Sham Sports: Blazers Title Triggers Roughly $5 Million Guarantee For Brandon Roy
Sham Sports has an excellent, easy-to-read article about some of the "creative financing" going on around the league this summer. A few examples: weird, nonguaranteed contracts, and deals that descend in value from year to year. If you went radioactive over the "toxic offer," Sham's post is for you.
Surprise, surprise: the contract extension that Brandon Roy just signed is highlighted by Sham because of its "intense" final year guarantee conditions.
To recap, B. Roy signed a 5 year deal with the fifth year being an early termination option. That means, after 4 years Brandon can choose whether to rip up the deal and seek a new one or go on ahead with the fifth year at pre-agreed terms, estimated by Sham (and subject to change) at $19.2 million dollars for that final year.
But, what, exactly are those terms? Check it out...
Signed a 5 year maximum contract extension in August 2009, the values of which are not yet known exactly because the maximum salary for the 2010/11 season has not been calculated yet (and won't be until the 2010 moratorium). In the mean time, the 2009/10 maximum salary is used instead.
Contract contains a trade kicker for the lesser of $4,000,000 or 15%. The final year is only 75% guaranteed, but becomes fully guaranteed if any one of the following happens:
1) The team obtains a permanent total disability insurance policy of at least $17,000,000 from an insurance company with an AM Best financial strength rating of A- or better.
2) The team secures insurance coverage under the NBA TTD Program.
3) The team wins the NBA Championship in any of the following seasons: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, or 2013-14.
4) Roy is selected to the NBA All-Star team in at least three of the following seasons: 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, or 2013-14.
5) During the 2013-14 season, Roy plays in at least 55 of the team's regular season games.
6) During the 2013-14 season, Roy's team makes the playoffs and Roy plays in 80% of team's playoff games.
Uncle Cliffy cliffnotes version: Assuming Brandon doesn't violate the terms of his contract by doing something ridiculous and also decides not to opt out of his contract's 5th year, Brandon is set to get 75% of that final year's contract price no matter what. That figure is estimated at roughly $14.4 million. Now, for the additional $4.8 million dollars to be guaranteed in the fifth year, Brandon simply needs to win a title, make 3 all star teams in the first 4 years of his new deal or meet minimum playing time thresholds in the deal's 4th year. He needs to meet only one, not all, of those conditions.
Like we said from the start, $80 million dollar deals simply are not finalized overnight. The provisions outlined above are a nice window into the complexities of this negotiation, which was viewed by some observers as dragging on longer than necessary.
The Blazers were looking to fully take care of Brandon while also protecting themselves as much as possible from financial damage that could result from a catastrophic injury. Brandon wanted to make sure he was getting paid the full amount over five years should the injury occur in the fourth or fifth year after he had already put in some serious work helping the team during his prime.
After the two sides agreed to a five year deal with the early termination option for Brandon, they found themselves forced to compromise on this issue: at what point(s), exactly, will Brandon have contributed enough in the first years of his new deal to fully guarantee the last year of his deal, given that the Blazers would be completely out of luck (and on the hook for millions of dollars) should injury befall him?
That's not an easy question at all. Do teams owe players after the fact for services rendered? Hasn't Brandon "earned" a full guarantee just because he's Brandon? Can you find a fair way to turn the full guarantee into a motivating factor for a player who is about to be see his salary rise astronomically? You can see why it might take awhile to iron out these big-dollar deals and how proposals and counter-proposals between the two sides would take some serious time to digest.
At first glance, it seems that the resolution to these questions, outlined in the terms above, ended up being quite favorable to Brandon. I say that because there is a relatively simple way for him to trigger a full guarantee, one that relies exclusively on previously-demonstrated ability: Brandon only needs to make 3 All-Star games in the first 4 years of his deal. Having already made 2 All-Star games in his first 3 seasons and given that he will be entering his prime once his extension kicks in, meeting this provision seems like a lock; it would likely take 2 long-term injuries (or 1 truly catastrophic injury) during the first four years of his deal to prevent this contract from going fully guaranteed. That is an unlikely scenario and a chance that any athlete, even a superstar in Brandon's situation, can live with.
Putting aside the question of "who won the compromise?", though, the best part of these provisions from a Blazer fan's perspective is the line about winning a ring. A single title removes a $4.8 million dollar question mark from Brandon's life. Even for someone as fully motivated and focused as Brandon, that's some serious extra motivation.
You mean I get to bathe in champagne and guarantee myself almost $5 million dollars on the same night? OK!
Note: this provision isn't exactly a "bonus" payment because it won't be paid until the contract's fifth year and will likely be triggered regardless of whether or not Brandon succeeds in taking Portland to the promised land. But it is a sign that the team is personally incentivizing Brandon Roy for the team's success and, by putting it in writing, it sends a message to Brandon that the team is committed to putting him in a position to meet that provision.
Indeed, I have never doubted Brandon's desire to win a title. However, raised eyebrows are the inevitable result when the organization does something like cash Raef Lafrentz's insurance checks rather than trade him. So it is comforting to see that the team's focus -- even when it comes to the weird minutiae of contract guarantee provisions -- is on adding to the trophy case. At the end of the day, all the talk about building a title-contending team around Brandon has been reinforced by these contract provisions, for all parties involved.
I'm not sure what else Brandon, or Blazers fans, could ask for.
-- Ben (benjamin.golliver@gmail.com)
PS Thanks to Kelly Dwyer for tweeting this to my attention.
37 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
More signs he doesn't want to leave
That isn’t generally something the team asks to have put in, that’s something the player asks for.
So a sign he wants to stay in Portland long term.
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
I love these incentives....
I agree that they will help ensure Roy stays for the life of the contract (and probably beyond). I particularly like the championship provision…..I’m hoping it ends up being sure money.
"I'm a man, but I can change.....if I have to......I guess." - Red Green
That’s not an estimate. Those are the 2009/10 maximum salary figures. Those are what are used until the next year’s ones are calculated.
by Sham-onnnnnnnnnnna on Aug 26, 2009 3:02 PM PDT reply actions
WOW
Way deep stuff. It is amazing the complexities of a big contract. If Roy gets 5 million extra, I wonder what kinda multimillion dollar incentives Lebron, Kobe, Wade, and Howard have. What is the biggest chunk of “bonus” cash a player gets if they win a title? WHich NBA player has the biggest incentive?
The Dude: Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!
by cavejunctionblazer on Aug 26, 2009 3:06 PM PDT reply actions
And what about LaMarcus?
Are his guarantees/incentives tied to what he has accomplished to date, ala Roy’s? Roy is a proven All Star, and likely to continue being an All Star, while LaMarcus still only projects as an All Star.
Does that factor into his guaranteed baseline, with incentives structured to allow him to reap all the benefits of fine play?
I personally love incentive contracts with injury safeguards. Players get what they earn, teams are protected.
It's what LMA thinks he should have that matters
I am of the opinion that LMA – because his ceiling is high but lacks the accomplishments of Roy – should have more money proportioned to incentives than Roy. However, LMA should have the opportunity to achieve the MAX if he can earn it.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 26, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions
LMA's current contract
(his rookie scale deal) is fully guaranteed, as far as I know. Pretty standard for a rookie deal.
He hasn’t signed his extension yet, so what incentives it might include are purely speculative at this point.
Definitely speculation - but as a comparison/contrast to Roy's extension
Since LMA is getting an extension as well, but doesn’t have the accomplishments of Roy, I wonder what flavor the negotiations are taking?
Do we have any context for a player with LMA’s potential signing a long term extension at the same time as a teammate drafted at the same time but getting the max?
I have to believe that two players of this quality taken in the same draft is pretty unique, but I haven’t researched it. Signing both to long term extensions with the same team is probably even more unique, but I haven’t researched that, either.
by blacknoiseNW on Aug 27, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions
Appears now that all those who wanted KP's head for not handing Roy the keys
might be mollified by the Blazers’ commitment to winning as part of the contract – (seems Brandon only has to keep the oil changed to get the car + insurance fully paid).
Kudos Ben – good analysis and nice vocabulary use : incentivizing
I assume you are working with Dave to get your own contract incentivized?
yeah
but it won’t stop the knee jerk reaction from happening again. Just wait two months.
"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.
But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html
We are knee-jerk fans...
It’s in our blood.
"I'm a man, but I can change.....if I have to......I guess." - Red Green
by antediluvian on Aug 26, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Drives us non-knee jerk fans nuts :)
"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.
But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html
Yeah, it certainly explains why
the extension wasn’t signed the day after the Moratorium ended. Sounds like the Blazers wanted to ensure that health issues weren’t going to damage the financial picture in 2014.
Roy should make each of the next 4 all-star games.
He’s got that $4.8M bonus in the bag.
On a side note- how exactly does a trade kicker work?
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
I believe it's just as simple as the player receives a bonus that has been pre-negotiated in his contract if he gets traded.
by dario argento on Aug 26, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, it's like a signing bonus that gets paid when he's traded
And then the amount of the bonus/kicker is prorated among the remaining years of the contract.
To make the All-Star team again...
Roy has to beat out four of these guys:
Kobe, Deron Williams, Tony Parker, Steve Nash, Jason Kidd, Chauncey Billups and Chris Paul.
Assuming the West team takes four guards, which four of these will get left off?
Last year,
all of these guys played in the All star game (plus Roy) except Williams, Nash and Kidd. So they had a 5 guard rotation I guess. But I think the coaches vote in whoever they wish. If I remember correctly, G Mo Williams replaced F Chris Bosh when he got hurt and they obviously don’t play the same position. I think they pick 7 reserves (usually 3 G, 3 F and 1 C). Next year if LMA steps up his game he could easily be voted in by the coaches. David West was voted in last year and I think LMA is a better player than him. I think Roy will definitely be voted on again—he’d definitely beat out Nash, Kidd and Williams. I think he would even beat out Billups if they only went with a 4 guard rotation.
SEE I TOLD YOU!
When everyone was freaking out and complaining about the Brandon Roy contract negotiations, I kept saying that these deals are ridiculously complex and that there were many facets for them to work out….it wasn’t just the Blazers not wanting to pay him or not wanting to give him a 5 year deal….Thank you for illustrating my point!
THIS SHOULD BE A LESSON to everyone freaking out and complaining about the LaMarcus Aldridge signing takinging too long…IT WILL HAPPEN! It just takes a while to get minute details like the ones listed above from the Roy deal worked out.
HAVE FAITH BLAZERDOM!
by rip_city_swagger on Aug 26, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions
Calling out stupidity
is good, and when the evidence is incontrovertible is the best time to do it.
You were right, and the Chicken Littles were being a little bit stupid.
Any Blazer fan who doesn’t like that championship incentive is being silly. And that is the kind of thing that takes time to work through.
By the way, that championship incentive is probably irrelevant to Brandon’s guarantee. Almost certainly, there will be an insurance contract, or he’ll play the required games, or he’ll make the all-star game three times. Or he’ll be good enough that even if (due to injury, perhaps) he doesn’t get the all-star appearances, and he misses too many games in the fourth year, we would still want him for year five, so would not cut him to save $5 million.
I would say it is probably about 95% probable that Brandon gets the full amount even if we don’t win a championship. So why is that little clause important? Because it sends a message to every single player on the team and around the league. That message?
1. We are going for the absolute top, and are absolutely committed to winning it all.
2. Paul Allen is ready to pay the bill to make that happen.
To our current roster, it says, “Earn the pay check by being good enough to help us win it all, and you’ll get the pay check. Money isn’t an issue here.”
To players around the league, it says, “We’re going for the top. If you want a ring, Portland is the place to be.”
"if Nate has Roy or Miller in the game at all times, that stagnation will turn into conflagration" -- two4larue
by jscot on Aug 26, 2009 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is "incentivizing"
a real word? Can we flag him for using that?
This is, after all, a familyizing blog.
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
It is not "familyizing"
it should be “familioid”
"I'm tired" -Me
by 92wastheyear on Aug 26, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
...interesting...
Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin
my last.fm
Well talk and words are cheap
lets get expensive and play ball and watch BRoy earn a fat pay check
I just can’t wait to watch it happen.
hg
I think it's sad that Brandon has to have money
as a motivation to win the title.
"Put your drawers on, and take your gun off."
I'm hoping your kidding
SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.
I'm pretty sure...
he doesn’t use money as a motivation to win a title. I think the money is just a “bonus”.
lol
"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.
But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html

by 






















