How Far, How Fast?
So...if you listened to yesterday's podcast (the post right below) you heard Gavin Dawson explain his reasoning for thinking the Blazers could make the NBA Finals this year. No fuss, no muss, no waiting in line. With the season approaching fast it seems like time to address that topic, so let's throw it open.
Assume that the lineup through most of the season will be as you see it today. There is probably a move left somewhere in the first half of the season but we don't know what that will be yet so we can't forecast that into our discussion. How far do you expect the Blazers to go this season?
A big issue for me is the seed Portland is able to grab. If the Blazers are in the top four again I expect they'd get to the second round. They're not likely to be ambushed again as they were in Game 1 of last year's Houston series. That moment swayed the proceedings in so many ways. The Blazers should be able to defend the homecourt and vanquish at least one opponent, no matter who that opponent may be.
I think the Blazers have a reasonable chance of grabbing the division title, undoubtedly the easiest way to ensure a good bracket position. Failing that the worries come less from who's in front than who's behind. Dallas and New Orleans are the teams to watch. Both have picked up new players whom they hope will return them to near-elite status. I'm not sure that will work for either squad, but if one of them catches lightning in a bottle the Blazers could be in for a rougher fight than many assume.
Nevertheless, a series win is the clear goal with the Conference Finals being a possibility. I don't believe the team has enough experience either in absolute or playoff terms to dethrone the L*kers, especially since Portland would almost certainly lack homecourt advantage in that matchup. So the ride would probably end whenever those two teams met. Any other upper-echelon Western Conference opponent I'd give the Blazers a chance against...maybe not an even chance exactly, but enough of one to sustain hope.
Failing to grab a top seed would be disappointing and bowing out in the first round again would be a setback. This team has not yet failed to reach any reasonable goal to which they set their minds. I wouldn't want to see them start this year.
What are your thoughts on the matter? How far do you expect the Blazers to go, understanding that expectations are distinct from hopes and wishes? Weigh in below.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
186 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What I expect: second round, make it to game 7…
What I hope: WCF against Lakers…
A bit too hopeful: a finals appearance…
A pipe dream this year: NBA Championship…
if the blazers make it out of the west
WHY would it be a pipe dream to beat the east? If blazers > spurs/lakers I’m feeling pretty comfortable that the blazers will be > boston, cavs.
"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.
But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html
Sure maybe, but thats still a stretch IMO.
I just didn’t want to get technical with “what if” and “buts”
In a seven game series id say boston takes the blazers but with cleveland, we can take them out. Ala Magic last year…
I disagree with your position on Boston
This team is not the team that can simply be intimidated into a loss. KG is the biggest ‘all bark, no bite’ dog in the league. I think if he tried that, again, the most it would bring is a bunch of laughs from this very confident Blazers team. IF (capital if) they were to somehow make it to the finals, I think their best shot would be against Boston, then Orlando. I’m not sure I’d want to face a rejuvenated Shaq and James in a 7 game series….unless we had home court.
My expectations: WCF
"Stay humble. Stay hungry"
I think they have the focus and the experience to make a real run. It seems like many of last year’s playoff teams have had sizable changes to their rotation players. It could be a whole buffet of goodness.
by FrederickT1 on Aug 13, 2009 11:58 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Time to dream big. The window is open.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
by timbo on Aug 14, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 5 recs
Yes, and the dream is not unreasonable...
I don’t think I can be completely objective , and there is no question that a lot of things can go wrong. But I much prefer letting others elucidate the possible pittfalls. I am delighted that it is not wildly inconceivable that Gavin could be right, and as a fan I am happy to embrace the dream. Welcome on board Clyde ! I look for the team to maintain its resolve, to congeal into a tight fighting unit, to be widely respected as a contender. We have the pieces. I have not been so excited about a season in a long time, and it does matter to me a lot that I personally like the players, and organization, as well as respect their playing ability and promise.
I think I will be happy this year if we stay healthy, and, if we loose a playoff series, it is because the other team beat our best effort, with no quit in us – that we don’t go down easy, we go down HARD.
It should be fun.
RT: We have the pieces
For regular season success, yes. Unless there’s an injury to one of the 3 main big men
The final piece for injury “insurance” and playoff readiness is a 4th veteran big man
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Aug 14, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
There is absolutely no reason
That they do not have the best record in the west and the number 1 seed in the west.
Aim for a championship
But I’d settle for winning a series this year.
"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely
I expect showing up to the second round
Who knows maybe we will be the team that catches lightning in a bottle. I think we would have an equal chance as other teams to make it to the WCF. If they don’t make the WCF I would be disappointed but not the end of the world disappointed. For this team not to make it passed the first round would be bad.
Of all the best teams Portland is the most difficult to project
No other team has the combination of youth, talent, and success (yes 54 wins is success). The growth of the younger players GO, Rudy, and Batum figure to enhance our team more than any changes ANY other team made in the entire NBA.
The addition of Miller to the starting line up has the potential to do for us what Billups did for Denver last year. With Roy’s drive and Aldridge’s talent we are looking at a very special year. We will win our division and IF the L*kers have any issue at all I say we pass them out right and go the finals this year. Once there …well who knows. Its time for the Red and Black to crash the Party!
O.R.
16 wins
Sorry, but 8 wins means they will be swept in the conference finals and I just can’t accept that. 6 wins, 7 wins, maybe. Or 10 or 11. 8 wins makes me a little sick, though.
Everybody was a baby once, Arthur. Oh, sure, maybe not today, or even yesterday. But once. Babies, chum: tiny, dimpled, fleshy mirrors of our us-ness, that we parents hurl into the future, like leathery footballs of hope. And you've got to get a good spiral on that baby, or evil will make an interception.
I'd be pleased if they made the WCF
A sweep would suck there, but it would still be the Final Four.
I want a first round win
If we lose to the eventual conference champions that’s the only way I’d be okay with a 1st round exit this year.
"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder
Position doesn't matter in the West
Home court is nice and match-ups matter. But setting yourself up the best way you often comes down to luck. And home court is not a universal panacea. It just makes things easier.
The Western Conference Finalist will have faced at least two really tough teams. It is about being ready for playoff intensity and getting to the playoffs rested.
I agree that the finals are a possibility. A lot of this depends on Oden’s development and how effective Miller is on this team. I hope that Nate has the team better rested this year.
by LaoTzu on Aug 14, 2009 1:13 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Its simply scary how far they could go
First this team, as it stands has the POTENTIAL to make the finals [Sure a small move or two would help, but teams have made it to the finals with less than a 100% perfect makeup]. But do I want to set my hopes up so high and suffer heartbreak, or should I protect myself, target low and be “pleasantly surprised”?
How many of us really expected 54 wins at the start of last year? Even though we thought we would be getting a great Oden back, and Martell too. We still didn’t dream of 54 wins. [We didn’t know much about Rudy, and nothin about Batum]. This year, we’re right back there again, but worse.We’re anticipating an improved Oden, Martell’s return and Miller+Blake as our PGs; we know about Batum and Rudy; and we were a 54 win team. How high do you want us to dream, Dave?
We were blowing out teams at the end of last year. I’m not expecting anything, but I’m hoping that we blow out teams from the outset. That even before we get to the playoffs, we become a team that is feared. I’m hoping that we beat LA on their home court. That the league sees us as capable of beating anybody on any floor. With all the Injuries bug-a-boos, I’m just too nervous to expect anything. But I am HOPING that even FromAfar this is a fantastic season to remember.
Also dont know what an offseason of rust does to this team
But if we continue the new season where we left off last years regular season — improving our seeding from last year, that is becoming top3 in west will be automatic. Still we had an Achilles heel against teams like Houston, Dallas, and funnily Golden State. Houston wont hurt us so bad, and I think that Marion instead of Bass will actually make Dallas easier for us to handle.
My biggest wish is that we gain maturity over the year, to imprint our style of ball against whoever becomes our new Achilles heel. If we indeed show this maturity, then WCF here we come, baby. And finals, with a little luck.
I think
The re-addition of Marty, Greg’s continued (hopefully injury-free) development and the addition of Andre will help us greatly with regard to Houston, Dallas and GS. Plus w/out Yao (and with McGrady), Houston becomes a much more favorable matchup.
by DonkeyShins on Aug 14, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Will have to go and listen
to what gavin had to say, but I get to possibility, not yet probably, of finals like this: on any given night they can beat any team in the league. They could last year when they were hot. They’ll do it this year when they just play their game.
I would not be surprised at a very deep playoff run as I felt LA was lucky to not have to go through Portland AND avoid Yao. I think the Blazers will improve more than LA this year, but those potential improvements, while numerous, will still have to play out. Yet, if they hit their stride, especially Oden, there is no top to their potential. This year. Look at the list of serious up-side other teams could only dream about – Oden, Aldridge, Rudy, Batum, Web-Mart, Bayless. And Miller is ALL upside.
The Blazers this year will be a special team. They have a mix and depth of talent and their heads on straight. Can they step up this year from boys to men? I wouldn’t want to bet against them. If you can get long odds, at least you have a legitimate shot at a dark-horse winner.
I can’t think of another team I would rather own for the next five years.
As to seeding, I think that is less important than team and player development. Sure, wins and HCA matter but there are going to have to be experiments and new plays, so it might take them a while to try out all the parts and settle into a groove. Counter-intuitive and 1984-like, but Less Wins=Deeper Playoffs, at least for the Blazer’s current situation.
Yet, I suspect they will surprise us all with how they mesh and wins won’t be an issue and the playing time distribution will come from solid wins. Its not that I don’t want wins (regular season), its just not the most important concern. Can they stay focused and in control and execute plays and get quality shots and defend tough and smart?
I (hope to) see them running hard and going 10 deep; they can run other teams ragged, then dunk on their face. I don’t want no run-and-gun. I want run-and-pound.
ARE WE THERE YET?
WCF
As far as I’m concerned, LA is still the team to beat in the West. They will get the No. 1 seed. Portland will get the 2 or the 3. The Spurs added Jefferson and McDyess, which makes them extremely dangerous. If Duncan and Ginobili stay healthy, they take the No. 2 spot. However, that is a very big IF given Duncan’s age and Ginobili’s injury history. If they run into those problems, I believe the Blazers are next in line for the No. 2 seed. Regardless, I think they will win the Northwest division. We technically tied with Denver for it this year, and we had a far better offseason than they did. Adding Miller and also having a healthy Martell and an improving Batum/Oden/Bayless on what was already a 54-win team is big. Denver didn’t make any big acquisitions and lost Klezia and Jones. They’ll still be dangerous if their core guys can stay healthy all year, but they lost some depth while we gained some. This in my mind makes us the favorites to win the NW. I think we will get to the conference finals and lose to LA in 6 games. We got a lot better this offseason but we’re still not as good as the Lakers, and they would obviously have home court in this series, meaning that barring a Kobe injury the Blazers wouldn’t have much chance. However, I am hopeful that NEXT year we’re talking appearing in the finals, possibly winning it.
Denver
In my opinion is going to be running tight with us all year again for the NW. I think as you said we made more gains, while they made a few minor losses, but I still expect every game against them to be extremely important. I think however, that we have more growth potential and it will be interesting to see as the season comes closer whether it is us or denver who is projected to win the NW by the talking heads(not that it really matters, but will be interesting to read about). Can the season just be here already??
by oregonsportsaddict on Aug 14, 2009 3:00 AM PDT up reply actions
If I had to bet, I'd say a WCF loss to the Lakers is most likely
But I’m not “hurryup’09” for nothing. I’ve long felt that the Blazers’ championship window opens in the ‘09-’10 season. The ’09 Blazers are every bit as promising as the ’76 Blazers were, in my opinion. The Blazers are as likely to “capture lightning in a bottle” as any other dark horse out there.
The Lakers are the only truly imposing obstacle, and they’re one injury away from being eminently beatable. Sorry, but I had to point that out…
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I couldn't handle a WCF loss to the Lakers.
My year would be ruined.
I want to put points on your face.-Rudy Fernandez
It would beat a second round loss to the Spurs
and then having the L@kers beat the Spurs.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I believe
That they’ll win the division and end up with the 3 seed behind LA and San Antonio. Winning the first round will give them a 2nd round matchup with San Antonio, one they should be able to win. Duncan will be worn down again by a whole season, and it’s possible the same could happen to Manu. After beating the spurs 4-2 in the 2nd round they will run into the Lakers in the WCF. This is when the rubber meets the road, and I’m not sure how much of a chance we’ll have. The Lakers are nothing but better, and while the same can be said for us I don’t think we will have closed the gap. It will take a significant leap from Oden and Batum as well as meaningful and reliable contribution from Webster to get us to the Laker’s level. We lose the WCF, whetting our appetite for next year.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
This sounds about right
although we have more unknowns than the fakers. Our potential upside is probably the biggest in the league. If we make it to the WCF, our season is a huge success.
I dunno if we can beat the Spurs in a 7 game series
Sure, we are much younger, but A) the Spurs have unquestionably been there before and B) there is a massive difference between “Regular Season Timmy” and “Playoff Timmy.” I’d favor the Spurs against us in the playoffs, though wouldn’t be shocked if we won in 6 or 7 games.
Nice article
I thought your article was very unbiased. It is very refreshing compared to some of the homer crap i’ve read all over the Internet. The blazers in my book still lack the interior presence needed during the playoffs. In the playoffs you need someone who, when the other team goes on runs, perhaps on the road, someone who can catch the ball in the post and get you a high quality shot.
It seems to me that post offense is by far the most predictable offense. That is, you’ll always basically get the same performance. It’s not the type of position that production varies much on the road vs at home. Thus in the playoffs, it is of utmost importance.
Portland still lacks this presence. Until they get it, or at least more of it, they won’t get over the hump. Last year’s lakers went into the post like 70% of possessions. Whether it was Pau Gasol, Bynum, Odom or perhaps their most productive post player, Kobe. The ball was always in the post. This is one huge advantage they had over other teams.
Boston the year before had KG who has an incredible offensive game, especially in the post. The high release is impossible to block.
The Spurs in their championship years had Tim Duncan.
The Lakers in their 3-peet had Shaq, the most dominant big man ever.
The Heat in their 1 win had an older Shaq
by plyka on Aug 14, 2009 2:02 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
The Blazers need a post presence, Nate called that hypothetical player a “beast”
Oden could become that, with improved leg strength and balance. LMA has had success in the post, but Yao neutralized LMA in the Houston series. No Ming this year
But “one more veteran big man” is a necessity, to guard against injury and inevitable foul trouble. KP needs to flip Outlaw+capspace for a banger and the playoff roster will be set
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Oden
Well I like LMA a lot better than Oden on offense. LMA has shown incredibly promise. I think his problem with Yao is more one of experience. Since Yao is so tall you need to use different moves in the post. You’re not going to back him down and then shoot over him. YOu should probably face him and attempt to use your quickness. LMA will learn this kind of stuff with age I think.
Oden on the other hand hasn’t shown me anything yet on offense. Offense is also where a lot of talent shows up early —soft touch, great interior passing, nice shot, etc. So I can see Oden improving tremendously and becoming an inside force on offense. But it’ll be more rebounding and putbacks, close shots, etc, offense rather than skill offense. He’ll never be a Pau Gasol or KG or Tim Duncan, etc, on offense because he just doesn’t have that skill set. But he could definitely improve tremendously and become a force.
The blazers just seem to me like a meal with all the right ingredients —except the chef hasn’t figured out how to prepare the ingredients to make a world class meal yet. They are still lacking “something.” Just not there yet. But, these type of things just appear one season, so next season could be the one.
I think this is mostly right
Oden is unlikely to ever be those guys you mention.
If he is an offensive force (and I think he will be) it won’t be because of those skills. It will be the baby jump hook, the quick step around his man for a dunk, etc.
One thing he has showed us is a nice passing touch at times. That also can be a great weapon, if you are a threat to score down low, because it increases the chance of avoiding the double teams — if you pass out of the double team for an easy bucket every time, they just can’t do it.
The only thing I disagree on this is the implication that Oden won’t have “skill offense”. Skills can be learned. But Greg is unlikely to learn the sklls of a Pau because it would be silly for a player of his type to try to become like Pau.
Greg needs to develop about three consistent low post moves, and eventually a nice face-up 10 foot jumper. That and continue to work on his passing.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
RT: I think his problem with Yao is more one of experience.
LMA got his shot blocked early in game 1 by Yao who came over to help Scola on a double team. I think that strategy surprised LMA and got into his head, for awhile. Rather than use his back-to-the-basket moves he stepped out and faced up, instead. LMA had a decent series against the Rockets and he will be able to score down low on most teams, but he will also need to learn how to pass out of double-teams better and “give up the post” to Oden when the two are on the floor together. I don’t see that being a problem, LMA has nice range on his jumper.
I also think Miller will help get easier baskets to all the Blazer big men, I just don’t think a 3-big-man rotation is going to be “enough” to make it through the playoffs and that a 4th veteran big man needs to be added, prefereably someone who can make10-15 foot jumpers consistently, because he’ll be matched up with Joel/Greg most of the time
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Outlaw
shouldn’t be traded. I’m tired of all the Outlaw haters. He’s a team player and a big part of the chemistry of the team. If we are hot to trade someone who thinks totally about himself first, then trade Rudy. He’s alot of fun to watch when his game is on, but it’s all about him. Outlaw doesn’t understand why everyone hates on him. Believe all that I’m posting here. I’ve heard it from an inside source.
team players learn how to defend
Yes, we already knew that Travis has friends who read the blogs and report back what is written about him, so what?
If he wants to stay in Portland he should concentrate on the defensive rotations that Nate and Monty have been trying to teach him, for years. The other players known where to be and who they should be guarding, what’s Outlaw’s problem with these concepts? How about some rebounds? Dante Cunningham will be beating #25 to loose balls as soon as training camp starts
(and you can tell him I said so)
Some people can’t seperate legitimate criticsm from “hate”. It’s a PC world
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
"Will We Make the Finals" is the wrong question
The right question is, “What would have to happen for us to make the Finals?”
Possibility #1 — we have great chemistry right away, and enough of our young players make major strides forward that we end up the #1 seed. I put that at a 20% possibility. If we’re a #1 seed, I put our chances of making the Finals at probably about 30 to40%. Net: 6 to 8% chance.
Possibility #2 — we make good progress this year and are good enough for a solid #2 seed, but the L@kers implode due to A) Artest head case B) Bryant head case or C) Catastrophic Injury. We end up the #1 seed, as above. I put his at about a 10% chance, and again about 30 to 40% chance of making the Finals if it happens. Net: 3 to 4% chance.
Possibility #3 — we make good progress, end up as the #2 seed, and get enough breaks in the playoffs to advance even without the #1 seed. I’d put this as about a 10% chance.
Possibility #4 — we aren’t good enough to make a #1 or #2 seed, but catch lightning in a bottle, put it all together in the playoffs, and advance. I’d give that about a 2 to 3% chance.
All told, our chances of making the Finals are somewhere between 20 and 25%. The talent is there, but it isn’t fully developed yet, offensively or defensively. We aren’t a well-oiled machine yet, and we don’t have experience.
The talent could possibly develop quickly, the chemistry could come together, and teams do very well in the playoffs without a lot of experience sometimes.
I wouldn’t bet on Portland making the Finals. They are not likely to do so. But the percentage possibility is high enough that it isn’t stupid to talk about it. In all probability, we need the L@kers to stumble one way or another, but good teams stumble (look at Boston’s injuries last year).
And we may need San Antonio to stumble as well, but no one knows whether they will be healthy come playoff time. If they have injury problems again this year, they could even end up with a 4 or 5 seed, and face the L@kers in the second round. Wouldn’t that be fun?
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
statistics don't really work like that
You can’t simply add up the Net percentages in your scenerios and come to a sum (20%-25%). If that was the case, then all you’d need to do is think up a few extra scenarios and you could increase the percentage, lol.
Since the scenarios are all mutually exclusive
it does work like that.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Obvioulsy you are not aware that statistics do whatever jscot tells them to do.
Jscot, pay no attention to the riff raff. The rest of us understand how you got the correct percentage.
Additionally the same percentage can be derived in another manner. Portland is one of 4, maybe 5 best teams in the west (Portland, LA, SA, Denver and either Dallas, NO or Utah). That gives us a 20 – 25% chance.
hakkaa päälle !
Agree with your point (the % not so much)
Probably have to have the #1 seed to beat LA in the WCFs. In a 7 game series the best team is probably going to win. I think there is a 10-20% chance of matching or beating the L*kers in the regular season. Let’s be the best team and then make it to the finals. I don’t buy into being the inferior team then lucking into some “lightning in a bottle”. Yes, I know lower seeds have won series. I’ll still like my chances when we have the better team.
by 52therim on Aug 14, 2009 7:25 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
That's a great scenario. Imagine the angst in LakerLand
if they had to face Portland with home-court advantage in a playoff series. Makes me giggle.
"Probably have to have the #1 seed to beat LA in the WCFs"
Agreed. I put a pretty low probability on us winning without the #1 seed.
Remember, the 77 team swept LA, the #1 seed, just because they put it all together and were red-hot at the right time. It’s always possible. Low probability, but possible.
It’s also possible that the #1 seed has a key injury at a bad time. Again, not a real high probability, but it happens.
But yes, we probably would need the #1 seed to beat them.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Oh, and regarding this
I don’t buy into being the inferior team then lucking into some "lightning in a bottle".
1. I wasn’t saying I wanted it to be that way. I’d much rather dominate all year.
2. It could happen that way.
3. I won’t complain if it does.
4. If it happens, it probably won’t be because we are “inferior”, it will be because we were progressing throughout the year, and not good enough to battle for the top seed at the start of the year — but manage to peak at the right time.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Anything is possibuulllll
But I expect the Lakers, Spurs to stand in the way. Nuggets, Jazz, Mavs, Hornets also all have a chance to be a stumbling block. Power ranking rather than standing (barring injury, the Blazers are also not as deep as it seems on all positions):
1. Lakers: Best in the West
2. Spurs: Don’t care much about regular season and might start slow resting Duncan, but will turn it up in the playoffs
3. Blazers: Improved, but still some experience or an upgraded piece away
4. Nuggets: About steady from last season, though the novelty wears off
5. Mavericks: Improved, but likely not enough improved before they ship Dampier for an upgrade
6. Jazz: Dangerous when all on board
7. Hornets: Trapped between contending and saving, weak wings
8. The rest: A mystery
"I'm addicted to polo y'all...respect my fresh" - Travis25Outlaw
P.S.: Fans of all franchises are optimistic before the season, within their limits. Lakers fans only talk about who will be their opponent in the finals. Warriors fans think they’ll make the playoffs. Thunder will break out. Even the rebuilding Suns fans dream.
Suns finish second in the Pacific
Record: 50-32,
6th Seed, Make the playoffs, out in first round
…
Biggest Surprise: No significant injuries-Channing Frye is go to guy when STAT Sun Tzu gets into foul trouble, and feeling comfortable, has the best season of his career.
http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2009/8/13/988870/your-2009-10-suns-predictions
"I'm addicted to polo y'all...respect my fresh" - Travis25Outlaw
Channing is a great go-to guy when ya need to go-to a 25 foot jumpshot...
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
The spurs didn't turn it up in the last playoffs...
I believe Dallas whooped their old, tired butts.
Manu was out
No one thinks they are dangerous if injuries zap them again.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
A succesful season for me will be...
Getting to the second round. I really feel that they have a realistic chance to make the Western Conference Finals. I think that they still need to prove that they can win against good teams on the road, but I think they can.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Jimi Hendrix
by philly420pdxhilo on Aug 14, 2009 2:44 AM PDT reply actions
There for the taking
Anything short of the WCF will be a dissapointment.
Everyone on our team is in their prime and improving. The rest of the West is just getting older.
We should be able to handle everyone. The Lakers will have to keep their old bodies healthy and play their best to hang with us.
A dirty mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Age isn't really an argument for the Blazers. The prime for NBA players doesn't begin at 22.
Blake and Joel are in their prime. Travis and Brandon are entering it. The rest is before it. The roster is full of sophomores that the Blazers have to rely on for major minutes. And the West isn’t really getting too old, they are adding younger players too. Some teams feel older – or younger – than they are. Average age as of now:
Mavericks: 28.3
Spurs: 28
Lakers: 27
Rockets: 27
Hornets: 27
Nuggets: 26.8
Suns: 26.3
Clippers: 26.2
Wolves: 25.9
Jazz: 25.4
Warriors: 25.2
Blazers: 24.6
Kings: 24.5
Thunder: 23.8
Grizzlies: 23.8
"I'm addicted to polo y'all...respect my fresh" - Travis25Outlaw
Thank god for Andre Miller, eh?
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
I'd like to see one more veteran PF
bump that average up into the 25-26 range
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
You didn't want Millsap?
He would have kept it low….
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I would've loved Millsap
I even came up with an elaborate rotation to make sure he got 25+ minutes a game, with LMA hypothetically playing “SF” for 6 minutes a half
But ideally I’d rather have a veteran PF because of experience and because young veterans in the 24-29 year-old age range (David Lee, etc) are going to be more concerned about getting regular minutes. An older vet will be happier to play “as needed” then conserve his energy for “big games” and the playoffs, when he will be most needed
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I'm happy as long
as no one gets arrested,
or gets fat, as long as I don’t get insulted as a fan,
as long as none of them drive yellow hummers,
gets caught on 82nd (bayless can get a pass he needs to release some stress),
as long as they don’t answer “both teams playd hard”,
as long as none of them use their playing card as an ID,
or throws a towel at SABAS
or hits my boy HA,
as long as they know not to smuggle pot w/tinfoil (tape it to your leg in an airtight bag or eat a condom full of it duh) and finally as long as no one has to turn a leaf or leaves over. I will be happy.
and for seattle fans:
as long as I have a team….. srry…
its a blessing to have this team be my team….. our team..
by FrenchToast on Aug 14, 2009 4:13 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
It isn't something we should take for granted though
"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder
Let me cop out...
How Far, How Fast?
Who knows? It’s the time of year that fans like,- need,-( nothing else much to do), speculate as to these things.
Seems to me the goals are relatively obvious. Remain a playoff team, this time advance in the playoffs. How obtainable are these goals? Really who knows?
Given health, and a reasonable chemistry, this team is clearly playoff talented. But health and team chemistry are not givens. They are assumable, so let’s assume a generally healthy season for most of our primaries, for most of the season and heading into the playoffs. Also, this team was assembled with an eye to character, and McMillan seems to be very good at keeping a team focused. So we can also assume a good team character/chemistry Reportedly these guys get along well.
I’m coping out on exactly what is possible, only because so much of how much better we may or may not be depends on the development/return of players we already have. Who can predict? Webster is a huge wild card. Can he stay healthy? On a team with Batum, Fernandez and Outlaw what is his role, how much does he contribute?
There is almost this unwritten, unspoken agreement within the Blazer Nation that we don’t put “extra” pressure on Oden. But there will be pressure on Oden. He was a #1,-#1 pick and highly touted. We drafted him over Durant because supposedly Oden was that “difference” maker. A “championship” level difference maker. Much has happened to Oden since being drafted, much which was not his fault. But this upcoming season is perhaps pivotal in defining what Oden can or will become. Can Oden stay healthy? What level of contribution will Oden provide? Is it going to be a season of double doubles for Oden, or a season of troubles? An abstract barometer of how well The Blazers are doing might have to be Odens smile. If Oden is smiling by mid-season, then my guess is The Blazers and their fans are having fun and things are going well. If we have a return to the sullen, quiet, brooding Oden who is struggling….I think this team can still win and be an competitor but we might want to temper any dreams of a finals trip.
Throw in Andre Miller, who on paper seems like a great addition, Depend mostly on development of players we have, and pre-season it certainly seems we are poised to take our place among the N.B.A. elite, BUT nothing is given. If The Blazers deserve it, they’ll have to go take it.
In short, it’s VERY nice to be involved in a off season where the focus of the discussions about The Blazers mostly center around how good can we be as opposed to an off season where the discussion is either about off the court antics and happenings, or about clawing our way to medicocrity. Last season we proved we have improved, we reached our goal of returning to Playoff contention. The next rung on the ladder is a hard one, it should be a great season.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
My Only Hope
is that when the Blazers do lose, that we can look at the series and say that they played well. I do not mind a disappointing first round loss IF the collective wisdom is that they were beat by a team that was just playing better. And by well I mean that there is improvement by all of the Blazers, which I expect. I also expect the Blazers to show more dominance as the season goes on.
That said, I think all of the Blazers will improve because of experience and the addition of Miller. I would not be surprised if they are able to make the Finals, but do not think that it is realistic to expect it.
One thing that strikes me as a little unrealistic is the 60 win wagon. Last year they had an insane number of quality opponents coming in off of the second night of a back to back and won almost all of them. This coming year, not so much. I think a 54 win season will be an improvement because of that. Jscot has the most excellent statistics to back that up as I recall.
www.sumnerlawpc.com
www.CenterForVetRights.com
The strength of schedule
overall this year is much lower than last year. We had some brutal stretches.
"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder
The back to back schedule is not favorable this year
We play more back to backs than last year, and we play a lot fewer teams who are on a back to back.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Why's everyone in such a hurry?
Considering we got blown away in the first round last season, I’m ok with getting to the second round. I would obviously like farther than that but I’d rather set modest expectations and be pleasantly surprised than get way ahead of myself and be disappointed.
Blazer Fan
Blown away? Did you stop watching after game 1?
We were 1 made bucket or stop away from winning game 3 or 4. Either one of those games could have gone our way and forced a game 7 at the RG.
by 52therim on Aug 14, 2009 7:09 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
But isn't that sort of the point?
We absolutely choked that game away. Couldn’t grab a rebound to save our lives and offense was Roy 1-on-5. That game exploited our weaknesses more than game one.
The series exposed our weakness...Yes. Choked?...No. Blown away?...Still no.
To say we choked doesn’t give Houston enough credit. If Yao doesn’t get injured, who knows if that series against the L*kers turns out differently? They definitely executed better down the stretch. They did that to teams on their home floor all season.
by 52therim on Aug 15, 2009 6:35 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I guess you could call it a choke
IIRC Portland had a double-digit lead early in the 4th quarter of game 4. Then they surrendered multiple offensive rebounds to the Rockets going down the stretch and lost by a point
It wasn’t an epic fail like the ’91 or ’00 WCF meltdowns, but the Houston series basically “swung” on that quarter
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I'm in a hurry
because I hate to see Roy (and all the rest of them) run the 82-game gauntlet, get the crap beat out of him (them) all season long, and come out empty-handed. – Elgin
Without you out there, we're nowhere here
They come out empty-handed
except for the several million dollars they get paid, that is.
"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder
Schedule is Favorable
We won 54 games last year with a horrifically tough schedule and 1 year less experience. We also got the worst first round matchup we could’ve received by playing Houston (up to the final game of the regular season the most likely opponent by far would’ve been the hobbled Spurs), as typically seeding DOES help get a favorable matchup and a favorable matchup, of course, greatly increases the chance for winning a series or two.
The schedule is very favorable – distribution of road-home games each month is pretty good, the start to the season is much easier than last year, only two 5-game roadies and no 6-gamers (and in those two roadies we only play 2 playoff teams from last season on the first trip and 1 on the second trip), we usually play the Lakers four times but this season only three times and twice at HOME, we often play S.A. four times but this season only three times and twice at HOME, so there are many, many favorable elements to the schedule. I could go on and on.
A 41-41 team or a lottery team need not concern themselves overly much with the schedule. But a 54-win team can definitely pick up a few wins based on schedule alone and ensure itself a stronger seed in the playoffs. So, in addition to the expected improvement of GO, Aldridge, Roy, Rudy and Batum and the return of Webster (not even counting any improved contribution from Bayless), we should have more ORGANIC growth than any other team. This doesn’t even include the addition of Miller – as I wanted to focus primarily on the schedule to add something new to the comment mix.
Follow me on Twitter @BlazersInsider
back to backs
are much less favorable this year.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
RT: up to the final game of the regular season the most likely opponent by far would’ve been the hobbled Spurs
Correct, “if” Portland had won 1 more game (or if Denver had lost 1 more…) the Blazers would’ve had the Nuggets “road” to the WCF. Beating Dallas would’ve been a hurdle, but otherwise the Blazers could’ve potentially reached the WCF, last May
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
would've been a good series
the Blazers were playing better at the end of the season as compared to earlier, when they lost to the Mavs. If Portland had faced (and beaten) the Spurs in round 1, their confidence and momentum might have carried them past Dallas, as well
it would’ve been nice to have the opportunity, but that last game of the season (when San Antoino beat NOLA, that forced the dreaded matchup with the Rockets) was the Blazer’s downfall
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
We wouldn't have played Dallas though unless they beat Denver.
New Orleans would have taken the 6th seed in this hypothetical scenario with the extra win, and they played like a lottery team leading into the playoffs (and played like a lottery team for the most part once they reached the playoffs).
Dallas owned us
Well, sort of.
They beat us all three games. That would fit with what you say.
But the first was on Christmas Day beating a tired and worn down team that just wasn’t ready for the kind of grind we had in the first third of the season. A “young team” loss. They happen, I’m not sure that says anything about relative team strength.
The second was a five point loss in Dallas when Blake was out. We struggled with Blake out last year — we lost the next one in OKC.
The third was in Portland, immediately after a very emotional win against the L@kers when Rudy got hammered by Ariza. Again, a young team let down after an emotional win.
All credit to Dallas, they did what they had to do, and they took advantage of the situations to book three wins against us. They were a veteran professional team who came to play.
But I don’t think those three games were indicative of what would have happened in a playoff series.
Terry and Barea were a tough matchup for us last year. But Dallas was not as tough of a matchup for us as Houston.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
RT: But Dallas was not as tough of a matchup for us as Houston.
Right. Even though the Blazers were 1-2 against Houston (versus 0-3 against the Mavs) during the regular season, I still dreaded the Rockets matchup, because of Yao, and because Artest/Battier played the best perimeter defense against Roy. Portland also lost a late-season game down in Houston and I remember thinking to myself “we better get home court advantage if we have to face these guys and then we can’t afford to lose any playoff games at the RG”
(and then, when Dwight Jaynes predicted Portland would win in 5 games, I knew they were goners…)
Tthe Rockets hadn’t gotten out of the first round in Yao’s career, so they had extra motivation
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Given that the Rockets beat us in that series,
I would prefer, in hindsight, that we had played any of the other West playoff teams, including Dallas and L.A. Still, it was a great learning experience for our guys — the Rockets really showed them how it’s done.
That series was our “paying your dues” time. Next spring, we get to enjoy some membership benefits.
I agree
they may have learned more from the Rockets series then they would’ve blasting San Antonio in the first round, but I’m sure the players would’ve preferred to advance, if given the opportunity. Roy was pretty tired, though, probably due to Artest and Battier. I’m not sure how much Brandon had left in this tank, if they had made it throught o round 2. Hopefully Roy will get more rest with Miller around and have more in “reserve” next May
I also hope that KP learned his lesson. Standing pat at the trading deadline and not updating the starting PG and backup PF positions (when he had RLEC and Sergio/Frye/etc to offer) was shortsighted (and it’s not hindsight, I sad this at the time) Hinrich and Miller were available back then, plus any number of bangers. With Kirk and a better backup PF they might have gotten past Houston, even as good as the Rockets were playing
but we’ll never know. I’ve just had enough of watching Blazer teams go “one-round-and-out” during the last 30+ years. It’s tough to see the roster flaws beforehand and then watch them get exposed when the games count the most. Being “right” doesn’t make me feel any better, just more frustrated when I hear all the “they’ll be fine, just let it bake” sentiment
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I thought they had a shot at making the WCF this last season.
And if they had, they might have won it.
This year? My only real expectation is that they make the playoffs. After that it’s a crap shoot, as we have no idea of the matchup, of injuries, or anything else.
What I think is possible? Representing the WC in the NBA Finals.
Assuming Portland stays relatively healthy, I think they are the best team in the west. And that’s without any appreciable improvement by any of our players. If Martell can contribute and the 4 “rookies” from last season show even a small improvement, teams will be fearing the Blazers. They will view road games to the Rose Garden as a ticket to the slaughterhouse. Make no mistake – this is no homerish over enthuisiastic prediction – the Portland Trailblazers are the most talented team in the west and if they integrate Andre Miller into the fold and maintain the chemistry they had from the last part of the season, they will make the rest of the league stand up and notice. (Or more likely, tuck their collective tails between their legs and slink away.)
hakkaa päälle !
This isn't true for every team.
But for the Blazers, it’s true this year:
Seeding matters.
Jscot (as usual) laid it out well above, but if we get the number 1 seed (a big if) I think we’re a shoo-in for WCF with a chance for a finals appearance. A number 2 seed is possible, as the Spurs haven’t been as concerned about regular season success as other teams. Still, Denver has a good shot at beating us out there. But with a two seed, we have a good chance to make WCF, though not a lock. With a number 3 seed, we should expect to get out of the first round, but that’s about it. A 4 or lower will mean that just getting out of the first round will be an accomplishment.
I’m looking forward to the season starting so that we can see this team in action and adjust our expectations accordingly.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
Goal
1. Win division, locking up at least a #3 seed.
2. Make the western conference finals and hopefully avoid the Lakers until then.
3. Put the league on notice and make it at least a 6 game series.
That’s it really.. I’d love to say Finals but there are too many unanswered team building questions left. It’s hard to be realistic with what we have right now and call ourselves one of the top two teams in the NBA. Sure, if Oden averages a double-double, Miller/Roy mesh well and we pickup a good reliable hard working 4 to backup L.A. But those three things really need to happen before I let my fandom get in the way of clear thinking.
Regarding Hedo Türkoğlu:
Look at the bright side, Blazers fans -- you dodged a bullet. He peaked statistically two years ago. He's allegedly 30 but could be closer to 32 or 33 for all we know. (Do you trust Turkish birth certificates? And isn't it weird that he played four years of pro ball in Turkey in the 1990s?)
- Bill Simmons of ESPN.com
We can finish 2nd or 3rd in WC
and thus avoid the Lakers until the WCF. Getting to the WCF should be our goal this year. Then something special could happen, but the probability for more is low unless Greg has a very big impact.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 14, 2009 8:04 AM PDT reply actions
Hard to weigh the importance of experience, but the talent is now here...
Based on talent, I think the Blazers are as talented as any team in the league, L@kers included. It was evident in the stretch run last season when we blew out several very good teams including the L@kers. Bring in Miller, bring back Martell, add a year of maturity to the 4 rookies, and you have a dominant level of talent.
The Blazers are going to be beasts on the boards. Offensively, the arrival of Miller and added maturity for GO and Nic (or the return of Martell) is going to make it even harder for teams to double Roy and LMA. If you can’t double them, you can’t stop them. Portland simply has too many weapons for all but half-handful of teams. If the Blazers had not had the misfortune of drawing Houston, they would likely have advanced. The Blazers lost to a team that gave LA more trouble than anyone else in the playoffs even without Yao. All of which suggests that we were a lot closer to being competitive with the Lakers than is commonly recognized, even amongst Blazer fans.
Portland should be less of a jump shooting team on offense, which should help us be more competitive on the road against good teams. On defense, you could see the effect of GO during the stretch run last spring. The Blazers are not yet a dominant team defensively, but they are getting much better. Hopefully, GO and Nic are ready to take it to the next level this year. Hopefully, Miller will take some of the offensive load off Roy so that he can step up defensively. Hopefully, LMA continues to gain strength and learns to use his length to become more of a weakside, shot-blocking force. Last year the Blazers were middle of the pack defensively. This year, I expect them to be in the top ten from opening day, and wouldn’t be surprised to see them be in the top 5 by playoff time.
The wild card is the Blazers’ lack of playoff experience. It cost them in Game 1 against Houston. It might cost them again this year against a savvy veteran team like the Spurs or the L@kers.
People who make definitive predictions about seeding or outcomes in the Western Conference are blowing hot air. There are so many teams who are so competitive, that tiny unexpected events can and will alter the outcome of the season. If a top player gets hurt for even a few games, that could radically alter seeding. A couple of whistles can change a series. A back-up getting hot in a key quarter of a key playoff game can swing a series.
We don’t know what will happen. We can say that the Blazers appear poised to join the league’s elite, and we can realistically argue that we have the talent to compete with anybody.
by upper left corner on Aug 14, 2009 8:05 AM PDT reply actions
"People who make definitive predictions about seeding or outcomes in the Western Conference are blowing hot air. "
Definitive predications, yes. But I don’t think the Lakers finished with the #1 seed last year because of random luck. There are lots of variables that can change seeding positions over the year, but the best team(s) usually still finish at the top. I think it’s reasonable to expect we can get the #2 or #3 seed next year if we don’t have too many key injuries. I also think the better teams in the WC are going to start spreading out a bit more next year than the last couple of years because Phoenix and probably Houston will drop back some. It’s hard to guess what will happen in Utah.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Aug 14, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Our only hope to beat the l*kers in the WCF (if they make it)
they to keep that hunger and thirst for L*ker Blood! We all know how this team seems to get up to play them which gives us a chance.
- Neil
Knowing that we are as locked for the playoffs as a team can probably get...
and that our odds are better than most teams once we get there is good enough for me.
Should be a fun year. Another fun year!
The cowards never started
The weak died along the way
Only the strong survived
They were the Trailblazers
I never stop hoping and dreaming.
As my age is approaching high numbers, I have learned it is best to take life one day at a time and enjoy every day of life. You have heard all that crap before, but it is true and it does keep my hopes and dreams of the Blazers in tact.
I dream of championships, for the players, for the Blazers front office, the city of Portland and the state of Oregon.
The Blazers front office and team players are graded on their final performance each year. I grade them for their daily performance not the finality. It is not a dream of mine to pick up the BB and walk to the finals I dream of greatness one game at a time leading to the finals. I dream of every game with all the excitement of possible victory and acceptance of defeat. I don’t look at the schedule and say we will win this game that game and be totally disappointed if we don’t. I look forward to playing the Lakers without the expectation of outcome; that could lead up to disappointment. Instead of trying to predict the outcome of what I feel could be an exciting season providing everything goes as planned. The plan is the health and improvement of our individual parts within the scope of the team, the coach growing with the team and is willing to make offensive adjustments and gamble on new offenses. The play-offs is out of sight until we reach that goal.
On an analytical basis, It was the choking at being in the play-offs that was the problem last year not the lack of talent. We were within What 3 pts of advancing. If the same exact team played the games over with just the experience of already been there done that, the outcome would probably have been completely different.
Everybody is concerned about the new players of teams that is going to be our threats to the promise land. The Lakers has got an old team, the parts are not going to improve much. Kobe will play the same Gasol will play about the same so they won’t be that much different than last year. Trading parts with experience players is just trading one set of bad habits for another set of bad habits. It doesn’t necessarily give the Lakers a new look. The Spurs was only hampered by injury last year, being healthy and getting younger parts will give them a new look from last year but not that much better. Of course they don’t need to be that much better with all the working parts to win it all.
The point I am trying to make is with the Blazers just getting one year older with a year of growth and a new goal without any new parts makes them the most dangerous team in the NBA. With the addition of an experience pg we will be the team to fear. How far will we go this year? I sure couldn’t guess and I am not sure I would care. Oden is not going to hit the ground running, he still got to improve one game at a time. Dre is not going to hit the ground running he has to fit in one game at a time. Nate is not going to hit the ground running he has to adjust one game at a time. That is my hopes and dreams of watching the magic of growth. Getting there is where the fun is.
hg
by BBK on Aug 14, 2009 8:48 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
It is time to stop dreaming!
During the off-season as KP is trying to put his dream team together; he is required to look, by the nature of the process, at the big picture. He searches for individual parts that will come together and be greater as a whole. He most likely visualizes how player S will mesh with player P and so on and so on. He tries to give the Blazers favorable matchups against each of the other contending teams, in the hope of creating the opportunity for victory against each team, with a particular eye toward the very best team.
For example, who is going to guard the best player on the best team (Kobe)? Answer: Batum, Outlaw, Webster, and Roy. From last years experience and projections, he probably believes we can do well in that match up. But how about some of the other scoring big guards and small forwards in the western conference such as, Carmelo, Durant, Stojakovic, Artest, Jefferson, Ginobili, Thornton, and Howard, etc.? Maybe we get a pass because he feels that we have other matchups that counter balance the scoring of these players.
As he goes through the process he goes from position to position, matchup to matchup. But, he must always be on the lookout for teams like Houston last year, a team that people correctly said we did not match up well with, in particular, a team that we were not physical enough against.
It is not just about who is better, player against player—Kobe is clearly better than Batum, but can Batum slow him enough to frustrate him a little bit, causing Kobe try to, "prove himself," while ending up shooting a lower percentage for the game? Can Brandon pick at this sore a little bit by putting a few shots up in Kobe’s face. This would have a tendency to take shots away from Gasol, which again gives us a greater chance of winning as long as we can keep Gasol and Odom off the boards. This is an example of envisioning a team strategy for winning.
The time for most of this imagining is before the season starts. KP and Nate most likely sit down to discuss matchups and potential strategies for taking advantage of potential players abilities as well as potential opponents weaknesses. They try to find players that will fit into our system and culture, and as the season progresses, they try to tweak the system to take the best advantage of the players available. The key here is that there is a flow from this off-season planning and imagining to a different type of thinking that must take place during the season.
In short, during the off-season we set up a 60 win team; we project into the future how we think things will go. In a sense, we place our bets. But when training camp gets started, a team must stop dreaming about the potential of "other players" and get down to business. Implementation of the previously discussed strategies, for this particular team, must now be presented, practiced, and adjusted based on the players ability to execute.
Getting into the season, we see that this is the time to take advantage of each player’s strengths against our competitors. Every year is different. Every team is different. We must probe their team to find their weaknesses. If we can do this, and exploit particular matchups here and there, make them do what they do not want to do, and we give ourselves a chance to win.
Now that Portland has this years roster mostly in tack, we need to move on to what they can do to attack other teams. It is not so much about who is better player for player anymore. We need to rise above that sort of thinking now and think TEAM, think STRATEGY. We need to help other teams to implode on themselves. And good defense causes dissention.
Andre is a leader and going to help our team defense as well as our offense, which was already pretty efficient. What I am looking for out of this team is better defense in order to take the next step. I see Greg being in better shape, moving his feet better, fouling less, blocking—altering—more shots, and being able to stay on the floor. I see Batum being stronger, more confident, more physical, and getting more respect from the referees. I see Martell being that stronger perimeter defender we needed last year to help match up with the Artest’s and the Lebron’s of the world.
I see Brandon, Lamarcus, and Travis rededicating themselves to play better defense in a similar fashion to what we saw Lebron do last year. This must happen as a team. This is not just about one player’s decision. I see Joel and Steve maintaining their defensive intensity. I see Jerryd using his quickness against the quicker point guards in the league. And I see Cunningham and Pendergraph bringing their toughness and intensity to every practice and every game situation they get a chance to be a part of.
This is how far, how fast. This will be how the next step is taken. Will THIS TEAM do it? I hope so. I think so. But there is no avoiding how it is done. Dreaming is for the off-season and preseason, the season is the time to WORK and EXECUTE. The necessary talent is on this team, the Blazers should contend this year.
There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.
Nice job of analysis;
The big key to our improved defense, as you point out, is Greg’s improvement and ability to stay in the game. Besides taking away the middle, his rebounding skills on both ends will allow us to increase our rebounding advantage, a key to denying second chance points to other teams and gaining them for ourselves. Miller will hopefully aid in getting better shots for all teammates with an effective early offense and secondary break. Result: increased rebounding advantage and increased point differential.
Miller's defense solves a matchup problem
While Miller’s defense overall is average at best, but against the stronger PGs like Billups his size will address a serious weakness in last year’s team. Along that line of thinking, it would be great if Bayless’ game has matured enough that he earns some time on the floor against the Tony Parker’s & other quick PGs in the league.
by 52therim on Aug 15, 2009 6:51 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
IMHO, the Lakers will implode a bit,
caused by the successes of last year, merging Ron’s ego into the triangle, and perhaps an injury or two.
Blazers and Spurs finish tied at the top with 63 wins each; Blazers win head-to-head tiebreaker as of our 3 games with the Spurs, 2 are home games for us which we will win.
Lakers finish with 61 wins, Dallas with 57. Denver, N.O., Houstan, Phoenix all do worse and lose in first round. We beat Dallas in second round and play Lakers for conference championship.
ON TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP!
61 wins is not an "implosion."
The thing that could hurt the Lakers is…………….. getting hurt. They are really not that deep and EVERYTHING depends on Kobe and Pau, offensively.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
I agree; Bynum's health is also so important for them.
While he played a lot of last year, he was missing at key times, especially in parts of the playoffs and finals. If he improves bigtime, being a still young and improving player, it could offset the aging of the rest of the team.
Good teams don't frequently get their bubble popped!
The whole key to the, "dreaded doctrine of implosion," is that you get the good teams to do their imploding against your team. This may happen because of a particularly bad match up or two that really hurts and frustrates them. You cannot control what they do against other teams, the trick is for you to be the team that pops their bubble.
Take Orlando and Cleveland last year, Cleveland won a lot of games, but still had some major issues in their matchup with Orlando. Lebron had lost so much hot air, he could not even speak after they lost.
There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.
Implode a bit...
is like saying Elvis is slightly dead. ;-)
Seeing the Lakers implode, explode or any other type of plode-ing would be fun to watch, but beating them at full strength would be more fun. Probably.
I’m pretty sure Artest puts on zen repellent in the morning, so anything could happen.
The cowards never started
The weak died along the way
Only the strong survived
They were the Trailblazers
No this is a lot more like going to the dentist, or trying to get a Lakers fan to be quiet.
The official theory of implosion could more specifically called the limited theory of implosion, they do not die, the just get sick, and tired of playing you. In the end, the hope is that they just kind of give up once all the hot air is out of them.
OH, and let me assure that you as of now their air bags are filled to capacity. They are not giving anything away, we are going to have to take the wind out of them.
There is more to an athlete than how fast they can run, they also better be able to see what they are doing and know why they are doing it.
In all the praise around Ariza observers seem to forget a bit that Ariza was a 30% three point shooter in his career before the last playoffs. Artest has lost a step, but he is still the better spot up shooter.
"I'm addicted to polo y'all...respect my fresh" - Travis25Outlaw
Artest has the reputation of also being a better defender
But older, slower, not part of “show-time”, and will he mesh with the other egos. He was willing to accept less money than he might have gotten elsewhere; will he also accept being the 3rd or 4th star on the team, as well as the 3rd or 4th option on offense? I think the interplay between Jackson and Artest will also be a sight to behold!
Yeah, I literally don't understand most of the hate on that move
if Artest can sublimate his ego and play a similar role, he’s unquestionably superior to Ariza right now. In the midst of people falling all over themselves to praise Ariza’s defense, also, they forget how the Melo was absolutely lighting up the Lakers at the start of the series when Ariza guarded him full time and it was only once Kobe started guarding him in the second halves of games that they started to pull away from Denver.
Ariza is a solid defender, and should evolve into one of the best by the end of his contract (as opposed to Ron, who will barely be an NBA player by the end of his), but the hype has turned him into some Grant Hill clone, which he most definitely is not yet.
Ariza and Battier
that’s such a strange 2-3 combo. Not enough offense from the wings, both of them are spot up 3 point shooters. And without Yao the Rockets don’t have a post player who demands a double-team. Unless Rick can come up with an efficient half-court offense it’s hard to see where their points are going to come from, certainly Brooks and Scola can’t carry the load
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
is Ariza even a spot-up three point shooter? He shot well for the playoffs, but was mediocre all season long at 30ish%. How do we know it wasn’t a hot streak?
optimism ftw
by Cablinasian on Aug 15, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Frankly, I don't know what Ariza is or will be offensively in Adelman's system
he won’t be getting the wide-open shots in Houston that he was in L*A, that’s for sure
Morley is a pretty sharp GM, by all accounts. Maybe there’s something buried in the stats that made Trevor attractive to the Rockets? But after Artest ran out of the hotel late and jumped on the “VIP” bus in his underwear before their last road playoff game there was no way Ron-Ron was going to be back!
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
This scenario
would pit SA against LA in round 2. If SA gets through, they are grizzled veterans and would be tough for Blazers to beat in the WCF. Suspect that a healthy SA this year would be tougher in the playoffs than LA.
Phil Jackson has been managing egos for years. In fact, he probably has the biggest ego of them all!
Portland's PG of the Future - Meet John Wall
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
I expect the 2nd round at a minimum with this roster
However, I want a trade to clear up the SF logjam and bring in a backup PF we can trust— a simple move like that could put the Blazers in the drivers seat for the WCF with at least a chance to knock off the Lakers. I expect the Blazer front office to make this type of move… and the time is now.
At a minimum is right...
and I project the Blazers to have the home court in the West finals versus the Lakers. The Lakers are not a juggernaut, a label people are all too inclined to bestow on a defending champ from the big city. A good model for the Blazers’ prospects in the coming season is the Dallas team of three years ago — a cohesive unit at the time with the right balance of offense-defense, running vs. half court execution, rebounding, bench depth, multiple go-to guys and coaching that fit the moment (up to the very end). Portland brings this cohesion thanks to the continuing improvement of its youth, the addition (at last) of a talented true point guard (if Blake starts over Miller I will take back my coaching compliment), and the lack of a wunderkind competitor in the west. Yes, the competition from 5-6 other teams will be intense, but the Blazers have the potential to take this all the way to the finals, and I believe they will!
by blazerwizard on Aug 14, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions
No trade now, nothing pending;
Webster’s health is the key; KP said his return is like adding a free agent to last year’s team. IMO they will give it a half year to judge if Martel is fit to go for the season, and if not try to trade Outlaw’s expiring contract for another rebounding PF (depending on the first half play of Outlaw/Pendergraph/Cunningham as well).
Oden.
He’s the key.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
RT: you heard Gavin Dawson explain his reasoning for thinking the Blazers could make the NBA Finals
It’s about time you took one of takes from “the Champ” and expanded upon it, seeing as how he reads Blazersedge daily and uses the BE “topic of the day” to feed his NBA segment
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
How far...?
I truly do not see any reason they shouldn’t have a top 3 record in the LEAGUE..! the schedule is cushy this year (compared to last year).
They always rise to the L*ker challenge, so if they meet in the WCF, they should advance to the finals…
Then anything can happen in the finals….
I can feel the city drip with anticipation of the upcoming season..
Lakers are the road block
and as I’ve mentioned before, it all depends on how artest fits and how the blazers develop over last season.
I believe the blazers can win it. I believed they could last year except they ran into healthy houston. Houston and dallas were my only concerns and I don’t think the lakers would have been able to stop us.
will the blazers win it all? My prediction was still for next year, and I don’t feel a huge need to change it. This year I think we do WCF and run into the lakers who will be better suited to beat us.
"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.
But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html
Wow
the season hasn’t even started and were predicting our playoff positions. How about we start with game one of the season and move on from there.
by Cory2669 on Aug 14, 2009 10:55 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I predict a blowout in game 1
When the Blazers see the Rockets jersey’s they will see red! I pity the fools.
He did it! Yes he did!
by We-B-Dunkin on Aug 15, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Oden will have to turn the corner and live up to 50% of the hype for the team
to make it into the WCF. Sorry to slay the dreams for some of you.
Portland's PG of the Future - Meet John Wall
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
I think most of us realize
Oden needs to improve for us to go far.
How does that slay the dreams? It only slays the dreams if you don’t think he is likely to improve.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I honestly do not think Oden will completely turn the corner this season and that
Joel will remain the team’s best center. I do look for Greg to come into his own 2 seasons from now. Just a hunch. I hope I’m wrong and he becomes a beast sooner rather than later.
Portland's PG of the Future - Meet John Wall
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
With Joel on the team Greg has time to mature.
Next year all Oden has to do is stay in the games, play defense, and rebound. anything else is a big, big plus. he will become a beast in time and spurts.
hg
Completely turn the corner?
I don’t expect that, either.
But Greg is an absolutely dominant offensive rebounder, easily the best offensive rebounder in the league. Some of those offensive rebounds are going back through the basket. Greg last year scored a point every 2.3 minutes, Joel a point every 4 minutes. Greg got 0.33 rebounds per minute, Joel got 0.37 rpm. Both have a major impact on defense in the paint — but Greg fouled.
If we see marginal improvement in Greg’s foul trouble, so that he can bump his minutes up to 26-28 mpg, and see even marginal improvement offensively, you’ve got a 14/10 guy.
Greg doesn’t have to become an All-NBA center (which may well be his future) this year for us to be a much better team than we were last year.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Oden only has to stay in the game, play defense, and rebound on both ends.
His offense can wait for another year or two; his opportunistic points will be a gift, especially if they feed him on the pick and roll.
We can TOTALLY go to the finals next year!
We should have made it to the second round at least last year. The only team in our way was Houston and we unfortunately drew them in the first round. I felt we had a better than good chance to beat anybody other than Houston in the first round. We do terrible against teams with dominent big-men.
Now that Yao Ming is out next season (right?) and certainly being without Artest, Houston shouldn’t be a factor.
Spurs have been going down hill the last few seasons although they had a good off season pickup.
We beat LA 3 out of 4 games and by all means they will pick it up in the playoffs, but still we match well with them.
I can’t think of a single team in the West we can’t beat on any given night. Hopefully we will be able to asses Webster in the first few weeks to see what he brings to our new competative team…. and Oden should have progressed passed his 5 fouls in 10 minutes stat line from last year.
We are in a GREAT position!
and Oden should have progressed passed his 5 fouls in 10 minutes stat line from last year.
. We’ll need much more from Greg to get over the LA obstacle. And I see the Artest acquisition helping them more against Portland than any other team they face.
2-2 last four games btw.
Portland's PG of the Future - Meet John Wall
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
What are you saying?
It sounds like you are saying the only chance the Blazers have is other teams getting bad or old.
Come on give our guy’s credit. As said above our team is improving in leaps and bounds. We DO NOT have to rely on other teams getting hurt, getting old or playing bad. Unless of course the Blazers are the one’s that make them play bad or make them feel old or make them less likely to play through an injury.
hg
I keep hearing from people that we beat the Lakers 3 out of 4!
Actually the home team won every game 2-2 This year we play 2 home 1 away I’m hoping for a sweep but a playoff series over them would be better.
He did it! Yes he did!
by We-B-Dunkin on Aug 15, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
No.
Clearly I’m in the minority here, but I see a talented regular season team, and a pretty weak playoff team when I look at the Blazers.
The game changes in the playoffs. Teams study tape, find your tendencies, and are ready for them. The game slows down. Defense wins games. Over and over. Good pitching beats good hitting. And we just don’t have the pitching.
We have 70 million and one defensive options. But who’s going to be the stopper? Who’s going to guard Kobe, or Carmelo, or Dirk, in that final two minutes of the third quarter when they’re climbing back from a 9 point deficit to tie the score? Because that’s when playoff games are won. When a team throws everything they have at you, and you can still stop them from getting out of the hole, then you can win playoff series. And sometimes championships.
And I just don’t see those kinds of players on the Blazers roster right now. Oden and Batum might become those kinds of guys. But not this year, not yet.
So no. I don’ t think this team has an extended playoff run in them.
by LicketyBrindle on Aug 14, 2009 12:23 PM PDT reply actions
Unfortuntly I agree with you.
Thats why I’ve been preaching to start Oden, and Miller from day one;
You say this after one play-off year.
Portland may have had a bad year in the play-offs, does that mean they will never get better? I don’t hope they will get better, I know they will get much better.
LA has a great team. That alone will make the win that dethrones them more gratifying.
hg
So true, although Houston may be easier to deal with next season due to
the major changes in their roster.
Definitely see Dallas as being a pain in the backside again next year.
Portland's PG of the Future - Meet John Wall
Treat people well because Karma can hit you at any second.
We at least split the season series with Dallas this year
Book it.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
i thought we solved the Houston problem by adding Pendergraph?
by 52therim on Aug 15, 2009 7:02 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Houston, we have a problem
the Rockets “problem” was solved when Artest left and Yao had foot surgery
Pend is a rookie (2nd round draft choice) who will get spot minutes in the regular season, but he’s not a playoff contributer unless something has gone terribly wrong with LMA, Joel or Greg
I think the Blazers are looking a better backup PF option, which is why they were trying to make a deal on draft day to move up and select Hansbrough (another dodged bullet, there) and later tried to steal Millsap away from the Jazz. Outlaw + capspace (for a veteran banger) once the season starts is KP’s next best opportunity. By then we should all know how healthy Webster’s foot will be
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
The Division, and into the second series.
The Blazers tied for their division with 54 wins last year, and it’s not homerism to suggest that they will win the division this year. After all, they have two solid players on the roster that they did not have last year, and three are starting their second year and will improve. Denver has no new solid players on their roster, and they will not get the same level of improvement out of their team, that we will get out of ours. Billups, after all, has already peaked, as has Anthony. Nowtizki, Howard and Kidd are also not going to get any better.
I also expect them to win their first series, and have a very good shot at winning their second. One can argue that you have to stop Dirk or Carmelo to win a series, but the more practical reality is that teams have not always stopped these two, yet Denver and Dallas still did not win. And that transpired because they could not stop the other teams leading scorers. You don’t, after all, win a series by trading baskets.
Granted, they need to improve their defensive intensity to go deeper. But they will get that far this year. Then, we will see how that defensive intensity ramps up. Oden, Batum , Aldridge and Roy can all improve – and very likely will. Two are second year players, and two are in their 4th.
playoffs
Playoffs vs regular season, I think that is a key issue.
I find it interesting that most pundits seem to be setting high expectations for the Blazers due to being an improved team over one that won 54 regular season games.
They don’t seem to be downplaying their prospects much in light of the way they folded against the Rockets in the playoffs.
But I do think that is an important question. Will their maturity level have stepped up enough since last year to hold their own in the playoffs?
I have no doubt that they will be a lot better, but will they have reached the maturity level to be a true playoff contender?
We shall see.
seeding
“Seeding matters.”
Amen to that. IF the Blazers somehow make it to the NBA finals, I think the route to get there is to beat out the L*kers in the regular season and use the home court advantage to beat them in the playoffs. If the L*kers beat out the Blazers for home court, the L*kers make it to the NBA finals.
by the way
Am I the only one that finds it incredibly annoying when players are referred to as “pieces”?
would you prefer
“assets”?
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
An appearance in the NBA Finals.
They don’t need to win this year, they just need to make the finals.
No more wasted seasons for Brandon Roy. All the way to the finals. – Elgin
Without you out there, we're nowhere here
Get home court
I think it’s very important for the Blazers to get the best record in the league. Confidence is important, and being a young team the best record would go a long way to making us very confident. I think with one series under their belt (the Rockets last year) the Blazers are already better prepared to deal with the playoffs. We have as much talent as any team, including the mighty La**rs (that’s a joke, they aren’t really good compared to past champions) We just have to overcome our small lack of experience, but I think we will.
by desperationshot on Aug 14, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions
We are homers
Thus we expect our team to do well.
Point of fact, they had many narrow victories early in the year last year – San Antonio, Houston, Minnesota, Sacramento. They won all their close games in the early season. Statistically, that’s unlikely to happen again. However, late in the year they were blowing people out nearly every game.
So the question is, are we going to see the early season Blazers in October, or the late season Blazers. Championship teams show their commitment to winning on the first game of the season, ample evidence was last year’s opening day spanking we suffered in LA. That was a championship team. We just looked young and unready.
If we’re going to be a championship team this year, I expect the Blazers to beat Houston by 15+ in the opener, and the game to not really be as close as the score. I expect Denver to come in and get punished the next game. I expect them to win nearly all their home games, and most of their road games.
If they are going to be a championship caliber team, they will let everyone know it immediately. There’s no more “figuring things out” – that’s what vet’s camp and the pre-season are for. When the toss is made for the first game, they will be ready to win. Is that the Blazers team we’re going to see this year?
We’ll see. I hope so.
improvement is a progressive not all at once
We weren’t as good at the first of the year as we were at the end of the year. Our goal was to reach the play-off’s not the championship. They should have set their goal higher, but that is 20-20 hindsight.
You feel that all teams that are good or championship teams are as good at the first of a new season as they are at the last. Improvement throughout the year is no good. I will bet you the house that Wheels doesn’t own that all the teams and all the coaches, me and most of the fans will disagree with you.
We got beat the first game out by a championship team. Guess what we beat that championship team later. Your view is not logical.
I will bet you the house that Wheels doesn’t own the second time without being able to prove it, the Blazer team that was playing at the end of the season would have blown out the Blazers that was playing at the first of the season.
hg
A little of this and
a litlle of that and who knows what happens. A team like the Blazers can catch lightning in a bottle.
I would be happy with....
just winning a few more games on the road against playoff caliber teams. Especially the Lakers!!
Blazers' offense will get them to the playoffs.
Then they will go as far as their defense and ability to get 4th quarter stops will take them.
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
Why not the Finals?
I guess it would be a bit of a surprise if they could pull it off but I think the growth of the rookies, addition of Webster and Miller makes the team better. Spurs and Lakers would be favored over the Blazers at this point due to experience, but an injury to Duncan or 2 of either Parker/Manu/Jefferson could derail them in the playoffs and Artest could derail the Lakers all by himself. But both teams know what it takes to get to the top and that could make the difference in a playoff series.
I agree with Timbo that the window is open. I hope that they at least push into the second round this year.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
2 Fast 2 Furious?
"Should I ask? What's a punani?" - by annthefan on May 3, 2009 1:55 PM
by Sexual Tyrannosaurus on Aug 14, 2009 5:01 PM PDT reply actions
As I look at the rosters ...
and I mean really look … I am hard pressed to find a better team than ours, top to bottom. Now, the Lakers may be better 1-6, but with the development of our players, they may not. We are DEFINITELY better 1-10, but maybe that doesn’t matter.
We too have an opportunity to catch lightning in a bottle this season, and if that happens then look out. I honestly think we have a shot this year. Like Timbo said, the window is open.
Aside from a championship, though, the thing I want MOST this season is to beat the damn Mavs. That team really has our number lately.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Well
Roster wise maybe, but the playoffs are totally different. I’m a big fan, but Portland hasn’t even won a single playoff series. It takes years to build a playoff pedigree. The LA have years of playoff experience, not too mention Jackson, its going to be a long hard struggle to overcome that.
Really?
-Denver had 5 straight first round exits and then made the conference finals by changing two players (Billups and Birdman).
-Lakers missed playoffs entirely in 05, then two straight first-round exits, then made the finals and lost to Boston.
-Jazz missed the playoffs entirely for 3 straight years before making the conference finals in 07.
Obviously there are many teams who do well in the playoffs for years before making the finals. But there are plenty of examples of teams who shoot right to the top as well. I think the Blazers have the pedigree to be one of these teams.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Andre Miller = Chauncey Billups?
Because Billups is what made Denver gel. Or is he Pau Gasol, who led to the Laker turnaround? And Nate McMillan is a good coach, but he’s no Jerry Sloan.
We will make steps forward, but the title window isn’t open yet. We may thrust it open during the season though.
Apples to oranges.
All the teams I mentioned added a veteran. We, on the other hand, got better at almost every position internally. Our guys are simply getting betters. Roy, Aldridge, Oden, Rudy should all be better through maturing. Batum may be significantly better. And adding a small piece like Miller who knows how to play could give the whole team a boost. You can’t just compare Miller to Billups and be done with it. Totally different scenarios.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Right
There is no “playoff pedigree”.
You just have to play better than the other team.
If the Blazers make the second round, they will then have had the experience of both winning and losing a playoff series. The second round is not really any different from the first round, except that the team you face is probably tougher. But they team they are facing is probably tougher, too. And I don’t know if we will face a second round opponent that is any tougher than last year’s Houston team.
If we clear the second round this year, we’re in the WCF. But by then, we’ve got three playoff series under our belt, and two of them were winning series. Confidence is high, but we also know the opponent is tough.
Denver gave LA a battle in the WCF despite their lack of “pedigree”. Lack of pedigree doesn’t make the hoop any smaller, or the ball not bounce when you dribble it, or take away your ability to jump. It may mean the other team has a mental edge. In that case, it is your job to go out there and whip their behinds, tearing that mental edge out of their grasp and making it yours.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I think the ABA merger had something to do with that
adding Lucas and subtracting Wicks was huge for that team
Twardzik added some experience, as well
but the biggest difference was having a healthy Walton for the first time
I don’t know if hiring Ramsay was as important, if Weinberg had listened to Wilkens and dealt Sidney earlier (instead of firing Lenny) the ‘76 team would’ve still done extremely well with a healthy Walton
This year’s Blazer team is adding just Miiler. If the stupid Mile’s contract would’ve come off the books KP might’ve been able to add another difference-maker (Hedo? Millsap?) to really set-up the team for a serious run. For Portland to reach the WCF they’re going to need to continue to improve and see some of their rivals suffer with injury problems (which isn’t all that unusual, it happens every year to most teams, at least to some degree)
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
A little bit of parallel
A franchise center had injury problems the year before.
An experienced PG added (though Twardzik was hardly as old as Miller).
That 76-77 team also added Lucas, who had some playoff experience, but most of the players didn’t.
This team now has more playoff experience than the 76-77 team had, since almost all of them have played in one series now.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I'd love to add "another" Lucas
not a starting PF who will average 20ppg, Nate already has that with LMA
but another “Enforcer”…? As good as Przy is and as dominant as Greg will become, one more veteran big man “with attitude” and experience is the missing piece. Until that spot is filled, I’ll continue to be tepid re: Portland’s “title” chances.
No better than 2nd round and out, if they keep Travis around as the “backup 4” all year. Any playoff success will be “in spite of” Outlaw, not because of him
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I agree that another big man would be a good thing
but you overrate the importance of it.
Every team has a weak spot, most teams have several. In the playoffs, LMA is likely to play 42 mpg if needed.
If we have to have a weak spot, backup PF may be the best place to have it, because rebounding is not a huge problem on this team. We were an outstanding rebounding team even with LMA (not a great rebounder) at starting PF.
All we needed was to upgrade four positions — PG, SF, backup PF, offense from C. The first is done. The second is almost certainly done with internal development. The fourth should see some progress as well.
That means a 54 win team that wasn’t far from the second round has strengthened 3 of the 4 positions needed.
You say they’ll do no better than 2nd round and out? You way overrate the importance of backup PF. They MAY not do better than that, but there is a significant possibility they will do much better than that. And there is also a significant possibility that they will do no better than that no matter who plays backup PF, because they may run into LA or a healthy SA team in the second round.
Backup PF is not the most important position on the team. It was one of four places we needed an upgrade over last year’s team. Only one of four.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
RT: rebounding is not a huge problem on this team
Sure, it’s easy to look at the regular season stats from last year and come to that conclusion, but I invite you to replay the final 12 minutes from game 4 of the Rocket’s series and then ask yourself what’s more important, a guy like Outlaw who can (maybe) get hot and make some fall-away jumpers, or a veteran post defender who can check an opponent (without fouling) and secure the rebound in a close game?
KP said that his #1 goal was to add “toughness and physicality” to the roster heading into the off-season. Then more recently Nate made two unsolicited comments when he was interviewed (following the Miller signing) that the team needed a “beast” who could play down low and (supposedly) backup Aldridge. So no, I don’t think I’m “over-emphasizing” the need for a backup PF at all. LMA is not a “physical” player in the mold of Lucas, and even with as much rebounding and toughness as Joel/Greg offer at the center position, it’s not going to be easy to get more than 48mpg out of the 5 combo. (And then there’s the little problem of injuries, and having to rely on rookie 2nd round draft choices who won’t be getting the benefit of the doubt from the refs while they’re getting schooled by veteran big men for too many minutes a night.)
Winning championships is about playing defense, getting stops and securing the ball. I read that in an article somewhere on BE earlier tonight, and it’s something I’ve observed since at least 1977. No one is going to convince me that the Blazers have enough depth/experience at the 4/5 to win the WC this year if KP leaves the current roster as it is. They’re still one experienced big man short of a playoff-ready frontcourt
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
We see it differently
Last year, the L@kers fourth big man was Luke Walton, and they did ok. The year before, Walton was their third big man and they made the Finals.
Why? Because after Bynum went down two years ago, they were thin in the front court, but they were strong at other positions and compensated.
You can always hide one weak spot. You can usually hide a couple.
This is not a time of desperation.
What’s more important? Both are valuable. I’ve watched basketball as long as you have. I’ve seen Vinnie Johnson come off the bench and destroy teams. I watched Herm Gilliam do it to LA in 1977. Travis is one of those kinds of guys. He’s the kind who, even when you are behind, can explode and get you back in a game. He’s the kind who can come in and singlehandedly blow a game open.
Sure, you want the Lloyd Neal who can come in and defend and rebound, rebound, rebound. No doubt about it. But not every team has that, and there is nothing magical about it that having a guy like that turns you into a contender, and not having one makes you not a contender.
If you lack it, you’ve got to make up for it in other ways, that’s all. It’s still five men on the court, not one.
This team, as currently constructed, would not be in the same position in game 4 in Houston this year. Against that same Rockets team, they would win the home games easily. They’ve got the first playoff game nervousness over and done with, now. And they might have taken game three in Houston, but if not, they would have been so far ahead in game four that the fourth quarter would have never happened.
This team is much, much better than last year. This team is capable of crushing opponents, even elite opponents, long before they have a chance to exploit any weaknesses at backup 4.
And this team is unlikely to even have Travis on the court in crunch time much of the time unless we need to spread the floor with a clutch 3 point threat on a last second possession. We were running Travis out there because Nate wanted an offensive threat at both 4 and 5. This year, that will be Greg and LMA.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Trajectories and Dynasties
Players generally hit their prime in the NBA around the age of 27. Roy, Aldridge, Oden, Webster, Fernandez, and Batum have several or more years to go before they get there, whereas Blake, Pryz and Miller are vets, and Outlaw seems to have peaked. There still tends to be a little disbelief about the Blazers 54 victories last year. Some talk about “close wins”, but good teams always win more of the close ones than they lose – which is why they’re a good team.
The Blazers are calling Batum back to look at his shoulder, but I might suggest you read the inverview with Batum because he spent much of the season with a shoulder that limited his mobility, and only now has he been able to take the time to rehab it, which he wasn’t able to do during the season. This affected his shot and his ability to defend. We also know very well that Oden’s recovery, and then early season injury, set him back. And then, we lost our starting SF for the season, and did not have Miller.
The Blazers won 54 games in spite of being as banged up as any other team, having three first year players gathering a lot of playing time, and having their two stars in their third year.
It’s not homerism, as such, to expect improvment – and that improvement will be added to last years 54 wins – which few expected at the beginning of the season last year. Add to this attitude. This is a team that likes each other, is motivated, and determined to improve. And, as the core moves towards their prime, they will indeed improve – both individually and as a team. And one area that will improve as this group plays together – is team defense.
We then have the declarations of “weowntheblazers”. Whereas I fully expect LA to be the favorite next year, talk of a dynasty is premature. They are not, by any stretch, the “best” team of all time. Kobe and Bynum are no match for Magic and Kareem, for example, anymore than you can declare them better than Bird and Parish. Pau compares well to McHale and to Worthy, and is better than Green and Rambis, but Fisher does not match Dennis Johnson, for example, and one cannot foreget JoJo and Scott.
Man for man, as we move several years downstream, we will see Oden – who was better in his first year than Bynum – neutralize Bynum. We will see Adlridge neutralize Pau. Right now, Miller is superior to Fisher. This takes us to Artest who is currently superior to Batum or Webster, and Odom who is better than Outlaw. However, Batum and Webster’s trajectory is upward – whereas Artest and Odom’s is flat. They’ve peaked.
On the second team, Pryz, Blake and Fernandez are already superior to their counterparts on the Lakers. And whether Batum or Webster play on the second team, they are still as good or better than their counterpart.
Then, you have Roy vs. Bryant. Bryant is at his peak, whereas Roy is still expanding his game – and has yet to peak.
Next years a little early, but the following year we will see these trajectories start to cross.
LA has already learned how emphemeral “dynasties” are. They thought they had it – but the Shaq-Kobe chemistry blew it up. Those egos simply could not co-exist. They though they were there with Magic, but his illness took him out early.
“WeowntheBlazers” enthusiasm knows no bounds – and he should feel good. But like anything, it’s short term. Ask Garnett and Boston.
one cannot foreget JoJo
White was traded to the Warriors the year before Bird came on board (’79) Parrish and McHale came along a year later and this trio won their first title with Archibald, Henderson and Carr in the backcourt
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/BOS/1981.html
DJ wasn’t added to the roster until ’83, probably to defend Magic
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/BOS/1984.html
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
LA has already learned how emphemeral "dynasties" are
I’ve followed the NBA since ‘70, and have read about league history going back before that. Ever since the L*ker franchise was moved to L*A they haven’t been “down” for long. So, while we can look at the ages of their current players and project where we “think” they might be in 2-3 years, I fully expect them to “reload” every offseason (like this year, with Ron-Ron) No, the Buss family doesn’t have unlimited finances, but the purple/gold is a huge FA attraction and veterans will take less money to play there. Here’s a test: try to think of a time when they didn’t have at least one “superstar” on their roster (it was back in ’94-95…and they still won 48 games)
This is an economic reality, David Stern needs the L*A market to have a championship-caliber ballclub, and as long as Donald Sterling is the owner it’s not going to be the Clippers
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I think you're right, from top to bottom the Blazers are as talented as anyone
From top to bottom the Blazers have an awesome roster… I challenge anyone who reads this to show me a better one. The front office has really done a great job at putting this team together – they made a plan of action to put an end to the jailblazer era by dumping the entire team and completely rebuilding the program via the draft, putting as much of an emphasis on character as they do talent. They knew it would be years before the team was any good again… all of the losing would be painful and hard to watch, so a lot of people didn’t, which cost Paul Allen many, many millions of dollars.
That plan of action is nearly complete… it was every bit as long and painful as they said it would. Using the draft they were very careful to select players that 1) were a perfect fit for the system they wanted 2) had great character and high morals 3) a strong work ethic, the drive to succeed, and a very high basketball I.Q. 4) great athletes with tons of potential. It wasn’t long before the system they eventually wanted to use began to take shape and two young stars emerged that would be the foundation for which the whole program would be built around – Brandon Roy and Lamarcus Aldridge. There was one surprise along the way though when Portland won the lottery… the teams nucleus of Roy and Aldridge became exponentially stronger (in theory) with the addition of Greg Oden, the #1 overall pick in the draft. Those 3 players are a great foundation to build a team around, and with some very smart moves on draft days by the front office – particularly KP – they “pritch slapped” together a roster that is loaded with extremely talented, young, potential stars as the supporting cast.
The Blazers have 2 guys at every position capable of starting in the NBA. If the starters are Miller, Roy, Batum, Aldridge, and Oden… that gives us a second unit of Blake, Rudy, Webster, Outlaw, and Przybilla. That second unit is better than some teams have for starters… maybe a lot of teams. That is a lot of youth too, so most of them will improve a ton over the next few years… one of the starters is so young he may not be finished growing yet. Barring total disaster I think the Blazers will finish in the top 3 from the west, probably top 2. The only team that will most likely be better than Portland is the lakers… and that is just for this year because next year the Blazers will be the favorite to win the west. It’s a great time to be a Blazer.
RT: The Blazers have 2 guys at every position capable of starting in the NBA
Outlaw is not a starting PF for a playoff-caliber team
I’m not saying the Blazers “need” another starting PF (like Lee or Millsap) but they do need another veteran PF who has the experience of playing a significant post-season role, in the past
When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I think you're right, from top to bottom the Blazers are as talented as anyone
From top to bottom the Blazers have an awesome roster… I challenge anyone who reads this to show me a better one. The front office has really done a great job at putting this team together – they made a plan of action to put an end to the jailblazer era by dumping the entire team and completely rebuilding the program via the draft, putting as much of an emphasis on character as they do talent. They knew it would be years before the team was any good again… all of the losing would be painful and hard to watch, so a lot of people didn’t, which cost Paul Allen many, many millions of dollars.
That plan of action is nearly complete… it was every bit as long and painful as they said it would. Using the draft they were very careful to select players that 1) were a perfect fit for the system they wanted 2) had great character and high morals 3) a strong work ethic, the drive to succeed, and a very high basketball I.Q. 4) great athletes with tons of potential. It wasn’t long before the system they eventually wanted to use began to take shape and two young stars emerged that would be the foundation for which the whole program would be built around – Brandon Roy and Lamarcus Aldridge. There was one surprise along the way though when Portland won the lottery… the teams nucleus of Roy and Aldridge became exponentially stronger (in theory) with the addition of Greg Oden, the #1 overall pick in the draft. Those 3 players are a great foundation to build a team around, and with some very smart moves on draft days by the front office – particularly KP – they “pritch slapped” together a roster that is loaded with extremely talented, young, potential stars as the supporting cast.
The Blazers have 2 guys at every position capable of starting in the NBA. If the starters are Miller, Roy, Batum, Aldridge, and Oden… that gives us a second unit of Blake, Rudy, Webster, Outlaw, and Przybilla. That second unit is better than some teams have for starters… maybe a lot of teams. That is a lot of youth too, so most of them will improve a ton over the next few years… one of the starters is so young he may not be finished growing yet. Barring total disaster I think the Blazers will finish in the top 3 from the west, probably top 2. The only team that will most likely be better than Portland is the lakers… and that is just for this year because next year the Blazers will be the favorite to win the west. It’s a great time to be a Blazer.
I think you're right, from top to bottom the Blazers are as talented as anyone
From top to bottom the Blazers have an awesome roster… I challenge anyone who reads this to show me a better one. The front office has really done a great job at putting this team together – they made a plan of action to put an end to the jailblazer era by dumping the entire team and completely rebuilding the program via the draft, putting as much of an emphasis on character as they do talent. They knew it would be years before the team was any good again… all of the losing would be painful and hard to watch, so a lot of people didn’t, which cost Paul Allen many, many millions of dollars.
That plan of action is nearly complete… it was every bit as long and painful as they said it would. Using the draft they were very careful to select players that 1) were a perfect fit for the system they wanted 2) had great character and high morals 3) a strong work ethic, the drive to succeed, and a very high basketball I.Q. 4) great athletes with tons of potential. It wasn’t long before the system they eventually wanted to use began to take shape and two young stars emerged that would be the foundation for which the whole program would be built around – Brandon Roy and Lamarcus Aldridge. There was one surprise along the way though when Portland won the lottery… the teams nucleus of Roy and Aldridge became exponentially stronger (in theory) with the addition of Greg Oden, the #1 overall pick in the draft. Those 3 players are a great foundation to build a team around, and with some very smart moves on draft days by the front office – particularly KP – they “pritch slapped” together a roster that is loaded with extremely talented, young, potential stars as the supporting cast.
The Blazers have 2 guys at every position capable of starting in the NBA. If the starters are Miller, Roy, Batum, Aldridge, and Oden… that gives us a second unit of Blake, Rudy, Webster, Outlaw, and Przybilla. That second unit is better than some teams have for starters… maybe a lot of teams. That is a lot of youth too, so most of them will improve a ton over the next few years… one of the starters is so young he may not be finished growing yet. Barring total disaster I think the Blazers will finish in the top 3 from the west, probably top 2. The only team that will most likely be better than Portland is the lakers… and that is just for this year because next year the Blazers will be the favorite to win the west. It’s a great time to be a Blazer.
I think you're right, from top to bottom the Blazers are as talented as anyone
From top to bottom the Blazers have an awesome roster… I challenge anyone who reads this to show me a better one. The front office has really done a great job at putting this team together – they made a plan of action to put an end to the jailblazer era by dumping the entire team and completely rebuilding the program via the draft, putting as much of an emphasis on character as they do talent. They knew it would be years before the team was any good again… all of the losing would be painful and hard to watch, so a lot of people didn’t, which cost Paul Allen many, many millions of dollars.
That plan of action is nearly complete… it was every bit as long and painful as they said it would. Using the draft they were very careful to select players that 1) were a perfect fit for the system they wanted 2) had great character and high morals 3) a strong work ethic, the drive to succeed, and a very high basketball I.Q. 4) great athletes with tons of potential. It wasn’t long before the system they eventually wanted to use began to take shape and two young stars emerged that would be the foundation for which the whole program would be built around – Brandon Roy and Lamarcus Aldridge. There was one surprise along the way though when Portland won the lottery… the teams nucleus of Roy and Aldridge became exponentially stronger (in theory) with the addition of Greg Oden, the #1 overall pick in the draft. Those 3 players are a great foundation to build a team around, and with some very smart moves on draft days by the front office – particularly KP – they “pritch slapped” together a roster that is loaded with extremely talented, young, potential stars as the supporting cast.
The Blazers have 2 guys at every position capable of starting in the NBA. If the starters are Miller, Roy, Batum, Aldridge, and Oden… that gives us a second unit of Blake, Rudy, Webster, Outlaw, and Przybilla. That second unit is better than some teams have for starters… maybe a lot of teams. That is a lot of youth too, so most of them will improve a ton over the next few years… one of the starters is so young he may not be finished growing yet. Barring total disaster I think the Blazers will finish in the top 3 from the west, probably top 2. The only team that will most likely be better than Portland is the lakers… and that is just for this year because next year the Blazers will be the favorite to win the west. It’s a great time to be a Blazer.

by 






























