Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Amateurs vs. Professionals

Being interviewed as part of someone's undergrad project the other day I got asked an interesting question.  "What difference, if any, do you think your work makes to the sport you cover?"

Yikes.

It seems simple on the surface but that question is right up there in complexity with "Did you know you were going that fast, sir?" and "Honey, does this dress make me look fat?"  I mean, what?  You make absolutely no difference to anyone, anywhere and things would be entirely the same if you never existed?  That's depressing.  On the other hand claiming every thought you have heralds a New Renaissance for professional basketball seems...presumptuous.  Unless, of course, you're AK1984.  Then it's true.

But it did get me to thinking...what difference do we make?  I don't mean just "we" as in Ben and I.  I mean all of us doing this thing.  There's the obvious...keeping people focused on the team and at least mildly entertained.  Those are both positive things.  Is there any other reason for existence?  Could our ideas, discussions, fights, and flights of fancy actually affect the game itself in some way?

If you're talking about having the same kind of effect or production as a professional in the trade the answer is pretty much no.  The gulf between even the most learned of us and a professional scout or GM is vast.  Part of it is lingo and being acclimatized to the league but there's a huge knowledge gap as well.  I can see some of the things scouts are seeing when they point them out to me but I can only come up with a half-dozen on a good day without their prompting.  They come up with a hundred from the same stimulus.  6% on your best day isn't an F, it isn't even a grade.  It's not a "try harder", it's a "you're not even in the right class, Bub".

On the other hand analysis of the sport is evolving in a way that grants more access to the layperson.  We've certainly seen statisticians making inroads into the establishment in recent years.  We've also seen at least one former sportswriter become a General Manager, though how well that's going to work out is up in the air.  In the first case the people in question cultivated specialized skills valued by their organizations.  In the second case, I assume, the sportswriter evolved beyond coverage and became a true initiate.  Either way, there are more opportunities today for Joe Average to make a difference than ever before.

I compare the situation to another field of interest:  astronomy.  Professional astronomers are still doing the vast majority of the significant work.  Most amateurs don't have the true math or science background to produce professionally.  The gulf is vast there as well and no amount of glossy magazine perusal will bridge it.  However amateur astronomers have made enormous strides in the observational field.  As it turns out professional astronomers competing for limited time on mammoth observatory telescopes can delve quite deeply into a single project but they can't compete with the casual observation power of thousands of folks in their backyards keeping careful data.  As such amateurs have begun to discover supernovae, chart variable stars, engage in spectroscopic studies, even help in the search for extrasolar planets.  A group of careful amateurs, linked together and being meticulous, can be of great aid to professionals, extending their reach beyond its traditional confines.  It's to the point where professionals are starting to link up with amateur groups, directing and benefitting from their studies.

I don't guess it's beyond the realm of possibility that a group of amateur basketball observers could make a difference like that.  Nobody's going to have the calculus to ensure the correctness of the next draft pick the way that KP and his staff do.  But a weird synergy gets created in the process of tossing around ideas, observations, and theories about the game.  Some of those could be considered eye-opening.  In certain ways hundreds of thousands of eyes can be more beneficial than just two.  In those particular ways...yeah, I suppose a meticulous, reasoned, data-fertile site could also be beneficial.

I didn't answer the guy's question that way, of course. But it's food for thought.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think the contribution is significant

I have many friends that read this blog almost exclusively for their Blazer material. I believe the coverage here has forced O-Live to take it further and further, including all material from the paper and the Behind the Lockerroom door type series. Without Blazersedge this doesn’t happen. It is the large community here that gives Portland a chance against the larger markets in the internet forums, polls, etc. Dave, you bring the class and humor( odd combo,) which we all appreciate and attempt to replicate when we join the larger NBA interwebs community. Go Blazers. Blazersedge for life!

by The Natural ala Mode on Sep 21, 2009 1:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Definitely a difference

BE is by far my #1 go-to source for anything Blazers-related. You and Ben consistently write insightful commentary and I love the whole community of people who post here. I’ve been a Blazer fan my entire life and yet when I started reading this site I realized how much there is about basketball that I had never thought about before.

I’m not just saying that either. I mean it.

by shighkin on Sep 21, 2009 1:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Are you having some kind of writer's meltdown?

Because if so, stop it.

I was a writer. A good one. I was in a grad school going for an MFA, had a book mostly written, was starting to get a following on an up and coming website and hits from journals and then I started asking myself those sorts of questions and developed a full blown case of writers block.

I dropped out of grad school and haven’t been able to write a satisfying piece since. That was 4 years ago.

So here is my solution. I suggest you mix yourself a drink, grab a hammer and ask yourself that question in your mind. At the exact moment you finish the question in your mind you need to smash one of your favorite fingers with the hammer. It may sound extreme but if you can associate those mind-numbing, existential death questions with finger-crushing pain you might be able to block them out altogether.

It’s for the best.

Oh and go slap that undergrad student. Precocious little twit…

"No disrespect to Jeff Blake"

by Eat Politicians on Sep 21, 2009 1:57 AM PDT reply actions  

No meltdown

No block either. Just relishing my last few days to write about whatever comes to mind before the season’s grind starts.

But I like your hammer idea. Can I use Ben’s hand instead?

—Dave

by Dave on Sep 21, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good

I have no desire to scour around the sewers of the interwebs in search of another connection for my hideous blazers addiction…

"No disrespect to Jeff Blake"

by Eat Politicians on Sep 21, 2009 2:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

The contribution includes the education of the fans to become more knowledgeable and more connected

That in turn raises the community interest and serves the purpose of driving up demand for that same information. Which goes a long way toward generating the income needed to maintaining the team in Portland.

Blazersedge provides some of the best reporting available anywhere. Because we are not limited to the space or time that the media must be we can more fully explore issues and collect far more knowledgeable synergy around those issues. I have never felt more connected to the team than through this site. You are making a difference in my life. I don’t need to read the daily O anymore. They get some scoops but it is all explained better here. In addition I believe we have made a difference in national perspective towards the Blazers. Other Internet sites (including Dime and True Hoop) make reference to your articles and quote them extensively.

Do I think we change the game? No. But we are part of a cultural upheaval in the world based upon nearly instantaneous flashing of information and a growing hunger for accurate and timely information.

by lee3022 on Sep 21, 2009 2:13 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

We do change the game

Not as the plays that are made, but as an entertainment in which the game really is.

As being one of the unfortunate fan that cannot get Comcast. I get much more feel of the game here then I do on the radio or NBA.com.

bbk

by BBK on Sep 21, 2009 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

feeling your pain

Hard to understand the years of unfulfilled promises.

And i agree that fan support are a key part of the championship contender equation. Ultimately we pay the freight (glad BE is still free!).

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

We've been told KP reads Bedge

Apparently, then, something here does make a difference.

There is little doubt that, with this many fans discussing strategy, possibilities, scenarios, personnel moves, etc, that some ideas have come up which the Blazer brain trust haven’t thought of themselves, and which could be profitable at least in some scenarios. There are a lot of really knowledgeable people in the Bedge community.

The biggest benefit to the team, though, is that it increases the fan base, and increases the intensity of the fan base. Ultimately, in an entertainment industry, that is a very important contribution.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 21, 2009 3:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Forgot to attribute lee3022

in my final paragraph — he made the point before I did

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 21, 2009 3:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

but likely not before you thought it! You are way ahead of me in every discussion. But thanks.

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

More informed = more involved

I played all the sports in highschool but have never been a real sports guy in my adult life. I now know more about the game of basketball and the Blazers than I ever have before. I watch every blazers game now. That wasn’t the case just two yeas ago. All of this is because I happened apon Blazers Edge. I’m glad I did.

by Nate9Dawg on Sep 21, 2009 3:06 AM PDT reply actions  

we're spreading the love

passion is contagious. It’s especially great for us out of town blazer fans to have a community that supports the same things.

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Sep 21, 2009 6:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't think the difference is that large if you really wanted to get into the profession in some capacity

The biggest roadblock for someone like me – and there are undoubtedly a few – would probably be that I have no pro player or coaching experience. For someone else it might be the lack of business experience. Or no interest in legal work where Blazers assistant Tom Penn excels. No willingness to travel. Whatever. But it can be done even if you might never be the most talented expert. There are courses for this kind of work like there are for most any profession. Internships. Then learning comes by doing. You don’t start as the GM or head coach (even though some former players seem to believe that) or head of scouting for an NBA team, you rather start as an assistant (if you are lucky), a scout for a small college or high school, an administrator in a minor league, a videographer, something like that. And trying to quantify and strategize things in sports has given rise to more people who don’t have a background as an active “participant” at the highest level.

At least one of the SBN bloggers is now working for a D-League team and the Vegas Summer League (Scott from Ridiculous Upside). His predecessor is writing for a magazine I think. One of Daryl Morey’s assistants in Houston developed the ESPN trade machine. Another one was hired right out of business school. Morey himself has a non-traditional background in statistics/computer science. Most of the ESPN insiders are kind of self-trained in scouting and analyzing over a decade or so (Thorpe, Ford, Hollinger, …). Hollinger basically did what Kevin Pelton & Co. at Basketball Prospectus is doing now, he just was ahead of his time. There are a number of sites like that, and some of them are the same resources the writing pros or the actual pros use. Some player agents were just lucky to be with a star player in college at the same time and he trusted them. I recently learned one of their fantasy football writers on ESPN was a screenwriter before working on Married with Children and Crocodile Dundee in LA. Odd but successful crossover. Kahn was a sportswriter, knew the right people and soon was an assistant GM and owned D-League teams. Heck, even Vecsey tried to become a GM a long time ago. And Bill Simmons, who is also a self-trained sports observer and rather a (comedy) writer and producer by profession ;-)

"I think he can still play" - Kevin Pritchard on Juwan Howard

by Norsktroll on Sep 21, 2009 6:45 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

This is exactly what I was thinking

Hard work, an interest bordering on obsession, and pursuing your passion goes further than simple knowledge—because the knowledge will come with time and a willingness to learn. I think that several in the BE community could possibly know more about the league and basketball in general than KP. However, there’s more to it than knowledge—it takes an opportunity as well, and KP being a one-time NBA player is something that (I assume) none of those people here have. So he has the opportunity and everything else to go with it.

"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder

by jamon51 on Sep 21, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good points

I was trying to think of a single instance in which a star NBA player became successful as a GM. But MJ, Isiah and Kevin McHale keep blocking any further searching! Can you think of one?

And our own Casey Holdahl has earned himself employment of the first order!

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

For example Danny Ainge (Boston, All-Star appearance) and Danny Ferry (Cavaliers, NBA Champion 2003) were NBA players. Not major stars, but well…

"I think he can still play" - Kevin Pritchard on Juwan Howard

by Norsktroll on Sep 23, 2009 2:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

BE gives me more insight

3 years ago during the summer slumber period, with no news on the Blazers to be found in the newspaper, a friend to3 years ago during the summer slumber period, with no news on the Blazers to be found in the newspaper, a friend told me to start reading blogs. My answer what in hell is a blog. Well after stimulating my uncomputerized 70 year brain, I got the point.

I started out on Blazers.com and found Barretts blog in which I thought was fantastic. Within a couple of weeks, I had cought up on all the news and started to complain again, only this time on a post. I had never posted before on a blog since I had just now found out about. I wrote my complaint and emmitaitly someone wrote a reply. He or she told me to try BE.com. Wow fantastic results.

I never knew the games inside the games; I learned a whole new perspective of BB. It was fascinating. I was able to join in. I got replies on my thoughts, some good and some not so good as I didn’t really know the language of Posting or what some of the shortcuts on words meant. I finally got brave and started asking questions about BB and about abbreviations for words. My first question was what in heck does IMO mean LOL. But the reply wasn’t given in a sarcastic way. That gave me courage to start asking questions concerning the game itself. I have learned more in the last 3 year then I had in a life-time of watching the Blazers (since 1970). I even got 2 green posts in which I had to ask why my post turned green. jscot gave me the answer so he or she became my favorite poster.

I was told that many players’ reads BE. In most cases it gives them confidence, in other cases it gives them insight on what they should be working on and why. Therefore BE does make the difference. The synergy of the fan post makes a difference to other fans.

Keep up the great work

Hg alias BBK
ld me to start reading blogs. My answer what in hell is a blog. Well after stimulating my uncomputerized 70 year brain, I got the point.

I started out on Blazers.com and found Barretts blog in which I thought was fantastic. Within a couple of weeks, I had cought up on all the news and started to complain again, only this time on a post. I had never posted before on a blog since I had just now found out about. I wrote my complaint and emmitaitly someone wrote a reply. He or she told me to try BE.com. Wow fantastic results.

I never knew the games inside the games, I learned a whole new perspective of BB. It was fasinating. I was able to join in. I got replies on my thoughts, some good and not so good as I didn’t really know the language of Posting or what some of the shorcuts on words meant.

by BBK on Sep 21, 2009 7:05 AM PDT reply actions  

flagged for redundant redundancy

hehe

"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles

by 92wastheyear on Sep 21, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

My wife doesn't think so

But you can make your own judgment.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 22, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well nobody told me

You defended me when I was in a pickle --So you are still my favorite poster

hg

by BBK on Sep 22, 2009 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't remember the pickle

but I remember explaining the green to you.

Are pickles green? :) One thing is for sure, when your comments are turning green, you aren’t in a pickle.

Thanks for the nice words. There are a lot of good posters on Bedge.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 22, 2009 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Flagged

for ad hominem. Poor AK.

Backcourt game - 24/7

by pxilpooshr on Sep 21, 2009 7:23 AM PDT reply actions  

LOL

You know Dave loves you when he takes cheap shots at you on the main page.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 21, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nah, it was a fair shot at me.

Besides, I’ll admit I’m sometimes way too hard on members of the Portland Trail Blazers front office staff. That, along with me having no inside knowledge of the NBA — both on and off the court — and not even a modicum discernible basketball skill, means that I’m nothing more than a bona fide amateur. I, however, am a pro at ranting and raving like some kind of deranged, hysterical crackpot, although occasionally my mad scientist esque outbursts hit the mark. It’s up to y’all to figure out which times I’m right about things, because I certainly can’t do it with any regularity.

Stupid people have stupid ideas.

by AK1984 on Sep 21, 2009 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Better to be hysterical

than historical, after all.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 22, 2009 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

I once caught myself wondering if your act was really from a 63 year old grandmother coming out of her shell

 - picture a secret garage and a super Harley with all the leathers and a helmet that doesn’t let anyone know she is in there terrifying the night streets!.

I give you a hard time for your method of expressing opinions but it is never intended to be personal. Maybe I am that grandmother as well? On the web one never knows! I do appreciate your humility here (your image is slipping).

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's what makes bantering with AK so fun

He knows he’s raving at times and admits it often enough.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 23, 2009 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is what my post was meant to look like

3 years ago during the summer slumber period, with no news on the Blazers to be found in the newspaper, a friend told me to start reading blogs. My answer what in hell is a blog. Well after stimulating my un-computerized 70 year brain, I got the point.

I started out on Blazers.com and found Barrett’s blog in which I thought was fantastic. Within a couple of weeks, I had caught up on all the news and started to complain again, only this time on a post. I had never posted before on a blog since I had just now found out about. I wrote my complaint and immediately someone wrote a reply. He or she told me to try BE.com. Wow fantastic results.

I never knew the games inside the games; I learned a whole new perspective of BB. It was fascinating. I was able to join in. I got replies on my thoughts, some good and some not so good as I didn’t really know the language of Posting or what some of the shortcuts on words meant. I finally got brave and started asking questions about BB and about abbreviations for words. My first question was what in heck does IMO mean LOL. But the reply wasn’t given in a sarcastic way. That gave me courage to start asking questions concerning the game itself. I have learned more in the last 3 year then I had in a life-time of watching the Blazers (since 1970). I even got 2 green posts in which I had to ask why my post turned green. jscot gave me the answer so he or she became my favorite poster.

I was told that many players’ reads BE. In most cases it gives them confidence, in other cases it gives them insight on what they should be working on and why. Therefore BE does make the difference. The synergy of the fan post makes a difference to other fans.

Keep up the great work

Hg alias BBK

by BBK on Sep 21, 2009 7:26 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

My thoughts

are here

"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles

by 92wastheyear on Sep 21, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

btw............ +92

"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles

by 92wastheyear on Sep 21, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

By the way a wonderful resource

for the current language and abbreviations is the Urban Dictionary. Warning for profanity in case your grandkids get there. You can look up nearly anything and get it here.

In Firefox I use an extension called hyperwords which allows me to block a word and reference any number of dictionaries, Wikipedia, etc including the Urban Dictionary without leaving the webpage I am on.

(you probably know all this already).

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Man, are you kidding me?

Blogs, in general, are on the verge of completely overthrowing print media, and you wonder if you make a difference?

I think you need look no further than the evolution of some of the principal issues surrounding the Blazers this summer. Let me take one single example: the contract of B-Roy.

The blogs—particularly this blog—was the voice of patience and reason. Who represnted the shrill-shrieking overraction? Print-media. The professionals, as you’ve dubiously labeled them. This is a distinct patter of behavior: pros are giving us yellow-press sensationalism while blogs the reasoned discourse.

And the fans are responding.

Second, I think your astronomy analogy is inaccurate. In the astronomical profession, you’re talking about people with years of specialized math and equipment… AND EVEN HERE THE AMATEURS ARE MAKING CONTRIBUTIONS.

In the world of sports, the “pros” in the sense of coaches, sports-writers, GMs, etc are nothing more than the product of general bachelors degrees in liberal arts or have formerly played. In neither case does this give them the same specialized skill set.

What it does mean is that they are ingrained with the traditions and orthodoxies that tend to dominate the field. In short, they are expert in a language (lingo) and base set of assumptions.

Amateurs are gaining a well-documented history of having an enormous degree of influence over this field—much to their horror.

As one example, look at the effect of the Baseball Prospectus that led to the rise of Billy Beane (see Moneyball) and ultimately the new set of statistics being used to evaluate baseball.

As another exmaple, look at what a similar group of people at Football Outsiders are doing to football: through the use of amateurs, they are logging every single play for every single down in an NFL season and using it to chart an entirely new set of statistics. Currently, their DVOA is some of the most advanced statistical methodology in football.

So much so that ESPN hired them full time. I call that influence.

Amateurs, in the sense that you’re using it, is raising too high the importance and skill set of the curernt crop of “pros” and demaning too much the impact of people who are very, very good at certain types of analysis and communication in other fields and what they can bring to the sport of basketball.

False humility? Dave, I think you sell far too short your influence and the potential influence that you and others have.

Buck Williams for the hall of fame

by Phizbin on Sep 21, 2009 9:11 AM PDT reply actions  

On the verge of completely overthrowing?

That’s a pretty large bit of hyperbole. For all of the great opinion work and analysis done here at BE, we’re still almost wholly dependent on the reporting done by Quick, Smith, Freeman et al. to provide the Blazer news, something that blogs in general (at least sports blogs, some political blogs have started to make inroads into) have nothing to do with. Even BE is ahead of the curve a little bit by at least having Ben around to go to practices and such.

But of all the big stories of the offseason, all but one (Pendy’s surgery) was introduced by Quick and Freeman. How many times a week do Ben and Dave link to an original Oregonian story before providing their own analysis of the situation? Rarer but still common are links to stories from the national media. Talking about the traditional media like it only consists of Canzano is completely unfair to the service that they provide.

Just because people use BE as their source of Blazers news doesn’t make it the primary source. If the Oregonian were to fire Quick and Freeman, the Columbian fired Smith, etc., and not replace them, that’d be a humongous blow not only to BlazersEdge, but also to Blazer fans. It’s nice to come to BE and have a one stop shop of all the aggregated links from multiple sources, but that doesn’t mean the original sources didn’t do 100% of the work in generating the content.

by Royster on Sep 21, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Your point is well taken

but overstated. We are also an original source. Ben does far more than just “go to practices and such” and to characterize it as such kind of belittles his work. We certainly appreciate, enjoy working alongside, and yes…depend on Quick and Freeman and now Smith as well as the other mainstream sources.

—Dave

by Dave on Sep 21, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also, the change would mostly be a matter of TIMING and personal interest features.

I do not rely on Quick and Freeman for their basketball expertise. Most times I end up trying to search for the bread in the midst of an oversized basket. For that matter, I do not even trust them when they say things like, "Daunte Cunningham can’t be expected to go out on the floor and chase guys like Travis or Nic." Really? Maybe if he bulks up too much??

There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.

by KINGofMACct on Sep 21, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry, I did go overboard there

I didn’t mean to belittle the work that Ben does, particularly in season his media row reports are superb, I just think BE where BE and traditional media excel right now are in two completely separate arenas. While BE no doubt represents a solid amount of reporting as an original source, I believe it accounts for a minority of the content discussed here which is usually triggered by another outlet’s reporting. I don’t mean this as an insult to BE or blogs at all. They weren’t founded and I’d imagine almost none consider it a part of their purpose to generate news but instead to provide analysis and a forum for discussion.

It is in this latter area that I think, frankly, that blogs, but BE in particular, trounce traditional media. The combination of a dedicated fan base with some talented writers and good basketball minds make for a much more thoughtful and engaging source of analysis than reading a traditional columnist who has their attentions divided and is coming from a different perspective than a typical fan. There are still great columnists out there, but by and large, I would mind a lot more if BE suddenly got taken off the net than if they stopped writing.

Because people tend to pay more attention to the opinion/analysis part, I can see why it’s easy to say that print media is dead, but that attitude seems to completely neglect any actual reporting done by media outlets, which I think it very important in terms of driving content. Probably moreso at blogs that don’t have a guy like Ben around, but still a ton here, too.

I didn’t mean to imply that BE would be nothing without them, but characterizing the blog as “on the verge of completely overthrowing print media” is way off base, not only in the sense of what they provide to Blazer fans, but also what they provide to BE.

by Royster on Sep 21, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have it right there

I think. I’ve always viewed the two forms of media as distinct with different aims and requiring different skills. I don’t believe one form replaces the other. They each bring goodness in their own way.

—Dave

by Dave on Sep 21, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

BE has replaced all other Blazers-related media for me

So as far as I’m concerned, print media is dead.

"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder

by jamon51 on Sep 21, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Me too

I still go when linked from here but don’t bother reading otherwise. Dave and Ben do such a great job of pointing the way and linking when appropriate and they and so many talented and diverse posters here bring such depth and breadth to each issue that this is way more fun and personal.

Newspapers are mostly struggling to survive. The most important source we have while the team is traveling is the beat writer. Perhaps SB Nation will organize blog-to-blog coverage of visiting teams for home member sites. That would still not supplant the beat writers because, among other things I think they get to travel with the team.

by lee3022 on Sep 22, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Contributions v Analysis

I see major news outlets cutting staff and closing doors. When they do, they typically cite the evils of the internet and that damned mob of scribbling bloggers (apologies to Nathaniel Hawthorne) as the cause.

But let’s look at original contribution. Even conceding the point that Quick and Freeman break the stories (which I do not, btw, as I see most of their stories are merely a result of their access, which is not something of unique value), there are still many examples of the sports world being effectively and greatly influenced by “amateur” work.

If there is one thing that most fans will agree upon, it is that the box score is the most ridiculous thing imaginable for chronicling the internal results of a game (at least, after the score). It is the work of amateurs that are pushing the envelope in these areas.

Buck Williams for the hall of fame

by Phizbin on Sep 21, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

The "evils of the internet" that are affecting newspapers

go way beyond bloggers siphoning off readers, especially sports bloggers. It’s more of a question of the business model than the newspaper itself, which the internet has basically come in and completely destroyed from the second that news outlets made the joint decision that content should be free online.

Before the internet, the only way to get access to a newspaper article was to either buy a newspaper or subscribe, so they were placing a price on that content, which helped pay for the costs of reporting. Now that it’s free online, all I need to do is get on the internet, log on to oregonlive, and read whatever article I want without paying a dime to the Oregonian. Sure there’s still online ads, but revenue from them is no doubt much less (I don’t have the numbers) than it was even with the print ads they used to sell.

The other major evil of the internet is the rise of craigslist. Classified ads were a huge profit machine for newspapers back in the day, and now that it’s completely free for anyone to post an ad online that will probably reach more people and is less of a hassle, why would anyone use a newspaper classified that they have to pay money for, so you have another big chunk of revenue gone.

If it were just a matter of BE siphoning off readers, how hard would it be for the Oregonian to make Ben and Dave an offer to pay them for their work and throw it under an oregonlive flag? If BE were the difference between the Oregonian failing and succeeding, why wouldn’t they just call up Dave and say “hey, we’ll pay you 100k to run BE exactly as you’re doing, but on a site where we get all the ad revenue?” Maybe that’s a lot to Dave, but if it’s the diference between the newspaper succeeding and failing, it’d be peanuts to them. ESPN has been proactive in this with truehoop and the truehoop network, but then again almost all of ESPN’s “print” presence is online.

It goes beyond just access to having to support additional reporting costs, if BE were to comprehensively try and cover the Blazers. Where is the money going to come from to fly Ben to all the away games? What about on additional feature trips like Quick’s Starkville trip for Outlaw? Most Blazer fans pay nothing to see the stories resulting from these expenses, but we get the benefit of them. There’s simply no way that BE could replicate that work without moving to a likely substantial fee-based subscription system just because I can’t imagine the online ad revenues here are anywhere near enough to pay for flights and accommodations necessary.

Like I said in my response to Dave, the two different outlets (traditional media and “bloggers”) fulfill two largely different functions. There’s a huge gap between saying one is better at something, and saying it’s about to take over the other is neglecting the very real value provided by media currently. Nobody’s doubting the business model needs to be changed right now, but it’s not going to be sports blogs that were the driving result of that change.

by Royster on Sep 21, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Call someone at the paper

We’ll save them…but it’s 150K each plus a car allowance and health benefits.

—Dave

by Dave on Sep 21, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we'd need KP's negotiators

on the deal if they were going to guarantee you that kind of money. I think some incentive clauses would have to be worked out to protect the paper in case of career ending carpal tunnel.

by Royster on Sep 21, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

first with news of juwan howard’s signing, first with news of agreement in principle with hedo that later changed, first (and only) news of luftman’s termination, first with pictures of slimmed-down roy, first with news of shavlik’s workout in miami, first with clarification from bayless that he did workout with oden, first with full scouting reports of pendergraph, cunningham, etc. first with the story of kp’s challenge to roy after his contract extension, that’s just the last 2 months.

by Ben Golliver on Sep 21, 2009 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

not to mention first with analysis of synergy reports on roy, aldridge, etc.

bottom line we had a better summer than every other blazers news outlet in terms of original source reporting.

by Ben Golliver on Sep 21, 2009 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

my bad, my bad

I apologize. I was out of line there with some of my own hyperbole. Keep up the good work.

by Royster on Sep 21, 2009 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not only that

If Quick et al were gone, the team would be giving news releases and interviews to bloggers rather than to the newspaper guys. They have an incentive to keep their public informed, so the news is going to be coming out one way or another.

So the bloggers are moving more and more into the print guys’ territory, and that isn’t going to lessen. The more of those “firsts” that you pick up, the more people will say “Quick and Freeman and Smith and Golliver”.

"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue

by jscot on Sep 22, 2009 1:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I read the Howard signing first on RealGM ;)
Just kidding, you are doing a very good job breaking news.

"I think he can still play" - Kevin Pritchard on Juwan Howard

by Norsktroll on Sep 22, 2009 2:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am not buying the generalized, "huge gap," theory.

Yes, there is a high level experience gap, an information gathering gap, and an NBA insider gap, but for the most part these advantages are time sensitive in nature and have a tendency to dissipate as information leaks out to the general public. In large measure this leaking balloon of information is how NBA executives keep tabs on one another. Much of the same information/misinformation is available to us all in this day and age. The question becomes, "How do interested parties make use of this information when they finally get it."

So, just because execs get the information sooner does not mean that we cannot follow the process pretty well. And, as we follow along, we can learn about our thinking errors as they also learn about their own. The Blazers were behind the curve on Oden’s injury issues, and behind the curve on Kevin Durant’s growth curve, but they have learned a lot more about the situation, and so have we. And as it stands right now, there is a lot more information to come out. It is anybody’s call, and I am sure that GMs still have differing views on the matter.

Yes, there are writers and fans alike that just don’t get it and will always remain substantially behind the curve. But I am sorry, I just don’t buy the concept that all the fans are as much in the dark about NBA basketball as they might be about being a brain surgeon and performing an operation. The gap is just not that large.

There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.

by KINGofMACct on Sep 21, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions  

How can you know how large or small the gap is?

The only folks who know are the ones at the top of the food chain. Maybe one day Dave or Ben can ask
KP to quantify the difference between what he knows and what they know. I’ll bet Dave’s take on the difference is a lot closer than yours (no slam intended) because pros like KP are involved in high-level analyses professionally, have access to the best information and resources, and have the best background and network of contacts.

It’s not that Dave or Ben or AK1984 could not become successful GMs, it’s that you have to be a GM to know what a GM knows.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

We don’t have to know how large the gap is on some abstract level. And we certainly do not need to know all of the GMs on an individual basis.

We can observe what they do. We can evaluate results. We can watch the games and evaluate the players ourselves. As someone who has followed KP for a while, I can say that I have been on board with most of his moves and have even anticipated them to a certain extent.

I would have drafted Oden. I would have drafted Bayless. Even before the free agency period began, Hedo was at the top of my Blazer wish list. Paul Millsap would have received an offer from me, just as he did. Daunte Cunningham was very high on my draft board half way through last season. And I had noticed Jeff Pendergraph early in the season as well.

Even with the more recent addition of Juwan Howard, I was in the ball park on that as well. I had heard all the clamoring for Blair or some other back up power forward who would need playing time, and did not think the need was so vital. I, having believed in Daunte and Jeff for some time, was not so worried about acquiring another backup 4 who would need a bunch of playing time, unless they were like Millsap, very good. On the other hand, I have felt the need to add more leadership and experience, which I felt for some time that the Blazers have been sorely lacking. Enter Juwan Howard. And I am much more pleasantly surprised, than really surprised.

To put it another way, my evaluation of “the gap” is not based on the mysteries of the NBA front offices, I am sure they have their stories to tell also. My evaluation of the gap starts with the end product, and works its way backward. I do not need anyone to tell me that Memphis picking up Allen Iverson and Zach Randolph was bazaar from a winning perspective. I could even speculate a little further about it being an attempt to put butts in the seats of a loosing franchise.

There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.

by KINGofMACct on Sep 21, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bedge has a huge influence,...

1) Keeps remote fans in the loop. How much more do they spend on merchandise because they feel in the loop?
2) Is my #1 source for news, too.
3) Complements print and TV by adding depth of analysis
4) Is the true “voice of the fan”.
5) KP reads it! Enough said!

Speaking of which, I’ve been wondering how many posters here actually work for the Blazers? Any of you willing to raise your hand?

Blazers: RUN away with the title!

KP: Please don't trade the next decade's Scottie Pippen (Batum), Spanish Larry Bird (Rudy), Bill Russell (GO) or Captain BRoy - at least until they 3-peat..

by Visionary2 on Sep 21, 2009 1:37 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't work for the Blazers

But sure willing to forward my resume to whomever is hiring.

Buck Williams for the hall of fame

by Phizbin on Sep 21, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm