What teams look to have cap space in 2010?
This is, of course, a very preliminary guess as to which teams will have significant cap space next summer (ie, more than the expected MLE amount) to be able to make either free agent acquisitions or for use in making lopsided trades. And let me be clear that all we can do today is guess – we don’t know what next year’s salary cap will be, trades and signings that take place over the next 10 months will obviously affect team salary situations, etc. So for purposes of this evaluation, I am forced to assume that no major roster changes will take place. Yes, I know that in the real NBA, they will – and when they do, this prediction will, of course, be changed. But until then…..
Oh, and for purposes of this ‘prediction’, I’m assuming a cap figure of $53.5 million. That assumes that BRI will drop significantly in the coming year and that predicted BRI for the 2010-11 season drops as well. Over the last several months, not only have individuals predicted that this will occur, the NBA distributed a memo to its teams warning them of an expected drop in BRI which would directly affect the 2010-11 salary cap figure. I am using the top end of the prediction from this memo for this prognostication.
————————————–
So here are my best guesses as to which teams will have significant cap space next summer, baring any major player transactions that would, of course, adjust these predictions. I’ve tried to make the best assumptions possible about team options, player options, guaranteed contracts and ETOs, but as I’m not an expert on every team in the NBA and what they are likely to do, I reserve the right to adjust these guesses over time as I receive your inevitable feedback (which is absolutely welcome!) on which of these are likely and unlikely to actually count in next season’s figures:
CHICAGO currently has 4 players under contract for 2010-11 in Deng, Hinrich, Johnson and Gibson. I’m assuming that the team options for Derrick Rose and Joakim Noah will also be picked up. John Salmons has an ETO and there will be a cap hold for their 1st round draft pick (I’m assuming they’ll pick #19). If the Bulls do not give Tyrus Thomas a qualifying offer and renounce his Bird rights, the Bulls could have $12.76 million in cap room if Salmons does not exercise his ETO and $18.10 million if he does opt out and is renounced. [This figure includes calculations for 4 cap holds - 5 if Salmons opts out -of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster]
HOUSTON currently has 5 players under contract for 2010-11 in Battier, Ariza, Andersen, Budinger and Taylor. I’m assuming that the team options for Carl Landry, Chuck Hayes and Aaron Brooks will be picked up and that Yao Ming does not exercise his ETO. I also assume that Joey Dorsey is not cut before July 1st (which guarantees his 2010-11 salary) and that their own 1st round pick in 2010 is #12, which adds a cap hold of $1.68 million. If no qualifying offer is made to Kyle Lowry, Houston could have $7.55 million in cap room. [This figure includes a calculation for 1 cap hold of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster]
LA CLIPPERS currently have Baron Davis, Chris Kaman and Blake Griffin under contract for 2010-11. I’m assuming that they pick up the team options for Eric Gordon and Al Thornton, and that Sebastian Telfair picks up his player option. Assuming that they don’t get Minnesota’s 1st round pick and that their own 1st round pick is #16, that adds a cap hold of $1.37 million. I’m also assuming that DeAndre Jordan is retained and that his full contract counts against the cap. After accounting for 4 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, the Clippers look to have $11.19 million in cap room if they do not make a qualifying offer to Mardy Collins.
MIAMI currently has no players fully guaranteed for 2010-11, but that doesn’t mean that they won’t have any players on their roster on July 1st. I’m assuming that the Heat pick up the team options on Michael Beasley, Daequan Cook and Mario Chalmers and that Joel Anthony picks up his player option. Also, I’m assuming that their 1st round draft pick is #18 and that they don’t get Toronto’s 1st round pick ,which adds a single cap hold of $1.24 million. Finally, I’m assuming that they don’t retain James Jones, so that only the guaranteed amount of his contract ($1.86 million) counts, which means that there will be 6 cap holds of $473,604 applied for having fewer than 12 players on the roster. In the end, Miami looks to have $21.54 million in cap room if Dwyane Wade picks up his player option. If Wade does not pick up his player option, his free agent cap hold will leave the Heat with $22.12 million in cap room.
MINNESOTA currently has Jefferson, Sessions, Flynn, Hollins and Ellington guaranteed for 2010-11. I’m assuming that they pick up the team options for Love, Brewer and Pecherov. As for 1st round draft picks, the assumption is that their own pick will be #3 and that they will also have #21 from Utah, but not get Charlotte’s 1st round pick – these two carry cap holds totalling $4.53 million. Rubio’s cap hold will also be in play at $2.81 million. Finally, I’m assuming that they release Ryan Gomes so that only the $1.0 million guaranteed counts against their cap in July – which also means a single cap hold for $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster. All this would leave the Timberwolves with $11.39 million in cap room.
NEW JERSEY currently has just Devin Harris and Terrence Williams guaranteed for 2010-11. However, I assume that the team will pick up the team options on Jianlian, Lopez, Lee, Douglas-Roberts and Sean Williams. In terms of 1st round draft picks, I’m assuming that their own pick will be #5 and that they also get the #23 pick from Dallas, which means cap holds for $3.81 million. I’m also assuming that they do not release Najera and that his full salary counts against the cap, but that they do release Dooling so that only $500,000 of his salaries is applied against the cap. Finally, I’m assuming that Josh Boone does not get a qualifying offer, which means that there will be 2 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster. This would leave the Nets with $22.87 million in cap room.
NEW YORK currently has just Hill and Douglas guaranteed for 2010-11, although my assumption is that Curry picks up his player option and Jeffries does not exercise his ETO. I also assume that the Knicks pick up the team options on both Gallinari and Chandler. After accounting for 6 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster, the Knicks would be left with $23.32 million in cap room.
OKLAHOMA CITY currently has Collison, Krstic, Harden, Mullens and Ibaka under contract for 2010-11. I’m making the assumption that the team picks up the team options on Durant, Westbrook, Green and White. As for 1st round draft picks, I’m assuming that their own pick is #10 and that they get #14 from Phoenix, which makes for cap holds for $3.38 million. Finally, I’m assuming that Sefolosha does not get a qualifying offer and that the team keeps Weaver, guaranteeing his $0.94 million. This would leave the Thunder with $14.54 million in cap room.
SACRAMENTO currently has Martin, Nocioni, Udrih, Garcia, Evans and Casspi under contract for 2010-11, however the assumption is that they also pick up the team options on Hawes, Thompson and Greene. I’m also assuming that they end up with the overall #1 pick in the draft which adds a cap hold of $4.29 million. Finally, I’m assuming that no qualifying offer is given to Rodriguez, meaning that there will be 2 cap holds of $473,604 for having fewer than 12 players on the roster. This would leave the Kings with $7.62 million in cap room.
——————————————-
Here, quickly, are the teams that look to be above the cap next summer, baring any major roster moves between now and then:
ATLANTA – Even before re-signing Joe Johnson, the Hawks have Smith, Crawford, Williams, Bibby, Pachulia and Horford under contract (among others). I’m also assuming they make another Qualifying Offer to Josh Childress. All of this should keep Atlanta well above the cap next summer.
BOSTON – I guess Paul Pierce could use his ETO and give up more than $21 million. But I don’t think there’s any way he will. You add Garnett, Wallace and Perkins and those four players take the Celtics pretty much to the amount of the salary cap by themselves – meaning that even if they don’t re-sign Ray Allen, Boston is going to be above the cap.
CHARLOTTE – If somehow Michael Jordan’s dreams come true and Chandler, Radmanovic and Mohammed all exercise their ETOs, the Bobcats will be below the cap. Now let’s get back to reality – all those guys will take the guaranteed money and Charlotte will have no cap room next summer.
CLEVELAND – OK, if LeBron James leaves, the Cavaliers will have major cap room. But since this piece assumes that he won’t (see paragraph #1), even if he doens’t pick up his option, his cap hold will be nearly as much as what his current salary for 2010-11 is set at. That puts Cleveland either above the cap or perhaps – if the team takes some savings out of Delonte West’s partial guarantee – a couple of million below the cap. Either way, they won’t have significant (ie, greater than the MLE amount) cap room.
DALLAS – Sure, there’s a chance that the Mavericks could have cap space. But unless Dirk Nowitzki turns down $21 million and leaves town, Erick Dampier does not meet the performance incentives necessary to make his 2010-11 amount guaranteed and Mark Cuban decides not to pick up the team option on Josh Howard, they will be. My money’s on “they’ll be above the cap”
DENVER – Anthony, Billups, Nene, Smith Anderson, Lawson – just those 6 players bring the Nuggets to the predicted cap amount, even before accounting for players like Martin (ETO), Afflalo (TO) and Balkman (QO?). No cap space for Denver.
DETROIT – Their opportunity for having cap space was this past summer, and they took that opportunity and spent all the cap room that they had avialable. Now they will have Hamilton, Prince, Gordon, Villaneuva, Maxiell, Wilcox, Stuckey and Daye on their roster in 2010-11, meaning that the Pistons will not have cap room.
GOLDEN STATE – With Ellis, Biedrins, Maggette, Jackson, Turiaf and Curry the Warriors have committed themselves to $45 million in salary. Assuming they pick up the team options on Wright. Law and Randolph, the Warriors don’t look to be paying any luxury tax in the Spring of 2011, but they don’t look to have any cap room next summer.
INDIANA – They’ll be paying out $58 million to Murphy, Granger, Dunleavy, Ford, Foster, the two Joneses and to ex-Pacer Tinsley. They’ll probably also be paying out another $3.7 million to Rush and Hibbert. That puts them will above the expected cap.
LA LAKERS - Even if Kobe Bryant opted out and left the Lakers high and dry (not that I expect that to happen), the combined salaries of Gasol, Odom, Bynum, Artest, Vujacic and Walton alone would keep the Lakers above the cap. I think it’s safe to say that the Lakers will not have cap space next summer.
MEMPHIS – There’s a general feeling that Memphis will once again have cap room to spend next summer. The numbers don’t back this up. Randolph, Jaric, Thabeet, Gasol, Haddadi, Carroll and Young represent over $36.5 million in committed salary. The Grizzlies will almost certainly pick up the team options on Mayo, Conley and Arthur, which adds another $10.5 million. Memphis will have their own 1st round draft pick along with the 1st round picks from Denver and the Lakers, which should add another $5 million in cap holds. That’s $52 million in team salary even before accounting for Rudy Gay and his free agent status. No, unless they make some drastic salary cuts during the next 9 months, the Grizzlies do not look to have cap room next summer.
MILWAUKEE – After paying Redd, Bogut, Gadzuric, Bell, Delfino, Alexander, Jennings, Ilyasova, Ukic and Meeks their $53.5 million, the Bucks won’t have any cap space. Sure, Redd could exercise his ETO, but his free agent cap hold would still be large enough to keep the Bucks near enough to the cap that they wouldn’t have any room.
NEW ORLEANS – Count me surprised that after trying to trade Tyson Chandler in a salary dump earlier in the year, the Hornets spent the summer committing themselves to long-term salaries for players like Okafor and Songaila. Their concern in 2010-11 will not be trying to get under the cap but trying to get under the tax threshold, as Paul, Stojakovic, Okafor, West, Posey, Peterson, Songaila, Wright and Collison by themselves represent well over $70 million in salary.
ORLANDO – Another team that committed themselves to long-term salary this past summer, Orlando will also have as their main financial concern not trying to get under the cap but trying to get under the tax threshold. Lewis, Carter and Howard by themselves put the Magic over the cap – and they also have to pay Nelson, Gortat, Pietrus, Bass, Barnes, Anderson and the rest of their roster.
PHILADELPHIA – It should come as no surprise that the Sixers, who have committed themselves to paying the trio of Brand, Iguodala and Delembert a combined $41 million in 2010-11 do not figure to have cap space. Not when they also have to pay Kopono, Green, Williams, Young, Speights, Holiday and Smith – among others.
PHOENIX – Nash, Richardson and Barbosa will count as a combined figure of nearly $32 million. Gragic and Clark will make nearly $4 million. There are team options for Lopez, Dudley and Tucker representing another $6 million. Hill and Frye hold player options for another $5.4 million. And all of this doesn’t even account for Stoudemire – who could exercise his ETO, yes, but whose free agent cap hold would still keep the team above the cap. Even if he left outright, the team still might not have greater-than-MLE-level caproom. That’s why they’re in this list and not the one above.
PORTLAND – Roy has his maximum extension that starts in 2010-11. Aldridge will either have his own extension or will have a huge free agent cap hold. Oden, Webster, Bayless, Fernandez, Batum, Cunningham and Pendergraph represent more than $24.5 million in salary. Add in more than $3.5 million in cap holds for their upcoming 1st round draft pick and former 1st round picks Claver, Freeland and Koponen and the Blazers look to be just about right at the cap figure next July – even if free agents Blake and Outlaw are allowed to walk away. Plus, if Joel Przybilla decides not to exercise his ETO, that will guarantee that Portland is well above the cap (and even if he does, he'll still have a large free agent cap hold).
SAN ANTONIO – the Spurs, not surprisingly, are more concerned with trying to win another championship while they still have the services of Tim Duncan than they are about trying to get under the cap next summer. Duncan and Parker will make more than $32 million combined in 2010-11, Jefferson will count either as his $15 million salary or will have a huge cap hold as a free agent if he utilizes his ETO, Ginobli will have a cap hold of his own that should be well over $15 million – then add in the rest of the roster. Yeah, big surprise that the Spurs won’t be under the cap next summer.
TORONTO - the Raptors are another team that added a lot of long-term salary this past summer that will guarantee them to be well above the cap next summer. Turkoglu, Calderon, Bargnani, Jack, Evans, Banks and DeRozen themselves represent nearly $44 million in salary. Bellinelli and Weems represent another possible $3 million. Then add in either Bosh’s $17 million salary or a huge cap hold if he chooses not to pick up his player option. And even if Bosh leaves, the amount of cap room that the Raptors will hold might not be of the larger-than-MLE variety.
UTAH – Kirilenko, Williams, Millsap, Okur, Miles, Maynor and Price themselves represent more than $56 million in committed salary. Safe to say that even if Boozer walks as a free agent, the Jazz will be above the cap next summer.
WASHINGTON – The Wizards already have more than $45 million committed to Arenas, Jamison, Butler and Blatche. Stevenson has a player option for more than $4 million. There are team options for Young, McGee and Crittendon that represent another $6.5 million. Plus the team has to deal with free agents Miller, Foye and Haywood (among others). In short, I do not expect the Wizards to have any cap room next summer – and if they do, it won’t be more than MLE-level.
——————————————
Whew! OK, your turn now to tell me if I've got anything wrong so that I can update these predictions!
21 recs |
43 comments
Comments
great read
thank you again storyteller
C*mcast sucks!
by Blazermaniac77 on Sep 13, 2009 7:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My interpretation of this is that most of the big name players are actually going to take pay cuts next year.
There just isn’t enough space available to pay everybody what they’re expecting. The Knicks, for example. Sure, they’ll have enough to sign Lebron, but they won’t have enough to sign another A-list player. If Lebron makes around $14mil in the first, the most they could offer player #2 is $8 mil. Right?
I’m just glad we won’t be in the middle of the free agent frenzy. Hell, we couldn’t even compete in an off year for free agents.
Whatever
thetinfoil@gmail.com
by TheTinfoil on Sep 13, 2009 7:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't say most big name players will take pay cuts
some will, but the cream of the 2010 crop (LeBron, Wade, etc.) who are clearly max contracts won’t take pay cuts. Regardless of what happens to the salary cap, their maximum salaries are based on what they made the year previous, not a percentage of the salary cap.
by tingeyga on Sep 13, 2009 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LBJ and Wade will get theirs
it is the players like Boozer, Joe Johnson, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, Shaq, T-Mac, Rudy Gay, Michael Redd, Manu, or maybe even Bosh who will have to take less if they want to switch teams, (and in Boozer’s case he will take less no matter what because the Jazz won’t take him back).
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Sep 14, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So your saying its going to be a crazy summer....
SWEEP THE LEG!
by In Walks Rudy on Sep 13, 2009 7:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
my insta-rec list:
jscot
Norkstroll
Storyteller
"Put your drawers on, and take your gun off."
by cloudydays on Sep 14, 2009 12:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i feel like im forgetting someone...
"Put your drawers on, and take your gun off."
by cloudydays on Sep 14, 2009 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fatty? is that who you’re forgeting?
by SonsofShawnKemp on Sep 14, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaa
"Put your drawers on, and take your gun off."
by cloudydays on Sep 14, 2009 2:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
flag
(rec that if you will)
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 14, 2009 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
only on fanposts
"Put your drawers on, and take your gun off."
by cloudydays on Sep 14, 2009 2:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah
So I have to write a worthless fanpost to test out this insta-reccing.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 14, 2009 3:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
indeed... but please make it at least a little contraversial.
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
"New Man Law: If you don't show up for the draft you don't get to come later if you're picked. If you believe in yourself, show up and sit there. If nobody else believes in you, take it and cry like a man...in front of the cameras."
-Dave
by faith on Sep 14, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That won't work
If it is controversial, then enough people will agree with it to rec it because they agree. It has to be worthless and nothing that will make people want to agree. I’ll have to think about what I can do….
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 14, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wont work.
The Junk drawer gets recs all the time. If you wrote about the fluffiness of particular pocket lints in various parts of the world, I think it would still make the recommended fanpost list.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Sep 14, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could write your life-story
I’d do my own, but it’s so boring that I’d fall asleep before I finished.
I can’t believe we’re trashing Storyteller’s great thread with this conversation. Someone ought to flag this so a moderator will look at it.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 14, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your contributions to this site are appreciated
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 17, 2009 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good overview, that leaves some interesting names with big cap space and some often-rumored teams with not all that much
E.g. New Jersey would be in just the same situation cap space-wise as NY, and they have the more attractive players on the roster with Harris, Lopez, Courtney Lee, Terrence Williams. I would assume they let Yi walk if that nets (pun intended) them a guy like Bosh, Johnson, or maybe even LeBron.
As for Chicago, they seem to have a slim chance to get Wade (though ultimately I think he will just re-sign in Miami) or at least Amare or Boozer as a consolation prize. I also think they will let Thomas walk, and try to trade Hinrich for expirings at the deadline.
With OKC it’s still hard to say if they are willing to spend the cap space they have. If they are, they might attract a quality second-tier free agent.
Minnesota: I doubt Kahn picks up the team option on Pecherov. He is pretty useless and was just a throw-in into the Rubio pick deal with the Wizards, and even if it doesn’t attract a better player to Minny it could save them some money.
Small remark on Dallas: They will be above the cap which is the focus of your post. But that doesn’t mean my other team won’t be active in the offseason. Dampier is the most attractive unguaranteed contract next year, and a team doesn’t have to renounce him until pretty far into the offseason. Meaning Dallas will move him alone or in a package to a team that wants to have an “instantly save up to 18 million on your payroll chip” in a trade or sign and trade. Bobcats for Wallace or Chandler anyone? Milwaukee for Bogut? Even more if packaged with Howard’s expiring deal? That trade could also happen at the deadline of course, but there might be better offers in the summer. And unlike the RLEC Cuban will use the EDEC in such a deal.
There's Gotta Be More To Life
by Norsktroll on Sep 14, 2009 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff
NJ needs to make a decision about Yi before Oct. 31st, which is why I assume he’ll be back for them in 2010-11. Which illustrates the ‘dilemma’ that several of these teams face right now – do we pick up the team option (and be assured of that player’s service in 2010-11) or dump the player for more space and the possibility of getting a better player.
The implications of Wade leaving or staying are huge. If he stays in Miami (and I agree with you that this is the most likely scenario), then they’ve got the ‘advantage’ of already having a superstar on the team (along with a player with talent/potential of stardom in Beasley). As has been pointed out by others in this thread, no one team currently projects to have the cap room to sign two max level players. But if Miami already has one on the roster in Wade and can somehow add another……at the same time, if Wade leaves, then Miami (if they could swing it) would have enough cap room to sign two max players, although at least one would almost certainly be a drop in talent level from Wade.
You make a good point on Pecherov. I went back and forth on him, finally deciding that Kahn might just pick up the option. We’ll know in a couple of months.
"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY
by Storyteller on Sep 14, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great read
one thing jumps out at me: the Grizzlies decision to take on Zach Randolph may or may not hurt them this year, but cripples them in the FA discussion for next year.
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on Sep 14, 2009 5:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
They’re putting a lot of eggs into that basket….
"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY
by Storyteller on Sep 14, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intentionally, probably
Now their fans can’t complain next summer when they neglect to make a 4-5 year max offer to someone.
They’ll have to pay Randolph one more year, is all. That’s cheaper than signing a max player next summer.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 15, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec
I wonder if teams really do this?
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
by OhOhOden on Sep 15, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
but if anyone does, it’s Memphis or the Clippers.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 15, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the name "Memphis"
cripples them in the FA discussion
by In Walks Rudy on Sep 15, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOW how am I supposed to get any work done?
Thanks a lot. Couldn’t you have released this on a Friday afternoon? Where’s the decency, I ask?
by matthewcc on Sep 14, 2009 6:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If I am a free agent not playing Wade’s position, I think Miami would be the most attractive to me. They have a typical “destination” city, large amount of cap space, a superstar, and they are playing in the slightly weaker east.
I get the paper, so I don't care!
by Name's Ash on Sep 14, 2009 8:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If they can keep Wade, they would seem to be the ‘best’ place for a free agent to sign with. That’s if they can keep Wade…..
"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY
by Storyteller on Sep 14, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only a few good destinations on that list.
Because who in their right mind would sign a large, long term contract to play for the Clippers?
Oh. Baron Davis.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Sep 14, 2009 9:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dumb comment
Baron Davis doesn’t have a right mind to be in, does he?
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 14, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the number of teams with a lot of capspace is going to lead to a number of players being overpaid
That’s why I don’t think the Blazers should let Lamarcus become a restricted free agent, he could easily end up with a max offer.
Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin
my last.fm
by Zaron5551 on Sep 14, 2009 12:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
If LMA plays well enough to earn a max offer from another team next summer, wouldn’t the Blazers also view it that he’s worth matching and keeping?
"It's Our Time":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O99POVJfglY
by Storyteller on Sep 14, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think a team with a lot of extra capspace will offer him a max hoping that the blazers won't match, because he doesn't deserve it.
Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin
my last.fm
by Zaron5551 on Sep 14, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But can a team afford to keep max money tied up for a week while all the top-tier agents leave?
Maybe. Maybe if they just really really want to be jerks.
You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.
by austinpwnz on Sep 14, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
there will probably be teams with cash to spend and no top tier free agents to spend it on by the end of july-middle of august
Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin
my last.fm
by Zaron5551 on Sep 14, 2009 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If LMA is a max player
we will have offered him that by the first week of July.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 15, 2009 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope they get a deal done by early next week, because
I want to see LMA get the Roy(al) treatment. A big KP and Nate press conference, interviews, radio spots, the works. He needs an LMA appreciation day to start off the season right.
If he signs after training camp starts it may get blended in with the rest of the preseason activity.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Sep 15, 2009 3:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it would be nice to have it done
but I’m not particularly worried if it doesn’t happen.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Sep 15, 2009 3:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers do save some money on raises and one fewer year to match a max (about $20M less risk)
But the risk is LMA is fed up and wants to leave, making it harder to match as well.
I just listen for Casey. His voice gives me tingles. —Dave
by lee3022 on Sep 18, 2009 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that I am volunteering or anything
but the companion piece to this overview would be a list of available free agents with a range of first-salaries (expected to maximum). Then we could match up teams with cap space with possible free agents and eliminate those who don’t fit.
Ah for the time to do it all….
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
by OhOhOden on Sep 15, 2009 8:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The sign and trade possibilities make that harder
That is how Toronto was able to offer Hedon’t so much more than Portland could (or would).
I just listen for Casey. His voice gives me tingles. —Dave
by lee3022 on Sep 18, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















