Dwight Jaynes Calling Out Roy's Agent
As always Dwight makes some good points. There is really no reason to be going public with this stuff.
over 2 years ago
Escrote
14 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Probably shouldn't have gone public with it.
But we sure ate it up. Ahh. Summer. Where any news is big news.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
A journalist complaining about making something out of nothing?
Irony at its best, folks.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
by Arby on Aug 5, 2009 12:22 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I thought you meant Dwight Howard..
It took a little while for it to hit me. :)
by DrScience on Aug 5, 2009 12:25 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Haha, me too
But I can’t imagine a player calling out another player’s agent for trying to get him the max.
Kinda goes against the whole “union” thing.
in my mind
i thought of it as maybe DH once had the same agent and got burned in a deal. you know, he didn’t get me enough money and now he’s screwing with Roy….that type of thing.
On second thought...
Dwight proposes that Bob Myers should have acted “in good faith” and kept everything quiet. Going to the media and getting Roy to say that he was upset with the way negotiations were going put tons of pressure on KP and company to get a deal done.
It’s negotiating leverage, any good agent would do the same thing. Their job is to get as much money for their client as they can. Agents can’t be bullied around or else they wouldn’t be good agents. How could Myers sign a high-profile player if he displays an inability to get his guys what they’re worth?
i thought it was dwight howard at first
was like woahhhh roy and dwight boyz now
Trade for Luis Amundson!!Do it KP!!
I fixed the title for you guys... sorry about the confusion,
you should also check out his articles about the Canadian coach, there is some hilarious banter.
Roy had the public behind him
And his agent rightly used that advantage.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
If rightly means stupidly, then yes
going public is a chip. You play it and see how it goes. It’s intended to harm the other negotiating partner. The Blazer were likely to give Roy what he wanted, but were going to wait and see if he caved. Playing the public chip right away diminished the Blazer’s good will and cause significant problems for Blazer management. That’s not good faith, and it is just plain stupid. In a negotiation, you are simply nuts to harm the party opposite until it’s necessary.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
He was merely setting the tone
for LA’s negotiations. He represents both, correct?
WWOPD? What would Optimus Prime do?
different agent, same agency though. i believe
/////
((o))
/////
by Dep H on Aug 5, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs




















