Thursday Hedo Watch
At some point I expect to spontaneously combust if I read more non-news on Hedo but given that this is the first big-name free agent the Blazers have chased in years I'll keep going wall-to-wall with the link coverage. As noted in Prez's fanpost, feel free to drop links in these threads and I'll get them up ASAP.
------
This afternoon on his radio show Wheels At Work, Blazers Radio play by play announcer Brian Wheeler stated that if things continue to develop as they have been, the Blazers could potentially reach an agreement in principle with Hedo Turkoglu as early as tomorrow.
------
This afternoon on 1080 The Fan, Jason Quick said he believes there's a "96 % chance" Hedo will be a Blazer.
------
Clyde Drexler weighs in on Hedo on 95.5's MSP this morning. Download the audio here...
Obviously, he's proven himself as a very good player... he's a seasoned veteran.... Do you have a position for him? Power Forward? Small Forward? Do you play him at Point Forward? You have to have an offense designed for his calibre of play.
The Blazers are obviously young, deep and talented and have the best team for the future in the entire league...
Adding a guy like Turkoglu can only improve the chemistry. But if you add Turkoglu, who do you take out of the mix? You've got Fernandez, who I think is just as good. I don't get it.
John Hollinger weighs in on Hedo-to-Portland during a live chat...
I like it .. not sure I love it. He's not really a $50 million player or anything close to it, but he's probably the best fit of the players available.
Why Hedo over Ariza?
Blazers desperately want another player who can create off the dribble so they're not so ridiculously dependent on Roy, something Houston exposed in last year's playoffs. So Hedo fits -- the Blazers can even use the "no PG" lineup like Orlando did and play Rudy-Turk-Roy in the backcourt. As for Ariza, my presumption has been that LA would match any offer for Ariza, and despite the comments put out there yesterday it's not clear to me that LA really isn't willing to go past midlevel for him -- now if they can get Artest for the same money THEN I think Ariza is very portable and a team like Portland should pounce.
What is the biggest downside of bringing in Hedo?
The fact that he's 30 and might stink in two years. That's the downside potential.
Say the Blazers sign Turk. Who do they then trade out of Bayless, Mills, Blake, Rudy, Webster, and Outlaw... you can't have all those guys... can you?
I suspect Outlaw is the one that goes .. cap-friendly with just one year left at $4 mil, and his shot-creating ability won't be needed so much.
Doug Smith of the Toronto Star...
The Raptors seem to have pulled back on a decision to take a run at Orlando's Hedo Turkoglu, who now seems a good bet to land in Portland.
Still, two NBA sources said yesterday they thought Turkoglu was more interested in landing in Toronto than the Pacific Northwest. A report yesterday afternoon that Toronto was planning some exorbitant $60 million offer, however, was debunked by a handful of sources. It would take Toronto renouncing the rights to Shawn Marion, Anthony Parker, Carlos Delfino and others to get a Turkoglu deal done and one league source said a deal with Delfino was "close."
Ken Berger of CBS Sports...
The Toronto Raptors, for one, are deliberating what it would take to make Turkoglu an offer that would top the the five-year, $50 million proposal that Portland can offer, as reported early Wednesday by CBSSports.com. According to a person familiar with the situation, the Raptors are mulling whether they would be better off making a pre-emptive strike for Turkoglu -- which would entail renouncing the rights to Shawn Marion, Carlos Delfino, and Anthony Parker -- or trying to keep those players and sign a mid-level free agent. Toronto has yet to offer an extension to 2010 free agent Chris Bosh; that decision is tied to the others. And Turkoglu isn't the only free agent Toronto is considering. League sources indicated early Thursday that the Raptors also were contemplating an offer to restricted free agent David Lee.
Dwight Jaynes with a look at the minute crunch...
If Turkoglu comes to Portland at upwards of $9 million per season, you can expect the team to use him at least 36 minutes a game. A small portion of that time could come at power forward, of course. But the other problem for Rudy is that the Blazers are going to want playing time for their backup small forward(s) - either a developing Batum, who simply cannot ride the pines with his defensive skills, or Martell Webster, who, if he's healthy is going to be a big help with his outside shooting. Or both.
Dwight Jaynes sums up what makes for successful "recruiting"...
Forget the tours. Don't worry about the fancy dinner or the luxury items.
Be careful about bidding against yourself, but you better acknowledge right now what it's really all about. It's always about the money. Always....
Wendell Maxey looks at the market rate being set for NBA free agents...
Ben Gordon was busy laughing all the way to the bank.
Gordon verbally agreed to a five-year, $55 million deal with the Detroit Pistons on the first day of free-agency, and in doing so set the bar far too high for the other free-agents out there looking to get paid in full.
In other words, Ben Gordon done messed the game up.
Because that's the kind of deal Hedo is looking for.
It appears that the Blazers do indeed have an issue on their hands when it comes to Rudy.
Check out this news of a Spanish Radio interview Rudy just gave... translated and summarized by our good friend in Spain amlmart1...
Acording to Marca Rudy talked to Efe Radio:
1º.- There´re always rumors and he knows about them from the press.
2º.- He hasn´t talked to his agents about him leaving the Blazers. He has only comented with them about the possibility of Turkoglu going to Portland.
3º.- He doesn´t close doors to any team from Europe or the NBA.
4º.- Asked about whether Torkoglu going to Portland might affect his playing time, he said: I want to play. We´ll have to talk with Portland and ask them how can I do it.
Also from amlmart1, here's a translated take on the same interview posted on ACB.com...
" Turkoglu is a Guard and we are speaking about almost six for two positions. This makes me think that the team does not give me space for my work. I have demonstrated that I could be more of a factor."
"I have been surprised with the minutes that I have played but if now they pick up a player in my position, that will stop my progression, and what I want is minutes so I can improve."
Nate Jones talks about Ariza in Portland (scroll down or click here for Dave's take)...
Turk is also on the wrong side of 30. I've never been a fan of giving long term deals to non-elite perimeter players over the age of 30.
In contrast, Trevor Ariza does not need the ball in his hands to be effective. On offense he gets his points by slashing to the bucket, picking up garbage put-backs around the rim and hitting spot-up 3s. Also, he's an absolute defensive stud that would help the Blazers in their struggles of guarding some of the league's quicker PGs. He's also only 24 years old.
On top of that, stealing Ariza away from the Lakers would weaken the Blazers' toughest conference foe.
Raptor Blog has this analysis...
Hedo Turkoglu, 30 years old - The greatest Turkish player in NBA history is one of the hottest commodities on the free agent market. Strengths: Hedo is a savvy, gifted offensive player who can contribute both as a scorer and playmaker. Weaknesses: It's a testament to Dwight Howard's impact that the Magic were able to disguise what a mediocre defender he is. Also, he's incredibly overrated as a clutch shooter.
The Dino Nation Blog has come out against Hedo...
According to many sources I am suppose to believe Bryan Colangelo is willing to pass out 50 to 60 million dollars toHedo? That is a hell of a lot of pizza money. Portland and the Raps said to be the front runners. This is one time I am cheering really hard for Raptors to lose. Because if you lose in the end you will really win. That sounds very Yogi Berra like did it not?
Max Handelman of Beyond Bowie writes...
It's funny how conventional wisdom so quickly coalesces, and hardens into an almost impenetrable truth. Right now, in Blazerville, support for signing Hedo Turkoglu (to a reported 5-year, $50 million contract) is probably running at about 10-1.
Where is that number coming from? Sean's Oregonlive poll today has it roughly 50/50. Our previous polls this week have been regularly Anti-Hedo.
John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water.
-- Ben (benjamin.golliver@gmail.com)
1 recs |
434 comments
|
Comments
The Pistons got robbed
Ben Gordon and Charlie V are Kwame Brown and AI v.2.0
by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Charlie can be a very good player
He can score, rebound… I’d have had it instead of Turkoglu
Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
him, sorry
Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water. "
As is fitting for “journalist” of his “stature”.
by JordanLeDoux on Jul 2, 2009 9:17 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
one rec for Jordan
> John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water.
One rec for Ben – Elgin
Without you out there, we're nowhere here
by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
No link for Canzano’s “sports article”
by Blazer Fan in Chicago on Jul 2, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Massive roster/chemistry shakeup for the Blazers
and he talks about how to properly prepare Hedo’s favorite pregame meal….which consists of something that a six year old with minimal working knowledge of a microwave could make?
Well played, sir. Glad the Oregonian is paying you to write those “hard hitting” “sports” “articles.” Maybe he could cover for the FoodDay writers if/when they get laid off.
by emc503 on Jul 2, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just going to close my eyes
and wait for this to be done. Turk is average. We have average at the SF position already. This makes no sense to me.
OLP is the best thing Canada has given the world outside of maple syrup
by SuperDave on Jul 2, 2009 9:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
good idea
I am really tired of wild “reports” of possible deals. Their main function seems to be to get attention rather than get real (excluding our Dave/Ben reality check team). “The 50 milloin Portland could offer”…. why stop there, Mr. Allen has more that that, he “could” offer a LOT more, pay any tax…. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. That could get some headline clicks. Give me a break. I remember someone saying, “once you hear about a deal, it is already dead”…. that would be nice in this case.
Turk doesn’t want to go NW, lets not force the guy against his will !!! Please, don’t do us any favors. Walking from the nice deal with a finals team, really ??? When is enough enough ? Yeah, doesn’t make sense to me either.
by Berkeley on Jul 2, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why the big push for Turk?
Many has said that we need to up grade to win the Championship. This is all based on their performance in the play-offs last year. IMO, we needed the play-offs to get that experience that everybody is talking about. I have heard many bloggers say that we just drew the wrong team for the first round. I think that Houston was a good team to go up against for the first time in almost a decade because the team found out how tough you had to be and how tough it is to go up against a team that has great players. The got some quality experience.
I don’t think anybody thought we were going to the finals last year, although, we came closer than some realized. Remember the two games we lost in Houston by what a total of 4 pts. Those games could vary well have been won. It was the lack of experience and choking up that made us lose. There is no way of proving it, but I would bet you the house I don’t own, if we were to play those games over with the same players after the experience we gained we would win those games.
Remember the plan was just to make the play-offs to get experience. Most of the fans didn’t think we were experienced enough to make the play-offs or if we did it would be eighth seed. We would get beat in the first round. Be honest, How many, including me thought we would be in the upper seeds, have home court advantage and tie for the championship with Denver?
Now, it seems like most fans want to trade these young men off because they are not good enough to win it all. Nobody knows that because nobody knows how good the same team will be next year. We dropped the players that wanted to go somewhere else to get more pt. or weren’t fitting in to what we needed. We replaced them with what I feel is pretty good off the bench type players.
Why can’t we give these players another year, if for no other reason than to thank them for going to war for us and playing with the heart that we all should be proud of. The over achievement of this team was because of chemistry and the want to win.
It is common knowledge that we need team D. Not individual D. We were getting better and were almost respectable at the end of the year.
Now, you want to trade of players that didn’t play great D for players that don’t play any better D. You want to trade someone off that is a crunch time player for someone else that is a crunch time player. You want to trade someone off that is streaky at shooting for someone that is streaky at shooting, you want to trade off someone that will probably get better with age for someone that will probably get worst because age. You want to trade inexperience for experience for instant satisfaction of thinking we could win the championship with him next year. I would bet the house that somebody else might win in my first bet that even with Turk we won’t win it all next year. That is because of the lack of team D not individual D and we are not there yet.
With or with out Turk we are going to be a lot better next year because of growth and chemistry. We might win a few more games with Turk than without him, but that is no guarantee. If Martell stays healthy and Travis improves on D. we could probably be as good.
I am sorry about the rant and raving. I am not against Turk; I am not against Outlaw or Blake. I am just saying why mortgage the farm when he is not needed until after the following year when we will know more.
Who knows we could very easily win it all with the guys we have. Besides all of that if you got rid of Blake and Travis, you would have to find someone else to hate. You hated JJ until you ran him off than you transferred your hate to Travis until you run him off then you will discover Turk can’t walk on water and isn’t that much better than Travis after-all and will start hating on him. Oh and I forgot Oden which isn’t the savior you were waiting for. Like the rest of the team give him a chance to grow.
hg
by BBK on Jul 2, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
REC
Well said hg… I think I’ve read your posts at O-live also and I respect your opinion.
by Ilikeemall on Jul 2, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You hated JJ until you ran him off
I think you have an over-inflated view of how fan reaction (especially on an internet blog!) influences front office decision-making
Jack was traded (not “run off”) to improve the ballclub. Not because Blazersedge thought he should be, but because Blazer management thought it was the best course of action
The only way fans can affect the front office is by buying seaosn tickets and making their voice heard at a round table meeting. Then, if they still aren’t satisfied they can choose not renew their seat (or suite) licenses. If enough fans choose to do this, then “changes” will be made (for example, back in 2003-2004)
Otherwise, what we think about players, coaches, GMs and Mr. Allen is irrelevant
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Bonzi.
“We’re not really going to worry about what the hell [the fans] think about us,” Wells says. “They really don’t matter to us. They can boo us every day, but they’re still going to ask for our autographs if they see us on the street. That’s why they’re fans and we’re NBA players.”
by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers will send you a nice email in response
If you write them and complain about spending $$$ on Hedo (etc)
But then they’ll turn around and do whatever they want to do, anyway
(and why shouldn’t they?)
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will acknowledge my error in anger and haste
I thank you for your reply.
hg
by BBK on Jul 2, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I second your analysis ! ! !
Our year of experience is worth more than any of the free agents left availabie.
Though I wouldn’t mind an upgrade at pg or a bruiser down low, I would also be happy standing pat.
Kenny Rogers puts it best: “You’ve got to know when to hold ’em.” This is that time.
Stand pat, Blazers, and dance with them that brung ya.
by Jackalope 66 on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Allen has already said "all in!" 2 weeks ago
And KP is going to cash in his chips
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we did get Hedo to play the role of Travis off the bench and Hinrich replacing Blake, that would make us a better team.. I wonder if that’s KP’s plan.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It looks like Portland is really trying to get Hedo Turkoglu.
Odds of it being a smoke screen are pretty low. I hope they don’t over pay him if they think he’s a fit for this team. Or better yet, bid so low, that Turkoglu turns us down. I’ll find a way to live with him if he does sign, but I’m still not thrilled about the idea.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m really starting to wonder if KP already has a deal in place for Travis, as I’ve come to the same conclusion you have. This is very unlikely to be a smokescreen.
if we got Hinrich and Turkoglu, that would be acceptable.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
I’m thinking that if we don’t have a follow up deal in place, we at least have several “irons in the fire”. Obviously, if we sign Hedo, Travis will never wear a Blazer uniform again. The only question is who gets shipped out with him, and who comes back
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich and the Turk would work from an X ’n O perspective……
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cab, we get it. You really want to see the Hinrich and Hedo show.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
didn’t say that. I’d rather we not sign Hedo.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duly noted.
I’ll rephrase – you dearly are hoping for the Hinrich maneuver.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you like me and all ....
…. but hell no. That’s just not going to happen.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
out, demon!
Lessen your hold and come out of him NOW! – Elgin
Without you out there, we're nowhere here
by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Things are getting pretty bromantic in here.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why have the Captain
when it’ll be Hedo, B-Roy, Rudy, LMA, and Greg on the floor at the end of quarters. Blake is the one with less minutes, Bayless should take some of Steve’s minutes too.
Having Hedo takes the ball out of Blake’s hands.
by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Signing Hedo means no pg
Hedo’s skill-set involves being a point-forward. Having him play that position means that the pg is not as much a necessity.
I don’t see a combo of Hedo and Hinrich.
It would be far too expensive. We need to sign our players to extensions, and signing both Hedo and Kirk would cut into our ability to do that.
by Jackalope 66 on Jul 2, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the lopsided trade could still be done
Outlaw+Blake for Hinrich. Chicago would bank the expiring contracts of Steve/Travis next July to the tune of 7.6 mil
Do I think it’s likely? Not so much after Gordon left
And I think Portland is contemplating a Roy-Rudy-Turk-LMA-Oden lineup
length > strength
New defensive strategy: pack the paint, and pray the other team doesn’t make 20+ three-pointers against you
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would make sense minutewise if a lopsided trade happined.
And Hinrich would be perfect with Hedo. Good perimeter defense and he would be a good spot up shooter in the Hedo & Roll.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hedo Fans
Hedo is a great guy to have on your team. Willing to do what he is told, take clutch shots, etc.
BUT…isn’t anyone wondering why instead of resigning Hedo, the Magic opted to go with a guy two years his senior instead? The reason is simple, the Magic’s system made Hedo above average (chuck away at 3’s, have one of the most dangerous dunkers in the league drawing attention down low, and a host of great 3 point shooters spreading the flor), but the bottom line is he is a good solid player, but not a 10 mil/tr. player. The Magic had him for 5 years, they should know more than anyone if he is worth that right? Coming off a championship berth and all, they decided to blow up the team and let Hedo go because he wanted that much money. Sounds to me like a great big flare just went up. The Magic relied on Hedo more than anyone when Jameer went down and they still deem him expendable at that price, but other teams are willing to stomach it?
I could see the Magic getting bullied into that price because their fans are all sentimental about the Finals berth, but why are other teams jumping off the cliff blindly thinking that they will land on something doft? If the only team that looked over the edge and saw what was below said uh-uh, no way, then what the hell are the rest of you doing? The Blazers have one of the most exciting lineups in the NBA, why get a point forward that can NOT create his own shot, relies on having a dominant post player with major spacing from 3 point shooting and a screen to make a play. This isn’t Roy or Wade who can create in traffic. This is a guy that needs a wide open lane and a head of steam.
That being said, you will get a good player in Hedo, and a good locker room guy. I am just saying he won’t be worth that kind of money, this year, next year, or in 4 years. But there is no turning back now, so I hope I am wrong!
by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man
So many typos so little time. Sorry.
But the moral of the story is on point.
by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind
that we also intend to have a dominant big with sharp shooters all around ………plus Roy
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Jul 2, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ummm
I wouldn’t put Portland in the dominant big man category just yet.
by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he did say "intend to have"
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good perspective
but KP and Nate know what they are doing better than me.
by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The good news is
That Hedo won’t be a total loss no matter what, he has definite skills that will last a long time. He doesn’t rely on speed so the age thing isn’t really a factor. He isn’t a good defender so he can’t get much worse. And you don’t have to be a good defender when you are 6’10 to be honest, you can get the job done just by putting your hands up. So even though he isn’t worth that much money, he isn’t a bad pick up, my former vent did not point that out well enough.
by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"He isn’t a good defender so he can’t get much worse."
Only $10 million a year, folks. Step right up!
by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am coming around to the idea of having a point forward.
It would make us one of the more unique styles of play in the league with 3 legit ballhandling options in the starting lineup.
And Hedo is totally a better #3 option right now for our offense. When he gets older and less effective, hopefully one of our young studs would be ready to step into a #3 option by then.
More talent added to the team does necessitate a larger trade by what we are free to give up. I say we instantly become a more flexable team.
Ugh, that is the best I have after 24 hours of digestion.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fun new game:
did this come from canzano’s latest or hedo’s wiki page?
Turkoglu was born in Istanbul. He grew up speaking Serbian, which his parents still speak to him. It’s why as a rookie in Sacramento he became close friends with Vlade Divac and Peja Stojakovic. He called them “Brother Vlade” and “Brother Peja.”
blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter
by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Batum ~ Ariza
Isn’t Batum the same player Ariza was two seasons ago? I just wouldn’t understand taking a Batum-clone rather than just letting Batum develop.
by misterblack on Jul 2, 2009 9:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly what I was thinking.
Hedo would help take the pressure off Roy and give us anther guy to initiate the offense. Ariza does not do this for us at all. We already have what Ariza is bringing to the table… and for a lot less money.
by BlazerBen on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
Batum is better. Bigger skill set and higher ceiling than Ariza 2 years pasr.
Of course, Ariza is better right now. But if Batum is given starter PT next season, I don’t think you would be able to say the same thing by the end of the regular season.
by xedubx on Jul 2, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Batum's already hitting the 3.
Ariza finially became effective by developing a moderately legit offensive game. Batum is halfway there, the attacking the basket thing needs to come next.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dwight Jaynes is smoking something....
….if he thinks Hedo is getting 36 minutes a game.
Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldrdige got 37 minutes per game last year. And he thinks Turkoglu is gonna step in and take as big a role as those two guys??? There’s no way in the world that happens.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Then how many minutes is he going to get per game?
35?
blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter
by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thoughts
assuming Hedo, the minutes breakdown looks to me to be:
Roy 36
LMA 36
Hedo 32
Rudy 30
Greg 28
Joel 18
Batum 20
Blake 24
Bayless 16
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
can you break those down
even more? Like how Hedo/Batum will split the SF minutes, and how Roy/Rudy will split the SG minutes. Because just looking at that it doesn’t seem possible, I thought Jaynes did a pretty good job of explaining how it won’t work.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it would work if Hedo played the Travis role and backed up LMA. If not, then it doesn’t work.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
idk
it still seems like too many minutes for too many players.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems like a moderately effective 9 man rotation.
Either way, if Rudy isn’t traded. He has earned more minutes and the 6th man role.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Outlaw had 27.7 minutes per game last year.
That sounds about right for Hedo to me.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
u forgot about Martell, & to think theres no shot he gets minutes is unreasonable, most observers said he "outmanned & outmuscled" Batum before the season started
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Jul 2, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
read down - I didn't forget him
but fine, plug Martell in instead of Batum. We still have the same problem.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here is another alternative that includes Martell
Pos
1 Blake/Bayless 34 Roy 14
2 Roy 24 Rudy 24
3 Web 20 Nic 15 Turk 13
4 LMA 30 Turk 18
5 Oden 28 Pryz 14 LMA 6
This is a very versatile lineup that is adjustable for team and game time situations.
I am not promoting this – I am solidly in the no-Turk camp but it can work.
by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
10 man rotation?
not for long…something’s gotta give eventually. Nic needs more that 15mpg, Rudy needs more that 24mpg, Bayless could soon want/need more than 14mpg.
yeah, maybe we could try that for a couple months, but we would only be driving down the trade value of some of these guys.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why does Batum need more than 15 mpg?
At this point he’s nothing more than an offensively challenged defender. If there are better guys in front of you on the depth chart, you don’t get minutes.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in a couple of months, someone will get dinged up
Seriously, I think GMs tend to “overstock” their rosters in case of injury. How many times do you hear that a winning team “weathered the storm” of injuries because they had quality depth?
The coach and the fans may complain about “too many players, not enough minutes” and you can be sure the young players and their agents want all the PT they can get so they can “cash in” at contract time. Meanwhile, the GM just tries to smooth over PT conflicts and waits for somebody to get hurt to “resolve” the issue.
The best solution? Mix in some vets who know their role and shut their mouth and sit around until their number is called. Those are the kind of guys who win playoff series, not the 20-25 year-olds, anyway…
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love the use of "Quotations"
I was thinking of the Farley bit…
I don’t “practice” good “hygene”…
I don’t “brush” my teeth"…
"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake
by RudyisSick! on Jul 2, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i did elsewhere, but here goes again
PG Blake 24, Bayless 16, Rudy 8
SG Roy 26, Rudy 22
SF Hedo 18, Batum 20, Roy 10
PF LMA 34, Hedo 14
C Greg 28, Joel 18, LMA 2
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we count on Rudy playing 8 minutes at the PG?
I like Rudy’s play making abilities, but he did terrible at that spot when he played there last year. If this goes down I would love to be proved wrong though.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he could if Turkoglu and Roy are actually running the point and he’s just defending it.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
call Roy the PG for those 8 minutes if you want. it doesn’t matter. the point is that its a roy/rudy backcourt
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that would be a very intriguing end of game lineup.
Turk-Roy-Rudy-LMA-Oden
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which went badly last year.
If Hedo can improve that by being a ball handler, okay. I can see why you would try it. Still a little leery of it though.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hedo could
That could indeed be the missing link. Turkoglu played a lot of PG when Jameer Nelson got injured. Wow, I actually hadn’t thought about that 4th quarter lineup. It excites me.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup, that is the lineup i like...
assuming that turkey is coming to pdx (which i do not support b/c contract). i’d be able to get behind sharing the PG duties b/w turk and roy, with rudy being there to help take it up if necessary. in fact, i think that would be the blazers best lineup (including potential free agents and the terrible kirk hinrich types). i think rudy still comes off the bench, but should be playing the majority of the 2nd half like with the other starters.
by retirecards51 on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but but but!!!!
who gets the 2 extra minutes at the 2 guard you didn’t give to Roy or Rudy!
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where's Martell?
Assuming he’s healthy. Where are his minutes?
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats the problem I've been pointing out for two days
Signing Hedo mean Travis is gone for sure, and one of two other things is happening:
Either Martell will not be ready to play come fall, OR someone from the Martell/Rudy/Batum trio is going to be sitting the bench or traded.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably Martell
For a backup PF I would hope, or PG.
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
except martell has basically no trade value right now
my guess is whoever is moved is part of a package with Outlaw
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wouldn't make much sense sending away two SFs in a trade together.
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless we sign a SF as a free agent...
which is sorta what we are trying to do.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't bank on him not being healthy.
Also, his trade value would be fairly low. I hardly think that Batum in his second year ranks higher and deserves more minutes than Webster. That’s one reason why i don’t quite understand this purchase.
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly, me either
which leads to one of 3 conclusions:
1) Martell won’t be ready, and the team knows it
2) Someone from the Rudy/Batum/Martell trio is getting traded (along with Outlaw)
3) KP and team are screwing up big time by allowing a valuable player to rot on the bench.
My hope is that it’s (2), my fear is that it’s (1), and my nightmare is that it’s (3)
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Realistically I think it's #3.
With the idea that it may be #1.
I still think Martell is too young to give up on, 4 years in (really 3) out of highschool, has several years left to hit his prime. Good affordable contract. His work ethic is amazing, talks about focusing on his defensive abilities. He could become a well rounded player. Bringing in Hedo is counter-intuitive.
I don’t believe conclusion #2 is realistic. Rookie contract, rookie contract, and $4 mil contract with low trade value respectively. Not good trade chips but all high potential players.
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like D
D) we don’t know anything
blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter
by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We really don't.
But what we do know is what’s scaring me.
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wrote a whole fanpost on that
Demonstrating how much I didn’t know. Again.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Jul 2, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
WE don't know, but I sure hope KP and crew do
They likely have a pretty good inkling on Martell’s status. They darn well better have some follow-up plans in place to signing Hedo. Thus, while (3) is the worst case, it also seems the most unlikely to me. This team does it’s homework. they aren’t floundering around making moves in a vacuum like Chris Wallace (dumping Gasol’s 33 million contract just so they can end up getting ZBo’s 34 million)
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He would get close...
I’d say he’d get close to 36 minutes a game + or – a few. If we blow our cap space and give this guy close to 50 million it’s going to be for him to be a starter and play starter minutes. I’d expect that at the very least until Hedo is closer to his Mid 30’s and also closer to the end of his contract here, he’s playing the starter minutes very comparable to Brandon and LMA.
Also with Hedo, it might be about the money. But in General I’d say Dwight is incorrect to say it is ALWAYS about the money. What have we seen here? Pryzbilla chose Portland, when equal or better money could of been had. Rudy sacrificed significant Euro’s to come play for Portland. So it’s rare, but clearly NOT ALWAYS about the money.
On the other end of the spectrum we have Canzano’s contention that we need to convince Hedo that Portland has good Pizza, and point out that we have rivers? Equally as ridiculous.
Somewhere between Dwight and Canzano is the truth. My feeling. Borrow one of Paul Allens Yachts, take Hedo down the beautiful Willamette all the while serving him Pizza covered in money .
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on Jul 2, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I felt like I used to be able to rely on Dwight for substance… he always struck me as a solid meat and potatoes writer, but lately he seems a little more sensationalistic (maybe from hangin around bojack and the 95.5 crew too much?).
Last time I read or listened to Canzano, he was nowhere near the truth. Has he changed? Actually no don’t tell me, I don’t care.
I think Krang is closest to the truth. And yes it’s mostly but not 100% about the Benjamins.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jul 2, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
could you imagine Paul Allen's
Octopus yaucht rolling down the Willamette this afternoon? lol

Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The poll options are too specific.
No likey.
SAY NO TO HEDO.
by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
There has to be another option. These all suck.
It took my two years to come up with an avatar and sig
and this is the best I could come up with.
by einman77 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a well constructed poll.
In real life all the choices always suck.
by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently Turkoglu actually rates as a really good defender.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He's actually a pretty good positional defender.
He doesn’t have super athleticism or anything, so he’s not the kinda guy who makes highlight reel blocks, but he’s good at staying in front of his man and placing himself in areas that disrupt passing lanes. He does lack quickness, however. Faster SF’s can give him trouble.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I generally agree……. he’s not Rodman, but he’s not the Radman.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's so damn big
A legit 6’10 forward, and he did play under Stan Van Gundy. Not as good as Ariza, but I think Hedo is akin to Hinrich on defense. Tougher than expected, won’t back down from better players, and won’t be embarrassed to get burned or dunked on.
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich has much better defensive instincts and intensity
From a physical standpoint, you’re pretty close to right, but Hinrich is a far better defender in terms of mentality.
That said, I’d be very, very happy with a Hinrich/Roy/Hedo 1-2-3 with Rudy and Batum as the bench guys
by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I had to choose between Ariza and Turk, I'd say Ariza
Not only does that hurt the Lakers, but he seems like a better fit. $40 million is way too much money though.
The free agent money should instead be spent upgrading the PG and getting a backup PF. SF doesn’t seem like as big as need as those holes, especially if we have Martell back and healthy (which is a moderate sized if at this point)
by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But if we can get a scorer
I’d take that to take the pressure off #7.
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't the hope be...
…that LMA and Oden (especially Oden) further develop their offensive games to alleviate the scoring pressure on Roy. Of course, that doesn’t help in terms of perimeter scoring, which Turk would do.
It just boils down to whether you think we need to upgrade the defense (my choice) or the offense.
by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turkoglu is a statistically good defender.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I caught wind of this earlier.
Do you have the numbers per chance? Not to question you, just to satisfy my own curiosity at your expense.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely. Here’s a breakdown of Turkoglu’s defensive stats from the guys at Third Quarter Collapse.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you.
I’m pretty lazy sometimes.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, I don’t put a whole lot of weight into defensive stats. It’s just an interesting point for the crowd trying to figure out why KP wants Hedo.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we should make trades to "hurt another team"
Also, Isn’t Ariza just as likely to get picked up by another team (a la Toronto) if we don’t get him. Damage done. Lakers are over cap, so they need to downsize, Ariza wants full pay.
I hate the idea of Ariza coming to P-town after what he did to Rudy. Not sure if it’s rumors or what, but if the Hedu trade “infuriated” Rudy, how do you think he would like Ariza coming to town?
"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake
by RudyisSick! on Jul 2, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What what what???
Back to Devin Harris real quick: would you like to see him running the break with Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge? Many would. Because he could have been had on draft night. The New Jersey Nets were reportedly shopping him for expiring contracts and draft picks. Not sure if he is still on the market, but it’s worth Kevin Pritchard inquiring about with Rod Thorn.
That is from the Wendell Maxey link above from Ben. I can’t believe that KP would not pull the trigger to get Harris on Draft night if all it would have taken was some expiring deals/low cost players. And if that is still the case, then Blake+Outlaw would work under the 125%+$100K rule to get him here, and they both expire this year for NJ. Get that deal done KP!
PS: I can’t believe this to be true, just too crazy that a player like Harris would be available for so little.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the rumors said they want a young PG on a rookie contract back
so maybe that’s the hangup. Im assuming we would throw bayless into that offer in a heartbeat, but maybe they don’t think he’s the guy for them. perhaps after a strong summer league running the piont, they can be persuaded to change their mind?
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that is the case
then by all means throw bayless into that deal, it still works under the CBA.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
if the rumors are true, and KP hasn’t offered NJ Outlaw, picks, and Euros, plus their choice of Bayless/Blake and Rudy/Batum then I’d be disappointed. Batum would be the one guy I would hesitate on, but I’d probably still do it
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should send NJ Euros...
Right now they are stronger then the dollar by quite a bit.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you can do that deal with some combination of
Bayless, Outlaw, Rudy, Blake, cash and picks, you need to pull the trigger.
by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Brainer.
Blake, Outlaw, Bayless and any future 1st rounders they want, absolutely. After being reminded this year of what 1st round picks do for good teams (nothing) they could send out the next 5 picks for all I care.
Then sign Turkey and Anthony Carter with the cap space.
Harris / Rudy / Carter
Roy / Rudy
Turk / Batum / Martell
LaMarcus / Pendergraph
Oden / Prz
Championship.
by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep
your comment, and those above about this same topic all tell me what I think we all already knew…
no way this deal was available to KP, or it would have been done.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be a beyond nasty team
I might go a different way with the depth PG, but that’s a minor part of it.
by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't have the kind of crappy expiring deals anymore other teams do and are easily willing to part with
KP doesn’t want to throw Blake and Travis away, obviously. The last such contract we had was Raef.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That it is Maxey reporting it carries some weight.
Except for the fact that he’s reporting it as a rumor. Reportedly shopping him. That’s the classic unattributed comment reference. For all we know, someone called up Thorn and asked if Harris could be had. Thorn says “What are you offering?” That becomes “New Jersey is reportedly shopping Harris.”
My rule number 1 in discussing possible trade or FA signing moves – believe nothing that you hear. What will be will be.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this explains the Hedo signing
Like others, I’m still not convinced we’re going to sign Hedo and try to fit him in without another major trade already set up. Two of our current small forwards would need to go to make room for him. A combination of Outlaw, Bayless, Webster, and other low-cost contracts/picks/cash might be slated to go already for Harris. Which would leave us with Harris/Blake, Roy/Fernandez, Hedo/Batum, LMA/(Pendergraph or TBD), Oden/Przybilla.. great rotation.
by amitp06 on Jul 2, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Hedoism
Which I’m quite fine with. We need another scorer to take pressure off of Roy.
Oh and Rudy, don’t worry, you’ll get your minutes.
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Turk
50 mill is too much, but what you are paying for is the fact that of this free agent class, he is the only guy who is multidimensional. Everybody else is a one trick pony. Ben Gordon? Only scores. C-nuva? Scores. Ariza? Defends. Turkoglu is the only one that can both get his own shot and create for others.
A crunch time lineup of Roy/Fernandez/Turkoglu/ Lamarcus/Oden would be much harder to defend than what we had last year. Acquiring Hedo makes us better.
Defense wasn’t the problem in the playoffs, it was that all you had to do to beat the Blazers was manhandle Roy because no one else could facilitate.
by JPop on Jul 2, 2009 9:53 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
ya know
and its not really a knock on blake and outlaw, its just that those two are limited offensively. Outlaw is an end point scorer with limited passing and handling ability and Blake is an outlet three guy. Not necessarily a bad thing unless you ask them to shoulder the responsibility of running an offense.
by JPop on Jul 2, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
rec
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Jul 2, 2009 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yet Twith will be laughing an evil blazer fan laugh if we meet Lebron & Artest in the finals this year, and Artest dominates H*DO...
not out of the realm of possibility
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Jul 2, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm torn on that one.
Big plus on defense, potential big minus on offense. Always depends which Ron shows up: good passing, post-up Ron or launch the off balance deep 3 early in the shot clock Ron.
by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For some reason, it wouldn't surprise me if the Cleveland Cavaliers and the Houston Rockets did a ...
sign-and-trade deal wherein the ballclubs swapped Anderson Varejao and Ron Artest. With Artest on the Cavaliers, LeBron James would transition to a combo forward on both ends of the court. The Cavaliers could then sign Rasheed Wallace to the mid-level exception and have a three-man rotation at the forward positions of James, Artest, and Wallace.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harris
Right now, I’m fine with our group of small forwards, assuming Martell comes back healthy. I just really want to pick up Devin Harris. Please?
by roynfernandez on Jul 2, 2009 9:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
John Canzano's article in the Oregonian this morning is pure fluff.
Ridiculous. Oh, let’s show Hedo we’re down with Turkish culture so he’ll play here. PLEASE. How about you do a real story, JC?
Hedo should be trying to impress us. I swear if he gets a 5/50 deal, I’ll puke.
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 10:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Its a real as anything JC ever does
At least he’s not hating on us for no reason this time.
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
I guess you didn’t listen to his radio show last night. He had some guy on there who was a Turkey “expert” to talk about what the Blazers should do to so Hedo that Portland is a great place for a Turkish player! Sometimes that guy is just a moron.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Funny you mention that.
I sent in a text saying the interview was a horrible waste of time. He actually replied back via text: “I don’t think so.”
What a clown.
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I flipped the dial at that point.
I think Hedo’s an alright player, but I don’t know why it’s so important to jock Turkey like it’s actually a cool country or something.
And as far as the lack of Turkish restaurants in Portland (as mentioned in his article), could it be because Turkish food sucks?!
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
- from Quick's Behind the Blazers Locker Room Door, 4/16/09
by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but
according to Canzano’s Turkish “expert” Turkey is all about the food!
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t know. I was just disappointed when I picked up an atlas as a kid and found a map of Turkey, only to find that it was not in fact shaped like the outline of a turkey.
Friggin’ jerks. That would’ve been awesome.
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
- from Quick's Behind the Blazers Locker Room Door, 4/16/09
by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess it depends on your definition of cool ...
… but I have friends who have visited Turkey and think it is very cool.
And as a history buff, I can tell you Turkey is about as cool as it gets.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
musicians I know that have studied music in Turkey
come back to the US sounding a lot better. – Elgin
Without you out there, we're nowhere here
by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what did the expert have to say?
That turkey isn’t just for Thanksgiving anymore?
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do we care so much about Turkey's price?
The Blazers will be handcuffed cap-wise for the indefinite future, regardless of what they do this summer. If you want them to do something else with that $8M Italic phrasethis summer_Italic phrase_ then great. If you’re expecting something else grand over the next year or two, it isn’t happening.
Hedo at 4 years $32M vs. 5 years $50M won’t make any difference in what they do over that period, it will only impact Paul Allen’s wallet. The price is virtually irrelevant.
by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup I mean we'll max out Roy, LMA and probably Oden
In the next few years anyways.
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it is a big deal
If the Blazers want to renounce all of their exceptions and players they can actually get down to about $49 million or just under in salary cap salaries. That means if they do that, then sign Hedo to an $8 million per year deal, (which will start below $8 million in the first year most likely) their team salary would go up to about a max $57 million, (although depending on the contract it could be as little as $55 million) and depending on the salary cap number they could still be under it slightly, maybe even slightly enough to sign another FA, (possibly a back up PF?) or make a trade that uses that cap space, etc…
So it is important for flexiblilty later this same summer, if they give him a $10 million per avg that flexability will be gone.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see that...
My point though was that Turkey for $10M is much more useful than no Turkey and some role players. There isn’t really another starter-quality player available through free agency, and they already have plenty of role players.
by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair point, but - meh - I'm not worried
If KP thinks Hedo is not the final piece, then there is no way he’d sign him to a deal that prevents further movement.
The cap space will probably be soaked up one way or the other, either through FA signings or imbalanced trades. I believe they will use it wisely.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jul 2, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade value
If we sign him to a huge contract and then decide we don’t want him any more in a year or two, he’ll be impossible to trade. If we sign him to a reasonable contract though, he could be a valuable trade asset.
by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
zach randolph just got trade again
he makes $17 million per. I would never say trading Hedo in 3 years, when he’s got 2 years left at 10-11 per is impossible.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zach got traded for garbage, I believe.
by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the clips picked up a 9 million dollar 2010 expiring
and dumped 25 million is salary obligations. That’s nothing to sneeze at.
My point is this, IF Hedo has wilted 3 years from now, and/or others have overtaken him, the prospects of moving his 2 year, 24 million dollar contract is not going to be much different than moving his 2 year, 20 million dollar deal.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if Hedo wilts, it is reasonable to assume he will be a competent back-up
I still say no to Hedo, but he is still a quality NBA player in the right system.
by Sonic Boom on Jul 2, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
WHY WHY WHY?
Can anyone answer why we are even considering a SF when we have Batum And Webster and Outlaw, and why we arent looking at a PG and a backup PF?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe because...
Turk is a pretty big upgrade at the SF position and provides some valuable veteran leadership.
by lrh86 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
define "pretty big upgrade"
Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ill try
1) Outlaw will never where a blazer uniform again. book it
2) Webster may not be ready to go come fall
3) Batum isn’t ready for 36 minutes per game
4) This team desperately needs another player who can create offense and score the ball. Hedo is the best available guy who can do both those things, and he won’t cost us any players to get.
5) backup PF is a secondary or tertiary need – we are talking about 12 minutes a game here. Either we think the rookies can cover it, ore more likely we are going to slot Hedo into most of those minutes to create mismatches and get more time on the floor for our talented wing players.
6) upgrading the PG position in the way we would like is likely not feasible at this time, and/or too costly
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
hehe *wear*, not *where*
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec.
If a major upgrade at PG isn’t available (priority 1), a major upgrade at SF is the next best thing. The opportunity is this summer. Do something now or ride with what you’ve got…I’d rather do something now.
by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
With every one of your points, potentially barring the last one. Something could have already been agreed upon.
by TheMadKiwi on Jul 2, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well that's my hope
but I"m trying to address the original points without speculating on any possible follow ups
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
great addtion
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"3) Batum isn’t ready for 36 minutes per game"
Next year maybe not.
But is Batum backup material for the next 5 years?……NOT!
You will lose his intensity and drive to be better and him in the short run to another team.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
but if Hedo gets 4 years, the middle of year 3, Nic takes over and Hedo comes off the bench.
Then Hedo is traded as an expiring contract in the 4th year. Nic should be able to see the logic in that.
by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you think Batum would sign an extension or new contract after gettings scraps here for three years?
Would you?
by raoulduke on Jul 2, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we can pretty much force him to stay for a long time, happy or not. he’ll be restricted.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think of our Cap space at that time
Roy, LA, and Oden would be maxed and Hedo at $10 mil.
You think the Blazer would even try to match other team’s offers?
NOT a chance.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Batum probably won't be truly a quality starter
For at least another two years and more likely three. At this point Turkoglu would be slowing down and needing fewer minutes (I’m assuming), so he can become a high-level 6th man and Batum can start.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that your hope to make this deal sound positive for the future?
You must not have watched very many other 1st year starters.
Remember Batum played previously in Europe and the poise and confidence you noticed,
if you had been watching closely, was/is rare.
Remember also that Batum was suppose to split minutes with other players
(Roy, Rudy, Webster, and Outlaw).
All of that mix of talent was suppose to be a plus for any coach.
The problem was not enough minutes to go around.
Now there could be only 15-19 minutes to spread around.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
After ruminating, I do feel slightly better knowing that if we do sign H*DO for a big contract...
it will allow us to trade him as an expiring contract in a few years, to some team that wants to unload a player who will actually help us in our run, we could toss in a draft pick & cash as sweeteners
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hedo is not going to get a 5/$50 deal
Everything that we have heard in the media concerning the length and size of his contract was floated by his agent. The original story, released tuesday, quoted the agent as the source of the 5/50$ deal. Now that Toronto, Detroit and Orlando have all pulled out of the Hedo sweepstakes, we are essentially bidding in a vacuum, with know competition to drive up the price. I believe that we could sign him to a 5/45$ or even a 4/$36 deal.
Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.
by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 10:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
perhaps a lowball offer?
Hedo gave up 7.3, but to “secure the future for his family” means length and total contract. Hopefully, the door is still open for negotiation as I would suppose the Blazers want to know if he is interested before offering a specific amount. Hedo and Babby will certainly listen to other offers as well.
So, try to sell him on Portland’s future, good locker room, stability, and need to improve the team with some remaining cap flexibility; perhaps starting at 7 and escalating 20% for 4 or 5 years, or starting with 8 or 9 and reducing (as Hinrich did at Chicago). If he simply accepts the max contract, let him shop around.
If all else fails, keep the cap space and shop at the trade deadline for the best player from all those teams already out of the playoffs. I LIKE THIS OPTION BEST!!
Also, with Gordon going to Detroit, Chicago will now keep Hinrich for a 3 man rotation with Rose and Salmons.
by kacee on Jul 2, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think a frontloaded contract would be ideal
Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.
by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you have to go 4 years - so in 3 when he diminishes in value on the court he will have huge value as an expiring contract
Heck – maybe KP says our window gloriously open in 3 years and that sort of trade could be huge to get the last piece. Maybe Turk is the bandaide.
by Sonic Boom on Jul 2, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been on the fence about Hedo, but at this point..
I’ve got to assume that they have exhausted all of their options of making some sort of lopsided trade and have decided to go after the FA they felt would best help the team and spend that money now. Lord knows they won’t have that money next year when they max out Roy and Aldridge and then Oden the year after that. So I guess, it’s do something now or not do something later. I’m going to put my faith in KP and his staff that they know what they are doing (most likely they understand bb a lot better than I do). Heck, they had a 54 win team with practically all draft picks. And there are a few good things about Hedo that this team needs.
1. Veteran with playoff experience
2. Pick and Roll with GO (AKA the next Dwight Howard)
3. Has a good rebound average considering Dwight Howard was his teammate.
4. Has a good assist average considering Jameer Nelson was his teammate (granted he was out for half of the year)
5. Is versatile and can play different positions
6. Good ball handler
7. Good passer
8. Plays team basketball
9. Good locker room personality
Time will tell if this is a good move, but I’m reserving judgement until I’ve seen them play together for a little while.
by jenstcy on Jul 2, 2009 11:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Pick and Roll possibilities have me salivating
Side PnR with Hedo and GO with LMA spotting up midrange or corner 3
Pick and Pop with Roy and LMA, Roy and Hedo
also imagine the baseline plays and backdoor cuts we could run with the ball in Hedo’s hands. The difference between Hedo on Orlando and Hedo in Portland is that the opponents can’t put their best perimeter defender on Hedo (i.e. Ariza). Since the Roy Wonder demands attention from 1-3 players at all times, the lane is going to be more open for Turkoglu drives and inversely the same will be true for Roy.
I also think that getting Hedo will allow us to keep Blake and not regret it later. Blake is one of the best 3 point shooters in the league, and all of the PGs we are looking at (save Hinrich) are subpar deep shooters. With Hedo and Roy on the floor, Blake’s lack of playmaking ability will mostly become a dead issue. With all that said, I wouldn’t mind hinrich as PG, since he replicates most of Blake’s role with the added bonus of better defense. I believe we will have to deal one or more of our current SFs, for the sake of playing time and waste, but the target will probably be a veteran PF and not a PG.
Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.
by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly.
This move gives us an offense. I know BEdgers will say we had the #1 offense last year, but it had little balance, and proved to be our downfall in the playoffs.
I have been saying that this was a problem with our offensive philosophy which is very conservative. Nate Mcmillen would probably defend that he hasn’t had the personnel to diversify the offense.
That’s probably why Nate is high on Turkoglu. Because he would do just that: diversify and balance the offense.
And if he can do this, he’s worth all of that.
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's more situational than anything else.
Houston is a tough offensive matchup for anybody, especially considering their two best defenders were glued to our #1 player the entire series.
I don’t think we would have had the offensive stalls we had in the Houston series if we played any of the other 6 teams in the playoffs, Lakers included.
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, in NBA games, you get in to situations! ;)
You’re free to disagree, as you seem inclined to. But these issues were there all of last season. Not just against Houston. Our game works against the poor-mid level teams in the league. But we are solvable. Houston solved us. But another elite team would have as well.
Fundamentally: If you don’t play a team offense that can adapt to the other team taking away your first, second options, you’re going to lose. I thought we began to develop a team offensive identity as the season progressed, but whenever faced with adversity, we retreated to the BRoy show. And that simply won’t do it.
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Blazin' is 100% right
I’ve been saying it all year. We got more than we could ever hope for out of our stagnant isolation-based offense with only one creator on the roster. I think our offensive efficiciency is much more of a testament to our individual abilities and offensive rebounding prowess than to any good offensive scheme or design.
our “#1 offense in the leauge” rating was always fool’s gold – come playoff time, teams ratchet up the defense and take away your first options. We had no reliable second options to go to.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not that we shouldn't try to be more ready for the elite playoff defenses last year, but it does need to be mentioned that we drew the worst possible matchup
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ie I'm fine with adding another creator to the offense and I do think its important
… but that playoff series shouldn’t change what we learned from 82 games— defense needs to be a higher priority than offense for this team.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree on the defense
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think a very high priority is to improve our performance in the early parts of games. Much of that is attributed to needing a second playmaker.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
Houston exposed this weakness more than most other teams, but even had we gotten past them, it would have been similarly exposed.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have liked our chances against the Lakers.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
our offense would have looked better
but I don’t think we had enough defense last year to sniff a win at Staples.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are most likely right.
But I was of the opinion that Portland matched up against LA better than anyone else in the west. I’d have to agree that it would not have changed the outcome, but then funny things can happen. Had we faced LA in the second round, perhaps Karma would have made an appearance at Staples.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Houston is a tough offensive matchup for anybody
No doubt, they gave L*A more trouble than anyone else, and that was WITHOUT Yao for much of the series
Portland, OTOH, had to face Ming at the peak of his game
Little has changed for me, since the end of game 6: I still support upgrading the roster and not “standing pat”. The “Outlaw experiment” should be over and a better PG than Blake would be nice. (But if Hedo is signed, I suspect the Blazers may feel like they have “enough” at the starting/backup PG position with Steve and Jerryd)
So, if KP can bring in a couple of veterans at PF/C and at #3 PG that may be “it” for roster improvement. We’ll see
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Webster's gonna take the pressure off
I think we’re forgetting about how good of a shooter Webster is, which is gonna take the double teaming off Roy and LA a ton (not all the time, but more than last year). Plus, who knows how many three’s we’re gonna get because of him.
No to Hedo
by DJRazorburn on Jul 2, 2009 11:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers are not counting to get much if anything from Martell next season or they wouldn't be shopping for a SF
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
or they have a follow up consolidation trade in the works
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's Understand this more than salaries and stats
In the entertainment industry, there are multiple angles to the same result. After reading some people’s replies over the last few days, there have been some great points, but what I think we all are missing, is the practicality of it all.
KP is the GM. Seats need to be filled at the Rose Garden, and what better way to increase hype over last year than to bring on a luxury name item like a Hedo. That’s why I see this as being attractive. Sure, it may hurt cap space, and it probably cripples the Blazers for a while, but they’re a young team. I guarantee you that as much as we may love them now, if they every DO win a championship, it won’t be with the current roster. The Phoenix Suns were in the same predicament, they needed to revamp their roster, so they brought on Nash, an aging but still efficient guard, they had a promising big man in Amar’e, and then they had Marion.
You can say it didn’t work, but the concept is the same, from a business perspective. They filled seats, they got primetime TV, they sold jerseys, and they increased their status. They played a fast-paced, uptempo style that got them far, but not far enough.
What’s my point? It’s simple. In order to keep a fan base happy, a team needs to show progress. The Knicks stink. They were worse before though, and the fans lost total interest. Bring in Mike D’Antoni, David Lee breaks out, and Robinson flourishes in that style of play, and suddenly, they’re getting better, and they’re generating interest.
It’s different in PDX because fans there are loyal. People loved the Blazers through the dark ages of Rip City, and will continue to love them still – but from a GM perspective, you HAVE to do something to “improve” from last year.
Put it this way: If the Blazers don’t make a move, they are counting that experience alone will pay off and they can increase their performance over last year. That’s possible, but in that example, if the don’t crush their record from last year, then people will be here, and on the radio, and on TV, saying that they SHOULD have done something. If they do worse than last year, then it’s disaster, because it totally undermines their reputation as an up and coming team, and transforms them into fluke overachievers, both results are detrimental to the team and the public image.
This puts the Blazers in a tough spot. If they DO sign someone like Hedo, it’s great for sales of tickets, and it puts Portland on the map. Like him or not, he’s pretty much A-list NBA caliber at this point, being that he was a main player on a team that went to the championships. Think Mo Williams here, sidekick to Lebron maybe, but still a great player. I won’t bother making size, stat or performance observations in this post, because I don’t think there’s a right answer, it’s all opinion.
Hedo brings you instant media coverage, instant buzz, and an instant jump up the NBA’s totem pole. With Hedo you start getting respect of other teams, referee’s, and other fans. The Blazers go from being a young up and coming team with a lone star in Brandon Roy, to suddenly, the surging powerhouse with Hedo, Roy and LA.
This is why I think it’s a BAD move. It’s strictly PR based. The Blazers have to know that they’re not ready to win anything yet. They’re a good 3 years from peaking at their current roster if they continue to improve, and you can’t win with Roy, LA, and Hedo. Oden is still an unknown commodity, Outlaw’s defense is suspect, and Batum is still developing.
Bringing Ariza in would improve defense, but it doesn’t make sense, because the Blazers need to add players who contribute to their potency, not just lock down the perimeter. They already play good defense, I mean, c’mon, are people already forgetting we beat the Lakers? Outlaw is a weak link, but he’s vital in an offensive scheme because it’s like a shooting Marion, he can play multiple positions, he’s gifted athletically, and better yet, he’s improving and isn’t a diva like Marion has eluded to being.
I think the best move is the bite the bullet, don’t make a major commitment to a big name player this year, work on Greg, Jerryd, and Travis, and then make your move next year. Martell is still on the fence, but maybe he comes back and works back into the rotation. You can use Rudy experimentally to see what exactly one could get from him at the NBA level, and then you leave yourself open to nab a marquee player to accompany Roy when they’re more experienced and ready to make a serious run deep into the Playoffs.
I’d hate to see the Blazers get impatient at the last minute and sign away the future of the team, because we’d just end up where we were 7 years ago, losing to teams in the Playoffs with big name players who have huge contracts, and we’ve worked so hard to break away from that mold.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:00 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
KP, is that you?
Haha. Nice post.
I miss Martell. Come back soon!
by mannyfresh1 on Jul 2, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now from a basketball perspective
The Blazers are at a crossroads I think. They need to determine how they want to succeed. They have players who serve roles in different styles of play, as now as they are getting better, they need to address this.
Players like Roy like half court, controlling the ball and penetrating. Jerryd can do that too, with work, and create his own shot. Without 1 on 1 players though, if you play half court offense, there will always be a lot of standing around. They need to decide, are they going to run more, get out on the break and use their athletic wing players for scoring and add a quality PG who can distribute on a break (Kidd, Nash, Harris, etc) or do they want a player who can add to their half court set (Hedo).
You can’t keep a Travis, Nicholas, or a Rudy on a leash in the half court. They’re built to run, and while Nick has found a way to be a good defender with his abilities, Travis is a scorer, and defense will always be his weak point. He should be in a situation like the Knicks or the Suns, a team who will get out on the break and use his leaping abilities. Trying to shove him into a set play and take jumpshots cripples his potential.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Thank u. I have been saying this for some time, perhaps not as effectively as you.
It has seemed to me that KPs fascination with Spanish players who are bred to play a more dynamic, pass oriented (think Steve Nash) type offense is at odds with the style of the coach and the star player on the team, Brandon Roy.
It is why I don’t think Rudy really fits on this team.
It is why I think the front office has some issues to sort out that are as important as anything else for this team to get to the next level.
It is also why, I think signing Hedo is probably a good move. Because it will bring some definition to this problem.
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
It’s ironic, because KP helped with the Spurs, who normally aren’t a running team. They have a great coach though, who makes it work.
Ginobili is funny, because he’s a tweener with styles. He can run and spot up , but he’s not really quick like more wing/SG players who play in a running style. He’s not slow, but he’s more deliberate, which is why it works.
You can always have an uptempo PG, because if he’s pass first, all it creates are matchup problems for the other team, because he can get his own shot with quickness, tire out defenders, and pull the bigger, better defenders off of the SG/SF and let them be effective.
There’s a lot more to basketball than just stats. Hedo is a great move for 2-3 years max, but don’t expect him to be a great deal at 5 yrs/50 mil when we have a huge free agency period coming in a year and you have great potential role players. I feel adding a big player at this point is too early and will lead to problems.
(See, Shaq in PHX)
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A nice argument. But I see a couple glaring holes in it.
1) Portland doesn’t have to “crush” their record from last season. In fact if they repeat the number of wins they will be going well. And considering how they played the last month of the season, particularly with regard to point differential, and there is good reason to believe they will improve on last year’s record.
2) Hedo isn’t really an A-lister, as you put it. I’m not sure he’s ever made an All-Star roster. He’s certainly in the spotlight right now, but that’s more a combination of his being one of the very few FA’s that’s deemed of interest in a poor crop of FA’s and of the recentness of his appearing in the Finals. Both of those spotlights are the sort that fade very quickly. Come December, no one is going to be tuning into the Blazers because of Hedo hype, unless he’s performing at a level that has the Blazer’s red hot.
3) Based on his record to date, I don’t see where Kevin Pritchard or Paul Allen, for that matter, value media hype and the spotlight over putting together a team with a chance at a title. In fact everything so far says that Pritchard is all about taking the patient, long term approach. Sure he is aware of PR, but I challenge anyone to show where it is appaent that PR has been the primary factor driving any of Pritchard’s personnel decisions.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those aren't hole...
1. If you don’t agree, then simply, you’re acknowledging mediocrity. You cannot simply duplicate with no progress. If they don’t post a better record, they will be slammed in the media, we all know that. Portland is attempting to rebuild not only their team, but their entire image, which plays a huge part of it.
2. Hedo is an A-lister. There are pluses and minuses, after all. How you say he’s not an A-lister is ridiculous. He was the leader in assists on the team that lost to the champions. If that doesn’t put you right at the top of the list, then I guess quit the NBA now, because nobody is Kobe, Lebron or MJ. He also was a 6th man of the year nominee, and recently won Most Improved Player. He has a career high 39 points against the Raptors too. Last season he averaged 19.5 points, 5.7 rebounds and 5 assists per game while starting all 82 regular season games.
And you say that doesn’t make him A-list? Please.
As far as performance going into hype, of course, as with everything, if there is no performance, there is no publicity. What you refuse to see is that isn’t a “hole,” it’s just reality.
If I say I’m going to get drafted, I create some sort of fantastical hype. Then if I DO get drafted, I live up to my “expectations.” If I don’t, I lose credibility and respect, and probably get laughed on on ESPN too. The point is, you can’t say that since Hedo isn’t as big as one of the top 3 players in the NBA, he’s not a media generator. The fact is that while you may think the FA pool is “weak,” it still IS, meaning that regardless of the quality, the bigger name will still generate buzz, because that’s how media and PR works. If it was a bunch of WNBA players, it would be the same thing, and same with NHL, or MLB. It’s not the quality of the players, it’s the amount of media coverage that they have that generates the buzz.
While I understand what you’re saying, that is from a perspective of a results oriented argument, which is completely against what normal PR follows.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Hedo Turkoglu is an A-list NBA player, then Spencer & Heidi Pratt are A-list celebrities.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
As of now, they are beginning to be
Just because you hate them doesn’t mean they aren’t working their way up.
With the amount of publicity that carries with them, they have sure become them.
Look, there is a difference between being a quality player, and being an A-list player. Tmac is A list, but he’s injury prone so far. So are other players.
That doesn’t change the fact that right now, Hedo is the talk of the town, and everyone’s waiting to hear the news. If he returns to nothingness next year by not performing on the level that he did this year, and not getting to where he did, then he can go back to being on the C or D list-wherever you see him fit.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't care less about Tom Cruise, but I admit that he's an A-list celebrity.
On the other hand, though, Spencer & Heidi Pratt, Jon & Kate, and others of that ilk aren’t A-list celebrities, but rather a flavor of the month celebrity.
As an analogy, Tom Cruise : Kobe Bryant :: Jon & Kate : Hedo Turkoglu.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh whoa, you really just went there.
Point Ak.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lastly...
3.
Of course they value media reputation. Why else would they dismiss the prior Blazers and start fresh? Being in tune to media attention doesn’t have to equal going after only marquee players and signing them to big contracts. To think that the Blazers don’t do their best to generate buzz and media hype is crazy, haven’t you seen the big grain silo?
You can get two birds with one stone in this case, because the previous reputation was so bad that going towards a championship and getting media hype are both inter-connected! You can’t just sneak up and suddenly be a contender.
The point is, the Blazers need to somehow improve over last season, and if they don’t, they risk losing some steam that has been generated. With the drama surrounding Oden, there needs to be something to take the pressure off of him and Roy so that they can continue to develop. If you don’t get a player like Hedo, you’re shifting the focus back on the current players, which could be potentially dangerous to morale and public opinion, both of which are death sentences to coaches, GMs and team reputations. You may or may not agree that Hedo is top quality, but as far as media coverage goes, and expected potential if the Blazers do sign him, there’s no debating that, because it already has been established.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We can disagree whether or not Turkoglu is a top tier talent.
I’ve always been a fan of his and think he’s a very good player. But I’m not sure I would consider him a number 1 or number 2 option type guy. That would probably be a quick definition of what would consider “a-lister”.
I suppose we can disagree as to how important it is that Portland improve on this past season’s record. I will surely grant that there will be a portion of the fan base that will call for Nate’s head if the team doesn’t win more than 54 games. Those tend to be the sort of fans you can ignore, as you can never please them enough. But I will stand by the assertion that the Blazer’s do not have to crush last season’s win total. I’m not certain how you define crush, but that implies by a large margin. Improving by even a couple of victories will be a very successful achievement. One that most fans will be happy to accept.
As to your primary point of PR – I still think you are off the mark and have not done much to prove your case. I never said the Blazer’s do not value a good media reputation. In fact the evidence has shown that after what has occurred in the past, they once again “get” the importance of image and more importantly, a good relationship with their fans. However that is not the same thing as claiming Portland considers maintaining a PR driven sense of hype and excitement as the critical component of their strategy. Like any sports team they want to generate a buzz. But since the current management team has been in place, they have done nothing that I can recall to support the argument that maintaining a buzz is more important than assuring they have available both the best selection of personnel and the widest possible array of options, present and future.
I think I’m pretty safe in saying that for the majority of Portland basketball fans, the era of the Jailblazer days is in the past. There may still be hold outs, but for the most part, people have recognized that the team they onced loved is under new management and is again a group of young men they can give their hearts to. And as any real fan knows (and Portland has an abundance of real fans) your team can stumble from time to time and they will still have your love. And I suspect that the players are made of sterner stuff than you apparently give them credit for. I don’t see these guys suddenly folding and losing confidence, even if they get off to a rough start.
If you disagree, then please point to any evidence of Kevin Pritchard putting short term buzz ahead of a long term plan for success.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kicking other teams in the butt is the best buzz.
by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll back that position - every time.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Hedo deal goes through, there's your proof
I never said he’s had a track record of doing so in the past.
What I am saying though-is that it makes sense from a business perspective. KP is a GM, and GMs DO have to worry about other aspects.
Never did I say that they only care about the bottom line, or under-valued winning.
What I DID say though, is that from a GM perspective, one has to weigh in all the options, and Hedo right now brings in a lot of great PR. At this point, even if the Blazers don’t go after him, they can ride the press train for a while and perhaps enjoy some increase in their stock.
As was mentioned in another post here, there are variable aspects to this deal other than salary, contract lengths and performance. People, especially die hard fans, want to think that winning is the only thing that matters, but if that was the case, teams would be high into the luxury tax and nabbing as many good players as they could.
I also didn’t say they would lose confidence. There’s something that is missing from most people’s thought process, and that’s the fact that we are talking about professional sports! It’s fine for a player or a team to break out for a season, but why are so many players moved so quickly after? Why do players opt out? Because it’s common knowledge that in a lot of cases, these players or teams can easily slide back to their previous level of play very quickly.
Maintaining excellent play is harder than developing it, because you have to constantly be learning and getting better. You cannot simply just do the “same thing” as previous, because you’re basically losing ground. If I perform the same as I did last year, I didn’t tie, I actually lost, because professional sports, as with many other performance based activities are based on a slope, not a line.
Not to mention, NBA teams have excellent scouting, and now have had time to prepare, compare notes, and watch endless hours of game film on Brandon Roy, LA, etc, and will now come at them even harder than last year. Especially after the Houston performance, teams know what it will take to win against these guys, so unless there is some change made in the Portland management office, they run a high risk of them exposing their players to a long, tough season.
In no way am I hating on the players, but that’s just the reality of the situation, if they’re not improving, they’re going backwards. Especially when other teams are always hunting for their spot in the playoffs.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its like trading something you cooked for some Taco Bell.
What you cook might just be the best meal you are ever going to eat. But with the Taco Bell, you know what your going to get. It is going to be delicious.
The problem with Taco Bell is soon after you eat it, you just might feel awful. And if things go bad enough, you might just end up throwing up.
Whoa, it is definetly time for bed. I hope someone understands the point I tried to make.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One could claim
That KP’s methods are actually very reflective of a business relationship. Outsiders didn’t take kindly to the handling of the Miles situation.
Obviously I expect people here to jump on the bandwagon and defend our GM, and I’m not going to condemn either…but I think that the thought that the Blazers are 100% concerned with only the betterment of the team and not considering financial success at all is kind of crazy.
Read here: http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-milespritchard011709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers have to know that they’re not ready to win anything yet
That may be your opinion, but I don’t think it is shared by Paul Allen and Brandon Roy
Portland is not “that” far behind L*A and Cleveland (etc) Compare the Houston series when Portland battled against Yao and the L*ker series when the Rockets “lost” Yao but still forced a 7th game. The Blazers are not a good matchup for L*A, the L*kers haven’t won a game in Portland in years. And those losses were against a young team in rebuilding mode
The “window” is wide open, whether the “do nothing and let the cake bake” crowd wants to acknowledge it, or not. The only roster adjustment that remains for KP is to identify the “keepers” and add a veteran or two to help the kids get over in the playoffs.
And hey, that’s what I see him doing right now, in his pursuit of Turk
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can respect that
I would personally say the window is still a bit out, and I’d hate to see someone like Turk added that would shorten the window in the long term.
But hey, if they’re sure that adding him is enough to go to the Finals, then go for it. I’m just very far from convinced.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you
our window is open right now.
by Falcao on Jul 2, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Houston series was in no way close.
We were manhandled in the first round with home court advantage. If the championship window is open, there is no evidence of it.
by Blazin' on Jul 3, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hollinger
jay (portland, oregon)
Do you like the blazers going after Hedo?
John Hollinger: I like it .. not sure I love it. He’s not really a $50 million player or anything close to it, but he’s probably the best fit of the players available.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kelly Dwyer
[Comment From RB]
Can you please explain why Portland wants a 30 year old inefficent scorer? Help me with the logic.
KDonhoops: Because he was on TV a lot this spring. Sorry for being flip, but that’s what drives it. Every damn summer.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Skeets and Orlando's Ben Q Rock
[Comment From Ben Q Rock]
Love the reports that the “loser” of the Turkoglu sweepstakes probably winds up with Ariza. Because getting the younger, better player, more cheaply, is “losing.”
J.E. Skeets: Exactly. I’m going cry if my Raps sign Hedo to some crazy-ass, long-term deal. The whole thing just reeks of a Toronto Maple Leafs type move.
(That makes sense to about three of you.)
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Dwyer
KDonhoops: There’s no reason Batum can’t grow into a better player, and the Blazers can use that space on backcourt defenders.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
[Comment From Eric]
You think there’s anything to the “Rudy is pissed/leaving” rumors?
KDonhoops: It’s all agent talk, hoping for an earlier extension.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
[Comment From Jon L]
I thought Portland was supposed to fill out their roster with older role players now, not guys who need the ball.
KDonhoops: Why not a series of role players in their mid-20s? What’s the point of going for things now, only to regret it once Roy and Oden are in their primes?
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where are you hearing this?
Audio? TV?
I miss Martell. Come back soon!
by mannyfresh1 on Jul 2, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin Pritchard (PDX) What is the biggest downside of bringing in Hedo?
John Hollinger: The fact that he’s 30 and might stink in two years. That’s the downside potential.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony (New York) Why do the Blazers prefer Hedo to Ariza? It’s unclear Hedo and Roy will be a good match since they both need the ball in their hands to be at their best. Furthermore Ariza is cheaper, younger, and a better defender.
John Hollinger
Blazers desperately want another player who can create off the dribble so they’re not so ridiculously dependent on Roy, something Houston exposed in last year’s playoffs. So Hedo fits — the Blazers can even use the “no PG” lineup like Orlando did and play Rudy-Turk-Roy in the backcourt. As for Ariza, my presumption has been that LA would match any offer for Ariza, and despite the comments put out there yesterday it’s not clear to me that LA really isn’t willing to go past midlevel for him — now if they can get Artest for the dame money THEN I think Ariza is very portable and a team like Portland should pounce.
by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can get behind Turkoglu if...
If he’s not a 5 year, 10 million dollar contract.
If he can play at least average defense.
If he brings other things to the floor besides mediocre shooting.
If he’s okay being the third or fourth option.
If he doesn’t take minutes away from Rudy, of whom I think is a greater asset.
If he realizes that he needs to not take possessions off.
If we have someone else lined up in exchange for Outlaw.
All of these things could very well be true. But that’s a lot of ifs.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 12:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
that's a good list to start with
I think a lot of people are way overvaluing Hedo’s playmaking skills. Why do we need a PG, Roy and Hedo to make plays?
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jul 2, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
one thing's for sure...
we absolutely need a second playmaker. Whether it’s Hedo or a new point guard, we have to get that.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
good point
it would be a shame if we are getting Hedo just for that.
6 games against Houston and suddenly we need Hedo to balance our offense. The rest of the year we need more defense to balance out our top rated offense. I think it’s the “let’s get Shaq to stop a big center” theme for the Suns and Cavs. Building a team to beat one opponent is silly.
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jul 2, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
I’d argue we need a second creator 82 games a year, and come playoff time we need it no matter who we are playing.
I won’t disagree with you one iota about the defensive needs though
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We would have lost to LA and Denver as well, and struggled to score.
We just didn’t have the personnel to handle playoff basketball
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all about the playoffs right now. After watching the postseason it became evident to
me that Houston, Denver, and LA were clearly superior teams.
Spurs have now added a key piece and if we stand pat, we’re going to be the #5 team in the West in my opinion and get bounced in the first round again.
We can either sit with our current roster and cross our fingers that Oden becomes Dwight Howard, and Batum becomes Scottie Pippen, and Rudy becomes Ginobli and wait out the Lakers to get old.. or we can add another playmaker which puts us on par with Denver, Houston, and San Antonio while also retaining our young players. And if one of them becomes a star then we’re the best team in the West
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What then?
What happens then, after you add a player who is peaking now, and the rest of your time isn’t?
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All it takes is Oden getting his stuff together and we can win next year.
Roy, Turkoglu, LA, and a much improved Oden makes us a contender next season.
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really all we need is development for any 2 of our young guys.
We would be much improved if any or all of these guys take a significant step in development.
Jerryd*
Martell
Rudy*
Nic*
Greg*
Not to mention 4/5 of them are going to be second year players, and trends show quite a marginal jump from year one to year two.
There is some serious room for growth here.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess it comes down to a "win now" versus "win when our window opens"
Of course, we wont have our cap space when our window opens. I guess that adds another if to my statement. “If he doesn’t scuttle our hopes down the road.”
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bingo
Which is why I think the smartest move is to wait. Hedo’s great, but it could potentially be too much too early and stall the development of the Blazers.
Sorry, I guess I’m just too much of a believer that every time the Blazers go for the “sure thing” they get let down. Sam Bowie is coming back to haunt us! :-P
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think this stunts the development of anyone other than Nic.
Rudy should get 30 minutes if Nate knows what he’s doing. Oden will surely benefit from having another playmaker/distributor out there.
I just don’t see how this move hurts our ability to win titles 3-4 years from now.
Meanwhile, it gives us a chance starting next year to possibly win a title if Oden steps up. And if not, we at least have a shot to make a run to the WCF and gain invaluable experience for our core
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I meant was...
Not stunting the individual growth of players, but more, Hedo is ready to contribute now, and I don’t think the Blazers as a whole are prepared to do so. I still see them as 2 years out, another one at best.
While Hedo may make up a great starting 5, the bench will ultimately need to be stronger to go deep into the playoffs.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Turk could help the kids get "there" sooner
By showing them how improve their interior passing, and increasing Greg’s confidence one dunk at a time
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get to another team you mean.
Remember, Hedo will be taking their development minutes and smothering their potential.
There is nothing wrong with Batum’s interior passing.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turk will win you over
But if you want to jump off the bandwagon and root for another team, no one’s stopping you
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it should be
“learn to win now” not “win now”
What other FA has been to the finals and can bring that knowledge to the Blazers that KP believes is a fit for the culture?
This move may be nothing other than taking a calculated risk that Hedo is enough to get us a slightly better during the season (+2 or 3 games) for a 2/3 1st round seed and get into the 2nd round for the next 2 years.
Then, an annual push for the WCF/Finals while the big 3 are in their primes.
by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't really care about these moves. Hedo will help the team so great, bring him in.
The Blazers title hopes all revolve around whether the Big 3 ever becomes the Big 3. It’s the Big 2 right now. If Oden ever becomes good enough to make it the Big 3, then we’ll win titles.
Guys like Rudy, Batum, Martell, and Hedo are all just pieces to surround the Big 3.
The Blazers title hopes still revolve around Greg Oden. If he becomes the player we thought he was when drafted #1, we will win titles. If he doesn’t, then I dont think there is a player available in trade or FA that will get us a championship.
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm.. Gortat as a backup four would duplicate what Birdman could potentially bring. He was in the finals, and held his own.
Without messing up the minute crunch we are all trying to figure out. Then again Hedo’s impact would be X10 that of Gortat.
I would worry about Gortat playing with Pryz though. Not much scoring punch in that combo, then again if we surrounded those two with a pass-first wing and two knockdown shooters I could see it working well.
But Hedo is still a much higher impact then Gortat.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turkoglu to europe?
I think Josh Childress is currently the highest paid European basketball player at a little under $20 mil for three years (13.5 mil euros multiplied by a 1-1.41 rate conversion currently). If Hedo could command only a 7 million a year euro contract a year for 5 years that would equal the $50 mil/5 year contract that Hedo’s agent has been reportedly asking for here. Also, I’m not up on my millionaire tax skills so maybe someone else can post a response with a figure, but what would the tax on a Turkoglu $50 mil/5 year deal be in lets say Portland or Toronto? That can’t be nice number for Hedo.
…This reason is impossible to know without knowing Turkoglu well as a person, so I will come at this with the perspective of a first time father of a one year old (only slightly older than Turkoglu’s daughter). Is it possible that Turkoglu would go play in Europe simply because he wanted to raise his daughter over there instead of here?
To sum it up, if Hedo is offered more money in Europe than the cash strapped/salary cap prevented teams can in the NBA with less games can he pass that up?
by RoyalAsn on Jul 2, 2009 12:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You hit the financial nail on the head
The Raptors have to offer Hedo more because he will see less there.
This is loosely based. I’m not sure about the rules for a foreign working visa for Canada and how that effects taxable income rates, but assuming for the sake of argument that he will be taxed like a Canadian resident, he would pay approx 43% in taxes.
That is based on a 10mil/yr figure. That means his actual keep at the end of the year is something like 5.5mil.
Also, Toronto has 15% sales tax, which is double what it is in most states here. Not meaning to start a Canada vs. United States economical debate, but Hedo gets more money here.
How MUCH more though, depends on how the governments handle US players playing there, with taxes and such.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Here's how you get the figures
For just a really basic sense of taxes in CA, use this: http://lsminsurance.ca/calculators/canada/income-tax
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW
There are variations of rules and tax structures that athletes set up to hopefully offset some of the taxes.
That is why it’s ironic that they claim to be for taxes, democratic and in support of various politicians, because most of them hire financial advisers who handle it all and they don’t even have a clue what they are doing.
You can avoid taxes by setting up a domestic or foreign trust in Canada for example, and slash your tax rate in almost half. Also you can split your income with your spouse if you’re married, and you can do various structuring with income and lines of credit to reduce your taxes by putting them in various retirement plans and investment securities.
There are ways around it that are relatively commonplace among the upper-class and if you can afford to hire a consultant to do it for you, then most of them never even have a clue where their money is going and what it’s doing while it’s not in their bank accounts.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect he'll keep his residence in Orlando
Florida has no income tax, so most of the multi-millionaire athletes “live” there (Tiger, Griffey, etc)
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff but remember each state also taxes based upon games played in state
So Canadian tax might apply to 41+ games each year and the rest are state/US taxed. US taxes (and most states are in sync with US Federal) apply to total income for citizen and provide a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes. For Turk and other non-citizen/non-residents living in Canada and playing games in US only the US sourced income may be taxable in US.
by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Note about European Contracts
They monies quoted in Euroleague and similar contracts are different than the NBA, because the NBA salaries are gross. In Europe, the figure given is NET, so in reality, the Europeans make a lot more than we realize.
As of 2007, here were the top salaries. I can’t find info for 2009.
1. Sarunas Jasikevicius (Panathinaikos) 4.2mio
2. Theodoros Papaloukas (CSKA) 3.5mio
3. Ramunas Siskauskas (CSKA) 2.5mio
4. Arvydas Macijauskas (Olympiakos) 2.2mio
5. Lazaros Papadopoulos (Real) 2.0mio
6. Alexei Savrasenko (CSKA) 2.0mio
7. Dimitris Diamantidis (Panathinaikos) 1.9mio
8. J.R. Holden (CSKA) 1.85mio
9. David Anderson (CSKA) 1.8mio
10. Nikola Vujcic (Maccabi Tel Aviv) 1.7mio
For reference, 3mil euros is about 7 mil US, factoring in taxes. All of these are PER YEAR.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For what it's worth...
This is what KD from Ball Don’t Lie had to say about Hinrich being traded…
[Comment From RB]
What are the odds that the Bulls still try and trade Hinrich now that Gordon is gone?
KDonhoops: Very good odds. They’ve got three starters on rookie contracts, due to extend.
Hope is still alive…
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 12:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I see Cabby already posted this.
This was my comment though (note RB and Arby ;-) ), just thought I’d share.
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just asked Hollinger a similar question but I’m late to the chat, probably won’t make it in.
"I take the little gummy bear Flintstones vitamins…I try not to eat the lady. I try not to eat the man. Just give me the car. I try to find the car. Yea, worst case scenario, I eat the lady." - Ron Artest, 2009
by rivetz on Jul 2, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
meh
I won’t complain if we get Hinrich, so long as the price is only Blake/Outlaw (or less), but I’m not sitting here salivating over the prospect. If we get Hinrich, it tells me we couldn’t reasonably obtain the PG(s) we really wanted.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t think anyone better is reasonably available. Harris ain’t movin’.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I REALLY hope that's not the case.
But I fear that it is. If so, then I hope it would be a relatively inexpensive deal. Otherwise, we may as well just stay with Blake and Bayless for this season.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In that Drexler interview,
I like how Clyde thinks that the NBA only wants big market teams in the finals, or their biggest stars.
by JoeBlazer on Jul 2, 2009 12:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
In other news...
Water is wet.
Just kidding. :)
I’m sure the NBA would love a Lakers-Brooklyn series if LeBron goes there in 2010. But at the same time, they wouldn’t dare do anything to try and directly facilitate that. Nothing destroys a league faster than tampering by the league itself.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been saying that for years
but Clyde actually had to stare down Jake O’Donnell, while the refs were ripping championships right out of Portland’s hands
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ben you spelled watch wrong
Oden...Aldridge...Roy.....THE REAL BIG THREE
by CroRupt on Jul 2, 2009 1:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Only if the FANS had the power....Look at the Poll KP
I voted with the majority and this makes me think of the futbol club Barcelona. The newly crowned kings of european futbol have an interesting way of working with the fans. The team is partially managed by the fan base. They have a say in who they pursue and who manages their team.
Here’s a link: http://www.fcbarcelona.com/web/english/socis/avantatges/veu_i_vot.html
I like the idea and I would exercise my power to veto this TURK deal.
by NDREXLERDRIVE on Jul 2, 2009 1:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If that ever happens.....
…..this team is doomed.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
barcelona just one the most coveted trophy in club soccer
by NDREXLERDRIVE on Jul 2, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They also have many MILLIONS of dollars
in a sport without a salary cap and can get whatever players they want. Different system.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
your right on that
cool way of involving your fans though
by NDREXLERDRIVE on Jul 2, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still not sure I want Turkoglu at all.
But you’re still absolutely right.
+1
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously.
I get that fan in put is important – without us, there IS no NBA.
but still – come on people – we all spend 40-80 hrs/week at our jobs and these guys have been spending 80-100hrs/week in basketball for decades. I’d like to think that they know a bit more than we do.
I am not saying “Faith in KP” – just noting that to let the actual fans decide who stays/goes is ludicrous.
by pdxrob on Jul 2, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For what?
Who would want to trade for Hedo with a 4 yr contract at about 40 mil remaining?
That’s also risky because you’re then betting on him performing great, and boosting his value. It’s obvious he’s over-valued now because of the lack of bigger free agents.
If he was in a stronger pool, I doubt we’d even hear his name mentioned with 50 million.
by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only reason I say that is ...
I don’t particularly want him on the team, but it would be a way of preserving some cap value from now to next year, when we won’t have any. To get a free agent next year, sign Turkoglu now, then do sign-and-trade with somebody next year, when players are moving around like crazy. Just a thought.
by Kaboomm on Jul 2, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he was in a stronger pool, I doubt we’d even hear his name mentioned with 50 million
This is true, but like winning the lottery and getting Oden at #1, franchises can’t always pick the year they have cap-space, sometimes “the year picks you”
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In other words,
maybe we could benefit just by signing Hedo now, giving us an asset that’s useable next year. Otherwise, we get little or no extra asset with this year’s cap space. I’m talking myself into the Hedo thing, although I still don’t love it.
by Kaboomm on Jul 2, 2009 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Batum's reaction to a Hedo 5-YEAR contract?
Batum may not be ready next year for a 36 minute pace BUT
5 years of waiting to start again?
If Rudy was upset that the seat in the “musical-chair-game” was given away for 5 years,
what do you think is playing out in Batum’s mind?
I’m sure that a week ago… neither KP or Nate had mentioned to Batum that his chance to
start again was to be moved out 5 years.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We are guilty of loving our players, particularly our young guys a little too much.
We all love Nic’s game and personality, but I trust that our managment group know what they have on their current roster and what needs to be added Batum should be able to play 20 minutes a game for the next few years, and is still a baby.
To me, Batum is really the only reason I would question this move. It certainly does hurt his development, but if Pritchard is so in love with Turkoglu and what he brings to the table, Im going to trust him
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If KP is publically implying
that Rudy was happy a week ago and he doesn’t understand a “new-found” issue?
I think “management” is hoping for minimal damage to the chemistry.
They’re wrong. It’s potentially bigger than that.
Blazer’s Euro connection was only slightly damaged by not developing Sergio and his giveaway.
But what happens if Hedo gets a 5 year contract to the attitude of the other players like
Rudy who gave up bigger $$$s to come to the Blazers (like Claver, Freeland, Koponen, etc).
Will they just not take a chance but stay home where the $$$ are?
Will that source of talent bypass Portland?
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Euro connection is destroyed because Rudy can't deal with playing 30 minutes a game as the sixth man
for a championship contender, then so be it.
With Turkoglu in the fold we don’t need a traditional PG. Therefore, there is no reason Rudy, Roy, Turkoglu, LA, Oden can’t all be on the floor together for major minutes
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And your fine with losing the other Euro players, too?
Batum – have to wait 5 years for a starting spot.
Claver (also Spanish), Freeman, and Koponen – who needs a couple years develop before we want them.
Other Euros who will be offered bigger $$$ to stay near home.
If you really thought it through, I don’t think you would be so …..
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, if Euro's dont want to come here because Rudy can't live with being a sixth man
then I dont want them here. THat’s ridiculous.
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we sign Hedo, and Batum stays...
It is 2.5 years coming off the bench. Barring a starworthy effort by Hedo i doubt he is going to start all five years of his contract with Batum nipping at his heels.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hedo plays all the wing positions (2,3,4)
There’s no reason Batum can’t play alongside Turk. Nic has to “beat out” Martell and Rudy for more PT. (The fact that he’s the only above-average wing defender on the roster will help set him apart. Nate will play him for that reason, alone)
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll love a Batum, Roy, Hedo, LMA, Oden lineup
Shortest guy would be Roy at 6’5. Batum can guard PGs. Great size and length on defense.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Roy is 6’5.5’’ without shoes, isn’t he? I think he’s at least a legit 6’6’’’ with them.
That would be a fun lineup. Hedo and Roy as co-point guards…. that lineup would work wonders against Denver or some such team.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
bet we'd see that lineup a lot
good D. good ballhandlers.
by DimeTime on Jul 2, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
KP has a choice here => Hedo or Hedon't
I prefer Hedon’t
by mmm! on Jul 2, 2009 1:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel bad for Casey. He´s meeting Batum now.
Batum: what the heck happens with my playing time then? $%·"&(!!!!!!
Casey: I don´t understand French.
Batum: I´m speaking English!
Casey: what´s English? I´m confused. I like France. Talk to me about those beautiful chateaux so I can post something at trailblazers.com
by amlmart1 on Jul 2, 2009 2:10 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Why was Casey given a free tour ticket to Europe at this time?
Now we know……. to assess and sop the damage.
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you for not linking to the canzano article.
http://following-thetrail.blogspot.com
by BigCelPhone on Jul 2, 2009 2:20 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Team is young; Coach is young; GM is young
We’ve made a splash. Now is the difficult phase of converting that success and confidence to maturity.
For KPs part, I think that means surrendering his vision of the team to Nate’s. Or get a new coach.
For Nate’s part, that means learning to trust and respect his players. In other words, quit it with the high school “tryout” vibe and get behind his players.
These are the reasons Rudy finds himself in this situation.
What we are seeing with Rudy
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 2:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
By my fuzzy math...
The recent poll numbers suggest 80% of respondents don’t want Hedo. Now I know KP should never listen to the fan base to make decisions, for those who make decisions with the fans are bound to sit with them. But honestly, there will be a few boos for Turkoglu on opening night when he’s introduced, ESPECIALLY if it comes at the cost of Rudy Fernandez and the development of Martell and Nic. I think we all see what an awful move this is.
I agree with you Blazin’- This looks to me like KP surrendering to Nate’s desire to add a veteran, no matter the fit or position. This whole thing has rubbed me the wrong way and it’s honestly making me very sad to see such a bright future robbed.
by sPresley on Jul 2, 2009 3:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And...
When the team is winning games and going deep into the playoffs, the 80% that disproved of the signing will look like fools.
Remember, there were a lot of fans that wanted the Stache over Roy.
by lrh86 on Jul 2, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said.
I’d hope that no matter what happens, even if +Hedo means -Rudy, that we give Hedo the benefit of the doubt and cheer him like we would any new Blazer. If his play supports his contract, everybody wins.
by pdxrob on Jul 2, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has to.
Or get a new coach.
Nate and Brandon are aligned. Their styles compliment each other. And that’s what we have to work with.
I think Turkoglu will help with the mensch-hood. Which is a pretty big deal.
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The WINNING solution!
Ok, here’s what Portland should do. Trade Outlaw to the Bulls staright up for Hinrich and sign Ariza for $40 mil instead of Hedo for $50…Ariza is a stud in the making w/superior defensive skills tren Hedo. The Lakers will be weakened by this, thus putting us in the FINALS! My $.02 !
by DaddyLos on Jul 2, 2009 3:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ariza adds nothing
If Webster comes back healthy, I’d argue Webster is actually better than Ariza. And he sure isn’t worth $40 million. I’m on board with your Hinrich trade though.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's just sign hedo.... trade him to the raptors on the 9th and be done with it....
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
"New Man Law: If you don't show up for the draft you don't get to come later if you're picked. If you believe in yourself, show up and sit there. If nobody else believes in you, take it and cry like a man...in front of the cameras."
-Dave
by faith on Jul 2, 2009 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, how many times do we have to say this?
You can’t trade a newly signed free agent until December 15th.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just read somewhere
that if the free agent agrees and is aware, they can be used in a sign and trade…sorry i dont have the link
"Grayg"
-Nate
by OSUBlazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that only worked
If said free agent played for the signing team at the end of the previous year.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You read that from Mike Barrett
who has no idea what he’s talking about.
Keep in mind that everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazers Edge.
by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its hard to gauge how much this really bugs rudy
but it obvious that its going to pinch minutes bigtime and how long will rudy put up with it? Is it worth signing a 30 year old guy if it forces us to deal a young possible star in the making in the next 2 seasons?? I just dont know how i feel about all this.
- Neil
by Blazin'aTrail on Jul 2, 2009 3:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Why is it assumed Rudy loses minutes?
The way I see it, the guys who will lose minutes are the PG (whoever it is), and guys like Batum and Martell.
Rudy will play with Roy and Turkoglu a ton.
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couple of things off my chest
I understand people have concerns about Hedo signed to a long term contract. Let’s keep it real. Five years is too long for a 30 year old. There are not many 35 year old players playing in the NBA. My dream scenario would be a 3 year contract with a 4th year team option between $35-$40 million. The team option is not going to happen, so the next best deal would be 4 years between $35-$40 million since Hedo already turned down a 4 year $35 million extension from the Magic.
Hedo, or any free agent signing this summer, will not make the Blazers sudden championship contenders. The core is Oden, LMA, and Roy. Those guys are gonna be paid more than Hedo in the long run. Ultimately it is up to the core of Oden, LMA, and Roy to step offensively, but more importantly, defensively. What Hedo brings to the table that no other free agent brings is his unique skill set that complements all three core players. Hedo can play the pick and roll/pop with Oden and LMA. He can be the primary offensive initiator instead of Blake, Outlaw, or Sergio when the ball is out of Roy’s hands. That is a giant upgrade in my eyes. Hedo will also be a defensive upgrade over Outlaw who played the most minutes at SF.
Taking a step back and looking at the Blazers future, Hedo’s salary will not make a difference in the long run. LMA and Roy will sign big extensions this summer. Oden will get a big payday next year. There’s not going to be any room to add another significant free agent for a good few years. Since Hedo’s playing style is not based on superior speed or athleticism, I think he’ll be very productive for at least another 3 years. By the time his contract is up, LMA and Roy’s first extension will most likely be up as well. That’s the timing KP should be aiming for to get back serious roster flexibility.
Hedo may not be the defensive stopper, but he is a competent defender with his height and length. When I watch him play, I don’t ever think that the other team is exploiting him. The Blazers biggest problem last year was team defense. Learning how to defend the pick and roll, getting back in transition, helping on penetration, and rotating to perimeter shooters. Ariza or Hinrich will not automatically solve our issues. Again, it is up to the core of Oden, LMA, and Roy to lead. Oden has to become the dominate defensive presence. LMA must be a better help defender. Roy needs to improve his focus and awareness. Would I like to see an upgrade at PG? Definitely. Blake just isn’t quick or strong enough to be relied upon. The other guys I mentioned, including Hedo, have the physical tools to be part of a great defensive team. A guy like Blake sticks out because most teams have a primary playmaker at the PG position.
I’m hoping KP will sign Hedo and find a better defensive PG than Blake. What I’m trying to say is that the core of Oden, LMA, and Roy will determine the future of the Blazers. Signing Hedo right now helps the development of all three players. That is something I can get behind, even if he gets overpaid.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 3:38 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
+1 well said sir.
Hedo is the best option on the market.
by rydog9991 on Jul 2, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had not thought of it that way.
Good reasoning.
So if your scenario pans out, what would blzrfan the GM offer as a max K?
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm willing to sign Hedo for 3 years $30 million.
He’s gonna get at least 4 years and $35 million. The 4th year should be ok since the Blazers won’t have cap space anyways. If he gets a 5th year, I’ll be little irritated.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very fair offer to Hedo.
30 and 3 is a nice starting point.
* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...
by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 2:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For me, it comes down to three things to be okay with a Hedo signing.
How long is the contract? I’d be okay with four years. Five years scares me.
Is our chemistry intact? I want Rudy to be happy.
Did we go get an upgrade at the point with Outlaw? If we’re signing Hedo, it means we want to contend – now.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
I want no more than 4 years. The way I look at it, Rudy’s happiness is secondary to the development of Oden, LMA, and Roy. If he’s unhappy, we’ll trade him and find another guy who can shoot the ball. Outlaw is definitely gone if Hedo signs. I’m hoping we use him as a trading chip for a defensive PG.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fans at blogabull are pining for a Blake/Outlaw for Hinrich deal to clear space for the magical 2010. I would live with Hinrich/Hedo, though it’s not a home run.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, at least it would be something
We’d be a better team next year than last year under that scenario and it signals a desire to win now, which I like. Whether it would look like a good offseason in 2-3 years is debatable. Giving Turk a long contract seems like a recipe for disaster to me though.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
is it really though? In two years we could give him a more marginal role coming off the bench, like we did with Delef or Augmon back in the early part of the decade.
I still don’t really like the Hedo signing. Hinrich would just make it reasonable.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a homerun to me.
Get a great defensive PG who can shoot and play off the ball. Sign a SF who runs a great pick and roll.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
pretty much just stick Kirk in the corner for most of the game, let Hedo and Roy take turns initiating the offense.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That only bad part of that lineup is fast breaks
Bayless could be the answer if he improves.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a pace factor of 80, here we come!
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I might be in the minority, but I felt Bayless and Batum both did as good a job as any Blazer running the break last year. Bayless actually understood spacing somewhat and was such a threat to the rim that the break was somewhat effective.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Batum was very good on runouts
Bayless, Rudy and Batum could conceivably form a good fast breaking 2nd unit.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you guys are on the money with this one
but can one of you explain to me how it is that NBA level players have not yet been taught spacing/how to run a fast break?
Is it that hard for Nate to teach these guys?
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno. it’s definitely frustrating.
I think a lot of it is because these guys are more athletic than their competition and have been at every level. They are used to outrunning and outleaping.
Also, most teams that run a good break have a veteran point guard.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
to me it's a coaching issue
your theory makes sense. thanks.
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not a bad second unit
Contingent on Bayless not playing like a scrub. Hedo could help the second unit too with playmaking for short spurts. He was the main guy when Howard was out of the game.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Bayless can really help this team if he consistently plays like he did in that stretch when Blake was out. If he plays like a scrub the way he did most of the year, backup PG is a major hole.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
with the way he’s training, he should be able to play at least as well as he did when given regular time last year.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It does make some difference
bad contracts are harder to move, but with respect to the capspace you’re right.
by Falcao on Jul 2, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry blzrfan
Have to disagree with your statement “he’ll be very productive for at least another 3 years”. What makes you think that he will be more productive than he was last season? And last season he was only an average producer – if you take any advanced stat into consideration. So far WP48 has shown strong correlation between a players production and team wins and Hedo has a WP48 of 0.101 (where 0.1 is average), so if we assume his production to remain similar to last year, then he will still be average.
That being said, whether the team improves with Hedo depends on whose minutes he takes. If he takes Travis’s minutes, then surely the team will improve because Travis has a miserable WP48 of 0.043. If on the other hand he takes Rudy’s minutes (WP48 of 0.129) then team wins will suffer. So in the end it all comes down to whose minutes he takes.
BTW, the best producers on the Blazers last year were: Roy, Przybilla, Blake, Fernandez and Oden.
by mmm! on Jul 2, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sold on WP.. It overvalues defensive rebounds.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
its a useful metric, but can't measure D (like all the other advanced metrics)
There are also enough cases where it differs so sharply from other metrics (like Win Shares, PER, Adjusted Plus Minus, Statistical Plus Minus, Offensive rating, etc) that it really shouldn’t be relied on by itself. Of course, that’s true of the other advanced metrics also.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
End game lineup
Roy Rudy Hedo Aldridge Oden
I’m ok with that.
Options on offense are inredible.
On Defense, this team will have to learn to play good Team D.
Good luck defending that starting lineup. It is the right choice. Even at 5 year 50 mil. We are going to be handicapped in FA with the long term lockups of Roy, Aldridge, and eventually Oden. This is the one opportunity to grab a key piece in FA.
Make it happen KP. In KP I trust. Don’t listen to the bandwagon haters. They jump off as fast as they jump on. Stay the course. Make the decisions based on your intuition and what makes sense. Not what someone puts on a blog.
Rudy/Roy/Hedo/Aldridge/Oden
Out.
by JimmieG on Jul 2, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
End of the 4th, game tied with 6 seconds left..
Nobody is being double-teamed with that lineup because the play could be drawn up for ANY of them
by 2005TelfairJerseyForSale on Jul 2, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is everyone here
so against getting Hedo? I was shocked when I saw the poll results.
Oden+Roy+Aldridge+Rudy+Bayless=Dynasty. Believe
by OdenRoyLMA on Jul 2, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
30 years old, below average PER, mediocre defender, needs the ball in his hands to be effective
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a better defender than he gets credit for.
And he doesn’t NEED to have the ball to be effective, but that’s when he’s at his best for sure. I’d be happy if he just was another outside shooting option.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hedo is not nearly a good enough shooter to be "another outside shooting option," especially at his price
I’d agree he’s a better defender than he gets credit for though, but that’s not saying too much. He’s an average defender.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like the price tag on Hedo.
I’d say he’s a 5.5 out of ten on defense, though. And it’s not like his coming on the team would make it worse. I don’t buy any of the “Rudy is furious” talk.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention he's a near 40% career 3 point shooter.
Doesn’t matter what league you’re in, that’s pretty good.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he makes us worse. If he takes Outlaw's minutes (like mmm! noted), he maes us better
Its 2-3 years down the road where he scares me.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By then, Batum should be FAR improved.
Batum should be the starting SF by then and if his development goes well, he should be an excellent option. If he’s not great by his 4th or 5th year, that’s too bad. But that won’t bring the team down.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you know
Batum shot 37% from three in his rookie season…
by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
they were all WIDE OPEN threes, though. he was a decent shooter, not better than Martell, Travis, Brandon, Rudy, and Steve.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m thinking that he’s actually a really good open three point shooter. Van Gundy’s system had so many contested threes…… it’s just my theory on one of the reasons that KP likes him.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, we don't need another 3
And we want to see Batum reach his potential.
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because..
1) They overvalue our young Euros
2)Crazy dreams of Gerald Wallace, Tay Prince, Devin Harris
I really don’t get it. Hedo makes this team alot better and does nothing to jeopordize our core of Roy, LA, Oden.
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the blazers arent beating the lakers anytime soon
Artest to the lakers
"Grayg"
-Nate
by OSUBlazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I believe the word I want to say isn't allowed on this site
So I will just have to go with “fiddlesticks!”
This makes signing Hedo all the more important to keep up with the Lakers, because otherwise Artest blankets Roy and our offense becomes stagnant.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So then what do we do with Batum?
Make San Antonio’s best dreams come true and give Batum to them?
The cake will be ready when the dinger goes off. Everyone needs to chill.
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh yes they are. Artest is a lamewad
and the beavers will be beating the stuffing out of the dux for years to come. go beavs!!
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.
Even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked.
by Love on Jul 2, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
going forward, I would honestly rather have Ariza
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For one year, i would rather have artest
there is no doubt in my mind that the *akers win back-to-back
"Grayg"
-Nate
by OSUBlazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Lakers are certainly favorites but I would take Ariza even just for next year.
Ariza is very nearly as good on D and won’t shoot a team out of a game the way Artest sometimes does.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
the fact that Artest is a year older and was already showing signs of slowing down. Roy got past him pretty easily in the playoffs. It was Battier playing ball-deny defense that Roy had the hardest time against.
Truthfully, Artest out of his FA year, a year older vs. Ariza on the upside of his career, I agree with jksnake that I would think Ariza would be a better fit for the Lakers next year.
Not saying that the PTB will surpass the Lakers next year, just that the idea that the move to get Artest makes them unreachable is wrong.
by portlandpete on Jul 2, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
with Ariza meeting with the Rockets.
So those two would be essentially traded. Doesn’t affect us that much.
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Artest>>> Ariza for 09-10
"Grayg"
-Nate
by OSUBlazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's probably true
But I still think it’s the year after where we need to start worrying about how we match up with the top few teams in the league.
And Artest has that whole ticking time bomb thing going on. Though Jackson is probably the best coach in dealing with that kinda thing.
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Jackson could handle Rodman
He can handle Artest.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
unless Ron-Ron
drives Phil into early retirement
(there’s something to root for)
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
all this Hedo talk
Is making me change my anti-Hinrich stance.
Hedo would:
1. Use up all of our cap space.
2. Banish Batum to the non-developmental-bench.
I hate both of those things. The Hinrich talk is suddenly looking like a great option. Hinrich! Hinrich! Hinrich! Rah! Rah! Rah!
Seriously, who has even speculated over the last several months that what the Blazers really need is a fourth 3?!
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 3:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
unless you do both...
getting Hedo allows you to trade Outlaw and Blake for Heinrich-Batum can still get minutes off the bench this way-bring him along without forcing him to start
by Waltonia on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who has even speculated over the last several months that what the Blazers really need is a fourth 3
Actually, quite a few folks have been pining for a starting SF (not me, unless you count the Hinrich-deng proposals)
names like…
Gerald Wallace
Tayshaun Prince
Richard Jefferson
Shane Battier
have been mentioned. Not to mention Trevor Ariza
The thing about Turk is…he fills the starting SF position and adds the playmaking ability of a PG in one tidy contract and roster spot
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
1. It’s gone when Roy and Aldridge sign extensions this season anyway.
2. Batum is nice but he’s not exactly as good as Hedo Turkoglu is he?
by TheMadKiwi on Jul 2, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
30 + 5
Let’s say he turns back the clock next year and sustains his 17-point, five-rebound, five-assist averages. Coupled with poor defense, how does that help? How does 41 percent shooting help when Travis Outlaw – one of the league’s more underrated offensive talents – is taking fewer shots, and playing fewer minutes? How does the defense improve with Turkoglu taking Nicholas Batum’s minutes? And that’s just assuming Hedo’s contributions sustain. It could happen, but for someone his age, that’s hardly something to bank on.
link to: Does Portland know that Hedo Turkoglu is 30?
by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 4:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I just hate
The seeming inevitability of it all….I mean, based on everything that’s happened, it’s seems like the inescapable conclusion is that we will sign Hedo to a massive, long term contract, and throw yet another small forward into the already muddled rotation. A 10 player rotation wont work. We wont get to develop Batum to the required degree, and we still dont address the point guard issues…all while using up our cap space. I’ve liked this signing less and less as each day has gone by….and I dont wanna wake up tomorrow knowing that we’ll be saddled with this contract for 5 years….but I feel like that’s exactly what’s gonna happen.
by emc503 on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My project manager just saw Hedo at PDX
He was on the same Horizon flight from SeaTac to PDX that got in around 3. Said he was nice and took some pictures with a kid. My manager asked him if he wanted to be a blazer and he said “Yeah, I want to be a Blazer.”
by g-off on Jul 2, 2009 4:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the inside info!
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm telling you guys
Once we see him in action with our team everyone will love him.
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if you were Chris Sheridan
This quote would be on the front page of ESPN. Good scoop.
by sagcat on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, Sheridan would say
“Turkoglu gives verbal commitment to Blazers.”
by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Breaking News: "Turkoglu gone insane! Wants to be a Chevy."
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm against it.
But if he wants to be here, what the hell.
Let’s win this thing.
by Garces on Jul 2, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He landed in Hillsboro...my backyard seriously, private jet
"Grayg"
-Nate
by OSUBlazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Even though both John Canzano and Max Handelman are terrible, ill-informed writers, I'd rather be ...
in Handelman’s shoes. I thought about using a word other than “shoes,” but that’d’ve been a bit crass on my part.
All kidding aside, though, Handleman’s article was flat-out junk, particularly the fallacious line about how most folks are behind the potential Hedo Turkoglu signing. Seriously, the dude is out of touch.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
AK1984
Have you read the Seattle Times articles about the Sonics the last couple of days? I wanted to throw up.
"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith
by blzrfan on Jul 2, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Jerry Brewer did anger a lot of readers with that article about Oklahoma City.
For me, though, my vitriol is focused directly toward Howard Schultz. Y’know, NBA Commissioner David Stern, Clay Bennett, the Washington State Legislature, Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire, the Seattle City Council, and Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels all acted accordingly in such a situation.
On the other hand, former Basketball Club of Seattle, LLC Chairman Schultz sold out by selling the Seattle SuperSonics to an out-of-town ownership group like a cheap, self-centered jackass.
Looking back on it, 99% of the blame falls squarely on Schultz’s weak shoulders.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather be in Handleman's shoes
only because he has a hot actress wife.
by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that was the jist of my remark.
It’s also why I considered typing “I’d rather be in Handelman’s wife shoes,” but thought better of it.
Handelman, however, could justifiably mock me in retaliation for my shot at his ill-informed article, since I misspelled his surname as “Handleman” [sic] once in my original comment. I got it correct the other two times, though, so I guess that’s a positive.
by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simple question for the anti-Hedo group..
What do you think Batum becomes next year, the year after, and the year after, etc?
People act like Batum is destined for greatness. I like Batum alot, but people act like Batum playing 20 minutes a game in a bench role kills his development.
What did you guys envision for him next year and the year after? 40 minutes a games?
The kid still has a ton to work on
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 4:16 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I have no problem with Batum playing 20 mpg reserve role next year
My concern is that Hedo is an average player who is 30 years old and might be terrible in a couple years. That’s not the guy I want to use our capspace on. If we sign him to a reasonable contract (ie not 50 mil) and then clear up the SF logjam and get a better PG, I’ll learn to live with it.
by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Batum is a wing defender extrordinare
on a team that needs perimeter defense. His role will always be in demand
There’s no reason he can’t play alongside Hedo
(unless Martell and Rudy play better than Nic, that is…)
Competition for rotation minutes…embrace it
by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im on board. Rudy and Batum will see minutes if they improve their games. The PG position
is the one that become kinda irrelevant with Hedo in the fold.
He gives us the point forward that will allow for both Rudy and Roy to play together w/o having to hand the ball to Roy every possession
by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If defense didn't matter at all that'd be true
someone has to defend point guards.
by as11osu on Jul 3, 2009 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly!
We may be OK offensivly with Hedo so is even with Blake and his shooting accuracy. But what about D? We already have so-so defenders in our star players (Roy & LMA). We need to pair them with REALLY GOOD defenders to contend on the highest level.
Rudy & Nic
by k04a on Jul 3, 2009 1:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oregon Live Poll
An Oregon Live Poll on whether we should sign Hedo or not had some surprising results. Out of 3476 total votes when I looked, 1845 (53%) said yes, while 1631 (47%) said no. I was surprised because I was under the impression the larger group didnt want him.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/blazers/2009/07/poll-should-the-blazers-sign-hedo-turkoglu.html
I did a poll yesterday on Blazers Edge to see what people thought. OUt of 339 total votes, 104 (30%) for yes and 235 (69%) said no.
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/7/1/934519/the-end-all-hedo-vote
by cavejunctionblazer on Jul 2, 2009 4:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bedge folks are more into stats, which don’t like Hedo.
by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
10-1?
Sorry, but those “Beyond Bowie” guys in NYC are smoking some SERIOUS crack… I, too, would LOVE to see their sourcing…
Are you a Mexi-CAN or a Mexi-CAN'T?
by raggmopp on Jul 2, 2009 5:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
.jpg)


















