizza.
by upper left corner on Jan 13, 2010 4:08 PM PST reply actions
La Chispa(The Spark)
comes back tonight,baby I can feel the twine burning now.
by DowntownVinnie on Jan 13, 2010 4:40 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
If Jennings shows up.
It’ll be that more apparent as to why you want Mills back on the Roster and getting some run at PG. Rare speedsters like those two benefit big when it comes to how the NBA game is ref’d.
Plus, I’m betting Mills will prove that he has better court vision than Blake or JB.
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.

by 





















