Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Trevor Ariza the Consolation Prize?


As Blazer Ninja pointed out in a Fanshot, RealGM has reposted a YahooSports Twitter saying that league executives feel that either Toronto or Portland, whichever team loses out on Hedo Turkoglu, will offer a $32-$40 million contract to L*kers reserve Trevor Ariza.

Now obviously this information is now fourth-hand...from Blazer Ninja through RealGM through Twitter through unnamed executives.  Take it as such.  Although I'd stake my life on Blazer Ninja's credibility I wouldn't be surprised to see the hand of Ariza's agent in there somewhere.  But if there's a grain of truth to it...sheesh!

Look...I love Trevor Ariza.  I think he'd be the kind of player who could add to Portland's mix without disrupting much or demanding the ball.  He's young, athletic, and defensive-minded.  He'd be a really solid pick-up.  But $32-$40 million?!?  That better be a 16-year contract.

I mean, the guy made $3.1 million last year.  Even with his contributions he's probably going to end up a reserve.  For that kind of scratch you better end up with a starter, if not a productive one.  You're going to end up tacking on a luxury tax premium on that kind of deal.  I don't think you pay 2-for-1 for Trevor Ariza no matter how much you like him.  One of his main drawing cards is that he's a role player who produces more than he costs.  You love him precisely because he's a value guy.  If he's pulling down $8-10 million per year how much do you have to pay Outlaw or Webster, let alone Bayless and Rudy eventually?

And speaking of Rudy...you thought he was frustrated with the Blazers maybe picking up Turkoglu?  Wait until the bump on the back of his head starts throbbing.

I'm all for Ariza, or a guy like Ariza, but not at that price.  One thing I assume the Blazers know is that you can really get burned overpaying for players off of successful teams that those successful teams also deemed not feasible to keep.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 163 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Didn’t jiggamant post this first?

*Unless KP has a secret plan that makes this statement incorrect.

by staylost on Jul 2, 2009 12:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

(sigh)

Yes, and barely now that I see it. This is why I am always reticent to take sidebar stuff and mix it with the main page. It’s just easier to let the sidebar be the sidebar and the main page be the main page.

Thanks to Jiggamant too! Props for the Fanshot.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 2, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for making you sigh.

I’m a fanshot guy, so I like to see those props (Blazer Ninja certainly deserved the one he got too).

I don’t know how you feel exactly, but usually when something is coming up often on the sidebar it isn’t a waste to put it on the front page. We like to know what you and Ben think about this stuff too.

*Unless KP has a secret plan that makes this statement incorrect.

by staylost on Jul 2, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's all right if Dave and Ben do it.

That’s one of the reasons we come on here, to read what they have to say. To me, if something is “re-posted” on the main page or a feature article is made about something that originated in the sidebar then they are legitimized, maybe even a little more exciting to think about.

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jul 2, 2009 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm diggin' the sig

Look...I love Trevor Ariza....But $32-$40 million?!? That better be a 16-year contract. --Dave

by prezofdeath on Jul 2, 2009 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't see the sense in Ariza at that price

at least Hedo can play half his minutes at the 4 spot, and fills the much-needed role of playmaker (yes, we need more than just one of those). Ariza does neither of those things, and then leaves us with 4 small forwards, not including Rudy, no backup 4 at all, and not having addressed any of our needs really, as he’s not even a bigtime 3rd scorer.

If we add him, I would have to assume it’s part of a much broader strategy of roster consolidation through a couple of follow up trades

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 12:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If Hedo and LMA take up all of the minutes at the 4

We will have the softest “power” forward position in the game. Nothing but midrange jumpers. Yuck.

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From DraftExpress:
Pendergraph is a meat and potatoes type player, mostly living off scraps offensively. The overwhelming majority of his points come off the ball—cuts, offensive rebounds, pick and rolls, and in transition. He’s smart, has terrific hands, and finishes pretty well around the basket—which makes him a reliable target inside. He’s one of the most efficient players in college basketball, shooting 67% from the field and 79% from the free throw line, which speaks to the role he plays for ASU and the fact that he understands his limitations.
Defensively, Pendergraph is very solid, showing extremely active feet in Arizona State’s zone. He’s not particularly tall, long or bulky, but his effort level, smarts and fundamentals allow him to be effective. He has nice timing and will block the occasional shot, although this probably isn’t something that is expected to translate that effectively considering his average physical attributes. He’s a good, but not great rebounder on top of that.

You’re right, beast and bully isn’t accurate. How about wheel and deal?

by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha that's sig material right there

Look...I love Trevor Ariza....But $32-$40 million?!? That better be a 16-year contract. --Dave

by prezofdeath on Jul 2, 2009 12:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

looks good...

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks....

…this is exactly how I feel about Ariza. Plus on a fully irrational, undefensible level, I don’t want to overpay for a Laker cast off. If we ended up paying Ariza 8-10 million a year, why do I get the feeling The Lakers would take it as a victory for themselves.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 2, 2009 12:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Word is that Ariza

or his agent most likely, has told the L*kers that he wont accept the Mid-Level Exception from them, and basically they wont be getting a discount for his services….

by cLaRkY on Jul 2, 2009 1:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A four-year, $32 million contract for Trevor Ariza is fair-market value.

2009-2010: $7,250,000
2010-2011: $7,750,000
2011-2012: $8,250,000
2012-2013: $8,750,000

Without question, that’s undoubtedly more fiscally prudent — as well as apt regarding roster contruction and offensive fit — compared to offering a declining Hedo Turkoglu, 30, an absurd five-year, $50 million contract.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 1:06 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's a five year, $36 million

09/10: $6,153,846.20
10/11: $6,676,923.20
11/12: $7,200,000.20
12/13: $7,723,076.20
13/14: $8,246,153.20

by JordanLeDoux on Jul 2, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That contract includes more than an 8% annual raise from its starting salary, so it wouldn't work.

A five-year, $37.5 million contract for Trevor Ariza would theoretically look like this deal.

2009-2010: $6,500,000
2010-2011: $7,000,000
2011-2012: $7,500,000
2012-2013: $8,000,000
2013-1014: $8,500,000

Since 8% of $6,500,000 of $520,000, the annual raises of $500,000 are kosher. I’d also add a 15% trade kicker and an early termination option that can be exercised after the fourth season in the deal for Ariza’s sake, as that gives him more incentive to sign it.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ariza is terrific, absolutely terrific, but the Blazers have this guy named Nic Batum, see, and I would think it would be best developing him...

The team needs to NOT be chasing a bunch of Free Agents. It will just throw the team’s salary schedule out of wack, create discontent, lessen team unity, and won’t add all that much to the bottom line…

As for Hedo, I like his game and I think he plays a lot like Roy. I’d be CURIOUS to see it, but long-term, I want the team to develop the players it already has. Breaking the bank for Turk doesn’t make sense to me.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 2, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't have anything against Ariza.

In fact I think there is a lot to like about him. But I agree with you that he fits a need that Portland doesn’t really have.

Lets assume that Nic had stayed in France last season and the medical staff is telling KP that Martell’s foot might never heal properly. In that case I can see Ariza as a FA target. But even then I can’t see offering him a deal that averages out at more than $6 million a year. 5 years at $30 million sounds reasonable. Anything more than that is overpaying in my opinion. Give him a player option or two, but don’t overpay.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is indeed nice as he has demonstrated with big playoff plays, but hardly at that price

Nic is already the better three point shooter, free throw shooter and shot blocker as a rookie, compared to Ariza who started very young and that was his season 5. Having two Nics is good, but not a desperate need.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/tiny.cgi?id=lU2Xd

What I find interesting also about these SF rumors: The Blazers obviously don’t count on Martell to contribute much next season although KP still talks about hoping for a breakout season. Or he and Travis would be moved.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 1:13 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I don't know why anyone should...

Foot injuries reek of major setbacks, especially for guys already lacking in the “foot speed” and “lateral quickness” departments.

by TheMadKiwi on Jul 2, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please say no to play off kool-aid

free agent prices always get bumped up too much after a 20 game stretch of good to very good play. His season numbers except for the steals are not impressive nor was he impressive when ever I watched them on t.v. (not including the playoff)

by Boss_Raptor on Jul 2, 2009 1:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

why is Ariza the next option?

if Turkoglu is under serious consideration why wouldnt you just move to Lamar Odom if Hedo does not work out?

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 1:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Odom is staying.

He also says he needs to live by the beach. Portland is probably not on his list of possible destinations.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 1:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So we could bid him up or at least talk about it.

So other teams would take the bate to try and steal Odom from the Lakers who are paying double.

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jul 2, 2009 2:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Odom goes to San Antonio.. He doesnt really like Kobe very much and quite frankly they dont play him enough. They should start Pau at C and Odom at PF

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jul 2, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SA

has neither the cap space to sign him or players to trade for him

SA is what it is aside from some vet additions

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

they do

I would be suprised if they could get Odom for MLE

If he gets MLE and takes it, it would probably be for LA.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

based on what information?

Odom was drafted by the Clips, and has stated that he LOVED coming back in the Shaq trade.

Also, Odom has spent his entire career in beach cities (LA, Miami), and has stated he wants to stay near the beach.

And lastly, what fact do you have that Odom doesn’t like Kobe. Post a link and prove it.

by tandur on Jul 2, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just couldnt imagine

a FA with any cache going to LAC

strangers things have happened though

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

People tend to change their minds

when it comes to having a huge raise dumped in their lap. This maybe the case if Ariza gets what he is asking for and Buss is really serious about not paying x amount over the luxury tax.

This is not really about how I feel about Odom, but if you really want a point forward and Hedo is not available, then I would say Odom is the only player who comes close to having Hedo’s skill set.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Odom is a bum

Seldom motivated, he’s sulky, streaky and inconsistent.

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

see

he is a Hedo copy

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

me either

but it is popular sentiment around here

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 2, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm begging to lose faith in KP.

What if he’s desperate to sign someone after every other free agent signs somewhere else?

by tominhawaii on Jul 2, 2009 1:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it's a giant, brilliant scheme.
  1. Pursue Hedo like crazy and offer him BIG money.
  2. Everyone thinks, ZOMGOSH PRITCHARD NEVER FAILS AND HE WANTS HEDO
  3. Everyone realizes, “Crikey, we can’t fight Allen’s wallet!”
  4. KP calls up Rudy’s agent and says, “Start a ruckus so we have an excuse to pass on Hedo.”
  5. Everyone says, “Blazers can’t have Hedo or they’ll tick off that Rudy kid.”
  6. Everyone says, “HEDO BACK ON THE TABLE!”
  7. Everyone says, “Mmm Hedoooooo!”
  8. KP stands pat with our beautiful capspace and uses it somewhere else, meahwhile laughing as some poor, unsuspecting team gets Turkish Delight Heartburn.

Look...I love Trevor Ariza....But $32-$40 million?!? That better be a 16-year contract. --Dave

by prezofdeath on Jul 2, 2009 1:44 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It rather feels like he can’t get a lopsided deal done right now that would truly boost the team, and Hedo is the Best Consolation Prize Available. To be stored for later trading purposes when the roster might have to get revamped. Using the cap space before it goes to waste.

by Norsktroll on Jul 2, 2009 1:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I gave up trying to figure out what is going on

I really doubt Rudy said that junk since it seems like following the Blazers free agent moves is the last thing on his mind. Everything else seems like it is a shell game. KP and company have to mingle with the big name free agents to keep their name out there. I just hope they absorb salary in a trade instead of using the capspace to sign an expensive free agent.

by tominhawaii on Jul 2, 2009 2:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm starting to feel this way to

No way it was “plan A”.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

hilarious, KP the puppet master

by U-Andy-O on Jul 2, 2009 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or maybe Kirk's deal is already in KP's pocket?

So he just trying to get best SF available for all under-the-cap-money we have? I cann’t imagine he left us with Blake and get into that SF stuff over PG needs.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 5:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Won't be surprised

If something is already hammered out there and is announced July 8th.

by TheMadKiwi on Jul 2, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would

sources out of Chicago are saying that Hinrich is off the table now that Gordon is gone

I suppose they could replace Hinrich with Blake and Outlaw and bank the 7.6 mil savings next July

but my suspicion is that if Hedo signs KP/Nate will become less agressive re: upgrading the PG position, we’ll see

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's been all over the internet for a month

if BG goes, Chicago much more likely to keep Kirk to backup both guard spots.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 2, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dwyer said just today that the team might dump Hinrich for cap space in 2010.

by Cablinasian on Jul 2, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

10 millions / year in long-term for backup?

Its not smart at all. I would better save some cap space for 2010 to rebuild around Rose.

But also, they will end up with a nice group of guys for THIS season to battle for the playoffs spot:

Rose/Blake
Salmons/Rose(?)
Deng/Outlaw
TT/Outlaw
Noa/Miller

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"One thing I assume the Blazers know is that you can really get burned overpaying for players off of successful teams that those successful teams also deemed not feasible to keep."

Let’s hope so.

I think you can say that about Trevor and Hedo.

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jul 2, 2009 1:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Why is everyone so down on Ariza?

He’s way better than Turkoglu, not to mention cheaper and younger. And while Turkoglu lost the finals, Ariza actually won them. And how would he end up as a reserve? There’s no SF currently on the Blazers who’s better than him. Batum might become better than him, but that’s at least several years down the road. In my opinion, he’s definitely worth $6-8 million a year. He’s much less overpriced than Turkoglu. If we have to sign a FA small forward, he’s my pick. He brings defense, length, rebounding, athleticism, and efficiency to the team. That’s exactly what we need.

I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.—Dune

by Muad'Dib on Jul 2, 2009 1:56 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Probably true.

There’s no SF currently on the Blazers who’s better than him.

Not true.

He’s way better than Turkoglu

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 1:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is that not true?

I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.—Dune

by Muad'Dib on Jul 2, 2009 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A bunch of reasons.

Hedu is a much better 3 point shooter.

3 point %

ARIZA
2009: 32%
2008: 28%
2007: 20%
2006: 23%

Turkoglu
2009: 36%
2008: 40%
2007: 39%
2006:40%

He also has a much better offensive skill set. Better passer, better ball handler, runs the pick and role like a champ. Ariza is really pretty limited as a spot up shooter. Hedu can do anything you ask of him and he’s an underrated defender, so it’s not like he’s killing you in that regard.

Basically Hedu makes everyone better with his passing (twice the assist %), ball handling skills, and he spaces the floor as much as anyone in the league. Ariza is certainly better on defense no question, but not enough that most people would consider him the better player. Plus he duplicates Batum’s role so that’s a bummer.

Honestly I would be happy with either one.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 2:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ariza is not a bad passer

he had an assist rate last year of 16% (essentially Tayshaun Prince/Grant Hill level). His turnover rate (9.6) was also lower than Hedo’s (11.5). I’ve also got to think with all the weapons on this team eventually (New PG, Roy, LMA, Oden) it’s good that he has a lower usage rate.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said Ariza was a bad passer.

I just said Hedu was better and he is. He has more than twice the assist% and gets a solid 4.8 assists per 36 minutes compared to Ariza’s 2.6.

You can split hairs all day long, but in the end it’s pretty simple. Turk is a better playmaker, better passer, better shooter. Ariza is a better defender. Totally different types of players.

That’s all there is to it.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 3:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree on that...

though I do believe Ariza’s shoot efficiency saw enough in a bump in the playoffs that we can expect him to be at the very least at 38-40% from 3 next year, which would be key. Also, we need to factor in age here. One is 6-7 years younger than the other, would cost 15 million dollars less (25 million if you consider the luxury tax), and would still leave us with 2-3 million dollars in free agent space that we could use either to get a nice veteran piece later on or possibly use in a lopsided trade.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm skeptical about the shooting.

But yeah, age and price are certainly factors.

I have no idea what’s going to happen. The worth of the first move will be entirely shaped by the second. If we sign Turk and do nothing else I will be disappointed. Same for Ariza. I need to see the whole picture before I can make a judgment.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 3:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I'm doing is assuming we trade for Hinrich

if we don’t trade for a point guard the whole thing is shot anyway.

So with the assumption that we either trade Blake and Outlaw or Blake and Webster for Hinrich, the rest of the moves come into focus. You can throw a couple future picks on either one of those trades if you want. Of course if you just sign Ariza you’ll have an additional 3 million dollars to play with. That could help at power forward, or possibly in another lobsided trade. The one I was thinking about would be a sign and trade with Bass. Apparently they’re balking at giving him 5.5 million next year. Lets say they sign and trade him at around that price to us, and we send Outlaw/Webster their way. You’ve now acquired Ariza, Bass and Hinrich in one offseason, and have now garnered yourself an A++++ from me.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this lineup would be

Hinrich / Bayless / Veteran Minimum PG (Tyronn Lue, Brevin Knight) / Patty Mills
Roy / Rudy
Ariza / Batum / Claver (eventually)
LMA / Bass / Pendergraph / Cunningham
Oden / Przybilla / Freeland

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

didn’t you used to completely lambaste me every single time I suggested Hinrich? If you traveled forward in time from four months ago you would absolutely hate yourself for suggesting this.

Just saying…

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 3:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a couple things that happened

Steve Blake got ousted and flat destroyed versus Houston and Aaron Brooks. Hinrich played great defense shot the ball better than he ever had and returned to his previous form (I’m not THAT set in my ways). Sergio, our second best point guard was dealt.

It’s just too much of a hole not to upgrade. Blake and Bayless and nothing else next year might as well be admitting defeat and abject failure regarding this offseason.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see.

Yeah, Hinrich even surprised me with his return to form during the playoffs. He really got after it defensively, but his offense was pretty impressive as well.

I wonder if a deal with Chicago is still an option.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 4:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake Outlaw still equals Hinrich

regardless of either teams cap situations. I think they might be better off with Blake and Webster though, as Webster is much closer to the SG they actually need. Shaving Hinrich from the 2010 books makes them an actual player next summer for free agents. Either way, I think they’d be better off looking at Joe Johnson, Bosh, Amare etc. While it may not be the best move for them next year, their window isn’t next year.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 4:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

With Webster they're still commitet in contract next summer.

Why dump Kirk’s contract to get another long-term?

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 4:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's 4.5 million less in commitment next year

and it’s for a player with lots of potential, some of it realized that is still good and young.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 5:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I know. But..
it’s for a player with lots of potential, some of it realized that is still good and young

Or maybe for a player with stress reaction in his foot.
I would prefer flexibility and more money under the cap. You always could sign such a player AFTER you make a big FA move(s).

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 5:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is probably why they'd opt for Outlaw and Blake with draft pick options

I mentioned Webster because he’d be the better short and long term fit.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 5:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except...

you just lost Outlaw. Which means you have exactly one perimeter player who can create offense for himself. Hinrich can do it better than Blake, but he’s still not a good second option.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 3:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bayless say what?

It’s going to have to happen. Rudy will improve slightly in that regard and Ariza is a decent slasher and passer one on one.

It’s not Hedo for sure, but the defense would be enough improved to make that a very small glitch.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rudy is the same age as Outlaw.

He’s not going to suddenly be able to magically take his man off the dribble. Same goes for Ariza. Both those guys had the vast majority of their shots assisted by someone else. Brandon Roy can’t carry the load by himself. There needs to be another guy creating offense for others.

Still… that roster would be the best defensive team in the NBA. I could live with that.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 4:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rudy needs to add some strenght to be able to do it in the NBA

He’ve took his man off the dribble in Spain easily. What about the early comparisons to Manu?

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 4:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who was comparing him to Manu?
…the only way to stop Fernández is to make him pay for his relatively limited ball-handling skills, especially with his left, and slashing ability. Indeed, Rudy struggles in pure one-on-one situations if he’s pressured, as it was exposed particularly in the semifinal. Suffering against aggressive on-ball defenses, he struggled trying to get rid of his opponent off the dribble, and given his prominence in Joventut’s offense, it almost cost his team the game.-February 19, 2008

He’s already the same age as Outlaw and Roy, so it’s doubtful he ever really develops those skills. He doesn’t have nearly the same skill set as Ginobili.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 4:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Free agent class for overs

Thought before that this might be the free agents that get signed for overs. Detroit confirmed that by signing both Gordon and Villanueva for over market value.

Great article over at sums it up with Ben Gordon messed the game.

by Bairdy on Jul 2, 2009 2:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We really don't need help at SF

Unless there is another trade also to open up that room. I am happy with what we have and look forward to adding a veteran 3rd PG and a veteran 2nd PF,

by lee3022 on Jul 2, 2009 2:08 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Wait I thought we were getting a 6'10" PG

Whats all this talk about SF

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jul 2, 2009 2:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

So he able to guard PG's?

I’m OK with Hedo on one end. But what about other end? We need improvment on D so badly. Especially on the 1 spot. But with Hedo over Nic – on the 3 spot too.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 2:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can Bayless as much as you want.

That might help a little, although I’ll still pull my hair out if Blake is still the starting PG when the season starts.

by Nick Van Excellent on Jul 2, 2009 2:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

He isn’t starting PG in this league. Especially in team-contender.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 2:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep repeating that.

Won’t necessarily make it true, but keep repeating it.

Meanwhile I’ll continue to watch Steve Blake start.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 7:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake may still be the starting PG (40% 3pt shooting)

Like John Paxson was a starting PG

With Roy and Hedo playing the roles of Jordan and Pippen

(minus the defense, of course)

just reading the tea leaves, don’t shoot me

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't Jordan play in the triangle offense

which doesn’t really use a traditional PG? Are we using the triangle offense? (Hint: No)

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And defence is the key

if you have eyes on the prize.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the most terrifying

free agency period of my life. I never thought there’d be a day when I would be rooting for players to spurn Portland.

by neutroticblazerfan on Jul 2, 2009 2:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ariza looked great with the Lakers

But if you watched carefully, you could envision him being mediocre elsewhere.

For instance, Ariza hit a very nice percentage of his 3-pointers in the playoffs. But did you see what happened practically every single time one of those 3-pointers was less than wide-open? Ariza bricked it.

I’d love for the Blazers to pick up a guy like Ariza—a long, tough, wing who can defend multiple postions, run the floor, and hit the open three. But this is a role player we’re talking about; you can’t pay him top dollar.

Within a couple years, Nic Batum will probably be much the better player.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Jul 2, 2009 2:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't disagree more

Trevor Ariza age 23: Regular Season PER (15.5), Playoff PER (14.7)
Hedo Turkoglu age 30: Regular Season PER (14.8), Playoff PER (13.2)

What does PER not account for? Defense. Which is the better defender? Trevor Ariza by 3 bajillion percent. He’s also THE best player in the entire NBA at defending LeBron. If you’re thinking about winning a Championship the next 5 years, who are you going to have to stop to do it? LeBron.

What they’re asking for…

Hedo Turkoglo: 5 Years = 35,000,000
Age 31 = 10,000,000
Age 32 = 10,000,000
Age 33 = 10,000,000
Age 34 = 10,000,000
Age 35 = 10,000,000

Trevor Ariza: 5 years = 35,000,000
Age 24 = 7,000,000
Age 25 = 7,000,000
Age 26 = 7,000,000
Age 27 = 7,000,000
Age 28 = 7,000,000

Fit on the team: Trevor Ariza is the quintessential small forward, who specializes exactly in the things Nate McMillan asks of the position. He’s a super elite perimeter defender who can defend big and small perimeter players alike. He’s strong enough to take on the biggest guys in the league, and is still capable of defending smaller 2’s. His offensive specialty is shooting 3 point shots, and especially in clutch time minutes when he’s also locking down the opponents best perimeter player. In these playoffs he knocked down 48% of his 3’s (over 60 eFG%). He also has a lower usage rate which is perfect because he’s going to be playing with Roy, LMA and Oden. I haven’t even mentioned yet that he just turned 24 yesterday, and he fits PERFECTLY into our teams window. He wouldn’t force the issue to be this year, but he’d be a gigantic factor in doing things we weren’t able to do last year. Our defense would not only get better on the front end, by adding Ariza to the starters, but you’re now throwing Outlaw’s minutes to Batum, upgrading defense for what would amount to 35-40+ minutes at the wing positions.

Fit on the team: Hedo Turkoglu is a very good player that requires the ball in his hands, and can create for our bigs and would help ease Brandon’s workload over the course of the game. He’s a pretty inefficient player shooting the ball however, and tends to put up bad shots, even when inside the key area he only shoots 53%, which is actually pretty terrible when you consider those are the shots you’d want. Even with jump shots, Rudy’s overall offensive game is better. Hedo also is a pretty inept defender, and is required to be hidden on the defensive end (Dwight Howard did pretty nicely – Oden isn’t there yet). He’s not nearly as good on the boards as Ariza is despite being taller, His quickness is also a significant liability, meaning the Roy would still be required to take the tougher perimeter matchups (which essentially negates the benefit of not being required to carry the offense all the time).

Question for Dave… was Shane Battier worth the exact same contract back when he signed? You’re pretty much getting the best perimeter defender in the league at his age. That HAS to be worth something.

I can not believe how people don’t love the idea of Ariza coming here. Not only do we get that much better, save 15 million dollars, improve our defense immensely, but we weaken our biggest rival and lock Kobe down for entirety of games, throwing Ariza and Batum at him the way Houston was able to throw Artest an Battier at him. This is a no-brainer first day decision I would’ve gone with, and I hope Hedo doesn’t work out so we can actually upgrade our team significantly for not just this year, but for the next 5.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 2:54 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Agree

that Ariza is much better then Hedo for us in terms of contract and especially fit. But we already have the same type of player – Nic. I would prefer to develop Nic into our Ariza in one year or to.

But I’ll take Ariza 35/5 over Hedo 50/5 avery time.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 3:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a serious question for everyone...

Everyone was fine with Tayshaun Prince taking over for 3 years and then Batum easing into the role. Is that not cool if he were to do that with Ariza in front of him. The best guy will play, and with these guys it’d probably depend a lot on matchups as well. Being able to throw both these guys at the elite offensive perimeter players around the league and having all those extra fouls and all those fresh legged minutes can only be a good thing here. Batum isn’t able to defend bigger perimeter players. He’s just not that type of defender. Ariza brings that extra element that makes him a unique player in comparison to Batum. Batum IMO will eventually be better, but it’s not an either or, or at least it doesn’t have to be. If you really don’t think it works, consider the idea of a fair deal for Devin Harris involving Batum. Not that I’d prefer it, but if you throw Batum and Bayless and expirings at New Jersey they’d have an even harder time turning that down than Rudy now that they have Lee and Williams.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 3:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

My prime goal is to improve PG position and D. So all that SF stuff is secondary to me. But if you’ll bring me Kirk AND Ariza – GREAT! Having both guys (Ariza & Batum) is not so bad idea. But it worth nothing if we still having Blake as our starting point.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 3:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes! Exactly!

I’ve been talking up Ariza for a long time. His skill set is a perfect fit and he definitely adds to the teams toughness. Adding Trevor at SF and Hinrich at PG does seem to be the best option available right now.

I wish Hedo well but I pray he doesn’t end up as a Blazer!

by D22 on Jul 2, 2009 3:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Best defender in the league? Super elite? Let's not get too carried away here.

Ariza is a good defender by all accounts. That doesn’t mean he’s the second coming of Basketball Jesus (in his defensive personna).

A surface look doesn’t show me anything about Ariza that Portland can’t get out of Webster and Batum. Maybe this coming season, but over the next 4 – 5 years I don’t see it. And even if he does, it is hard to believe that it is worth 7 – 8 million a year.

But if Portland signs him, then I have to believe they see something that I don’t. And since that is something they do for a living and I just watch from the sidelines, I’m not going to criticize. I might wonder about it, but they will get the benefit of doubt.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 2, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think about when most defenders move up into the elite tier

What makes Ariza different is that he is a very good defender with excellent physical tools/effort who has a solid amount of league experience while still being young.

Guys like Bowen, Prince, and even Artest do not come into the league as stoppers – it takes a few years.

I would put Ariza as the most likely player under the age of 25 to make the jump to Elite over the course of his career.

by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's the best defender in the league versus LBJ

and he is among the 5 best perimeter defenders out there (by far the best in free agency). All that at a mere 24 years old. I’m not getting carried away at all. If you think Martell can provide you with anything even remotely resembling what Ariza provides on defense you’re going to be sorely mistaken. Batum may get there in 3-4 years, but even then he’s not very good matchup versus bigger perimeter players like LBJ, Artest and the Carmelo’s of the world. Being able to throw 2 guys out there that are very good essentially gives us the same weapon that Houston used versus us in these playoffs.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

...and took the Lakers to seven games.

Good defenders are like raisinettes: you can’t have too many of them.

by MiledAnimal on Jul 2, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so, I guess that ultra-efficient Roy-Rudy 2/3 combination would be out the window

if Ariza was signed for 5 years, 35 mil and solidified the SF position?

every man has his price

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depending on matchups of course you use that combo

So long as games against elite perimeter players you can throw Ariza and Batum against them for the entirety of games, I’m down.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Ariza for 32-35m is fair price.

It’s more than he’s worth, but that’s how FA generally works these days. Performing bigger in the playoffs than regular season is not a bad thing.

We would have to trade a couple guys same as with Hedo, but Ariza at least brings that lock down defender we want. Batum is not yet the defender Ariza is guys. He likely will be, if not better, someday. For now though having that combination would make life hell for opposing stars.

This offseason would turn around completely for me if we ended up with Ariza + Hinrich on this team. As would our defense.

by Bskey on Jul 2, 2009 3:08 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sure

Ariza + Hinrich sound darn sexy for me. Go for it, KP!

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 3:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t agree more – Ariza is nice being that productive for this amount of money, but for 10M per year we can probably sign someone better than him.

On the other hand – he’s a L*ker, and really important one for them. Making him a Blazer would really feel nice. But still, 8-10M is too much.

by starski on Jul 2, 2009 4:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i meant agree with the main post :]

by starski on Jul 2, 2009 4:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sign and trade turk to toronto? take back their point guard and maybe a malcontent Power forward?

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

"New Man Law: If you don't show up for the draft you don't get to come later if you're picked. If you believe in yourself, show up and sit there. If nobody else believes in you, take it and cry like a man...in front of the cameras."

-Dave

by faith on Jul 2, 2009 4:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that's not an option

you can’t sign another teams free agent and then trade him. Or at least you can’t until December 15th.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if they're aware of it being the deal and they sign on (turk and his agent) then it can happen on the 8th.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

"New Man Law: If you don't show up for the draft you don't get to come later if you're picked. If you believe in yourself, show up and sit there. If nobody else believes in you, take it and cry like a man...in front of the cameras."

-Dave

by faith on Jul 2, 2009 4:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to admit the idea of Portland paying 40 million for Ariza is hilarious. I got a good laugh when I read that.

A bench player demanding that kind of money. You don’t get to come to a contender and demand money like that.

by BRoyInThe4th on Jul 2, 2009 4:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He'd be a starter here

and he’s among the 5 best perimeter defenders in the league today in addition to being a very good shooter from the corner 3, especially late in games. He may not be worth 40 million, but Hedo isn’t worth 40 himself, let alone 50. 5 years at 6.5-7.0 million dollars per year is a pretty nice price to pay for him. This is free agency, everyone gets overpaid. You overpay one million or two million per year to get the best defensive player in free agency, that’d actually be a pretty brilliant move for this team. Add in the fact we’d have an extra 2-3 million dollars available to us in free agency for a final piece, and the Hedo move just doesn’t add up. It also should be noted that Ariza is 6-7 years younger than Hedo and is entering his prime, as opposed to declining as Hedo did last year.

A bench player demanding that kind of money.

Last year he started all 23 playoff games for the eventual NBA Champions.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 5:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Btw… There are not so many teams which actually could offer him more than midlevel. So its very doubtful that he’ll get more then 6-7 millions per year. Its just conditions of today’s market.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 6:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was 48% from 3 in these playoffs

shooting 4 of them per game (in other words its no accident). By all accounts his 3 point shot improved immensely over the course of the year, to the point that it reached in the playoffs.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to see how that holds up over a season.

He could very well shoot better than 32% next season. By the same token, I would not bet on his shooting anywhere close to 48% for the year.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jul 7, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calling Ariza a bench player

isn’t entirely accurate. Keep in mind that the first two options to start or bring off the bench for the Lakers were Lamar Odom and Trevor Ariza… both starters, in some form, for 90% of NBA teams.

by Arby on Jul 2, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't Batum already a poor man's Ariza?

I’m not convinced Batum is a sure-fire Hall of Famer like some of you but I certainly think he can duplicate the skills Ariza has, which are playing defense and hitting open threes. Whatever happened to that toughness we so clearly need? Hedo? Ariza? ?

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Jul 2, 2009 6:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Having both of them would be pretty sweet.

The skills they duplicate are ones that don’t require playing on the ball, unlike Hedo and Roy.

I like the idea of Ariza. SF isn’t the top of my list of needs this off season but I think if we get Ariza and swing some sort of deal for a PG who can run PnR it’s better than landing Hedo.

by Bskey on Jul 2, 2009 6:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still very high on Nic

but if we somehow will able to swap Martell and Travis for Ariza to pair Batum and Trevor on SF-position it would be nice, I think..

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Great.. No, GREAT toughness and hustle.

Rudy & Nic

by k04a on Jul 2, 2009 6:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really. I think Ariza is a poor man's Batum.

Batum’s already a better defender than Ariza will ever be. Ariza has a slightly more refined offensive skill set right now, but I don’t think he does anything that Batum won’t eventually do better. He’s only going to get better at hitting those open threes and I think you’ll see him become way more effective off the dribble.

I don’t mind Ariza coming to the Blazers at all, but an average of 7 million a year is absolutely ridiculous.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 2, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On defense, Trevor Ariza is better on stronger guys and Nicolas Batum is better on quicker guys.

All in all, 48 minutes per game of Ariza and Batum at small forward would solidify that position for the next several years. Of course, that definitely means Martell Webster — who’s vastly overrated by some folks — and Travis Outlaw will thereby have no value to the team whatsoever. Yet, since I’m extremely low on Webster and Outlaw, I’m cool with that.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forget Ariza

Sign Leon Powe! He fits our need for a tough pf. Sign Powe (even with his knees) and find a pg. We’ll be set.

The offers won’t be nearly as large for Powe (again, knees), but he’s a tough guy and will rehab well.

by Jackalope 66 on Jul 2, 2009 7:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Why are they mutually exclusive?

If KP and co are willing to give Powe a reasonable deal for 3 years (to off-set his absence until January 2010), they can get both easily, then coalesce other assets (I’d put that group as Martell, Outlaw, and Blake) into a PG.

PG: PG (Hinrich/Conley) / Bayless
SG: Roy / Rudy
SF: Ariza / Batum
PF: LMA / Powe
C: Oden / Vanilla Gorilla

Now THAT’s a team

by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Powe probably won't be able to play for most of next season, if at all

And this is his third time with a blown ACL (one in HS, once at Cal and now). If we didn’t grab Blair because of knee issues, I’m not sure that KP would go for Powe.

That said, I do like the move, at least for a low-risk, high-potential stash-a-player sort of thing.

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am pretty sure

I read that Powe ended up having Mirco fracture on that knee. So he should be out all next year, but i would still sign him to a 3 year deal for as little as possible.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 2, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

length > strength

that’s our watchword

Powe’s too stubby, long and skinny wins the race

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leon Powe should sign a one-year, minimum-level deal with the Boston Celtics and rehab within the ...

organization. Essentially, it’d be similar to what Willie Green did with the Philadelphia 76ers back in 2005.

by AK1984 on Jul 2, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ariza not our consolation prize

If you take the Blazers’ move at face value, by going after Turkoglu they have announced their number 1 priority this off-season isn’t a point guard or backup power forward, but a third reliable scorer to play along side with Roy and Aldridge. Ariza cannot fill this role at this point in his career. Ariza only makes sense on our team if he would fill some other need that is more important than point guard or backup power forward, and no one has as yet identified such a need.

by jaywalker on Jul 2, 2009 7:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

a third reliable scorer to play along side with Roy and Aldridge

I think it’s more than that, Hedo represents a second penetrator (or facilitator, if you prefer) who will help take the pressure off of Roy and get the ball into Oden when Greg is moving towards the basket

I think Nate/KP watched Turk make Howard a better inside scoring option and thought that “this is the guy we need to get Oden where we want him to be”

by two4larue on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ariza makes no sense at all with Batum.

Ariza is a long athletic defensive minded small forward. He’s not going to provide much offensively outside of an occasional 3 pointer or open dunk…he’s not a guy who is going to generate his own offense. What does Ariza provide that Batum does not? Playoff experience is about it. But so does Luke Walton. That doesn’t mean we go out and sign him. If we end up signing Ariza to a big contract, we are going to regret it, b/c we have an option that is just as good, younger and much cheaper with Batum.

by JasonT on Jul 2, 2009 7:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ariza is a better defender than Batum...

It would be nice if Batum develops into the defender that Ariza is now (and Ariza could get better), but there’s no guarantee that he will. For example, while Nic was relatively useless in guarding Artest, Ariza had little trouble.

by PoliSam on Jul 2, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Upper body strength... Pure and simple.

Trevor Ariza = Nic Batum all growed up.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 2, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why not?

Play Ariza something like 28 MPG, play Batum around 20 (more than he got this year).

Then, you have a fresh, high level defender who can handle SF’s or SG’s in for every minute of the game.

by dprodigy19 on Jul 2, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or you could play them both with Roy in the backcourt

Just like Houston did with Battier and Artest. They could straight-up shutdown any opposing wings.

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

who guards Billups in this scenario?

who guards Carmelo Anthony in this scenario? – Elgin

Without you out there, we're nowhere here

by 22baylor on Jul 2, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batum on Billups, Ariza on Carmelo

I don’t think that Billups is going to be fast enough that Batum can’t keep up with him.

by ninjasocks on Jul 2, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Consider this also: if Ariza is taken from the Lakers, they lose their best perimeter defender. And all they can do to fill the void is go to a luxury-tax doubled MLE.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jul 2, 2009 8:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't want either of these flavor of the month players

Do not bid high on role players from finals teams!

Hedo and Ariza are both role players on their teams. It’s not like we’re talking about Kobe and Dwight Howard here. Let’s be clear, they will be role players here. Now, every team needs good role players, but it’s critical not to overpay guys like that so you can afford to pay the guys who win most games for you.

T Darkstar’s suggestion of waiting with cap space in hand is looking better and better, given the weak sauce the agents are feeding the press that we’re looking to throw our money at. No Hedo, no Ariza!

by baduk on Jul 2, 2009 8:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hedo was not a role player

I agree it’s dangerous to go after flavor of the month but no way Hedo was role player for the Magic. Did you watch the playoffs? Most of the time the Magic’s offense ran through Hedo. He was the second most important player on the team after Dwight Howard. He was the engine that made Orlando’s offense go.

JRogero

by JRogero on Jul 2, 2009 9:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree that would be a little high for Ariza

but, I’d rather pay 8 mil/year for an excellent defender with an above average PER that fits our window and weakens the Lakers than pay 10 mil/year for a 30 year old mediocre defender with a below average PER and who needs the ball in his hands.

Call me crazy.

by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 9:49 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you on this one jksnake99

see my wp48 post below. Ariza is a Top 10 small forward, and so far only Batum on our roster has shown glimpses of being that good, and even Batum is still far off from getting there.

by mmm! on Jul 2, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The more closely I read Dave's post, the more wrong I think he is

Is Dave suggesting Outlaw and Webster are better than Ariza? If he is, then I could not possibly disagree any more than I do.

by jksnake99 on Jul 2, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

it angered me a little bit

especially this…

Look…I love Trevor Ariza. I think he’d be the kind of player who could add to Portland’s mix without disrupting much or demanding the ball. He’s young, athletic, and defensive-minded. He’d be a really solid pick-up. But $32-$40 million?!? That better be a 16-year contract.
Huh? Do elite perimeter defenders grow on trees these days? He’s the best perimeter defender in the NBA near his age (24). I’m sure he looks at Battier’s contract as a heck of a deal. To have Battier at what he is making now, you had to sign him when he was 24 years old too. The price is slightly above the MLE, and that’s exactly where it should be. No one flinched when Posey was given this same deal at 31 years old, and Ariza is much better than he is. Ariza is worth every bit of 7 million per year, especially when he’d fit so seamlessly on this team.

by as11osu on Jul 2, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ariza was a Top 10 small forward in the NBA in 2008-09

His WP48 was 0.192 and that is a very solid number (for comparison, Billups WP48 was also 0.192 last season), and he has been consistently an above average producer as evidenced by a WP48 of 0.245 in 2007-08 and 0.197 in 2006-07.

The common trap that people fall under when evaluating players subjectively is that perception plays a greater role than actual production, hence people might consider Turkoglu a star and not Ariza, however if you consider productivity its the other way around.

by mmm! on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Last Night

I basically exhausted myself typing Pro-Ariza posts on just about every Blazer blog out there in hopes that we could get some Ariza support going, and it looks like there are plenty of people on board.

No, Ariza is not a creator or a super-elite SF. But he is an excellent defender, a good shooter, and most importantly… younger and cheaper than Turkoglu.

Hedo would be nice, but $10 + Million a year just seems like the wrong move for a guy over 30 years old. Paying Ariza $7 Million a year is fine with me. He was one of the best players for the Lakers in the playoffs, and he knows it.

I think Dave’s post is way off. Ariza is better than every single SF we have on this team, and would start eery single game. He might have only made $3 mill last year, but he knows he is worth more than that today.

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jul 2, 2009 10:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dave, Dave, Dave....

Dave writes..

“If he’s pulling down $8-10 million per year how much do you have to pay Outlaw or Webster, let alone Bayless and Rudy eventually?”

This is where your argument is flawed. The reason we are going after SF’s is because we arent satisfyed with any on our team. Outlaw or Martell would definitely get traded if we get Ariza. Assuming its Outlaw, Martell still has a LOOOOONNNNGGG way to go to prove he is worth anything above what we are already paying him. I wish him well, but Martell hasnt done anything near what Ariza has done in terms of developing defense & playing big in big games. Bayless is another unknown too. Rudy has played well so far, but right now he is just a 3-point shooter, and not the second coming of Manu.

I love the players on our roster right now, but Ariza is better than most of them and I have no problem paying him $7 million a year. Especially at 24 years old.

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jul 2, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think he will want more than the MLE

He’s likely to sign here or Toronto. Come on Toronto….you KNOW you want Hedo.

by Bskey on Jul 2, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can have Ariza

LAL is signing Ron Artest.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Jul 2, 2009 4:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ariza would be GREAT for the team!

And here are 10 equally awesome ideas for the Blazers to do right afterwards:

1) Release Roy and sign Baron Davis.
2) Trade Batum for Bruce Bowen.
3) Hire Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds to be our strength and conditioning coaches.
4) Trade Oden and a first round pick for Durant.
5) Trade Bayless and Blake for Jarret Jack.
6) Darius Miles appreciation night.
7) Is Bonzi Wells doing anything these days?
8) Heck, is Qyntel Woods busy?
9) Release Joel Pryzbilla and get Bowie out of retirement.
10) Request that Donaghy, Javie and Bavetta travel with the team to ref all of our games.

Keep up the good work guys! Well done! The possibilities are endless!

by Go Blazers! on Jul 2, 2009 5:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Un_bohemien_small
Is Roy a Good Teammate?
Kpavatar2_small
Just Another Junk In The Wall:  11-18-09
Terryporter_small
Blazers Edge Community Podcast Episode 008
Small
Why is the Blazers’ offense bad this year? Why is the defense so good?
P1010399_small
Photos from the Hawks game, 11/16/2009

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blake: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do
Portland-trail-blazers_small
Individual Observations - Little Mac
Photo__2__small
junkdrawer in case of SO armageddon
Small
Rotation...Oden
Small
Impressive Early Season Blazers Stats
Imported_photos_00004_small
The Blazer Guards
Small
Portland and the summer of Lebron
Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
Tough act to follow junk Nov.19
Small
Nate? Avery? Adelman?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.
FREE GREG ODEN
"It's been good for us," Oden said. "We're going to stick with it. We have...

Recent FanShots

Greg Oden with a Kimbo Slice/Baron Davis beard. What do you think?
Andre Miller is tough
Michael Jordan says "don't retire my number"
Charles Oakley to the Blazers? He says there are talks
Lamarcus: The King Cobra?
Surprising Stats from Basketball-Reference
Oden #5 and Rudy #9 ranked soph espn.com
NYT: The Pick-And-Roll is the NBA's Old Reliable
At this point, what the Blazers want most is rebounding. That was an...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm