Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

One source close to the process on Friday identified two main obstacles to the aforementioned three-way deal. Concerned about the quality of its backcourt rotation if it has to surrender Hinrich with Thomas after losing Ben Gordon in free agency, Chicago would insist that the Blazers surrender young guard Jerryd Bayless, which Portland is reluctant to do. If it can't get Bayless, Chicago might still be willing to substitute Tim Thomas for Tyrus Thomas in the deal, but sources say Utah would likely balk if Tyrus Thomas is not included.

Really? Chicago wants Boozer (who will solve all the problems they've had for the past 5 years) AND Bayless? Thats getting just a little bit greedy...

4 months ago Roxie_desk_b_tiny chrischa 138 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think they should do it

Bayless hasn’t shown anything, we don’t need Bayless as a third pg who isn’t going to play

by goblazer1 on Jul 10, 2009 12:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

he has only played 1 year

and completely retooled his shot

it would be a shame to let him go after 1 season before he had a chance to shine

also, if we get Hinrich we might move Blake to a contender

Possibly Orlando as they are getting a trade exception for Turkoglu

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yay first reply was fail

Were the bulls going to give us rose instead of hin? I’d rather have bayless than Hin, based on the upside. Of course, I also put in the time to track the rookies and their off season. Trading Bayless would be pure fail. People who support giving up Bayless are bitter about Sergio.

by lurtsman on Jul 10, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hard to give up bayless for Hinrich

although we don’t know what Bayless will be yet, it is clear he has talent. And while Blake would be a great back up pg to Hinirch, they are both about the same age, which would mean they would both decline at about the same time, and no one on the roster would be there to step up to fill their shoes. For the next 3-5 years or so it won’t matter, so for me I say do it, but KP and the Blazers brass seem to love Bayless, so I don’t think it will happen.

by usmcr3049 on Jul 10, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i agree. why would blazers need to keep bayless if they are getting a starting pg.

in three-5 years if bayless actually does get that good then he will just want another contract and blazers will lose him anyways. hinrich and black is a solid rotation at the pg.

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

however if we can get away with not giving him up. Bayless or Blake would be great pieces to go along with maybe Outlaw for another trade for say a backup PF

C*mcast sucks!

by Blazermaniac77 on Jul 10, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we'll have bird rights

if bayless is good enough to demand a huge contract, playing alongside roy, and la, and an oden who has earned a huge contract, PA will pay to make it rain championships, and make no mistake, FOUR all star level players, and one MVP candidate, will be enough to make it rain.

by lurtsman on Jul 10, 2009 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I say to it

And Bring on Koponnen

by DephlatorMouse on Jul 10, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

Gotta agree. They are giving up a couple backups and getting a 20-10 guy isnt enough for them? ridiculous. chicago, YOU SUCK

by axel360 on Jul 10, 2009 12:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Backups?

Tyrus was a starter and will be for us next season if we don’t deal him for Boozer. And Hinrich is a starting quality pg. That’s why you want him…remember.

What are the Blazers giving up? Cap room and what? I think giving up a bench guy that rarely gets on the court isn’t being greedy at all. Personally I’d take Bayless or Blake. Blake would be a better backup to Rose right away but Bayless could be a nice role player for the Bulls down the road and he’s cheaper.

by ronmexibull on Jul 10, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bayless is not really "cheaper"

Sure, the difference in their contracts is 4mil vs 2.2 mil next year, but Blake is in the final year of his deal and Bayless has several years remaining on his rookie (guaranteed) contract. If the Bulls goal is to “clear space” for next summer’s FA period (Wade) then acquiring Blake is the better choice

But don’t listen to me, I like the idea of Hinrich starting and Blake backing him up in Portland next fall

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thing is, we have a bunch of expiring contracts already

And we do have to have some quality on the bench next season. A guy with potential on a rookie deal is far preferable to some declining vet imo.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

which is why Portland won’t throw away bayless on you

by lurtsman on Jul 10, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow Chicago...

Stop being so greedy…..You guys get Carlos Boozer as it is…

But from their perspective, I can kinda see why. Besides Derrick Rose, they don’t really have a lot of great talent with upside. Boozer would leave Chicago after his contract year and it’s not like Tyrus Thomas and Joakim Noah are any good.

The Kings have the best bench I’ve seen. There are easily 14 guys on this team good enough for every bench in the league. Now if we could only get some starters, I’d totally jizz in my pants.

Kings fan

by dyshooter182 on Jul 10, 2009 12:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But if Boozer leaves after a year,

it frees them up with more money to bring Wade back home again.

by pdxer in dfw on Jul 10, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no deal

hinrich and blake are too duplicative

all our space + Bayless for a slight upgrade at PG, and loss of a change of pace backup? Just say no

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 12:25 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

slight upgrade??

I would agree with this comment if Blake was being traded and not Bayless, but Hinrich is a huge upgrade over Bayless (unproven as he is).

I do agree that Blake and Hinrich have similar skills but I happen to like Blake as the backup to Hinrich during our championship runs. It’s like having the best of both players the entire 48 minutes!

I say, go ahead and offer Millsap the “toxic offer”, force Utah to overpay for Millsap — or keep him if they don’t match — if they do match then do the 3-way deal with Chicago and include Bayless.

by mlsinpdx on Jul 10, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but you aren't playing Hinrch and Blake together

essentially you are replacing the 15 mpg Bayless is going to get with Kirk. That’s a slight upgrade to me

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

I like the idea of the Hinrich-Blake combo

What have we been saying about Blake for the past year or more? “He’s not a starter but he’d make a great backup” Put Hinrich and Blake together and you’ve got 48 mpg of quality PG production. Good shooting, low turnovers. Solid execution for the regular season and the playoffs

The #2 PG needs to provide a “change of pace”? Is that what’s really necessary? I think it’s overrated. The Blazers weren’t built to be a running team anyway, and too often Bayless bas been a one man fast break. Portland has modeled their system to be similar to San Antonio, and that means “grind it out” and win with defense and rebounding. The Blazers have excelled at rebounding, Cap’n Kirk would help with the perimeter defense. This is the formula for playoff success.

I like Bayless, a lot. But he is not irreplaceable. In a couple of years when Blake slows down KP can get himself “another” Jerryd Bayless. (They could even trade Joel Przybilla to MN for the rights to Rubio, if Kahn doesn’t get a better offer) I don’t let JB’s “potential” stand in the way of getting the deal done, if that’s the Bulls “final” offer. Rex could be a similar player to Ben Gordon for Chicago, they need him more than Portland does, and the Blazers still needs to upgrade the PG position. I don’t think that Nate/KP want to part with Blake, so this proposal gives them the chance to eat their cake and have it, too

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agreee this is lame!!

chiacgo is being greddy no dice

by These Refs Suck on Jul 10, 2009 12:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't pull the trigger

I would rather keep bayless! He has so much upside and the ultimate work ethic. I realize he has yet to show much (has he had to much of a chance…. ) but with his drive i find it hard for him to not improve on some levels. I just don’t see this guy failing to at least be a “good” player. Lets not forget summer league mvp! Summer league doesn’t mean much but it does show he has some sort of skills right?!?! Don’t think I don’t like Kirk either, because I do! I just don’t think I would give up a lottery pick who ripped up summer league for him. Maybe the 06-07 kirk but not this one.

by jcoop85 on Jul 10, 2009 12:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

we r falling a bit behind other top teams so I would rather take a home run shot at Bayless reaching his ceiling as a big time player then go with the safe a reliable kirk.

by jcoop85 on Jul 10, 2009 12:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Did I read that right?

Chicago wants Bayless, Blake, Webster, AND Outlaw? Yeah right.

by tmundal on Jul 10, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no, no

those were all names discussed. the deal wouldn’t be for all of them

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You guys are ridiculous

How many untouchable players do you have? Roy, Aldridge, Oden, Pryz, Rudy, Bayless, Batum… No wonder you guys can’t get a deal done. You want a NBA starting point guard, than give up an NBA level talent in return.

by Basketball Smurf on Jul 10, 2009 12:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

wait, Chicago is offering Derrick Rose?

oh, you must mean their BACKUP PG…

The Blazers as a whole are far more like my wife than like me in the sense of their physicality on defense.
-Dave

by chrischa on Jul 10, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake is NBA level talent

he’s a very very solid NBA backup PG. Travis is no slouch either. Chicago wants to get a 20-10 guy AND add a young scoring combo guard just for Kirk Hinrich and Tim Thomas? don’t get greedy Paxson

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We have like 3 small forwards

The Bulls don’t want Outlaw. And the only people who seem to value Blake are Blazer fans. No one else, not even Portland management, seems to hold him in such esteem.

The Bulls cannot take back Outlaw or Blake with Boozer and stay under the luxury tax. We need guard depth. You won’t give up Rudy, so the team needs to give up Bayless. The guy isn’t going to get any playing time in Portland anyway.

by Basketball Smurf on Jul 10, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bayless will get 15-20 mpg this season

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not going to happen

I love the captain, but no way KP gives up the cap space and his last lottery pick for him. It’s just not happening. Rudy will not be included either.

This is unfortunate, but unless Chi-town caves, the deal is done. It would be extremely shortsighted for Chicago to hold onto Hinrich as a back up rather than inevitably cashing in with a max FA next summer.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Jul 10, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not if the cap shrinks further, though, right?

The NBA says it will.

How much does Chicago have coming off the books?

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Jul 10, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

chicago 10-11

31.379 commited for 6 players.

Variables:
Salmons does NOT opt out: Add 5.808
Ty Thomas offered the QO: Add 14.230 cap hold
Ty Thomas extended: Add new contract amount
Add roster charges – approx 500,000 each per player under 12

estimates:
if cap is 54 million, would need to be below 37.5 to offer max deal
if cap is 50 million, would need to be below 34 to offer max deal

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sounds like they need to get rid of the Captain. Would be shortsighted to keep Kirk and forfeit a chance at Wade.

draft the stache

by Cablinasian on Jul 10, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you really think...

it would be difficult for the Bulls do move Hinrich if all they wanted was cap space. I’m sure there are a few teams willing to upgrade the pg position for only expiring contracts.

It’s funny that some of you are essencially saying that you won’t give up your backup pg to get a starting pg so you can make a championship run with you current group. You’ll trade your starter for a new starter but won’t trade your backup for a new starter and move your current starter to your backup…huh?

by ronmexibull on Jul 10, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m sure there are a few teams willing to upgrade the pg position for only expiring contracts.

This could have been done with a simple Blake+Outlaw for Hinrich trade at any time this month. The combined salaries match perfectly and it would not require any of Portland’s cap-space to complete

Something tells me the Bulls are not all that impressed with Travis Outlaw, even though he dropped 33pts in Chicago, last November

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so

if the cap comes in at 54, salmons opts out, and they renounce tyrus, they can offer a max deal
if the cap comes in at 50, salmons opts out, and they renounce Tyrus, they are right on the cusp – maybe
if thomas is re-upped for an MLE type amount, even if the cap came in high and salmons opted out, they would be short money to offer a max deal.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

on Blake

George Karl loved him and just wished his 3pt shot was a bit better

Last season he said he would have signed him if he knew that he was going to be a 40% shooter

also you are missing the fact that we just dumped Bayless’ competition for backup pg minutes so he will get minutes this season.

It seems like your 1 and 2 positions are filled and you have a decent combo back up in Pargo so why not sign a vet or a d leaguer to fill the rest of those minutes.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i wouldn't be

but this price is too high to me. Hinrich is like Blake + 25%

Giving up all our capspace + Bayless is too much for that amount of upgrade.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

isn't it an upgrade of bayless over hinrich?

i dont get it. seems to me if hinirhc is starter and bayless improves as much as is thought in three to five years blazers wouldn’t be able to resign him anyways… especially if paying hinrich.

might just be a question of if they think bayless can be just a starter or an all-star.

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hinrich is not exactly a top tier PG.

Bayless’ ceiling >>>>>>>> Hinrich’s ceiling.

Hinrich’s an improvement on Blake, but the bad contract evens it out pretty well.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 10, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When Bayless leaves

in 3 years, will you still be gushing about his ceiling? I thought Portland was in win now mode. Hinrich will be better than Bayless for at least the next 2 seasons, probably 3. You get Hinrich, and you now have Blake, Hinrich and Roy who can play the 1. I don’t see how Bayless fits in.

by Basketball Smurf on Jul 10, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly.

if bayless improves as much as believed than portland wont be able to resign him when it is already paying hinrich. wah wah.

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SPAM

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

seems to me having hinrich and black as rotation is solid

if the reason is to keep bayless for another trade that i agree with that. doesn’t make sense to keep him on the rostor.

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PA isn't going to pay Bayless if he develops?

Wrong. Blazers will do what they gotta do.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Jul 10, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hope so

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jul 10, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think at one point.

Blazers were spending $10 million+ on Miles, Randolph, Stoudamire, Derek Andersen, and Theo Ratliff.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya thats true for sure.

i wonder what the deal is with the contract negotiations with the players now. brandon and LMA

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

apparently not

they are going cheap on Roy. what makes you think they’ll just do what they gotta do for Bayless?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's what I was thinking

if the Blazers “go cheap” on Brandon, what are the other players going to think?

very rough patch ahead for KP and PA. The genie is out of the bottle and there’s no way to stuff it back in

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not about paying every guy what they want

Contract negotiations have “slowed” for, what, two days?

There’s no rush. This point is a non-issue unless they’re still unsigned in a month or two.

No team (except maybe the Raps with Barghani, which was just amazing) hands over a blank check without negotiating.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Jul 10, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who said they were in win now mode?

And even if the Blazers WERE in win now mode, does Hinrich put them over the top? Not at all.

I’m one of the group that never really wanted Hinrich in Portland in the first place. There’s no offensive improvment at all, only defensive. Why overpay for a slightly better defender who’s not the real last piece of the puzzle and then compound the problem by trading away a young player who very well may end up being better than any other PG the Blazers are discussing in the first place? It just doesn’t make any sense.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 10, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really.

He’s decent from 3, I suppose. But he only shoots 43% from 2 point range. He hit some mid-range shots in the Celtics series, but when else? Their career true shooting percentages (Hinrich and Blake) are almost identical. It’s not at all a real significant improvement to the offense.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Jul 10, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Portland isn't in win now mode.

And they’re also not in win later mode. They’re trying for a hybrid, win constantly mode. It’s risky, but if it works, look out.

Keep in mind that everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazers Edge.

by pualo on Jul 10, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we get it

since Chicago wont pay luxury neither will Portland, but Portland has paid a lot more luxury for a lot less team. Until told otherwise going over the cap is not an issue for Portland

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Canzano's article, followed up by Jaynes

The Vulcan’s goal for Paul Allen is to “break even”

the days of the “Sugar Daddy” from Lake Washington could be coming to an end

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we saw all this talk a few years

ago after the bankruptcy that caused Allen to lose control of the Rose Garden

until Paul Allen declares he is done pumping money into this team I will just go with what we have observed for the last 10+ years.

Also, the Hedo signing would mean luxury tax next year anyhow so it seems like he has not become a spendthrift of late.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we are facillitating this trade with

cap space

That is an asset that cant be taken to lightly as without Chicago would not be able to even get Boozer

Not all trades are about talent

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

4-7 milllion in cap space, yo!

We’re not just giving up Blake. We’re also giving up any number of OTHER players that cap space might get us between now and the trade deadline. That IS an NBA level talent worth of assets. I wish people would quite acting like we’re not giving anything up in deal like this. Big Cap Space = Good player.

by Dunemonkey on Jul 10, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TIME: A factor present in all negotations

How might the Blazers put time pressure on Chicago? Seems to me like Chicago has the advantage, because Portland would presumably have cap space remaining after this deal to get another FA. I had hoped that free agent was Bass, but time has passed us by on that one! The quote below seems to me that Pritchard is posturing that time is on his side – but I is it???
-
“We’re looking at all our options,” Blazers general manager Kevin Pritchard said. “We’re excited about all the possibilities and maybe they happen tomorrow, maybe they happen in two months, maybe they happen at the trade deadline.”

by Mad Matt the Road Warrior on Jul 10, 2009 12:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's blazers advantage in a way...

Chicago is the most dispensible team in this scenario. If there are any other teams interested in Boozer that have a player they might be willing to offer that we’d also like, Chicago can get cut out of this deal pretty easily if they’re going to ask for the moon (outlaw + bayless+boozer?!). Portland, however, is really only replaceable by OKC and maybe Sac, and apparently, neither is all that interested.

by Dunemonkey on Jul 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It pretty much seems to me like Portland and Chicago are all even

Utah’s the team that’s desperate to get something done. Bulls have every right to say they’ll do it for Bayless but not Blake, Portland has every right to say they won’t give up Bayless. Chicago being “dispensable” doesn’t really matter if they’d rather go home than do the trade as proposed – we’re taking ourselves out of the deal in that case. Whether that’s a win or lose for you guys depends on what you end up getting other than Kirk.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we could get more if we included Bayless

Like Utah Gets Trout Chicago gets Bayless we get Thomas and Hinrich

Draft Cole Aldrich 2010

by jlarose78 on Jul 10, 2009 1:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I just dont think Tyrus

will help us win. He is getting to the point where he is what he is. A really athletic guy who is not necessarily great at basketball. A nice back up who may become a solid starter, but I would be surprised if he becomes a lot more than that.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would say

the sun is starting to set on Tyrus’ future potential

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want Thomas

The backup PF position is still unfilled and TT is no more an “answer” to that question than Outlaw

If there is a way for KP to get Millsap AND Hinrich then he may take everybody’s minds off of the Brandon Roy (lack of) negotiations

Time to get busy

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no way

im not down for helping out 2 teams just to get hinrich

by riccc_l on Jul 10, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No way

Chicago is trying to make a short term (Boozer) and long term (Bayless, as either a trade chip or Gordon like 6th man) play here, so I can’t say I balme them. However, as others have stated, Hinrich and Blake are duplicative (Hinrich being the bettwer version) while Bayless brings something the others don’t possess in terms of attacking the basket. I’d pass if this is the only way Chicago is willing to play ball.

Team Bayless - The takeover begins in 2009

by blazeraddict on Jul 10, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It can still go through

If Utah will take Tim instead of Ty.
So how badly does Utah want Milsap instead of Boozer?

by TheThinWhiteDuke on Jul 10, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol at the thought

of Tim Thomas co-existing with Jerry Sloan, it should be a reality show. I hope it happens, bioth because I like a Hinrich/Bayless PG tandem, and we could see Jerry Sloan get arrested for beating Tim Thomas with a folding chair after yet another ill advised 3

Team Bayless - The takeover begins in 2009

by blazeraddict on Jul 10, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh it's going to be fun

If Sloan had to deal with Tim OR Ty.

by TheThinWhiteDuke on Jul 10, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

or Travis

Outlaw: “but when do I get the green light to shoot like Coach Nate gave me?”

Sloan: “HOW ABOUT WHEN YOU START PLAYING SOME DEFENSE AND BOXING OUT?”

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He may be open to a buyout.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought the point of Chi moving Hinrich was to clear space for 2010

They get a Boozer, good low post scorer for one year…he leaves after one since he’s a mercenary and Chi mgmt is cheap won’t pay him anyway…they have $10-$12 mil for a replacement…they use the money to find someone better than Hinrich since he’s over paid…how is Chi gettin hosed in this deal?

by JMoon on Jul 10, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bulls fans calling Blazer fans greedy

This is the same fanbase that didn’t want to trade Tyrus freaking Thomas for Amare Stoudamire. Or Deng for Kobe.

As for Bayless? I’m not a big fan of him. I think he has good trade value around the league though.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

dont forget about

the Garnett move that never came to be

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do it just to shut everyone up about making a move.

Not the best possible trade, but it’s fair enough at this point. They’d be taking a risk getting Bayless. It’s the type of risk that might make the deal worth it to them. Otherwise, just stick with Hinrich. Booz will be good this year if he shows up, but he’ll likely leave. The gamble on Bayless might be enough.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jul 10, 2009 1:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

if KP makes a move just to shut the fanbase up

then we need a new GM

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jul 10, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

You guys sure want your cake and eat it too huh?

You want him to make a move, but don’t want him to give up your 2nd/3rd string PG in Bayless?

If this deal gets done, you’ll have Roy, Rudy, Kirk and Blake in your backcourt. Not only is that an extremely talented/crowded backcourt, but it makes your team better for the next 3-4 seasons than if you keep Bayless.

Bayless might have a higher celing than Kirk in the long run, but who is to say that will ever pan out. You can’t blame the Bulls for wanting to get something long term for giving up 2 of their top 6 players for a 1 year rental.

by KmartLUC on Jul 10, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

you will probably

see Rudy go sooner than later in that scenario

everyone loves him, but he can only really play sg and obviously there are not going to be a ton of minutes there.

I am pretty ok if we get Milsap and leave the guard/SF rotation alone

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bulls aren't getting the short end of the deal here. The Jazz are the ones being pillaged

The Bulls are giving up Hinrich, currently an overpaid backup on an average team, and Tyrus Thomas, who has gotten progressively worse since his rookie season, for Carlos Boozer who is one of the top 10 PFs in the NBA.

Bulls get 2010 cap flexibility to sign a big name free agent if they choose to go that route. In the meantime, Hinrich is finally off the books, Tyrus Thomas is making Jazz fans cuss instead, and the Bulls finally have a low post scorer since actually I don’t know.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

na. tt getten better check the stats. also hinrich is one of their few players with trade value.

and boozer prolly gonna jet and no telling if they actually sign someone. its risky for everyone i think. btw… what are the blazers giving up in this trade if they dont trade bayless? anything?

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats doesn't tell the whole story

Tyrus Thomas is actually a decent player when he doesn’t try to be something he is not. He would be a great hustle player, but he wants to shoot jumpshots all day. As a rookie, he was more productive and helpful when he played in spurt minutes coming into the game with energy.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree. but i had him fantasy and i loved his 15pts 8 rebotes and 4 blks every 3rd game.

lol. inconstancy also means flashes of potential depending on your loyalties.

by mandoman10 on Jul 10, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know what you mean

Zach Randolph is a fantasy superstar.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jul 10, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Their cap space

So this would be like us signing Kirk as an FA.

by TheThinWhiteDuke on Jul 10, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Difference being

That Bayless is upcoming… Both Blake and Hinrich have peaked.

Plus, Bayless at his best should be better than the other two.

The Blazers value Bayless as a future star who needs a little time to grow. Everyone clearly knows what you’ll get out of the Blake and Hinrich.

by pdxer in dfw on Jul 10, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake and Hinrich have peaked

They are in the prime of their careers, that’s called a plateau. 28/29 years old, if they stay healthy they should both be productive for at least 3 more years

Everyone clearly knows what you’ll get out of the Blake and Hinrich

You say that like it’s “bad” thing. Great long-range shooting. Low turnovers. Solid execution. 48+ mpg of quality PG production…what’s not to like?

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, I'll accept plateau

but seriously, the upside of Bayless and the value that the organization places on him is much higher than where Hinrich and Blake currently are.

And knowing what you’ll get out of them is meant in the best way possible. It’s simply that in a year or two or three down the road, don’t expect many improvements. Why would you want them both on the same team backing eachother up if they are so similar?

Rex adds that dynamic new dimension to the backcourt.

by pdxer in dfw on Jul 10, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would you want them both on the same team backing each other up if they are so similar?

Why do two PGs on the same team have to be so different?

Rex adds that dynamic new dimension to the backcourt

He also bring uncertain decison-making and an unreliable jump shot.

Look, I’ve been a Bayless-supporter for the past year. I lobbied for Jerryd to start when Blake hurt his shoulder, because I thought it would be a good idea for the “future Blazer PG” to get an opportunity to play alongside Roy, instead of Sergio (who I viewed as a short-timer) And I look forward to watching JB’s progress next week in Vegas, and I think he could develope into a starting combo guard who (with Brandon’s help) could become a nice complementary player.

But…if “no Bayless” means “no deal” with the Bulls and KP ends up back at square one 7 days from now because he wouldn’t put Bayless into the Hinrich trade, I have a feeling Bedgers will be singing a different tune. Especially if Rex comes out and has a less-than-impressive summer league trying to keep his supporting cast all on the same page

Steve Blake would be a terrific backup PG on a championship-caliber ballclub. Adding Kirk Hinrich to the roster would push Blake down a notch where he would be better-suited, and Cap’n Kirk would vastly improve the team’s perimeter defense. If I’m this close to making that PG combination a reality, I’m not going to let Jerryd Bayless’ potential become an impediment

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good Find!

What stood out most to me was:

“One source close to the process on Friday identified two main obstacles to the aforementioned three-way deal. Concerned about the quality of its backcourt rotation if it has to surrender Hinrich with Thomas after losing Ben Gordon in free agency, Chicago would insist that the Blazers surrender young guard Jerryd Bayless, which Portland is reluctant to do.”

So we are reluctant to give up Bayless. Is that because he is to valuable to us or because adding him to the trade is giving up to much?

“The Detroit Pistons, meanwhile, continue to be widely mentioned as a trade suitor for Boozer, but sources with knowledge of Detroit’s thinking insisted again Friday that the Pistons will not join the trade bidding for the Team USA power forward because they think Tayshaun Prince and newly signed Charlie Villanueva will complement each other better than Boozer and Villanueva would.”

So that probably means we wont get Prince anytime soon. Right?

“Even if a Boozer-to-Chicago concept goes no further, it is becoming increasingly evident that Utah is prepared to move Boozer immediately to ensure that it can re-sign Millsap.”

Atleast KP is still getting a little Pritchslapping going on by obviously forcing Utahs hand! Even though he hasnt even offered Milsap an offer yet, just the fact that we could and that we have the cap space, forces Utah to make a decision. Funny though how all the 3 way trade scenarios involve us with Utah.

I cant wait to see how all this plays out.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jul 10, 2009 1:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd do it

I just don’t get how it works for Chicago. No matter how good Bayless and Rose are, that is a really young backcourt.

J Bay Bay don't play that. J Bay Bay 2010 'Zers starting point guard over B Rex.

by tominhawaii on Jul 10, 2009 1:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

it brings into question

Chicago’s game plan. They were a seventh seed who gave a depleted Celtics team a run for their money so I suppose they could go try and add vets so they put up a respectable show against some really good teams in Orlando, Boston, and Cleveland, or go with shedding salary and trying to bring in young talent to surround a possible Wade signing.

Then again I may be giving their front office too much credit in saying they have a game plan. I hate to put it like that, but they have been shaky for a while now.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're rebuilding

Obviously when they drafted Rose they were determined to rebuild around him. With Gordon in Detroit now, and Kirk potentially on the way out, they might as well add more young talent that might yield some long term gains, rather than a Blake who really doesn’t offer much for their future.

Even with Boozer the best the Bulls can hope for is 4th/5th in the East this year. Since they are giving away lottery players in Kirk and Tyrus, they are trying to maximize their long term return.

by KmartLUC on Jul 10, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

getting rid of long term contracts

on older players is part of maximizing their return. They could get one year rentals on decent players and open up cap space while biting the bullet and becoming a lottery team next year.

To me it seems like they are trying to rebuild on the fly, but if they miss opportunities like moving Kirk they are just going to continue to be mediocre.

Also, the fact that kirk and TT were lottery talents shouldnt be a sticking point for them. They just need to pick a direction and go for it.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

but there’s no reason why they shouldn’t ask for Bayless, and quite frankly, no real reason Pritchard should keep him either. If the Blazers goal is to get better in the short run, and the Bulls goal is to get better in the future, it’s a win-win.

It seems to me that the Blazers are attempting to do the same as you suggested above. If they want Kirk, and think he is a difference maker, pull the trigger. If they don’t want Kirk then keep Bayless and ride it out.

It’s a pissing match between Paxson and Pritchard as to who can be more in love with their own lottery picks.

by KmartLUC on Jul 10, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

there really is no reason to include Bayless

If Paxson wants to sit on a large contract that is not optimizing his roster so be it. There is no reason for the Blazers to deplete their pipeline of good players especially since they have only just made the playoffs.

I guess a lot of this boils down to who else can facilitate trade to get the Bulls some cap relief?

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That assumes the Bulls are the driving force in the talks

and that cap relief now for next season and a possible one-year rental of Boozer is more valuable to the Bulls FO than Kirk playing this season and the chance at a more appealing deal down the road. It seems the Bulls aren’t full on sold on getting Boozer, which I think is understandable. Yes, if it worked out he’d be the kind of offensive player they’ve been looking for for a while – but he’s also got a history of major injury issues, and apparently wants a big extension if he is traded. So maybe it’s a risk worth taking if they can get a potential talent back in Bayless, but not if they get back Blake.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that is true

I just dont have a read on what they want to do.

that is a team that has been in a superposition of pissing and getting off the pot for a while.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's hard to tell sometimes, because

if you go by BlogaBull, they just cannot wait to dump Kirk’s contract. But management has reportedly been stressing defense for next season, and losing Kirk would really hurt on that front unless another good perimeter defender was included in the deal, and Bulls’ management has been particularly cautious (to say the least) in how they go about making moves.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe they can get Skiles

away from the Bucks

Aside from Noah and Kirk it seems like they do not really have any good defensive players.

Whatever. I am glad I am not a fan of that team.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lu's a pretty good defender

when he’s healthy. Salmons is decent. Hopefully Derrick has been working on it this offseason and has improved at least a little bit.

As big a question mark as some of the players are, I’d say Vinny is absolutely the biggest wild card. The defensive schemes were awful last season, basically just switching on everything.

And yeah, it can be frustrating to be a Bulls’ fan – but I remember not so long ago when it was frustrating to be a Blazers’ fan, too. The good times will come again.

In honor of the dearly departed, I declare July PB&J month - everyone raise a sandwich to the memory of Ben!

by wjb1492 on Jul 10, 2009 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the fact that kirk and TT were lottery talents shouldnt be a sticking point for them

Neither should Bayless being “KP’s last lottery pick” be a sticking point for Portland fans

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think Bayless status as a lottery pick is a sticking point

as much as it is giving up a player with large upside and a small contract. TT and Hinrich are both players who are pretty much at the are what they are stage of their careers while Bayless is no where near that.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

I will talk about DeJuan Blair no more forever

by jonestr on Jul 10, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So how about this...

Boozer goes to CHI
Hinrich and Tim Thomas goes to POR
Outlaw goes to UTA
and there goes POR cap space

by jenstcy on Jul 10, 2009 2:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Too much salary for us

Thomas is at $6.46 this year, Hinrich’s at $9.5, if we only give up Outlaw then we’re over the cap…

by kobisportsguy on Jul 10, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was an semi-educated guess...

How about…

Boozer goes to CHI
Hinrich and goes to POR
Tim Thomas goes to UTA
POR gives UTA future 1st round pick and a promise they won’t make an offer for Milsap
Do they give out promises in the NBA???
Maybe they could get a 4th team involved…. my head hurts….

by jenstcy on Jul 10, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do they give out promises in the NBA???

Well, if Hinrich comes to Portland there’s no salary cap left to offer for Millsap, so no “promise” would be necessary

Not to mention that if Boozer was gone to Chicago, the Jazz would match any offer for Millsap, no matter how “toxic”

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In some ways I would rather trade Bayless than Blake

Obviously Bayless has a higher ceiling, but he has not yet proved that he can be a productive player in the NBA.

If you trade Bayless for Hinrich then you end up with a Hinrich/Blake PG rotation and you know that you are going to get 48 minutes of solid play at the PG position. Even if one of them gets hurt, you would still have someone who can be a starter at PG without killing the team.

If you trade Blake for Hinrich, you will do well when Hinrich is playing but it is a big question mark whether the team will still be able to do well when Bayless is playing. Also, if Hinrich gets injured then you will be relying on Bayless as the starting PG, and Bayless has given no indication so far that he would be able to handle being a starter in the NBA.

At this point in the team’s development, it might be better to take the player that you know will be adequate over the risky player who could be very good but could also be a complete bust.

by trk on Jul 10, 2009 2:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You're post doesn't make sense.
If you trade Blake for Hinrich, you will do well when Hinrich is playing but it is a big question mark whether the team will still be able to do well when Bayless is playing.

Wouldn’t that be the same scenario with Blake?

Also, if Hinrich gets injured…

You can’t trade for someone and plan on them getting hurt. And it again becomes redundant: Wouldn’t it be the same scenario if Blake got hurt?

by pdxer in dfw on Jul 10, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if Hinrich gets injured then you will be relying on Bayless as the starting PG

I think KP needs to add a 3rd PG with NBA experience, regardless if Blake or Hinrich is the starter. There has to be a contingency plan for this scenario

and no, I don’t think Pooh Jeter is that guy

When reached 39 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jul 10, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO WAY IN HELL

Bayless will be a star in this league someday.

Hinrich does very little for us. He is a better defender than blake, but thats about it.

KP better step his game up. We have all this cap space and young talent and havent done a thing except watch all of our rivals get WAY better.

Hi fans it Brandon Roy.
And ME.....LaMarcus Aldridge

by Derftron on Jul 10, 2009 2:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A star?

As in All-Star? Portland Fans have to rank tops in the league just ahead of Bulls fans in over-valuing their young players.

by KmartLUC on Jul 10, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you see the game he had against NJ?

He carried us to that win.

Did you know he’s still only 20 and is the youngest player on our summer league team?

His weaknesses are things that get (like wine) better with age…. Awareness and Jump shot.

by kobisportsguy on Jul 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No, I didn't see the game, but I fail to see the point

Cause he’s young and had one good game, he’s going to be a Star?

Now you sound exactly like Bulls fans.

Tyrus Thomas is only 22 years old jumps out of the gym, has freakish athletic abilites, his biggest knock is help defense and basketball IQ. That doesn’t mean he’s going to be a star in the league. Some bulls fans didn’t even want them to trade him for Amare.

Plenty of guys in this league never realize their potential. After 2006 everyone thought Luol Deng was going to be the next star. He hasn’t done much since.

You can’t hold on to all your young talent and expect them all to be stars. The Bulls already made that mistake, and let Gordon walk, held onto Deng too long and signed him for too much and now appear ready to give up on Tyrus Thomas. The blueprint for failure has already been laid.

In a salary cap league you can’t hold on to everyone and you can’t sign everybody you draft (aldrige, roy, oden, rudy, bayless) …at some point you have to take your shot.

by KmartLUC on Jul 10, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well that's not entirely true

you can’t sign everybody you draft AND sign free agents from other teams. You can sign everybody you draft as long as you want, except you will ostensibly go into the luxury tax.

"B-Roy is the best shooting guard I have played against"

-Ron Artest

by premthegrem on Jul 10, 2009 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

And I want to play snugglebunnies with Megan Fox if my wife ever drops off the face of the earth but that ain’t gonna happen either.

I would trade Jerryd Bayless under the right circumstances, but those aren’t for Hinrich straight up.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 11, 2009 12:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess who has the highest PER for the Blazers? Hint, it isn't who you think.
Ep_109_starvinmarvin_small
NOV 9 JD - WHAT CAME FIRST???
Small
New B-Roy is the Old Kobe
The_dude_small
Stats 101: Whats The Deal? Let Me Explain...
Broyhope_small
First Rose Garden Game Redux...

Recent FanPosts

Imported_photos_00004_small
Blazers Vs Timberwolves 10/8/09 Review
Small
How to consolidate?
Small
The Sched Ahead -- 11/02/09 Week Three, Primoris Annus Blazerium Dominatium
Small
Is Bynum the New Oden
Small
Brandon (old or new) is NOT Kobe (old or new) w/Poll
1-5-2009_007_small
NBA League Pass Blazer feeds???
Small
Pritchard must prune this roster
Small
A Paradigm Shift? Is the new 3-guard system for the Blazers the answer?
Kpavatar2_small
Blazers/Wolves Hold The Hot dog - Post Game Observations

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

marty's buzzer beating dunk
Brandon Roy Wallpaper
Chad Ford (Insider): Travis Outlaw "Probably Won't Be Re-Signed"
Manu catches a bat during game. live coverage

ps
check out blair at the begining of video he freaks like a girl
Start Miller

Recent FanShots

Rudy openly expresses disgruntlement
Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers
McMillan said the key to having success on the road comes down to one...
NBA Top 10 From Last Night
I hope to see a LOT more of this during the season...nothing better than seeing Oden get block of the night.
Jaynes Weighs in on Blake / Miller / Roy
Viva la 3-Guard! T-Wolves Recap, at Loaded Orygun
Club Level tickets for sale tonight
Prince has a ruptured disc
Anyone converting stream?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm