Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation MLB Twitter List

Thursday Hedo Watch

At some point I expect to spontaneously combust if I read more non-news on Hedo but given that this is the first big-name free agent the Blazers have chased in years I'll keep going wall-to-wall with the link coverage.  As noted in Prez's fanpost, feel free to drop links in these threads and I'll get them up ASAP.

------

This afternoon on his radio show Wheels At Work, Blazers Radio play by play announcer Brian Wheeler stated that if things continue to develop as they have been, the Blazers could potentially reach an agreement in principle with Hedo Turkoglu as early as tomorrow.

------

This afternoon on 1080 The Fan, Jason Quick said he believes there's a "96 % chance" Hedo will be a Blazer.

------

Clyde Drexler weighs in on Hedo on 95.5's MSP this morning.  Download the audio here...

Obviously, he's proven himself as a very good player... he's a seasoned veteran.... Do you have a position for him? Power Forward? Small Forward? Do you play him at Point Forward? You have to have an offense designed for his calibre of play.

The Blazers are obviously young, deep and talented and have the best team for the future in the entire league...

Adding a guy like Turkoglu can only improve the chemistry. But if you add Turkoglu, who do you take out of the mix?  You've got Fernandez, who I think is just as good.  I don't get it.

John Hollinger weighs in on Hedo-to-Portland during a live chat...

I like it .. not sure I love it. He's not really a $50 million player or anything close to it, but he's probably the best fit of the players available.

Why Hedo over Ariza?

Blazers desperately want another player who can create off the dribble so they're not so ridiculously dependent on Roy, something Houston exposed in last year's playoffs. So Hedo fits -- the Blazers can even use the "no PG" lineup like Orlando did and play Rudy-Turk-Roy in the backcourt. As for Ariza, my presumption has been that LA would match any offer for Ariza, and despite the comments put out there yesterday it's not clear to me that LA really isn't willing to go past midlevel for him -- now if they can get Artest for the same money THEN I think Ariza is very portable and a team like Portland should pounce.    

What is the biggest downside of bringing in Hedo?

The fact that he's 30 and might stink in two years. That's the downside potential.

Say the Blazers sign Turk. Who do they then trade out of Bayless, Mills, Blake, Rudy, Webster, and Outlaw... you can't have all those guys... can you?

I suspect Outlaw is the one that goes .. cap-friendly with just one year left at $4 mil, and his shot-creating ability won't be needed so much.

Doug Smith of the Toronto Star...

The Raptors seem to have pulled back on a decision to take a run at Orlando's Hedo Turkoglu, who now seems a good bet to land in Portland.

Still, two NBA sources said yesterday they thought Turkoglu was more interested in landing in Toronto than the Pacific Northwest. A report yesterday afternoon that Toronto was planning some exorbitant $60 million offer, however, was debunked by a handful of sources. It would take Toronto renouncing the rights to Shawn Marion, Anthony Parker, Carlos Delfino and others to get a Turkoglu deal done and one league source said a deal with Delfino was "close."

Ken Berger of CBS Sports...

The Toronto Raptors, for one, are deliberating what it would take to make Turkoglu an offer that would top the the five-year, $50 million proposal that Portland can offer, as reported early Wednesday by CBSSports.com. According to a person familiar with the situation, the Raptors are mulling whether they would be better off making a pre-emptive strike for Turkoglu -- which would entail renouncing the rights to Shawn Marion, Carlos Delfino, and Anthony Parker -- or trying to keep those players and sign a mid-level free agent. Toronto has yet to offer an extension to 2010 free agent Chris Bosh; that decision is tied to the others. And Turkoglu isn't the only free agent Toronto is considering. League sources indicated early Thursday that the Raptors also were contemplating an offer to restricted free agent David Lee.     

Dwight Jaynes with a look at the minute crunch...

If Turkoglu comes to Portland at upwards of $9 million per season, you can expect the team to use him at least 36 minutes a game. A small portion of that time could come at power forward, of course. But the other problem for Rudy is that the Blazers are going to want playing time for their backup small forward(s) - either a developing Batum, who simply cannot ride the pines with his defensive skills, or Martell Webster, who, if he's healthy is going to be a big help with his outside shooting. Or both.    

Dwight Jaynes sums up what makes for successful "recruiting"...

Forget the tours. Don't worry about the fancy dinner or the luxury items.

Be careful about bidding against yourself, but you better acknowledge right now what it's really all about. It's always about the money. Always....

Wendell Maxey looks at the market rate being set for NBA free agents...

Ben Gordon was busy laughing all the way to the bank.

Gordon verbally agreed to a five-year, $55 million deal with the Detroit Pistons on the first day of free-agency, and in doing so set the bar far too high for the other free-agents out there looking to get paid in full.

In other words, Ben Gordon done messed the game up.

Because that's the kind of deal Hedo is looking for. 

It appears that the Blazers do indeed have an issue on their hands when it comes to Rudy.

Check out this news of a Spanish Radio interview Rudy just gave... translated and summarized by our good friend in Spain amlmart1...

Acording to Marca Rudy talked to Efe Radio:

1º.- There´re always rumors and he knows about them from the press.

2º.- He hasn´t talked to his agents about him leaving the Blazers. He has only comented with them about the possibility of Turkoglu going to Portland.

3º.- He doesn´t close doors to any team from Europe or the NBA.

4º.- Asked about whether Torkoglu going to Portland might affect his playing time, he said: I want to play. We´ll have to talk with Portland and ask them how can I do it.

Also from amlmart1, here's a translated take on the same interview posted on ACB.com...

" Turkoglu is a Guard and we are speaking about almost six for two positions. This makes me think that the team does not give me space for my work. I have demonstrated that I could be more of a factor."

"I have been surprised with the minutes that I have played but if now they pick up a player in my position, that will stop my progression, and what I want is minutes so I can improve."

Nate Jones talks about Ariza in Portland (scroll down or click here for Dave's take)...

Turk is also on the wrong side of 30. I've never been a fan of giving long term deals to non-elite perimeter players over the age of 30. 

In contrast, Trevor Ariza does not need the ball in his hands to be effective. On offense he gets his points by slashing to the bucket, picking up garbage put-backs around the rim and hitting spot-up 3s. Also, he's an absolute defensive stud that would help the Blazers in their struggles of guarding some of the league's quicker PGs. He's also only 24 years old. 

On top of that, stealing Ariza away from the Lakers would weaken the Blazers' toughest conference foe.    

Raptor Blog has this analysis...

Hedo Turkoglu, 30 years old - The greatest Turkish player in NBA history is one of the hottest commodities on the free agent market. Strengths: Hedo is a savvy, gifted offensive player who can contribute both as a scorer and playmaker. Weaknesses: It's a testament to Dwight Howard's impact that the Magic were able to disguise what a mediocre defender he is. Also, he's incredibly overrated as a clutch shooter. 

The Dino Nation Blog has come out against Hedo...

According to many sources I am suppose to believe Bryan Colangelo is willing to pass out 50 to 60 million dollars toHedo? That is a hell of a lot of pizza money. Portland and the Raps said to be the front runners. This is one time I am cheering really hard for Raptors to lose. Because if you lose in the end you will really win. That sounds very Yogi Berra like did it not?    

Max Handelman of Beyond Bowie writes...

It's funny how conventional wisdom so quickly coalesces, and hardens into an almost impenetrable truth. Right now, in Blazerville, support for signing Hedo Turkoglu (to a reported 5-year, $50 million contract) is probably running at about 10-1.    

Where is that number coming from? Sean's Oregonlive poll today has it roughly 50/50. Our previous polls this week have been regularly Anti-Hedo.

John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water. 

-- Ben (benjamin.golliver@gmail.com)

Poll
Your preference?
Hedo for $50 million
583 votes
Ariza for $40 million
682 votes
Roll with Batum/Webster/Outlaw and see what happens
1343 votes

2608 votes | Poll has closed

1 recs  |  Comment 451 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The Pistons got robbed

Ben Gordon and Charlie V are Kwame Brown and AI v.2.0

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 9:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah...

I don’t think they like this very much in Detroit.

by jenstcy on Jul 2, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Charlie can be a very good player

He can score, rebound… I’d have had it instead of Turkoglu

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

him, sorry

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water. "

As is fitting for “journalist” of his “stature”.

by JordanLeDoux on Jul 2, 2009 9:17 AM PDT reply actions   4 recs

one rec for Jordan

> John Canzano had a piece about pizza and water.

One rec for Ben – Elgin

Without you out there, we're nowhere here

by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

No link for Canzano’s “sports article”

by Blazer Fan in Chicago on Jul 2, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Massive roster/chemistry shakeup for the Blazers

and he talks about how to properly prepare Hedo’s favorite pregame meal….which consists of something that a six year old with minimal working knowledge of a microwave could make?

Well played, sir. Glad the Oregonian is paying you to write those “hard hitting” “sports” “articles.” Maybe he could cover for the FoodDay writers if/when they get laid off.

by emc503 on Jul 2, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just going to close my eyes

and wait for this to be done. Turk is average. We have average at the SF position already. This makes no sense to me.

OLP is the best thing Canada has given the world outside of maple syrup

by SuperDave on Jul 2, 2009 9:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

good idea

I am really tired of wild “reports” of possible deals. Their main function seems to be to get attention rather than get real (excluding our Dave/Ben reality check team). “The 50 milloin Portland could offer”…. why stop there, Mr. Allen has more that that, he “could” offer a LOT more, pay any tax…. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. That could get some headline clicks. Give me a break. I remember someone saying, “once you hear about a deal, it is already dead”…. that would be nice in this case.
Turk doesn’t want to go NW, lets not force the guy against his will !!! Please, don’t do us any favors. Walking from the nice deal with a finals team, really ??? When is enough enough ? Yeah, doesn’t make sense to me either.

by Berkeley on Jul 2, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why the big push for Turk?

Many has said that we need to up grade to win the Championship. This is all based on their performance in the play-offs last year. IMO, we needed the play-offs to get that experience that everybody is talking about. I have heard many bloggers say that we just drew the wrong team for the first round. I think that Houston was a good team to go up against for the first time in almost a decade because the team found out how tough you had to be and how tough it is to go up against a team that has great players. The got some quality experience.

I don’t think anybody thought we were going to the finals last year, although, we came closer than some realized. Remember the two games we lost in Houston by what a total of 4 pts. Those games could vary well have been won. It was the lack of experience and choking up that made us lose. There is no way of proving it, but I would bet you the house I don’t own, if we were to play those games over with the same players after the experience we gained we would win those games.

Remember the plan was just to make the play-offs to get experience. Most of the fans didn’t think we were experienced enough to make the play-offs or if we did it would be eighth seed. We would get beat in the first round. Be honest, How many, including me thought we would be in the upper seeds, have home court advantage and tie for the championship with Denver?

Now, it seems like most fans want to trade these young men off because they are not good enough to win it all. Nobody knows that because nobody knows how good the same team will be next year. We dropped the players that wanted to go somewhere else to get more pt. or weren’t fitting in to what we needed. We replaced them with what I feel is pretty good off the bench type players.

 Why can’t we give these players another year, if for no other reason than to thank them for going to war for us and playing with the heart that we all should be proud of. The over achievement of this team was because of chemistry and the want to win.

It is common knowledge that we need team D. Not individual D. We were getting better and were almost respectable at the end of the year.

Now, you want to trade of players that didn’t play great D for players that don’t play any better D. You want to trade someone off that is a crunch time player for someone else that is a crunch time player. You want to trade someone off that is streaky at shooting for someone that is streaky at shooting, you want to trade off someone that will probably get better with age for someone that will probably get worst because age. You want to trade inexperience for experience for instant satisfaction of thinking we could win the championship with him next year. I would bet the house that somebody else might win in my first bet that even with Turk we won’t win it all next year. That is because of the lack of team D not individual D and we are not there yet.

With or with out Turk we are going to be a lot better next year because of growth and chemistry. We might win a few more games with Turk than without him, but that is no guarantee. If Martell stays healthy and Travis improves on D. we could probably be as good.

I am sorry about the rant and raving. I am not against Turk; I am not against Outlaw or Blake. I am just saying why mortgage the farm when he is not needed until after the following year when we will know more.

 Who knows we could very easily win it all with the guys we have. Besides all of that if you got rid of Blake and Travis, you would have to find someone else to hate. You hated JJ until you ran him off than you transferred your hate to Travis until you run him off then you will discover Turk can’t walk on water and isn’t that much better than Travis after-all and will start hating on him. Oh and I forgot Oden which isn’t the savior you were waiting for. Like the rest of the team give him a chance to grow.

hg

by BBK on Jul 2, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

REC

Well said hg… I think I’ve read your posts at O-live also and I respect your opinion.

by Ilikeemall on Jul 2, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You hated JJ until you ran him off

I think you have an over-inflated view of how fan reaction (especially on an internet blog!) influences front office decision-making

Jack was traded (not “run off”) to improve the ballclub. Not because Blazersedge thought he should be, but because Blazer management thought it was the best course of action

The only way fans can affect the front office is by buying seaosn tickets and making their voice heard at a round table meeting. Then, if they still aren’t satisfied they can choose not renew their seat (or suite) licenses. If enough fans choose to do this, then “changes” will be made (for example, back in 2003-2004)

Otherwise, what we think about players, coaches, GMs and Mr. Allen is irrelevant

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you, Bonzi.

“We’re not really going to worry about what the hell [the fans] think about us,” Wells says. “They really don’t matter to us. They can boo us every day, but they’re still going to ask for our autographs if they see us on the street. That’s why they’re fans and we’re NBA players.”

by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Blazers will send you a nice email in response

If you write them and complain about spending $$$ on Hedo (etc)

But then they’ll turn around and do whatever they want to do, anyway

(and why shouldn’t they?)

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I second your analysis ! ! !

Our year of experience is worth more than any of the free agents left availabie.

Though I wouldn’t mind an upgrade at pg or a bruiser down low, I would also be happy standing pat.

Kenny Rogers puts it best: “You’ve got to know when to hold ’em.” This is that time.

Stand pat, Blazers, and dance with them that brung ya.

by Jackalope 66 on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we did get Hedo to play the role of Travis off the bench and Hinrich replacing Blake, that would make us a better team.. I wonder if that’s KP’s plan.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It looks like Portland is really trying to get Hedo Turkoglu.

Odds of it being a smoke screen are pretty low. I hope they don’t over pay him if they think he’s a fit for this team. Or better yet, bid so low, that Turkoglu turns us down. I’ll find a way to live with him if he does sign, but I’m still not thrilled about the idea.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m really starting to wonder if KP already has a deal in place for Travis, as I’ve come to the same conclusion you have. This is very unlikely to be a smokescreen.

if we got Hinrich and Turkoglu, that would be acceptable.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

I’m thinking that if we don’t have a follow up deal in place, we at least have several “irons in the fire”. Obviously, if we sign Hedo, Travis will never wear a Blazer uniform again. The only question is who gets shipped out with him, and who comes back

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hinrich and the Turk would work from an X ’n O perspective……

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn’t say that. I’d rather we not sign Hedo.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duly noted.

I’ll rephrase – you dearly are hoping for the Hinrich maneuver.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know you like me and all ....

…. but hell no. That’s just not going to happen.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

out, demon!

Lessen your hold and come out of him NOW! – Elgin

Without you out there, we're nowhere here

by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Things are getting pretty bromantic in here.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why have the Captain

when it’ll be Hedo, B-Roy, Rudy, LMA, and Greg on the floor at the end of quarters. Blake is the one with less minutes, Bayless should take some of Steve’s minutes too.
Having Hedo takes the ball out of Blake’s hands.

by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Signing Hedo means no pg

Hedo’s skill-set involves being a point-forward. Having him play that position means that the pg is not as much a necessity.

I don’t see a combo of Hedo and Hinrich.

It would be far too expensive. We need to sign our players to extensions, and signing both Hedo and Kirk would cut into our ability to do that.

by Jackalope 66 on Jul 2, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the lopsided trade could still be done

Outlaw+Blake for Hinrich. Chicago would bank the expiring contracts of Steve/Travis next July to the tune of 7.6 mil

Do I think it’s likely? Not so much after Gordon left

And I think Portland is contemplating a Roy-Rudy-Turk-LMA-Oden lineup

length > strength

New defensive strategy: pack the paint, and pray the other team doesn’t make 20+ three-pointers against you

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would make sense minutewise if a lopsided trade happined.

And Hinrich would be perfect with Hedo. Good perimeter defense and he would be a good spot up shooter in the Hedo & Roll.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hedo Fans

Hedo is a great guy to have on your team. Willing to do what he is told, take clutch shots, etc.
BUT…isn’t anyone wondering why instead of resigning Hedo, the Magic opted to go with a guy two years his senior instead? The reason is simple, the Magic’s system made Hedo above average (chuck away at 3’s, have one of the most dangerous dunkers in the league drawing attention down low, and a host of great 3 point shooters spreading the flor), but the bottom line is he is a good solid player, but not a 10 mil/tr. player. The Magic had him for 5 years, they should know more than anyone if he is worth that right? Coming off a championship berth and all, they decided to blow up the team and let Hedo go because he wanted that much money. Sounds to me like a great big flare just went up. The Magic relied on Hedo more than anyone when Jameer went down and they still deem him expendable at that price, but other teams are willing to stomach it?

I could see the Magic getting bullied into that price because their fans are all sentimental about the Finals berth, but why are other teams jumping off the cliff blindly thinking that they will land on something doft? If the only team that looked over the edge and saw what was below said uh-uh, no way, then what the hell are the rest of you doing? The Blazers have one of the most exciting lineups in the NBA, why get a point forward that can NOT create his own shot, relies on having a dominant post player with major spacing from 3 point shooting and a screen to make a play. This isn’t Roy or Wade who can create in traffic. This is a guy that needs a wide open lane and a head of steam.

That being said, you will get a good player in Hedo, and a good locker room guy. I am just saying he won’t be worth that kind of money, this year, next year, or in 4 years. But there is no turning back now, so I hope I am wrong!

by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man

So many typos so little time. Sorry.
But the moral of the story is on point.

by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

flagged

you’re not supposed to point out typos. You’re outta heeere. jk

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jul 2, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep in mind

that we also intend to have a dominant big with sharp shooters all around ………plus Roy

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jul 2, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm

I wouldn’t put Portland in the dominant big man category just yet.

by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he did say "intend to have"

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good perspective

but KP and Nate know what they are doing better than me.

by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The good news is

That Hedo won’t be a total loss no matter what, he has definite skills that will last a long time. He doesn’t rely on speed so the age thing isn’t really a factor. He isn’t a good defender so he can’t get much worse. And you don’t have to be a good defender when you are 6’10 to be honest, you can get the job done just by putting your hands up. So even though he isn’t worth that much money, he isn’t a bad pick up, my former vent did not point that out well enough.

by Eric9321 on Jul 2, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am coming around to the idea of having a point forward.

It would make us one of the more unique styles of play in the league with 3 legit ballhandling options in the starting lineup.

And Hedo is totally a better #3 option right now for our offense. When he gets older and less effective, hopefully one of our young studs would be ready to step into a #3 option by then.

More talent added to the team does necessitate a larger trade by what we are free to give up. I say we instantly become a more flexable team.

Ugh, that is the best I have after 24 hours of digestion.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fun new game:

did this come from canzano’s latest or hedo’s wiki page?

Turkoglu was born in Istanbul. He grew up speaking Serbian, which his parents still speak to him. It’s why as a rookie in Sacramento he became close friends with Vlade Divac and Peja Stojakovic. He called them “Brother Vlade” and “Brother Peja.”

blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter

by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Batum ~ Ariza

Isn’t Batum the same player Ariza was two seasons ago? I just wouldn’t understand taking a Batum-clone rather than just letting Batum develop.

by misterblack on Jul 2, 2009 9:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Exactly what I was thinking.

Hedo would help take the pressure off Roy and give us anther guy to initiate the offense. Ariza does not do this for us at all. We already have what Ariza is bringing to the table… and for a lot less money.

by BlazerBen on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

Batum is better. Bigger skill set and higher ceiling than Ariza 2 years pasr.

Of course, Ariza is better right now. But if Batum is given starter PT next season, I don’t think you would be able to say the same thing by the end of the regular season.

by xedubx on Jul 2, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batum's already hitting the 3.

Ariza finially became effective by developing a moderately legit offensive game. Batum is halfway there, the attacking the basket thing needs to come next.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dwight Jaynes is smoking something....

….if he thinks Hedo is getting 36 minutes a game.

Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldrdige got 37 minutes per game last year. And he thinks Turkoglu is gonna step in and take as big a role as those two guys??? There’s no way in the world that happens.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Then how many minutes is he going to get per game?

35?

blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter

by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thoughts

assuming Hedo, the minutes breakdown looks to me to be:
Roy 36
LMA 36
Hedo 32
Rudy 30
Greg 28
Joel 18
Batum 20
Blake 24
Bayless 16

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

can you break those down

even more? Like how Hedo/Batum will split the SF minutes, and how Roy/Rudy will split the SG minutes. Because just looking at that it doesn’t seem possible, I thought Jaynes did a pretty good job of explaining how it won’t work.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

it would work if Hedo played the Travis role and backed up LMA. If not, then it doesn’t work.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

idk

it still seems like too many minutes for too many players.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It seems like a moderately effective 9 man rotation.

Either way, if Rudy isn’t traded. He has earned more minutes and the 6th man role.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outlaw had 27.7 minutes per game last year.

That sounds about right for Hedo to me.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

read down - I didn't forget him

but fine, plug Martell in instead of Batum. We still have the same problem.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here is another alternative that includes Martell

Pos
1 Blake/Bayless 34 Roy 14
2 Roy 24 Rudy 24
3 Web 20 Nic 15 Turk 13
4 LMA 30 Turk 18
5 Oden 28 Pryz 14 LMA 6

This is a very versatile lineup that is adjustable for team and game time situations.

I am not promoting this – I am solidly in the no-Turk camp but it can work.

by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

10 man rotation?

not for long…something’s gotta give eventually. Nic needs more that 15mpg, Rudy needs more that 24mpg, Bayless could soon want/need more than 14mpg.

yeah, maybe we could try that for a couple months, but we would only be driving down the trade value of some of these guys.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why does Batum need more than 15 mpg?

At this point he’s nothing more than an offensively challenged defender. If there are better guys in front of you on the depth chart, you don’t get minutes.

by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

in a couple of months, someone will get dinged up

Seriously, I think GMs tend to “overstock” their rosters in case of injury. How many times do you hear that a winning team “weathered the storm” of injuries because they had quality depth?

The coach and the fans may complain about “too many players, not enough minutes” and you can be sure the young players and their agents want all the PT they can get so they can “cash in” at contract time. Meanwhile, the GM just tries to smooth over PT conflicts and waits for somebody to get hurt to “resolve” the issue.

The best solution? Mix in some vets who know their role and shut their mouth and sit around until their number is called. Those are the kind of guys who win playoff series, not the 20-25 year-olds, anyway…

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love the use of "Quotations"

I was thinking of the Farley bit…

I don’t “practice” good “hygene”…
I don’t “brush” my teeth"…

"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake

by RudyisSick! on Jul 2, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i did elsewhere, but here goes again

PG Blake 24, Bayless 16, Rudy 8
SG Roy 26, Rudy 22
SF Hedo 18, Batum 20, Roy 10
PF LMA 34, Hedo 14
C Greg 28, Joel 18, LMA 2

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can we count on Rudy playing 8 minutes at the PG?

I like Rudy’s play making abilities, but he did terrible at that spot when he played there last year. If this goes down I would love to be proved wrong though.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he could if Turkoglu and Roy are actually running the point and he’s just defending it.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

right

call Roy the PG for those 8 minutes if you want. it doesn’t matter. the point is that its a roy/rudy backcourt

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that would be a very intriguing end of game lineup.

Turk-Roy-Rudy-LMA-Oden

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which went badly last year.

If Hedo can improve that by being a ball handler, okay. I can see why you would try it. Still a little leery of it though.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hedo could

That could indeed be the missing link. Turkoglu played a lot of PG when Jameer Nelson got injured. Wow, I actually hadn’t thought about that 4th quarter lineup. It excites me.

by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yup, that is the lineup i like...

assuming that turkey is coming to pdx (which i do not support b/c contract). i’d be able to get behind sharing the PG duties b/w turk and roy, with rudy being there to help take it up if necessary. in fact, i think that would be the blazers best lineup (including potential free agents and the terrible kirk hinrich types). i think rudy still comes off the bench, but should be playing the majority of the 2nd half like with the other starters.

by retirecards51 on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but but but!!!!

who gets the 2 extra minutes at the 2 guard you didn’t give to Roy or Rudy!

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where's Martell?

Assuming he’s healthy. Where are his minutes?

SAY NO TO HEDO.

by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats the problem I've been pointing out for two days

Signing Hedo mean Travis is gone for sure, and one of two other things is happening:

Either Martell will not be ready to play come fall, OR someone from the Martell/Rudy/Batum trio is going to be sitting the bench or traded.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably Martell

For a backup PF I would hope, or PG.

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

except martell has basically no trade value right now

my guess is whoever is moved is part of a package with Outlaw

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't bank on him not being healthy.

Also, his trade value would be fairly low. I hardly think that Batum in his second year ranks higher and deserves more minutes than Webster. That’s one reason why i don’t quite understand this purchase.

SAY NO TO HEDO.

by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly, me either

which leads to one of 3 conclusions:

1) Martell won’t be ready, and the team knows it
2) Someone from the Rudy/Batum/Martell trio is getting traded (along with Outlaw)
3) KP and team are screwing up big time by allowing a valuable player to rot on the bench.

My hope is that it’s (2), my fear is that it’s (1), and my nightmare is that it’s (3)

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Realistically I think it's #3.

With the idea that it may be #1.

I still think Martell is too young to give up on, 4 years in (really 3) out of highschool, has several years left to hit his prime. Good affordable contract. His work ethic is amazing, talks about focusing on his defensive abilities. He could become a well rounded player. Bringing in Hedo is counter-intuitive.

I don’t believe conclusion #2 is realistic. Rookie contract, rookie contract, and $4 mil contract with low trade value respectively. Not good trade chips but all high potential players.

SAY NO TO HEDO.

by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like D

D) we don’t know anything

blah blah blah blah lame comment - lame commenter

by Bandwagon Butcher on Jul 2, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We really don't.

But what we do know is what’s scaring me.

SAY NO TO HEDO.

by dpnim on Jul 2, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wrote a whole fanpost on that

Demonstrating how much I didn’t know. Again.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Jul 2, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

WE don't know, but I sure hope KP and crew do

They likely have a pretty good inkling on Martell’s status. They darn well better have some follow-up plans in place to signing Hedo. Thus, while (3) is the worst case, it also seems the most unlikely to me. This team does it’s homework. they aren’t floundering around making moves in a vacuum like Chris Wallace (dumping Gasol’s 33 million contract just so they can end up getting ZBo’s 34 million)

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He would get close...

I’d say he’d get close to 36 minutes a game + or – a few. If we blow our cap space and give this guy close to 50 million it’s going to be for him to be a starter and play starter minutes. I’d expect that at the very least until Hedo is closer to his Mid 30’s and also closer to the end of his contract here, he’s playing the starter minutes very comparable to Brandon and LMA.

Also with Hedo, it might be about the money. But in General I’d say Dwight is incorrect to say it is ALWAYS about the money. What have we seen here? Pryzbilla chose Portland, when equal or better money could of been had. Rudy sacrificed significant Euro’s to come play for Portland. So it’s rare, but clearly NOT ALWAYS about the money.

On the other end of the spectrum we have Canzano’s contention that we need to convince Hedo that Portland has good Pizza, and point out that we have rivers? Equally as ridiculous.

Somewhere between Dwight and Canzano is the truth. My feeling. Borrow one of Paul Allens Yachts, take Hedo down the beautiful Willamette all the while serving him Pizza covered in money .

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 2, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I felt like I used to be able to rely on Dwight for substance… he always struck me as a solid meat and potatoes writer, but lately he seems a little more sensationalistic (maybe from hangin around bojack and the 95.5 crew too much?).

Last time I read or listened to Canzano, he was nowhere near the truth. Has he changed? Actually no don’t tell me, I don’t care.

I think Krang is closest to the truth. And yes it’s mostly but not 100% about the Benjamins.

MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)

by The Cactus Leaguer on Jul 2, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

could you imagine Paul Allen's

Octopus yaucht rolling down the Willamette this afternoon? lol

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

There has to be another option. These all suck.

It took my two years to come up with an avatar and sig
and this is the best I could come up with.

by einman77 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a well constructed poll.

In real life all the choices always suck.

by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently Turkoglu actually rates as a really good defender.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He's actually a pretty good positional defender.

He doesn’t have super athleticism or anything, so he’s not the kinda guy who makes highlight reel blocks, but he’s good at staying in front of his man and placing himself in areas that disrupt passing lanes. He does lack quickness, however. Faster SF’s can give him trouble.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I generally agree……. he’s not Rodman, but he’s not the Radman.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's so damn big

A legit 6’10 forward, and he did play under Stan Van Gundy. Not as good as Ariza, but I think Hedo is akin to Hinrich on defense. Tougher than expected, won’t back down from better players, and won’t be embarrassed to get burned or dunked on.

The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.

by Ozzie Montana on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hinrich has much better defensive instincts and intensity

From a physical standpoint, you’re pretty close to right, but Hinrich is a far better defender in terms of mentality.

That said, I’d be very, very happy with a Hinrich/Roy/Hedo 1-2-3 with Rudy and Batum as the bench guys

by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I had to choose between Ariza and Turk, I'd say Ariza

Not only does that hurt the Lakers, but he seems like a better fit. $40 million is way too much money though.

The free agent money should instead be spent upgrading the PG and getting a backup PF. SF doesn’t seem like as big as need as those holes, especially if we have Martell back and healthy (which is a moderate sized if at this point)

by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But if we can get a scorer

I’d take that to take the pressure off #7.

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't the hope be...

…that LMA and Oden (especially Oden) further develop their offensive games to alleviate the scoring pressure on Roy. Of course, that doesn’t help in terms of perimeter scoring, which Turk would do.

It just boils down to whether you think we need to upgrade the defense (my choice) or the offense.

by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turkoglu is a statistically good defender.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I caught wind of this earlier.

Do you have the numbers per chance? Not to question you, just to satisfy my own curiosity at your expense.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely. Here’s a breakdown of Turkoglu’s defensive stats from the guys at Third Quarter Collapse.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you.

I’m pretty lazy sometimes.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course, I don’t put a whole lot of weight into defensive stats. It’s just an interesting point for the crowd trying to figure out why KP wants Hedo.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we should make trades to "hurt another team"

Also, Isn’t Ariza just as likely to get picked up by another team (a la Toronto) if we don’t get him. Damage done. Lakers are over cap, so they need to downsize, Ariza wants full pay.

I hate the idea of Ariza coming to P-town after what he did to Rudy. Not sure if it’s rumors or what, but if the Hedu trade “infuriated” Rudy, how do you think he would like Ariza coming to town?

"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake

by RudyisSick! on Jul 2, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What what what???
Back to Devin Harris real quick: would you like to see him running the break with Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge? Many would. Because he could have been had on draft night. The New Jersey Nets were reportedly shopping him for expiring contracts and draft picks. Not sure if he is still on the market, but it’s worth Kevin Pritchard inquiring about with Rod Thorn.

That is from the Wendell Maxey link above from Ben. I can’t believe that KP would not pull the trigger to get Harris on Draft night if all it would have taken was some expiring deals/low cost players. And if that is still the case, then Blake+Outlaw would work under the 125%+$100K rule to get him here, and they both expire this year for NJ. Get that deal done KP!

PS: I can’t believe this to be true, just too crazy that a player like Harris would be available for so little.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

the rumors said they want a young PG on a rookie contract back

so maybe that’s the hangup. Im assuming we would throw bayless into that offer in a heartbeat, but maybe they don’t think he’s the guy for them. perhaps after a strong summer league running the piont, they can be persuaded to change their mind?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that is the case

then by all means throw bayless into that deal, it still works under the CBA.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

if the rumors are true, and KP hasn’t offered NJ Outlaw, picks, and Euros, plus their choice of Bayless/Blake and Rudy/Batum then I’d be disappointed. Batum would be the one guy I would hesitate on, but I’d probably still do it

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We should send NJ Euros...

Right now they are stronger then the dollar by quite a bit.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you can do that deal with some combination of

Bayless, Outlaw, Rudy, Blake, cash and picks, you need to pull the trigger.

by Furious Styles on Jul 2, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Brainer.

Blake, Outlaw, Bayless and any future 1st rounders they want, absolutely. After being reminded this year of what 1st round picks do for good teams (nothing) they could send out the next 5 picks for all I care.

Then sign Turkey and Anthony Carter with the cap space.

Harris / Rudy / Carter
Roy / Rudy
Turk / Batum / Martell
LaMarcus / Pendergraph
Oden / Prz

Championship.

by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

your comment, and those above about this same topic all tell me what I think we all already knew…

no way this deal was available to KP, or it would have been done.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would be a beyond nasty team

I might go a different way with the depth PG, but that’s a minor part of it.

by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't have the kind of crappy expiring deals anymore other teams do and are easily willing to part with

KP doesn’t want to throw Blake and Travis away, obviously. The last such contract we had was Raef.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That it is Maxey reporting it carries some weight.

Except for the fact that he’s reporting it as a rumor. Reportedly shopping him. That’s the classic unattributed comment reference. For all we know, someone called up Thorn and asked if Harris could be had. Thorn says “What are you offering?” That becomes “New Jersey is reportedly shopping Harris.”

My rule number 1 in discussing possible trade or FA signing moves – believe nothing that you hear. What will be will be.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe this explains the Hedo signing

Like others, I’m still not convinced we’re going to sign Hedo and try to fit him in without another major trade already set up. Two of our current small forwards would need to go to make room for him. A combination of Outlaw, Bayless, Webster, and other low-cost contracts/picks/cash might be slated to go already for Harris. Which would leave us with Harris/Blake, Roy/Fernandez, Hedo/Batum, LMA/(Pendergraph or TBD), Oden/Przybilla.. great rotation.

by amitp06 on Jul 2, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looks like Hedoism

Which I’m quite fine with. We need another scorer to take pressure off of Roy.

Oh and Rudy, don’t worry, you’ll get your minutes.

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 9:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Turk

50 mill is too much, but what you are paying for is the fact that of this free agent class, he is the only guy who is multidimensional. Everybody else is a one trick pony. Ben Gordon? Only scores. C-nuva? Scores. Ariza? Defends. Turkoglu is the only one that can both get his own shot and create for others.

A crunch time lineup of Roy/Fernandez/Turkoglu/ Lamarcus/Oden would be much harder to defend than what we had last year. Acquiring Hedo makes us better.

Defense wasn’t the problem in the playoffs, it was that all you had to do to beat the Blazers was manhandle Roy because no one else could facilitate.

by JPop on Jul 2, 2009 9:53 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

ya know

and its not really a knock on blake and outlaw, its just that those two are limited offensively. Outlaw is an end point scorer with limited passing and handling ability and Blake is an outlet three guy. Not necessarily a bad thing unless you ask them to shoulder the responsibility of running an offense.

by JPop on Jul 2, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ARTESSSSSST

Give me Ron or give me death

by Twith on Jul 2, 2009 9:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

For some reason, it wouldn't surprise me if the Cleveland Cavaliers and the Houston Rockets did a ...

sign-and-trade deal wherein the ballclubs swapped Anderson Varejao and Ron Artest. With Artest on the Cavaliers, LeBron James would transition to a combo forward on both ends of the court. The Cavaliers could then sign Rasheed Wallace to the mid-level exception and have a three-man rotation at the forward positions of James, Artest, and Wallace.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harris

Right now, I’m fine with our group of small forwards, assuming Martell comes back healthy. I just really want to pick up Devin Harris. Please?

by roynfernandez on Jul 2, 2009 9:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

John Canzano's article in the Oregonian this morning is pure fluff.

Ridiculous. Oh, let’s show Hedo we’re down with Turkish culture so he’ll play here. PLEASE. How about you do a real story, JC?

Hedo should be trying to impress us. I swear if he gets a 5/50 deal, I’ll puke.

by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 10:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Its a real as anything JC ever does

At least he’s not hating on us for no reason this time.

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

I guess you didn’t listen to his radio show last night. He had some guy on there who was a Turkey “expert” to talk about what the Blazers should do to so Hedo that Portland is a great place for a Turkish player! Sometimes that guy is just a moron.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you mention that.

I sent in a text saying the interview was a horrible waste of time. He actually replied back via text: “I don’t think so.”

What a clown.

by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I flipped the dial at that point.

I think Hedo’s an alright player, but I don’t know why it’s so important to jock Turkey like it’s actually a cool country or something.

And as far as the lack of Turkish restaurants in Portland (as mentioned in his article), could it be because Turkish food sucks?!

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

- from Quick's Behind the Blazers Locker Room Door, 4/16/09

by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but

according to Canzano’s Turkish “expert” Turkey is all about the food!

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t know. I was just disappointed when I picked up an atlas as a kid and found a map of Turkey, only to find that it was not in fact shaped like the outline of a turkey.

Friggin’ jerks. That would’ve been awesome.

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

- from Quick's Behind the Blazers Locker Room Door, 4/16/09

by ArbyOSU on Jul 2, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess it depends on your definition of cool ...

… but I have friends who have visited Turkey and think it is very cool.

And as a history buff, I can tell you Turkey is about as cool as it gets.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

musicians I know that have studied music in Turkey

come back to the US sounding a lot better. – Elgin

Without you out there, we're nowhere here

by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what did the expert have to say?

That turkey isn’t just for Thanksgiving anymore?

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do we care so much about Turkey's price?

The Blazers will be handcuffed cap-wise for the indefinite future, regardless of what they do this summer. If you want them to do something else with that $8M Italic phrasethis summer_Italic phrase_ then great. If you’re expecting something else grand over the next year or two, it isn’t happening.

Hedo at 4 years $32M vs. 5 years $50M won’t make any difference in what they do over that period, it will only impact Paul Allen’s wallet. The price is virtually irrelevant.

by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup I mean we'll max out Roy, LMA and probably Oden

In the next few years anyways.

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Jul 2, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually it is a big deal

If the Blazers want to renounce all of their exceptions and players they can actually get down to about $49 million or just under in salary cap salaries. That means if they do that, then sign Hedo to an $8 million per year deal, (which will start below $8 million in the first year most likely) their team salary would go up to about a max $57 million, (although depending on the contract it could be as little as $55 million) and depending on the salary cap number they could still be under it slightly, maybe even slightly enough to sign another FA, (possibly a back up PF?) or make a trade that uses that cap space, etc…

So it is important for flexiblilty later this same summer, if they give him a $10 million per avg that flexability will be gone.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see that...

My point though was that Turkey for $10M is much more useful than no Turkey and some role players. There isn’t really another starter-quality player available through free agency, and they already have plenty of role players.

by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair point, but - meh - I'm not worried

If KP thinks Hedo is not the final piece, then there is no way he’d sign him to a deal that prevents further movement.

The cap space will probably be soaked up one way or the other, either through FA signings or imbalanced trades. I believe they will use it wisely.

MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)

by The Cactus Leaguer on Jul 2, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trade value

If we sign him to a huge contract and then decide we don’t want him any more in a year or two, he’ll be impossible to trade. If we sign him to a reasonable contract though, he could be a valuable trade asset.

by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

zach randolph just got trade again

he makes $17 million per. I would never say trading Hedo in 3 years, when he’s got 2 years left at 10-11 per is impossible.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw it

as an exchange of garbage.

by JPop on Jul 2, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the clips picked up a 9 million dollar 2010 expiring

and dumped 25 million is salary obligations. That’s nothing to sneeze at.

My point is this, IF Hedo has wilted 3 years from now, and/or others have overtaken him, the prospects of moving his 2 year, 24 million dollar contract is not going to be much different than moving his 2 year, 20 million dollar deal.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even if Hedo wilts, it is reasonable to assume he will be a competent back-up

I still say no to Hedo, but he is still a quality NBA player in the right system.

by Sonic Boom on Jul 2, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

WHY WHY WHY?

Can anyone answer why we are even considering a SF when we have Batum And Webster and Outlaw, and why we arent looking at a PG and a backup PF?

by cavejunctionblazer on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe because...

Turk is a pretty big upgrade at the SF position and provides some valuable veteran leadership.

by lrh86 on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

define "pretty big upgrade"

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Jul 2, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As in...

Hedo is a much better player right now than Batum, Outlaw, or Martell. Pretty self-expanatory if you ask me.

by lrh86 on Jul 2, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ill try

1) Outlaw will never where a blazer uniform again. book it
2) Webster may not be ready to go come fall
3) Batum isn’t ready for 36 minutes per game
4) This team desperately needs another player who can create offense and score the ball. Hedo is the best available guy who can do both those things, and he won’t cost us any players to get.
5) backup PF is a secondary or tertiary need – we are talking about 12 minutes a game here. Either we think the rookies can cover it, ore more likely we are going to slot Hedo into most of those minutes to create mismatches and get more time on the floor for our talented wing players.
6) upgrading the PG position in the way we would like is likely not feasible at this time, and/or too costly

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

hehe *wear*, not *where*

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec.

If a major upgrade at PG isn’t available (priority 1), a major upgrade at SF is the next best thing. The opportunity is this summer. Do something now or ride with what you’ve got…I’d rather do something now.

by Free Bayless on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PG

Also, we might be making both deals. Getting Hedo doesn’t mean we can’t make a PG trade. Might actually help with it (can trade more pieces).

by pualo on Jul 2, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

He is the best available option right now.

by rydog9991 on Jul 2, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

With every one of your points, potentially barring the last one. Something could have already been agreed upon.

by TheMadKiwi on Jul 2, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well that's my hope

but I"m trying to address the original points without speculating on any possible follow ups

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

#7

Playoff Experience

by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

great addtion

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"3) Batum isn’t ready for 36 minutes per game"

Next year maybe not.

But is Batum backup material for the next 5 years?……NOT!

You will lose his intensity and drive to be better and him in the short run to another team.

by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

but if Hedo gets 4 years, the middle of year 3, Nic takes over and Hedo comes off the bench.
Then Hedo is traded as an expiring contract in the 4th year. Nic should be able to see the logic in that.

by DucRider on Jul 2, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we can pretty much force him to stay for a long time, happy or not. he’ll be restricted.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

moreover

injuries do happen and if you’ve got a deep ballclub, they hurt less. – Elgin

Without you out there, we're nowhere here

by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think of our Cap space at that time

Roy, LA, and Oden would be maxed and Hedo at $10 mil.

You think the Blazer would even try to match other team’s offers?
NOT a chance.

by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batum probably won't be truly a quality starter

For at least another two years and more likely three. At this point Turkoglu would be slowing down and needing fewer minutes (I’m assuming), so he can become a high-level 6th man and Batum can start.

by GMan83201 on Jul 2, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is that your hope to make this deal sound positive for the future?

You must not have watched very many other 1st year starters.

Remember Batum played previously in Europe and the poise and confidence you noticed,
if you had been watching closely, was/is rare.

Remember also that Batum was suppose to split minutes with other players
(Roy, Rudy, Webster, and Outlaw).
All of that mix of talent was suppose to be a plus for any coach.
The problem was not enough minutes to go around.
Now there could be only 15-19 minutes to spread around.

by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

After ruminating, I do feel slightly better knowing that if we do sign H*DO for a big contract...

it will allow us to trade him as an expiring contract in a few years, to some team that wants to unload a player who will actually help us in our run, we could toss in a draft pick & cash as sweeteners

by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hedo is not going to get a 5/$50 deal

Everything that we have heard in the media concerning the length and size of his contract was floated by his agent. The original story, released tuesday, quoted the agent as the source of the 5/50$ deal. Now that Toronto, Detroit and Orlando have all pulled out of the Hedo sweepstakes, we are essentially bidding in a vacuum, with know competition to drive up the price. I believe that we could sign him to a 5/45$ or even a 4/$36 deal.

Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.

by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 10:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

perhaps a lowball offer?

Hedo gave up 7.3, but to “secure the future for his family” means length and total contract. Hopefully, the door is still open for negotiation as I would suppose the Blazers want to know if he is interested before offering a specific amount. Hedo and Babby will certainly listen to other offers as well.

So, try to sell him on Portland’s future, good locker room, stability, and need to improve the team with some remaining cap flexibility; perhaps starting at 7 and escalating 20% for 4 or 5 years, or starting with 8 or 9 and reducing (as Hinrich did at Chicago). If he simply accepts the max contract, let him shop around.

If all else fails, keep the cap space and shop at the trade deadline for the best player from all those teams already out of the playoffs. I LIKE THIS OPTION BEST!!

Also, with Gordon going to Detroit, Chicago will now keep Hinrich for a 3 man rotation with Rose and Salmons.

by kacee on Jul 2, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a frontloaded contract would be ideal

Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.

by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you have to go 4 years - so in 3 when he diminishes in value on the court he will have huge value as an expiring contract

Heck – maybe KP says our window gloriously open in 3 years and that sort of trade could be huge to get the last piece. Maybe Turk is the bandaide.

by Sonic Boom on Jul 2, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've been on the fence about Hedo, but at this point..

I’ve got to assume that they have exhausted all of their options of making some sort of lopsided trade and have decided to go after the FA they felt would best help the team and spend that money now. Lord knows they won’t have that money next year when they max out Roy and Aldridge and then Oden the year after that. So I guess, it’s do something now or not do something later. I’m going to put my faith in KP and his staff that they know what they are doing (most likely they understand bb a lot better than I do). Heck, they had a 54 win team with practically all draft picks. And there are a few good things about Hedo that this team needs.
1. Veteran with playoff experience
2. Pick and Roll with GO (AKA the next Dwight Howard)
3. Has a good rebound average considering Dwight Howard was his teammate.
4. Has a good assist average considering Jameer Nelson was his teammate (granted he was out for half of the year)
5. Is versatile and can play different positions
6. Good ball handler
7. Good passer
8. Plays team basketball
9. Good locker room personality
Time will tell if this is a good move, but I’m reserving judgement until I’ve seen them play together for a little while.

by jenstcy on Jul 2, 2009 11:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The Pick and Roll possibilities have me salivating

Side PnR with Hedo and GO with LMA spotting up midrange or corner 3
Pick and Pop with Roy and LMA, Roy and Hedo

also imagine the baseline plays and backdoor cuts we could run with the ball in Hedo’s hands. The difference between Hedo on Orlando and Hedo in Portland is that the opponents can’t put their best perimeter defender on Hedo (i.e. Ariza). Since the Roy Wonder demands attention from 1-3 players at all times, the lane is going to be more open for Turkoglu drives and inversely the same will be true for Roy.
I also think that getting Hedo will allow us to keep Blake and not regret it later. Blake is one of the best 3 point shooters in the league, and all of the PGs we are looking at (save Hinrich) are subpar deep shooters. With Hedo and Roy on the floor, Blake’s lack of playmaking ability will mostly become a dead issue. With all that said, I wouldn’t mind hinrich as PG, since he replicates most of Blake’s role with the added bonus of better defense. I believe we will have to deal one or more of our current SFs, for the sake of playing time and waste, but the target will probably be a veteran PF and not a PG.

Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.

by Jiggamant on Jul 2, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly.

This move gives us an offense. I know BEdgers will say we had the #1 offense last year, but it had little balance, and proved to be our downfall in the playoffs.

I have been saying that this was a problem with our offensive philosophy which is very conservative. Nate Mcmillen would probably defend that he hasn’t had the personnel to diversify the offense.

That’s probably why Nate is high on Turkoglu. Because he would do just that: diversify and balance the offense.

And if he can do this, he’s worth all of that.

by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that's more situational than anything else.

Houston is a tough offensive matchup for anybody, especially considering their two best defenders were glued to our #1 player the entire series.

I don’t think we would have had the offensive stalls we had in the Houston series if we played any of the other 6 teams in the playoffs, Lakers included.

by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, in NBA games, you get in to situations! ;)

You’re free to disagree, as you seem inclined to. But these issues were there all of last season. Not just against Houston. Our game works against the poor-mid level teams in the league. But we are solvable. Houston solved us. But another elite team would have as well.

Fundamentally: If you don’t play a team offense that can adapt to the other team taking away your first, second options, you’re going to lose. I thought we began to develop a team offensive identity as the season progressed, but whenever faced with adversity, we retreated to the BRoy show. And that simply won’t do it.

by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Blazin' is 100% right

I’ve been saying it all year. We got more than we could ever hope for out of our stagnant isolation-based offense with only one creator on the roster. I think our offensive efficiciency is much more of a testament to our individual abilities and offensive rebounding prowess than to any good offensive scheme or design.

our “#1 offense in the leauge” rating was always fool’s gold – come playoff time, teams ratchet up the defense and take away your first options. We had no reliable second options to go to.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ie I'm fine with adding another creator to the offense and I do think its important

… but that playoff series shouldn’t change what we learned from 82 games— defense needs to be a higher priority than offense for this team.

by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree on the defense

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a very high priority is to improve our performance in the early parts of games. Much of that is attributed to needing a second playmaker.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree

Houston exposed this weakness more than most other teams, but even had we gotten past them, it would have been similarly exposed.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

our offense would have looked better

but I don’t think we had enough defense last year to sniff a win at Staples.

by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are most likely right.

But I was of the opinion that Portland matched up against LA better than anyone else in the west. I’d have to agree that it would not have changed the outcome, but then funny things can happen. Had we faced LA in the second round, perhaps Karma would have made an appearance at Staples.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Houston is a tough offensive matchup for anybody

No doubt, they gave L*A more trouble than anyone else, and that was WITHOUT Yao for much of the series

Portland, OTOH, had to face Ming at the peak of his game

Little has changed for me, since the end of game 6: I still support upgrading the roster and not “standing pat”. The “Outlaw experiment” should be over and a better PG than Blake would be nice. (But if Hedo is signed, I suspect the Blazers may feel like they have “enough” at the starting/backup PG position with Steve and Jerryd)

So, if KP can bring in a couple of veterans at PF/C and at #3 PG that may be “it” for roster improvement. We’ll see

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Webster's gonna take the pressure off

I think we’re forgetting about how good of a shooter Webster is, which is gonna take the double teaming off Roy and LA a ton (not all the time, but more than last year). Plus, who knows how many three’s we’re gonna get because of him.

No to Hedo

by DJRazorburn on Jul 2, 2009 11:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Let's Understand this more than salaries and stats

In the entertainment industry, there are multiple angles to the same result. After reading some people’s replies over the last few days, there have been some great points, but what I think we all are missing, is the practicality of it all.

KP is the GM. Seats need to be filled at the Rose Garden, and what better way to increase hype over last year than to bring on a luxury name item like a Hedo. That’s why I see this as being attractive. Sure, it may hurt cap space, and it probably cripples the Blazers for a while, but they’re a young team. I guarantee you that as much as we may love them now, if they every DO win a championship, it won’t be with the current roster. The Phoenix Suns were in the same predicament, they needed to revamp their roster, so they brought on Nash, an aging but still efficient guard, they had a promising big man in Amar’e, and then they had Marion.

You can say it didn’t work, but the concept is the same, from a business perspective. They filled seats, they got primetime TV, they sold jerseys, and they increased their status. They played a fast-paced, uptempo style that got them far, but not far enough.

What’s my point? It’s simple. In order to keep a fan base happy, a team needs to show progress. The Knicks stink. They were worse before though, and the fans lost total interest. Bring in Mike D’Antoni, David Lee breaks out, and Robinson flourishes in that style of play, and suddenly, they’re getting better, and they’re generating interest.

It’s different in PDX because fans there are loyal. People loved the Blazers through the dark ages of Rip City, and will continue to love them still – but from a GM perspective, you HAVE to do something to “improve” from last year.

Put it this way: If the Blazers don’t make a move, they are counting that experience alone will pay off and they can increase their performance over last year. That’s possible, but in that example, if the don’t crush their record from last year, then people will be here, and on the radio, and on TV, saying that they SHOULD have done something. If they do worse than last year, then it’s disaster, because it totally undermines their reputation as an up and coming team, and transforms them into fluke overachievers, both results are detrimental to the team and the public image.

This puts the Blazers in a tough spot. If they DO sign someone like Hedo, it’s great for sales of tickets, and it puts Portland on the map. Like him or not, he’s pretty much A-list NBA caliber at this point, being that he was a main player on a team that went to the championships. Think Mo Williams here, sidekick to Lebron maybe, but still a great player. I won’t bother making size, stat or performance observations in this post, because I don’t think there’s a right answer, it’s all opinion.

Hedo brings you instant media coverage, instant buzz, and an instant jump up the NBA’s totem pole. With Hedo you start getting respect of other teams, referee’s, and other fans. The Blazers go from being a young up and coming team with a lone star in Brandon Roy, to suddenly, the surging powerhouse with Hedo, Roy and LA.

This is why I think it’s a BAD move. It’s strictly PR based. The Blazers have to know that they’re not ready to win anything yet. They’re a good 3 years from peaking at their current roster if they continue to improve, and you can’t win with Roy, LA, and Hedo. Oden is still an unknown commodity, Outlaw’s defense is suspect, and Batum is still developing.

Bringing Ariza in would improve defense, but it doesn’t make sense, because the Blazers need to add players who contribute to their potency, not just lock down the perimeter. They already play good defense, I mean, c’mon, are people already forgetting we beat the Lakers? Outlaw is a weak link, but he’s vital in an offensive scheme because it’s like a shooting Marion, he can play multiple positions, he’s gifted athletically, and better yet, he’s improving and isn’t a diva like Marion has eluded to being.

I think the best move is the bite the bullet, don’t make a major commitment to a big name player this year, work on Greg, Jerryd, and Travis, and then make your move next year. Martell is still on the fence, but maybe he comes back and works back into the rotation. You can use Rudy experimentally to see what exactly one could get from him at the NBA level, and then you leave yourself open to nab a marquee player to accompany Roy when they’re more experienced and ready to make a serious run deep into the Playoffs.

I’d hate to see the Blazers get impatient at the last minute and sign away the future of the team, because we’d just end up where we were 7 years ago, losing to teams in the Playoffs with big name players who have huge contracts, and we’ve worked so hard to break away from that mold.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:00 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

KP, is that you?

Haha. Nice post.

I miss Martell. Come back soon!

by mannyfresh1 on Jul 2, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

:)

Just trying to add in the other 50% of the equation which seems to often be overlooked in fan debate

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now from a basketball perspective

The Blazers are at a crossroads I think. They need to determine how they want to succeed. They have players who serve roles in different styles of play, as now as they are getting better, they need to address this.

Players like Roy like half court, controlling the ball and penetrating. Jerryd can do that too, with work, and create his own shot. Without 1 on 1 players though, if you play half court offense, there will always be a lot of standing around. They need to decide, are they going to run more, get out on the break and use their athletic wing players for scoring and add a quality PG who can distribute on a break (Kidd, Nash, Harris, etc) or do they want a player who can add to their half court set (Hedo).

You can’t keep a Travis, Nicholas, or a Rudy on a leash in the half court. They’re built to run, and while Nick has found a way to be a good defender with his abilities, Travis is a scorer, and defense will always be his weak point. He should be in a situation like the Knicks or the Suns, a team who will get out on the break and use his leaping abilities. Trying to shove him into a set play and take jumpshots cripples his potential.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Thank u. I have been saying this for some time, perhaps not as effectively as you.

It has seemed to me that KPs fascination with Spanish players who are bred to play a more dynamic, pass oriented (think Steve Nash) type offense is at odds with the style of the coach and the star player on the team, Brandon Roy.

It is why I don’t think Rudy really fits on this team.

It is why I think the front office has some issues to sort out that are as important as anything else for this team to get to the next level.

It is also why, I think signing Hedo is probably a good move. Because it will bring some definition to this problem.

by Blazin' on Jul 2, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

It’s ironic, because KP helped with the Spurs, who normally aren’t a running team. They have a great coach though, who makes it work.

Ginobili is funny, because he’s a tweener with styles. He can run and spot up , but he’s not really quick like more wing/SG players who play in a running style. He’s not slow, but he’s more deliberate, which is why it works.

You can always have an uptempo PG, because if he’s pass first, all it creates are matchup problems for the other team, because he can get his own shot with quickness, tire out defenders, and pull the bigger, better defenders off of the SG/SF and let them be effective.

There’s a lot more to basketball than just stats. Hedo is a great move for 2-3 years max, but don’t expect him to be a great deal at 5 yrs/50 mil when we have a huge free agency period coming in a year and you have great potential role players. I feel adding a big player at this point is too early and will lead to problems.

(See, Shaq in PHX)

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A nice argument. But I see a couple glaring holes in it.

1) Portland doesn’t have to “crush” their record from last season. In fact if they repeat the number of wins they will be going well. And considering how they played the last month of the season, particularly with regard to point differential, and there is good reason to believe they will improve on last year’s record.

2) Hedo isn’t really an A-lister, as you put it. I’m not sure he’s ever made an All-Star roster. He’s certainly in the spotlight right now, but that’s more a combination of his being one of the very few FA’s that’s deemed of interest in a poor crop of FA’s and of the recentness of his appearing in the Finals. Both of those spotlights are the sort that fade very quickly. Come December, no one is going to be tuning into the Blazers because of Hedo hype, unless he’s performing at a level that has the Blazer’s red hot.

3) Based on his record to date, I don’t see where Kevin Pritchard or Paul Allen, for that matter, value media hype and the spotlight over putting together a team with a chance at a title. In fact everything so far says that Pritchard is all about taking the patient, long term approach. Sure he is aware of PR, but I challenge anyone to show where it is appaent that PR has been the primary factor driving any of Pritchard’s personnel decisions.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those aren't hole...

1. If you don’t agree, then simply, you’re acknowledging mediocrity. You cannot simply duplicate with no progress. If they don’t post a better record, they will be slammed in the media, we all know that. Portland is attempting to rebuild not only their team, but their entire image, which plays a huge part of it.

2. Hedo is an A-lister. There are pluses and minuses, after all. How you say he’s not an A-lister is ridiculous. He was the leader in assists on the team that lost to the champions. If that doesn’t put you right at the top of the list, then I guess quit the NBA now, because nobody is Kobe, Lebron or MJ. He also was a 6th man of the year nominee, and recently won Most Improved Player. He has a career high 39 points against the Raptors too. Last season he averaged 19.5 points, 5.7 rebounds and 5 assists per game while starting all 82 regular season games.

And you say that doesn’t make him A-list? Please.

As far as performance going into hype, of course, as with everything, if there is no performance, there is no publicity. What you refuse to see is that isn’t a “hole,” it’s just reality.

If I say I’m going to get drafted, I create some sort of fantastical hype. Then if I DO get drafted, I live up to my “expectations.” If I don’t, I lose credibility and respect, and probably get laughed on on ESPN too. The point is, you can’t say that since Hedo isn’t as big as one of the top 3 players in the NBA, he’s not a media generator. The fact is that while you may think the FA pool is “weak,” it still IS, meaning that regardless of the quality, the bigger name will still generate buzz, because that’s how media and PR works. If it was a bunch of WNBA players, it would be the same thing, and same with NHL, or MLB. It’s not the quality of the players, it’s the amount of media coverage that they have that generates the buzz.

While I understand what you’re saying, that is from a perspective of a results oriented argument, which is completely against what normal PR follows.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Note

The stats from Hedo were from the 07-08 season, last year he played 77 games *

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As of now, they are beginning to be

Just because you hate them doesn’t mean they aren’t working their way up.

With the amount of publicity that carries with them, they have sure become them.

Look, there is a difference between being a quality player, and being an A-list player. Tmac is A list, but he’s injury prone so far. So are other players.

That doesn’t change the fact that right now, Hedo is the talk of the town, and everyone’s waiting to hear the news. If he returns to nothingness next year by not performing on the level that he did this year, and not getting to where he did, then he can go back to being on the C or D list-wherever you see him fit.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't care less about Tom Cruise, but I admit that he's an A-list celebrity.

On the other hand, though, Spencer & Heidi Pratt, Jon & Kate, and others of that ilk aren’t A-list celebrities, but rather a flavor of the month celebrity.

As an analogy, Tom Cruise : Kobe Bryant :: Jon & Kate : Hedo Turkoglu.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh whoa, you really just went there.

Point Ak.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lastly...

3.

Of course they value media reputation. Why else would they dismiss the prior Blazers and start fresh? Being in tune to media attention doesn’t have to equal going after only marquee players and signing them to big contracts. To think that the Blazers don’t do their best to generate buzz and media hype is crazy, haven’t you seen the big grain silo?

You can get two birds with one stone in this case, because the previous reputation was so bad that going towards a championship and getting media hype are both inter-connected! You can’t just sneak up and suddenly be a contender.

The point is, the Blazers need to somehow improve over last season, and if they don’t, they risk losing some steam that has been generated. With the drama surrounding Oden, there needs to be something to take the pressure off of him and Roy so that they can continue to develop. If you don’t get a player like Hedo, you’re shifting the focus back on the current players, which could be potentially dangerous to morale and public opinion, both of which are death sentences to coaches, GMs and team reputations. You may or may not agree that Hedo is top quality, but as far as media coverage goes, and expected potential if the Blazers do sign him, there’s no debating that, because it already has been established.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We can disagree whether or not Turkoglu is a top tier talent.

I’ve always been a fan of his and think he’s a very good player. But I’m not sure I would consider him a number 1 or number 2 option type guy. That would probably be a quick definition of what would consider “a-lister”.

I suppose we can disagree as to how important it is that Portland improve on this past season’s record. I will surely grant that there will be a portion of the fan base that will call for Nate’s head if the team doesn’t win more than 54 games. Those tend to be the sort of fans you can ignore, as you can never please them enough. But I will stand by the assertion that the Blazer’s do not have to crush last season’s win total. I’m not certain how you define crush, but that implies by a large margin. Improving by even a couple of victories will be a very successful achievement. One that most fans will be happy to accept.

As to your primary point of PR – I still think you are off the mark and have not done much to prove your case. I never said the Blazer’s do not value a good media reputation. In fact the evidence has shown that after what has occurred in the past, they once again “get” the importance of image and more importantly, a good relationship with their fans. However that is not the same thing as claiming Portland considers maintaining a PR driven sense of hype and excitement as the critical component of their strategy. Like any sports team they want to generate a buzz. But since the current management team has been in place, they have done nothing that I can recall to support the argument that maintaining a buzz is more important than assuring they have available both the best selection of personnel and the widest possible array of options, present and future.

I think I’m pretty safe in saying that for the majority of Portland basketball fans, the era of the Jailblazer days is in the past. There may still be hold outs, but for the most part, people have recognized that the team they onced loved is under new management and is again a group of young men they can give their hearts to. And as any real fan knows (and Portland has an abundance of real fans) your team can stumble from time to time and they will still have your love. And I suspect that the players are made of sterner stuff than you apparently give them credit for. I don’t see these guys suddenly folding and losing confidence, even if they get off to a rough start.

If you disagree, then please point to any evidence of Kevin Pritchard putting short term buzz ahead of a long term plan for success.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If the Hedo deal goes through, there's your proof

I never said he’s had a track record of doing so in the past.

What I am saying though-is that it makes sense from a business perspective. KP is a GM, and GMs DO have to worry about other aspects.

Never did I say that they only care about the bottom line, or under-valued winning.

What I DID say though, is that from a GM perspective, one has to weigh in all the options, and Hedo right now brings in a lot of great PR. At this point, even if the Blazers don’t go after him, they can ride the press train for a while and perhaps enjoy some increase in their stock.

As was mentioned in another post here, there are variable aspects to this deal other than salary, contract lengths and performance. People, especially die hard fans, want to think that winning is the only thing that matters, but if that was the case, teams would be high into the luxury tax and nabbing as many good players as they could.

I also didn’t say they would lose confidence. There’s something that is missing from most people’s thought process, and that’s the fact that we are talking about professional sports! It’s fine for a player or a team to break out for a season, but why are so many players moved so quickly after? Why do players opt out? Because it’s common knowledge that in a lot of cases, these players or teams can easily slide back to their previous level of play very quickly.

Maintaining excellent play is harder than developing it, because you have to constantly be learning and getting better. You cannot simply just do the “same thing” as previous, because you’re basically losing ground. If I perform the same as I did last year, I didn’t tie, I actually lost, because professional sports, as with many other performance based activities are based on a slope, not a line.

Not to mention, NBA teams have excellent scouting, and now have had time to prepare, compare notes, and watch endless hours of game film on Brandon Roy, LA, etc, and will now come at them even harder than last year. Especially after the Houston performance, teams know what it will take to win against these guys, so unless there is some change made in the Portland management office, they run a high risk of them exposing their players to a long, tough season.

In no way am I hating on the players, but that’s just the reality of the situation, if they’re not improving, they’re going backwards. Especially when other teams are always hunting for their spot in the playoffs.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its like trading something you cooked for some Taco Bell.

What you cook might just be the best meal you are ever going to eat. But with the Taco Bell, you know what your going to get. It is going to be delicious.

The problem with Taco Bell is soon after you eat it, you just might feel awful. And if things go bad enough, you might just end up throwing up.

Whoa, it is definetly time for bed. I hope someone understands the point I tried to make.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One could claim

That KP’s methods are actually very reflective of a business relationship. Outsiders didn’t take kindly to the handling of the Miles situation.

Obviously I expect people here to jump on the bandwagon and defend our GM, and I’m not going to condemn either…but I think that the thought that the Blazers are 100% concerned with only the betterment of the team and not considering financial success at all is kind of crazy.

Read here: http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-milespritchard011709&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Blazers have to know that they’re not ready to win anything yet

That may be your opinion, but I don’t think it is shared by Paul Allen and Brandon Roy

Portland is not “that” far behind L*A and Cleveland (etc) Compare the Houston series when Portland battled against Yao and the L*ker series when the Rockets “lost” Yao but still forced a 7th game. The Blazers are not a good matchup for L*A, the L*kers haven’t won a game in Portland in years. And those losses were against a young team in rebuilding mode

The “window” is wide open, whether the “do nothing and let the cake bake” crowd wants to acknowledge it, or not. The only roster adjustment that remains for KP is to identify the “keepers” and add a veteran or two to help the kids get over in the playoffs.

And hey, that’s what I see him doing right now, in his pursuit of Turk

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can respect that

I would personally say the window is still a bit out, and I’d hate to see someone like Turk added that would shorten the window in the long term.

But hey, if they’re sure that adding him is enough to go to the Finals, then go for it. I’m just very far from convinced.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you

our window is open right now.

by Falcao on Jul 2, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Houston series was in no way close.

We were manhandled in the first round with home court advantage. If the championship window is open, there is no evidence of it.

by Blazin' on Jul 3, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hollinger

jay (portland, oregon)

Do you like the blazers going after Hedo?

John Hollinger: I like it .. not sure I love it. He’s not really a $50 million player or anything close to it, but he’s probably the best fit of the players available.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Kelly Dwyer

[Comment From RB]
Can you please explain why Portland wants a 30 year old inefficent scorer? Help me with the logic.

KDonhoops: Because he was on TV a lot this spring. Sorry for being flip, but that’s what drives it. Every damn summer.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Skeets and Orlando's Ben Q Rock

[Comment From Ben Q Rock]
Love the reports that the “loser” of the Turkoglu sweepstakes probably winds up with Ariza. Because getting the younger, better player, more cheaply, is “losing.”

J.E. Skeets: Exactly. I’m going cry if my Raps sign Hedo to some crazy-ass, long-term deal. The whole thing just reeks of a Toronto Maple Leafs type move.

(That makes sense to about three of you.)

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

More Dwyer

KDonhoops: There’s no reason Batum can’t grow into a better player, and the Blazers can use that space on backcourt defenders.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

[Comment From Eric]
You think there’s anything to the “Rudy is pissed/leaving” rumors?

KDonhoops: It’s all agent talk, hoping for an earlier extension.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

[Comment From Jon L]
I thought Portland was supposed to fill out their roster with older role players now, not guys who need the ball.

KDonhoops: Why not a series of role players in their mid-20s? What’s the point of going for things now, only to regret it once Roy and Oden are in their primes?

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin Pritchard (PDX) What is the biggest downside of bringing in Hedo?

John Hollinger: The fact that he’s 30 and might stink in two years. That’s the downside potential.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anthony (New York) Why do the Blazers prefer Hedo to Ariza? It’s unclear Hedo and Roy will be a good match since they both need the ball in their hands to be at their best. Furthermore Ariza is cheaper, younger, and a better defender.

John Hollinger
Blazers desperately want another player who can create off the dribble so they’re not so ridiculously dependent on Roy, something Houston exposed in last year’s playoffs. So Hedo fits — the Blazers can even use the “no PG” lineup like Orlando did and play Rudy-Turk-Roy in the backcourt. As for Ariza, my presumption has been that LA would match any offer for Ariza, and despite the comments put out there yesterday it’s not clear to me that LA really isn’t willing to go past midlevel for him — now if they can get Artest for the dame money THEN I think Ariza is very portable and a team like Portland should pounce.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can get behind Turkoglu if...

If he’s not a 5 year, 10 million dollar contract.
If he can play at least average defense.
If he brings other things to the floor besides mediocre shooting.
If he’s okay being the third or fourth option.
If he doesn’t take minutes away from Rudy, of whom I think is a greater asset.
If he realizes that he needs to not take possessions off.
If we have someone else lined up in exchange for Outlaw.

All of these things could very well be true. But that’s a lot of ifs.

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 12:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that's a good list to start with

I think a lot of people are way overvaluing Hedo’s playmaking skills. Why do we need a PG, Roy and Hedo to make plays?

"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"

by Magnum on Jul 2, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

one thing's for sure...

we absolutely need a second playmaker. Whether it’s Hedo or a new point guard, we have to get that.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point

it would be a shame if we are getting Hedo just for that.

6 games against Houston and suddenly we need Hedo to balance our offense. The rest of the year we need more defense to balance out our top rated offense. I think it’s the “let’s get Shaq to stop a big center” theme for the Suns and Cavs. Building a team to beat one opponent is silly.

"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"

by Magnum on Jul 2, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well

I’d argue we need a second creator 82 games a year, and come playoff time we need it no matter who we are playing.

I won’t disagree with you one iota about the defensive needs though

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We would have lost to LA and Denver as well, and struggled to score.

We just didn’t have the personnel to handle playoff basketball

by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's all about the playoffs right now. After watching the postseason it became evident to

me that Houston, Denver, and LA were clearly superior teams.

Spurs have now added a key piece and if we stand pat, we’re going to be the #5 team in the West in my opinion and get bounced in the first round again.

We can either sit with our current roster and cross our fingers that Oden becomes Dwight Howard, and Batum becomes Scottie Pippen, and Rudy becomes Ginobli and wait out the Lakers to get old.. or we can add another playmaker which puts us on par with Denver, Houston, and San Antonio while also retaining our young players. And if one of them becomes a star then we’re the best team in the West

by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What then?

What happens then, after you add a player who is peaking now, and the rest of your time isn’t?

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All it takes is Oden getting his stuff together and we can win next year.

Roy, Turkoglu, LA, and a much improved Oden makes us a contender next season.

by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really all we need is development for any 2 of our young guys.

We would be much improved if any or all of these guys take a significant step in development.

Jerryd*
Martell
Rudy*
Nic*
Greg*

Not to mention 4/5 of them are going to be second year players, and trends show quite a marginal jump from year one to year two.

There is some serious room for growth here.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jul 3, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess it comes down to a "win now" versus "win when our window opens"

Of course, we wont have our cap space when our window opens. I guess that adds another if to my statement. “If he doesn’t scuttle our hopes down the road.”

μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

Which is why I think the smartest move is to wait. Hedo’s great, but it could potentially be too much too early and stall the development of the Blazers.

Sorry, I guess I’m just too much of a believer that every time the Blazers go for the “sure thing” they get let down. Sam Bowie is coming back to haunt us! :-P

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think this stunts the development of anyone other than Nic.

Rudy should get 30 minutes if Nate knows what he’s doing. Oden will surely benefit from having another playmaker/distributor out there.

I just don’t see how this move hurts our ability to win titles 3-4 years from now.

Meanwhile, it gives us a chance starting next year to possibly win a title if Oden steps up. And if not, we at least have a shot to make a run to the WCF and gain invaluable experience for our core

by Rudy4three on Jul 2, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I meant was...

Not stunting the individual growth of players, but more, Hedo is ready to contribute now, and I don’t think the Blazers as a whole are prepared to do so. I still see them as 2 years out, another one at best.

While Hedo may make up a great starting 5, the bench will ultimately need to be stronger to go deep into the playoffs.

by Aleksi on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Turk could help the kids get "there" sooner

By showing them how improve their interior passing, and increasing Greg’s confidence one dunk at a time

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Get to another team you mean.

Remember, Hedo will be taking their development minutes and smothering their potential.

There is nothing wrong with Batum’s interior passing.

by spencerbutte on Jul 2, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turk will win you over

But if you want to jump off the bandwagon and root for another team, no